DOCSLIB.ORG

9789955195825.Pdf (1.050Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9789955195825.Pdf (1.050Mb) Tarptautinė mokslinė konferencija TARMĖS – EUROPOS TAUTŲ KULTŪROS PAVELDAS Išplėstinės tezės International Scientific Conference DIALECTS – EUROPEAN NATIONAL HERITAGE Extended Abstracts Vilnius 2013 TARMĖS – EUROPOS TAUTŲ KULTŪROS PAVELDAS 2013 m. rugsėjo 26–27 d. Konferencijos mokslinis komitetas Komiteto pirmininkė: prof. dr. Zofija Babickienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva Nariai: prof. dr. Gintautas Akelaitis, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva prof. dr. Alvydas Butkus, Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, Lietuva prof. habil. dr. Genovaitė Kačiuškienė, Šiaulių universitetas, Lietuva; Matėjaus Belo universitetas, Slovakija prof. dr. Lidija Leikuma, Latvijos universitetas, Latvija doc. dr. Žaneta Markevičienė, Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas, Lietuva doc. dr. Regina Rinkauskienė, Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas, Lietuva doc. dr. Lora Tamošiūnienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva prof. habil. dr. Anna Tyrpa, Lenkijos mokslų akademija, Lenkija dr. Aurelija Gritėnienė, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Lietuva Konferencijos organizacinis komitetas Komiteto pirmininkė: dr. Ilona Čiužauskaitė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva Nariai: doc. dr. Rima Bakšienė, Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Lietuva Silvija Masalskienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva Viktorija Mažeikienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva doc. dr. Lina Murinienė, Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas, Lietuva dr. Živilė Nedzinskaitė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva Laima Pečkuvienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva Diana Steiblienė, Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas, Lietuva dr. Jolita Urbanavičienė, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Lietuva Kristina Gecevičiūtė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Lietuva Leidinį parengė: prof. dr. Gintautas Akelaitis, Mykolo Romerio universitetas prof. dr. Zofija Babickienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas Viktorija Mažeikienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas Laima Pečkuvienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas Visos knygos leidybos teisės saugomos. Ši knyga arba kuri nors jos dalis negali būti dauginama, taisoma arba kitu būdu platinama be leidėjo sutikimo. ISBN 978-9955-19-582-5 (elektroninė versija) © Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2013 TARPTAUTINĖ MOKSLINĖ KONFERENCIJA | 2 TARMĖS – EUROPOS TAUTŲ KULTŪROS PAVELDAS 2013 m. rugsėjo 26–27 d. Turinys Gintautas Akelaitis, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva PARENTEZĖ LIETUVIŲ KALBOS TARMĖSE / PARENTHESIS IN THE LITHUANIAN DIALECTS ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Zofija Babickienė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva ŠIAURĖS ŽEMAIČIŲ KRETINGIŠKIŲ TARMĖS LEKSIKOS SAVITUMAS / VOCABULARY PECULARITIES IN THE NORTH-ŽEMAITIAN DIALECT OF KRETINGA .......................... 10 Rima Bakšienė, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Vilnius, Lietuva VAKARŲ AUKŠTAIČIŲ KAUNIŠKIŲ PRIEGAIDŽIŲ AUDICINIAI TYRIMAI: REZULTATAI IR PROBLEMOS / AUDITIVE STUDIES OF SYLLABLE ACCENTS OF WEST AUKŠTAITIAN KAUNAS REGION RESIDENTS: RESULTS AND PROBLEMS ....... 11 Bożena Cząstka-Szymon, Mokytojų rengimo kolegija, Belsko-Biala, Lenkija TRADYCYJNE PODZIALY DIALEKTALNE A USTAWY UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ .................. 13 Kazimieras Garšva, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Vilnius, Lietuva LATVIJOS LIETUVIŲ ŠNEKTOS / LITHUANIAN DIALECTS OF LATVIA.......................... 