Closing Session (August 5)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Closing Session (August 5) Closing Session (August 5) Presentation by National Government perceived utility of these weapons, and thus their Representative: desirability. Nuclear and non-nuclear States are both concerned by the probabilities of nuclear Miguel Ruiz-Cabañas Izquierdo proliferation. Therefore, I would like to reiterate Ambassador to Japan, United Mexican States the consistent position taken by Mexico and the New Agenda Coalition countries (consisting of Ladies and gentlemen, Brazil, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand, As a representative of the Government of South Africa and Sweden), during the Preparatory Mexico, I feel very much honored to participate in Committee for the 2010 Review Conference of the this important event which has become a Parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty cornerstone of the Japanese campaign in favor of (NPT), celebrated from April 30 to May 11, 2007: the abolition of nuclear weapons. It is imperative that all States Parties be held fully I also wish to transmit the message of solidarity accountable with respect to strict compliance with delivered by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of their obligations adopted during the 2000 Review Mexico, Mrs. Patricia Espinosa Cantellano, to the Conference of the NPT. Japanese people, and particularly to the citizens of The emerging doctrines emphasizing the Hiroshima and Nagasaki. importance of nuclear weapons not only to defense The Government of Mexico has been but also the offensive capabilities of States, by historically engaged with the causes of nuclear expanding the range of possible scenarios for use, disarmament and non-proliferation of nuclear act as an incentive for nuclear weapon States to weapons, and in this spirit wishes to reiterate to develop new ones. The New Agenda Coalition the people and the Government of Japan its strong countries have underlined that States must refrain conviction on the need of total and definitive from developing nuclear weapons and must not elimination of nuclear weapons. These weapons adopt doctrines or systems that blur the distinction should not exist and neither constitute a threat to between nuclear and conventional weapons, or the life of all living beings in our planet due to their lower the nuclear threshold. very existence. Mexico has insisted that the preference of some The thousands of people that died because of countries to preserve the nuclear option as a key the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki component for their defense constitutes a trend in 1945, demand that the international community that can encourage other countries to modernize takes concrete actions and effective commitments their weapons and might lead to nuclear for assuring that such tragedy will never occur development by currently non nuclear states in again, and for avoiding nuclear weapons as part of order to gain deterrence capabilities. national defense policies and international security In this regard, my country welcomes the doctrines. actions of the British Government for the sake of a Mexico deplores the passing away of Mr. Iccho collective commitment against nuclear weapons by Ito, former Mayor of Nagasaki, and reiterates its reducing its own nuclear arsenals. Mexico condolences for the tragic act that ended the life of encourages this country and the international a distinguished and unflagging promoter of community to continue adopting creative and international peace that was always considered as significant policies as a testimony of the political a friend of Mexico. will of the States to construct a safe, peaceful and Mexico recognizes the heightened threat posed just world. by the access to mass destruction weapons by non- Mexico has contributed to the international state actors such as terrorist groups, and thus has community efforts in the field of non-proliferation contributed to the international efforts to eliminate in order to enhance international instruments on this risk. Nevertheless, it is also true that this fight this issue, and has also initiated an examination has not been accompanied by efforts directed process of the political mechanisms for trade towards nuclear disarmament. In this regard, my control, such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group. In country considers that the chances to reduce the this regard, Mexico has encouraged countries risk of proliferation depend on the possibility to engaged in nuclear activities to fulfill the effectively advance in the area of nuclear international commitments agreed in the disarmament. Disarmament and non-proliferation framework of the non-proliferation global regime. are mutually reinforcing processes. Genuine Now is time to look for alternative formulas to implementation of irreversible, verifiable and advance the disarmament agenda and to break the transparent nuclear weapon reductions, leading to impasse that prevails in the organizations dealing their total elimination, serves to diminish the with disarmament, especially in the Conference on Disarmament, the only multilateral disarmament Reports from Workshops: negotiating forum of the international community. Mexico encourages initiatives focused on the Workshop 1: “For the Swift Abolition abolition of nuclear weapons tests. In this regard, the Mexican Government underlines the of Nuclear Weapons” importance and urgency to achieve the early entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Beatrice Lemoine Treaty (CTBT) and exhorts all the States to uphold French Peace Movement and maintain moratorium on nuclear weapon test explosions, as well as to promote the installation of In the Workshop One: “For the Abolition of the international monitoring system of the Treaty. Nuclear Weapons,” 30 people in total took the Mexico has continued encouraging greater floor, including one question and answer, and one political coordination, as well as the strengthening message. First of all, we, chairpersons, wished the of Nuclear Weapons-Free-Zone