DOCSLIB.ORG

The Revision Revised by John William Burgon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Revision Revised by John William Burgon The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Revision Revised by John William Burgon This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Revision Revised Author: John William Burgon Release Date: July 13, 2011 [Ebook 36722] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE REVISION REVISED*** The Revision Revised. Three Articles Reprinted From The “Quarterly Review.” I. The New Greek Text. II. The New English Version. III. Westcott and Hort's New Textual Theory. To Which is Added A Reply to Bishop Ellicott's Pamphlet In Defence Of The Revisers and Their Greek Text of the New Testament: Including a Vindication of the Traditional Reading of 1 Timothy III. 16. By John William Burgon, B.D. Dean of Chichester. “Little children,—Keep yourselves from idols.”—1 John v. 21. Dover Publications, Inc. New York 1971 Contents Dedication. .4 Preface. .7 Article I. The New Greek Text. 27 Article II. The New English Version. 136 Article III. Westcott And Hort's New Textual Theory. 254 Letter To Bishop Ellicott, In Reply To His Pamphlet. 382 Appendix Of Sacred Codices. 530 Index I, of Texts of Scripture,—quoted, discussed, or only referred to in this volume. 542 Index II, of Fathers. 568 Index III, Persons, Places, and Subjects. 577 Footnotes . 613 [iv] [Transcriber's Note: This book contains much Greek text, which will not be well-rendered in plain text versions of this E-book. Also, there is much use of Greek characters with a vertical bar across the tops of the letters to indicate abbreviations; because the coding system used in this e-book does not have such an “overline”, they are rendered here with underlines. It also contains some text in Syriac, which is written right-to-left; for the sake of different transcription methods, it is transcribed here in both right-to-left and left-to-rights, so that regardless of the medium of this E-book, one or the other should be readable.] The following is PREBENDARY SCRIVENER'S recently published estimate of the System on which DRS.WESTCOTT AND HORT have constructed their “Revised Greek Text of the New Testament” (1881).—That System, the Chairman of the Revising Body (BISHOP ELLICOTT) has entirely adopted (see below, pp. 391 to 397), and made the basis of his Defence of THE REVISERS and their “New Greek Text.” (1.) “There is little hope for the stability of their imposing structure, if its foundations have been laid on the sandy ground of ingenious conjecture. And, since barely the smallest vestige of historical evidence has ever been alleged in support of the views of these accomplished Editors, their teaching must either be received as intuitively true, or dismissed from our consideration as precarious and even visionary.” (2.) “DR.HORT'S System is entirely destitute of historical foundation.” (3.) “We are compelled to repeat as emphatically as ever our strong conviction that the Hypothesis to whose proof he has devoted so many laborious years, is destitute not only of historical foundation, but of all probability, resulting from the internal goodness of the Text which its adoption would force upon us.” (4.) “‘We cannot doubt’ (says DR.HORT) ‘that S. Luke xxiii. 34 comes from an extraneous source.’ 3 [Notes, p. 68.]—Nor can we, on our part, doubt,” (rejoins DR.SCRIVENER,) “that the System which entails such consequences is hopelessly self-condemned.” SCRIVENER'S “Plain Introduction,” &c. [ed. 1883]: pp. 531, 537, 542, 604. [v] Dedication. To The Right Hon. Viscount Cranbrook, G.C.S.I., &c., &c., &c. MY DEAR LORD CRANBROOK, Allow me the gratification of dedicating the present Volume to yourself; but for whom—(I reserve the explanation for another day)—it would never have been written. This is not, (as you will perceive at a glance,) the Treatise which a few years ago I told you I had in hand; and which, but for the present hindrance, might by this time have been completed. It has however grown out of that other work in the manner explained at the beginning of my Preface. Moreover it contains not a few specimens of the argumentation of which the work in question, when at last it sees the light, will be discovered to be full. My one object has been to defeat the mischievous attempt which was made in 1881 to thrust upon this Church and Realm a Revision of the Sacred Text, which—recommended though it be by eminent names—I am thoroughly convinced, and am able to [vi] prove, is untrustworthy from beginning to end. The reason is plain. It has been constructed throughout on an utterly erroneous hypothesis. And I inscribe this Volume to you, my friend, as a conspicuous member of that body of faithful and learned Laity by whose deliberate verdict, when the whole of the evidence has been produced and the case has been fully argued out, I shall be quite willing that my contention may stand or fall. The English (as well as the Greek) of the newly “Revised Version” is hopelessly at fault. It is to me simply unintelligible how a company of Scholars can have spent ten years in Dedication. 