14 Kinga Geben, Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva STOSUNEK LITEWSKICH POLAKOW DO DYGLOSJI (BADANIE SOCJOLINGWISTYCZNE) / LITHUANIAN POLES’ ATTITUDES TOWARD DIGLOSSIA (SOCIOLINGUISTIC INVESTIGATION) .................................................................................. 16 Aurelija Gritėnienė, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Vilnius, Lietuva KIAULĖ, ARKLYS IR OŽKA LIAUDIŠKUOSE SUDURTINIUOSE AUGALŲ VARDUOSE / CONSTITUENTS KIAULĖ ‘PIG’, ARKLYS ‘HORSE’, AND OŽKA ‘GOAT’ IN FOLK COMPOUND NAMES OF PLANTS .......................................................................................... 18 Dalia Gulbinskienė, Rūta Navickaitė, Lithuanian University of Education, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania LEARNING CULTURES: INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF EFL STUDENTS AT MRU AND LUES ............................................................................................. 20 Birutė Jasiūnaitė, Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva KAI KURIE VELNIO PAVADINIMAI PAGAL IŠVAIZDĄ TARMĖSE IR TAUTOSAKOJE / SOME APPEARANCE-RELATED NAMES OF THE DEVIL IN DIALECTS AND FOLKLORE................................................................................................................................21 Genovaitė Kačiuškienė, Šiaulių universitetas, Šiauliai, Lietuva, UMB, Slovakija ŠIAURĖS PANEVĖŽIŠKIŲ TARMINĖS NUOSTATOS: SOCIOLINGVISTINIS TYRIMAS / LINGUISTIC SELF-AWARENESS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE NORTH PANEVĖŽYS DIALECT ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Audronė Kairienė, Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva SENOSIOS GRAIKŲ KALBOS DIALEKTAI ARISTOFANO KOMEDIJOSE / ANCIENT GREEK DIALECTS IN THE COMEDIES OF ARISTOPHANES ........................................... 24 TARPTAUTINĖ MOKSLINĖ KONFERENCIJA | 3 TARMĖS – EUROPOS TAUTŲ KULTŪROS PAVELDAS 2013 m. rugsėjo 26–27 d. Laima Kalėdienė, Lietuvių kalbos institutas, Vilnius, Lietuva VILNIAUS MIESTO KALBA: STEBIMOJO LAIKO HIPOTEZĖ / VILNIUS URBAN DIALECT: THE APPARENT-TIME HYPOTHESIS ................................................................. 25 Regina Kliukienė, Vilniaus universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva TARMĖS ŽEMAITIJOS REGIONO MIESTUOSE (VARTOJIMAS IR KALBINĖS NUOSTATOS) / DIALECTS IN THE TOWNS OF ŽEMAITJA REGION (USE AND LINGUISTIC ATTITUDES) ........................................................................................................ 27 Валерия Колосова, Lingvistinių tyrimų institutas, Sankt Peterburgas, Rusija ВЗАИМОСВЯЗЬ ДИАЛЕКТНЫХ НАЗВАНИЙ РАСТЕНИЙ И ИХ МОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ПРИЗНАКОВ С ТЕКСТАМИ ЭТИОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЛЕГЕНД, НАРОДНОЙ МЕДИЦИНЫ И МАГИИ (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ СЛАВЯНСКИХ ЯЗЫКОВ) / INTERDEPENDENCE AMONG DIALECTAL PHYTONYMS, THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES, ETIOLOGICAL LEGENDS, FOLK MEDICINE, AND MAGIC (ON SLAVONIC MATERIAL) ................................................................................................................................ 29 Елена Королёва, Daugpilio universitetas, Latvija «ДИАЛЕКТНЫЙ СЛОВАРЬ ОДНОЙ СЕМЬИ-2» – ИСТОЧНИК ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ПОГРАНИЧНЫХ ГОВОРОВ / THE DIALECTAL THESAURUS OF ONE FAMILY – 2 – THE SOURCE OF RESEARCH ON A FRONTIER DIALECT ................................................. 31 Anna Kostecka-Sadowa, Lenkijos mokslų akademijos Lenkų kalbos institutas, Krokuva, Lenkija WPŁYWY WSCHODNIOSŁOWIAŃSKIE W GWARACH POLSKICH – ZARYS PROBLEMATYKI, EAST EUROPEAN INFLUENCES IN POLISH DIALECTS – AN OUTLINE OF ISSUES ................................................................................................................ 33 Joanna Koziol, Lenkijos mokslų akademijos Lenkų kalbos institutas, Krokuva, Lenkija RZECZOWNIKI ILOŚCIOWE W GWARACH POLSKICH. ZARYS PROBLEMATYKI / QUANTITATIVE NOUNS IN POLISH DIALECTS. OUTLINE OF THE TOPIC ................... 