regimes. As part workshop would be an opportunity to find of this effort, in April 2005, Mexico hosted the first practical ways to pursue the abolition of nuclear Conference of States that are Party or Signatory to weapons. It perhaps differed from what we first treaties that establish Nuclear Weapons-Free expected, but I leant from this workshop that if we Zones. We will call upon the nuclear States to fail to abolish nuclear weapons, we would be give total guarantees that they will adhere to such abolished. regimes and will avoid using their nuclear arsenals During the first half of the workshop: against the members of these Zones of peace, - A participant from Yamanashi said that the stability, and hope. greatest lie in the world is that peace comes My country has promoted the construction of a because of nuclear weapons. But he stressed peaceful and safe world. We are entirely that nothing is more important than human committed with the objectives of disarmament and lives; non-proliferation under the effective compliance of - The one from Niigata said that in order to the principles of transparency, verification and make Japan declare a nuclear free zone, his irreversibility. organization has met 61% of mayors and local Mexico will insist on the urgency to give strict authorities to support this movement, and 200 compliance to legally binding instruments calling celebrities signed to express their support, but for nuclear disarmament such as the Treaty on the it’s not enough. So his organization continues Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), to send postcards, which calls on Japan to and will firmly continue encouraging total and declare a nuclear-free zone, to the prime definitive elimination of nuclear weapons during minister; the 62nd session of the General Assembly of the - An Indian friend told us that there are 2 United Nations, the preparatory process for the aspects. One is non-proliferation, and the 2010 NPT Review Conference, the General other is the abolition of nuclear weapons. The Conference of the International Atomic Energy first one is important, whereas we have to Agency, and other international fora. spend time to management of non- Please accept the message of solidarity of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. India made Government of Mexico to the people and the the choice of non-nuclear weapons, so it’s Government of Japan and our most sincere possible for the world also to make the same; acknowledgement and support to your valuable - Some people emphasized the importance to works towards worldwide abolition of nuclear hold talks with young people, and some spoke weapons. Thank you. about nuclear accidents, and their movement to prevent their country from having nuclear weapons. One mentioned that it would be a great idea to concentrate particular activities on the USA, because it is an important place. For example, to carry an opinion-ad on newspapers like The Washington Post or New York Times to inform Americans of the tragedy of nuclear weapons; - Many Japanese participants in anger referred to the former Japanese Defense Minister who said, “Dropping of atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was inevitable”; - A friend from the Hiroshima-Nagasaki Peace Committee of the District of Columbia suggested that peace activists urgently adopt recommendations set forth by Blix favor of nuclear materials. Thus, there is a Commission; defect of democracy in Norway, this delegate - About nuclear non-proliferation, one pointed out; suggested that we focus on profits of - We can also have a campaign against nuclear murderers and find ways how
Recommended publications
  • 80223-06 to 80404-06
    Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1]) by igcb.igc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA02011 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from 218lan85.iprolink.ch (218lan85.iprolink.ch [193.189.218.85]) by mail.iprolink.ch (ipl/ipl) with SMTP id SAA148594 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:31:07 +0200 Received: by 218lan85.iprolink.ch with Microsoft Mail id <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 18:36:47 +-200 Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: International Peace Bureau <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: NPT reception Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 17:19:03 +-200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 Dear Howard, You will be pleased to know that Michel Monod was at the Swiss mission = on Friday, and one of the issues he discussed was the reception in the = UN. The Swiss agreed to sponsor the event if it involves no financial = cost, which it doesn't. This will save only about 3 per cent of the = cost, however. We understand you have been in touch with David Atwood = about the funding; in case you are having difficulties in raising enough = 30330.03.txt[5/3/2017 12:00:44 PM] money, we just wanted to let you know that there are cheaper menu = options available.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 World Conference Against a and H Bombs
    Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs 原水爆禁止2019年世界大会 2-4-4 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8464 Japan Tel: 03-5842-6034 Fax: 03-5842-6033 E-mail: [email protected] November 2019 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 3-9, 2019 2019 World Conference against A & H Bombs H & A against Conference World 2019 Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs DIC-2063 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 3-9, 2019 Main Theme: For a Nuclear Weapon-Free, Peaceful and Just World Organizing Committee World Conference against A and H Bombs Table of Contents Declaration of the International Meeting………………………………………………….. 1 Letter from Nagasaki to All National Governments………………….………………….…4 International Meeting, 2019 World Conference against A and H Bombs…………………5 Opening Session (August 3) ………………………………………………………………..…… 5 Address of the Organizer: Noguchi Kunikazu, Organizing Committee of the World Conference Greetings on behalf of the Hibakusha: Hamasumi Jiro, Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations (Nihon Hidankyo) Special Report by the Government Representative: George-Wilhelm Gallhofer, Minister, Head of Unit for Nuclear Weapons, IAEA, CTBTO and NPT, Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs, Austria Messages from Heads/Leaders of National Governments and International Organizations …... 12 Plenary Session I: “Damage and Suffering from A-Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; Inhumanity of Nuclear Weapons; Struggle of the
