DOCSLIB.ORG

2103829E-TPT-REP-003 Reva I Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface Water Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2103829E-TPT-REP-003 Reva I Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface Water Assessment Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Project Environmental Impact Statement Volume 6 October 2014 Technical Paper 6 Assessment Paper 6 - Surface Water Technical Surface Water Assessment Contents of the EIS EIS Summary Chapter 1 – Introduction Chapter 2 – Site context and environmental values Chapter 3 – Strategic context and need for the Project Chapter 4 – Planning and statutory requirements TECHNICAL PAPERS Chapter 5 – Stakeholder and community consultation Chapter 6 – Project development and alternatives EIS Volume 3 Chapter 7 – Project built form and operations Chapter 8 – Project development phasing and construction 1 – Traffic and Transport Impact Assessment VOLUME 1a Chapter 9 – Project sustainability 2 – Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Chapter 10 – Impact assessment approach Chapter 11 – Traffic, transport and access EIS Volume 4 Chapter 12 – Noise and vibration 3 – Ecological Impact Assessment (with Chapter 13 – Biodiversity associated Biodiversity Offset Strategy) Chapter 14 – Hazards and risks 4 – Preliminary Risk Assessment Chapter 15 – Contamination and soils EIS Volume 5a 5 – Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 2) Chapter 16 – Hydrology, groundwater and water quality Chapter 17 – Local air quality Chapter 18 – Regional air quality EIS Volume 5b Chapter 19 – Greenhouse gas assessment 5 – Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 2) Chapter 20 – Aboriginal heritage Appendices C to F Chapter 21 – European heritage Chapter 22 – Visual and urban design EIS Volume 6 Chapter 23 – Property and infrastructure 6 – Surface Water Assessment Chapter 24 – Social and economic impacts VOLUME 1b 7 – Local Air Quality Impact Assessment Chapter 25 – Human health risks and impacts 8 – Regional Air Quality Impact Assessment Chapter 26 – Waste and resource management 9 – Greenhouse Gas Assessment Chapter 27 – Cumulative impacts Chapter 28 – Environmental management framework Chapter 29 – Environmental risk analysis EIS Volume 7 Chapter 30 – Project justification and conclusions 10 – Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Chapter 31 – References EIS Volume 8 Appendix A – EIS Project team 11 – European Heritage Impact Assessment Appendix B – EIS guidelines and requirements 12 – Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C – Compliance with the Georges River REP principles Appendix D – Consultation information, materials and outcomes Appendix E – MCA criteria relating to Project objectives EIS Volume 9 Appendix F – Layouts of shortlisted Project alternatives 13 – Light Spill Impact Assessment Appendix G – Peer review endorsement letters 14 – Social Impact Assessment Appendix H – Provisional EMPs 15 – Human Health Risk Assessment VOLUME 2 Appendix I – Environmental record of Proponent 16 – Health Impact Assessment Appendix J – Compliance with Schedule 1, Part 1 and 2 of the (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Appendix K – Tenure history of the Project site Contents VOLUME 1A – MAIN VOLUME Declaration Glossary and abbreviations Executive summary Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Site context and environmental values Chapter 3 Strategic context and need for the Project Chapter 4 Planning and statutory requirements Chapter 5 Stakeholder and community consultation Chapter 6 Project development and alternatives Chapter 7 Project built form and operations Chapter 8 Project development phasing and construction Chapter 9 Project sustainability Chapter 10 Impact assessment approach Chapter 11 Traffic, transport and access Chapter 12 Noise and vibration Chapter 13 Biodiversity Chapter 14 Hazards and risks Chapter 15 Contamination and soils VOLUME 1B – MAIN VOLUME Chapter 16 Hydrology, groundwater and water quality Chapter 17 Local air quality Chapter 18 Regional air quality Chapter 19 Greenhouse gas assessment Chapter 20 Aboriginal heritage Chapter 21 European heritage Chapter 22 Visual and urban design Chapter 23 Property and infrastructure Chapter 24 Social and economic impacts Chapter 25 Human health risks and impacts Chapter 26 Waste and resource