DOCSLIB.ORG

Penetration Strategies for NG Road Transport Use & Proposal for C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Penetration Strategies for NG Road Transport Use & Proposal for C D3.1: Penetration Strategies for NG Road Transport Use & Proposal for C/LNG Refuelling Stations’ Network Plan As part of the Activity 3.1. Natural Gas in Road Transportation: Design Plan VERSION 1 / DRAFT Deliverable 3.1: Penetration Strategies for NG Road Transport Use and Proposal for CNG / LNG Refuelling Stations’ Network Plan As part of the Activity 3.1. Natural Gas in Road Transportation: Design Plan VERSION 1 / DRAFT Responsible Partner: DDL Document Code: Version: 1 Date of Submission: 30/11/2018 Deliverable 3.1 CYnergy is co-financed by the European Union's Connecting Europe Facility. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Document Details Grant Agreement Number: INEA/CEF/SYN/A2016/1336268 Action Number: 2016-EU-SA-0009 Project Title: CYnergy Activity: 3 Sub-activity: 3.1 Milestone: 12 Document History Version Date Authorized 1 30.11.18 Deliverable 3.1 Contributing Authors DDL Koliousis, Ioannis Efstathiadis, Stylianos Koliousis, Panagiotis Ouzounoglou, Maria Disclaimer The information contained in this document is confidential, privileged and only for the information of the intended recipient and may not be used, published or redistributed without the prior written consent of Decision Dynamics Ltd and/or the Authors. The opinions expressed are in good faith and while every care has been taken in preparing these documents, Decision Dynamics Ltd and/or the Authors make no representations and gives no warranties of whatever nature in respect of these documents, including but not limited to the accuracy or completeness of any information, facts and/or opinions contained therein. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. Forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon reasonable assumptions; nevertheless, there can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Decision Dynamics Ltd and/or the Authors undertake no responsibility in the way the reader of this report will use the results and the analyses. Decision Dynamics Ltd and/or the Authors, its subsidiaries, the directors, employees and agents cannot be held liable for the use of and reliance of the opinions, estimates, forecasts and findings in these documents. Deliverable 3.1 Deliverable 3.1 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... 1 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... 4 1 Deliverable Scoping ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction to the Action ....................................................................................... 6 1.2 Introduction to Activity 3 ......................................................................................... 7 1.3 Activity 3.1 .............................................................................................................. 8 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 9 3 State of the Art .............................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Legal & Regulatory Context .................................................................................... 10 3.2 Vehicle types ......................................................................................................... 12 4 The Transportation Sector in the EU ............................................................................... 15 4.1 Emission standards ................................................................................................ 15 4.2 Natural Gas Market Overview ................................................................................ 15 4.2.1 Existing NG vehicles and NG Stations ......................................................................... 16 4.2.2 Taxation ...................................................................................................................... 17 4.2.3 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 17 4.3 Renewable Energy Directive .................................................................................. 18 4.4 The Fuel Quality Directive ...................................................................................... 18 4.5 Regulations on fuel economy ................................................................................. 19 4.6 Euro Standards of emissions for vehicles ................................................................ 19 5 Cyprus ........................................................................................................................... 21 5.1 Country presentation ............................................................................................. 21 5.2 Transportation sector ............................................................................................ 22 5.3 Renewable energy in transport .............................................................................. 25 5.4 Road Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 25 5.5 Public Transport .................................................................................................... 28 1 Deliverable 3.1 5.6 Case study ............................................................................................................. 29 5.6.1 Integrated Mobility Master Plan for Nicosia .............................................................. 29 5.6.2 Polycentric Nicosia ..................................................................................................... 30 5.6.3 Transport Management Authority ............................................................................. 32 5.6.4 Streetscape Manual .................................................................................................... 