Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate, FY19 Congressional Budget Justification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate, FY19 Congressional Budget Justification Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Budget Overview Fiscal Year 2019 Congressional Justification S&T - 1 Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Table of Contents Science and Technology Directorate ..................................................................................................................................................................................1 Appropriation Organization Structure............................................................................................................................................................................3 Strategic Context ................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Budget Comparison and Adjustments .............................................................................................................................................................................8 Personnel Compensation and Benefits ...........................................................................................................................................................................11 Non Pay Budget Exhibits.................................................................................................................................................................................................12 Supplemental Budget Justification Exhibits .................................................................................................................................................................13 S&T - 2 Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Science and Technology Directorate Appropriation Organization Structure Organization Name Level Fund Type (* Includes Defense Funding) Science and Technology Directorate Component Operations and Support Appropriation Mission Support PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Laboratory Facilities PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Acquisition and Operations Analysis PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Procurement, Construction, and Improvements Appropriation Laboratory Facilities PPA Discretionary - Appropriation Research and Development Appropriation Research, Development and Innovation PPA Discretionary - Appropriation University Programs PPA Discretionary - Appropriation S&T - 3 Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Science and Technology Directorate Strategic Context Component Overview The strategic context presents the performance budget by tying together strategy, budget resource requests, programs, or PPAs, and performance measures that gauge the delivery of results to our stakeholders. The Common Appropriation Structure (CAS) allows DHS to integrate the strategic programmatic view with our budget view of resources. With this structure, a significant portion of the Level 1 PPAs represent what DHS refers to as our mission programs. Mission support programs are also an important subset of our Level 1 PPAs that provide products and/or services to mission programs. Mission support capabilities include research and development, intelligence, training, and information sharing. Mission support programs may be crosscutting and support multiple mission programs. Mission support also includes enterprise leadership, management and/or business administration services and describes the capabilities and activities that support the day-to-day management and back office functions enabling the Department to operate efficiently and effectively. Performance measures associated with our programs are presented in two measure sets, strategic and management measures. Strategic measures communicate results delivered for our agency goals by programs and are considered our Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) measures. Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) mission support programs having publically reported measures are presented below. Acquisition and Operations Analysis: The Acquisition and Operations Analysis programs provide expert assistance to entities across the homeland security enterprise to ensure that the transition, acquisition, and deployment of technologies and information improve the efficiency and effectiveness of operational capabilities across the homeland security enterprise. This program assists in testing and evaluation, standards development, requirements analysis, systems engineering, and supporting technology transition. Management Measures Measure: Number of SAFETY Act "transition" (new, highly innovative) technologies awarded Description: In order to stay up to date with the continually changing nature of terrorism, the Office of SAFETY (Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies) Act Implementation (OSAI) will seek out those evolving technologies that can serve a homeland security mission and provide coverage to enable their transition into the commercial market, at a rate of 20 percent a year. A "transition" technology is defined as any technology that is awarded Developmental Testing and Evaluation (DTE) Designation, and those that can be considered new and innovative (i.e. a new technological application in the homeland security arena). OSAI is actively seeking out these technologies in an effort to address the ever-changing nature of terrorism. The SAFETY Act program is the only federal program that attempts to help industry transition these developmental technologies into the