DOCSLIB.ORG

Nevada Desert Experience Uranium Waste for NNSS Making History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PAGE 1 PAGE 6 Desert Voices Newsletter Nevada Desert Experience 1420 West Bartlett Avenue Summer 2015 Las Vegas, NV 89106 Volume 28 Issue No. 1 Making History and Uranium Waste for NNSS NDE is very happy to by Judy Treichel announce the arrival of our Building a Future PLEASE SEE OUR WEBSITE FOR FULL ARTICLE: two new office managers by Brian Terrell Ming and Laura-Marie. They www.NevadaDesertExperience.org/waste.htm are both current NDE council On March 26, I was in Nevada in my role members and have graciously as event coordinator for Nevada Desert There are significant and bad differences offered to live at NDE©s Experience, preparing for the annual Sacred between this program and the Yucca headquarters and take care of Peace Walk, a 65-mile trek through the Mountain repository project. There is no the day-to-day work of NDE. desert from Las Vegas to the nuclear Test Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) They will be doing this as full Site at Mercury, NV, an event that NDE has licensing required at [NNSS] or any of the time volunteers. We are all truly sponsored each spring for about 20 years. weapons production facilities. There is not blessed and grateful to them. Two days before the walk was to begin, a even certification by the Environmental car load of us organizers traced the route. Protection Agency (EPA) as there is at the Welcome Laura-Marie and Ming. The last stop on the traditional itinerary Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico or is the ªPeace Camp,º a place in the desert EPA standards that apply to repositories. where we usually stay the last night before Ironically, the EPA is about to move their crossing Highway 95 into what is now mobile radiation detection lab from Las known as the Nevada National Security Site Vegas to Mobile, AL. The casks that would Save These Dates For Desert Justice Events: 2015 & 2016 (NNSS). When we got there we were be used for transport and the containers to surprised to find the entire camp and the be put in the landfill are not licensed by the N September 19 th to 21 st Justice For Our Desert (Vegas, NNSS, YM, & Creech way leading from it to the Test Site NRC either. All facets of this program are surrounded by bright orange plastic snow developed and overseen by the [Department Ce!ebrate "ustice#ma$i%g a%& get %o%'io!e%ce trai%i%g( More i%)o o% page * fencing. Of Energy (DOE)] exclusively. N Ja% uar+ 1 , th 2-1. M/0 Da+ 1ara&e i% /as Vegas There was no apparent reason for the A high-level waste repository would th th fence and no apparent access into the camp, accept only specific and known waste forms. N March 19 # 2 2 Sacre& 1eace 3a!$ ()rom Vegas to NNSS which had been a staging area for During the time that DOE was deciding to N March 2. th #4pri! 1 st Shut Do5% Creech 62 anti-nuclear testing protests since 1986. Not ship the U233 and U235 wastes to NNSS, only were we blocked from our traditional they revised the waste acceptance criteria so camp site, there was no safe, legal or that this highly radioactive material, some of Ca!! ND7 or emai! ND7 )or more i%)o8 9-2(.*.(*,1* or i%)o:Ne'a&aDesert7;perie%ce(org convenient place to park vehicles for about a it weapons grade, could be considered mile around, nowhere that we could even low-level waste. So in this case, the drop off equipment or allow for dropping off classification fits the waste, not the other those participants in our protest who could way around as Nevadans have assumed... not make the long walk over rough terrain. Any future repository is planned to be a We were only beginning to assess the deep geologic disposal facility. The low-level logistic difficulties this new situation waste disposal at Area 5 at NNSS is shallow presented when a Nye County Sheriff's land burial in trenches. The [uranium] deputy drove by. wastes remain radioactively dangerous for After warning us that it was illegal to be hundreds of thousands of years, far longer stopped on the road as we were, the deputy than any metal container or trench liner allowed us to tarry while he explained the would last... situation as he saw it. Some big shots at the While Nevadans continue to accept and college, he said, had convinced the Nevada dispose of less dangerous, actual low-level Department of Transportation that the weapons waste at NNSS, we will not accept Peace Camp is a site of historical opening the door for far more radioactive significance and so could not be messed materials to be thrown into our ground.We with. The fences went up just a week or so need to tell DOE that changing the rules to CONTINUED on PAGE 2 fit the waste is not a workable solution. PAGE 2 Desert Voices