5 elaborating such a very unsatisfactory production. Their uncouth phraseology and their jerky sentences, their pedantic obscurity and their unidiomatic English, contrast painfully with “the happy turns of expression, the music of the cadences, the felicities of the rhythm” of our Authorized Version. The transition from one to the other, as the Bishop of Lincoln remarks, is like exchanging a well-built carriage for a vehicle without springs, in which you get jolted to death on a newly-mended and rarely-traversed road. But the “Revised Version” is inaccurate as well; exhibits defective scholarship, I mean, in countless places. It is, however, the systematic depravation of the underlying Greek which does so grievously offend me: for this is nothing else but a poisoning of the River of Life at its sacred source. Our Revisers, (with the best and purest intentions, no doubt,) stand convicted of having deliberately rejected the words of [vii] Inspiration in every page, and of having substituted for them fabricated Readings which the Church has long since refused to acknowledge, or else has rejected with abhorrence; and which only survive at this time in a little handful of documents of the most depraved type. As Critics they have had abundant warning. Twelve years ago (1871) a volume appeared on the “last Twelve Verses of the Gospel according to S. Mark,”—of which the declared object was to vindicate those Verses against certain critical objectors, and to establish them by an exhaustive argumentative process. Up to this hour, for a very obvious reason, no answer to that volume has been attempted. And yet, at the end of ten years (1881),—not only in the Revised English but also in the volume which professes to exhibit the underlying Greek, (which at least is indefensible,)—the Revisers are observed to separate off those Twelve precious Verses from their context, in token that they are no part of the genuine Gospel. Such a deliberate preference of “mumpsimus” to “sumpsimus” is by no means calculated to conciliate favour, or even to win respect. The Revisers have in 6 The Revision Revised fact been the dupes of an ingenious Theorist, concerning whose extraordinary views you are invited to read what Dr. Scrivener has recently put forth. The words of the last-named writer (who is facile princeps in Textual Criticism) will be found facing the beginning of the present Dedication. If, therefore, any do complain that I have sometimes hit my opponents rather hard, I take leave to point out that “to [viii] everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the sun”: “a time to embrace, and a time to be far from embracing”: a time for speaking smoothly, and a time for speaking sharply. And that when the words of Inspiration are seriously imperilled, as now they are, it is scarcely possible for one who is determined effectually to preserve the Deposit in its integrity, to hit either too straight or too hard. In handling certain recent utterances of Bishop Ellicott, I considered throughout that it was the “Textual Critic”—not the Successor of the Apostles,—with whom I had to do. And thus I commend my Volume, the fruit of many years of incessant anxious toil, to your indulgence: requesting that you will receive it as a token of my sincere respect and admiration; and desiring to be remembered, my dear Lord Cranbrook, as Your grateful and affectionate Friend and Servant, John W. Burgon. DEANERY,CHICHESTER, All Saints' Day., 1883. [ix] Preface. The ensuing three Articles from the “Quarterly Review,”—(wrung out of me by the publication [May 17th, 1881] of the “Revision” of our “Authorized Version of the New Testament,”)—appear in their present form in compliance with an amount of continuous solicitation that they should be separately published, which it would have been alike unreasonable and ungracious to disregard. I was not prepared for it. It has caused me—as letter after letter has reached my hands—mixed feelings; has revived all my original disinclination and regret. For, gratified as I cannot but feel by the reception my labours have met with,—(and only the Author of my being knows what an amount of antecedent toil is represented by the ensuing pages,)—I yet deplore more heartily than I am able to express, the injustice done to the cause of Truth by handling the subject in this fragmentary way, and by exhibiting the evidence for what is most certainly true, in such a very incomplete form.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek?
