DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Budget Overview Fiscal Year 2019 Congressional Justification FEMA - 1 Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Table of Contents Federal Emergency Management Agency .........................................................................................................................................................................1 Appropriation Organization Structure............................................................................................................................................................................3 Strategic Context ................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Budget Comparison and Adjustments ...........................................................................................................................................................................15 Personnel Compensation and Benefits ...........................................................................................................................................................................19 Non Pay Budget Exhibits.................................................................................................................................................................................................20 Supplemental Budget Justification Exhibits .................................................................................................................................................................22 FEMA - 2 Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency Appropriation Organization Structure Organization Name Level Fund Type (* Includes Defense Funding) Federal Emergency Management Agency Component Operations and Support Appropriation Mission Support PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Regional Operations PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Mitigation PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Preparedness and Protection PPA Discretionary - Appropriation* Response and Recovery PPA Response PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Recovery PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Procurement, Construction, and Improvements Appropriation Operational Communications/Information Technology PPA Discretionary - Appropriation* Construction and Facility Improvements PPA Discretionary - Appropriation* Mission Support Assets and Infrastructure PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Federal Assistance Appropriation Grants PPA State Homeland Security Grant Program PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Urban Area Security Initiative PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Public Transportation Security Assistance PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Port Security Grants PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Countering Violent Extremism PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Presidential Residence Protection Assistance PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Assistance to Firefighters Grants PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grants PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Emergency Management Performance Grants PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Predisaster Mitigation Grant PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Flood Hazard Mapping and Risk Analysis Program (RiskMAP) PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Emergency Food and Shelter PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Education, Training, and Exercises PPA Center for Domestic Preparedness PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Center for Homeland Defense and Security PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Emergency Management Institute PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation FEMA - 3 Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Organization Name Level Fund Type (* Includes Defense Funding) U.S. Fire Administration PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation National Domestic Preparedness Consortium PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Continuing Training Grants PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation National Exercise Program PPA Level II Discretionary - Appropriation Disaster Relief Fund Appropriation Base Disaster Relief PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Disaster Relief Category PPA Discretionary - Major Disasters (DRF) National Flood Insurance Program Appropriation Mission Support PPA Discretionary - Offsetting Fee Floodplain Management and Flood Mapping PPA Discretionary - Offsetting Fee National Flood Insurance Fund PPA Mandatory - Fee National Flood Insurance Reserve Fund PPA Mandatory - Fee Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Appropriation Discretionary - Appropriation Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program Appropriation Discretionary - Appropriation FEMA - 4 Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency Strategic Context Component Overview The strategic context presents the performance budget by tying together strategy, budget resource requests, programs, or PPAs, and performance measures that gauge the delivery of results to our stakeholders. The Common Appropriation Structure (CAS) allows DHS to integrate the strategic programmatic view with our budget view of resources. With this structure, a significant portion of the Level 1 PPAs represent what DHS refers to as our mission programs. A mission program is a group of activities acting together to accomplish a specific high-level outcome external to DHS and include operational processes, skills, technology, human capital, and other resources. FEMA’s mission programs are presented below. The Mission Support program was also included for it has publically reported measures. Performance measures associated with these programs are presented in two measure sets, strategic and management measures. Strategic measures communicate results delivered for our agency goals by these programs and are considered our Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) measures. Additional management measures are displayed to provide a more thorough context of expected program performance for the Component related to its budgetary plans. Disaster Relief Fund: The Disaster Relief Fund is used to fund eligible response and recovery efforts associated with major domestic emergencies/disasters that overwhelm state and tribal resources pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, P.L. 93-288, as amended. Through this fund, FEMA is authorized to provide disaster support activities as well as authorize eligible state, tribal, territorial, and local actions. Measure: Percent of recovery services through Individual Assistance delivered to disaster survivors gauging the quality of program services, supporting infrastructure, and customer satisfaction following a disaster Description: FEMA commits to helping survivors recover from federally declared disasters and the Office of Response and Recovery (ORR) is