DOCSLIB.ORG

Your Guide to the Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Your Guide to the Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Environmental Impact Statement Your guide to the Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Environmental Impact Statement Contents The Environmental Impact Statement 1 Why we need a new terminal 1 Why Moorebank 3 Moorebank Intermodal Company’s role 4 Relationship to SIMTA 4 Terminal concept plan 5 The impacts and mitigation 6 Have your say on the EIS 20 In seeking these approvals, the EIS assesses the The Environmental impacts that the terminal is likely to have on the local area and wider environment. This involved a Impact Statement thorough review of all potential environmental and The Australian Government is proposing an social impacts of the proposed concept design. intermodal terminal at Moorebank to better manage The review was based on the conditions of highest growth in freight while reducing the growth in trucks impact to ensure effects can be managed under all on our roads. As part of the planning for the terminal, scenarios. The EIS considers all the following issues: an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has • Traffic, transport and access; been prepared. • Noise and vibration; • Biodiversity; What is an EIS? • Hazards and risks; An EIS is a formal process used to understand the • Contamination and soils; positive and negative consequences of a proposed development. It is used by approval bodies to enable • Hydrology, groundwater and water quality; them to decide if the development should proceed or • Local and regional air quality; not. If the development is approved, the EIS is used • Greenhouse gas assessment; by approval bodies to decide what measures are • Aboriginal and European heritage; needed to ensure the development does not impact • Visual and urban design; the surrounding area unacceptably. • Property and infrastructure; What does the EIS do? • Social and economic impacts; The EIS for the Moorebank Intermodal Terminal • Human health risks and impacts; is seeking: • Waste and resources management. • NSW Government approval of the terminal concept – a project approval for the terminal’s detailed design is also needed before Why we need a construction begins; new terminal • NSW Government approval to start some early works, like decontaminating the land and • It will enable more freight to move to and from establishing a conservation zone; and Port Botany by rail instead of road, which will allow • Commonwealth Government approval to develop our imports and exports to continue to grow; the terminal. • it will allow more freight to move between NSW and other states by rail, which will reduce costs and growth of trucks on our highways; • it will allow more freight to get closer to its destination in west and south-west Sydney without using the road network, which will slow the growth in traffic congestion; and • rail freight has lower social and environmental costs (e.g. costs of road accidents and greenhouse emissions). Environmental Impact Statement exhibition – information booklet | 1 If these issues are not addressed they will add costs to the freight supply chain and, in turn, to the cost of goods. There would also be an increase in the economic, WARWICK FARM environmental and social impacts of road congestion in Sydney. The terminal is one of a number LIVERPOOL of intermodal terminals needed to manage the increased number of containers expected to come LIVERPOOL through Sydney in the long term. MOOREBANK The terminal will have economic, SOUTH WESTERN MOTORWAY (M5) social and environmental benefits, including: M7 MOTORWAY CASULA • Close to $9 billion in economic benefits over 30 years. CASULA This includes $120 million HUME HIGHWAY a year for south-west Sydney through improved WATTLE GROVE HOLSWORTHY productivity, reduced costs GLENFIELD EAST HILLS RAILWAY LINE of road damage, congestion and accidents, and better GLENFIELD environmental outcomes. GEORGESRIVER MAIN SOUTH RAILWAY LINE MAIN SOUTH RAILWAY LINE MACQUARIE FIELDS HOLSWORTHY 0 500 1000 RAILWAY LINE HIGHWAY Metres POTENTIAL RAILWAY LINE MOTORWAY TRAIN STATION RIVER SUBURB Terminal location: This map shows the terminal location near the M5 and M7 Motorways, and the Southern Sydney freight rail line. 2 | Environmental Impact Statement exhibition – information booklet • Up to 3,000 fewer truck journeys to and from What the intermodal terminal will do Port Botany each day. • Creation of as many as 1,500 jobs during Interstate Intermodal facilities container loading & unloading Warehouse & construction and around 2,200 long-term