The History and Future of TV Election Debates in the UK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History and Future of TV Election Debates in the UK Ric Bailey's expert dissection of the first campaign debates among party leaders in REPORT the United Kingdom is a first-rate piece of analysis on an important, frequently misunderstood topic. Accessibly written and exhaustively researched, Squeezing Out the Oxygen- or Reviving Democracy? offers a unique, behind-the-scenes perspective on the 2010 Cameron-Clegg-Brown joint appearances, along with a broader consideration of the role of TV debates in British politics. This is a book that scholars of political communication will be citing for decades to come. Professor Alan Schroeder School of Journalism, Northeastern University, Boston Squeezing Out the Oxygen – or Reviving Author of Presidential Debates: 50 Years of High-Risk TV (Columbia University Press) Democracy? 2010 saw the first UK television debates between the party leaders. What was their e History and Future of TV Election Debates in the UK significance? Did they affect the result? What are the lessons for the future? In this finely written account, Ric Bailey, with the benefit of his BBC experience, offers an authoritative account which should be read not only by the politicians and the pundits but by all those seeking to make sense of democracy in Britain today. Professor Vernon Bogdanor CBE, FBA Ric Bailey Research Professor, Institute for Contemporary History, Kings College, London Author of The Coalition and the Constitution February 2012 Britain's Conservative Party leader Cameron, Liberal Democrat leader Clegg and PM Brown take part in the third and final televised party leaders' debate in Birmingham ©JEFF OVERS/BBC SELECTED RISJ PUBLICATIONS James Painter Poles Apart. The international reporting of climate scepticism Lara Fielden Regulating for Trust in Journalism. Standards regulation in the age of blended media Published in association with City University David A. L. Levy and Robert G. Picard (eds) Is there a better structure for News Providers? The potential in charitable and trust ownership David A. L. Levy and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (eds) The Changing Business of Journalism and its implication for Democracy Tim Gardam and David A. L. Levy (eds) The Price of Plurality: choice, diversity and broadcasting institutions in the digital age published in association with Ofcom John Lloyd and Julia Hobsbawm The Power of the Commentariat published in association with Editorial Intelligence Ltd CHALLENGES Paolo Mancini Between Commodification and Lifestyle Politics. Is Silvio Berlusconi a new model of poltics for the 21st century? John Lloyd Scandal! News International and the Rights of Journalism Stephen Coleman (ed) Leaders in the Living Room. The Prime Ministerial debates of 2010: evidence, evaluation and some recommendations Richard Sambrook Are Foreign Correspondents Redundant? The changing face of international news James Painter Summoned by Science: reporting climate change at Copenhagen and beyond John Kelly Red Kayaks and Hidden Gold: the rise, challenges and value of citizen journalism Stephen Whittle and Glenda Cooper Privacy, Probity and Public Interest Stephen Coleman, Scott Anthony, David E Morrison Public Trust in the News: a constructivist study of the social life of the news Nik Gowing ‘Skyful of Lies’ and Black Swans: the new tyranny of shifting information power in crises Andrew Currah What’s Happening to Our News: an investigation into the likely impact of the digital revolution on the economics of news publishing in the UK James Painter Counter-Hegemonic News: a case study of Al-Jazeera English and Telesur Floriana Fossato and John Lloyd with Alexander Verkhovsky The Web that Failed: how opposition politics and independent initiatives are failing on the internet in Russia About the Author As the BBC’s Chief Political Adviser, Ric Bailey works with programme- makers and management to ensure political impartiality and independence across the Corporation as well as advising on other aspects of editorial policy. He liaises with political parties and government, oversees the BBC’s approach to elections and organises for the industry the UK’s system of party political broadcasts. He represented the BBC on the negotiating team which set up the 2010 Prime Ministerial Debates, winning a Royal Television Society Journalism Award jointly with Sky and ITV. Ric was a lobby journalist for BBC TV and radio before becoming Political News Editor at BBC Westminster. He edited the BBC’s Handbook Guide to the 1997 General Election. For six years from 2000 he was Executive Editor of the flagship BBC One political debate programme Question Time, including editions in China, Russia, the US and the Middle East, also setting up a long-running citizenship scheme for young people, Schools Question Time. Born in Manchester, Ric has a degree in Modern History and Politics from Southampton University and a post graduate diploma in broadcast journalism from the City University in London. He joined BBC local radio in 1982, winning a Sony Gold Radio Award for a programme on the miners’ strike. He now lives in Hertfordshire and is married with three children. Acknowledgements It is