DOCSLIB.ORG

Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, Wace's Roman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, Wace's Roman THE CORONATION OF ARTHUR AND GUENEVERE IN GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH’S HISTORIA REGUM BRITANNIAE, WACE’S R OMAN DE B RUT, AND LAWMAN’S BRUT 1 CHARLOTTE A.T. WULF Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britanniae, Wace’s Roman de Brut and Lawman’s Brut recount the successes and failures of the early British monarchs, with the reign of King Arthur as the centrepiece of each of these narratives. In these three texts the crowning of Arthur (Geoffrey’s Arturus) and Guenevere (or Ganhumara, as Geoffrey names her) at the plenary court held in Caerleon represents the apex of Arthur’s power and glory. A careful analysis of this scene in the Historia reveals Geoffrey’s political purpose in telling Arthur’s story plus Geoffrey’s subtle skill in his portrayal of Guenevere. A study of the same scene in the Roman de Brut and the Brut reveals shifts in purpose and audience in the portrayals of both setting and character, and raises the question of whether Lawman, at least, regarded this event as a coronation or a crown-wearing. 1 My thanks to Jeanne Krochalis for providing advice and encouragement; the participants at three conferences (including Gregynog 2008) for listening to parts of this article, commenting, and offering suggestions; Stevenson University for supporting my attendance at the conferences; Carol Maxwell, Virginia Polley, and Nanette Tamer at SU for various kinds of assistance; Suzanne Thomas for her advice on medieval Latin; David Carpenter for responding promptly and helpfully to an inquiry asking for information; and to my family. 230 Charlotte A.T. Wulf At the time when Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote his Historia, kings were sometimes crowned more than once. As David Carpenter observes, “Nearly all the Norman and Angevin kings, moreover, enjoyed more than one coronation (or what chroniclers called coronations), quite apart, under the Normans, from more regular festal crown-wearings”.2 The ceremony held at Caerleon described in Geoffrey’s Historia may therefore be intended as a second coronation. Certainly, this passage is longer and includes more detailed descriptions than most of the major events in the Historia, painting a memorable picture of theatrical opulence, and leaving the reader in no doubt that Arthur is the pre- eminent monarch of his time. Was this whole scene the result of Geoffrey’s inventive imagination, or was it, perhaps, based in part on an actual historical coronation or crown-wearing? To address this question, both the history and the nature of the medieval coronation ritual must be examined. W.J. Passingham, while discussing Anglo-Saxon coronations, traces coronation rituals in all Christian countries back to Old Testament accounts of the anointing and crowning of kings, although he notes that a number of pre-Christian customs persisted in British coronation rituals.3 Passingham stresses that the anointing with holy oil was considered the most important part of the ceremony, explaining that – By virtue of the unction received the sovereign became even as a priest. A king anointed became a person set apart from the rest of humanity, a being endowed with authority both spiritual and material.4 Robert Murray, also reviewing early coronation ceremonies,5 points out that the coronation ritual “shares a priestly as well as a military character ... the priestly character predominates in it”, adding that the older name 2 David Carpenter, The Reign of Henry III, London, 1996, 444. 3 W.J. Passingham, A History of the Coronation, London, 1937, 89-91. 4 Ibid., 92. 5 Robert H. Murray, The King’s Crowning, London, 1936, 43-44. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 6-10-2019 The Creation of a King: How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur Marcos Morales II [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Cultural History Commons, Medieval History Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation Morales II, Marcos, "The Creation of a King: How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur" (2019). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 276. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/276 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. The Creation of a King: How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur. By: Marcos Morales II Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor David Doellinger Western Oregon University June 05, 2019 Readers Professor Elizabeth Swedo Professor Bau Hwa Hsieh Copyright © Marcos Morales II Arthur, with a single division in which he had posted six thousand, six hundred, and sixty-six men, charged at the squadron where he knew Mordred was. They hacked a way through with their swords and Arthur continued to advance, inflicting terrible slaughter as he went. It was at this point that the accursed traitor was killed and many thousands of his men with him.1 With the inclusion of this feat between King Arthur and his enemies, Geoffrey of Monmouth shows Arthur as a mighty warrior, one who stops at nothing to defeat his foes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey of Monmouth and the English Past
