80223-06 to 80404-06

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

80223-06 to 80404-06 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1]) by igcb.igc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA02011 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from 218lan85.iprolink.ch (218lan85.iprolink.ch [193.189.218.85]) by mail.iprolink.ch (ipl/ipl) with SMTP id SAA148594 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:31:07 +0200 Received: by 218lan85.iprolink.ch with Microsoft Mail id <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:36:47 +-200 Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: International Peace Bureau <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: NPT reception Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 17:19:03 +-200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 Dear Howard, You will be pleased to know that Michel Monod was at the Swiss mission = on Friday, and one of the issues he discussed was the reception in the = UN. The Swiss agreed to sponsor the event if it involves no financial = cost, which it doesn't. This will save only about 3 per cent of the = cost, however. We understand you have been in touch with David Atwood = about the funding; in case you are having difficulties in raising enough = 30330.03.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] money, we just wanted to let you know that there are cheaper menu = options available. You are probably already aware of the alternatives, = but if you would like us to send you the details, please let us know. Shall we go ahead with arranging for the Swiss to sign the relevant = papers? We don't know the procedure but suppose Edith or David do. Best wishes, Jo Tyler and Adam Berry * * * * * * * * * *=20 SPECIAL NGO COMMITTEE FOR DISARMAMENT Joint NGO Project for the Second Session of the NPT PrepComm * * * * * * * * * * c/o International Peace Bureau [email protected] tel: +41 22 731 64 29 fax: +41 22 738 94 19 41 rue de Zurich CH - 1201 Geneva Switzerland NGO Committee Secretariat: [email protected] 30330.03.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] 30330.03.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from igc3.igc.apc.org (igc3.igc.org [192.82.108.33]) by igcb.igc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA22056; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 22:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by igc3.igc.apc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA22202; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 22:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ppp4-24.igc.org ([email protected]) by igc3.igc.apc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA22049; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 22:09:21 -0800 (PST) Cc: [email protected] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 22:09:21 -0800 (PST) From: michael mariotte <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk Sender: [email protected] Subject: Re: oppose n-power as well as n-weapons? To: Graham Daniell <[email protected]>, DavidMcR <[email protected]> X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) X-Sender: [email protected] X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Graham, I know we both agree on the fundamental issues here, and since NIRS is not a 30331.01.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] major player in A2000, I hesitate a little to even continue to expressing my views... Nonetheless, what you are saying may well be true in some countries, but not in others. As IPPNW has pointed out, nuclear power is the bete noire in Germany, not weapons. In France, it's the opposite. In the U.S., getting rid of both has widespread public appeal, but no support among policymakers or the media. I guess my basic argument is this: let each country decide how best to handle this issue, but, as the A2000 statement I think makes clear, that WE are all united in wanting to end both. I don't think this is an either/or issue, I think it's a tactical issue. But, by the way, it wouldn't take even 10 years to replace nuclear reactors--in most cases, almost everywhere in the world, they represent expensive and unnecessary overcapacity. We could close 80% of the 104 reactors now operable in the U.S. tomorrow, and no one would ever notice. The same is true in most countries (France an obvious exception, and not every reactor in every country could close tomorrow, but you get the idea...). Don't be deceived by the industry propaganda that they are somehow necessary to keep our lights on and beer cold; that is demonstrably untrue for the vast majority of them.... Michael Mariotte NIRS 30331.01.