35 Ольга Крылова, Институт лингвистических исследований РАН Россия, Санкт-Петербург, Россия ОТРАЖЕНИЕ СЕМАНТИКИ ДИАЛЕКТНОГО СЛОВА В СОВРЕМЕННЫХ РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫХ СЛОВАРЯХ / THE REFLECTION OF THE SEMANTICS OF DIALECT WORDS IN MODERN REGIONAL DICTIONARIES .............................................................. 37 Kristine Kunicka, Daugpilio universitetas, Daugpilis, Latvija ОСОБЕННОСТИ ПОЛЬСКОГО РЕГИОЛЕКТА В ЛАТГАЛИИ: ЛЕКСИЧЕСКИЙ АСПЕКТ / THE PECULIARITIES OF THE POLISH REGIOLECT IN LATGALE: LEXICAL ASPECT ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Елена Кузьмина, Sankt Peterburgo valstybinis universitetas, Rusija УСТАРЕВШАЯ ЛЕКСИКА В РУССКИХ НАРОДНЫХ ГОВОРАХ (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ ПСКОВСКИХ ГОВОРОВ) / OUTDATED LEXICON IN THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL DIALECTS (THE PSKOV DIALECTS) ...................................................................................... 40 TARPTAUTINĖ MOKSLINĖ KONFERENCIJA | 4 TARMĖS – EUROPOS TAUTŲ KULTŪROS PAVELDAS 2013 m. rugsėjo 26–27 d. Lidija Leikuma, Latvijos universitetas, Ryga, Latvija PIRMAIS MONOGRĀFISKAIS APCERĒJUMS PAR LATVIEŠU VALODAS IZLOKSNĒM — A. BECENBERGERA „LETTISCHE DIALECT-STUDIEN“ (1885) / THE FIRST MONOGRAPHIC TREATISE ON THE SUBDIALECTS OF THE LATVIAN LANGUAGE — “LETTISCHE DIALECT-STUDIEN“ BY A. BEZZENBERGER (1885) ................................... 43 Лена Леванцевич, Bresto valstybinis A. S. Puškino universitetas, Brestas, Baltarusija ЛІНГВІСТЫЧНАЯ ГЕАГРАФІЯ БРЭСТЧЫНЫ / .................................................................. 45 Aurimas Markevičius, Lietuvos edukologijos universitetas, Vilnius, Lietuva PRIELINKSNIŲ RAIŠKA IR VARTOJIMAS TARMĖSE / EXPRESSION AND USAGE OF PREPOSITIONS IN LITHUANIAN DIALECTS ........................................................................ 49 Dace Markus, Rygos pedagogikos ir švietimo vadybos akademija, Ryga, Latvija MALĒNIEŠU RUNĀTĀ VARIANTA FONĒTIKA: STABILITĀTE UN MAIŅAS / PHONETICS OF SPOKEN MALENIAN VARIANT: STABILITY AND CHANGES .............. 51 Liene Markus-Narvila, Latvių kalbos institutas, Ryga, Latvija LINGVISTISKĀ SITUĀCIJA RUCAVĀ 21. GS. / LINGUISTIC SITUATION IN RUCAVA IN THE 21ST CENTURY ................................................................................................................ 53 Елена Матейкович, Daugpilio universitetas,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geolinguistic and Sociolinguistic Situation of Northern Samogitians of Kretinga: Dialectal Area, Use of the Dialect, Linguistic Attitudes
    DALIA PAKALNIŠKIENĖ Lietuvių kalbos institutas Fields of research: history of Lithuanian language, Baltic linguistics, geolinguistics. JŪRATĖ LUBIENĖ Klaipėdos universitetas Fields of research: lexicology, dialectology, geolinguistics. GEOLINGUISTIC AND SOCIOLINGUISTIC SITUATION OF NORTHERN SAMOGITIANS OF KRETINGA: DIALECTAL AREA, USE OF THE DIALECT, LINGUISTIC ATTITUDES Šiaurės žemaičiai kretingiškiai geolingvistiniu ir sociolingvistiniu požiūriu: plotas, tarmės vartojimas, kalbinės nuostatos ANNOTATION The aim of this article is to highlight the parameters denoting the vitality level of lin- guistic and cultural identity of one dialectal community (namely, the Northern Samogi- tians of Kretinga) under the circumstances of increasing globalization and diglossia. In accordance with the theoretical concept of geolinguistics as a dynamic dialectology, the do- main classification proposed by Anton M. Hagen and the empirical material issues denoting sociocultural identity of the subdialect are presented. The vitality and sociocultural distinc- tion of the dialectal area is being sustained by various factors, three of which have the most important role: sufficiently developed infrastructure, dialect use and attitudes based on the value system of users of the dialect. Straipsniai / Articles 37 DALIA PAKALNIŠKIENĖ, JŪRATĖ LUBIENĖ KEYWORDS: Samogitian dialect, Northern Samogitians of Kretinga, stan- dard language, geolinguistics, sociolinguistics, domain, linguistic attitude. ANOTACIJA Straipsnyje svarstoma, ar įmanomas vienu dialektu kalbančios