management Parsons Brinckerhoff i Chapter 27 Cumulative impacts Chapter 28 Environmental management framework Chapter 29 Environmental risk analysis Chapter 30 Project justification and conclusions Chapter 31 References VOLUME 2 – APPENDICES Appendix A EIS Project team Appendix B EIS guidelines and requirements Appendix C Compliance with the Georges River Regional Environment Plan (REP) principles Appendix D Consultation information, materials and outcomes Appendix E MCA criteria relating to Project objectives Appendix F Layouts of shortlisted Project alternatives Appendix G Peer review endorsements Appendix H Provisional EMPs Appendix I Environmental record of Proponent Appendix J Compliance with Schedule 1, Part 1 and 2 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) Appendix K Tenure history of the Project site VOLUME 3 Technical Paper 1 Traffic and Transport Impact Assessment Technical Paper 2 Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment VOLUME 4 Technical Paper 3 Ecological Impact Assessment (with associated Biodiversity Offset Strategy) Technical Paper 4 Preliminary Risk Assessment VOLUME 5A Technical Paper 5 Environment Site Assessment (Phase 2) Parsons Brinckerhoff ii VOLUME 5B Technical Paper 5 Environment Site Assessment (Phase 2) – Appendices C-F VOLUME 6 Technical Paper 6 Surface Water Assessment Technical Paper 7 Local Air Quality Impact Assessment Technical Paper 8 Regional Air Quality Impact Assessment Technical Paper 9 Greenhouse Gas Assessment VOLUME 7 Technical Paper 10 Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment VOLUME 8 Technical Paper 11 European Heritage Impact Assessment Technical Paper 12 Visual Impact Assessment VOLUME 9 Technical Paper 13 Light Spill Impact Assessment Technical Paper 14 Social Impact Assessment Technical Paper 15 Human Health Risk Assessment Technical Paper 16 Health Impact Assessment Parsons Brinckerhoff iii Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Surface water assessment 25 June 2014 Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface water assessment Contents Page number Abbreviations iii 1. Introduction 5 1.1 The Moorebank Intermodal Terminal Project 5 1.2 Rail access options and layouts 6 1.3 The project site 6 1.4 Project delivery 8 1.5 Planning and assessment process 10 1.6 Report outline 10 1.7 Assessment criteria 11 1.8 Assessment methodology 13 2. Existing environment 15 2.1 Regional surface water environment 15 2.2 Local surface water environment 19 3. Impact assessment 27 3.1 Proposed project works 27 3.2 Regional flooding impacts 30 3.3 Local stormwater catchment impacts 36 3.4 Surface water quality impacts 38 4. Mitigation measures 43 4.1 Early works 43 4.2 Regional flooding mitigation measures 43 4.3 On-site stormwater management 44 5. Conclusions 49 6. References 51 Parsons Brinckerhoff | 2103829E-TPT-REP-003 RevA i Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface water assessment List of tables Page number Table 1.1 Secretary for the NSW DP&E’s Environmental Assessment Requirements 11 Table 1.2 Commonwealth EIS requirements 11 Table 2.1 Project site flood risk zones 16 Table 2.2 Existing water quality data 26 Table 3.1 Northern rail access option 1% AEP flood levels and afflux results 32 Table 3.2 Central rail access option 1% AEP flood levels and afflux results 33 Table 3.3 Southern rail access 1% AEP flood levels and afflux 33 Table 3.4 1% AEP flood levels and afflux results with climate change allowance for the northern rail access option 35 Table 3.5 Northern rail connection stormwater runoff estimation 37 Table 3.6 Central rail connection option stormwater runoff estimation 37 Table 3.7 Southern rail connection stormwater runoff estimation 37 Table 3.8 MUSIC modelling of stormwater pollutants 40 Table 3.9 Northern rail connection option treatment area requirement estimation 40 Table 3.10 Central rail connection option treatment area requirement estimation 41 Table 3.11 Southern rail connection option treatment area requirement estimation 41 List of figures Page number Figure 1.1 Project site location 7 Figure 1.2 Project development phasing 9 Figure 2.1 Existing flood risk probability map 18 Figure 2.2 Existing water bodies and surface drainage 21 Figure 2.3 Existing water quality sampling sites 25 List of appendices Appendix A Design Flood Impact Assessment Appendix B Stormwater Management