32 6 Refueling Station Assignment for C/LNG Vehicles in Cyprus ............................................ 34 6.1 Review of available models for Refueling Station Assignment ................................. 34 6.1.1 Elements of refueling station location problems ....................................................... 34 6.1.2 Approaches for location model .................................................................................. 34 6.1.3 Refueling Demand Estimation .................................................................................... 35 6.2 Cyprus: Case of Study and General Assumptions..................................................... 36 6.2.1 Study Area and Population ......................................................................................... 36 6.2.2 Reference Transportation System of Cyprus .............................................................. 37 6.2.3 Traffic Composition .................................................................................................... 38 6.2.4 Average Annual Vehicle Mileage ................................................................................ 42 6.3 Model Selection .................................................................................................... 43 6.3.1 Basic Scenario ............................................................................................................. 43 6.3.2 Future Demand Scenario ............................................................................................ 45 6.4 Refueling Stations Assignment ............................................................................... 47 2 Deliverable 3.1 List of Figures Figure 1 - Activity 3 Layout................................................................................................ 7 Figure 2 - Total length of the road network in Cyprus in 2015 by road type (Source: Statista) ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 5 – Map of Cyprus ............................................................................................... 37 Figure 6 – Main Airport Locations in Cyprus ................................................................... 49 Figure 7 - The motorway network of Cyprus (source: Department of Public Works) ........ 50 3 Deliverable 3.1 List of Tables Table 1 - The Clean Mobility & Power Package for Transport ......................................... 11 Table 2 - Available NGV models (Source: NGVA Europe, ISUZU Australia) ................... 13 Table 3 - European countries with highest number of NGVs (Source: NGVA 2013a) ...... 15 Table 4 - Sales of non-diesel or petrol passenger cars in selected countries - % of total (Source: ICCT, 2013) ...................................................................................................... 16 Table 5 – Existing NG vehicles and NG Stations (Adapted from NGVA Europe - Statistics
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sec(2005)1396
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 7.11.2005 SEC(2005) 1396 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Annex to the: ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COHESION FUND (2004) {COM(2005) 544 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. General Context......................................................................................................... 16 1.1. Convergence and economic development in the beneficiary countries of the Cohesion Fund ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.1 Greece ........................................................................................................................ 16 1.1.2. Spain........................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.3. Portugal ...................................................................................................................... 17 1.1.4. Cyprus ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.1.5. Czech Republic.......................................................................................................... 18 1.1.6. Estonia........................................................................................................................ 19 1.1.7. Hungary...................................................................................................................... 20 1.1.8. Latvia.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • T12 Traffic Management.Pdf
    Page 2 / 99 Submitted by: Task 12 group leader, Paul van der Kroon Prepared by: Group leader: Paul van der Kroon (The Netherlands) Group members: Austria Markus Bartsch , Sigrid Pirkelbauer , Michael Schneider Cyprus Alexis Avgoustis Denmark Finn Krenk Finland Petteri Portaankorva France Christophe Desnouailles Germany Georg Stern Italy Sandro La Monica, Pier Paolo Cartolano The Netherlands Bert Helleman Henk Jan de Haan Maarten Amelink (supporting consultant) Sweden Maria Nichan i Henrik Sundquist Bjorn Carselid Switzerland Gerhard Petersen / Markus Bartsch United Kingdom David Stones Nicholas Taylor (supporting consultant) Felicity Keen Overview meetings: 3–4 June 2009 Utrecht, the Netherlands 24 –25 September 2009 Stockho lm, Sweden 19 –21 January 2010 Paris, France (joint meeting with task group 11) 19 –20 May 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 6–7 October 2010 Vienna, Austria 10 –11 February 2011 Rome, Italy 22 –23 June 2011 Helsinki, Finland 3–4 November 2011 Bern, Switzerland 22 –23 February 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 29 June 2012 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 27 September 2012 This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not consider these views to be statements of the official position of CEDR's member states. ISBN : 979-10-93321-00-4 Traffic management to reduce congestion Page 3 / 99 This report is: FOR DECISION 1. Executive summary Purpose of the paper Congestion on the European road network has increased significantly over the past decade. This is the result of an increase in car ownership and car use in most European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • NTS A1 Motorway
    REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE UPGRADE TO SIX LANES OF THE SECTION OF THE NICOSIA-LIMASSOL MOTORWAY BETWEEN AGIA VARVARA AND NICOSIA, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERSECTION AT THE GSP STADIUM FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY: A. F. MODINOS & S. A. VRAHIMIS Environmental MANAGEMENT CHARTERED ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CONSULTANTS LTD Stadiou 75, Strovolos, PO box 25479 1310 Nicosia Agias Elenis 8 – 1060 Nicosia, Mezzanine, Office 01 PO Box 21559-1510 Nicosia, tel. 22767312, fax: 22767315 Tel. 22876050 Fax: 22514679 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SUMMARY 2.1 The man-made environment 2.2 Impact on the natural environment 2.3 Quantification of impacts 2.4 Conclusions 1. INTRODUCTION This study has been prepared following an expression of interest by the Ministry of Communications and Works (Public Works Department) of Cyprus, concerning the provision of services by specialist firms of consultants in connection with the preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment of the upgrade, to six lanes, of the section of the Nicosia-Limassol motorway between Agia Varvara and Nicosia, and the construction of an intersection at the GSP Stadium (Contract no. PS/D/239). This assessment presents the views expressed by the Cypriot consultancy firm A. F. MODINOS & S. A. VRAHIMIS, CHARTERED ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, in collaboration with he consultancy firm Environmental Management Consultants Ltd of Nicosia. The Nicosia - Agia Varvara section of the A1 motorway, as the connecting link between Nicosia and other towns, bears the heaviest traffic load,. The assessment concerns the upgrade to six lanes of the section of the existing motorway between the road junction of the Strovolos industrial zone and Agia Varvara, 12.4 km in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Liquefaction Plant Location of the Energy Centre
    30-31-VASILIKO_EUROKERDOS 6/4/15 2:29 PM Page 31 CYPRUS ENERGY: THE NEW ERA A formal Request for Proposals followed between 11/05/2012 and 06/07/2012, and two (2) proposals were finally submitted. These were evaluated by the appointed Evaluation Committee and on 12/12/2012, the Council of Ministers, following recom- mendations from the competent Ministe- rial Committee, issued a Decision to com- mence negotiations with the prevailing economic operator, with the purpose of finalizing the agreements to be signed bet- ween the joint venture members for the materialization of the project. The Vasilikos Oil Terminal includes: • facilities for the storage of operational oil reserves, • facilities for the storage of strategic oil reserves, and • facilities to allow it to operate as an oil have an initially export capacity of 5 million from the city of Larnaca and 25 kilometres trading hub. tonnes of LNG per annum (one liquefac- away from the city of Limassol. tion train), expandable to 15 million tonnes The location was judged, based on the Natural Gas Liquefaction Plant of LNG per annum (three liquefaction location and morphology of the area, as trains). the most suitable choice for the installation In June 2012, the Government of the of the facilities for the storage and distribu- Republic of Cyprus decided the commen- Location of the Energy Centre tion of petroleum products and for the cement of the necessary actions for the establishment of the Liquefaction Plant. establishment of the Natural Gas Liquefac- The Vasilikos area is located southerly of Another reason which counted towards tion Plant at Vasilikos.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlet Centres in Europe
    MARKET SURVEY March 2021 Outlet Centres in Europe Market Survey covering all operating and planned Outlet Centres in the European Countries Study within the Scope of ecostra’s Basic Research understanding markets | evaluating risks | discovering chances Preliminary remarks Beginning in the USA and, over the past 25 years, subsequently spreading in Europe as well, a new retail format has been established: the Factory Outlet Centre (FOC) or Designer Outlet Centre (DOC). In the meantime, such a high density of Outlet Centres already exists in some European countries (e.g. Great Britain), that one can certainly speak of market saturation here. Thus, in Great Britain, as in the USA also, a market shakeout is observable among locations of Outlet Centres, whereby the most professional operators, and accordingly suitable locations, win out over less productive concepts or locations with weaknesses. The situation in continental Europe is somehow different. Due what are, to date, extremely restrictive building permission procedures compared to those in the rest of Europe, Germany has only a very few Outlet Centres in relation to the size of this national market. However, there is little doubt that this will change in the medium-term perspective, at least. The kind of emotional argument that often used to take place until just a few years ago has now given way to a much more factual discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of establishing an Outlet Centre. Whereas Germany still shows a lot of potential for new Outlet Centres, Italy has seen a rapid development in the last years, and it’s difficult to discover any “white spots” on the map there.