    [Show full text]
  • THE PAST and PRESENT of the SAMOGITIAN LANGUAGE 1. Historical Overview an Essential Question Has Been Repeatedly Raised Since Ol
    The Past and Present of the Samogitian Language JUOZAS PABRĖŽA https://doi.org/10.22364/bf.28.1.05 Baltu filoloģija XXVIII (1) 2019 THE PAST AND PRESENT OF THE SAMOGITIAN LANGUAGE Juozas PABRĖŽA Šiauliai University 1. Historical overview An essential question has been repeatedly raised since olden times: is Samogitian a language or a dialect? Before the appearance of standard Lithu- anian, the concept of the Samogitian language prevailed. Quite a few Samogi- tians wrote their works in Samogitian. The 19th c. boasts a particularly large number of such works. In that period the concern and efforts to create standard Lithuanian on the basis of the Samogitian dialect were particularly obvious. The language and the spelling of Dionizas Poška, Silvestras Valiūnas and Simonas Stanevičaus, all of them originally being South Samogitians, were oriented towards their native Dūnininkai dialect. Three of the most prominent Samogitians of the 19th c. — Jurgis Ambraziejus Pabrėža, Simonas Daukantas and Motiejus Valančius — employed the North Samogitian Dounininkai dialect in their writings. The creator of the standard Samogitian language J. A. Pabrėža wrote: “A Samogitian will never agree about the language either with a Lithuanian, a Prussian or a Latvian.” (Subačius 1996: 54) Juozas Čiulda, the author of the most solid grammar of the Samogitian language of the time, written in Polish in 1854 (Trumpi samprotavimai apie žemaičių kalbos gramatikos taisykles — “Brief Reasoning about the Rules of the Samogitian Language”) consistently used the concept of the Samogitian language, and at the end of his book affirms this by stating the following: “These are my speculations about the Samogitian language.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Dialectology Profiles: Problems and Findings”, Aims to Demonstrate a Wide Range of Studies Within Lithuanian Dialectology
    3 Approved for publishing by the Scientific Council of the Institute of the Lithuanian Language Decree Protocol No. MT-50, dated 30 December 2020 Editorial Board: Danguolė Mikulėnienė (Editor-in-Chief) Lietuvių kalbos institutas Ana Stafecka LU Latviešu valodas institūts Miroslaw Jankowiak Akademie věd České republiky Edmundas Trumpa Latvijas universitāte Ilja Lemeškin Univerzita Karlova Special issue editor Violeta Meiliūnaitė Reviewers: Dalia Pakalniškienė Klaipėdos universitetas Liene Markus–Narvila Latvijas universitāte The bibliographic information about this publication is available in the National Bibliographic Data Bank (NBDB) of the Martynas Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania ISBN 978-609-411-279-9 DOI doi.org/10.35321/e-pub.8.problems-and-findings © Institute of the Lithuanian Language, 2020 © Violeta Meiliūnaitė, compilation, 2020 © Contributing authors, 2020 Contents PREFACE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 DANGUOLĖ MIKULĖNIENĖ ISSUES OF PERIODIZATION: DIALECTOLOGICAL THOUGHT, METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND IDEOLOGICAL TURNS ------------------------------------ 8 VIOLETA MEILIŪNAITĖ. STABILITY AND DYNAMICS OF (LITHUANIAN) DIALECTAL NETWORK 38 JURGITA JAROSLAVIENĖ.METHODOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND COMPLEXITY IN COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL SOUND RESEARCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 50 RIMA BAKŠIENĖ.INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INTO THE QUALITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VOCALISM VARIANTS IN THE SUBDIALECT OF ŠAKIAI -----------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Norbert OSTROWSKI “NATURAL COORDINATION”