    Chapter 3 Geoffrey of Monmouth and the English Past Rebecca Thomas Geoffrey does not grant much space to the English in the De gestis Britonum. In one respect, this is unsurprising: Geoffrey’s history extends back to the origins of the Britons in Troy, spending a significant amount of time in pre-Roman Britain, and as such the English enter the narrative rather late in the day. Even after their arrival, however, the English do not appear in the way which we might expect. The traditional narrative of the development of the English kingdoms, pioneered by sources such as Bede’s Ecclesiastical History and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, and accepted and reproduced by many of Geoffrey’s contemporary Anglo-Norman historians, has no place in the DGB. With his strikingly different version of events, Geoffrey certainly cannot be accused of lacking originality in his treatment of English history. The way in which he approached this subject is highly significant not only for our understanding of his attitude toward the English, but also for the composition of the DGB more generally. There was no shortage of contemporary historians writing of the English past, such as Henry of Huntingdon, the first version of whose History of the English, with which Geoffrey was most likely familiar, was completed by 1130. Henry presents us with a conventional account of English history, drawing heavily on Bede and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.1 Hengist and Horsa arrive in Britain in 449, and after recounting their dealings with the Britons, Henry pro- ceeds through the various other Saxon settlers of the 5th and 6th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • MANY MOTIVES: GEOFFREY of MONMOUTH and the REASONS for HIS FALSIFICATION of HISTORY John J. Berthold History 489 April 23, 2012
    MANY MOTIVES: GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH AND THE REASONS FOR HIS FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY John J. Berthold History 489 April 23, 2012 i ABSTRACT This paper examines The History of the Kings of Britain by Geoffrey of Monmouth, with the aim of understanding his motivations for writing a false history and presenting it as genuine. It includes a brief overview of the political context of the book at the time during which it was first introduced to the public, in order to help readers unfamiliar with the era to understand how the book fit into the world of twelfth century England, and why it had the impact that it did. Following that is a brief summary of the book itself, and finally a summary of the secondary literature as it pertains to Geoffrey’s motivations. It concludes with the claim that all proposed motives are plausible, and may all have been true at various points in Geoffrey’s career, as the changing times may have forced him to promote the book for different reasons, and under different circumstances than he may have originally intended. Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Who was Geoffrey of Monmouth? 3 Historical Context 4 The Book 6 Motivations 11 CONCLUSION 18 WORKS CITED 20 WORKS CONSULTED 22 1 Introduction Sometime between late 1135 and early 1139 Geoffrey of Monmouth released his greatest work, Historia Regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain in modern English).
    [Show full text]
  • The Prophecies of Merlin in History
    Dialogues: Undergraduate Research in Philosophy, History, and Politics Volume 1 Article 5 2019 “Who Now Shall Believe That Liar, Merlin?”: The rP ophecies of Merlin in History Megan L. Cairns Thompson Rivers University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.tru.ca/phpdialogues Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Cairns, Megan L. (2019) "“Who Now Shall Believe That Liar, Merlin?”: The rP ophecies of Merlin in History," Dialogues: Undergraduate Research in Philosophy, History, and Politics: Vol. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.library.tru.ca/phpdialogues/vol1/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ TRU Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dialogues: Undergraduate Research in Philosophy, History, and Politics by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ TRU Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Who Now Shall Believe That Liar, Merlin?”: The rP ophecies of Merlin in History Abstract This research article examines Merlin's prophecies and how their political use has shifted from one of belief and of direct political significance, to general disbelief. It examines how the use of prophecy exploited the prestige of King Arthur and Merlin. Tactics used to take advantage of this prestige ranged from rulers claiming blood relation to King Arthur to learned men interpreting existing prophecies. Sources, such as Wace, Geoffrey of Monmouth, and modern day novelists, are used to illustrate the prophecies’ evolution from the twelfth to the twentieth century and what it means. Keywords Merlin, prophecies This article is available in Dialogues: Undergraduate Research in Philosophy, History, and Politics: https://digitalcommons.library.tru.ca/phpdialogues/vol1/iss1/5 Cairns: “Who Now Shall Believe That Liar, Merlin?” In the 1130s, Orderic Vitalis, a Benedictine monk, happened upon the Prophetiae Merlini.
