Women in Ecclesiastical Authority Position Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women in Ecclesiastical Authority Position Paper Women in Ecclesiastical Authority Position Paper Prepared for the Elders of City Church Canton by Christopher Dewar and Jacob Shar. November 28, 2017 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Word of Caution .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Synopsis of Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Why is our Position Changing? ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 What is our Rationale? ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Creation Account ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Prophesy as Authority .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Biblical Church Structure ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Types of Ecclesiastical Leadership outlined in Scripture .......................................................................................................... 5 Are Elder and Overseer Synonymous? ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Acts 20:17-28 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Phil 1:1 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1 Tim 3:1-5, Titus 1:5-10....................................................................................................................................................... 7 NT on Female Eldership ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 1 Peter 5:1: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Peter 5:5 ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1 Tim 5:1 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Titus 2:2-3 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Examples of OT Women who Exercise Authority .......................................................................................................................... 9 Examples of NT Women who Exercise Authority .......................................................................................................................... 9 Answering Problematic Passages ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Household Codes | Eph 5:21-6:9; Col 3:18-41; 1 Tim 2:8-15, 1 Pet 3:1-7, etc. ............................................................................. 9 1 Cor 11:7-12 ................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 1 Cor 14:34-35 .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 1 Tim 2:12 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Implications ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Ecclesiastical Authority Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Women in Eldership ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Can Women be Overseers?.......................................................................................................................................................... 12 PURPOSE The purpose of this work is to outline the official position of City Church Canton concerning the topic of Women in Ecclesiastical Authority. It will present our position, a brief hermeneutical discussion concerning our scriptural rational concerning this position, an examination of passages that appear problematic to our position, and concluding thoughts and implications. WORD OF CAUTION As a body of believers, City Church strives to maintain a firm adherence to those beliefs essential to our faith (dogma, as expressed in the Apostle’s Creed and Nicene Creed). We recognize truth exists, and is knowable. However, we also acknowledge that, due to our sinful nature, we cannot always perfectly agree on the ways in which we are to interpret every nuance of Christ’s revelation in scripture. Accordingly, there are numerous opinions concerning the proper interpretation of countless theological, ecclesiastical, and practical matter that often contradict each other. City strives to ensure our people maintain a theologically and methodologically consistent practice of personal scriptural interpretation, instead of requiring our people to adhere to a ridged doctrinal structure outlined by our community. In other words, in matters that don’t rise to the level of salvific import (such as this issue), City usually would not take an official position, because both sides of the debate interpret the relatively scarce discussion of such topics within scripture in a reasonable manner. This is not to say