Port Botany packing/unpacking facilities jobs when the terminal is fully operational in about 2030. • Enabling the movement of growing freight Frieght rail volumes around Australia. FAQ – What is an intermodal terminal and what does it do? Container storage Heavy transport vehicles Transport vehicles An intermodal terminal is an ‘inland port’, where To/from road network & local shipping containers, which arrive by rail, are markets (shops and employers) unloaded and their contents distributed via truck to their final destination. Where container freight is headed in 2013 Why Moorebank The site at Moorebank is an ideal location for an intermodal terminal to handle both interstate and import-export freight. This is because it is: • long enough for interstate freight trains, which can be 1.5 km to 1.8 km long; • big enough to handle the number of containers expected – 1.05 million containers a year of import-export freight and another 500,000 containers of interstate freight; • next to the dedicated freight rail line that provides a direct link to the interstate freight network and Port Botany; • next to the M5 Motorway, and near the M7 Motorway and Hume Highway; • next to existing industrial areas, and close to major freight markets in west and south-west Sydney; • sufficiently far from Port Botany to make rail a viable alternative to trucks; • owned by the Australian Government. No other available site in south-western Sydney has these attributes. Environmental Impact Statement exhibition – information booklet | 3 import-export intermodal terminal only (i.e., unlike Moorebank Intermodal the MIC terminal, it does not include an interstate Company’s role intermodal terminal). An EIS for the concept of SIMTA’s proposed Moorebank Intermodal Company (MIC) is facilitating terminal has been approved by the Commonwealth the development of the Moorebank Intermodal Minister for the Environment. The terminal concept Terminal. MIC is an Australian Government business. has also been approved, with modifications, by A key part of MIC’s role is to select a private sector the NSW Planning Assessment Commission. operator for the terminal. The modifications include an annual 250,000 MIC must also ensure that the Government’s container limit on stage one of the development. policy objectives for the terminal are achieved. Subsequent development applications may be The objectives include that the terminal must submitted to increase the limit to 500,000 containers satisfy interstate, regional and import-export freight per year, if it can be shown that the transport needs; and be an open access facility that fosters network can support the additional throughput. competition among users of the terminal. Precinct opportunities MIC also has objectives to: MIC is currently negotiating with SIMTA to determine • attract employment and investment to west and whether it might be appointed to operate the south-western Sydney; Moorebank Intermodal Terminal. The negotiation is • achieve sound environmental and social exploring opportunities to enhance the Moorebank outcomes that are considerate of community freight precinct by combining the land for the MIC views; and terminal with the land owned by SIMTA. Combining • optimise value for money for the Commonwealth. the sites could provide more space for onsite warehousing, and help optimise the layout. FAQ – Why can’t the terminal be built at Eastern Creek or Badgerys Creek? If MIC and SIMTA can agree suitable terms for the development and operation of the terminal, there The growth in demand for overseas goods means will be a single terminal. It would handle the same a number of intermodals will be required in Sydney. volume of containers as proposed for the Moorebank Eastern Creek and Badgerys Creek may be suitable Intermodal Terminal; that is, 1.05 million containers sites in the future, but they need connections to of import-export freight and 500,000 containers of freight railway lines. Badgerys Creek may be too interstate freight each year at full capacity. far from freight markets for a commercially viable intermodal operation. The railway line from Port Botany places a practical constraint on the volume of import-export freight that can be handled at Moorebank. This constraint is Relationship to SIMTA created by the capacity of the railway infrastructure and expected demand from other users of the Separate from MIC’s proposal for the Moorebank railway line. It means the Moorebank area can Intermodal Terminal, SIMTA (the Sydney Intermodal only receive 1.05 million containers a year, so any Terminal Alliance, which comprises the logistics intermodal terminal at Moorebank, including a business Qube Holdings and the rail operator combined MIC-SIMTA terminal, would be limited to Aurizon) has proposed to build an intermodal terminal this number of import-export containers. on land opposite MIC’s site, on the eastern side of Moorebank Avenue. SIMTA’s proposal includes an 4 | Environmental Impact Statement exhibition – information booklet Terminal Proposed site for the Site for the relocation of Moorebank Intermodal the existing Defence concept