    [Show full text]
  • The Matter of Britain
    The Matter of Britain The Mythological and Philosophical Significance of the British Legends by John J. Davenport Department of Philosophy Fordham University [email protected] In honor of Stephen R. Donaldson Originally composed in 1997 for relatives and friends from the UK, this work has been shared with others since. I make it available to all for any pleasure and insight it may bring. last revised November, 2004 Contents Introduction : The Mystery Part I: The Cycle of Britain 1. Historical Context 2. Archetypal Background 3. Brutus and the Founding of Britain 4. The Paradigmatic Language of Myth and Legend 5. The Development of Arthurian Legend 6. The British Cycle Part II: Themes of the British Legend 7. Spenser's Paean to Arthur 8. The Arthurian Vision 9. The Island Kingdom 10. Impregnable Wierd and the Human Will 11. The Tragic Poignance of Humanity 12. Poignance and the Mark of Mortality 13. The Phenomenology of Poignance Conclusion: Resentiment or Eucatastrophe -- 1 -- The Matter of Britain Introduction Oh England my Lionheart I'm in your garden fading fast in your arms The soldiers soften, the war is over. The air raid shelters are blooming clover; Flapping umbrellas fill the lanes, My London Bridge in rain again... This first stanza of Kate Bush's song, “Lionheart,” evokes a legendary image of ‘Britain' only to relate it to modern imagery, specifically the legacy of World War II. The nostalgic mood, as we learn in the last stanza, reflects a dying soldier’s last vision of the spirit of his country—the desires and symbols native to this land for which he would give his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey of Monmouth, Historia Regum Britanniae, a Variant Version. Edited
    THE MEDIAEVAL ACADEMY OF AMERICA PUBLICATION No. 57 GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH VARIANT VERSION OF HIS HISTORIA REGUM BRITANNIAE GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH HISTORIA REGUM BRITANNIAE A VARIANT VERSION EDITED FROM MANUSCRIPTS BY JACOB HAMMER HUNTER COLLEGE THE MEDIAEVAL ACADEMY OF AMERICA CAMBRIDGE 38, MASSACHUSETTS 1951 The publication of this book was made possible by grants of funds to the Academy from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, the Institute for Advanced Study, and an Anonymous Donor COPYRIGHT BY THE MEDIAEVAL ACADEMY OF AMERICA 1951 Printed in U.S.A. TO E. A. LOWE AND THE MEMORY OF ERNST RIESS PREFACE In 1927 Professor Chambers wrote: Critical work on the manuscripts (of Geoffrey of Monmouth) is still in its infancy, and in these circumstances speculation as to the original form of the Historia and any revision which it may have undergone can only be tentative.1 Two years later, in 1929, two editions of Geoffrey appeared,2 which constitute a real advance over the older, uncritical editions. The present edition which offers the first critical text of a Variant Version of the Historia, based on manuscripts that hitherto passed under the name of Geoffrey, is only another step in this advance. It represents the first fruits of an investigation undertaken many years ago and is preliminary to a critical edition of the Historia, based on all manuscripts known to scholars, the larger portion of which (135 in actual numbers) has already been col- lated. A task of this scope could not have been undertaken without outside assistance. It was thanks to the generous grants (and publication sub- vention) from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation and the American Council of Learned Societies that it was possible to visit the various libraries of Europe and collect the material necessary for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    NOTES Introduction 1 . Siân Echard, Arthurian Narrative in the Latin Tradition , Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 36 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 ), p. 14; Helen Cooper, The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 ), pp. 26–27; Anne F. Sutton and Livia Visser-Fuchs, “The Dark Dragon of the Normans: A Creation of Geoffrey of Monmouth, Stephen of Rouen, and Merlin Silvester,” Quondam et Futurus: A Journal of Arthurian Interpretations 2.2 ( 1992 ): 2 [1–19]. 2 . Julia Briggs discusses the Vortiger and Uther Pendragon plays per- formed by Philip Henslowe’s company as well as William Rowley’s The Birth of Merlin and Thomas Middleton’s Hengist , “New Times and Old Stories: Middleton’s Hengist ,” Literary Appropriations of the Anglo-Saxons from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century , ed. Donald Scragg and Carole Weinberg, Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England 29 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 ), pp. 108–9 [107–21]. 3 . For evidence supporting a late 1138 date for Geoffrey’s HRB , see Wright, introduction to HRB Bern , p. xvi [ix-lix] and John Gillingham, “The Context and Purposes of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s History of the Kings of Britain ,” Anglo-Norman Studies 13 (1991 ): 100 n5 [99–118]. 4 . Clarke, introduction to VM , p. vii [vii-50]; Echard, Arthurian Narrative , p. 218. 5 . Lee Patterson, Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987 ), pp. 160, 201, 170, and 187; Virgil, Aeneid in Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid I-VI , trans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arthurian Legend and Imperialism: Geoffrey of Monmouth, Mark