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] At 06:14 AM 3/25/98 +0800, Graham Daniell wrote: >Dear David and friends, > >Nobody here has said that there is NOT a link between nuclear weapons and >nuclear power. Nobody has said that we should NOT oppose nuclear power as >well as nuclear weapons. > >The debate has only been about whether we have to get OTHER people (the man >in the street, politicians etc) to accept the abolition of nuclear weapons >AND nuclear power at THE SAME TIME. I personally believe that many people >who support nuclear power (and who perhaps depend on it for the electricity >that come into their homes), nevertheless are scared to hell about nuclear >weapons, and would love to see them banned (perhaps someone has some poll >data on this?). My contention is that if you attach the banning of nuclear >power to the banning of n-weapons, it makes the package harder for many to >accept, at least at first. > >Once they have committed to banning the weapons, it is my contention that >people will make the connection themselves (we can help them do it!) and >realise that in order to make the ban permanent them must ban nuclear power >as well. > >But just for a moment, lets consider that we could convince people to ban >both in one package. Has anyone here thought about how long it would take >to build alternative power generating facilities to replace all those >nuclear power stations? This would probably take 20-30 years, and if the >two issues were bound together, nuclear weapons proponents could use this 30331.01.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] >tactic to delay the banning of nuclear weapons for years! > >But if we separate the two issues, nuclear wepons could be de-targetted >overnight, and dismantled and destroyed in only a year or two (if we put our >mind to it). > >Towards a nuclear-free millennium, >Graham Daniell >Perth, Western Australia >[email protected] >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >At 01:01 24/03/98 EST, you wrote: >>I think the debate is healthy. I have nothing special to contribute that >>hasn't been said, but did want to say War Resisters League has long felt, >>strongly, there is a link between nuclear power and nuclear weapons. In this >>sense we support the position of Janet, the IPPN, etc. etc. as stated in >>recent days. >> >>Peace, >>David McReynolds >> >> > >Graham Daniell >Western Australia >[email protected] 30331.01.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] > > 30331.01.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by igc7.igc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17699; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from kds5.kivex.com (kds5.kivex.com [204.177.32.2]) by igc7.igc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA15099 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:22:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from psrcomm4.psr.org (pc40.psrus.org [204.177.54.40]) by kds5.kivex.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA29411 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:20:12 -0500 (EST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 15:51:40 -0500 X-UIDL: 889188740.001 From: Kathy Crandall <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Organization: Disarmament Clearinghouse Precedence: bulk Sender: [email protected] Subject: RADIO CALL IN 3/23 To: [email protected] X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) Status: U X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 RADIO CALL-IN ACTION ALERT on THE CTBT 30806.01.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 March 23rd is the 6-month anniversary of President Clinton's delivery of the CTBT to the U.S. Senate. The treaty is languishing in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee being held hostage by Chairman Jesse Helms (R-NC) **TAKE ACTION -- RADIO CALL-IN ** We need to urge members of the committee to insist on hearings in the near future. We encourage as many people as possible in the following states to call into their local radio talk shows on *March 23rd* and urge your Senators to take action on the ratification of the CTBT! STATES WHERE CALL-IN IS URGED: Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Tennnessee,Wyoming Please urge calls into radio stations on MARCH 23rd and to ratify the CTBT.

  1099
Recommended publications
  • Newcastles of the World Newsletter March-April 2021
    Newcastles News March - April 2021 Sent by email to over 2500 people and organisations in over 50 “ Newcastles” - please share it with your contacts too! TUNE INTO NEWCASTLES AROUND THE WORLD ! Radio Garden is a free app which connects to 30,000 radio stations from around the world and offers access to music and news from the rest of the globe. It was created a few years ago, but there has been a huge increase in the number of users during the current COVID-19 confinement. Why not try it out? - click on http://radio.garden/ You can rotate the globe and tune in to radio stations across the world. The spots on the map increase in size with the number of broadcasters available in that location. Just click on “play”. To make it easier for you we've selected stations in or close to our main partner "Newcastles" (below) for you to tune in to ! See page 2 BIENÁLE ZÁMKY PROGRAMME EXTENDED Because of Covid-19. it has been an utterly frustrating year of stop/start for the Vzdusné Zámky project, the year in which Nové Zámky, our Newcastle in Slovakia, celebrated its selection as the country’s City of Culture. As we write, it is reported that the situation in Slovakia is still not improving and the future is uncertain. With great patience, the organisers are again moving back the dates of scheduled events and programmes, communicating with artists, looking for support for foreign guests and most importantly, giving appreciation to the Slovak national Art Support Fund, for now extending the duration of the City of Culture until August.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation 4 May 2005
