DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Research, Development, Acquisitions, and Operations ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Research, Development, Acquisitions, and Operations ____________________________________________________ Fiscal Year 2015 Congressional Justification Table of Contents Page No. I. Appropriation Overview ................................................................................................. 1 II. Summary of FY 2015 Budget Estimates by Program/Project Activity (PPA) ............. 3 III. Current Services Program Description by PPA ........................................................... 4 IV. Program Justification Changes ................................................................................. 93 V. Exhibits and Other Supporting Material ..................................................................... 99 A. Justification of Proposed Legislative Language ...................................................... 99 B. FY 2014 to FY 2015 Budget Change .................................................................... 100 C. Summary of Requirements .................................................................................... 101 D. Summary of Reimbursable Resources ................................................................... 102 E. Summary of Requirements By Object Class.......................................................... 103 F. Permanent Positions by Grade ............................................................................... 104 G. Capital Investment and Construction Initiative Listing ......................................... 105 H. PPA Budget Justifications ..................................................................................... 114 I. Changes In Full Time Employment ........................................................................ 119 J. FY 2015 Schedule of Working Capital Fund by Program/Project Activity .......... 120 K. DHS Balanced Workforce Strategy ....................................................................... 121 BUDGET REQUEST AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION Science and Technology Research, Development, Acquisitions, and Operations I. Appropriation Overview A. Mission Statement for Research, Development, Acquisitions, and Operations: The mission of DHS S&T is to strengthen America’s security and resiliency by providing knowledge products and innovative technology solutions for the Homeland Security Enterprise. Congress created the S&T Directorate under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, to among other things “[conduct] basic and applied research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation activities relevant to any or all elements of the Department.”1 S&T also has a statutory responsibility for establishing a system for transferring homeland security developments or technologies to Federal, State, local governments, and private sector entities. In the past decade, S&T has undergone many changes and continues to evolve. The extraordinary breadth and diversity of DHS’s missions requires S&T to address a wide range of programs including DHS Components’ near-term needs for new operational capabilities and improved operational effectiveness, efficiency, and safety. S&T also has responsibilities related to understanding and creating solutions to biological and chemical threats, and to conducting the research and development (R&D) required to meet homeland cybersecurity needs. While DHS S&T’s work is often identified with technology development, equally important are the Directorate’s contributions to homeland security in the form of analyses or “knowledge products.” These include analyses of alternative technology options; assessments of complex issues such as the relative risk of different chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats; operational testing and evaluation of technologies proposed for acquisition; detailed technical characterization of potential biological threat organisms to support both human and agricultural biodefense; and the creation of consensus standards that enable cost-effective progress across many fields. S&T also manages five national laboratories that provide unique homeland and national security capabilities and has direct access to the Department of Energy’s extensive national laboratory system. In addition, the Directorate’s capacity to engage R&D activities worldwide is greatly augmented by S&T’s nine university-based Centers of Excellence (COEs) and 13 bilateral international agreements. In order to meet the broad scope of our mission, S&T has built a highly trained and technically- proficient staff that is DHS’s core source of science, engineering, and analytical expertise. Using our staff and budget for maximal impact, we have focused our energies on efforts that have a direct and demonstrable link to improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and safety of DHS’s operational missions and enhancing the safety, interoperability, and communications capabilities of the first responder community. S&T’s contributions to the Department and the Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) fall into four general categories: New capabilities and knowledge products – S&T creates new technological capabilities that address DHS operational needs or are necessary to address evolving homeland security threats. Process enhancements and efficiencies – S&T conducts systems-based analysis to provide streamlined, resource-saving process improvements to existing operations. 1 Sec. 302(4) of Public Law 107-296 (codified at 6 U.S.C. § 182(4)). 1 Acquisition support – The Department achieves more effective and efficient operations and avoids costly acquisition failures and delays by leveraging S&T’s technical expertise to improve project management, operational analysis, and acquisition management. Understanding of homeland security risks and opportunities – S&T’s relationships across DHS and the HSE contribute to strategic understanding of existing and emerging threats as well as opportunities for collaboration across departmental, interagency, and state/local boundaries. B. Budget Activities: The Directorate has four RDT&E program, project, and activities (PPA), and various thrust areas, each of which has an important role in implementing research and development activities. These four PPAs are: Acquisition and Operations Support; Laboratory Facilities; Research, Development, and Innovation; and University Programs. Acquisition and Operations Support (AOS) AOS provides expert assistance to entities across the homeland security enterprise (HSE) to ensure that the transition, acquisition, and deployment of technologies, information, and procedures improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the operational capabilities across the HSE mission. The five thrust areas of Acquisition and Operations Support are: Operations Research and Analysis; Safety Act; Standards; Technology Transition Support; and Testing and Evaluation. Laboratory Facilities The Office of National Laboratories (ONL) manages the Laboratory Facilities Programs. ONL provides the Nation with a coordinated, enduring core of productive science, technology and engineering laboratories, organizations and institutions, which can provide the knowledge and technology required to secure our homeland. ONL executes two thrust areas: Construction and Lab Operations. Research, Development, and Innovation (RD&I) RD&I provides state-of-the-art technology and/or solutions to meet the needs of the operational components of the Department and the first responder community. It includes customer-focused and output-oriented RDT&E programs that balance risk, cost, impact, and time to delivery. RD&I includes: APEX; Border Security; CBE Defense; Counter Terrorist; Cyber Security/Information Analytics; and First Responder/Disaster Resilience. University Programs University Programs supports critical homeland security-related research and education at U.S. colleges and universities to address high-priority DHS-related issues and to enhance homeland security capabilities over the long term. University Programs includes Centers of Excellence and Minority Serving Institutions. C. Budget Request Summary: The S&T Directorate requests 130 positions, 130 FTE, and $941,671,000 for RDA&O in FY 2015, a decrease of $149,541,000 from FY 2014. The FY 2015 funding reflects a decrease in the CBE Defense, Counter Terrorist, Cyber Security/Information Analytics, and First Responder/Disaster Resilience RDT&E thrust areas. It also includes an increase of $0.191 million for a one-percent Federal pay raise. 2 II. Summary of FY 2015 Budget Estimates by Program/Project Activity (PPA) Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Research, Development, Acquisitions, and Operations Summary of FY 2015 Budget Estimates by Program Project Activity FY 2015 Request (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Increase(+) or Decrease(-) for FY 2015 Program Project Activity Revised Enacted Enacted Request Total Changes Program Changes Adjustments-to-Base POS FTE Amount POS FTE Amount POS FTE Amount POS FTE Amount POS FTE Amount POS FTE Amount Acquisition and Operations Support - - $45,991 - - $41,703 - - $41,703 - - - - - - - - - Research Development and Innovation - - $425,295 - - $462,000 - - $433,788 - - ($28,212) - - ($28,212) - - - University Programs - - $38,339 - - $39,724 - - $31,000 - - ($8,724) - - ($8,724) - - - Laboratory Facilities 128 128 $158,083 130 130 $547,785 130 130 $435,180 - - ($112,605) - - $320,278 - - ($432,883) Subtotal, Discretionary 128 128 $667,708 130 130 $1,091,212 130 130 $941,671 - - ($149,541) - - $283,342 - - ($432,883)
Recommended publications
  • Secure Communities FY 2011 Budget in Brief

