DOCSLIB.ORG

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/Masterarbeit ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved original version of thisMSc diploma Program or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/Renewable). Energy in Central & Eastern Europe Which countries in Central and South Eastern Europe are attractive for Investment in Small Hydro Power Plants? Detailed comparison of the Markets in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic and a general analysis of the markets in Croatia, Serbia, Slovakia, Turkey with a comparing view on Montenegro, Romania and Slovenia A Master Thesis submitted for the degree of “Master of Science” supervised by Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Günter BLÖSCHL Mag. Christian KOPECEK Student ID: 7851489 Vienna, November 2009 Affidavit I, Mag. Christian Kopecek, hereby declare 1. that I am the sole author of the present Master Thesis, "Which countries in Central and South Eastern Europe are attractive for Investment in Small Hydro Power Plants?", 259 pages, bound, and that I have not used any source or tool other than those referenced or any other illicit aid or tool, and 2. that I have not prior to this date submitted this Master Thesis as an examination paper in any form in Austria or abroad. Vienna, November 6th 2009 Date Signature i Abstract The work tries to find attractive markets with future growth for the Small Hydro Power Industry within the CEE/SEE region. The method chosen was to identify countries to be analysed, assume criteria for investment decisions in the Small Hydro Business, collect data, condens and evaluate it. The results show, that mainly because of their well-balanced attractiveness countries like Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia might show a strong growth in this industry in the near future. Markets like Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey could see some substantial growth either because of vast potential or because of investor-friendly environment. The other countries also have their chances but those might go with considerable project risk thus preventing the investors to enter into long term capital-intensive projects. The conclusion is to go into more detail at site, apply own weightings in the evaluation and consider a well-balanced portfolio of high-low risk markets. ii Executive Summary The market for Small Hydro Power Plants in Austria does not offer much growth for the near future and for expansion. New attractive sales regions have to be developed. The Master Thesis tries to identify attractive countries in CEE/SEE for Small Hydro Power Projects for a Company engaged in this industry. The method of approach was to collect, verify and document information available in literature, internet, with government authorities, market players, experts, etc. and to condense and visualize it. The assumption is that markets will develop when certain criteria for investors are fulfilled. Those criteria needed to be identified and compared with the condensed data of each country. A simple rating model was developed and the compliance with the assumed investment criteria was marked with grades for each country. Challenge Indicator Grades on Attractiveness for SHP-Projects Low Mark=more attractive High Mark=less attractive 5,0 4,1 3,8 4,0 3,5 2,5 3,2 3,0 2,5 2,3 1,8 1,8 1,9 2,0 1,0 0,0 BIH BG CR HR SRB SK TR MNE RO SLO Figure 1: Challenge Indicator- Evaluation of Attractiveness for Small Hydro Power Projects Source: Kopecek, C. 2009 The result of the analysis shows that within the intensively analysed “Focus 1” countries the Czech Republic seems to be the most attractive market regarding construction and refurbishment of Small Hydro Power Plants. The reasons are the favourable promotion system, the overall fine investment conditions in the country and - for revamping - the outstanding high number of aged plants. Bulgaria comes second in this group, also because of its attractive promotion system and because of a good balance in all other assumed investment decision criteria. Bosnia and Herzegovina has good Small Hydro site potentials and abundant water availability; iii but this Balkan country is still struggling with post-war recovery and has severe structural and organisational deficiencies sometimes discouraging the investor’s community. “Focus 2” countries are led by Slovakia with a new advantageous Renewable Energy Law, well performing economy and the risk-free EURO as recently introduced currency. Turkey offers an extraordinary high potential for Small Hydro Projects with a very liberal attitude towards hydropower plants. The country has an unusually dynamic economy but needs urgent reforms. Croatia and Serbia are again former Yugoslavian countries struggling with restructuring and are both not easy to deal with for investors. Croatia is an EU-accession candidate with good incentives. Serbia has large hydropower potential but is missing a clear promotion system. Slovenia is the favourite of the “Focus 3” countries with rewarding incentives, outstanding water availability and perfect economic performance within the EURO Zone. Romania has large potential and pro-active approach for new plants with a good promotion system but drifts into unsafe political and economical future. Finally, Montenegro stands out with enormous water availability but presently low developed structures and framework for Renewable Energy Investors. In the end, engagement in Small Hydro Projects will be a question of risk appetite, view on the future chances, ability to finance and already existing portfolio of investors. A good mix of high-low challenge countries seems advisable for further market development of the Company. In order to assist the Company to start a subsequent verification process of the underlying data for the rating, which in some countries are extremely contradictory, relating information is given in the work. This refers to existing plants, pending single and multiple “cascade” projects, license holders, developers as well as tender and privatisation lists. The information contained in this work should also give some basis to set first steps for entering the new markets. Further research will be necessary on the reliability and actuality of the data in the concerned countries. The assumption on investment criteria and its weighting need to be tested and adjusted during further research. Permanent monitoring of the markets is required as some important criteria are subject to change. The availability of funding of capital- intensive projects with long payback periods in high-risk countries needs to be assessed as the bankability is a central precondition for projects to materialize. iv Table of Content Affidavit ................................................................................................................... i Abstract .................................................................................................................. ii Executive Summary .............................................................................................. iii Table of Content .................................................................................................... v List of tables ......................................................................................................... ix List of figures ....................................................................................................... xii Glossary .............................................................................................................. xvi 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................ 6 2.1 General Country Information ................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Political and Economic Situation........................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Political and Economic Outlook ............................................................................ 9 2.1.3 Work Force .........................................................................................................10 2.2 Energy ...................................................................................................................10 2.2.1 Overview Electricity Market .................................................................................12 2.2.2 Electricity Balance ...............................................................................................14 2.2.3 Electricity Demand and Production Outlook .........................................................17 2.3 Renewable Energy ................................................................................................19 2.4 Small Hydro Power ...............................................................................................21 2.4.1 SHP Inventory.....................................................................................................22 2.5 Participants on the SHP-Market ...........................................................................27 2.5.1 Institutions and Authorities ..................................................................................27 2.5.2 Market Players ....................................................................................................28 2.6 Legal Framework
Recommended publications
  • Klecanský Zpravodaj