    [Show full text]
  • CYPRUS OPEN STUDIOS Brochure Page 1 FRONT COVER 210716
    CATALOGUE / ΚΑTAΛΟΓΟΣ Visit studios and work spaces all over Cyprus FRONT COVER TO BE CONFIRMED Επισκεφτείτε στούντιο και χώρους δημιουργίας σε όλη την Κύπρο 2016 www.cyprusopenstudios.com WELCOME to CYPRUS OPEN STUDIOS 2016 ΚΑΛΩΣΟΡΙΣΑΤΕ στα CYPRUS OPEN STUDIOS 2016 This annual event aords the visitor the opportunity to interact with individual artists and artisans, who live and work in Cyprus, in their own studios. Visitors are encouraged to access our website featuring detailed information as well as a MAP to assist in locating each studio or workspace. Η ετήσια αυτή διοργάνωση προσφέρει στον επισκέπτη την δυνατότητα να γνωρίσει μεμονωμενους καλλιτέχνες και τεχνίτες, οι οποίοι ζουν και εργάζονται στην Κύπρο στα δικά τους στούντιο, στο δικό τους χώρο δημιουργίας. Οι επισκέπτες παρακαλούνται να επισκεφθούν την ιστοσελίδα μας, που διαθέτει λεπτομερείς πληροφορίες, καθώς και ένα χάρτη που θα βοηθήσει στον εντοπισμό του κάθε στούντιο. www.cyprusopenstudios.com Studios are open during the first 4 weekends of October between 11.00hrs and 17.00hrs on Saturdays and Sundays. Individual participants elected certain weekends to be open to the public – please look at the schedule to avoid disappointment. Entrance is free and visitors are under no obligation to buy, but we live in hope! And don’t forget to enter the competition: see the inside back cover for the entry form. Many of the participants undertake commissions – please consult with them direct. Banners bearing the distinctive orange splash will be displayed near the entrance to each open studio. Should you require specific information, please contact the studio or artist direct – you will be assisted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duties of the Swiss Federal Roads Office (FEDRO) 2 Motorways and Construction Sites Further Development of the Motorway Netw
    Contents Page The duties of the Swiss Federal Roads Office (FEDRO) 2 Motorways and construction sites Further development of the motorway network 3 Elimination of bottlenecks on the motorway network 4 Classification of motorways 5 The Swiss motorway network 6 Motorway sections scheduled to be opened to traffic between 2009 and 2013 7 Motorway tunnels 8 Gotthard tunnel fire brigade and rescue service 9 Total length by road category 10 2.154 billion Swiss francs for construction, expansion and maintenance 11 Major road works on the motorway network 12 Major maintenance sites on the motorway network in 2009 13 –15 Snow and ice clearance 16 European trunk roads passing through Switzerland 17 Finance Income and expenditure in the roads sector 18 –19 Financing 20 HGV inspection Ripshausen HGV inspection centre 21 Traffic flow and traffic management Traffic flow on Switzerland‘s motorways in 2008 22 Traffic volume on Swiss motorways in 2008 23 Transalpine goods traffic in 2008 24 Trend in traffic jams on the motorway network 25 Development of infrastructure for future traffic management 26 –27 Agglomeration programmes 28 Road traffic and vehicles New legal provisions governing road traffic 29 Making Switzerland‘s roads safer 30 Strict measures to improve the level of road safety 31 Slightly higher number of withdrawn licences in 2008 32 Registration of new road vehicles and technical details for new cars 33 Inventory of vehicles in Switzerland 34 Number of cars per capita in Europe / Switzerland 35 Names and addresses Road traffic departments 36 Cantonal police