    BALTISTICA LII(1) 2017 47–63 doi: 10.15388/Baltistica.52.1.2308 Norbert OSTROWSKI Uniwersytet Jagielloński “NATURAL COORDINATION” AND THE ORIGIN OF THE LITHUANIAN CONJUNCTION beĩ ‘AND’, WITH COMMENTS ON OLD PRUSSIAN–LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE CONTACT Abstract. Productivity of the Lithuanian conjunction beĩ ‘and’, marker of so called “natural coordination”, is strictly connected to the area of Lithuania Minor (former East Prussia). Lithuanian beĩ comes from conflation of the common Baltic conjunc- tion bè ‘and’ and an additive particle ir ‘also’. The conflated form *beir has been further reduced to beĩ in accordance with Lithuanian phonotactic rules that do not tolerate group VRR (V = Vocal, R = Resonant). There are some traces that suggest that Lithuanian beĩ ‘and’ came into existence in the bilingual, Old Prussian-Lithua- nian environment. Keywords: Lithuanian; Old Prussian; historical syntax; etymology; language contacts. The Lithuanian conjunction beĩ ‘and’ is used “in order to combine words with related meanings: Tvas beĩ mótina ‘Father and mother’, Dienà beĩ naktìs ‘Day and night’, Tėvaĩ turjo dù vaikù, snų beĩ dùkterį ‘Parents had two children, son and daughter’”1. These examples reveal beĩ as a marker of so- called “natural coordination”. The structure of the paper is as follows: in section 1, I will present the geographical scope of beĩ. This section will show that productivity of the Lithuanian conjunction beĩ ‘and’ is strictly connected to the area of Lithuania Minor (former East Prussia). Moving eastward, the frequency of beĩ reduces dramatically. This suggests that beĩ ‘and’ in modern Lithuanian is a borrowing from Lithuania Minor dialects. The next section describes how beĩ was used in Old Lithuanian texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Snake Euphemisms in Lithuanian: Names Based on Appearance, Habitat, and Behaviour
    Etnolingwistyka 29 Lublin 2017 I. Rozprawy i analizy DOI: 10.17951/et.2017.29.191 Marius S m e t o n a (Vilnius University) Some aspects of snake euphemisms in Lithuanian: names based on appearance, habitat, and behaviour One of the aspects of linguistic worldview are taboos and the ways they make their way into daily usage. In one kind of taboo, a word is endowed with a magical function, which leads to the emergence of euphemisms. These euphemisms are used to replace dangerous words that can call forth disasters or spirits, and enable the speaker to interact with others without the fear of breaking the taboo. The goal of this article is to analyse the euphemisms for the snake in the Lithuanian language. The analysis is based on a semantic classification of euphemisms. The data come from various dictionaries and texts of folklore. Euphemism for the snake constitute the largest group of animal euphemisms in Lithuanian and only a selected sample of them are addressed here. The ancient cult of the snake in Lithuania was abolished with the advent of Christianity and then a negative attitude to snakes was imposed. A possible classification of snake euphemisms would thus be to distinguish those that originated before Christianity and those that did after it had been introduced. Key words: euphemisms; semantic classification; snakes; taboo; worldview; Christianity Ethnolinguistics is usually defined as a field of linguistics concerned with the relationship between language and culture, and of course different authors or schools understand that relationship differently (Gudavičius 2009: 9). Besides, one must not forget about the individual aspect of language: a person’s speech is partly defined by his or her nationality, as every nation has its own deep-rooted worldview that embraces its value system – this worldview is reflected in the language of each individual (Bartmiński 2009: 25).