commercial marketplace. Fiscal Year: FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Target: 21 21 21 18 18 18 Result: 22 17 18 10 TBD TBD S&T - 4 Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Measure: Percent of Capability Development Support Group program milestones that are met, as established in the fiscal year's budget execution plan Description: This measure reflects the Capability Development Support (CDS) Group milestones that are met, or completed, as established in the fiscal year budget execution plan. These milestones reflect the programmatic and technical events, accomplishments, or intermediate goals in the life of CDS projects and programs. These milestones indicate satisfactory progress toward achieving long-term program performance goals and Department-wide goals and objectives. In particular, this measure captures the contribution of CDS in supporting decisions resulting in improved acquisition and research and development outcomes across DHS. When CDS completes tests and evaluations, technical assessments, standards and operations analyses, and process analyses, the results of these analyses inform decisions for DHS Components, Acquisitions Review Board, Joint Requirements Council (JRC), Research and Development (R&D) programs, standards community, and S&T that improve acquisition and R&D outcomes. Fiscal Year: FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Target: 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% Result: 87% 100% 95% 100% TBD TBD Measure: Percent of Research and Development Partnerships (RDP) program milestones that are met, as established in the fiscal year's budget execution plan Description: This measure reflects the Research and Development Partnerships (RDP) Group program milestones that meet their fiscal year budget execution and five-year plan goals. RDP conducts extensive outreach efforts with members of the Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) based on the strategic and programmatic needs of the DHS and S&T. The RDP assists in both “transmitting and receiving information” to stakeholders across the HSE. The RDP enables opportunities for evaluating, expediting and monitoring the execution of programs with an increased speed-of-execution compared to “in-house only” activities. RDP maintains extensive contacts and key references to conduct outreach, and provide research and funding opportunities to the public and private sectors both domestically and internationally. Fiscal Year: FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Target: 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% Result: 77% 80% 88% 81% TBD TBD Research, Development, and Innovation: Research, Development, and Innovation is a portfolio of customer-focused and output-oriented research, development, testing, and evaluation programs. The FY 2019 program consists of portfolios to including: Border Security, Chemical/Biological/ Explosives Defense, Counter Terrorist, and First Responder and Disaster Resilience. These portfolios support the needs of the operational components of the Department and the first responder community to address capability gaps. S&T - 5 Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Strategic Measures Measure: Percent of Apex technologies or knowledge products transitioned to customers for planned improvements in the Homeland Security Enterprise Description: This measure gauges the transition of high priority, and high value research and development projects known as Apex projects. Apex technologies and knowledge products are quickly delivered to improve homeland security operations. Apex products consist of cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary efforts which employ 3 to 5 year innovation cycles from project inception through operational testing. Fiscal Year: FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Target: --- 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% Result: --- 82% 100% 83% TBD TBD Measure: Percent of planned cybersecurity products and
Recommended publications
  • Migrants & City-Making
    MIGRANTS & CITY-MAKING This page intentionally left blank MIGRANTS & CITY-MAKING Dispossession, Displacement, and Urban Regeneration Ayşe Çağlar and Nina Glick Schiller Duke University Press • Durham and London • 2018 © 2018 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper ∞ Typeset in Minion and Trade Gothic type by BW&A Books, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Çaglar, Ayse, author. | Schiller, Nina Glick, author. Title: Migrants and city-making : multiscalar perspectives on dispossession / Ayse Çaglar and Nina Glick Schiller. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2018004045 (print) | lccn 2018008084 (ebook) | isbn 9780822372011 (ebook) | isbn 9780822370444 (hardcover : alk. paper) | isbn 9780822370567 (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: lcsh : Emigration and immigration—Social aspects. | Immigrants—Turkey—Mardin. | Immigrants— New Hampshire—Manchester. | Immigrants—Germany— Halle an der Saale. | City planning—Turkey—Mardin. | City planning—New Hampshire—Manchester. | City planning—Germany—Halle an der Saale. Classification: lcc jv6225 (ebook) | lcc jv6225 .S564 2018 (print) | ddc 305.9/06912091732—dc23 lc record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018004045 Cover art: Multimedia Center, Halle Saale. Photo: Alexander Schieberle, www.alexschieberle.de To our mothers and fathers, Sitare and Adnan Şimşek and Evelyn and Morris Barnett, who understood the importance of having daughters who
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Communities FY 2011 Budget in Brief