    1 The Arthurian Legend and Imperialism: Geoffrey of Monmouth, Mark Twain and Hollywood Thessa Verwolf 3975967 BA Thesis 7914 Words Utrecht University Department of English Language and Culture Supervisor Dr. Marcelle Cole 29 April 2017 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Monmouth‘s History of the Kings of Britain 3 Mark Twain's A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court 4 King Arthur and Hollywood 5 Conclusions 6 Works Cited 3 1 Introduction America‘s interest in the Middle Ages and especially King Arthur is visible in the many novels and the abundance of films inspired by the Arthurian legend. The medieval legend provided the United States, a new nation founded upon Enlightenment ideas, with a dark history to move away from; a place to progress from. Americans distanced themselves from ―monarchical tyranny‖ (Bull 28-29) and ―backward-looking and hierarchical social systems‖ (Bull 28-29) by forming the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. This critical view on medieval times is evident in Mark Twain‘s A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. Twain‘s perspective in this novel is helpful in the debate on the justification of cultural imperialism. A contrasting view of the Middle Ages that emerged in the 19th century is a pastoral, romanticized and idyllic image, which stemmed from a desire to reconnect with nature and strive for harmony that was lost in the new industrial society. This ―pre-industrial idyll‖ (Bull 19) is evident in Hollywood films, like The First Knight and King Arthur. The Arthurian legend also provided American writers and filmmakers with a fitting backdrop against which America‘s imperialistic history, both in terms of colonialism and cultural imperialism in its appropriation of foreign culture could be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Merlin, Vita Merlini, 2011, 108 Pages, Geoffrey of Monmouth, 1611044618, 9781611044614, Readaclassic.Com, 2011
    The Life of Merlin, Vita Merlini, 2011, 108 pages, Geoffrey of Monmouth, 1611044618, 9781611044614, Readaclassic.com, 2011 DOWNLOAD http://bit.ly/1ZXFeUp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Life_of_Merlin_Vita_Merlini Vita Merlini, or The Life of Merlin, is a work by the Norman-Welsh author Geoffrey of Monmouth, composed in Latin around AD 1150. It retells incidents from the life of the Brythonic seer Merlin, and is based on traditional material about him. Merlin is described as a prophet in the text. There are a number of episodes in which he loses his mind and lives in the wilderness like a wild animal, like Nebuchadnezzar in the Book of Daniel. It is also the first work to describe the Arthurian sorceress Morgan le Fay, as Morgen. Geoffrey had written of Merlin in his two previous works, the Prophetiae Merlini, purported to be a series of prophecies from the sage, and the Historia Regum Britanniae, which is the first work presenting a link between Merlin and King Arthur. The Vita Merlini presents an account of Merlin much more faithful to the Welsh traditions about Myrddin Wyllt, the archetype behind Geoffrey's composite figure of Merlin. Whereas the Historia had Merlin associating with Arthur, his father Uther Pendragon, and his uncle Ambrosius in the 5th century, the Vita's timeframe is during the late 6th century, and includes references to various figures from that period, including Gwenddoleu and Taliesin. Geoffrey attempts to synchronize the Vita with his earlier work by having Merlin mention he had been with Arthur long before. DOWNLOAD http://ow.ly/uxnri https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/The-Life-of-Merlin-Vita-Merlini/id458060204 http://bit.ly/1qxsxLg Curious Punishments of Bygone Days , Alice Morse Earle, Mar 1, 1995, History, 176 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historia Regum Brittanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth and Roman