    Secure Communities FY 2011 Budget in Brief

    FY 2011 Budget in Brief ICE FOIA 10-2674.000473 Budget-in-Brief Fiscal Year 2011 Homeland Security www.dhs.gov ICE FOIA 10-2674.000474 ICE FOIA 10-2674.000475 “As a nation, we will do everything in our power to protect our country. As Americans, we will never give in to fear or division. We will be guided by our hopes, our unity, and our deeply held values. That's who we are as Americans … And we will continue to do everything that we can to keep America safe in the new year and beyond.” President Barack Obama December 28, 2009 ICE FOIA 10-2674.000476 ICE FOIA 10-2674.000477 Table of Contents I. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Vision and Mission.......................................................... 1 II. Fiscal Year 2011 Overview................................................................................................................. 3 DHS Total Budget Authority by Funding: Fiscal Years 2009–2011............................................... 13 FY 2011 Percent of Total Budget Authority by Organization .......................................................... 15 Total Budget Authority by Organization: Fiscal Years 2009–2011................................................. 17 III. Efficiency Review & Progress ……………………………………………………………………. 19 IV. Accomplishments …………………………………………………………………………………..21 V. Summary Information by Organization ............................................................................................ 29 Departmental Management and Operations ....................................................................................
  • ISCRAM2005 Conference Proceedings Format