    NPT/CONF.2005/Misc.1 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation 4 May 2005 of Nuclear Weapons Original: English New York, 25 April-May 2005 PROVISIONAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS (Subject to corrections) ∗ I. STATES PARTIES ALBANIA Address: Permanent Mission of the Republic of Albania to the United Nations 320 East 79th Street, New York, N.Y. 10021 Telephone: (212) 249-2059 Mr. Agim Nesho Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative to the United Nations Head of Delegation Mr. Lublin Dilja Minister Plenipotentiary Permanent Mission Alternate member Mr. Ilir Melo Minister Counselor Permanent Mission Alternate member Ms. Elvina Jusufaj Second Secretary Permanent Mission Alternate member __________________ ∗ Corrections to be submitted to Room S-3140. 05-33749 (E) 090505 *0533749* NPT/CONF.2005/Misc.1 ALGERIA Address: Permanent Mission of Algeria to the United Nations 326 East 48th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 750-1960 M. Hocine Meghlaoui Secrétaire Général du Ministère des affaires etrangères Chef de la délégation M. Abdallah Baali Ambassadeur Représentant Permanent auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M. Noureddine Bendjaballah Commissaire à l’Energie Atomique Membre M. Abdelaziz Lahiouel Directeur des Affaires politiques Internationales au MAE Membre M. Mourad Benmehidi Ambassadeur Représentant Permanent Adjoint auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M. Larbi Alioua Conseiller auprès du Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique Membre M. Mohamed Belaoura Sous-directeur du Désarmement et des Questions de Sécurité Régionale au MAE Membre M. Larbi El Hadj Ali Ministre Plénipotentiaire près la Mission Permanente auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 World Conference Against a and H Bombs
    Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs 原水爆禁止2019年世界大会 2-4-4 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8464 Japan Tel: 03-5842-6034 Fax: 03-5842-6033 E-mail: [email protected] November 2019 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 3-9, 2019 2019 World Conference against A & H Bombs H & A against Conference World 2019 Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs DIC-2063 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 3-9, 2019 Main Theme: For a Nuclear Weapon-Free, Peaceful and Just World Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs Table of Contents Declaration of the International Meeting………………………………………………….. 1 Letter from Nagasaki to All National Governments………………….………………….…4 International Meeting, 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs…………………5 Opening Session (August 3) ………………………………………………………………..…… 5 Address of the Organizer: Noguchi Kunikazu, Organizing Committee of the World Conference Greetings on behalf of the Hibakusha: Hamasumi Jiro, Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations (Nihon Hidankyo) Special Report by the Government Representative: George-Wilhelm Gallhofer, Minister, Head of Unit for Nuclear Weapons, IAEA, CTBTO and NPT, Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs, Austria Messages from Heads/Leaders of National Governments and International Organizations …... 12 Plenary Session I: “Damage and Suffering from A-Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; Inhumanity of Nuclear Weapons; Struggle of the
    [Show full text]
  • Last Ned Hele Bladet I PDF-Format
    Medlemsblad for IPPNW Norge Nr. 1 - 2008 - Årgang 26 Norske leger mot atomvåpen ICAN-underskrifter levert til UD Er thoriumkraftverk svaret for fremtiden? Lite nytt fra FNs førstekomité en tryggere verden uten atomvåpen Norsk avdeling av International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War IPPNW Leder Oppgaver for NLA i 2008 Tordis Sørensen Høifødt den politiske og militære konsekvens gjør noen av dette landets store ut- Leder NLA økt spenning og opprustning. Vi støt- fordringer. [email protected] ter Norge sin kritiske røst og håper den kan opprettholdes i et ellers Kampanjen for en konvensjon som ganske ukritisk NATO. NLA vil i sa- forbyr atomvåpen, ICAN, var et Siden siste nummer av medlemsb- marbeid med NGOer forsøke å sette viktig tema på konferansen og står ladet har NLA hatt årsmøte og det spesielt fokus på rakettskjoldsaken i sentralt i arbeidet framover. Arbei- har vært verdenskongress for IPPNW den nærmeste tida. Vi har allerede gitt det for å få tilslutning til en konven- (International Physicians for the Pre- innspill til Stortingsmeldingen om sjon fra alle verdens land, ikke minst vention of Nuclear War) i New Del- sikkerhet og nedrusting og vil følge de ledende atomvåpenstatene, vil hi. opp dette når meldingen kommer opp kreve innsats både gjennom politiske i Stortinget rett før sommeren eller til kanaler og folkeopinionen. Like fullt ”Leger advarer mot rakettskjold. høsten. har kampanjen allerede gitt inspiras- Forholdene mellom atommaktene er jon til ny innsats i mange land, også mer spent enn på lenge. Verdens mil- Under kongressen i Delhi fikk vi hos oss. itærutgifter har økt med 40 % over vite at India bruker stadig mer av Arbeidet med å forebygge de mange skader av håndvåpen på verdensbasis “Norge har ved flere anledninger ytret seg kritisk står fortsatt sentralt i det internas- om rakettskjoldet.
