DOCSLIB.ORG

<[email protected]> Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Return-Path: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:50:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alice Slater <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: Working Group Convenor for Weapons Usable Radioactive Materials To: [email protected] X-Sender: [email protected] Dear Friends, I recently posted an enrollment form for our "1000 NGOs Campaign by the PrepCom" which listed our Working Group convenors and left a blank space for the Fissile Materials Working Group. I was just reminded by Martin Kalinowski that he volunteered to be the Convenor for the Abolition 2000 Working Group on Fissile Materials which we will now call Weapons Usable Radioactive Materials in order to include tritium, which is not fissionable but IS fusionable and a weapons-usable radioactive material. If you want to participate with this group, contact Martin below: Martin Kalinowski, IANUS, c/o Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstr. 9, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany Tel.: +49-6151-163016 FAX: +49-6151-166039 Internet, private: [email protected] Internet, group: [email protected] http://www.th-darmstadt.de/ze/ianus/welcome.htm and .../inesap.htm 101.01.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Authentication-Warning: igc2.igc.apc.org: majordomo set sender to [email protected] using -f Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT) From: NGO Committee on Disarmament <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: land mine abolition To: [email protected] To abolitionists of nuclear weapons, You all would be well advised to take a look at the treaty just agreed at Oslo, boldly banning anti-personnel land mines. May we someday be able to present to the world a similar treaty banning nukes, signed by so many important countries! The text of the Oslo treaty can be viewed on the website of the NGO Committee on Disarmament, at http://www.peacenet.org/disarm/ Peacefully, Roger Smith 101.02.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 10:14:06 GMT From: [email protected] (Stewart Kemp) Sender: [email protected] Subject: UK Poll Shows Huge Support for Ab2000 aims To: [email protected] X-Sender: [email protected] (Unverified) ACTION: Please take the following to your local press, journal and media outlets ________________________ Strict Press Embargo to 00.01am (British Summer Time), Thursday, 2 October 1997 POLL SHOWS UK GOVERNMENT SAFE TO SEIZE INITIATIVE ON NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT MANCHESTER, UK: A new survey (1) released on Thursday shows an overwhelming 87% of the British public want the Government to negotiate a global treaty to prohibit and eliminate nuclear weapons. Further, a large majority (59% against 37%) now say it would be best for Britain's security if we do not have nuclear weapons. An even larger majority (63% against 36%) disagree with spending 1,500 million pounds per year of public money to maintain a nuclear deterrent. Finally, a clear majority (54% against 42%) would support immediate steps to withdraw Trident nuclear warheads from deployment at sea and place them in storage. The findings of the poll commissioned from the Gallup Organisation by the UK Nuclear Free Local Authorities (2), as part of their work with Abolition 2000-UK (3), are released ahead of Thursday's Labour Party Conference defence debate on the future of Trident. The poll results come as the Government continues to consider through its Defence Review how, in the Foreign Secretary's words (4), to "...seize the opportunity provided by the end of the Cold War to push forward the arms control agenda." Responding to the Gallup findings, Nuclear Free Local Authorities' Chair, Leeds City Councillor, Martin Hemingway said: "This research shows the Government can be confident of public support if it acts to break the log jam in international nuclear disarmament negotiations. Taking Trident off alert and placing its nuclear weapons in storage would send a clear signal to the international community that Britain is serious about achieving the abolition of nuclear weapons in the next Century." Frank Blackaby, President of Abolition 2000-UK, said: "Wherever this poll has been conducted, it shows that over 80% of the public want negotiations to start, to rid the world of these terrible weapons. There are World conventions banning chemical weapons and biological weapons: Britain has ratified them both. We now need a Nuclear Weapons Convention to be negotiated by the year 2000. The British Government should take the lead to bring this about." 101.03.