both sides are right; in fact, both sides are likely at least partially right and partially wrong. We are simply saying that we will not (and cannot) positively know which side is right until Christ returns, or we go to Him. Accordingly, please don’t excommunicate each other for disagreeing on this issue. City will be presenting our current position below, but accepting this position is not a requirement for Stewardship, Leadership, or Service within City. SYNOPSIS OF FINDINGS FINDING ONE: WOMEN CAN SERVE AS ELDERS, DEACONS, PASTORS, TEACHERS, AND OTHER LEADERS AT CITY CHURCH. FINDING TWO: WE NOW RECOGNIZE THREE ECCLESIASTICAL OFFICES (ELDER, DEACON, AND OVERSEER) THAT SERVE DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS WITHIN THE CHURCH. WHY IS OUR POSITION CHANGING? While discussing the topic of Women in Authority this past summer, Pastor Chris noticed an area of inconsistency in his interpretation of the qualifications of overseers in 1st Timothy and Titus. Note: Up to this point, City has been operating under the assumption that “Overseer” is synonymous with “Elder” in Scripture. The inconsistency: Why do we allow unmarried, young, and fatherless men to be elders based on these passages, while disqualifying women? After months of study and prayer, the elders have determined that it appears the office of Overseer is a distinct office different from but related to “Elder” in the early church (this office likely was draw from the body of elders in an established congregation). This distinction is backed up by numerous references in the writings of the Early Church Fathers, including Ignatius, Clement, Hippolytus, and the Didache and Apostolic Constitutions.1 Accordingly, the qualifications for “overseer” Listed in 1st Tim and Titus do not apply to elders in general. Additionally, 1st Tim and Titus both briefly discuss “Elder” or “Older” women in their later chapters, within the context of respect for ecclesiastical leadership (and, in the case of Titus, Elders in general). Finally, Scripture is replete with examples of women exercising authority appropriately in a favorable manner over men, women, and children (See: Lists of OT and NT Women Exercising Authority, below). WHAT IS OUR RATIONALE? CREATION ACCOUNT In Hebrew culture, to give a name is to imply the giver’s authority over the one named.2 Prior to the fall, Man and Woman were unnamed (called, not named), and their descriptors -ish and ishah - were intrinsically tied (Gen 2:23). Both Men and Women were created in God’s Image (Gen 1:27) The Word “Helper” does not automatically
Recommended publications
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cult of Apollon Pleurenos in Lydia* (Pi. Xvi-Xvii)
    THE CULT OF APOLLON PLEURENOS IN LYDIA* (PI. XVI-XVII) Two inscribed stelai were purchased in 1994 by the Bergama Museum from a dealer who reported that they had been found (or unearthed ?) at Yenikoy (formerly Hasankiram or Hacihasankirani)1, which is situated in the north of the lake Marmara Golii, the ancient Gygaia / Koloe, in the north of Sardis. Due to the importance of these texts we hereby publish them without delay. In 1982 L. Robert published an inscription from Kemerdamlan2, located in the north of Sardis, in which a priest of Apollon Pleurenos and an association mystai3 honor a certain Euxenos of Sardis who functioned as 6 erci TCOV tepcov Jtpocr68cov, " responsible for the sacred revenues". It is probable, as L. Robert suggested, that the ethnic Pleurenos, if it is not derived from an indigenous toponym, points to a people who lived near the shore (nkzvpa, plural from the neuter nA,et>pov) of the lake Koloe, near modern Golmarmara, which is in close proximity to the find-spot at Kemerdamlan4. The two texts presented here (hereafter Text 1 and Text 2), which record both the ethnic nA.e,up£v6<; (Text 2, 4) and the toponym We wish to thank P. Herrmann for his kind advice during the preparation of this article, and to Rose Lou Bengisu for revising the English. 1 For other inscriptions from Yenikoy see TAM V, 1, 618, 625, 630, 639; H. W. Pleket, Talanta 10-11 (1978/9), 85ff., nos. 11-12 and H. Malay, Greek and Latin Inscriptions in the Manisa Museum (Wien 1994), 523 (recording Thamoreitai, Arillenoi and the cult of Zeus Driktes).
    [Show full text]
  • Erken Lydia Dönemi Tarihi Ve Arkeolojisi