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2
    Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 Koala Management Plan SIMTA 12 March 2020 Final Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 Final | SIMTA Cumberland Ecology(02) 9868 © 1933 | PO Box 2474 Carlingford Court NSW 2118 | cumberlandecology.com.au Page i Report No. 18194RP1 The preparation of this report has been in accordance with the brief provided by the Client and has relied upon the data and results collected at or under the times and conditions specified in the report. All findings, conclusions or commendations contained within the report are based only on the aforementioned circumstances. The report has been prepared for use by the Client and no responsibility for its use by other parties is accepted by Cumberland Ecology. Version Date Issued Amended by Details 1 15/10/2019 JL/GK Draft for DPIE review 2 5/12/2019 GK Updates for EES and ER comments 3 12/03/2020 GK Final Approved by: David Robertson Position: Director Signed: Date: 12 March, 2020 Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 Final | SIMTA Cumberland Ecology © Page ii Table of Contents Glossary vi 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. The Project 2 1.3. Koala Survey History 3 1.4. Project Team 4 1.5. Document Structure 6 1.6. Purpose and Aims 6 2. Statutory Considerations 7 2.1. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 7 2.2. Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 8 2.3. NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 and Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 8 2.4. NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects and the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme 9 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Section 2 Issues
    Section 2 Issues This section summarises the current issues facing the South West Local Area and provides directions to inform the LAP. 2 38 South West Local Area - Issues Paper Section 2 Liveable The Community Plan vision for 'Liveable' is: . A city that is well planned, attractive and sustainable; a city that provides affordable, attractive and sustainable housing; a city with high quality community assets; a city that protects and promotes its history and identity. 2.1.1 Current Urban form Urban form refers to the way the local area looks and feels. It includes dwelling types and their age, building height, the concentration of dwellings in a given area (or ‘density’), and the public domain areas including footpaths, roads, parks and plazas. Urban form also refers to how these elements integrate with natural features of the local area such as topography, bushlands and the areas around the Georges River and its tributaries. The existing urban form in the three local area centres – Panania, Panania Top of the Hill and East Hills – and the neighbourhood areas is discussed below. The role of the centres in Bankstown City has been previously identified in Council’s Residential Development Strategy as follows: Panania - Small Village Centre – this centre captures land within 400m of Panania Station. Panania Top of the Hill – Neighbourhood Centre - this centre captures land within 150m of the middle of the mainstreet. East Hills - Neighbourhood Centre – this centres capture land within 150m of the East Hills Railway Station. Panania Small Village Centre The Panania centre has main street activity on both sides of the Panania railway station which vary in character and size as follows: South West Local Area - Issues Paper 39 Figure 9: Centres Context Map – Panania and Panania Top of the Hill Source: BCC, 2013 40 South West Local Area - Issues Paper Section 2 Panania Centre South (From Panania Railway Station to Tower Street).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Offset Strategy Appendix C Appendix Strategy Offset Biodiversity