    ISCRAM2005 Conference Proceedings Format

    Benson et al. Adaptive Development for Crisis Response Management Systems Adaptive Development of a Common Operating Environment for Crisis Response and Management Alena L. Benson Keith Biggers University of Washington Texas A&M University [email protected] [email protected] Jim Wall Mark P. Haselkorn Texas A&M University University of Washington [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Complex information and communication systems present a special challenge to system designers because these are generally deployed as large, distributed systems with diverse user groups. Crisis response and management organizations in particular expect systems to be interoperable, resilient, flexible and provide lasting benefit. Currently, systems such as Virtual USA (Department of Homeland Security) and WatchKeeper (United States Coast Guard) seek to create common situational awareness for all participating agencies in security and incident response operations. We propose adaptive development as a system development model to build upon the ideas of systems such as Virtual USA and WatchKeeper in order to create sustainable and adaptable systems. Adaptive development supports ongoing improvement through user-driven design and modification in the target environment. An internet-based dashboard demonstrated during a United States Coast Guard Sector Seattle incident response exercise serves as an emergent case study for the adaptive model. Keywords Common Operating Environment, Situational Awareness, Collaborative Decision Making, Service-Oriented Architecture, Precision Information Environments, System Development. INTRODUCTION Information and communication systems have become indispensable to government and non-government crisis response and management (CRM) organizations. Unambiguous and timely sharing of information have become key areas for improvement for CRM (Harrald & Jefferson, 2007). In particular, CRM organizations hope to create a common operating environment (COE) to aid multiple agencies and units in situational awareness and collaborative decision making.
  • Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, & Territorial Partners

    Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, & Territorial Partners

    Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, & Territorial Partners National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) Office of Infrastructure Protection (IP) Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) October 2015 Homeland Security This product was developed in coordination with the Joint Program Office for Countering Improvised Explosive Devices (JPO C-IEDs). Introduction The Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial (SLTT) Partners list explosives and IED-related Federal resources of value to SLTT partners. The Catalog was developed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) in collaboration with Federal interagency partners through the Joint Program Office for Countering Improvised Explosive Devices (JPO C-IED). The JPO C-IED is responsible for coordinating the implementation of the recently updated U.S. Policy for Countering IEDs. The resources in this Catalog support goals and capabilities outlined in the revised policy and are intended to enhance the effectiveness of U.S. counter-IED efforts, including: • Enhancing the ability to deter, detect, and prevent IEDs before threats become imminent. • Ensuring that protection and response efforts effectively neutralize or mitigate the consequences of attacks that do occur. • Leveraging and integrating a “whole-of-government” approach across law enforcement, diplomatic, homeland security, and military disciplines. • Promoting and enhancing information sharing and cooperation between all levels of the Federal government and SLTT partners. The Catalog identifies training and education resources that are provided directly by the Federal Government or are federally sponsored but delivered by a partner organization, such as the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium.
  • 4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System

    4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System

    4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System Mission Critical Protection for EOD Operators npaerospace.com 4030 ELITE Core Benefits Mission Critical EOD Protection ADVANCED OPTICAL PERFORMANCE Advanced ergonomic helmet design offers high protection The 4030 ELITE is the next generation Bomb Disposal Suit and Helmet and a wide field of view, with an active demisting visor System from NP Aerospace, a global leader in ballistic protection and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) design and manufacturing. The high performance, user configurable suit offers 360° protection from the four main EMERGENCY REMOVAL & EXTRACTION aspects of an explosion: fragmentation, overpressure, blast wind and heat radiation. Patented two pull quick release system in jacket and trousers Developed in response to customer feedback and using the latest technology, it is certified enables removal in less than 30 seconds and a new drag to the NIJ 0117.01 Public Safety Bomb Suit Standard by the Safety Equipment Institute. rescue feature allows for rapid emergency extraction The 4030 ELITE delivers improved survivability and ergonomics and accelerated donning and doffing. Protection is enhanced across critical areas such as the neck and torso providing an optimum performance to weight ratio. OPTIMUM SURVIVABILITY AT A LOW WEIGHT High protection across critical areas such as The highly adaptable suit allows for optional customisation with mix and match jacket the torso and neck ensures blast forces are and trouser sizing options and interoperability with the latest user communications deflected and fragments are absorbed and electronics, eliminating the need for a full scale technology upgrade. The 4030 ELITE is the latest addition to the NP Aerospace Bomb Disposal Suit portfolio which is proven and trusted by thousands of EOD operators worldwide.
  • Virtual USA Brochure