    T.C. AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ARKEOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI 2019-YL–196 ERKEN LYDIA DÖNEMİ TARİHİ VE ARKEOLOJİSİ HAZIRLAYAN Murat AKTAŞ TEZ DANIŞMANI Prof. Dr. Engin AKDENİZ AYDIN- 2019 T.C. AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜNE AYDIN Arkeoloji Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Programı öğrencisi Murat AKTAŞ tarafından hazırlanan Erken Lydia Dönemi Tarihi ve Arkeolojisi başlıklı tez, …….2019 tarihinde yapılan savunma sonucunda aşağıda isimleri bulunan jüri üyelerince kabul edilmiştir. Unvanı, Adı ve Soyadı : Kurumu : İmzası : Başkan : Prof. Dr. Engin AKDENİZ ADÜ ………… Üye : Doç. Dr. Ali OZAN PAÜ ………… Üye : Dr. Öğr. Üyesi. Aydın ERÖN ADÜ ………… Jüri üyeleri tarafından kabul edilen bu Yüksek Lisans tezi, Enstitü Yönetim Kurulunun …………..tarih………..sayılı kararı ile onaylanmıştır. Doç. Dr. Ahmet Can BAKKALCI Enstitü Müdürü V. iii T.C. AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜNE AYDIN Bu tezde sunulan tüm bilgi ve sonuçların, bilimsel yöntemlerle yürütülen gerçek deney ve gözlemler çerçevesinde tarafımdan elde edildiğini, çalışmada bana ait olmayan tüm veri, düşünce, sonuç ve bilgilere bilimsel etik kurallarının gereği olarak eksiksiz şekilde uygun atıf yaptığımı ve kaynak göstererek belirttiğimi beyan ederim. …../…../2019 Murat AKTAŞ iv ÖZET ERKEN LYDIA DÖNEMİ TARİHİ VE ARKEOLOJİSİ Murat AKTAŞ Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Arkeoloji Anabilim Dalı Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Engin AKDENİZ 2019, XVI + 157 sayfa Batı Anadolu’da Hermos (Gediz) ve Kaystros (Küçük Menderes) ırmaklarının vadilerini kapsayan coğrafyaya yerleşen Lydialılar'ın nereden ve ne zaman geldikleri kesin olarak bilinmemektedir. Ancak Lydialılar'ın MÖ II. bin yılın ikinci yarısından itibaren Anadolu’da var oldukları anlaşılmaktadır. Herodotos, Troia savaşından itibaren Herakles oğullarının bölgede beş yüz yıl hüküm sürdüğünden bahseder.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 8 | 1995 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.605 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1995 Number of pages: 205-266 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion », Kernos [Online], 8 | 1995, Online since 11 April 2011, connection on 16 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 Kernos Kernos, 8 (1995), p, 205-266. EpigrapWc Bulletin for Greek Religion 1991 (EBGR) This fifth issue of BEGR presents the publications of 1991 along with several addenda to BEGR 1987-1990. The division of the work between New York and Heidelberg, for the first time this year, caused certain logistical prablems, which can be seen in several gaps; some publications of 1991 could not be considered for this issue and will be included in the next BEGR, together with the publications of 1992. We are optimistic that in the future we will be able to accelerate the presentation of epigraphic publications. The principles explained in Kernos, 4 (991), p. 287-288 and Kernos, 7 (994), p. 287 apply also to this issue, The abbreviations used are those of L'Année Philologique and the Supplementum Bpigraphicum Graecum. We remind our readers that the bulletin is not a general bibliography on Greek religion; works devoted exclusively to religious matters (marked here with an asterisk) are presented very briefly, even if they make extensive use of inscriptions, In exceptional cases (see n° 87) we include in our bulletin studies on the Linear B tablets.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
    T.C. EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ARKEOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI ANTİK DÖNEMDE ÖDEMİŞ VE ÇEVRESİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Berkan YILMAZ TEZ DANIŞMANI Prof.Dr. Cumhur TANRIVER İZMİR-2014 Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğüne sunduğum “Antik Dönemde Ödemiş ve Çevresi” adlı yüksek lisans tezinin tarafımdan bilimsel, ahlak ve normlara uygun bir şekilde hazırlandığını, tezimde yararlandığım kaynakları bibliyografyada ve dipnotlarda gösterdiğimi onurumla doğrularım. Berkan YILMAZ İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ GİRİŞ………………………………………………………………………………… 1 I. ARAŞTIRMA TARİHÇESİ VE LOKALİZOSYONU…………………………2 II. BÖLGENİN GENEL TARİHİ…………………………………………………..19 III. DİN VE MİTOLOJİ……………………………………………………………..46 IV. RESMİ KURUM VE ÜNVANLAR…………………………………………….74 V. EKONOMİK YAPI……………………………………………………………….80 VI. BÖLGEDEKİ ANTİK YERLEŞİMLERİN BAŞKA YERLEŞİMLERLE İLİŞKİLERİ…………………………………………………………..