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Language in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania: Between Function and Status
    Belarusian Political Science Review, Volume 2, 2012–2013 ISSN 2029-8684 (online) ISSN 2029-8676 INSTITUTIONS AND COMMUNITIES: HISTORICAL DIMENSION Alieh Dziarnovič LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE IN THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA: BETWEEN FUNCTION AND STATUS Introduction, or the Incident of 1529 At the very beginning of May 1529, on behalf of the High Court – “by or- der of His Majesty” – offi cials of the central and regional (Vilnius/Wilno/Viĺnia Voivodeship) administration of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania sent decki1 Vasiĺ Bialianin to the Eišiškės parish of Lida County (today in the Šalčininkai district of Vilnius County of the Republic of Lithuania). He was to interview witnesses on the spot over a disputed property case between a boyar of His Majesty Piotr Sumarok and Eišiškės subject Sieńka Ivaškavič. The judicial body, headed by the Marshal2 of His Majesty Maciej Vojciechavič Kločka, “ordered Sumarok and Sieńka Ivaškavič not to go to those witnesses beforehand, but join the decki”. Sumarok asked permission not to join the decki, but to stay in Vilnius. What a surprise it was for the decki when he met Sumarok on the road to Eišiškės “al- ready going back from witnesses”. The court offi cial asked the plaintiff : «“Sumarok, where are the witnesses?”, – and he pointed out the witnesses in a birchwood. Then, when the witnesses stood in front of me and wanted to confess, Sumarok started talking to them in Lithuanian (emphasis mine. – A.Dz.) and asked them: “For God’s sake do not betray me, and what I promised I will give you, and will not betray you”».
    [Show full text]
  • Vakarų Žemaičių Tarmės Ypatybės
    ŽEMAIČIŲ FOLKLORO TYRIMAI ISSN 1392–2831 Tautosakos darbai XXXIV 2007 VAKARŲ ŽEMAIČIŲ TARMĖS YPATYBĖS JONAS BUKANTIS Klaipėdos universitetas S t r a i p s n i o o b j e k t a s – vakarų žemaičių tarmės padėtis XX a. pabaigoje. Ap- tariama lingvistinė Klaipėdos krašto situacija, pateiktos ryškiausios fonetikos, morfo- logijos ir leksikos ypatybės, skiriančios vakarų žemaičius nuo kitų žemaičių. Nurodo- mos atskirų vakarų žemaičių šnektų ypatybės, bandoma nustatyti tų šnektų atsiradimo priežastis. Analizuojami Klaipėdos krašto asmenvardžiai. D a r b o t i k s l a s – aprašyti vakarų žemaičių tarmės padėtį XX a. pabaigoje. Dar- bui panaudota 1980–2005 m. Klaipėdos universiteto studentų ir straipsnio autoriaus iš vakarų žemaičių tarmės ploto surinkta ir autoriaus iššifruota tarminė medžiaga, taip pat 1941 m. sudaryto Klaipėdos apskrities gyventojų sąrašo duomenys. Vakarų žemaičių tarmė yra bene sparčiausiai nykstanti iš visų tarmių, todėl išlikusių jos faktų užfiksavimas yra labai svarbus. Transkripcijai naudoti lietuvių dialektologijoje įprasti ženklai. Žod ž ia i r a k t a i: vakarų žemaičiai, fonetinės ypatybės, tarmės leksika, asmen- vardžiai. Vardai Vakarų žemaičių1 pavadinimas yra kalbininkų sugalvotas sudarant naują- ją tarmių klasifikaciją, nes šios teritorijos lietuvių kalba neabejotinai priklauso žemaičių tarmei. Bet žemaitiškai kalbantys Klapėdos krašto gyventojai savęs žemaičiais nelaiko, netgi įsižeidžia, jeigu juos kas nors žemaičiais pavadina. Taip yra ir dėl to, kad Klaipėdos kraštas nepriklausė Žemačių kunigaikštystei, ir dėl to, kad juos nuo žemaičių daug metų skyrė administracinė, ekonominė, kultūros ir tikybos ribos. Klaipėdos krašte geriau nei Didžiojoje Lietuvoje buvo išvystyta pramonė bei transportas, anksčiau įvestas privalomas mokymas, lei- džiama daugiau spaudos leidinių, vyravo evangelikų tikyba.