    Virtual USA Brochure

    TM Virtual USA In April 2010, the largest accidental marine oil spill in U.S. history struck the U.S. Gulf Coast, releasing 53,000 barrels of oil a day into the Gulf of Mexico. The oil traveled hundreds of miles into estuaries and onto beaches, impacting multiple states along the Gulf Coast – requiring a coordinated response among neighboring states, as well as Federal and private sector partners. Emergency management agencies were initially able to exchange only static information via email, but quickly realized that a more efficient response would require the ability to actively share real-time information. To meet this need, several Gulf States called upon the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) for early activation of the Virtual USA (vUSA) information-sharing prototype solution, which was under development at the time. As a result of the vUSA Prototype’s deployment, the Florida Civil Air Patrol was able to share real-time information on oil sightings Through Virtual USA, Virtual Louisiana shares data with state, with the Florida Emergency Operations Center and the Unified Federal, and private partners in other jurisdictions for use in response Command in Mobile, Alabama — enabling both states to deploy to the Deep Horizon oil spill. response teams to specific locations, saving time and money, and maximizing the effectiveness of the cleanup effort. Similarly, in Louisiana, information gathered during flights over the Gulf Coast and shared with partners through vUSA allowed agencies to better target operational response and cleanup teams. vUSA further improved coordination with the private sector during oil spill response efforts.
  • Handbook on the Management of Munitions Response Actions

    Handbook on the Management of Munitions Response Actions

    United States Office of Solid Waste and EPA 505-B-01-001 Environmental Protection Emergency Response May 2005 Agency Washington, DC 20460 EPA Handbook on the Management of Munitions Response Actions Interim Final 000735 EPA Handbook on The Management of Munitions Response Actions INTERIM FINAL May 2005 000736 This page intentionally left blank. 000737 Disclaimer This handbook provides guidance to EPA staff. The document does not substitute for EPA’s statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances. This handbook is an Interim Final document and allows for future revisions as applicable. 000738 This page intentionally left blank. 000739 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS ..................................................... xiii ACRONYMS ...............................................................xxv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview...................................................... 1-1 1.2 The Common Nomenclature ....................................... 1-2 1.3 Organization of This Handbook .................................... 1-5 2.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ........................................... 2-1 2.1 Regulatory Overview............................................. 2-2 2.1.1 Defense Environmental Restoration Program .................... 2-2 2.1.2 CERCLA ...............................................
  • The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations

    The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations

    The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by Daniel Duffty, Class of 2010 __________________________ Audra Sosny, Class of 2010 __________________________ Date: May 5, 2009 Approved: Professor David Brown, IQP Advisor Abstract The project focused on the current and predicted impact of robots on surveillance, reconnaissance, automated defense, and bomb disposal operations. It investigated existing products and technologies to create a representation of society’s present opinions. The project considered technological, legal, and ethical concerns affecting the advancement of military robotics. It anticipates future developments by analyzing opinions from interviews and data from a survey. The project concluded that society endorses the evolution of robotics not involving lethal force that benefits the military. ii Executive Summary This project, entitled The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations, studies the current and predicted impact of robots on surveillance, reconnaissance, automated defense, and bomb disposal operations. The project group, Daniel Duffty and Audra Sosny, investigated what robotic technologies are available, how the military presently uses robots, what society thinks about military robots, and what the future of military robots may hold. The use of robotics throughout all facets of society is rapidly increasing. As an emerging field with few developmental restrictions, society’s reaction to and support of robotics varies greatly. The problem is that society supports the military using robots for some purposes, but not all. Another problem is that society supports robots with certain capabilities, but not all.
  • Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011

    Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011

    S. HRG. 111–811 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 3607 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME- LAND SECURITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 54–971 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio JACK REED, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BEN NELSON, Nebraska MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JON TESTER, Montana ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania CHARLES J. HOUY, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C.
  • Unexploded Ordnance