    [Show full text]
  • Last Ned Hele Bladet I PDF-Format
    Medlemsblad for IPPNW Norge Nr. 1 - 2008 - Årgang 26 Norske leger mot atomvåpen ICAN-underskrifter levert til UD Er thoriumkraftverk svaret for fremtiden? Lite nytt fra FNs førstekomité en tryggere verden uten atomvåpen Norsk avdeling av International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War IPPNW Leder Oppgaver for NLA i 2008 Tordis Sørensen Høifødt den politiske og militære konsekvens gjør noen av dette landets store ut- Leder NLA økt spenning og opprustning. Vi støt- fordringer. [email protected] ter Norge sin kritiske røst og håper den kan opprettholdes i et ellers Kampanjen for en konvensjon som ganske ukritisk NATO. NLA vil i sa- forbyr atomvåpen, ICAN, var et Siden siste nummer av medlemsb- marbeid med NGOer forsøke å sette viktig tema på konferansen og står ladet har NLA hatt årsmøte og det spesielt fokus på rakettskjoldsaken i sentralt i arbeidet framover. Arbei- har vært verdenskongress for IPPNW den nærmeste tida. Vi har allerede gitt det for å få tilslutning til en konven- (International Physicians for the Pre- innspill til Stortingsmeldingen om sjon fra alle verdens land, ikke minst vention of Nuclear War) i New Del- sikkerhet og nedrusting og vil følge de ledende atomvåpenstatene, vil hi. opp dette når meldingen kommer opp kreve innsats både gjennom politiske i Stortinget rett før sommeren eller til kanaler og folkeopinionen. Like fullt ”Leger advarer mot rakettskjold. høsten. har kampanjen allerede gitt inspiras- Forholdene mellom atommaktene er jon til ny innsats i mange land, også mer spent enn på lenge. Verdens mil- Under kongressen i Delhi fikk vi hos oss. itærutgifter har økt med 40 % over vite at India bruker stadig mer av Arbeidet med å forebygge de mange skader av håndvåpen på verdensbasis “Norge har ved flere anledninger ytret seg kritisk står fortsatt sentralt i det internas- om rakettskjoldet.
    [Show full text]
  • 03("/*4"4+0/&/ /&* 5*- "50.7∞1&/ @HFH D @HGF
    ORGANISASJONEN NEI TIL ATOMVÅPEN 1979 — 1987 ——————–—————– Hovedoppgave i historie Irene Valvik Vågen Universitetet i Bergen Mai 2002 ________________________________________________________________________ Innholdsfortegnelse ________________________________________________________________________ Forord Forkortelser Kapittel 1 – Innledning .................................................................................1 Problemstilling.........................................................................................................3 Tidligere forskning..................................................................................................4 Primærkilder ............................................................................................................7 Kapittel 2 – Bakgrunn...................................................................................9 Den første bølgen med atomvåpenprotester ............................................................9 Ideologiske forløpere.............................................................................................15 Forholdet mellom USA og Sovjetunionen ............................................................17 Oppsummering ......................................................................................................23 Kapittel 3 – Organisasjonen og dens utvikling......................................... 25 Nei til nye Atomvåpen...........................................................................................25 Fra ad hoc aksjon til
    [Show full text]
  • Endorsers and Co-Sponsors of the Signature Campaign for the Swift
    Endorsers and Co-sponsors of the Signature Campaign for the Swift Abolition of Nuclear Weapons From 19 countries: 44national organizations and 6 individuals and 9 international/ regional organizations, plus 2 representatives of national governments/inter-governmental organizations (please note that plural endorsers from one organization are not counted as individual endorsers). (As of January23, 2006) International & Regional Organizations Cora Weiss, President Yes, I will support this campaign. ◆Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)/ Susi Snyder, Secretary General ◆Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear I do hope that you are well, and looking forward to the Power in Space/ Bruce K. Gagnon, Coordinator new year. The Women's International League for Yes please do use our name. Good luck. Peace and Freedom (WILPF) after careful consideration, wholeheartedly endorses this ◆Women’s International Democratic Federation/ campaign. Please let me know where I should direct Marcia Campos, Chairperson our members to send signed appeals, and what else we can do to support these efforts. ◆International Secretariat Committee of Nuclear Free Zone Local Authorities/ Stewart Kemp, ◆WILPF/ Edith Ballantyne, UN Special advisor Secretary Please add my name to the appeal. Of course, I fully It is not possible for me to draw this to the attention of support it. colleagues at such short notice but Nuclear Free Local Authority policy supports the abolition of nuclear ◆Abolition Now Campaign of the Abolition 2000 weapons. Therefore I can convey the support of our Global Network to Eliminate Nuclear Weapons/ organisation for your initiative. Janet Bloomfield, Convenor Thank you for this initiative. The Abolition Now ◆Latin America and the Caribbean Nonviolence campaign supports your efforts and will link to your International/ petition on our website as we did with the previous Andrés Thomas Conteris, Program Director petition.