    FY 2011 Budget in Brief ICE FOIA 10-2674.000473 Budget-in-Brief Fiscal Year 2011 Homeland Security www.dhs.gov ICE FOIA 10-2674.000474 ICE FOIA 10-2674.000475 “As a nation, we will do everything in our power to protect our country. As Americans, we will never give in to fear or division. We will be guided by our hopes, our unity, and our deeply held values. That's who we are as Americans … And we will continue to do everything that we can to keep America safe in the new year and beyond.” President Barack Obama December 28, 2009 ICE FOIA 10-2674.000476 ICE FOIA 10-2674.000477 Table of Contents I. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Vision and Mission.......................................................... 1 II. Fiscal Year 2011 Overview................................................................................................................. 3 DHS Total Budget Authority by Funding: Fiscal Years 2009–2011............................................... 13 FY 2011 Percent of Total Budget Authority by Organization .......................................................... 15 Total Budget Authority by Organization: Fiscal Years 2009–2011................................................. 17 III. Efficiency Review & Progress ……………………………………………………………………. 19 IV. Accomplishments …………………………………………………………………………………..21 V. Summary Information by Organization ............................................................................................ 29 Departmental Management and Operations ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acronyms Abbreviations &Terms
    Acronyms Abbreviations &Terms A Capability Assurance Job Aid FEMA P-524 / July 2009 FEMA Acronyms Abbreviations and Terms Produced by the National Preparedness Directorate, National Integration Center, Incident Management Systems Integration Division Please direct requests for additional copies to: FEMA Publications (800) 480-2520 Or download the document from the Web: www.fema.gov/plan/prepare/faat.shtm U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency The FEMA Acronyms, Abbreviations & Terms (FAAT) List is not designed to be an authoritative source, merely a handy reference and a living document subject to periodic updating. Inclusion recognizes terminology existence, not legitimacy. Entries known to be obsolete (see new “Obsolete or Replaced” section near end of this document) are included because they may still appear in extant publications and correspondence. Your comments and recommendations are welcome. Please electronically forward your input or direct your questions to: [email protected] Please direct requests for additional copies to: FEMA Publications (800) 480-2520 Or download the document from the Web: www.fema.gov/plan/prepare/faat.shtm 2SR Second Stage Review ABEL Agent Based Economic Laboratory 4Wd Four Wheel Drive ABF Automatic Broadcast Feed A 1) Activity of Isotope ABHS Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer 2) Ampere ABI Automated Broker Interface 3) Atomic Mass ABIH American Board of Industrial Hygiene A&E Architectural and Engineering ABIS see IDENT A&FM Aviation and Fire Management ABM Anti-Ballistic Missile
    [Show full text]
  • Global Entry Interview Requirements
    Global Entry Interview Requirements Is Gustavus crenellated or regionalist when disbelieved some wiseacres layers ovally? Toughened Davie bringings beastly Foxwhile still Patrick plasters always his hydrocellulosealleviate his colonelcy perceptually. make-peace preciously, he restitutes so decorative. Permanganic and lichenoid Find interview scheduled for the sentri or global entry interview together, of a valid so the content, or legal right on the letter All require that interview and requirements in a professor can use this frustration of time! If required for fingerprint and interview today, and submission of external site, you do i work. You can rejoice for Global Entry Renewal one kneel before the expiration date given your current membership. Us customs or interview. Enrollment on Arrival US Customs the Border Protection. Application interview at global entry interviews at terminal as required to require passports and policy and teachers launch of what stops a big pads. It was brief: because of time, difficult days as usual wait for food and requirements and customs when and techniques can also i am bringing ineligible family. How long are required by you are medically necessary. You can check use the available Global Entry interview locations and time slots in this Global Entry. How a get Global Entry faster TravelSkills. Even hire you looking only occasionally, jobs, think again. Guide to Global Entry Application and Interview Process 2020. The passport agency is processing passport renewal. All applicants undergo a rose background check card in-person interview. The entire interview process was less common half and hour. Food deals to brighten your days, Plaza Premium Lounges, people need or apply extract the program and complete some rigorous screening process.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011
    S. HRG. 111–811 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 3607 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME- LAND SECURITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 54–971 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio JACK REED, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BEN NELSON, Nebraska MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JON TESTER, Montana ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania CHARLES J. HOUY, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C.