……………….92 VII. ARKEOLOJİK BULUNTULAR ………………………………………………95 VII.1. KERAMİKLER……………………………………………………………95 VII.2. MİMARİ………………………………………..…………………………104 VII.3. SİKKELER……………………………………………………………….114 VII.3. 1. HYPAİPA…………………………………………..………………114 VII.3. 2. DİOSHİERON……………………………………………………..122 VII.3. 3. KİLBİANOİ………………………………………………………..126 VII.3. 4. NEİKAİA…………………………………………………………...129 VII.3. 5. KAYSTROS………………………………………………………..135 VII.3. 6. TMOLOS-AURELİOPOLİS……………………………………..136 VII.4. ANTİK METİNLER VE YAZITLAR………………………………….138 VII.4. 1. HYPAİPA…………………………………………………………..138 VII.4. 2. KİLBİANOS………………………………………………………..190 VII.4. 2. 1. NEİKAİA………………………………………………...192 VII.4. 2. 1. PALAİAPOLİS………………………………………….195
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 92 (1992) 267–279 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
    FRITZ GRAF AN ORACLE AGAINST PESTILENCE FROM A WESTERN ANATOLIAN TOWN aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 92 (1992) 267–279 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 267 AN ORACLE AGAINST PESTILENCE FROM A WESTERN ANATOLIAN TOWN* 1. In the first issue of a new periodical edited by the Austrian Archaeological Institute, Dieter Knibbe gives the text of an inscription found in the Austrian excavations in Ephesus1; this publication is the appendix to a long article on the Monument for the Parthian Wars in Ephesus and intends nothing more than to give a first information about the text, with but a very short commentary and no photographs. Reinhold Merkelbach, who took up the text with some modifications and a conjecture as to its origin, rightly stresses the merit of such a quick, even if very temporary and provisional publication.2 The text is written on a coffer slab ("Kassettenfüllung") of white marble (height 1.09 m, width 0.89 m) which had been reused as a pavement block near the small square where the two main Ephesian streets, "Theaterstrasse" and "Kuretenstrasse", meet, close to the library of Celsus, the arch of Trajan and a monumental altar which Knibbe (among others) thinks the Parthian monument of Lucius Verus; the find spot is relevant for the text, as will become clear soon. The letter forms date the inscription to the 2nd cent. A.D. For its reuse, the top of the slab was cut back: we thus miss the beginning of the text. There is no hint as to its original dimension, and since it belonged to an architectural structure with (presumably) more than one such piece, we cannot be certain whether the text has been written only onto one such slab.
    [Show full text]
  • ANADOLU UYGARLIKLARI Paleolitik
    ANADOLU UYGARLIKLARI DERS NOTLARI Paleolitik Çağ Kelime anlamı olarak eski yunanca Paleos= Eski ve Lithos= taş kelimelerinden türemiş ve dilimize “ Eskitaş veya Yontmataş Çağı” olarak çevrilmiştir.Günümüzden yaklaşık 400 bin yıl önce başlayan bu dönem yaklaşık 7 bin yılına kadar süregelmiştir. Bu dönemde uzunca bir süre buzul çağı yaşanmış olması sebebiyle insan toplulukları mağara yerleşimlerinde yaşamak zorunda kalmışlardır. Bu dönemde ortaya çıkan Homo Erectus insanın ilk atası olarak sayılmaktadır. Üretim konusunda hiçbir bilgisi olmayan, geçimini avcılık toplayıcılık ile sağlayan bu insanlar günlük yaşantılarını doğada kolaylıkla bulunan çakıl taşlarından kaba aletler yaparak sağlıyorlardı. İnsanlık tarihinin en uzun sürecini oluşturan bu dönem taş teknolojilerindeki gelişimlere göre “Alt”, “Orta” ve “Üst” olmak üzere üç ana bölüme ayrılmaktadır. Anadolu‟da Paleolitik Çağ‟ın en eski yerleşim yeri İstanbul‟da Küçük Çekmece Gölü‟nün kuzey ucundaki Yarımburgaz Mağarası‟dır. İki doğal oyuktan oluşan bu mağara çift girişlidir. Yukarı mağara Ortaçağlarda bir şapel (küçük kilise) olarak kullanılmıştır. Aşağı Mağara ise daha büyüktür ve uzunluğu yaklaşık 600 m.yi bulur. Alt Paleolitik‟ten başlayarak Roma ve Bizans dönemlerine kadar süreklilik gösteren 16 tabakadan oluşur. Mağarada Homo Erectus tarzında bir insan fosili ile çok ilkel sayılabilecek ölçülerde çakmak taşı ve kuvarsit yonga aletlerine rastlanılmıştır.Ayrıca köpek, ayı ve bazı boynuzlu hayvanlara ait kemikler yine burada bulunmuştur. Anadolu‟da Yarımburgaz‟dan hemen sonraya ait stragrafik nitelikte buluntu veren en önemli yerleşim yeri Antalya‟nın 30 km kuzeybatısında, denizden 450 m yükseklikte yer alan Karain Mağarası‟dır. Bu mağara yerleşiminin korunaklı konumu, ağzının güneye açık oluşu ve geniş bir oturum alanının bulunması sebebiyle her devrede insanların sığınabileceği bir alan olmuştur.