    [Show full text]
  • 03("/*4"4+0/&/ /&* 5*- "50.7∞1&/ @HFH D @HGF
    ORGANISASJONEN NEI TIL ATOMVÅPEN 1979 — 1987 ——————–—————– Hovedoppgave i historie Irene Valvik Vågen Universitetet i Bergen Mai 2002 ________________________________________________________________________ Innholdsfortegnelse ________________________________________________________________________ Forord Forkortelser Kapittel 1 – Innledning .................................................................................1 Problemstilling.........................................................................................................3 Tidligere forskning..................................................................................................4 Primærkilder ............................................................................................................7 Kapittel 2 – Bakgrunn...................................................................................9 Den første bølgen med atomvåpenprotester ............................................................9 Ideologiske forløpere.............................................................................................15 Forholdet mellom USA og Sovjetunionen ............................................................17 Oppsummering ......................................................................................................23 Kapittel 3 – Organisasjonen og dens utvikling......................................... 25 Nei til nye Atomvåpen...........................................................................................25 Fra ad hoc aksjon til
    [Show full text]
  • Endorsers and Co-Sponsors of the Signature Campaign for the Swift
    Endorsers and Co-sponsors of the Signature Campaign for the Swift Abolition of Nuclear Weapons From 19 countries: 44national organizations and 6 individuals and 9 international/ regional organizations, plus 2 representatives of national governments/inter-governmental organizations (please note that plural endorsers from one organization are not counted as individual endorsers). (As of January23, 2006) International & Regional Organizations Cora Weiss, President Yes, I will support this campaign. ◆Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)/ Susi Snyder, Secretary General ◆Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear I do hope that you are well, and looking forward to the Power in Space/ Bruce K. Gagnon, Coordinator new year. The Women's International League for Yes please do use our name. Good luck. Peace and Freedom (WILPF) after careful consideration, wholeheartedly endorses this ◆Women’s International Democratic Federation/ campaign. Please let me know where I should direct Marcia Campos, Chairperson our members to send signed appeals, and what else we can do to support these efforts. ◆International Secretariat Committee of Nuclear Free Zone Local Authorities/ Stewart Kemp, ◆WILPF/ Edith Ballantyne, UN Special advisor Secretary Please add my name to the appeal. Of course, I fully It is not possible for me to draw this to the attention of support it. colleagues at such short notice but Nuclear Free Local Authority policy supports the abolition of nuclear ◆Abolition Now Campaign of the Abolition 2000 weapons. Therefore I can convey the support of our Global Network to Eliminate Nuclear Weapons/ organisation for your initiative. Janet Bloomfield, Convenor Thank you for this initiative. The Abolition Now ◆Latin America and the Caribbean Nonviolence campaign supports your efforts and will link to your International/ petition on our website as we did with the previous Andrés Thomas Conteris, Program Director petition.
    [Show full text]
  • Sosialistisk Ungdom Brudd Etter Brudd
    Demonstrasjon mot den britiske statsminister Margaret Thatcher under hennes besøk i Norge 11. september 1986. Tri Ne s. jaNseN Sosialistisk Ungdom Brudd etter brudd s osialistisk Ungdom (sU) er ungdomsorganisasjonen til sosialistisk Venstreparti. ifølge sin egen selvforståelse er sU en revolusjonær sosia- listisk og feministisk organisasjon som kjemper for et sosialistisk folke- styre i Norge. sU ble stiftet i februar 1975, etter at ungdomspartiene til sosialistisk Folkeparti (sF), arbeiderbevegelsens informasjonskomité mot norsk medlemskap i eF (aiK), Demokratiske sosialister (Ds) og Norges Kommunistiske Parti (NKP) siden 1973 hadde snust på mulig- heten for et felles ungdomsforbund samtidig som deres moderpartier hadde etablert sosialistisk Valgforbund. Da partiene sF, aiK-Ds og enkeltmedlemmer fra NKP senere i 1975 gikk sammen og dannet sosia- listisk Venstreparti (sV), besluttet sU seg for å være bare sVs ungdoms- organisasjon. Denne artikkelen trekker forhistorien enda lenger tilbake og prøver å vise at dagens sU har sin politiske og organisatoriske start i begynnelsen av 1960-årene. artikkelen er for øvrig et første forsøk på å skrive en samlet fremstilling av sUs historie. Kildesituasjonen har vært en utfor- dring da kildematerialet er fragmentert. Kun noe materiale fra ungdoms- organisasjonen har vært bevart gjennom moderpartienes arkiver, men spesielt for perioden fra 1980-årene og fremover har det ikke hittil vært bevart noe eget samlet arkiv.1 SF og Ungdomskomiteen i 1961 ble sosialistisk Folkeparti dannet hovedsakelig av en gruppe ekskludert fra arbeiderpartiet. i sFs vedtekter stod det at «Partiet består av bostedslag og ungdomslag» som ble sett på som partiets «grunn- organisasjoner».2 Partiet nedsatte videre en ungdomskomité som skulle 87 a rbeiDerhisTorie 2011 sørge for at alle sF-lag rundt om i landet oppnevnte en kontaktperson for ungdomsarbeidet.