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] The Gallup results reinforce findings of a similar US survey commissioned by Abolition 2000 in March 1997. This showed 87% of Americans would support their Government if it opened negotiations on a treaty to eliminate nuclear weapons (5). This latest UK survey also confirms a growing trend in public opinion here against nuclear weapons. In the last poll, also by Gallup in the Autumn of 1995, 51% did not want nuclear weapons for Britain's security while 39% did. END Further information: Stewart Kemp, NFLAs: (mobile) + 44 468 743996 Frances Connelly, Abolition 2000-UK: + 44 171 354 9911 Notes 1. The Gallup survey was conducted between 5-10 September 1997 and tested the opinion of a representative sample (by age, social class and geographic location) of 1008 people to five questions about UK nuclear weapons policy and practice. The research was commissioned by the UK Steering Committee for Nuclear Free Local Authorities to find out current attitudes of local citizens. 5 questions were asked and these are set out below together with the aggregated responses: * What do you think will be the most serious and threatening international problem, which will have consequences for your community in the future? Conflicts based on nationalism: 8% Immigration and Refugees: 7% Environmental Crises: 24% Disease (eg. AIDs): 9% Nuclear Weapons: 14% Over Population: 13% Energy Crises: 6% Terrorism: 14% None of the Above: 2% Don't Know: 2% * Do you think it will be best for the security of your community if Britain does or does not have nuclear weapons? Does have nuclear weapons: 36% Does not have nuclear weapons: 59% Don't Know: 4% Refused: 1% * To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Spending £1.5 billion pounds each year to maintain Britain's nuclear weapons is a necessary use of public resources? Strongly Agree: 12% Somewhat Agree: 24% 101.03.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] Somewhat Disagree: 22% Strongly Disagree: 41% Don't Know: 1% * You may be aware that a Royal Navy Trident submarine is currently on patrol at immediate readiness to launch nuclear tipped missiles. With the end of the Cold War, to what extent do you agree or disagree that Trident's nuclear warheads should be placed in storage? Strongly Agree: 27% Somewhat Agree: 27% Somewhat Disagree: 20% Strongly Disagree: 22% Don't Know: 3% * Britain has signed global treaties to prohibit and eliminate chemical and biological weapons. Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree that Britain should help to negotiate a global treaty to prohibit and eliminate nuclear weapons? Strongly Agree: 73% Somewhat Agree: 14% Somewhat Disagree: 5% Strongly Disagree: 6% Don't Know: 2% 2. 118 local authorities across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland exercise their powers to work together in practical ways to promote a nuclear free future. 3. Abolition 2000 UK is supported by leading UK non governmental organisations which work together to promote peace and a nuclear free future. Abolition 2000 UK is part of the international Abolition 2000 movement, supported by over 700 non governmental organisations world-wide, which aims to secure by the year 2000 an international agreement binding all the nuclear weapon states to a timetable for nuclear disarmament in the 21st Century. 4. Rt Hon Robin Cook MP, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, to a joint MoD/FCO Defence Review Seminar, 11 July 1997 5. In a nation-wide poll of 1006 Americans, conducted by Lake Sosin Snell & Associates in March 1997, 84% said they would feel safer in a world without nuclear weapons; 87% wanted their Government to negotiate an agreement to eliminate nuclear weapons; and 77% thought too many tax dollars were spent on nuclear weapons. **************************************************************** Nuclear Free Local Authorities Tel: + 44 (0) 161 831 9108 Town Hall Fax: + 44 (0) 161 835 3645 Manchester M60 2LA UK Email: [email protected] Web Site: http://www.gn.apc.org/nfznsc/ **************************************************************** 101.03.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] 101.03.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 16:54:23 -0400 From: Bob Tiller <[email protected]> Organization: Physicians for Social Responsibility To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Draft sign-on letter on SSM First Draft ------ sign-on letter on SSM COMMENTS ON THE TEXT DUE TO BOB TILLER BY 12:00 NOON ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7TH ------- 202-898-0150 ext 220, <[email protected]> Dear Senator/Representative: We are writing to express our deep concern about the Department of Energy's Stockpile Stewardship and Management program for our nation's nuclear weapons complex.
Recommended publications
  • First Underground Nuclear Weapons Test In