instrumental to fulfilling this commitment. The Individual Assistance (IA) Program is integral to improving the clarity of and access to actionable information, streamlining and simplifying processes and policies to ensure that survivors receive disaster assistance quickly and conveniently.FEMA-ORR developed the Recovery Services IA Measure to report on how well FEMA is delivering on this commitment. The Recovery Services IA Measure is a composite measure comprised of five weighted performance indicators to produce a percentage reflecting FEMA’s role in delivering quality services to disaster survivors. The breakdown of this composite measure is as follows: Providing temporary housing assistance – 35%; Disaster Case Management – 20%; Availability of Grant Management and Registration Systems – 25%; Call Center Response Time – 10%; and, Organization Staffing – 10% Fiscal Year: FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Target: 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 95.0% 96.0% Result: 91.5% 96.9% 95.3% 95.4% TBD TBD FEMA - 5 Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Measure: Percent of recovery services through Public Assistance delivered to communities gauging the quality of program services, supporting infrastructure, and customer satisfaction following a disaster Description: FEMA makes a commitment to helping communities recover from federally declared disasters and the Office of Response and Recovery (ORR) is instrumental to fulfilling this commitment. Supporting and ensuring our citizens have quality assistance after a disaster is critical to facilitating a community's recovery. The Public Assistance (PA) Program is integral to improving the clarity of and access to actionable information, streamlining and simplifying processes and policies to ensure that survivors receive disaster assistance quickly and conveniently. ORR developed this measure to report on how well FEMA is meeting this commitment. The measure is a composite measure comprised of three weighted performance indicators to produce a percentage reflecting FEMA’s role in delivering quality services to communities. The breakdown is as follows: Timely Kick-Off Meetings – 41%; Availability of Grant Management – 32%; and, Organization Staffing – 27%. Fiscal Year: FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011
    S. HRG. 111–811 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 3607 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME- LAND SECURITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 54–971 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio JACK REED, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BEN NELSON, Nebraska MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JON TESTER, Montana ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania CHARLES J. HOUY, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Infrastructure Threat Information Sharing Framework a Reference Guide for the Critical Infrastructure Community
    Critical Infrastructure Threat Information Sharing Framework A Reference Guide for the Critical Infrastructure Community October 2016 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THREAT INFORMATION SHARING FRAMEWORK Page intentionally left blank. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THREAT INFORMATION SHARING FRAMEWORK Contents Quick Reference Guide for Critical Infrastructure Owners and Operators, .................................. iii Report Threats and Incidents ...................................................................................................... iii Report Suspicious Activity ...................................................................................................... iii Report Suspected or Known Cyber Incidents .......................................................................... iv Report Physical Infrastructure Incidents .................................................................................. iv Become a Partner in the “If You See Something, Say Something™” Campaign ................... iv Receive Threat Information Relevant to Your Sector ................................................................ iv Access Threat Prevention and Protection Related Training and Exercises .............................. v Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Support Function 15: Standard Operating Procedures
    Emergency Support Function 15 Standard Operating Procedures July 2019 Emergency Support Function 15 Standard Operating Procedures July 2019 ______________________________________________________________________________ July 19, 2019 Preface and Transmittal Providing the public timely and accurate lifesaving information during major incidents remains our highest priority. The Emergency Support Function (ESF) 15 Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) 2019 edition is our primary guiding document to coordinate outreach and ensure consistent public information through an integrated Federal incident communications system. This document, an update to the 2016 SOP, builds upon the external affairs policy established in Presidential Policy Directive 8, Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5, the National Response Framework, National Incident Management System and Incident Command System. This 2019 SOP has been updated using lessons learned from Hurricane Maria, nation state nuclear threat communication planning and other impacts from the 2017 and 2018 hurricane seasons. This version also includes two new Department of Homeland Security components: Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Office and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). The SOP will be continually reviewed, and users are encouraged to submit comments and recommendations to the incident communications team within Department of Homeland Security Public Affairs or specific department or agency points of contacts as applicable. We encourage all participants
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual 2020
    FEMA Preparedness Grants Manual FEMA Grant Programs Directorate February 2020 Preparedness Grants Manual | February 2020 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 About the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 7 Overview of FEMA 7 Overview of Preparedness Grant Programs 7 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) 7 Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP) 8 Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) 8 Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) 8 Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP) 8 Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) Program – Amtrak 8 Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) 8 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) 8 Foreword 9 The National Preparedness Goal 9 Pre-Award Application and Submission 10 Pre-Submission Information 10 Agreeing to Terms and Conditions of the Award 10 Address to Request Application Package 11 Steps Required to Obtain a Unique Entity Identifier, Register in the System for Award Management (SAM), and Submit an Application 11 Electronic Delivery 12 How to Register to Apply through Grants.gov 12 How to Submit an Initial Application to DHS/FEMA via Grants.gov 14 Submitting the Final Application in Non-Disaster Grants System (ND Grants) 15 Timely Receipt Requirements and Proof of Timely Submission 15 Content and Form of Application Submission 15 Intergovernmental Review 16 Funding Restrictions and Allowable Costs 16 Award Determination and Obligation 19 Allocations 19 Risk Methodology 19 Application Evaluation Criteria 19 Supplemental Financial Integrity Review 20 Review and Selection Process 20 Federal Award