    [Show full text]
  • <[email protected]
    Return-Path: <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 15:35:12 -0400 From: Dave Robinson <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: Pax Christi on India and Nuclear Weapons States To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> X-Envelope-To: <[email protected]> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by igc7.igc.org id MAA26788 May 20, 1998 Contact: Dave Robinson 814-453-4955, Ext. 235 PAX CHRISTI USA CONDEMNS INDIAN TESTING AND HYPOCRISY OF OTHER NUCLEAR WEAPONS STATES ERIE, PA. - Adding Pax Christi USA's voice to the chorus of world condemnation about India's nuclear testing is critical, and equally critical is denouncing the hypocrisy of the other nuclear weapons states' reliance on nuclear deterrence, says one of the organization's leaders. "While we feel it's necessary for Pax Christi USA to publicly denounce India's decision to test nuclear weapons, we're also compelled to cry out against the hypocrisy and culpability of the other nuclear weapons states' continued reliance on nuclear deterrence," says Dave Robinson, program director at the Erie-Pa.-based headquarters of Pax Christi USA, the national Catholic peace orga nization. Quoting from a joint statement of Pax Christi International President Godfried Cardinal Danneels and World Council of Churches General Secretary Rev. Dr. Konrad Raiser, issued from Geneva just two weeks before the Indian tests, Pax Christi condemned the doctrine of nuclear deterrence and expressed "grave concern" over India's apparent embracing of "this morally corrupt" doctrine. "The choice", states Pax Christi USA, "is between a nuclear-weapons-free world for all, and a nuclear weapons free-for-all.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Npt List of Participants.Doc
    2005 Review Conference of the Parties NPT/CONF.2005/INF.6 25 May 2005 to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation ORIGINAL: ENGLISH/FRENCH/ of Nuclear Weapons SPANISH ______________________________________________________________________________ New York, 25 April - May 2005 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS I. STATES PARTIES AFGHANISTAN Address: Permanent Mission of Afghanistan to the United Nations 360 Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 972-1212 Mr. A.G. Ravan A. G. Farhâdi. Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative to the United Nations Head of Delegation Mr. Salahuddin Rabbani Counsellor Permanent Mission Mr. Shah Mohammad Niazi First Secretary Permanent Mission ALBANIA Address: Permanent Mission of the Republic of Albania to the United Nations 320 East 79th Street, New York, N.Y. 10021 Telephone: (212) 249-2059 2 Mr. Agim Nesho Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative to the United Nations Head of Delegation Mr. Lublin Dilja Minister Plenipotentiary Permanent Mission Alternate member Mr. Ilir Melo Minister Counsellor Permanent Mission Alternate member Ms. Elvina Jusufaj Second Secretary Permanent Mission Alternate member ALGERIA Address: Permanent Mission of Algeria to the United Nations 326 East 48th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 750-1960 M. Hocine Meghlaoui Secrétaire Général du Ministère des Affaires étrangères Chef de la délégation M. Abdallah Baali Ambassadeur Extraordinaire et Plénipotentiaire Représentant Permanent auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M. Noureddine Bendjaballah Commissaire à l’Energie Atomique Membre M. Abdelaziz Lahiouel Directeur des Affaires politiques Internationales au Ministère des Affaires étrangères Membre 3 M. Mourad Benmehidi Ambassadeur Extraordinaire et Plénipotentiaire Représentant Permanent Adjoint auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M.