    First Underground Nuclear Weapons Test In

    AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE: First Underground Nuclear Weapons Test in Four Years this June 18 Note: There will be vigils on June 17 in Las weapons design laboratories, Lawrence Livermore It is a sign of moral numbness that serious bud- Vegas and Livennore, please see the Calen- and Los Alamos, plan to begin conducting under- getary discussions continue among elected federal dar Section, page 3. Please call or write Presi- ground weapons-related subcritical nuclear tests at officials in Washington, DC that blame the poor, dent Clinton to stop rhe scheduled under- the Nevada Test Site this June. The DOE says the the imprisoned, and the sick in our society for un- experiments will not produce a self-sustaining balanced budgets. It is a crime against humanity ground nuclear test June 18. (202) 456-1111, nuclear chain reaction, hence the term "subcrltical". that our nation's human, scientific and material re- 1600 Pennsylvania, Washington D.C. 20500 Various reports indicate each of these planned sources continue to be squandered by such forces. Since 1945, the world has lived under the cloud tests will detonate between 50 and 500 pounds of The SS&M should not be used to upgrade nuclear of over 2,000 nuclear tests. These tests have harmed high explosive charge and involve undisclosed weapons, but rather, should be used to eliminate, human health and the environment, squandered eco- amounts of special nuclear material, including bomb- safely, the nuclear stockpiles and nuclear waste. nomic resources and driven a dangerous arms race. grade plutonium. The DOE says the first two un- The NIF should not be constructed! The subcritical The nations of the world can and must reach agree- derground blasts, scheduled for this year, will not tests should be stopped! ment this year on a Comprehensive Test Ban (CTB) utilize actual nuclear warheads, warhead prototypes Treaty that will ban all nuclear tests worldwide.
  • 80223-06 to 80404-06

    80223-06 to 80404-06

    Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1]) by igcb.igc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA02011 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from 218lan85.iprolink.ch (218lan85.iprolink.ch [193.189.218.85]) by mail.iprolink.ch (ipl/ipl) with SMTP id SAA148594 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:31:07 +0200 Received: by 218lan85.iprolink.ch with Microsoft Mail id <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:36:47 +-200 Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: International Peace Bureau <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: NPT reception Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 17:19:03 +-200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 Dear Howard, You will be pleased to know that Michel Monod was at the Swiss mission = on Friday, and one of the issues he discussed was the reception in the = UN. The Swiss agreed to sponsor the event if it involves no financial = cost, which it doesn't. This will save only about 3 per cent of the = cost, however. We understand you have been in touch with David Atwood = about the funding; in case you are having difficulties in raising enough = 30330.03.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] money, we just wanted to let you know that there are cheaper menu = options available.
  • Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex

    Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex

    DOE/EIS-0387 Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex February 2011 U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Y-12 Site Office Volume II: Comment Response Document COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) TITLE: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex (DOE/EIS-0387) (Final Y-12 SWEIS) CONTACT: For further information on this SWEIS, For general information on the DOE contact: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Pam Gorman Carol Borgstrom, Director Y-12 SWEIS Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC-54 Y-12 Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 800 Oak Ridge Turnpike 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Suite A-500 Washington, DC 20585 Oak Ridge, TN 37830 (202) 586-4600 (865) 576-9903 or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756 (865) 483-2014 fax Abstract: NNSA, a separately organized agency within DOE, is responsible for maintaining the safety, reliability, and security of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile to meet national security requirements. NNSA manages nuclear weapons programs and facilities, including those at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This Final Y-12 SWEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the reasonable alternatives for ongoing and foreseeable future operations and activities at Y-12, including alternatives for changes to site infrastructure and levels of operation (using production capacity as the key metric for comparison). Five alternatives are analyzed in this Y-12 SWEIS: (1) No Action Alternative (maintain the status quo); (2) Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Alternative; (3) Upgrade-in-Place Alternative; (4) Capability-sized UPF Alternative; and (5) No Net Production/Capability-sized UPF Alternative.
  • Nevada Desert Experience Uranium Waste for NNSS Making History

    Nevada Desert Experience Uranium Waste for NNSS Making History

    PAGE 1 PAGE 6 Desert Voices Newsletter Nevada Desert Experience 1420 West Bartlett Avenue Summer 2015 Las Vegas, NV 89106 Volume 28 Issue No. 1 Making History and Uranium Waste for NNSS NDE is very happy to by Judy Treichel announce the arrival of our Building a Future PLEASE SEE OUR WEBSITE FOR FULL ARTICLE: two new office managers by Brian Terrell Ming and Laura-Marie. They www.NevadaDesertExperience.org/waste.htm are both current NDE council On March 26, I was in Nevada in my role members and have graciously as event coordinator for Nevada Desert There are significant and bad differences offered to live at NDE©s Experience, preparing for the annual Sacred between this program and the Yucca headquarters and take care of Peace Walk, a 65-mile trek through the Mountain repository project. There is no the day-to-day work of NDE. desert from Las Vegas to the nuclear Test Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) They will be doing this as full Site at Mercury, NV, an event that NDE has licensing required at [NNSS] or any of the time volunteers. We are all truly sponsored each spring for about 20 years. weapons production facilities. There is not blessed and grateful to them. Two days before the walk was to begin, a even certification by the Environmental car load of us organizers traced the route. Protection Agency (EPA) as there is at the Welcome Laura-Marie and Ming. The last stop on the traditional itinerary Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico or is the ªPeace Camp,º a place in the desert EPA standards that apply to repositories.
  • Nuclear Weapons Are Indiscriminate