Newsletter PAGE 5 Desert Voices Newsletter Living History CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 Living History CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 earlier, he said, in anticipation of the Sacred Peace Walk. The artifacts of past protests The chief archeologist for the Department of Transportation was particularly effusive in would not be allowed to be disturbed by the presence of contemporary protestors. No one his high estimation of the significance of Peace Camp. Peace Camp is the only designated but archeologists, the deputy told us, would ever be allowed in the camp again. The irony historic site in Nevada, he boasted, that is less than 50 years old. My own experience with of this picture was not lost on us. Peace Camp and the Test Site, is perhaps less than historic. I was there once at the height Returning to Las Vegas, I immediately started calling various offices of the Department of protests there in 1987, again sometime in the 1990s, and then with increasing of Transportation, especially the numbers I found (to some surprise) for the DOT's office frequency after the protests against drones operated out of nearby Creech Air Force Base of archeology. I also did a web search of issues around Peace Camp and its history and began in 2009. found that in 2007, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (the BLM claims ownership of Until this encounter, I confess that I thought of Peace Camp as little more than a the site) and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Office had determined that Peace convenient place from which to stage protests against nuclear bomb tests conducted on Camp is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. the other side of Highway 95. I read in Archeology, a publication of the Archaeological Institute of America, and The mushroom clouds of the first tests conducted at the Nevada Test Site could be seen other publications how some anthropologists from the Desert Research Institute had from far off Las Vegas. The Limited Test Ban Treaty in 1963 moved the tests researched the site and successfully made the case that Peace Camp is eligible for listing underground. Although the United States did not ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban on the National Register of Historic Places. I read that to be eligible, a site must meet Treaty, it stopped full scale testing in 1992, though ªsubcriticalº testing of weapons, tests these qualifications: ªa) association with events that have made a significant contribution that stop short of self-sustained chain reactions, are still conducted at the site. to the broad patterns of our history, and b) embodiment of distinctive characteristics... From 1986 through 1994, 536 demonstrations were held at the Nevada Test Site that possess high artistic values...º involving 37,488 participants, with some 15,740 arrests. Many of the demonstrations in While the implications of this designation for us were still unclear, it was gratifying to those years attracted thousands at a time. This year's Sacred Peace Walk and our April 3 know that at least a couple of agencies in the federal and state bureaucracies recognize, Good Friday protest at the NNSS was modest in comparison, with about 50 participants, along with some of the academic anthropological community, the fact that a couple of and we were happy that 22 of these were arrested after crossing into the site. generations of antinuclear activists had ªmade a significant contribution to the broad The numbers coming to protest testing in Nevada decreased sharply with the end of patterns of our history.º Designs, symbols and messages affected by arrangements of rock full scale testing there, and it is not surprising that nuclear testing is not the burning of different colors and sizes (ªgeoglyphs,º in archeology talk), alabaster statues called the cause of the times. Protests at sites more directly involved with nuclear weapons Shadow Children, and the development still gather larger numbers. Just three weeks before our most recent protest, graffiti scrawled on tunnels about 200 protestors camped outside the gates of Creech Air Force Base, the hub of drone under the highway have official murders just down the highway from the NNSS. recognition that they ªpossess It is crucial, though, that some of us keep showing up at the test site and using our high artistic valuesº deserving to bodies to add to the slowly growing tally of those who risk arrest there to say no to the be protected by law! unspeakable horror of nuclear war. We had already left Las Vegas Thousands of workers still drive each morning from Las Vegas to report for work at the on our five day trek to the Test NNSS.
Recommended publications
  • First Underground Nuclear Weapons Test In