    2 Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek? Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek? A Concise Compendium of the Many Internal and External Evidences of Aramaic Peshitta Primacy Publication Edition 1a, May 2008 Compiled by Raphael Christopher Lataster Edited by Ewan MacLeod Cover design by Stephen Meza © Copyright Raphael Christopher Lataster 2008 Foreword 3 Foreword A New and Powerful Tool in the Aramaic NT Primacy Movement Arises I wanted to set down a few words about my colleague and fellow Aramaicist Raphael Lataster, and his new book “Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek?” Having written two books on the subject myself, I can honestly say that there is no better free resource, both in terms of scope and level of detail, available on the Internet today. Much of the research that myself, Paul Younan and so many others have done is here, categorized conveniently by topic and issue. What Raphael though has also accomplished so expertly is to link these examples with a simple and unambiguous narrative style that leaves little doubt that the Peshitta Aramaic New Testament is in fact the original that Christians and Nazarene-Messianics have been searching for, for so long. The fact is, when Raphael decides to explore a topic, he is far from content in providing just a few examples and leaving the rest to the readers’ imagination. Instead, Raphael plumbs the depths of the Aramaic New Testament, and offers dozens of examples that speak to a particular type. Flip through the “split words” and “semi-split words” sections alone and you will see what I mean.
    [Show full text]
  • Novum Testamentum Graece Nestle-Aland 28Th Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    NOVUM TESTAMENTUM GRAECE NESTLE-ALAND 28TH EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Eberhard Nestle | 9781619700307 | | | | | Novum Testamentum Graece Nestle-Aland 28th edition PDF Book Book ratings by Goodreads. It is a very nice sewn binding. Three reasons for ordering Reasonable prices International shipping Secure payment. Answer: Thank you for your question. You are commenting using your Twitter account. Follow us. No additional fonts needed. Holman Christian Standard. Das neue Testament Griechisch A must see site! Canons and books. The site also containscomputer software containing the versions and free Bible study tools. American Standard Version. We try our best to provide a competitive shipping experience for our customers. When I find out I will post the information as an update. This edition introduced a separate critical apparatus and finally introduced consistency to the majority reading principle. It is sewn and flexible. The New Testament arrived in a cardboard box from Hendrickson. It feels like a high quality Bible paper. Aland submitted his work on NA to the editorial committee of the United Bible Societies Greek New Testament of which he was also a member and it became the basic text of their third edition UBS3 in , four years before it was published as the 26th edition of Nestle-Aland. The Greek text of the 28th edition is the same as that of the 5th edition of the United Bible Societies The Greek New Testament abbreviated UBS5 although there are a few differences between them in paragraphing, capitalization, punctuation and spelling. Essential We use cookies to provide our services , for example, to keep track of items stored in your shopping basket, prevent fraudulent activity, improve the security of our services, keep track of your specific preferences e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact and Influence of Erasmus's Greek New Testament
    HISTORICAL STUDIES The Impact and Influence of Erasmus’s Greek New Testament PETER J. GOEMAN Abstract Although often eclipsed by the giants of the Reformation, Desiderius Erasmus had a notable influence on the Reformation and the world that followed. Responsible for five editions of the Greek New Testament, his contributions include a renewed emphasis on the Greek over against the Latin of the day, as well as influence on subsequent Greek New Testaments and many translations, including Luther’s German Bible and the English King James Version. In God’s providence, Erasmus provided kindling for the fire of the Reformation.1 “ he name of Erasmus shall never perish.” Time has proved these words, spoken by one of his friends in the early 1500s, to be true. Today, Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam is recognized as a key figure—especially in regard to his influence on Bible translation and textual criticism. Although his fame has been Tsuperseded by the heroes of the Reformation, many of them were benefi- ciaries of his hard work. The Reformers owed him much. In the English- speaking world, the average person may not know Erasmus’s name, yet those who read the Bible today are indebted both to his contribution and to those he influenced. 1 I would like to thank my friends and colleagues Abner Chou and Will Varner for reading an earlier version of this article and providing valuable feedback. 69 70 UNIO CUM CHRISTO ›› UNIOCC.COM Much has been written about Erasmus’s life, and this article will focus on his work on the Greek New Testament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solid Rock Greek New Testament : Theory and Practice