Plan Appendix C Figures Parsons Brinckerhoff | 2103829E-TPT-REP-003 RevA ii Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface water assessment Abbreviations AEP Annual Exceedance Probability ARI ARI – Average Recurrence Interval CERAT Coastal Eutrophication Risk Assessment Tool DA Development Assessment DGR Director General’s Requirements DNSDC Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre DoD Department of Defence EC Electrical Conductivity EIS Environmental Impact Statement ESA Environmental Site Assessment EV Environmental values GRCCC Georges River Combined Council Committee Ha Hectares LCC Liverpool City Council OEH NSW Office of Environment and Heritage OSD On-Site Detention m AHD Metres Australian Height Datum MIMT Moorebank Intermodal Terminal MIC Moorebank Intermodal Company NOW New South Wales Office of Water RCP Reinforced concrete pipe SEWPaC Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities SSD State significant development SSFL Southern Sydney Freight Line TN Total nitrogen WQOs Water Quality Objectives Parsons Brinckerhoff | 2103829E-TPT-REP-003 RevA iii Moorebank Intermodal Company Moorebank Intermodal Terminal - Surface water
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Club Veedub Sydney. December 2014
    NQ629.2220994/5 Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au Merry Christmas to all our members! December 2014 IN THIS BUMPER CHRISTMAS ISSUE: Eastern Creek Marshals Marques in the Park Boris’ Picnic Day Snowy Mountains 1000 Pie In the Sky Run Eat St Parramatta 1956 Chicago Run Plus lots more... Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au A member of the NSW Council of Motor Clubs. Also affiliated with CAMS. ZEITSCHRIFT - December 2014 - Page 1 Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au Club VeeDub Sydney Club VeeDub membership. Membership of Club VeeDub Sydney is open to all Committee 2014-15. Volkswagen owners. The cost is $45 for 12 months. President: Steve Carter 0490 020 338 [email protected] Monthly meetings. Monthly Club VeeDub meetings are held at the Vice President: Craig Adams 0404 184 893 Greyhound Social Club Ltd., 140 Rookwood Rd, Yagoona, on [email protected] the third Thursday of each month, from 7:30 pm. All our members, friends and visitors are most welcome. Secretary and: Norm Elias 0421 303 544 Membership: [email protected] Correspondence. Assist. Secretary: David Birchall (02) 9534 4825 Club VeeDub Sydney [email protected] PO Box 1340 Camden NSW 2570 Treasurer: Martin Fox 0411 331 121 [email protected] Our magazine. Editor: Phil Matthews 0412 786 335 Zeitschrift (German for ‘magazine’) is published monthly [email protected] by Club VeeDub Sydney Inc. Members with email details receive Assistant Editor: Lily Matthews Zeitschrift as a full-colour PDF from our website. We welcome all letters and contributions of general VW interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat
    REDUCING THE IMPACT OF WEIRS ON AQUATIC HABITAT NSW DETAILED WEIR REVIEW REPORT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST SYDNEY METROPOLITAN CMA REGION Published by NSW Department of Primary Industries. © State of New South Wales 2006. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in an unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal use or for non-commercial use within your organisation provided due credit is given to the author and publisher. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Manager Publishing, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2006). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of NSW Department of Primary Industries or the user‘s independent adviser. This report should be cited as: NSW Department of Primary Industries (2006). Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat - New South Wales Detailed Weir Review. Sydney Metropolitan CMA region. Report to the New South Wales Environmental Trust. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Flemington, NSW. ISBN: 0 7347 1753 9 (New South Wales Detailed Weir Review) ISBN: 978 0 7347 1833 4 (Sydney Metropolitan CMA region) Cover photos: Cob-o-corn Weir, Cob-o-corn Creek, Northern Rivers CMA (upper left); Stroud Weir, Karuah River, Hunter/Central Rivers CMA (upper right); Mollee Weir, Namoi River, Namoi CMA (lower left); and Hartwood Weir, Billabong Creek, Murray CMA (lower right).