    Klecanský Zpravodaj

    VYDÁVÁ MĚSTSKÝ ÚŘAD KLECANY KLECANSKÝ ZPRAVODAJ Slet čarodějnic na zahradě MŠ Cena výtisku 7 Kč www.mu–klecany.cz Ročník XXXVIII, Květen 2019 / číslo 5 Klecanský zpravodaj • květen 2019 Jubilanti v KVĚTNU Květa Prokopová Zdena Lomová Antonie Gajdová František Kalvach Stanislav Stanislav Miroslava Bečicová Jana Lavicová Liliana Slánská Květoslava Hrušková Vlastimila Přibylová Jarmila Brožová Petr Novák Miloslav Kříž Eva Herdicsová Miroslav Pitauer Jarmila Bratková Juraj Čorňák Hana Beranová Jaroslav Šerhant Daniel Zemen František Rudolf Adolf Janeček Václav Drábek Pavel Verner Běla Kopřivová Božena Vysušilová Jana Štěpánková Marie Fernandová Ludmila Hladká Marie Gajdošová Marie Hejzlová Anna Pitauerová František Dvořák Jaroslava Marvánková Vladimír Sinke Všem květnovým oslavencům přejeme k jejich životnímu jubileu vše nejlepší, pevné zdraví a dostatek životního elánu! Partneři města Vydává Městský úřad Klecany, Do Klecánek 52, Klecany Redakční rada: Dagmar Horová, Jitka Homoláčová Tisk www.tiskdo1000.cz, e-shop tisku Zpravodaj MK ČR 12699. • IČO: 00240290 • Uzávěrka pro materiály do Zpravodaje je 20. dne každého měsíce. Cena výtisku: Kč. 7,– • číslo 5 / 2019, vychází dne 6. 5. 2019 • e–mail: [email protected], zpravodaj@mu–klecany.cz • telefon: 774 055 495 • www.mu–klecany.cz Obsah publikovaných příspěvků se nemusí vždy shodovat se stanoviskem redakční rady, uveřejněné příspěvky vyjadřují názory a postoje autorů. 1 Z OBSAHU Výpisy z usnesení rady a zastupitelstva města Klecany ....................................... 2 Ukliďme svět,
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.