    [Show full text]
  • Back from the Brink - Strategy Session
    BACK FROM THE BRINK - STRATEGY SESSION Monday, February 7 1:15pm-5pm (Refreshments Provided) Conference Room # 2 - Methodist Building - 110 Maryland Avenue, NE AGENDA 1:15pm - 1:30pm - Overview of the Back From the Brink Campaign/ Goals for the meeting. 1:30 - 2pm - The De-alerting Issue (Bruce Blair/Brookings Institution - ArjunMakhijani/Back From the Brink) What is the de-alerting process we are proposing? How does de-alerting connect to other disarmament issues? What are the responses to attacks on de-alerting? 2- 2:40pm - Congress and Administration (Daryl Kimball, Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers) Developing political goals and a focus for grassroots pressure. 2:45 - 5pm - Grassroots Organizing - What organizations are planning on de-alerting - New organizing ideas for community education (video, public forums, etc.) - Elections and NPT Conference - Outreach to other constituencies - Media - Web Site - Funding Proposals for grassroots projects - Elite Strategy (speaker's tours, media, etc.) Please RSVP to: Ira Shorr Back From the Brink, Coordinator 301-588-8923 e.mail: [email protected] Visit our web site at: www.dealert.org Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:49:09 -0500 From: Robert Casad <[email protected]> Subject: Re: reunion Sender: Robert Casad <[email protected]> To: "Howard W. Hallman" <[email protected]> Thanks for your prompt reply. I have written to the others, but in the press of other things didn't get them mailed today. They will go out tomorrow. Best regards, Bob 00128.06.txt[5/3/2017 4:53:11 PM] X-eGroups-Return:
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear, and the Cold War of the 1980S
    Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear, and the Cold War of the 1980s ECKART CONZE Philipps-Universita¨t Marburg MARTIN KLIMKE New York University Abu Dhabi JEREMY VARON The New School .256579CC, 423:586 846 23:5861:6:C/2:02C,,D364CCC9623:5866 C67D622:2362C9CC, 423:586 846C6 9CC,5: 8 One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, ny 10006,usa Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107136281 © Cambridge University Press 2017 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2017 Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Inc A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conze, Eckart, editor. | Klimke, Martin, editor. | Varon, Jeremy, 1969– editor. Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear and the Cold War of the 1980s / Eckart Conze, Philipps-University Marburg; Martin Klimke, New York University, Abu Dhabi; Jeremy Varon, Eugene Lang College, The New School. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, [2017] | Series: Publications of the German Historical Institute | “This book originated in a global conference in 2010, “Accidental Armageddons: The Nuclear Crisis and the Culture of the Second Cold War, 1975–1989.” Hosted by the German Historical Institute (GHI), the gathering was co-sponsored by New York University, the National Security Archive, and the New School for Social Research/Eugene Lang College”–Acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • <[email protected]> Date
    Return-Path: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:50:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alice Slater <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: Working Group Convenor for Weapons Usable Radioactive Materials To: [email protected] X-Sender: [email protected] Dear Friends, I recently posted an enrollment form for our "1000 NGOs Campaign by the PrepCom" which listed our Working Group convenors and left a blank space for the Fissile Materials Working Group. I was just reminded by Martin Kalinowski that he volunteered to be the Convenor for the Abolition 2000 Working Group on Fissile Materials which we will now call Weapons Usable Radioactive Materials in order to include tritium, which is not fissionable but IS fusionable and a weapons-usable radioactive material. If you want to participate with this group, contact Martin below: Martin Kalinowski, IANUS, c/o Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstr. 9, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany Tel.: +49-6151-163016 FAX: +49-6151-166039 Internet, private: [email protected] Internet, group: [email protected] http://www.th-darmstadt.de/ze/ianus/welcome.htm and .../inesap.htm 101.01.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Authentication-Warning: igc2.igc.apc.org: majordomo set sender to [email protected] using -f Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT) From: NGO Committee on Disarmament <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: land mine abolition To: [email protected] To abolitionists of nuclear weapons, You all would be well advised to take a look at the treaty just agreed at Oslo, boldly banning anti-personnel land mines.
    [Show full text]