    [Show full text]
  • Der ZPE-Bände 1-100
    AUTOREN- UND TITELVERZEICHNIS ZU ZPE BAND 1 (1967) – BAND 100 (1994) AALDERS, G. J. D., Einige zusätzliche Bemerkungen zum Kölner Mani Kodex. 34 (1979) 27. ABD-EL GHANY, M., Notes on the Penthemeral Reports of Revenue Accounts in Roman Egypt. 82 (1990) 107. ABERSON, M. / SOLIN, H., Confrequento in Stiftungsformeln. 49 (1982) 154. ABRAMENKO, A., Ein neues Collegium der Augustalität. 85 (1991) 172. —, Ein Sevir Iunior aus Mediolanum als curator rei publicae? 91 (1992) 151. —, Ein weiterer natalis municipii. 91 (1992) 156. —, Zum Fehlen von cognomina in der Nomenklatur von Freigelassenen: Der Befund der Augustalität. 93 (1992) 91. —, Zu einem collegium insulae in einer unverstandenen lateinischen Grabinschrift aus An- cyra (CIL III 271 = 6769). 93 (1992) 96. —, Othonianus. Zur Genese von cognomina aus militärischer Terminologie. 95 (1993) 226. —, Die Wirtschaftskrise des 3. Jh.n.Chr. und das Ende der Augustalität. 99 (1993) 207. —, Ein weiterer Dekurio der Colonia Equestris. Zur Titulatur des römischen Ritters Aureli- us Crispus. 99 (1993) 214. ACCORINTI, D., ÑIppÒti! ÜVrh. 91 (1992) 52. ADAMS, J. N., Two Unexplained Misspellings in Claudius Terentianus: Greek Interference in Egyptian Latin? 31 (1978) 135. —, The Latinity of C.Novius Eunus. 82 (1990) 227. ADAMS, J. N. / BRENNAN, P. M., The Text at Lactantius, De Mortibus Persecutorum 44. 2 and Some Epigraphic Evidence for Italian Recruits. 84 (1990) 183. AGER, S. L., A Royal Arbitration between Klazomenai and Teos? 85 (1991) 87. AICHINGER, A., Adlectus in amplissimum ordinem? Zur Inschrift für "Aquilinus", CIL VIII 27949 = ILAlg I 3634. 36 (1979) 211. —, Grenzziehung durch kaiserliche Sonderbeauftragte in den römischen Provinzen. 48 (1982) 193.