    First Underground Nuclear Weapons Test In

    AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE: First Underground Nuclear Weapons Test in Four Years this June 18 Note: There will be vigils on June 17 in Las weapons design laboratories, Lawrence Livermore It is a sign of moral numbness that serious bud- Vegas and Livennore, please see the Calen- and Los Alamos, plan to begin conducting under- getary discussions continue among elected federal dar Section, page 3. Please call or write Presi- ground weapons-related subcritical nuclear tests at officials in Washington, DC that blame the poor, dent Clinton to stop rhe scheduled under- the Nevada Test Site this June. The DOE says the the imprisoned, and the sick in our society for un- experiments will not produce a self-sustaining balanced budgets. It is a crime against humanity ground nuclear test June 18. (202) 456-1111, nuclear chain reaction, hence the term "subcrltical". that our nation's human, scientific and material re- 1600 Pennsylvania, Washington D.C. 20500 Various reports indicate each of these planned sources continue to be squandered by such forces. Since 1945, the world has lived under the cloud tests will detonate between 50 and 500 pounds of The SS&M should not be used to upgrade nuclear of over 2,000 nuclear tests. These tests have harmed high explosive charge and involve undisclosed weapons, but rather, should be used to eliminate, human health and the environment, squandered eco- amounts of special nuclear material, including bomb- safely, the nuclear stockpiles and nuclear waste. nomic resources and driven a dangerous arms race. grade plutonium. The DOE says the first two un- The NIF should not be constructed! The subcritical The nations of the world can and must reach agree- derground blasts, scheduled for this year, will not tests should be stopped! ment this year on a Comprehensive Test Ban (CTB) utilize actual nuclear warheads, warhead prototypes Treaty that will ban all nuclear tests worldwide.
  • FOR a FUTURE of Peketjiktice

    FOR a FUTURE of Peketjiktice

    WDMENS ENCAMPMENT FOR A FUTURE OF PEKEtJIKTICE SUMMER 1983'SENECA ARM/ DEPOTS 1590 WOMEN OF THE H0TINONSIONNE IROaiMS CONFEDERACY GATHER AT SENECA TO DEMAND AN END TO MMR AMONG THE NATIONS X 1800s A&0LITI0NIST5 M4KE SENECA COUNTY A MAJOR STOP ON THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD HITO HARRIET TUBMAW HOUSE NEAR THE PRESENT DAI ARMV DEPOTS EARL/ FEMINISTS HOLD FIRST WDMENS RIQHTS CONVENTION AT SENEGA FALLS ID CALL FOR SUFFRAGE & EQUAL MPTICJMTION IN ALL OTHEP AREAS OF LIFE ' TOD/W URBAN & RURA. WOMEN JOIN TOGETHER IN SENECA G0UNI7 TO CHALLENGE "ME NUCLEAR THREAT TO UFE ITSELF^ WE FOCUS ON THE WEAPONS AT 1UE SENECA ARMY DEPOT TO PREVENT DEPU)yMENT OF NATO MISSILES IN SOUDARITY WITH THE EUPOPE/W PEACE MO^MENT^ RESOURCE HANDBOOK Introduction The idea of a Women's Peace Camp in this country in solidarity with the Peace Camp movement in Europe and the Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp, in particular, was born at a Conference on Global Feminism and Disarmament on June 11, 1982. The organizing process began with discussions between Women's International League for Peace and Freedom and women in the Upstate Feminist Peace Alliance (NY), to consider siting the camp at the Seneca Army Depot in Romulus, NY. The planning meetings for the Encampment have since grown to include women from Toronto, Ottawa, Rochester, Oswego, Syracuse, Geneva, Ithaca, Albany, New York City, Boston, Philadelphia, and some of the smaller towns in between. Some of the tasks have been organized regionally and others have been done locally. Our planning meetings are open, and we are committed to consensus as our decision making process.
  • Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex

    Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex

    DOE/EIS-0387 Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex February 2011 U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Y-12 Site Office Volume II: Comment Response Document COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) TITLE: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex (DOE/EIS-0387) (Final Y-12 SWEIS) CONTACT: For further information on this SWEIS, For general information on the DOE contact: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Pam Gorman Carol Borgstrom, Director Y-12 SWEIS Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC-54 Y-12 Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 800 Oak Ridge Turnpike 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Suite A-500 Washington, DC 20585 Oak Ridge, TN 37830 (202) 586-4600 (865) 576-9903 or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756 (865) 483-2014 fax Abstract: NNSA, a separately organized agency within DOE, is responsible for maintaining the safety, reliability, and security of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile to meet national security requirements. NNSA manages nuclear weapons programs and facilities, including those at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This Final Y-12 SWEIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the reasonable alternatives for ongoing and foreseeable future operations and activities at Y-12, including alternatives for changes to site infrastructure and levels of operation (using production capacity as the key metric for comparison). Five alternatives are analyzed in this Y-12 SWEIS: (1) No Action Alternative (maintain the status quo); (2) Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Alternative; (3) Upgrade-in-Place Alternative; (4) Capability-sized UPF Alternative; and (5) No Net Production/Capability-sized UPF Alternative.
  • Nuclear Weapons Are Indiscriminate

    Nuclear Weapons Are Indiscriminate

    Copyright 2019 by Champion Briefs, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by an information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the publisher. The Evidence Standard Jan/Feb 2020 The Evidence Standard Speech and Debate provides a meaningful and educational experience to all who are involved. We, as educators in the community, believe that it is our responsibility to provide resources that uphold the foundation of the Speech and Debate activity. Champion Briefs, its employees, managers, and associates take an oath to uphold the following Evidence Standard: 1. We will never falsify facts, opinions, dissents, or any other information. 2. We will never knowingly distribute information that has been proven to be inaccurate, even if the source of the information is legitimate. 3. We will actively fight the dissemination of false information and will provide the community with clarity if we learn that a third-party has attempted to commit deception. 4. We will never knowingly support or distribute studies, news articles, or other materials that use inaccurate methodologies to reach a conclusion or prove a point. 5. We will provide meaningful clarification to any who question the legitimacy of information that we distribute. 6. We will actively contribute to students’ understanding of the world by using evidence from a multitude of perspectives and schools of thought. 7. We will, within our power, assist the community as a whole in its mission to achieve the goals and vision of this activity.
  • Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph

    Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph

    "If We ~aveEnouah weaDons to destrov the earth manv times over: Why Do We Build More?" by Andreas Toupadakis, Ph. D. unleashed power of the atom: "This ba- Science, which ought always to be Former Employee of both Los Alamos sic force of the universe cannot be fitted aiming at the good of humanity, is assist- National Laboratory and Lawrence into the outmoded concept of narrow ing in the work of destruction, and is con- Livermore National Laboratory nationalisms." The Lawrence Livermore stantly inventing new means for killing the This is an appeal to every secretary, National Laboratory's logo is: Science greatest number of people in the short- technician, custodian, scientist, engineer, in the National Interest. I believe that if est amount of time. This twentieth cen- and any other person whose participa- Albert Einstein were alive today, not only tury proved to be a century of inhuman tion supports the world war machine to would he not be working at LLNL, but slaughter. In the 1914 war, 15% of ca- withhold their skills fiom weapons work he would also be strongly condemning sualties were civilian; in 1939: 50%; in and from activities that support or en- its mission. And what is the logo of Los the wars fought in the 1950s: 75%; in able weapons work. Alamos National Laboratory? Science the 1990s: 90% of war casualties were "The unleashed power of the atom has Serving Society. Do the national labs civilian. Science that is used to terrorize changed evewngexcept our thinking. believe that they are serving society by people, kill them, or make them invalids Thus, we are drifting toward catastro- endangering its very existence through the is immoral science.
  • Nevada Test Site: Desert Annex of TESTS SINCE the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories 1945 Q Denotes “Subcritical” Introduction Test