    [Show full text]
  • VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Vilma Mikašytė RENAISSANCE
    VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF THE LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE Vilma Mikašytė RENAISSANCE OF THE SAMOGITIAN DIALECT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ITS SPEAKERS’ (IN)AUTHENTIC IDENTITIES Master of Arts Thesis Joint study programme “Sociolinguistics and Multilingualism”, state code in Lithuania 628Q10001 Study area of Linguistics Supervisor Prof. Dr. Jūratė Ruzaitė ________ _________ (signature) (date) Approved by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rūta Eidukevičienė ________ ______ (signature) (date) Kaunas, 2016 SUMMARY This master’s thesis discusses some indicators of the Samogitian Renaissance and analyzes the elements of the Samogitian identity as the former and the latter are portrayed on various Samogitian groups on Facebook. It reveals how a variety of modes enables portraying how Samogitians perceive what makes up a Samogitian identity. Moreover, since the dialect speakers in focus are a cybercommunity that participates in the Samogitian cultural movement which emerged bottom-up, their behavior as a cybercommunity is observed and examined as well. In addition, the content analysis also explains how Aukštaitians perceive Samogitiannnes, Samogitians, and their dialect. The objectives of the study are met by employing several approaches, including Language Maintenance, Cybercultures, the Theory of Commodification, and the Theory of Multimodality. The survey of the domains where the Samogitian dialect is present suggests that the interest in the dialect and its perceived value is gradually increasing. Furthermore, Samogitians actively participate in various discussions about different Samogitian (and other) topics. As the results show, the most essential element in the Samogitian identity and the unifying (as well as dividing) factor is the dialect. There is a tendency that Samogitians express considerably conservative views about the purity of their dialect.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Language Ideology and Its Influence on Lithuanian Migrants
    ISSN 2335-2019 (Print), ISSN 2335-2027 (Online) Darnioji daugiakalbystė | Sustainable Multilingualism | 11/2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sm-2017-0011 Indrė Nugaraitė Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania STANDARD LANGUAGE IDEOLOGY AND ITS INFLUENCE ON LITHUANIAN MIGRANTS. SAMOGITIANS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS THEIR LANGUAGE VARIETY Summary. The study tries to bridge the gap between research on how the Lithuanian language and its varieties are spoken and maintained by migrants and on how the standard language ideology affects the speakers of regional varieties in Lithuania. The paper investigates Lithuanian Samogitian migrants’ attitudes towards their regional variety, the main factors that might influence their beliefs and whether the standard language ideology is one of these factors. The in-depth analysis of 10 audio-recorded and coded interview responses has shown that in migration, similarly as in Lithuania, people’s attitudes towards Samogitian and the usage of it are governed by the three main factors, namely education, Soviet language policy and the linguistic pressure from society. Even though migrants do not feel intense pressure to speak the “right” language and feel much freer to use the variety of their choice when talking to other migrants, they still believe that it is common sense to use the standard in official gatherings, for public speeches or for official events. Keywords: linguistic attitudes; language ideology; dialect; migration. Introduction The standard Lithuanian language ideology almost undoubtedly affects speakers’ attitudes towards regional varieties in Lithuania. As current studies suggest, even though consciously people express positive attitudes towards their own or other regional varieties, the subconscious attitudes show significantly worse social value of dialects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Samogitianness in the Northern Samogitian Dialect Žemaitiskuma Koncepts Ziemeļu Žemaišu Dialektā