    Unexploded Ordnance

    Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Threat & Risk Assessment Meeting the requirements of CIRIA C681 ‘Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) A guide for the Construction Industry’ Risk Management Framework PROJECT NUMBER P7462 ORIGINATOR L. Gregory VERSION NUMBER 1.0 REVIEWED BY B. Wilkinson (18th July 2019) CLIENT Campbell Reith RELEASED BY R. Griffiths (23rd July 2019) SITE Harrow (Northwick Park, HA1 3GX) RATING VERY HIGH - This Site requires further action to reduce risk to ALARP during intrusive activities. 6 Alpha Associates Limited, Unit 2A Woolpit Business Park, Bury St Edmunds, IP30 9UP, United Kingdom T: +44 (0)2033 713 900 | W: www.6alpha.com Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 5 STAGE ONE – SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 6 Proposed Works ............................................................................................................................. 6 Ground Conditions ........................................................................................................................
  • Circling the Wagons

    Circling the Wagons

    Interoperability & Emergency Communications News Clips February 20, 2009 – March 6, 2009 FEMA Seeks Public Comment on EAS Proposal........................................................................... 2 North Carolina and Virginia Law Enforcement Agencies Connect Via Internet Protocol-Based Solution ........................................................................................................................................... 2 First Responder IPT, Interoperability and Preparedness Dominate DHS S&T Stakeholders Conference ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Public safety, CTIA ask FCC for relief in 700 MHz band ............................................................. 8 Interoperability, change orders slow rebanding efforts .................................................................. 9 Officials eye a geospatial 'Virtual USA' ....................................................................................... 11 DHS Chief Urges ‘Fresh Look’ at Interoperable Communications .............................................. 12 News and Notes from the Napolitano Hearing ............................................................................. 13 NLC Offers Emergency Management Training to Local Officials .............................................. 17 San Antonio invests in cross-agency, data-sharing system .......................................................... 18 High tech, high pricetag technology supports
  • TR-114 Fire Department Response to Biological Threat at B'nai B'rith

    TR-114 Fire Department Response to Biological Threat at B'nai B'rith

    U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series Fire Department Response to Biological Threat at B’nai B’rith Headquarters Washington, DC USFA-TR-114/April 1997 U.S. Fire Administration Fire Investigations Program he U.S. Fire Administration develops reports on selected major fires throughout the country. The fires usually involve multiple deaths or a large loss of property. But the primary criterion T for deciding to do a report is whether it will result in significant “lessons learned.” In some cases these lessons bring to light new knowledge about fire--the effect of building construction or contents, human behavior in fire, etc. In other cases, the lessons are not new but are serious enough to highlight once again, with yet another fire tragedy report. In some cases, special reports are devel- oped to discuss events, drills, or new technologies which are of interest to the fire service. The reports are sent to fire magazines and are distributed at National and Regional fire meetings. The International Association of Fire Chiefs assists the USFA in disseminating the findings throughout the fire service. On a continuing basis the reports are available on request from the USFA; announce- ments of their availability are published widely in fire journals and newsletters. This body of work provides detailed information on the nature of the fire problem for policymakers who must decide on allocations of resources between fire and other pressing problems, and within the fire service to improve codes and code enforcement, training, public fire education, building technology, and other related areas. The Fire Administration, which has no regulatory authority, sends an experienced fire investigator into a community after a major incident only after having conferred with the local fire authorities to insure that the assistance and presence of the USFA would be supportive and would in no way interfere with any review of the incident they are themselves conducting.
  • ESS2010 SAR Emergency Services

    ESS2010 SAR Emergency Services

    2010 Sector Annual Report: Emergency Services Sector This page intentionally blank ii June 2010 2010 Sector Annual Report: Emergency Services Sector 2010 Sector CIKR Protection Annual Report for the Emergency Services Sector Released by: Kory Whalen Chief, Emergency Services Sector-Specific Agency June 2010 iii 2010 Sector Annual Report: Emergency Services Sector iv June 2010 2010 Sector Annual Report: Emergency Services Sector This page intentionally blank June 2010 v 2010 Sector Annual Report: Emergency Services Sector Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Section 2: Sector Risk Considerations ..................................................................................... 7 2.1 Biological Risks ........................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Cyber Risks .................................................................................................................. 7 Section 3: Sector Goals and Objectives ................................................................................... 9 3.1 ESS Vision Statement .................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Sector Goals ................................................................................................................