  • Vodič Kroz Tipove Staništa Bih Prema Direktivi O Staništima EU

    Vodič kroz tipove staništa BiH prema Direktivi o staništima EU Januar 2015 Ova publikacija je rezultat projekta Podrška provođenju Direktive o pticama i Direktive o staništima u Bosni i Hercegovini (2012-2015). Projekt je financirala Švedska, Švedska Agencija za međunarodnu saradnju za razvoj, a upravljala mu je Delegacija Europske unije u Bosni i Hercegovini. Stavovi izraženi u ovoj publikaciji su stavovi autora i nikako se ne mogu smatrati stavovima Evropske unije. Autori: Đorđije Milanović, Jugoslav Brujić, Samir Đug, Edina Muratović i Lada Lukić Bilela Urednik: Peter Skoberne Tehnički urednik: Ivaylo Zafirov Voditelj projektnog tima: Aleksander Golob Članice i članovi Upravnog odbora projekta: Nermina Skejović-Hurić (koordinatorica projekta), Tomislav Lukić, Željka Stojičić, Zineta Mujaković, Adi Habul, Hanka Mušimbegović, Azra Rogović-Grubić, Boris Marković, Semra Buza, Stanko Stančić i Zoran Lukač Dizajn: Bunker www.madeinbunker.com Tisak: Ringeis www.ringeis.ba Izdavač: Prospect C&S s.a.. Rue du Prince Royal 83, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Slobodni ste kopirati, distribuirati i prikazati ovaj rad pod uvjetima da se navodi njegove autore, da se rad ne koristi u komercijalne svrhe i da se ništa ne mijenja, transformira ili nadograđuje bez spominjanja autora. U svakom drugom slučaju traži se pisano odobrenje od strane izdavača. 2 Sadržaj Uvod 8 Pregled evropskih značajnih tipova staništa u Bosni i Hercegovini 11 Slana staništa 16 1110 Plitka pjeskovita morska dna 16 uvijek prekrivena vodom 16 1160 Veliki plitki zalivi i zatoni 18 1240 Stjenovite i kamenite mediteranske 20 obale sa endemičnim vrstama roda 20 Limonium 20 Slatke vode 22 3130 Oligotrofne do mezotrofne stajaćice sa vegetacijom Littorelletea uniflorae i/ili Isoeto-Nanojuncetea 22 3140 Tvrde oligo-mezotrofne vode sa bentoskom vegetacijom Chara sp.
  • Groundwater Bodies at Risk

    Groundwater Bodies at Risk

    Results of initial characterization of the groundwater bodies in Croatian karst Zeljka Brkic Croatian Geological Survey Department for Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Zagreb, Croatia Contractor: Croatian Geological Survey, Department for Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Team leader: dr Zeljka Brkic Co-authors: dr Ranko Biondic (Kupa river basin – karst area, Istria, Hrvatsko Primorje) dr Janislav Kapelj (Una river basin – karst area) dr Ante Pavicic (Lika region, northern and middle Dalmacija) dr Ivan Sliskovic (southern Dalmacija) Other associates: dr Sanja Kapelj dr Josip Terzic dr Tamara Markovic Andrej Stroj { On 23 October 2000, the "Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy" or, in short, the EU Water Framework Directive (or even shorter the WFD) was finally adopted. { The purpose of WFD is to establish a framework for the protection of inland surface waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater (protection of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, reduction in pollution groundwater, protection of territorial and marine waters, sustainable water use, …) { WFD is one of the main documents of the European water policy today, with the main objective of achieving “good status” for all waters within a 15-year period What is the groundwater body ? { “groundwater body” means a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or aquifers { Member States shall identify, within each river basin district: z all bodies of water used for the abstraction of water intended for human consumption providing more than 10 m3 per day as an average or serving more than 50 persons, and z those bodies of water intended for such future use.
  • TAIEX EPPA IED Workshop June 2020 Vienna Report