    Nevada Test Site: Desert Annex of TESTS SINCE the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories 1945 Q Denotes “Subcritical” Introduction Test

    Western States Legal Foundation Nevada Desert Experience Information Bulletin Summer 2005 update 1,000+ U.S. NUCLEAR The Nevada Test Site: Desert Annex of TESTS SINCE the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories 1945 q denotes “subcritical” Introduction test Aardvark 1962 Abeytas 1970 The Nevada Test Site (NTS), an immense tract of desert and mountains northwest of Las Abilene 1988 Able 1946 Able 1951 Vegas, is the test range where the United States government set off over 900 nuclear Able 1951 Able 1952 explosions during the Cold War phase of the arms race. For most Americans, the Test Site is Abo 1985 Absinthe 1967 only a symbol of a closed chapter of history, a time of great danger that now is over. Even Ace 1964 Acushi 1963 those who know that the Nevada Test Site still is used for “subcritical” testing of nuclear Adobe 1962 Adze 1968 weapons materials and components underground may think operations largely have been Agile 1967 Agouti 1962 Agrini 1984 suspended, with unused facilities retained only against the eventuality of a return to full scale Ahtanum 1963 Ajax 1966 underground nuclear testing. But the Test Site remains an important part of the nuclear Ajo 1970 Akavi 1981 weapons complex, both a remote site where dangerous activities can be conducted with little Akbar 1972 Alamo 1988 public knowledge and a weapons laboratory unto itself. High risk programs involving nuclear Aleman 1986 Algodones 1971 material, such as nuclear criticality experiments, are slated for transfer to the Test Site, and it Aligote 1981 Aliment 1969 Allegheny 1962 also is being considered as a location for a proposed factory to mass produce plutonium pits, Alma 1962 Almendro 1973 the atomic explosive “triggers”at the core of most nuclear weapons.
  • Nuclear (In)Security in the Everyday: Peace Campers As Everyday

    Nuclear (In)Security in the Everyday: Peace Campers As Everyday

    SDI0010.1177/0967010618762595Security DialogueEschle 762595research-article2018 Article Security Dialogue 2018, Vol. 49(4) 289 –305 Nuclear (in)security in the © The Author(s) 2018 Reprints and permissions: everyday: Peace campers as sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618762595DOI: 10.1177/0967010618762595 everyday security practitioners journals.sagepub.com/home/sdi Catherine Eschle University of Strathclyde, UK Abstract This article extends the emergent focus on ‘the everyday’ in critical security studies to the topic of nuclear (in)security, through an empirical study of anti-nuclear peace activists understood as ‘everyday security practitioners’. In the first part of the article, I elaborate on the notion of everyday security practitioners, drawing particularly on feminist scholarship, while in the second I apply this framework to a case study of Faslane Peace Camp in Scotland. I show that campers emphasize the everyday insecurities of people living close to the state’s nuclear weapons, the blurred boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them’, and the inevitability of insecurity in daily life. Moreover, campers’ security practices confront the everyday reproduction of nuclear weapons and prefigure alternative modes of everyday life. In so doing, I argue, they offer a distinctive challenge to dominant deterrence discourse, one that is not only politically significant, but also expands understanding of the everyday in critical security studies. Keywords Anti-nuclear, critical security studies, the everyday, (in)security, feminism, peace movement Introduction This article explores the possibilities for rethinking nuclear (in)security in light of recent efforts to bring ‘the everyday’ into critical security studies. It does so with a feminist-informed analysis of the discourses and practices of anti-nuclear activists in one protest site, Faslane Peace Camp.
  • Close to Midnight CND General Secretary Kate Hudson Writes on How the US’ Nuclear Policy Is Taking Us Closer to War