    The Solid Rock Greek New Testament: Theory and Practice Joey McCollum Abstract The Solid Rock Greek New Testament: Scholar’s Edition offers a recon- structed text of the New Testament based on Byzantine priority theory and expands upon the work of the SBL Greek New Testament by compar- ing the readings of over 10 major critical editions at nearly 8000 units of textual variation. In this survey, we will discuss the goals, principles, and processes underlying the development of this edition, focusing especially on the design and use of the apparatus. As we will show, the resources available in this work make it a valuable addition to the library of anyone involved in the teaching, translation, or study of the Greek New Testament. 1 Introduction 1.1 New Testament Textual Criticism For nearly as long as the Church has recognized the scriptures of the New Testament (ΝΤ) as authoritative, it has also understood that not all copies of these scriptures agree with one another.¹ If we assume that each book of the NT originated in a single inspired autograph, then any two manuscripts cannot both be right where they disagree.² More to the point, where any difference 1. The early church fathers occasionally took note of such differences in the manuscripts known to them. For this reason, their notes serve as crucial evidence for variant readings, sometimes in cases when the reading in the patristic citation has not survived in any NT manuscript. A comprehensive study can be found in Amy M. Donaldson, “Explicit References to New Testament Variant Readings among Greek and Latin Church Fathers” (PhD diss., University of Notre Dame, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Translating the New Testament
    Translating the New Testament Text, Translation, Theology Edited by Stanley E. Porter and Mark J. Boda William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company Grand Rapids, Michigan / Cambridge, U.K. 2009 McMaster New Testament Studies The McMaster New Testament Studies series, edited by Stanley E. Porter, is designed to address particular themes in the New Testament that are of concern to Christians today. Written in a style easily accessible to minis­ ters, students, and laypeople by contributors who are proven experts in their fields of study, the volumes in this series reflect the best of current biblical scholarship while also speaking directly to the pastoral needs of people in the church today. © 2009 Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. All rights reserved Published 2009 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. 2140 Oak Industrial Drive N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49505 / P.O. Box 163, Cambridge CB3 9PU U.K. Printed in the United States of America 14 13 12 11 10 09 7654321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Translating the New Testament: text, translation, theology I edited by Stanley E. Porter and Mark J. Boda. p. cm. — (McMaster New Testament studies) Proceedings of a colloquium held in May 2005 at McMaster Divinity College, Hamilton, Ont. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-8028-6377-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Bible. N.T. — Translating — Congresses. I. Porter, Stanley E., 1956- II. Boda, Mark J. BS449.T7475 2009 220.501 — dc22 2009023800 www.eerdmans.c Southern Baptist Theolnqical Serina*' Lbr? -v 2fl?5 L<jxing?cn Rd. Louisville, κγ 4U28O Contents Preface ix Contributors xii Abbreviations xiv Translating the New Testament: An Introduction to Issues of Text, Translation, and Theology 1 Stanley E.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Original Greek Text of the New Testament
    Notes on the Original Greek Text of the New Testament Michael A. Covington Program in Linguistics, The University of Georgia New in this version: Major update to pronunciation section. This document is available on the Web at http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/nttext.pdf. 14th complete draft, 2004 September 18 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Author’squalifications . 3 2 The New Testament as Holy Scripture 4 2.1 Validityofhistoricalstudy . 4 2.2 Formationofthecanon. .. .. 4 2.3 Protestantvs.Catholicvs.Orthodox . 5 2.4 Biblicalquackery ......................... 5 2.5 Lower vs. higher criticism . 6 3 How the New Testament got to us 7 3.1 Typesofmanuscripts. .. .. 8 3.2 Whymanuscriptsdiffer. 8 3.3 Texttypes............................. 10 3.4 PrintededitionsoftheGreekNT . 12 3.5 Recentdevelopments . 13 3.5.1 Greater confidence in Byzantine text type? . 13 3.5.2 Earlierdatingofpapyri. 14 4 Translating the New Testament 15 4.1 WhatGreekislike ........................ 15 4.2 TheKingJamesVersion . 16 4.2.1 Italicized words in the King James Version . 18 4.3 Moderntranslations . 18 4.4 Aremoretranslationsneeded? . 20 1 5 The inclusive-language issue 21 5.1 Whygenderisaproblem. 21 5.2 Controversies over “inclusive” translations . ... 22 5.3 My opinion on inclusive language . 25 6 Pronunciation of New Testament Greek 26 6.1 TheKoin¯esituation. 26 6.2 Normalpractice.......................... 26 6.3 Aneweralternative. .. .. 27 6.4 Contextofthedispute . 28 6.5 InpraiseofErasmus’folly . 28 7 Specific Greek words and phrases 29 8 Specific textual problems 29 8.1 Gospels .............................. 29 8.2 Acts ................................ 33 8.3 EpistlesofPaul .......................... 33 8.4 GeneralEpistles.......................... 37 8.5 Revelation............................. 39 9 What about the Old Testament? 39 2 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to present, in concise form, some basic information about the New Testament compiled for my own use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Textual History of the Greek New Testament Society of Biblical Literature
    The Textual History of the Greek New Testament Society of Biblical Literature Text-Critical Studies Editor Sidnie White Crawford Number 8 The Textual History of the Greek New Testament The Textual History of the Greek New Testament Changing Views in Contemporary Research Edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta The Textual History of the Greek New Testament Copyright © 2011 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The textual history of the Greek New Testament / edited by Klaus Wachtel and Michael W. Holmes. p. cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature text-critical studies ; no. 8) Proceedings of a colloquium held in 2008 in M?nster, Germany. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58983-624-2 (paper binding : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983-625-9 (electronic format) 1. Bible. N.T.—Criticism, Textual—Congresses. I. Wachtel, Klaus. II. Holmes, Michael W. (Michael William), 1950- BS2325.T49 2011 225.4'86—dc23 2011042791 Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI /NISO Z39.48–1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 standards for paper permanence.