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Translating Arthur : the Historia regum Brittanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth and Roman de Brut of Wace George Gregory Molchan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Molchan, George Gregory, "Translating Arthur : the Historia regum Brittanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth and Roman de Brut of Wace" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1975. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1975 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. TRANSLATING ARTHUR: THE HISTORIA REGUM BRITANNIAE OF GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH AND ROMAN DE BRUT OF WACE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by George Gregory Molchan B.A., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 1995 M.A., Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2005 December, 2013 DEDICATION For everyone who made this dissertation possible. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing this dissertation has been anything but a traditional process for me. I could not have seen this journey I have been on through to the end without the guidance, emotional support, strength, and love of everyone who helped me along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin Reception of the De Gestis Britonum
    Chapter 7 The Latin Reception of the De gestis Britonum Siân Echard Gerald of Wales famously skewered the veracity of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s his- tory in his story of Meilyr, an illiterate man who could spot falsehood, thanks to devils dancing on the offending tongues or pages. Meilyr’s tormentors could be driven away by the Gospel of John, but when a copy of the De gestis Britonum was placed on his lap, the devils returned in ever greater numbers. Gerald’s anecdote, written in his Itinerary Through Wales in the 1190s, is a witness to the incredible popularity of the DGB less than 50 years after Geoffrey’s death, and that popularity would only grow, as the story was taken up in the vernacular translations discussed in Chapter Eight. Gerald’s skepticism is of a piece with the reactions from other Latin authors dealt with in Chapter Six, but as the present chapter will show, the rise of Arthurian literature as a vernacular phe- nomenon, and the dismissal of Geoffrey’s work (and Arthur’s historicity) by some Anglo-Latin historians, give a potentially misleading impression about the importance that the DGB continued to have in the Latin tradition, well into the early modern period. First, while the centrality of the Arthuriad to the DGB cannot be overstated, Geoffrey is also responsible for promulgating several other highly popular and influential myths, of interest to both Latinate and vernacular readers in the Middle Ages and beyond; that is, Geoffrey’s impor- tance reaches beyond the Arthurian tradition. And second, while some Latin writers may have reacted negatively to Geoffrey’s work, others set about com- menting on it, supplementing it, and even writing their own Latin Arthurian narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • “Aluen Hine Iuengen”: Fairies, Arthur, and Ideal Kingship in Lawman's Brut
    "Aluen hine iuengen": Fairies, Arthur, and Ideal Kingship “Aluen hine iuengen”: Fairies, Arthur, and Ideal Kingship in Lawman’s Brut Nicholas Dalbey Deans’ Distinguished Essay Award recipient Abstract The supernatural themes that most readers know from the Arthurian stories, such as Merlin and Avalon, did not always serve as the primary focus in early Arthurian myths. Instead, Arthurian writers attempted to establish a reliable historical link with the past. Between the mid-12th and early 13th century, Geoffrey of Monmouth, Wace, and Lawman wrote a series of historical narratives that helped establish the foundation myth of Britain. Although each author built on the work of his predecessor, each writer also expanded and redacted scenes for his own literary purposes—particularly in relation to supernatural events. Compared to Geoffrey and Wace, Lawman uses supernatural elements more freely and emphatically. Not only does Arthur in Brut possess spiritual overtones, he also becomes a kind of liminal figure who has one foot in the world of men and one foot in the world of fairies. Much of Arthur’s liminality stems from Lawman’s use of Anglo-Saxon heroic tradition, especially when compared to a hero like Beowulf. And while it is tempting to read English literature as a vehicle for creating English nationalism, especially considering that many scholars seem to read Lawman’s Arthur as a co-opted hero for English nationalism, literature can serve other purposes than ideologically upholding nascent notions of nationhood. Unlike Geoffrey and Wace, both of whom use Arthur for predominantly political purposes, I argue that Lawman’s emphasis on Arthur’s spiritual qualities is meant not just to be emblematic of an English king but also to create a complex literary character who functions primarily to critique both Norman and English forms of ideal kingship.
    [Show full text]