    Nuclear Weapons Are Indiscriminate

    Copyright 2019 by Champion Briefs, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by an information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the publisher. The Evidence Standard Jan/Feb 2020 The Evidence Standard Speech and Debate provides a meaningful and educational experience to all who are involved. We, as educators in the community, believe that it is our responsibility to provide resources that uphold the foundation of the Speech and Debate activity. Champion Briefs, its employees, managers, and associates take an oath to uphold the following Evidence Standard: 1. We will never falsify facts, opinions, dissents, or any other information. 2. We will never knowingly distribute information that has been proven to be inaccurate, even if the source of the information is legitimate. 3. We will actively fight the dissemination of false information and will provide the community with clarity if we learn that a third-party has attempted to commit deception. 4. We will never knowingly support or distribute studies, news articles, or other materials that use inaccurate methodologies to reach a conclusion or prove a point. 5. We will provide meaningful clarification to any who question the legitimacy of information that we distribute. 6. We will actively contribute to students’ understanding of the world by using evidence from a multitude of perspectives and schools of thought. 7. We will, within our power, assist the community as a whole in its mission to achieve the goals and vision of this activity.
  • Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph

    Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph

    "If We ~aveEnouah weaDons to destrov the earth manv times over: Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph. D. unleashed power of the atom: "This ba- Science, which ought always to be Former Employee of both Los Alamos sic force of the universe cannot be fitted aiming at the good of humanity, is assist- National Laboratory and Lawrence into the outmoded concept of narrow ing in the work of destruction, and is con- Livermore National Laboratory nationalisms." The Lawrence Livermore stantly inventing new means for killing the This is an appeal to every secretary, National Laboratory's logo is: Science greatest number of people in the short- technician, custodian, scientist, engineer, in the National Interest. I believe that if est amount of time. This twentieth cen- and any other person whose participa- Albert Einstein were alive today, not only tury proved to be a century of inhuman tion supports the world war machine to would he not be working at LLNL, but slaughter. In the 1914 war, 15% of ca- withhold their skills fiom weapons work he would also be strongly condemning sualties were civilian; in 1939: 50%; in and from activities that support or en- its mission. And what is the logo of Los the wars fought in the 1950s: 75%; in able weapons work. Alamos National Laboratory? Science the 1990s: 90% of war casualties were "The unleashed power of the atom has Serving Society. Do the national labs civilian. Science that is used to terrorize changed evewngexcept our thinking. believe that they are serving society by people, kill them, or make them invalids Thus, we are drifting toward catastro- endangering its very existence through the is immoral science.
  • Nevada Test Site: Desert Annex of TESTS SINCE the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories 1945 Q Denotes “Subcritical” Introduction Test

    Nevada Test Site: Desert Annex of TESTS SINCE the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories 1945 Q Denotes “Subcritical” Introduction Test

    Western States Legal Foundation Nevada Desert Experience Information Bulletin Summer 2005 update 1,000+ U.S. NUCLEAR The Nevada Test Site: Desert Annex of TESTS SINCE the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories 1945 q denotes “subcritical” Introduction test Aardvark 1962 Abeytas 1970 The Nevada Test Site (NTS), an immense tract of desert and mountains northwest of Las Abilene 1988 Able 1946 Able 1951 Vegas, is the test range where the United States government set off over 900 nuclear Able 1951 Able 1952 explosions during the Cold War phase of the arms race. For most Americans, the Test Site is Abo 1985 Absinthe 1967 only a symbol of a closed chapter of history, a time of great danger that now is over. Even Ace 1964 Acushi 1963 those who know that the Nevada Test Site still is used for “subcritical” testing of nuclear Adobe 1962 Adze 1968 weapons materials and components underground may think operations largely have been Agile 1967 Agouti 1962 Agrini 1984 suspended, with unused facilities retained only against the eventuality of a return to full scale Ahtanum 1963 Ajax 1966 underground nuclear testing. But the Test Site remains an important part of the nuclear Ajo 1970 Akavi 1981 weapons complex, both a remote site where dangerous activities can be conducted with little Akbar 1972 Alamo 1988 public knowledge and a weapons laboratory unto itself. High risk programs involving nuclear Aleman 1986 Algodones 1971 material, such as nuclear criticality experiments, are slated for transfer to the Test Site, and it Aligote 1981 Aliment 1969 Allegheny 1962 also is being considered as a location for a proposed factory to mass produce plutonium pits, Alma 1962 Almendro 1973 the atomic explosive “triggers”at the core of most nuclear weapons.
  • NDE's Sacred Peace Walk 2007 Packet