    Appendix C Strategy Appendix C – Biodiversity Offset Biodiversity Offset Strategy Moorebank Intermodal Terminal – Biodiversity Offset Strategy April 2015 Moorebank Intermodal Company Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited ABN 80 078 004 798 Level 27, Ernst & Young Centre 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5394 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia Telephone +61 2 9272 5100 Facsimile +61 2 9272 5101 Email [email protected] Certified to ISO 9001, ISO 14001, AS/NZS 4801 2103829A-PR_6144 Rev_K A+ GRI Rating: Sustainability Report 2010 Moorebank Intermodal Terminal – Biodiversity Offsets Strategy Contents Page number 1. Introduction 1 2. Avoidance of impacts on biodiversity values 3 2.1 Avoidance and minimisation of direct impacts on biodiversity 3 2.1.1 Site selection 4 2.1.2 Planning 6 2.1.3 Construction 8 2.1.4 Operation 8 2.1.5 Mitigation and avoidance measures 9 2.2 Avoidance and minimisation of indirect impacts on biodiversity 10 3. Residual biodiversity impacts to be offset 11 3.1 Residual Impacts under the FBA 13 3.1.1 Ecosystem credits 13 3.1.2 Species credits 13 3.1.3 Impacts for further consideration by the consent authority 14 4. Proposed offset package 17 4.1 Identification of off-site offset areas 17 4.1.1 Biodiversity and landscape characteristics 17 4.1.2 Preliminary desktop identification of possible sites 19 4.1.3 Assessment and ranking of potential sites 20 4.1.4 Site inspection and identification of preferred site/s 20 4.1.5 Assessment against offsetting principles 20 4.2 Proposed offset sites 21 4.2.1 Moorebank Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • MPW Stage 3 Location
    9 April 2020 Fei Chen Graduate Project Manager Tactical Group Dear Fei, Re: Non-Aboriginal Heritage Assessment: Moorebank Precinct West Stage 3 Artefact Heritage (Artefact) has been engaged by Tactical Group (Tactical), on behalf of the Sydney Intermodal Terminal Alliance (SIMTA), to prepare this non-Aboriginal heritage assessment to inform the Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 3 Environmental Impact Assessment. SIMTA has been issued Development Consent (SSD 5066) for MPW Stage 1 and (SSD 7709) for MPW Stage 2, under Part 4, Division 4.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), to construct and operate an intermodal terminal (IMT) and associated warehouses on the western side of Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank (the MPW site). It is understood that as part of MPW Stage 3, SIMTA propose to progressively subdivide the WPW site and establish a temporary works compound and associated road and underground utilities on the southern half of the MPW site. The purpose of this report is to provide a non-Aboriginal heritage assessment for the proposed works in accordance with the Planning Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) issued for MPW Stage 3 (SSD 10431) on 20 March 2020. The report would inform the MPW Stage 3 EIS and confirm if the impacts will be consistent with the approved SSD 5066 and SSD 7709. A separate Aboriginal heritage assessment has also been prepared to inform MPW Stage 3. MPW Stage 3 Location The MPW site is generally bounded by the Georges River to the west, Moorebank Avenue to the east, the East Hills Railway Line to the south and the M5 Motorway to the north (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Directions
    Residential Development Study Part One Strategic Directions for the Future Residential Development of the City of Bankstown October 2009 Bankstown City Council Residential Development Study–Part One 1 October 2009 Bankstown City Council Part One–Contents Introduction 3 About the Residential Development Study 5 Background Study Area Study Objectives Study Outcomes Local Context: Strengths & Challenges 9 Land & Housing Stock Analysis Environmental Analysis Demographic Analysis Market Analysis Affordable Housing Analysis Economic Analysis Infrastructure & Transport Analysis Urban Design Analysis Strategic Directions 16 Action 1–Stage the supply of housing numbers Action 2–Distribute supply in centres and neighbourhood areas Action 3–Support the renewal of 13 centres Action 4–Prepare more detailed plans to support renewal of centres Action 5–Stage the supply of housing numbers in centres after 2022 Action 6–Consideration of planning proposals Summary of Hierarchy in the City of Bankstown 27 Bankstown CBD Yagoona Padstow Revesby Chester Hill Bass Hill Panania Greenacre Sefton Rookwood Road Precinct East Hills Birrong Punchbowl Conclusion 53 Residential Development Study–Part One 2 October 2009 Bankstown City Council Introduction Our Guide for Shaping the City of Bankstown to 2031 The City of Bankstown is a great place, shaped by cultural diversity, strong economy, rivers and parks; and has many competing demands. As part of the State Government’s plans to grow Sydney and accommodate more people, the City of Bankstown is expected to increase its housing numbers by 22,000 and generate 6,000 new jobs. The challenge for Council is to find a way to make these increases and still ensure that transport, infrastructure and services keep pace with the growing population, without negative impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Local Area Plan APRIL 2016