    [Show full text]
  • Sosialistisk Ungdom Brudd Etter Brudd
    Demonstrasjon mot den britiske statsminister Margaret Thatcher under hennes besøk i Norge 11. september 1986. Tri Ne s. jaNseN Sosialistisk Ungdom Brudd etter brudd s osialistisk Ungdom (sU) er ungdomsorganisasjonen til sosialistisk Venstreparti. ifølge sin egen selvforståelse er sU en revolusjonær sosia- listisk og feministisk organisasjon som kjemper for et sosialistisk folke- styre i Norge. sU ble stiftet i februar 1975, etter at ungdomspartiene til sosialistisk Folkeparti (sF), arbeiderbevegelsens informasjonskomité mot norsk medlemskap i eF (aiK), Demokratiske sosialister (Ds) og Norges Kommunistiske Parti (NKP) siden 1973 hadde snust på mulig- heten for et felles ungdomsforbund samtidig som deres moderpartier hadde etablert sosialistisk Valgforbund. Da partiene sF, aiK-Ds og enkeltmedlemmer fra NKP senere i 1975 gikk sammen og dannet sosia- listisk Venstreparti (sV), besluttet sU seg for å være bare sVs ungdoms- organisasjon. Denne artikkelen trekker forhistorien enda lenger tilbake og prøver å vise at dagens sU har sin politiske og organisatoriske start i begynnelsen av 1960-årene. artikkelen er for øvrig et første forsøk på å skrive en samlet fremstilling av sUs historie. Kildesituasjonen har vært en utfor- dring da kildematerialet er fragmentert. Kun noe materiale fra ungdoms- organisasjonen har vært bevart gjennom moderpartienes arkiver, men spesielt for perioden fra 1980-årene og fremover har det ikke hittil vært bevart noe eget samlet arkiv.1 SF og Ungdomskomiteen i 1961 ble sosialistisk Folkeparti dannet hovedsakelig av en gruppe ekskludert fra arbeiderpartiet. i sFs vedtekter stod det at «Partiet består av bostedslag og ungdomslag» som ble sett på som partiets «grunn- organisasjoner».2 Partiet nedsatte videre en ungdomskomité som skulle 87 a rbeiDerhisTorie 2011 sørge for at alle sF-lag rundt om i landet oppnevnte en kontaktperson for ungdomsarbeidet.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear, and the Cold War of the 1980S
    Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear, and the Cold War of the 1980s ECKART CONZE Philipps-Universita¨t Marburg MARTIN KLIMKE New York University Abu Dhabi JEREMY VARON The New School .256579CC, 423:586 846 23:5861:6:C/2:02C,,D364CCC9623:5866 C67D622:2362C9CC, 423:586 846C6 9CC,5: 8 One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, ny 10006,usa Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107136281 © Cambridge University Press 2017 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2017 Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Inc A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conze, Eckart, editor. | Klimke, Martin, editor. | Varon, Jeremy, 1969– editor. Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear and the Cold War of the 1980s / Eckart Conze, Philipps-University Marburg; Martin Klimke, New York University, Abu Dhabi; Jeremy Varon, Eugene Lang College, The New School. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, [2017] | Series: Publications of the German Historical Institute | “This book originated in a global conference in 2010, “Accidental Armageddons: The Nuclear Crisis and the Culture of the Second Cold War, 1975–1989.” Hosted by the German Historical Institute (GHI), the gathering was co-sponsored by New York University, the National Security Archive, and the New School for Social Research/Eugene Lang College”–Acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • <[email protected]> Date
    Return-Path: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:50:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Alice Slater <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: Working Group Convenor for Weapons Usable Radioactive Materials To: [email protected] X-Sender: [email protected] Dear Friends, I recently posted an enrollment form for our "1000 NGOs Campaign by the PrepCom" which listed our Working Group convenors and left a blank space for the Fissile Materials Working Group. I was just reminded by Martin Kalinowski that he volunteered to be the Convenor for the Abolition 2000 Working Group on Fissile Materials which we will now call Weapons Usable Radioactive Materials in order to include tritium, which is not fissionable but IS fusionable and a weapons-usable radioactive material. If you want to participate with this group, contact Martin below: Martin Kalinowski, IANUS, c/o Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstr. 9, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany Tel.: +49-6151-163016 FAX: +49-6151-166039 Internet, private: [email protected] Internet, group: [email protected] http://www.th-darmstadt.de/ze/ianus/welcome.htm and .../inesap.htm 101.01.txt[5/1/2017 4:14:19 PM] Return-Path: <[email protected]> X-Authentication-Warning: igc2.igc.apc.org: majordomo set sender to [email protected] using -f Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT) From: NGO Committee on Disarmament <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Subject: land mine abolition To: [email protected] To abolitionists of nuclear weapons, You all would be well advised to take a look at the treaty just agreed at Oslo, boldly banning anti-personnel land mines.