    TAIEX EPPA IED Workshop June 2020 Vienna Report

    Event Report EPPA Regional Workshop on Flood Protection and River Restoration 22 – 23 September 2020 Live video conference The project implemented by the Consortium of NIRAS (lead) This Project is funded by the European Union and Umweltbundesamt GmbH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 OBJECTIVES OF THE TRAINING AND EXPECTED RESULTS ............................................................................ 1 3 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE WORKSHOP ......................................................................................................... 2 3.1 OPENING REMARKS.............................................................................................................................................. 2 3.2 FINDINGS OF THE 2019 REPORT OF THE FITNESS CHECK EVALUATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE AND THE FLOODS DIRECTIVE ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3.3 OUTCOMES OF THE GAP ANALYSIS AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF IMPLEMENTING EU FLOODS DIRECTIVE (WBIF STUDY SEP 2015) AND OUTCOMES IPA REGIONAL PROJECT ON FLOODS .................................................................................. 3 3.4 “ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH TRANSBOUNDARY FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE WESTERN BALKANS - ALBANIA, KOSOVO*, MONTENEGRO, NORTH MACEDONIA (GIZ PROJECT)
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. T-6807-BIH TECHNICAL ANNEX Public Disclosure Authorized BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EMERGENCYTRANSPORT RECONSTRUCTIONPROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized MARCH 13, 1996 Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Unit of Currency: Bosnia and Herzegovina Dinar (BHD) BHD100.00 = US$0.67 (as of March 8, 1996) US$1.00 = BHD 149.25 (as of March 8, 1996) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic BH - Bosnia and Herzegovina BHMTC - BH Ministry of Foreign Trade and International Communications EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC - European Commission ECA - Europe and Central Asia Regional Office EU - European Union FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FBH - Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FRD - Federal Road Directorate FMTC - Federal Ministry of Transport and Communications FYP - First year Program GDP - Gross Domestic Product ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization IDA - International Development Association IFOR - Implementation Force IMG - International Management Group IRI - International Roughness Index IRR - Internal Rate of Return NBF - Non Bank Financed PID - Project Implementation Directorate PMA - Program Management Advisor RAS - Road Advisory Services RD - Road Directorate RS - Republica Srpska SUS - Start Up Services TFBH - Trust Fund for Bosnia and Herzegovina UN - United Nations UNPROFOR - United Nations Protection Force USAID - United States Agency for International Development VOC - Vehicle Operating
  • Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA “Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, 1/94, 13/97 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - consolidated translation, with amendments indicated - • The Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was adopted by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24, 1994. It was published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendment I to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at the session held on June 24th,1994. It was also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 1, 1994. • Amendments II to XXIV to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed by the Constitutional Assembly of the Federation of BiH, at its 14th session held on June 5th,1996. They were published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. • Amendments XXV and XXVI to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina were passed according to the procedure in Chapter VIII, finalized on May 8th, 1997. They were also published in Slu`bene Novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine n. 13, 1997. PREAMBLE I. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FEDERATION Arts. 1-6 II. HUMAN RIGHTS A. General Arts. 1-7 B. Initial Appointment and Functions of the Ombudsmen Arts. 1-9 III. DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN THE FEDERATION GOVERNMENT AND THE CANTONS Arts.
  • Prostorna Diferencijacija Vrgoračkog Područja Na Temelju Krških Prirodno-Geografskih I Društveno-Geografskih Obilježja

    Prostorna Diferencijacija Vrgoračkog Područja Na Temelju Krških Prirodno-Geografskih I Društveno-Geografskih Obilježja

    PROSTORNA DIFERENCIJACIJA VRGORAČKOG PODRUČJA NA TEMELJU KRŠKIH PRIRODNO-GEOGRAFSKIH I DRUŠTVENO-GEOGRAFSKIH OBILJEŽJA SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF VRGORAC AREA BASED ON THE NATURAL-GEOGRAPHIC AND THE SOCIO-GEOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF KARST BRANIMIR VUKOSAV Odjel za geografiju, Sveučilište u Zadru / Department of Geography, University of Zadar UDK: 551.435.8:911.37(497.5 Vrgorac) 911.3(497.5 Vrgorac) Primljeno / Received: 2006-09-10 Izvorni znanstveni članak Original scientific paper Vrgorački kraj obilježen je kontrastom između visokih brdsko-planinskih područja na sjeverozapadu, te niskih i zaravnjenih krških polja na samom jugoistoku. Na relativno maloj površini koju administrativno obuhvaća, javlja se širok raspon različitih prirodno-geografskih i društveno-geografskih elemenata karakterističnih za krajeve izrazitog krša u vapnencima, te se u tom smislu vrgoračko područje može raščlaniti na nekoliko prostornih cjelina nižeg reda. Specifični prirodno-geografski uvjeti rezultirali su krajobrazima karakterističnoga dinarskog sociogeografskog areala koji su i dandanas tipični za pojedine zone ovoga kraja, te daju važan pečat ovom području unatoč rastućoj modernizaciji i efektima globalizacije koji nezaustavljivo mijenjaju čovjekovu djelatnost i njegov utjecaj na okoliš. Ključne riječi: Vrgorac, krš, prostorna diferencijacija, društveno-geografska obilježja, Hrvatska The area of Vrgorac is defined by a contrast between the high mountainous zones in the southwest and the low karst poljes in the southeastern part of the municipality. It is a relatively
  • Sbiârka Zaâkonuę