    Close to Midnight CND General Secretary Kate Hudson Writes on How the US’ Nuclear Policy Is Taking Us Closer to War

    caTHE MAGAZINmE OF THE CAMPAIGN pFOR NUCLEAR DaISARMAMENT igFEBRUARY 2018 n Close to midnight CND General Secretary Kate Hudson writes on how the US’ nuclear policy is taking us closer to war. AST MONTH the Bulletin of Atomic of Evil. It also revisited some of the ideas Scientists moved us half a minute closer of the early 1990s, calling for the Lto Midnight. At two minutes to, it’s development of bunker-busters and mini- the closest since the height of the Cold War. nukes for use in ‘regional conflicts’, The reasons cited are increasing nuclear understood at that time – in the aftermath risk, climate change and potentially harmful of the first Gulf War and the developing emerging technologies. But nuclear takes narrative around oil and resources – to centre stage: reckless language and provoca - mean the Middle East. tive action by both US and North Korea. The advent of President Obama To make matters worse, the latest US temporarily knocked the project on the nuclear posture review has just been head. His 2010 review ruled out the released. These reviews can be a powerful development of new nuclear weapons, indicator of a president’s intentions and this including bunker-busters. It also renounced one will, no doubt, be a taste of things to nuclear weapons use against non-nuclear come. The 2002 version included President states that the US considered compliant Bush’s demand for contingency plans for with the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. the use of nuclear weapons against at least At the time we hoped for more, after seven countries, including the so-called Axis Obama’s passionate Prague speech in 2009, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, CND 60th celebration at Aldermaston 162 Holloway Rd, London N7 8DQ 1st April, assemble at 12 020 7700 2393 noon.
  • “No Ai Missili a Comiso, No Ai Missili in Europa!”

    “No Ai Missili a Comiso, No Ai Missili in Europa!”

    “NO AI MISSILI A COMISO, NO AI MISSILI IN EUROPA!” A case study of transnational contacts between Comiso (Sicily, Italy), Greenham Common (England) and the Dutch peace movement H.E. Wink MA Thesis | MA History, Specialisation Politics, Culture and National Identities Leiden University | 20 ECTS Supervisor: Dr. B.S. van der Steen | Second reader: Dr. D. Fazzi 29-06-2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Chapter 1: The emergence of the peace movement at Comiso ................................................ 14 Chapter 2: International involvement ...................................................................................... 19 Chapter 3: Local involvement .................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 4: Peace camps ........................................................................................................... 41 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 49 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................ 53 Translation of the title: “No to the missiles at Comiso, no to the missiles in Europe!” Image: International Institute of Social History: [Poster.] made by Opland, (call number IISG BG E9/598), via https://hdl.handle.net/10622/903B422B-BBE6-48B7-8FB4-733CB4BB406E.
  • Peace Psychology Newsletter of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association

    Peace Psychology Newsletter of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association