    [Show full text]
  • Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2
    Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 Koala Management Plan SIMTA 12 March 2020 Final Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 Final | SIMTA Cumberland Ecology(02) 9868 © 1933 | PO Box 2474 Carlingford Court NSW 2118 | cumberlandecology.com.au Page i Report No. 18194RP1 The preparation of this report has been in accordance with the brief provided by the Client and has relied upon the data and results collected at or under the times and conditions specified in the report. All findings, conclusions or commendations contained within the report are based only on the aforementioned circumstances. The report has been prepared for use by the Client and no responsibility for its use by other parties is accepted by Cumberland Ecology. Version Date Issued Amended by Details 1 15/10/2019 JL/GK Draft for DPIE review 2 5/12/2019 GK Updates for EES and ER comments 3 12/03/2020 GK Final Approved by: David Robertson Position: Director Signed: Date: 12 March, 2020 Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 Final | SIMTA Cumberland Ecology © Page ii Table of Contents Glossary vi 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. The Project 2 1.3. Koala Survey History 3 1.4. Project Team 4 1.5. Document Structure 6 1.6. Purpose and Aims 6 2. Statutory Considerations 7 2.1. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 7 2.2. Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 8 2.3. NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 and Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 8 2.4. NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects and the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme 9 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Section 2 Issues
    Section 2 Issues This section summarises the current issues facing the South West Local Area and provides directions to inform the LAP. 2 38 South West Local Area - Issues Paper Section 2 Liveable The Community Plan vision for 'Liveable' is: . A city that is well planned, attractive and sustainable; a city that provides affordable, attractive and sustainable housing; a city with high quality community assets; a city that protects and promotes its history and identity. 2.1.1 Current Urban form Urban form refers to the way the local area looks and feels. It includes dwelling types and their age, building height, the concentration of dwellings in a given area (or ‘density’), and the public domain areas including footpaths, roads, parks and plazas. Urban form also refers to how these elements integrate with natural features of the local area such as topography, bushlands and the areas around the Georges River and its tributaries. The existing urban form in the three local area centres – Panania, Panania Top of the Hill and East Hills – and the neighbourhood areas is discussed below. The role of the centres in Bankstown City has been previously identified in Council’s Residential Development Strategy as follows: Panania - Small Village Centre – this centre captures land within 400m of Panania Station. Panania Top of the Hill – Neighbourhood Centre - this centre captures land within 150m of the middle of the mainstreet. East Hills - Neighbourhood Centre – this centres capture land within 150m of the East Hills Railway Station. Panania Small Village Centre The Panania centre has main street activity on both sides of the Panania railway station which vary in character and size as follows: South West Local Area - Issues Paper 39 Figure 9: Centres Context Map – Panania and Panania Top of the Hill Source: BCC, 2013 40 South West Local Area - Issues Paper Section 2 Panania Centre South (From Panania Railway Station to Tower Street).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Offset Strategy Appendix C Appendix Strategy Offset Biodiversity