    [Show full text]
  • Haci Hasanlar Köyü Ve Buluntulari
    KAYSTROS (KÜÇÜK MENDERES) OVASINDA YEN~~ B~R ANT~K YER / B~RG~~ YAKININDAK~~ HACI HASANLAR KÖYÜ VE BULUNTULARI B~NNUR GÜRLER* Kaystros (Küçük Menderes) ovas~ nda saptanan elliye yak~ n antik yer- le~me yerinin, büyük bir ço~unlu~u Pentakoma (Mendegüme) gibi da~~ ya- mac~~ ve eteklerinde bulunurken, az bir bölümü ise ova yerle~meleri halin- deydi '.Bugün, bu antik yerle~imlerden 14 adedi Ödemi~~ ilçe s~ n~ rlar~~ içinde yer almaktad~ r. Kaystros (Küçük Menderes) ovas~ n~ n orta bölümünde Kaystroslular, do- ~uda ise Kilboslular Hellenistik döneme kadar da~~n~ k köy topluluklar~~ ha- linde ya~~ yorlard~ . ~ lk kurulan ~ehir Ödemi~'in kuzeyindeki Hypaipa'd~ r (Tapay=Datbey=Günlüce). Kaystroslular~ n ikinci kurduklar~~ ~ehir Dioshi- eron'dur (Birgi)2. Hypaipa ve Dioshieron antik ça~da bölgenin en önemli ~ehirleri aras~ nda yer al~ yordu 3. Dioshieron, Bizans döneminde Pyrgion ad~ n~~ alm~~~ olan bugünkü Birgi yerle~imidir 4. Pyrgion Bizans döneminde Theira (Tire) ile birlikte Kaystros ovas~ n~ n iki önemli kentinden biridir5. Neikaia (Ayazurat=Türkönü), Koloe (Kiraz) ve Palaiapolis (Balyambolu=Beyda~) ise Kilboslu halklar taraf~ ndan kurulmu~~ ~ehirlerden baz~ lar~ d~ r. Özellikle Roma imparatorluk döneminde zengin bir k~ rsal ya~am~ n varl~~~ , bilinen antik köy Doç.Dr. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü. I R.MER~ Ç, Küçük Menderes (Kaystros) Havzas~ n~ n Tarihsel Co~rafyas~ , Ege Üniversitesi, ~ zmir 1983 (yaymlanmam~~~ doçentlik tezi), 69. 2 R.MER~Ç, "Antik Dönemde Küçük Menderes Hawasm~ n Tarihsel Co~rafyas~ na Genel Bir Bak~~", Ege Co~rafya Dergisi, 4, ~ zmir 1988, 206. 3 W.M.LEAKE, Journal Of A Tour In Asia Minor, New York, 1976, 256-257.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CITIES and BISHOPRICS of PHRYGIA. THIS Paper Is Really the First Part of a Report on the Results Attained in 1883 by The
    370 THE CITIES AND BISHOPRICS OF PHRYGIA. THE CITIES AND BISHOPRICS OF PHRYGIA. THIS paper is really the first part of a report on the results attained in 1883 by the Asia Minor Exploration Fund. Besides some minor excursions, I then made two long journeys in the interior of Asia Minor, June to October. I was accompanied almost the whole of the time by Mr. J. R. S. Sterrett, a Virginian student at the American School of Athens. Our usual practice was to ride by separate roads,1 and in this way the expedition sur- veyed a much wider country than if I had been alone : the results were so good that I am anxious to arrange the expedition of 1884 in a similar way. Our chief aim was to construct the map of ancient Phrygia, and our method was to examine each district thoroughly enough to be able to say, not only where there were, but also where there were not, ancient sites. The discovery of monuments and inscriptions was a secondary object, and we did not aim at completeness in this regard ; but even here our results are important. We copied more than four hundred and fifty inscriptions, which is at the rate of one hundred per month, and I incorporate in this paper those which have most direct bearing on the antiquities of each district. Most of them have passed under the eyes of both of us: where only one of us actually copied the inscription from the stone, I give his initials at the head of the text: where no initials are attached, it is to be understood that we have both verified the text on the stone.3 I shall speak at another time of the monuments which we found.