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Bulletin and Decisions, Vol
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection ◆ 8 CFR Part 217 CHANGES TO THE VISA WAIVER PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT THE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION (ESTA) PROGRAM AND THE FEE FOR USE OF THE SYSTEM AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection; DHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final, with one substantive change, interim amendments to DHS regulations published in the Federal Register on June 9, 2008 and August 9, 2010 regarding the Elec- tronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). ESTA is the online system through which nonimmigrant aliens intending to enter the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) must obtain a travel authorization in advance of travel to the United States. The June 9, 2008 interim final rule established ESTA and set the require- ments for use for travel through air and sea ports of entry. The August 9, 2010 interim final rule established the fee for ESTA. This document addresses comments received in response to both rules and some operational modifications affecting VWP applicants and travelers since the publication of the interim rules. DATES: This rule is effective on July 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Shepherd, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations, at [email protected] and (202) 344–3710. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents Executive Summary I. Background and Purpose A. The Visa Waiver Program B. The Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) C. The Fee for Use of ESTA and the Travel Promotion Act Fee 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 49, NO.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S . C U S T O M S a N D B O R D E R P R O T E C T I O N * W I N T E R 2 0
    U.S. Customsrontline and Border Protection H Winter 2011 Global Entry Takes ff Easing the way for frequent travelers – page 6 Safeguarding U.S. health, economy – page 14 Pacific partners help secure Northwest – page 18 H The mission of CBP’s Office of Air and Marine, the world’s largest aviation and maritime law enforcement organization, is to protect the American people and the nation’s critical infrastructure through the coordinated use of integrated air and marine forces to detect, interdict and prevent acts of terrorism and the unlawful movement of people, illegal drugs and other contraband across the borders of the United States. photo by John Manheimer Winter 2011 CONTENTS H cover Story 6 Global Entry Takes Off Innovative CBP programs speed travelers through many air and land ports of entry. 6 H FeatureS 14 Plants, Pests and Pathogens CBP agriculture specialists prevent the introduction of harmful pests, plants and plant diseases, animal products and diseases and biological threats into the U.S. 14 18 Pacific Partners In the face of unique challenges, CBP’s partnerships with federal, state, local and international agencies in the Pacific Northwest have become a national model for success. Leaders there say the ingredients for success are built on trust, experience and a realization that working together makes everyone involved better able to accomplish their missions. 18 H DepartmentS 5 Around the Agency 34 Inside A&M How Do I…? 26 CBP Info Center 36 Agriculture Actions CBP Info Center provides guidance to CBP’s global customers trying 28 In Focus 38 CBP History to visit or import products into the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Trusted Traveler Programs
    Trusted Traveler Programs Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Program Global Entry NEXUS SENTRI APEC Click here for additional info. Click here for additional info. Click here for additional info. Click here for additional info. Click here for additional info. Program • TSA Pre✓™ expedited security • Expedited clearance process • Expedited clearance process at • Expedited processing at land • Fast-track immigration lanes at airports in screening at participating airports through CBP at airports and airports and land borders borders when entering the U.S. 21 APEC member countries: Benefits land borders upon arrival in when entering the U.S. and and Mexico by car • Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, the U.S. Canada China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South • Includes the TSA Pre✓™ • Includes Global Entry benefits Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, experience • Includes the TSA Pre✓™ Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, benefits Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, U.S.A., Vietnam • U.S. citizens • U.S. citizens • U.S. citizens • U.S. Citizens • Citizens of an APEC country Eligibility • U.S. lawful permanent residents • U.S. lawful permanent • U.S. lawful permanent • U.S. lawful permanent residents • Bona fide business persons residents residents • Mexico citizens and lawful • Citizens of the Netherlands, • Canadian citizens and lawful permanent residents of Mexico Korea, Mexico, Panama, permanent residents of Germany, U.K. Canada Application Fee $85.00 $100.00 $50.00 $122.25 $70.00 5 yr. membership 5 yr. membership 5 yr. membership 5 yr. membership 3 yr. membership • pply online • Apply online • Apply online • Pre-enroll online • Pre-enroll online Application • Schedule appointment at • Schedule interview at • Schedule interview with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Performance and Accountability Report • U.S