    Sbiârka Zaâkonuę

    RocÏnõÂk 2006 SBIÂRKA ZA KONUÊ CÏ ESKA REPUBLIKA CÏ aÂstka 182 RozeslaÂna dne 22. prosince 2006 Cena KcÏ 30,± OBSAH: 561. VyhlaÂsÏ ka o stanovenõÂseznamu aglomeracõÂpro uÂcÏely hodnocenõÂa snizÏovaÂnõ hluku 562. VyhlaÂsÏ ka, kterou se stanovõ zpuÊ sob prÏevedenõ listin do elektronicke podoby, zpuÊ sob naklaÂdaÂnõÂsprÏevedenyÂmi listinami a obligatornõÂelektronicka podoba listin (vyhlaÂsÏka o digitalizaci obchodnõÂho rejstrÏõÂku) Strana 7674 SbõÂrka zaÂkonuÊcÏ. 561 /2006 CÏ aÂstka 182 561 VYHLA SÏ KA ze dne 30. listopadu 2006 o stanovenõÂseznamu aglomeracõÂpro uÂcÏely hodnocenõÂa snizÏovaÂnõÂhluku Ministerstvo pro mõÂstnõÂrozvoj stanovõÂpodle § 81a veÂho zatõÂzÏenõ zÏivotnõÂho prostrÏedõ vcÏetneÏ grafickeÂho zaÂkona cÏ. 258/2000 Sb., o ochraneÏ verÏejneÂho zdravõ znaÂzorneÏnõÂjejich vymezenõÂje uveden v prÏõÂloze k teÂto a o zmeÏneÏneÏkteryÂch souvisejõÂcõÂch zaÂkonuÊ , ve zneÏnõ vyhlaÂsÏce. zaÂkona cÏ. 222/2006 Sb.: §1 §2 Seznam aglomeracõ pro hodnocenõ a snizÏovaÂnõ Tato vyhlaÂsÏka nabyÂvaÂuÂcÏinnosti dnem 1. ledna hluku z hlediska dlouhodobeÂho pruÊmeÏrneÂho hluko- 2007. Ministr: Mgr. GandalovicÏ v. r. CÏ aÂstka 182 SbõÂrka zaÂkonuÊcÏ. 561 /2006 Strana 7675 PrÏõÂloha k vyhlaÂsÏce cÏ. 561/2006 Sb. 1 Aglomerace nad 250 000 obyvatel 1.1 Aglomerace Praha Rozsah: Aglomerace zasahuje na území tČchto mČst a obcí: hlavní mČsto Praha, BoĜanovice, ýernošice, ýestlice, DobĜejovice, Dolní BĜežany, Drahelþice, HoromČĜice, Hostivice, Hovorþovice, Husinec, ChrášĢany, ChýnČ, Jeneþ, Jesenice, Jinoþany, Jirny, Klecany, KnČževes, KvČtnice, Líbeznice, MČšice, Modletice, Nuþice, Nupaky, OĜech, PrĤhonice, Psáry, Roztoky, Rudná, ěíþany, SibĜina, Šestajovice, TuchomČĜice, ÚnČtice, Úvaly, Vestec, Zbuzany, Zdiby, Zlatníky-Hodkovice. Základní údaje o aglomeraci (stav k 1. 3. 2001): rozloha: 772,3 km2 poþet obyvatel: 1 234 005 hustota zalidnČní: 1 598 obyvatel na km2 Výþet zahrnutých katastrálních území: Rozloha Hustota zalidnČní Mčsto, obec Katastrální území Poþet obyvatel (km2) (obyv.
  • Download This Article in PDF Format