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate, FY19 Congressional Budget Justification
    Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Budget Overview Fiscal Year 2019 Congressional Justification S&T - 1 Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Table of Contents Science and Technology Directorate ..................................................................................................................................................................................1 Appropriation Organization Structure............................................................................................................................................................................3 Strategic Context ................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Budget Comparison and Adjustments .............................................................................................................................................................................8 Personnel Compensation and Benefits ...........................................................................................................................................................................11 Non Pay Budget Exhibits.................................................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • National Urban Security Technology Laboratory 2015 Annual Report
    National Urban Security Technology Laboratory Annual Report 2015 National Urban Security Technology Laboratory 2015 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 5 WE ARE NUSTL 10 PARTNERING AND COLLABORATING WITH THE NATIONAL FIRST RESPONDER COMMUNITY 14 Collaboration Hub for the Homeland Security Enterprise 15 Partnership List 22 New York Area Science and Technology Forum 24 TEST AND EVALUATION 24 System Assessment and Validation for Emergency Responders 27 Urban Operational Experimentation 29 Responder Technologies Testing Support 31 Performance Testing and Evaluation at NUSTL 34 Responder Training and Exercise Support for Securing the Cities 35 Radiological Emergency Management System 36 New York City Fire Department Community Reception Center Technical Support 37 Domestic Nuclear Detection Office Testing and Evaluation, Radiation Awareness and Interdiction Network Advanced Technology Demonstration Support 38 Neutron Benchmarking 40 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 40 Radiological/Nuclear Response and Recovery Research and Development 40 Facilitating Demonstrations to Improve First Responder Capabilities 42 Laying the Foundation for Radiological Expertise Within an Emergency Response 43 Researching the Viability of Improving Emergency Managers’ Decision-Making Skills Through Game Training 43 Initiating and Continuing Innovative RNRR R&D Project to Support Local and State Response Capabilities 46 QUALITY MANAGEMENT 48 SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 50 PERSONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 52 DECOMMISSIONING AND DECONTAMINATION 54
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Resiliency Guide Counter-Improvised Explosive Device (C-IED) Concepts, Common Goals, and Available Assistance
    Security and Resiliency Guide Counter-Improvised Explosive Device (C-IED) Concepts, Common Goals, and Available Assistance Counter-IED Concepts, Common Goals, and Available Assistance Acknowledgements This guide would not be possible without the contribution of numerous improvised explosive device (IED) and counter-IED (C-IED) subject matter experts, stakeholders, and professional communities. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Infrastructure Protection (IP) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG) wish to acknowledge contributions made by the following organizations: the DHS Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) and FBI Counter-IED Section (C-IEDS); local, state, tribal, and territorial emergency management stakeholders through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Integration Center; Federal department and agency stakeholders through the Joint Program Office for Countering IEDs, especially the Department of Justice (DOJ) Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), FBI Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate, FBI Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center (TEDAC), DHS Transportation Security Administration (TSA), FEMA, DHS Office of Health Affairs (OHA), DHS Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A), National Figure 1: Seals of programs making up Counterterrorism Center, Department of State Bureau of Counterterrorism the Joint Program Office and Diplomatic Security Service, and Department of Defense (DOD) Joint Property of DHS Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization (JIDO); private sector and government critical infrastructure stakeholders through the Sector Coordinating Councils, Government Coordinating Councils, State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Government Coordinating Council (SLTTGCC), and Regional Consortium Coordinating Council (RC3); and nationwide law enforcement stakeholders through the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Arson and Explosives Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • DHS Private Sector Resources Catalog
    Private Sector Resources Catalog May 2010 Intentionally blank page. Please continue to the next page. 2 Contents Letter from Assistant Secretary Douglas A. Smith .......................................................................... 4 Department-wide Resources........................................................................................................... 5 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) ..................................................................... 7 Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman (CIS Ombudsman) ..................................... 8 U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) ................................................................................................................ 9 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ................................................................................. 10 CBP Publications and Guidance ..............................................................................................................10 CBP Alerts and Newsletters ...................................................................................................................10 CBP Technical Assistance ......................................................................................................................10 CBP Programs and services ....................................................................................................................11 Cybersecurity and Communications (CS&C) ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Budget in Brief: Fiscal Year 2017