    South West Local Area Plan APRIL 2016 South West Local Area Plan Content A Vision for the Future 5 Chapter 1 GROWTH...CHANGE...FUTURE 1 1.1 Introduction 10 1.2 About the Local Area Plan 11 1.3 Centres Hierarcy 13 3 1.4 The Locality 16 Local Area Plan South West 1.5 Historical Context 22 1.6 Population and Demographic Change 23 1.7 Metropolitan Planning Context 24 1.8 Community Issues 26 Chapter 2 LOCAL AREA ACTIONS 2 2.1 Liveable 30 2.2 Invest 90 2.3 Green 95 2.4 Connected 107 Chapter 3 OVERVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION 3 3.1 Overview and Implementation 114 3.2 Statutory Planning Framework 117 3.3 Assets and Infrastructure 124 Centres and neighbourhoods The intended outcomes of the never stay the same. The South proposed amendments to the West Local Area of the 1960s South West Local Area Plan was very different to today. It will are to balance these different also be very different in 2031. expectations and to respond to future challenges. It is important The decision we must face is to note that the South West whether we want to manage Local Area Plan is more than a this change to create a liveable, housing plan, it includes various green place or whether we allow actions to make our suburbs change to occur in an ad hoc liveable, employment generating, 4 unplanned manner. South West Local Area Plan South West green and connected for the Council has amended the future. South West Local Area Plan in response to consultation with the community, industry, state agencies and key stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Redistribution of the New South Wales Into Electoral Divisions
    Proposed redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions OCTOBER 2015 Report of the Redistribution Committee for New South Wales Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 PO Box 6172 Kingston ACT 2604 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-38-1 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 © State of New South Wales 2015 The report should be cited as Redistribution Committee for the New South Wales, Proposed redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions. 15_0526 The Redistribution Committee for New South Wales (the Committee) has completed its proposed redistribution of New South Wales into 47 electoral divisions. In developing and considering the impacts of the redistribution proposal, the Committee has satisfied itself that the proposed boundaries meet the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act). The Committee unanimously agreed on the boundaries and names of the proposed electoral divisions, and recommends its redistribution proposal for New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Project
    Chapter 2 values Chapter 2 – Site context and environmental Site context and environmental values Contents Page number 2. Site context and environmental values 2-1 2.1 Regional setting 2-1 2.2 Local setting 2-3 2.3 Overview of the Project site 2-6 2.4 Key environmental values 2-11 2.4.1 Ecology 2-11 2.4.2 Geology and soils 2-12 2.4.3 Hydrology and water quality 2-12 2.4.4 Air quality and existing noise environment 2-13 2.4.5 European heritage values 2-13 2.4.6 Aboriginal heritage values 2-14 2.4.7 Visual values 2-14 List of figures Page number Figure 2.1 Regional setting 2-2 Figure 2.2 Existing land use in vicinity of Project 2-5 Figure 2.3 Existing land tenure (based on the northern rail access option) 2-8 Figure 2.4 Existing land tenure (based on the central rail access option) 2-9 Figure 2.5 Existing land tenure (based on the southern rail access option) 2-10 Parsons Brinckerhoff i 2. Site context and environmental values Chapter 2 provides a summary of the site for the Moorebank Intermodal Terminal (IMT) Project (the Project site), including a description of its regional setting and local context, environmental values and land tenure information. The IMT is proposed to be situated on land in the suburb of Moorebank, in south-west Sydney (refer to Figure 1.1 in Chapter 1 – Introduction). The IMT would occupy approximately 220 hectares (ha) of Commonwealth land to the south of the M5 Motorway and east of Moorebank Avenue (this is referred to as the ‘IMT site’ within this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)).