    NDE's Sacred Peace Walk 2007 Packet

    ***Sacred Peace Walk 2007 Welcome Packet*** Hello, Thanks so much for your interest in the 2007 Sacred Peace Walk! We are really excited that you are coming. In this packet you will find materials to help you prepare for the walk. Some items are logistical, others spiritual, others informational on the nuclear issue. We have also included more logistical information down at the bottom. We will be walking through a highly militarized zone: Nellis Airforce Base hosts 902 nuclear weapons; the Nellis Bombing Range and the Nevada Test Site have been site of Depleted Uranium testing and disposal; unmanned Predator planes which drop bombs in Iraq are controlled from Indian Springs; and the Test Site itself has seen 1,044 nuclear bombings. This summer will be the 10 th anniversary of the resumption of underground nuclear testing via subcritical tests under the Stockpile Stewardship program. Since the subcritical Unicorn test last August, the US has conducted four subcritical “thermos” tests involving small amounts of plutonium this year. Yet we will also be walking through the desert, a place of great holiness in many religious traditions. Thank you for bringing your healing power and your longing for healing to the Nevada desert, a place truly located between heaven and hell. We have enclosed: -Article “Walk in Peace for Peace” by Brian Kimmel (p. 3-4) -Overview of NDE and Desert Spirituality from Ken Butigan’s book Pilgrimage Through a Burning World (p. 5-7) -Article on Desert Spirituality: “Desert Attentiveness, Desert Indifference: Countercultural Spirituality in the Desert Fathers and Mothers” by Belden Lane (p.
  • 2019 World Conference Against a and H Bombs

    2019 World Conference Against a and H Bombs

    Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs 原水爆禁止2019年世界大会 2-4-4 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8464 Japan Tel: 03-5842-6034 Fax: 03-5842-6033 E-mail: [email protected] November 2019 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 3-9, 2019 2019 World Conference against A & H Bombs H & A against Conference World 2019 Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs DIC-2063 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 3-9, 2019 Main Theme: For a Nuclear Weapon-Free, Peaceful and Just World Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs Table of Contents Declaration of the International Meeting………………………………………………….. 1 Letter from Nagasaki to All National Governments………………….………………….…4 International Meeting, 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs…………………5 Opening Session (August 3) ………………………………………………………………..…… 5 Address of the Organizer: Noguchi Kunikazu, Organizing Committee of the World Conference Greetings on behalf of the Hibakusha: Hamasumi Jiro, Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations (Nihon Hidankyo) Special Report by the Government Representative: George-Wilhelm Gallhofer, Minister, Head of Unit for Nuclear Weapons, IAEA, CTBTO and NPT, Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs, Austria Messages from Heads/Leaders of National Governments and International Organizations …... 12 Plenary Session I: “Damage and Suffering from A-Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; Inhumanity of Nuclear Weapons; Struggle of the
  • A Voice in the Wilderness

    A Voice in the Wilderness

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2006 A Voice in the Wilderness Michael Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Creative Writing Commons Recommended Citation Williams, T. T., & Austin, M. (2006). A voice in the wilderness: Conversations with Terry Tempest Williams. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Voice in the Wilderness Edited by Michael Austin Conversations with Terry Tempest Williams A Voice in the Wilderness Photo by Cheryl Himmelstein Terry Tempest Williams A Voice in the Wilderness Conversations with Terry Tempest Williams Edited by Michael Austin Willet Drawing by Lee Carlman Riddell Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright © 2006 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ISBN-13: 978-0-87421-634-9 ISBN-10: 0-87421-634-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Austin, Michael, 1966- A voice in the wilderness : conversations with Terry Tempest Williams / edited by Michael Austin ; Willet drawing by Lee Carlman Riddell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-87421-634-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-87421-634-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Williams, Terry Tempest--Interviews.
  • Last Ned Hele Bladet I PDF-Format