    https://doi.org/10.22364/vnf.11.03 The concept of Samogitianness in the Northern Samogitian dialect Žemaitiskuma koncepts ziemeļu žemaišu dialektā Gintarė Judžentytė-Šinkūnienė, Saulė Nikartaitė Institute of Applied Linguistics Faculty of Philology, Vilnius University Universiteto St. 5, LT-01513, Vilnius, Lithuania E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] This paper explores semantics and cognitive meaning of concept of Samogitianness in Northern Samogitian dialect. The analysis verifies whether the meaning depends on the distribution within the territory (Samogitia and Aukštaitija), as well. The data for the research was collected by filling in the questionnaires and by recording audio material: Northern Samogitians were surveyed verbally and in written form (the ones who were surveyed verbally were speaking Samogitian, some questionnaires were also filled in Samogitian). The people representing other dialects were surveyed online on www.manoapklausa.lt. The interviewees were asked to answer the given questions without additional thinking. Three separate tables (key signs of Samogitianness for Samogitians; key signs of Samogitianness for non-Samogitians and common one (i. e., cognitive meaning of Samogitian in Lithuanian)) were completed to represent researched data. Cognitive meanings were compared, and actual differences were explained. The main aim of the paper is to reveal the cognitive meanings assigned to the concept of Samogitianness of Northern Samogitians, and representatives of other dialects, and to determine the prototype features of the concept of Samogitian. Keywords: cognitive semantics; cognitive meaning; attribute; prototype; concept of Samogitianness. 1. Introduction Although issues of the history and present of Samogitian self-consciousness and identity have lately received increasing attention (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Name Policy: from Theory to Practice
    Dysertacje Wydziału Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu 4 Justyna B. Walkowiak Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu Poznań 2016 Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Dysertacje Wydziału Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu 4 Justyna B. Walkowiak Personal Name Policy: From Theory to Practice Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu Poznań 2016 Projekt okładki: Justyna B. Walkowiak Fotografia na okładce: © http://www.epaveldas.lt Recenzja: dr hab. Witold Maciejewski, prof. Uniwersytetu Humanistycznospołecznego SWPS Copyright by: Justyna B. Walkowiak Wydanie I, Poznań 2016 ISBN 978-83-946017-2-0 *DOI: 10.14746/9788394601720* Wydanie: Wydział Neofilologii UAM w Poznaniu al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań e-mail: [email protected] www.wn.amu.edu.pl Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................ 9 0. Introduction .............................................................................................. 13 0.1. What this book is about ..................................................................... 13 0.1.1. Policies do not equal law ............................................................ 14 0.1.2. Policies are conscious ................................................................. 16 0.1.3. Policies and society ..................................................................... 17 0.2. Language policy vs. name policy ...................................................... 19 0.2.1. Status planning ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Excursion Guide
    Biodiversity and geodiversity, landscapes, nature resources and present-day management in Lithuania Excursion / meeting – for the Environmental Dept / County Governor in Oslo and Akershus June 2–6, 2009, Western Lithuania EXCURSION GUIDE Biodiversity and geodiversity, landscapes, nature resources and present-day management in Lithuania: Excursion / meeting – for the Environmental Dept / County Governor in Oslo and Akershus, June 2–6, 2009, Western Lithuania: Excursion Guide / Compiled by: A. Damušytė, J. Satkūnas, I. Virbickienė; Editor: J. Satkūnas; Lithuanian Geological Survey. – Vilnius: LGT, 2009. – 24 p.: iliustr. – Bibliogr. str. gale ORGANISERS Environmental Department of County Governor in Oslo and Akershus Lithuanian Geological Survey FIELD SEMINAR COORDINATORS Jonas Satkūnas, Lithuanian Geological Survey <[email protected]> Jon A. Markussen Environmental Dept / County Governor in Oslo and Akershus <[email protected]> GUIDES Aldona Damušytė, Albertas Bitinas, Jonas Satkūnas, Saulius Sidabras, Andrius Almanis This field seminar offers an introduction to the variety of landscapes, the rich geodiversity and its relationship with the cultural history and biodiversity of Western Lithuania, system of protected areas, management of resources and spatial planning issues. THEMES/ TOPICS WILL BE PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED · Geology (protection /planning) · Large carnivores · Forestry: management guidelines, felling area, key habitats, vulnerable species, and as arena of hunting ground · Fresh water biodiversity / fishes in Lithuanian waters, traditional use of freshwater fishes, content of pesticides, heavy metals etc. · Biological diversity- management of protected areas / biotopes · Biotope fragmentation · Mapping GIS, map-info · Planning and building act (Coastal zone protection and management) · Acute pollution · The water framework directive THE VISIT FORMAT Field excursion and meetings with managers of protected areas, specialists on geology forestry, biotope monitoring, land owners.
    [Show full text]