    Appendix C Strategy Appendix C – Biodiversity Offset Biodiversity Offset Strategy Moorebank Intermodal Terminal – Biodiversity Offset Strategy April 2015 Moorebank Intermodal Company Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited ABN 80 078 004 798 Level 27, Ernst & Young Centre 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5394 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia Telephone +61 2 9272 5100 Facsimile +61 2 9272 5101 Email [email protected] Certified to ISO 9001, ISO 14001, AS/NZS 4801 2103829A-PR_6144 Rev_K A+ GRI Rating: Sustainability Report 2010 Moorebank Intermodal Terminal – Biodiversity Offsets Strategy Contents Page number 1. Introduction 1 2. Avoidance of impacts on biodiversity values 3 2.1 Avoidance and minimisation of direct impacts on biodiversity 3 2.1.1 Site selection 4 2.1.2 Planning 6 2.1.3 Construction 8 2.1.4 Operation 8 2.1.5 Mitigation and avoidance measures 9 2.2 Avoidance and minimisation of indirect impacts on biodiversity 10 3. Residual biodiversity impacts to be offset 11 3.1 Residual Impacts under the FBA 13 3.1.1 Ecosystem credits 13 3.1.2 Species credits 13 3.1.3 Impacts for further consideration by the consent authority 14 4. Proposed offset package 17 4.1 Identification of off-site offset areas 17 4.1.1 Biodiversity and landscape characteristics 17 4.1.2 Preliminary desktop identification of possible sites 19 4.1.3 Assessment and ranking of potential sites 20 4.1.4 Site inspection and identification of preferred site/s 20 4.1.5 Assessment against offsetting principles 20 4.2 Proposed offset sites 21 4.2.1 Moorebank Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Chipping Norton Lake Scheme
    I rn .FI-rZH E-N . "1 Department of Public Works NSW I I Chipping Norton Lake Scheme I Hydraulic Investigation Report No 270 April 1980 I I I )1 :1 I I I 'I I I I I 1 1 I I I I t I I I I CHIPPING NORTON FEBRUARY 1978 I ( Phot09raphy by Qosco Ply. Ltd. ) 'I I I Department of Public Works, N.S.W. I MANLY HYDRAULICS LABORATORY I I CHIPPING NORTON LAKE SCHEME I HYDRAULIC INVESTICATION I I I I I I I I I I I I A.T. Webb I P. Spurway Report No. 270 1980 I April I I I SUMMARY Dredging of the Georges River at Ch1pping Norton has been a I major source of clean bU1lding sand for some years. Further dredging and assoc1ated works will eventually convert the area 1nto a recreational lake. I A scaled hydraul1c model was used in conJunct10n with f1eld data collection and hand calculations to determine various aspects of the behaviour of the proposed lake scheme. The following problems assoc1ated I with creation of the scheme were considered : • continuously stagnant cond1tions in a tidal cycle in any area could I allow the accumulation of noxious debr1s. Inadequate m1xing of any pollutants enter1ng the lake. result1ng from insuff1cient c1rculation 1n the lake. could also be possible. I • strat1ficat10n of waters in the lake could lead to nOX10US conditions due to deoxygenat10n of the deep layers. I • the silt and sand load 1n the r1ver would tend to settle in the lake. with assoc1ated siltation problems in the upstream reaches a I possib111ty.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Action Group Celebrating 10 Years of Serving the Community
    Feature Liverpool Action Group Celebrating 10 Years of Serving the Community. Liverpool’s greatest natural asset is without doubt the Georges River. The Liverpool Action Group (LAG) Environment Group, volunteer their service and expertise to maintain the Liverpool section of the Georges River, where feral woody weeds, like Lantana, have inundated hectares of river-side woodland and scrub to the point where the bush can no longer regenerate naturally without immediate restoration Top: Bob Storey wades into thick lantana with a works. vengeance. Bottom: Bob Storey plans his attack while Gary A 40 page booklet entitled ‘’Plan to Restore Lucas offers a suggestion. Environmental Assets” was prepared by LAG’s Environment Officer, Bob Storey and presented Photos: Ian Bailey 28th September 2015. to three levels of Government with a request for funding over a five year period, 2014 to 2019. The Georges River is without doubt Liverpool’s The NSW Government agreed to a grant in 2015 greatest natural asset. The land adjacent to the which made it possible to purchase a few power Georges River was occupied for many thousands of tools and plant 2,000 to 3,000 trees and shrubs years by the Tharawal and Eora Aboriginal peoples, by the end of summer 2016. In addition, a number and prior to the arrival of Europeans, Georges River of generous donations were received from local was formerly known as Tucoerah River. companies and LAG members. From its source east of Appin within the Wollondilly Council’s Environment Management team have Shire & Wollongong Local government area, the assured the LAG Environment Group has the correct Georges River flows north through rugged sandstone indemnity in place while working on public land, and gorges to the east of Campbelltown, roughly parallel Council Parks and Gardens staff support LAG in to the Main South railway line, with its eastern bank removing noxious waste.