    [Show full text]
  • International Meeting: Plenary Session II
    International Meeting: Plenary Session II Peaceful & Just World and Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution (August 3) Panel Presentation: continues with the occupying forces led by the US being continually delivered bloody nose by the Sukla Sen insurgent forces, even if at a great cost to local Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace populace, thereby causing a serious setback to the American neocon plan for unilateral and India unfettered global domination by foregrounding its awesome military might to compensate for the Dear Friends and Comrades, inadequacy of its otherwise huge economic It’s a matter of some satisfaction and pride to prowess and political/diplomatic clout. The be again this year amongst you and stand before emergence of Venezuela, under the presidentship you, the leading anti-nuke peace activists from all of the redoubtable Hugo Chavez, and leftwing over the globe, as the representative of the CNDP, radical forces coming to power in a number of India, carrying the message of solidarity, to Latin American countries have considerably reaffirm our commitment to further reinforce the strengthened the global forces fighting against the global struggle for a peaceful and just world free of big bully, the US, on the global plain. The setback nuclear weapons – anywhere and everywhere. I, on signified by the victory of Nicolas Sarkozy in the my personal behalf and on behalf of the just concluded French presidential election would organization I’m proud to represent, convey my hopefully be partly mitigated by the transfer of sincerest thanks to the Gensuikyo for making it baton from Blair to Brown in the neighbouring possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Ned Hele Bladet I PDF-Format
    Medlemsblad for IPPNW Norge Nr. 1 - 2010 - Årgang 28 Norske leger mot atomvåpen IPPNW Europeisk studentmøte i Oslo Intervju med Jan Helge Solbakk Lær om atomvåpen en tryggere verden uten atomvapeno Norsk avdeling av International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War IPPNW Leder Til ungdommen! John Gunnar Mæland sin bok om Atomvåpen – Det du ikke vi venter fremfor alt på den avgjørende Leder NLA vet, det du ikke vil vite (Pax 2009): tilsynskonferansen i New York i mai om [email protected] ”Men gjør vi intet, vil våpnene sakte men Ikke-spredningsavtalen, som nylig fylte sikkert spres, drevet fram av sine unike 40 år. ødeleggende kapasiteter. Slik sett lever I Nordahl Griegs kjente dikt fra 1936 (se våpnene. Og slik kommer de en dag til En annen grunn til håp er at unge siste side i dette medlemsbladet) finner å brukes.” mennesker engasjerer seg i disse vi denne strofen: kompliserte spørsmålene. Den Mot dette stiller noen idealister internasjonale legebevegelsen mot Stilt går granatenes med knapt andre ressurser enn sine atomvåpen har alltid fått energi fra glidende bånd åndskrefter. Den internasjonale aktive studenter. Heldigvis ser dette Stans deres drift mot død fredsbevegelsen har ikke klart å engasjementet ut til bare å bli sterkere. stans dem med ånd! opprettholde den massemobiliseringen Dagens unge mennesker har et globalt som tvang igjennom politisk tøvær og perspektiv på sine liv og tenker Vi som har engasjert oss i kampen atomnedrustning på 1980- og 1990-tallet. internasjonalt på en helt ny måte. mot atomvåpen, kjenner oss igjen. Det Samtidig øyner vi nå nytt håp, først og politisk-militære-industrielle komplekset fremst fordi verdens mektigste mann, I dagene 8.
    [Show full text]