    [Show full text]
  • CANTERBURY BANKSTOWN Draft Housing Strategy
    CANTERBURY BANKSTOWN Draft Housing Strategy February 2020 Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................. 18 Canterbury Bankstown LGA .......................................................................................... 18 Scope of the local housing strategy .............................................................................. 19 Study objectives ............................................................................................................ 20 Local Housing Strategy Guideline.................................................................................. 20 Report structure ............................................................................................................ 21 2.0 Planning policy and context ....................................................................... 23 Greater Sydney Region Plan .......................................................................................... 23 South District Plan ......................................................................................................... 26 Future Transport Strategy 2056 (March 2018) ............................................................. 27 Local Strategic Planning Statement – Connective City 2036 ......................................... 28 Planned Precincts and Renewal Corridor Strategy ....................................................... 28 Sydenham to Bankstown Urban Renewal Corridor ........................................ 28 Canterbury
    [Show full text]
  • 2103829E-TPT-REP-003 Reva I Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface Water Assessment
    Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Project Environmental Impact Statement Volume 6 October 2014 Technical Paper 6 Assessment Paper 6 - Surface Water Technical Surface Water Assessment Contents of the EIS EIS Summary Chapter 1 – Introduction Chapter 2 – Site context and environmental values Chapter 3 – Strategic context and need for the Project Chapter 4 – Planning and statutory requirements TECHNICAL PAPERS Chapter 5 – Stakeholder and community consultation Chapter 6 – Project development and alternatives EIS Volume 3 Chapter 7 – Project built form and operations Chapter 8 – Project development phasing and construction 1 – Traffic and Transport Impact Assessment VOLUME 1a Chapter 9 – Project sustainability 2 – Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Chapter 10 – Impact assessment approach Chapter 11 – Traffic, transport and access EIS Volume 4 Chapter 12 – Noise and vibration 3 – Ecological Impact Assessment (with Chapter 13 – Biodiversity associated Biodiversity Offset Strategy) Chapter 14 – Hazards and risks 4 – Preliminary Risk Assessment Chapter 15 – Contamination and soils EIS Volume 5a 5 – Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 2) Chapter 16 – Hydrology, groundwater and water quality Chapter 17 – Local air quality Chapter 18 – Regional air quality EIS Volume 5b Chapter 19 – Greenhouse gas assessment 5 – Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 2) Chapter 20 – Aboriginal heritage Appendices C to F Chapter 21 – European heritage Chapter 22 – Visual and urban design EIS Volume 6 Chapter 23 – Property and infrastructure 6 – Surface Water Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Assessment.Pdf
    Riparian Assessment Transitional Part 3A Concept Plan Application 06 / 06 / 2013 Page left intentionally blank Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd ABN 76 104 485 289 Level 5, 141 Walker Street Locked Bag 6503 North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia Tel: +61 2 8907 9000 Fax: +61 2 8907 9001 www.hyderconsulting.com SIMTA SIMTA Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Facility Riparian Assessment Author Denise Day Checker Brad Searle Approver Richard Johnson This report has been prepared for SIMTA in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for SIMTA Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Facility dated October 2010. Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 f:\aa003760\r-reports\variation 14 - concept plan reports\final\moorebank riparian report_final_06062013.doc Page left intentionally blank CONTENTS 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 2 Riparian Zone Management Requirements ......................................... 4 2.1 Water Management Act 2000 ................................................................ 4 2.2 Liverpool Development Control Plan ..................................................... 5 2.3 Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No 2—Georges River Catchment .................................................................................... 6 2.4 Fisheries Management Act 1994 ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Narwee Station Upgrade Statement of Heritage Impact March 2016
    Transport for New South Wales 31-Mar-2016 Narwee Station Upgrade Statement of Heritage Impact Revision C – 31-Mar-2016 Prepared for – Transport for New South Wales – ABN: 18 804 239 602 AECOM Narwee Station Upgrade – Statement of Heritage Impacts Narwee Station Upgrade Statement of Heritage Impact Client: Transport for New South Wales ABN: 18 804 239 602 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 21, 420 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000, PO Box Q410, QVB Post Office NSW 1230, Australia T +61 2 8934 0000 F +61 2 8934 0001 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 31-Mar-2016 Job No.: 60488497 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001, ISO14001, AS/NZ S4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety.
    [Show full text]