    [Show full text]
  • Uma Bíblia Completa Ou Uma Bíblia Tentativa?
    UMA BÍBLIA COMPLETA OU UMA BÍBLIA TENTATIVA? Por David C. Bennett (DCB), D. Min. Traduzido do Google por Pastor Rui Dias Depois que uma pessoa vem pela fé ao Senhor Jesus Cristo como seu Salvador pessoal da penalidade e poder do pecado (Efésios 2: 8 Porque pela graça sois salvos, por meio da fé e Romanos 10:17). Então, a fé vem pelo ouvir e ouvir pela palavra de Deus . ), sua nova vida está basicamente envolvida na fé; fé em Deus e fé na Palavra de Deus (2 Coríntios 5: 7 (Porque andamos pela fé , não pela vista :) ! O crente então (ou pelo menos) deve ter o desejo de memorizar a Palavra de Deus para não pecar contra Ele (Salmo 119: 11 Tua palavra escondi em meu coração, para não pecar contra ti . ). Eles tomam a Sua Palavra como um conforto quando o mundo se opõe a eles (Salmo 119: 42 Então terei o que responder àquele que me afronta: pois confio na Tua palavra. ) E permitem que a Sua Palavra os guie enquanto caminham este mundo obscurecido pelo pecado amaldiçoado (Salmo 119: 105 Tua palavra é uma lâmpada para os meus pés e uma luz para o meu caminho ). Com essas coisas em mente, eu pergunto: é, portanto, importante se a Palavra de Deus é completa e totalmente verdadeira ou simplesmente provisória? A maioria diria que sim, é muito importante que a Palavra de Deus seja completa e, nisso, também é totalmente verdadeira. Como outro escreveu. Como podemos ter certeza de que tudo na Bíblia é verdade? Como podemos ter certeza de que Jesus Cristo é quem disse ser, ou mesmo que existiu, se a Bíblia não é infalível? [1] Por inerrante entende-se sem erro ou engano.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Proofs of the New Testament, Suggest Peshitta Primacy – Part 1
    Historical Proofs of the New Testament, Suggest Peshitta Primacy – Part 1 Compiled by Christopher Lancaster I have discussed many of the linguistic proofs of Peshitta primacy, which is perhaps the best proof we can have, as it is internal evidence. There is however much external evidence also, such as quotes from Church fathers, and simple (yet little-known) facts about Jesus’ time (and language), that also make a strong case for Peshitta primacy. This article will deal with some historical proofs of Peshitta primacy, and will also touch on other issues, such as the Septuagint, and the other Aramaic Bible versions. 1. The Aramaic language Aramaic is an ancient Semitic language (very similar to Hebrew) that according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, became the dominant language of the Middle East, around 500-600 years before the birth of the Messiah. “Aramaic is thought to have first appeared among the Aramaeans about the late 11th century BC. By the 8th century BC it had become accepted by the Assyrians as a second language. The mass deportations of people by the Assyrians and the use of Aramaic as a lingua franca by Babylonian merchants served to spread the language, so that in the 7th and 6th centuries BC it gradually supplanted Akkadian as the lingua franca of the Middle East.” – Encyclopedia Britannica “The Persians used the Aramaic language because this tongue was the language of the two Semitic empires, the empire of Assyria and the empire of Babylon. Aramaic was so firmly established as the lingua franca that no government could dispense with its use as a vehicle of expression in a far-flung empire, especially in the western provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • New Testament Textual Criticism the Application of Thoroughgoing Principles
    New Testament Textual Criticism The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles Press SBL Supplements to Novum Testamentum Editors M. M. Mitchell D. P. Moessner Editorial Board L. Alexander, F. Bovon, C. Breytenbach J. K. Elliott, C. R. Holladay, M. J. J. Menken, J. Smit Sibinga, J. C. Thom, P. Trebilco Press Volume 137 SBL New Testament Textual Criticism The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles Essays on Manuscripts and Textual Variation J. K. Elliott Press SBL Press SBLAtlanta Copyright © 2010 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands This edition published under license from Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands by SBL Press. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, includ- ing photocopying and recording, or by any means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the Publisher. Requests for per- mission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Department, Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is grant- ed by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Elliott, J. K. (James Keith), author. New Testament textual criticism : the application of thoroughgoing principles / by J.K. Elliott. pages cm — (Supplements to Novum Testamentum ; volume 137) ISBN 978-1-62837-028-7 (paper binding : alk.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Orthodox Bible : New Testament
    THE EASTERN - GREEK ORTHODOX BIBLE : NEW TESTAMENT Presented to Presented by Date – Occasion THE EASTERN - GREEK ORTHODOX BIBLE NEW TESTAMENT THE EASTERN / GREEK ORTHODOX BIBLE BASED ON THE SEPTUAGINT AND THE PATRIARCHAL TEXT NEW TESTAMENT ALSO KNOWN AS THE CHRISTIAN GREEK SCRIPTURES With extensive introductory and supplemental material The EOB New Testament is presented in memory of Archbishop Vsevolod of Scopelos (†2007) Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople And in honor of His Beatitude Metropolitan Jonah Primate of the Orthodox Church in America ABBREVIATIONS AND CODES Indicates words added for clarity and accuracy but which may not [ ] be in the Greek text. For public reading, these words can be included or skipped Indicates words added for theological clarity and accuracy. For { } public reading, these words should be skipped Indicates words that may have been added in the Byzantine textual tradition for the purpose of clarification, harmonization or liturgical < > use and which are present in the PT, but which may not have been part of the original manuscripts ANF/PNF Ante-Nicene Fathers / Post-Nicene Fathers BAC Being as Communion, John Zizioulas CCC Catechism of the Catholic Church Modern “eclectic” texts or reconstructed "critical texts" (United CT Bible Societies Text (UBS) or the Nestle-Aland Text (NA)) CTC Called to Communion, Joseph Ratzinger EBC Eucharist, Bishop, Church, John Zizioulas EOB Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible HBB His Broken Body, Laurent Cleenewerck HE Ecclesiastical History (Eusebius) (Paul Maier’s edition) KJV King James Version (sometimes called Authorized Version) Greek translation of the Old Testament known as the Septuagint LXX which is the basis for the main English text of the EOB/OT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION ABBREVIATIONS AND CODES ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus' Latin New Testament
    A Most Perilous Journey ERASMUS’ GREEK NEW TESTAMENT AT 500 YEARS CURATED BY RICHARD M. ADAMS, JR. JULY 15, 2016 — SEPT 15, 2016 PITTS THEOLOGY LIBRARY 1 A Most Perilous Journey: Erasmus’ Greek New Testament at 500 Years “I have edited the New Five hundred years ago, the great Dutch humanist Desiderius Erasmus Testament, and much of Rotterdam (1466-1536) published the first Greek New Testament besides; and in order to and a new Latin translation, a landmark event in the development do a service to the reading of the Bible and a sign of the emphasis on returning ad fontes (“to public I have thought the sources”) that characterized developing reforms of the church. nothing of a most perilous This exhibit celebrates the milestone by displaying all five editions of journey, nothing of the Erasmus’ Greek New Testament produced during his lifetime, allowing expense, nothing at all of visitors to trace how the text changed over the decades of Erasmus’ the toils in which I have work. Alongside these rare Erasmus editions, items in the exhibit worn out a great part of highlight the changing form of the Bible in the sixteenth century my health and life itself.” and the development of Erasmus as a scholar and his philological and theological work in this critical time of reform. In response to receiving Erasmus’ first edition of the Greek New Testament, his friend John Colet (1466-1519), Dean at St. Paul’s Cathedral, wrote, “The name of Erasmus shall never perish.” We welcome you to this exhibit, celebrating the fact that after 500 years the sentiment remains strong.
    [Show full text]