    [Show full text]
  • MPW Stage 3 Location
    9 April 2020 Fei Chen Graduate Project Manager Tactical Group Dear Fei, Re: Non-Aboriginal Heritage Assessment: Moorebank Precinct West Stage 3 Artefact Heritage (Artefact) has been engaged by Tactical Group (Tactical), on behalf of the Sydney Intermodal Terminal Alliance (SIMTA), to prepare this non-Aboriginal heritage assessment to inform the Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 3 Environmental Impact Assessment. SIMTA has been issued Development Consent (SSD 5066) for MPW Stage 1 and (SSD 7709) for MPW Stage 2, under Part 4, Division 4.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), to construct and operate an intermodal terminal (IMT) and associated warehouses on the western side of Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank (the MPW site). It is understood that as part of MPW Stage 3, SIMTA propose to progressively subdivide the WPW site and establish a temporary works compound and associated road and underground utilities on the southern half of the MPW site. The purpose of this report is to provide a non-Aboriginal heritage assessment for the proposed works in accordance with the Planning Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) issued for MPW Stage 3 (SSD 10431) on 20 March 2020. The report would inform the MPW Stage 3 EIS and confirm if the impacts will be consistent with the approved SSD 5066 and SSD 7709. A separate Aboriginal heritage assessment has also been prepared to inform MPW Stage 3. MPW Stage 3 Location The MPW site is generally bounded by the Georges River to the west, Moorebank Avenue to the east, the East Hills Railway Line to the south and the M5 Motorway to the north (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Heritage Impact
    STATEMENT OF HERITAGE IMPACT 25-35 SCOTT STREET LIVERPOOL NSW 2170 NOVEMBER 2015 NBRS & PARTNERS Pty Ltd Level 3, 4 Glen Street Milsons Point NSW 2061 Australia Telephone +61 2 9922 2344 - Facsimile +61 2 9922 1308 ABN: 16 002 247 565 Nominated Architects Geoffrey Deane: Reg No.3766; Garry Hoddinett: Reg No 5286; Andrew Duffin: Reg No 5602 This report has been prepared under the guidance of the Expert Witness Code of Conduct in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and the provisions relating to expert evidence This document remains the property of NBRS & PARTNERS Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was produced. Unauthorised use of the document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Issued: Revision A — 26 October 2015 Final Rev A — 2 November 2015 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Site Location ............................................................................................... 4 1.2 Methodology ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Heritage Listings ......................................................................................... 5 1.4 Heritage Significance .................................................................................. 6 1.5 Authorship ................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Documentary Evidence ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nsw Estuary and River Water Levels Annual Summary 2015-2016
    NSW ESTUARY AND RIVER WATER LEVELS ANNUAL SUMMARY 2015–2016 Report MHL2474 November 2016 prepared for NSW Office of Environment and Heritage This page intentionally blank NSW ESTUARY AND RIVER WATER LEVELS ANNUAL SUMMARY 2015–2016 Report MHL2474 November 2016 Peter Leszczynski 110b King Street Manly Vale NSW 2093 T: 02 9949 0200 E: [email protected] W: www.mhl.nsw.gov.au Cover photograph: Coraki photo from the web camera, Richmond River Document control Issue/ Approved for issue Author Reviewer Revision Name Date Draft 21/10/2016 B Tse, MHL S Dakin, MHL A Joyner 26/10/2016 Final 04/11/2016 M Fitzhenry, OEH A Joyner 04/11/2016 © Crown in right of NSW through the Department of Finance, Services and Innovation 2016 The data contained in this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Manly Hydraulics Laboratory and the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage permit this material to be reproduced, for educational or non-commercial use, in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. While this report has been formulated with all due care, the State of New South Wales does not warrant or represent that the report is free from errors or omissions, or that it is exhaustive. The State of NSW disclaims, to the extent permitted by law, all warranties, representations or endorsements, express or implied, with regard to the report including but not limited to, all implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraordinary Sequence of Severe Weather Events in the Late-Nineteenth Century