    Last Ned Hele Bladet I PDF-Format

    Medlemsblad for IPPNW Norge Nr. 1 - 2008 - Årgang 26 Norske leger mot atomvåpen ICAN-underskrifter levert til UD Er thoriumkraftverk svaret for fremtiden? Lite nytt fra FNs førstekomité en tryggere verden uten atomvåpen Norsk avdeling av International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War IPPNW Leder Oppgaver for NLA i 2008 Tordis Sørensen Høifødt den politiske og militære konsekvens gjør noen av dette landets store ut- Leder NLA økt spenning og opprustning. Vi støt- fordringer. [email protected] ter Norge sin kritiske røst og håper den kan opprettholdes i et ellers Kampanjen for en konvensjon som ganske ukritisk NATO. NLA vil i sa- forbyr atomvåpen, ICAN, var et Siden siste nummer av medlemsb- marbeid med NGOer forsøke å sette viktig tema på konferansen og står ladet har NLA hatt årsmøte og det spesielt fokus på rakettskjoldsaken i sentralt i arbeidet framover. Arbei- har vært verdenskongress for IPPNW den nærmeste tida. Vi har allerede gitt det for å få tilslutning til en konven- (International Physicians for the Pre- innspill til Stortingsmeldingen om sjon fra alle verdens land, ikke minst vention of Nuclear War) i New Del- sikkerhet og nedrusting og vil følge de ledende atomvåpenstatene, vil hi. opp dette når meldingen kommer opp kreve innsats både gjennom politiske i Stortinget rett før sommeren eller til kanaler og folkeopinionen. Like fullt ”Leger advarer mot rakettskjold. høsten. har kampanjen allerede gitt inspiras- Forholdene mellom atommaktene er jon til ny innsats i mange land, også mer spent enn på lenge. Verdens mil- Under kongressen i Delhi fikk vi hos oss. itærutgifter har økt med 40 % over vite at India bruker stadig mer av Arbeidet med å forebygge de mange skader av håndvåpen på verdensbasis “Norge har ved flere anledninger ytret seg kritisk står fortsatt sentralt i det internas- om rakettskjoldet.
  • Endorsers of the Open Letter to Presidents Biden and Putin

    Endorsers of the Open Letter to Presidents Biden and Putin

    Endorsers of the Open Letter to Presidents Biden and Putin Political, military and religious leaders, legislators, academics/scientists and other representatives of civil society* POLITICAL LEADERS & INFLUENCERS: Nobuyasu Abe, Japan Dr Irina Ghaplanyan, Armenia. Senior Adviser, Council on Strategic Risks. Former United Senior Advisor on Climate Change to the World Bank Group. Nations Under-Secretary-General for Disarmament Affairs; Former Deputy Minister of Environment; Ambassador Edy Korthals Altes, The Netherlands. Dame Jane Goodall, PhD, DBE, United Kingdom Former Ambassador of The Netherlands to Spain and Primatologist, Founder of the Jane Goodall Institute. President of the World Conference of Religions for Peace; UN Messenger for Peace. Honorary Member of the World Future Council; Lord (Des) Browne of Ladyton, United Kingdom. Member of UK House of Lords. Former Defence Secretary. Ambassador (ret) Thomas Graham Jr. USA Chair, European Leadership Network; Former Special Representative of the President for Arms Control, Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Ambassador Libran Nuevas Cabactulan, Philippines Former Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the Dr Anatoliy Grytsenko, Ukraine. United Nations in New York. President of the 2010 NPT Former Defense Minister (2005-2007); Head, National Review Conference. Security & Defense Committee of Parliament; Vincenzo Camporini, Italy. Lord David Hannay of Chiswick, United Kingdom. Scientific Advisor at Istituto Affari Internazionali. Crossbench Peer, UK House of Lords. Co-Chair of the UK All Former Minister of Defence. Party Parliamentary Group on Global Security and Non- proliferation. Senior Member, European Leadership Network. Ingvar Carlsson, Sweden. Former Prime Minister of Sweden. Silvia Hernández, México Senior Member, European Leadership Network; Founding Partner of Estrategia Pública Consultores.