    PEACE Psychology Newsletter of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association Volume 18, Number 2, ASSN 1935 – 4894 • FALL/WINTER 2009 PEACE EDUCATION: Past, Present & Future Clockwise Fall/Winter from right: 2009 Montessori student exploring the world; 2009 Peace Camp Theme; Peace Camper sharesPEACE her feelings Psychology about camp. Contents From the Editor From the Editor ............................................2 Passing the Baton ........................................ 3 his is not the column I initially wrote Some Needed Changes ................................4 for this issue of the Peace Psychology New Blood, Same Dedication......................5 T Newsletter. I tossed that one in the trash (or rather in my computer’s recycle bin) Using Assets for Peace .................................6 once I heard the October 9th announcement Michael R. Recruiting New Division Members .............7 that President Barack Obama had received Hulsizer, Highlighting Student and Early Career the Nobel Peace Prize for “extraordinary ef- Editor Research .......................................................8 forts to strengthen international diplomacy Early Career Award 2010 Announcement ...10 and cooperation between peoples.” McCain went on to state, “I think all of us Peace Psychology Explores Peace with were surprised at the decision, but I think Justice at the 2009 APA Convention........11 I was initially surprised at the selection given Americans are always pleased when their it had been 90 years since a sitting President Solutions to Intergroup Conflict: Constructing president is recognized by something on Sustainable Webs of Peace Builders ............14 (Theodore Roosevelt, 1906 & Woodrow Wil- this order.” Governor Arnold Schwarzeneg- son, 1919) had received the Nobel Peace Prize. Invited Papers ger, R-Calif.
  • NDE's Sacred Peace Walk 2007 Packet

    NDE's Sacred Peace Walk 2007 Packet

    ***Sacred Peace Walk 2007 Welcome Packet*** Hello, Thanks so much for your interest in the 2007 Sacred Peace Walk! We are really excited that you are coming. In this packet you will find materials to help you prepare for the walk. Some items are logistical, others spiritual, others informational on the nuclear issue. We have also included more logistical information down at the bottom. We will be walking through a highly militarized zone: Nellis Airforce Base hosts 902 nuclear weapons; the Nellis Bombing Range and the Nevada Test Site have been site of Depleted Uranium testing and disposal; unmanned Predator planes which drop bombs in Iraq are controlled from Indian Springs; and the Test Site itself has seen 1,044 nuclear bombings. This summer will be the 10 th anniversary of the resumption of underground nuclear testing via subcritical tests under the Stockpile Stewardship program. Since the subcritical Unicorn test last August, the US has conducted four subcritical “thermos” tests involving small amounts of plutonium this year. Yet we will also be walking through the desert, a place of great holiness in many religious traditions. Thank you for bringing your healing power and your longing for healing to the Nevada desert, a place truly located between heaven and hell. We have enclosed: -Article “Walk in Peace for Peace” by Brian Kimmel (p. 3-4) -Overview of NDE and Desert Spirituality from Ken Butigan’s book Pilgrimage Through a Burning World (p. 5-7) -Article on Desert Spirituality: “Desert Attentiveness, Desert Indifference: Countercultural Spirituality in the Desert Fathers and Mothers” by Belden Lane (p.
  • Feminism and the Critique of Violence: Negotiating Feminist Political Agency HUTCHINGS, KJ; FRAZER, E

    Feminism and the Critique of Violence: Negotiating Feminist Political Agency HUTCHINGS, KJ; FRAZER, E

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online Feminism and the Critique of Violence: negotiating feminist political agency HUTCHINGS, KJ; FRAZER, E For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8044 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Elizabeth Frazer and Kimberly Hutchings Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (2) 2014: 143-163. ISSN 1356-9317/ 1469-9613. Feminism and the Critique of Violence: negotiating feminist political agency Abstract The acute sensitivity of feminism to violence, in its many different forms and contexts, makes it a particularly interesting case for the examination of the relationship between politics and violence in theory and practice. Our purpose in this paper is not to adjudicate the normative question of whether feminism implies a commitment to pacifism or to the use of non-violence. Rather, we are interested in examining how the relation between feminist politics and violence is construed as feminists struggle to develop a politics in which opposition to patriarchal violence is central. We begin with the feminist critique of violence, and move to examine how particular articulations of that critique shape and are shaped by practices of feminist political agency in specific contestation over the goals and strategies of feminism. We use the well-known case of feminist debates over the Greenham Common Peace Camp in the UK in the 1980s to demonstrate how negotiating women’s political agency in relation to opposition to male violence poses problems, both for feminists who embrace non-violence and prioritise the opposition to war, and for feminists who are suspicious of non-violence and of the association of feminism with peace activism.