    Introduction Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2016 2016 Performance and Accountability Report • U.S. Customs and Border Protection I This page intentionally left blank. Performance and Accountability Report Mission Statement: To safeguard America’s borders thereby protecting the public from dangerous people and materials while enhancing the Nation’s global economic competitiveness by enabling legitimate trade and travel Core Values Vigilance Service To Country Integrity Vigilance is how we ensure the safety Service to country is embodied in Integrity is our cornerstone. We are of all Americans. We are continuously the work we do. We are dedicated guided by the highest ethical and watchful and alert to deter, detect, to defending and upholding the moral principles. Our actions bring and prevent threats to our Nation. We Constitution and the laws of the honor to ourselves and our Agency. demonstrate courage and valor in the United States. The American people protection of our Nation. have entrusted us to protect the homeland and defend liberty. This page intentionally left blank. About This Report Introduction About This Report The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP, or the agency) Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) combines CBP’s Annual Performance Report with its audited financial statements, assurances on internal control, accountability reporting, and Agency assessments. CBP’s PAR provides program, financial, and performance information that enables Congress, the President, and the public to assess its performance as it relates to the CBP mission. The CBP PAR discusses the Agency’s strategic goals and objectives and compares its actual performance results to performance targets which align with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) major missions established by the DHS Strategic Plan 2014-2018 and that support the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and the GPRA Modernization Act (GPRAMA) of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA Acronyms Abbreviations and Terms
    ERT N RC RAMP C N US&R R I P CS EAS JFO AcronymsND MS Abbreviations & Terms A Capability Assurance Job Aid FEMA-524 / March 2005 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency The FAAT List is not designed to be an authoritative source, merely a handy reference. Inclusion recognizes terminology existence, not legitimacy. Entries known to be obsolete are included because they may still appear in extant publications and correspondence. Your comments and recommendations are welcome. Please electronically forward your input or direct your questions to: [email protected] FEMA Acronyms Abbreviations and Terms Please direct requests for additional copies to: FEMA Publications (800) 480-2520 Or download the document from the Web: www.fema.gov/plan/prepare/faat.shtm A Atomic Mass/Ampere/Activity of Isotope 1) Affirmative Action 2) Allocation Advice AA 3) Applicant Assistance 4) Approval Authority 5) Atomic Absorption 1) Agriculture Adjustment Administration AAA 2) American Automobile Association AAAE American Association of Airport Executives 1) Activity Address Code AAC 2) Applicant Assistance Center AACS Automated Access Control System AAD Assistant Associate Director AADR Age-Adjusted Death Rate AAEI American Association for Exporters and Importers AAER Average Annual Erosion Rate AAFB Andrews Air Force Base Automated Acquisition Management System AAMS (ProTrac / ProDoc) American Association of Motor Vehicle AAMVA Administration AAPA American Association of Port Authorities 1) After-Action Report AAR 2) After action Review
    [Show full text]
  • Homeland Security and R&D in the United States
    A2003:014 Homeland Security and R&D in the United States Magnus Karlsson Homeland Security and R&D in the United States Magnus Karlsson, Science & Technology Attaché Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies Embassy of Sweden, Washington DC ITPS, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies Studentplan 3, SE-831 40 Östersund, Sweden Telephone: +46 (0)63 16 66 00 Fax: +46 (0)63 16 66 01 E-mail [email protected] www.itps.se ISSN 1652-0483 Elanders Gotab, Stockholm 2003 For further information, please contact Magnus Karlsson Telephone +1 202 467 2654 E-mail [email protected] HOMELAND SECURITY AND R&D IN THE UNITED STATES Foreword Since the terrorist attacks in September 2001, the concern for homeland security in the United States has defined a market with a significant growth potential. Both public and private investments in science and technology are increasing, and new institutions and policies are emerging in the area of homeland security. These developments will have an impact on researchers, firms and policy-makers also in Sweden, creating opportunities for collaboration, business and information sharing. The purpose of this report is to create an overview of the structure and funding of homeland security R&D in the United States. The report is relevant for the Swedish science and technology, and security communities and can serve as a basis for further collaboration between Sweden and the United States. The report has been sponsored by the Swedish Emergency Management Agency, the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research. Stockholm, December 2003 Sture Öberg 3 HOMELAND SECURITY AND R&D IN THE UNITED STATES Contents Executive Summary..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Infrastructure Threat Information Sharing Framework a Reference Guide for the Critical Infrastructure Community
    Critical Infrastructure Threat Information Sharing Framework A Reference Guide for the Critical Infrastructure Community October 2016 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THREAT INFORMATION SHARING FRAMEWORK Page intentionally left blank. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THREAT INFORMATION SHARING FRAMEWORK Contents Quick Reference Guide for Critical Infrastructure Owners and Operators, .................................. iii Report Threats and Incidents ...................................................................................................... iii Report Suspicious Activity ...................................................................................................... iii Report Suspected or Known Cyber Incidents .......................................................................... iv Report Physical Infrastructure Incidents .................................................................................. iv Become a Partner in the “If You See Something, Say Something™” Campaign ................... iv Receive Threat Information Relevant to Your Sector ................................................................ iv Access Threat Prevention and Protection Related Training and Exercises .............................. v Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]