    BUDGET IN BRIEF FISCAL YEAR 2017 Budget-in-Brief Fiscal Year 2017 Homeland Security www.dhs.gov Message from the Secretary The President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Budget Request of $40.6 billion for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reflects our continued commitment to the security of our homeland and the American Public. Homeland security is the most important mission any government can provide to its people. This FY 2017 Budget Request provides funding to sustain and strengthen our most critical programs and capabilities in each of our mission areas—preventing terrorism and enhancing security, securing and managing our borders, enforcing and administering our immigration laws, safeguarding and securing cyberspace, and strengthening national preparedness and resilience. Table of Contents I. Overview .................................................................................................................................1 Department of Homeland Security Funding Priorities…………………………………...…2 Prevent Terrorism and Enhance Security…………………………………………………2 Secure and Manage Our Borders………………………………………………………….3 Enforce and Administer Our Immigration Laws …………………………………………5 Safeguard and Secure Cyberspace………………………………………..……....……….5 Strengthen National Preparedness and Resilience………….………………..………...….6 Total Budget Authority…………………………………..………………………...……...8 FY 2017 Percent of Total Budget Authority by Organization………………..………..….9 Total Budget Authority by Organization Gross Discretionary, Mandatory, Fees, and Trust Funds………. ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Private Sector Resources Catalog Index
    Appendix B – Index Appendix B – Index Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Counterterrorism Workshop, 20 Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Recognition and Detection for Railroad Industry Employees Training A (CD), 20 Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Search Procedures Workshop, 20 Academic Engagement Multi-Jurisdiction Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Security Plan (MJIEDSP), 20 Automating Software Assurance, 49 Protective Measures Course, 20 Cybersecurity Research and Development Center (CSRDC), 47 Technical Resource for Incident Prevention (TRIPwire), 39 Electronic Crimes Task Force (ECTF) Program, 15 TRIPwire Community Gateway (TWCG), 21 Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) Programs, 7 Border Security National Nuclear Forensics Expertise Development Program (NNFEDP), 34 1-800 BE ALERT, 40 Project CAMPUS Sentinel, 45 Anti-dumping Countervailing Duties Search (ADD/CVD), 41 Science and Technology Directorate‘s Career Development Grants (CDG) Program, 24 Border Entry Wait Times, 42 The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), 45 CBP Laboratories and Scientific Services, 13 ‑ Voluntary Private Sector Preparedness Accreditation and Certification Program (PS Prep), 51 CBP Newsroom, News Magazine and Alerts, 40 Activity Reporting DHS Center of Excellence: National Center for Border Security and Immigration (NCBSI), 40 ―If You See Something, Say SomethingTM‖ Campaign, 37 eAllegations, 40 1-800 BE ALERT, 40 Entry Process into United States, 42 AIRBUST Program, 18 Global Entry, 42 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Chemical
    [Show full text]
  • The Department of Homeland Security Intelligence Enterprise: Operational Overview and Oversight Challenges for Congress
    The Department of Homeland Security Intelligence Enterprise: Operational Overview and Oversight Challenges for Congress Mark A. Randol Specialist in Domestic Intellengence and Counter-Terrorism March 19, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40602 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Department of Homeland Security Intelligence Enterprise Summary The primary mission of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS, the Department) is to “prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism, and minimize the damage, and assist in the recovery from terrorist attacks that do occur in the United States. Since its inception in 2003, DHS has had an intelligence component to support this mission and has been a member of the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC). Following a major reorganization of the DHS (called the Second Stage Review or “2SR”) in July 2005, former Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff established a strengthened Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) and made the Assistant Secretary for Information Analysis (now Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis) the Chief Intelligence Officer for the Department. He also tasked I&A with ensuring that intelligence is coordinated, fused, and analyzed within the Department to provide a common operational picture; provide a primary connection between DHS and the IC as a whole; and to act as a primary source of information for state, local and private sector partners. Today, the DHS Intelligence Enterprise (DHS IE) consists of I&A, two headquarters elements supported by I&A, and the intelligence elements of six DHS operational components: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DHS Budget in Brief
    FY 2022 Budget in Brief Budget-in-Brief Fiscal Year 2022 Homeland Security www.dhs.gov Message from the Secretary The President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget of $52.2 billion for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) invests in key DHS missions and reflects our commitment to protect the homeland at our borders, in cyberspace, and beyond. The personnel of this Department are charged with protecting our country, our people, and our way of life by safeguarding trade, travel, transportation, personal freedoms, and economic prosperity. The FY 2022 President's Budget will support the Department' s critical missions. The FY 2022 President' s Budget provides the Department with targeted resources to advance commonsense policy solutions that will keep our country safe, strong, and prosperous. This includes smart investments to promote a humane and efficient immigration system, protect civil rights, bolster cyber defenses and resilience, and address the root causes of domestic terrorism. The discretionary request also includes investments to combat climate change and increases funding for research and development. Alejandr N. Mayorkas Secretary of Homeland Security Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Funding Priorities...................................................................................................................... 1 Summary Information by DHS Organization ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]