    Download This Article in PDF Format

    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2021, 422, 13 Knowledge & © L. Raguž et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2021 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021011 Ecosystems Journal fully supported by Office www.kmae-journal.org français de la biodiversité RESEARCH PAPER First look into the evolutionary history, phylogeographic and population genetic structure of the Danube barbel in Croatia Lucija Raguž1,*, Ivana Buj1, Zoran Marčić1, Vatroslav Veble1, Lucija Ivić1, Davor Zanella1, Sven Horvatić1, Perica Mustafić1, Marko Ćaleta2 and Marija Sabolić3 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, Zagreb 10000, Croatia 2 Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Savska cesta 77, Zagreb 10000, Croatia 3 Institute for Environment and Nature, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development, Radnička cesta 80, Zagreb 10000, Croatia Received: 19 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 Abstract – The Danube barbel, Barbus balcanicus is small rheophilic freshwater fish, belonging to the genus Barbus which includes 23 species native to Europe. In Croatian watercourses, three members of the genus Barbus are found, B. balcanicus, B. barbus and B. plebejus, each occupying a specific ecological niche. This study examined cytochrome b (cyt b), a common genetic marker used to describe the structure and origin of fish populations to perform a phylogenetic reconstruction of the Danube barbel. Two methods of phylogenetic inference were used: maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML), which yielded well supported trees of similar topology. The Median joining network (MJ) was generated and corroborated to show the divergence of three lineages of Barbus balcanicus on the Balkan Peninsula: Croatian, Serbian and Macedonian lineages that separated at the beginning of the Pleistocene.
  • Gastropods in the Basin of the River Fojni^Ka

    Gastropods in the Basin of the River Fojni^Ka

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Ribarstvo 66, 2008, (3), 119 —129 A.^i~i} –Mo~i} et al.: Gastropods in the basin of the river Fojni~ka ISSN 1330 –061X UDK: 594.3(28)(497.6) CODEN RIBAEG Original scientific paper GASTROPODS IN THE BASIN OF THE RIVER FOJNI^KA A. ^i~i} –Mo~i} 1, R. [krijelj 2, S. \ug 2 Summary The first detailed investigation of Gastropods in the basin of river Fojni~ka has been carried out in 2001 –2002. The material has been sam - pled five times during four seasons (October 2001 –September 2002) at 11 sites in the following waterways: the rivers Fojni~ka, Draga~a, @eljeznica, Kre{evka and Lepenica. Measurement of certain physical and chemical parameters (BOD 5, water temperature, pH value, amount of dissolved ox- ygen, saturation with oxygen and one time measurement of concentration of nitrates and phosphates) has been carried out together with collecting of macroinvertebrates of zoobenthos. Since the knowledge of biodiversity of Gastropods in Bosnia and Herzegovina is at the very low level, the main objective of this paper is to give an overview of distribution of Gas- tropods communities in the Fojni~ka river basin. In these investigations, 11 taxa of Gastropods and 1468 individuals have been determined. The Gastropods made 16% of total settlement of macroinvertebrates of zoobenthos. Dominant species at investigated sites was Ancylus fluviatilis , while species Acicula sp. , Saxurinator sp . and Valvata piscinalis were just sporadically recorded.
  • Strategic Environmental Impact Study

    Strategic Environmental Impact Study

    Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Final revised versions that incorporates inputs from consultations with the public and relevant authorities Zagreb, May 2015 IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Strategic Environmental Impact Study Document quality information Authors of SEA Jiří Dusík, Dipl. Engineer - Water Resource Engineering Study Marta Brkić, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Ivan Juratek, B.Sc. Agronomy - Landscape Architect Vjeran Magjarević, B. Sc. Phys. Tomislav Hriberšek, B.Sc. Geology Ines Geci, B.Sc. Geology Mario Pokrivač, B.Sc. Traffic, Occupational Safety Specialist Authors of Ivana Šarić, B.Sc. Biology Appropriate Jelena Fressl, B.Sc. Biology Assessment M.Sc. Konrad Kiš, B.Sc. Forestry Tajana Uzelac Obradović, B.Sc. Biology Project name Ex-ante evaluation and Strategic Environmental Assessment for Interreg IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Croatia–Bosnia and Herzegovina-Montenegro 2014-2020 Document name Strategic Environmental Impact Study Version and Final draft incorporating comments after public consultations (20 May dates 2015) Reference U070_14 Managing Directorate for Managing Cooperation Programmes and Regional authority Development within the Agency for Regional Development Sent to Service for Managing Cooperation Programmes Sent on (date): 20 May 2015 Contact