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020 2
    …thanks. And you? Annual Report 2020 2 KEY FIGURES KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES 2016 2017 2018 2019 ∆ % 2020 Output volume (€ mln.) 13,491.03 14,620.89 16,322.88 16,617.97 -7 15,446.61 Revenue (€ mln.) 12,400.46 13,508.72 15,221.83 15,668.57 -6 14,749.74 Order backlog (€ mln.) 14,815.79 16,591.87 16,899.71 17,411.48 5 18,369.02 Employees (FTE) 71,839 72,904 75,460 76,919 -3 74,340 KEY EARNINGS FIGURES 2016 2017 2018 2019 ∆ % 2020 EBITDA (€ mln.) 855.18 834.58 952.60 1,113.30 5 1,174.45 EBITDA margin (% of revenue) 6.9 6.2 6.3 7.1 8.0 EBIT (€ mln.) 424.91 448.36 558.21 602.58 5 630.65 EBIT adjusted (€ mln.)1 397.10 502.90 EBIT margin (% of revenue) 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.8 4.3 EBIT margin adjusted (% of revenue)1 3.2 3.3 EBT (€ mln.) 421.13 421.21 530.78 577.24 6 610.05 Net income (€ mln.) 282.00 292.36 362.78 378.56 5 399.06 Net income after minorities (€ mln.) 277.65 278.91 353.53 371.70 6 395.22 Net income after minorities margin (% of revenue) 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.7 Earnings per share (€) 2.71 2.72 3.45 3.62 6 3.85 Cash flow from operating activities (€ mln.)2 264.17 1,345.19 788.98 1,075.94 19 1,279.66 ROCE (%) 6.4 6.7 7.6 7.5 7.5 Investments in property, plant and equipment, and in intangible assets (€ mln.) 412.46 457.62 644.99 689.25 -21 544.13 KEY BALANCE SHEET FIGURES 2016 2017 2018 2019 ∆ % 2020 Equity (€ mln.) 3,264.59 3,397.72 3,653.77 3,855.90 7 4,108.22 Equity ratio (%)2 31.5 30.7 31.6 31.5 33.9 Net debt (€ mln.) -449.06 -1,335.04 -1,218.28 -1,143.53 53 -1,747.23 Gearing ratio (%) -13.8 -39.3 -33.3 -29.7 -42.5 Capital employed (€ mln.) 5,258.17
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) May 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orient East Med Study Annexes
    Orient/East-Med Core Network Corridor Study Final Report Annexes December 2014 mmmll Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Corridor, Final Report, Appendix Content Annex 1: Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters Annex 1a: Rail Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013 Annex 1b: IWW Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013 Annex 1c: Road Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013 Annex 2: Lists of Reviewed Documents Annex 2a: List of Multinational Projects and Studies Annex 2b: Documents related to CEF Projects Annex 2c: List of National Projects and Studies Annex 3: Maps of the Corridor Annex 4: Review of Port Demand studies Annex 5: List of Projects per Transport Mode Annex 6: ERTMS Deployment Plan Annex 7: Review of most important corridor related studies Annex 8: List of Stakeholders Annex 9: Bottleneck Mitigation Analysis Disclaimer The information and views set out in this Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. December 2014 2 Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Core Network Corridor Final Report Annex 1 – Fulfilment of TEN-T Technical Parameters 5 December 2014 Study on Orient / East-Med TEN-T Corridor, Final Report, Annex 2 Tables Table A Rail Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013, issued 5 Dec 2014 Table B IWW Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013, issued 5 Dec 2014 Table C Road Infrastructure Compliance Test 2013, issued 5 Dec 2014 Disclaimer The information and views set out in this Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission.
    [Show full text]