    [Show full text]
  • Cius - New Roman Finds on the Danubian Limes in Scythia (Dobrodja)
    CIUS - NEW ROMAN FINDS ON THE DANUBIAN LIMES IN SCYTHIA (DOBRODJA) BY COSTEL CHIRIAC, CARMEN UNGUREANU The Roman fort from Cius (being in our days near Gârliciu village, Constanţa County) is placed not far from the right bank of the Danube, on the edge of Hassarlîc Lake. In the vicinity of the Roman fortification, to its Southern side, a large rural Getian settlement of Hellenistic epocii and one belonging to the Roman epoch (vicus?) from the 2th-4th centuries, were active in the past. Cius fortification is settled on the Lower Danube ’s limes, between the large centers from Carsium (Hârşova), at the south and the ex-residence of the 5th Legion Macedonica, Troesmis (Turcoaia), at the north (see the map)1. Cius was mentioned in the ancient literary sources 2 *and * at the same time, from the same site are published many inscriptions, already known\ It seems that during the Principate it was the residence of cohors I Lusitanorum Cyrenaicd x and in the year 369 it was rebuilt by Valens5. Notitia Dignitatum, Or. XXXIX, 6, 14 mentions Cius as the stationary place of the cavalry unit citneus equitum Stablesianorum 6. A stamped brick found here mentions the name of FI. Rumoridus who was magister mihtum under Theodosius I (379-395)7. Among other accidental finds we mention that some time ago, a bronze monetary hoard from fhe 4th ceniuiy was found 8. Herejnafter, fallows the presentation of a lot of 31 bronze coins and two lead seals found by chance at the beginning of tbe 9th decade within the territory and in the immediale vicinity of the fort Cius.
    [Show full text]
  • HELENİSTİK DÖNEMİN METROPOL ŞEHRİ: PERGAMON Metropole City of the Hellenistic Period: Pergamon Cuma Ali YILMAZ1 Fırat GÜLERDOĞAN2
    ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi The Journal of International Social Sciences Cilt: 31, Sayı: 1, Sayfa: 455-476, OCAK – 2021 Makale Gönderme Tarihi: 23.08.2020 Kabul Tarihi: 18.10.2020 HELENİSTİK DÖNEMİN METROPOL ŞEHRİ: PERGAMON Metropole City of the Hellenistic Period: Pergamon Cuma Ali YILMAZ1 Fırat GÜLERDOĞAN2 ÖZ Helenistik Dönem (MÖ 336-30) kültürel, sosyal ve iktisadi açıdan Anadolu tarihi için bir dönüm noktasıdır. Sınırları Hindistan’a kadar dayanan Makedonya Krallığı, Büyük İskender’in MÖ 323 yılında ölmesiyle ardılları tarafından parçalanmış ve her bir general kendi krallığını ilan etmiştir. Çalışma konumuz olan Pergamon Krallığı (MÖ 280 – 133)’da bu krallıklardan bir tanesidir. Söz konusu krallık, Anadolu’da Helenistik kültürün önemli bir temsilcisi konumundadır. Anadolu’nun bilim ve sanat merkezi olan Pergamon, kentleşme, mimari, dini ve kültürel alanda Helenistik dönemin karakteristiğini yansıtan bir krallık başkentidir. Makedonya Krallığı’nın yıkılışının kısa bir analizi ile başlayacak olan çalışmamızda, Pergamon Şehri, Helenistik Dönem öncesi ve Helenistik Dönem olmak üzere iki ana başlık altında incelenecektir. Çalışmamızın sonunda ise, doğu-batı kültür sentezi ürünü olan Pergamon Krallığının Eskiçağ Anadolu tarihi açısından önemi, üstlendiği misyonu ve ardında bıraktığı miras değerlendirilecektir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Helenistik Dönem, Anadolu, Pergamon ABSTRACT The Hellenistic Period (336-30 BC) is an important turning point for the history of Anatolia. The Kingdom of Macedonia, whose borders extend to India, was torn by his successors after Alexander the Great's death in 323 BC. and each general has declared his own kingdom. The Kingdom of Pergamon (280 - 133 BC), our subject of study, is also one of these kingdoms. The kingdom in question is an important representative of Hellenistic culture in Anatolia.
    [Show full text]