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science, 2020, 70, 252–279 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19041 Extraordinary sequence of severe weather events in the late-nineteenth century Jeff Callaghan Retired. Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane, Qld., Australia. Postal address: 3/34 Macalister Road, Tweed Heads, NSW 2486, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Between 1883 and 1898, 24 intense tropical cyclones and extra tropical cyclones directly impacted on the southern Queensland and northern New South Wales coasts, with at least 200 fatalities in what was then a sparsely populated area. These events also caused record floods and rainfall, for example Brisbane City experienced its two largest ever floods over this period and Brisbane City set a 24-h rainfall record that still stands today. Additionally, a 24-h rainfall total of 907 mm occurred in a tributary of the upper Brisbane River resulting in a 15-m wall of water advancing down the river. Recent studies have shown that this part of Australia incurs the largest weather-related insurance losses. A major focus in this study is the seas these storms generated, leading to the loss of many marine craft and changes these waves brought to coastal areas. As a famous example of coastal erosion near Brisbane, the continual impacts from large waves caused a channel to form through Stradbroke Island to the open ocean forming two separate islands. Details of how this channel formed are described in relation to the storms. A climatology study of 239 Australian east coast storms that caused severe ocean damage between Brisbane and the Victorian border over the period between 1876 and February 2020 showed that 153 events occurred with a positive Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) trend and 86 events with a negative trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Directions
    Residential Development Study Part One Strategic Directions for the Future Residential Development of the City of Bankstown October 2009 Bankstown City Council Residential Development Study–Part One 1 October 2009 Bankstown City Council Part One–Contents Introduction 3 About the Residential Development Study 5 Background Study Area Study Objectives Study Outcomes Local Context: Strengths & Challenges 9 Land & Housing Stock Analysis Environmental Analysis Demographic Analysis Market Analysis Affordable Housing Analysis Economic Analysis Infrastructure & Transport Analysis Urban Design Analysis Strategic Directions 16 Action 1–Stage the supply of housing numbers Action 2–Distribute supply in centres and neighbourhood areas Action 3–Support the renewal of 13 centres Action 4–Prepare more detailed plans to support renewal of centres Action 5–Stage the supply of housing numbers in centres after 2022 Action 6–Consideration of planning proposals Summary of Hierarchy in the City of Bankstown 27 Bankstown CBD Yagoona Padstow Revesby Chester Hill Bass Hill Panania Greenacre Sefton Rookwood Road Precinct East Hills Birrong Punchbowl Conclusion 53 Residential Development Study–Part One 2 October 2009 Bankstown City Council Introduction Our Guide for Shaping the City of Bankstown to 2031 The City of Bankstown is a great place, shaped by cultural diversity, strong economy, rivers and parks; and has many competing demands. As part of the State Government’s plans to grow Sydney and accommodate more people, the City of Bankstown is expected to increase its housing numbers by 22,000 and generate 6,000 new jobs. The challenge for Council is to find a way to make these increases and still ensure that transport, infrastructure and services keep pace with the growing population, without negative impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]