not just the direct support and encouragement which James Painter and Dr David Levy offer to each Reuters Fellow, myself included, which deserves genuine thanks. They also create an environment at the Institute which promotes stimulating discussion and friendly camaraderie. So the thanks must be extended not only to the excellent RISJ staff, but in many cases to their families too, who are so welcoming and hospitable – and, of course, to the other Reuters Fellows of 2010–11. I’m also very grateful to colleagues at the BBC: David Jordan for supporting the Fellowship and allowing time away from the office; to him, Sue Inglish, and ITV’s Mike Jermey for checking the draft for anything inappropriate; to Phil Abrams and David Cowling at the BBC and Tom Bailey of St Edmund Hall for unleashing their close critical scrutiny – though none of them bear responsibility for any surviving howlers. I am especially grateful to Professor Vernon Bogdanor, who offered far more suggestions, encouragement, and lunch than his role of supervisor warranted. Most of all, I thank my family for their support – in particular, my wife Joni, whose idea it was to apply for the fellowship and who gave constant encouragement throughout. Published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 1 Contents Executive Summary Preface Introduction 1. Why there were no TV debates in the UK for fifty years 1.1. Too Trivial, Too American 1.2. Dusty Pipes, Political Cobwebs 1.3. Grammar School Premiers – With No Debating Society 1.4. Tempting – But a Loser’s Trick 1.5. ‘Missed Opportunity of Epic Proportions’ 1.6. ‘Nothing in it for us’ 2. How debates happened in 2010. 2.1. Still Not America … 2.2. Empty Chairs, Changing Games 2.3. Keeping it Simple 2.4. Round a Table at Last 2.5. What Made 2010 Different 3. Are TV election debates right for the UK? 3.1. Squeezing the Campaign Air 3.2. Voters’ Verdict 3.3. Game versus Substance 3.4. So What was Lost? 3.5. The UK ‘Presidency’ 3.6. ‘Simon Cowellisation’ 4. Will the UK have TV election debates next time? 4.1. ‘Different Political Chemistry’? 4.2. Same Old Hazards . and Some New Ones 4.3. Can Debates Lose the Election? 4.4. Will they? Won’t they? 5. Conclusion Bibliography Acknowledgements 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The future of TV election debates in the UK cannot be taken for granted, even though there is strong evidence that, in 2010, they increased the interest and involvement of voters – especially the young and the normally less engaged. Although the expectations, not only of the electorate but also of supporters and opponents alike, are that such debates are now here to stay, many of the hurdles – which left Britain as one of the last democratic countries in the world to introduce them – remain in place, with some new added complications. Analysis of the twelve British general election campaigns after the 1960 US presidential encounter between Nixon and Kennedy point to a clear pattern of why they did not happen in the UK for fifty years, despite the fact that all the major parties – albeit at different times – spoke up in favour. Though, in public, the reluctant party leaders cited largely constitutional reasons – in particular, that debates are not appropriate for a non-presidential parliamentary system of government – their more candid considerations focused squarely on political self-interest. Either incumbency or a substantial opinion poll lead – or both – always meant agreeing to debates presented too high a risk for one or other of the parties. This pattern was only broken in 2010 because – for once – both the largest UK political parties concluded there was electoral advantage in debates and – also for the first time – the main broadcasters worked closely together to overcome the significant practical obstacles. So although the political cost of veto-ing future debates may now be higher, the real difficulties in repeating what were widely, though not universally, acknowledged as a successful innovation, may prove to be no less challenging than they were for the previous half century. The new Westminster context of coalition government is only the most obvious of the changed circumstances which risk the immediate future of debates, as political parties each assess the impact on their electoral prospects. International experience – including from the United States – suggests that just because debates have happened once, it is far from certain they will be here next time round. Meanwhile, the debate about debates – between those who argue that they “squeezed the oxygen” from the 2010 campaign and those who claim they invigorated democratic engagement within key parts of the electorate – is likely to continue. Proponents of debates will have to keep reminding the political establishment and voters, as well as some academic and media sceptics, that – for a short while at least in 2010 – apathy towards politics seemed to have met its match in enthusiasm for the UK’s first televised election debates.
Recommended publications
  • James Thomson CV
    James Thomson Sound Recordist / mixer e-mail: [email protected] mobile: + 44 (0)7711 031 615 Nationality: Canadian and British passports ( no I Visa required for working in the USA ) Bases: West Hampstead, London & Clifton, Bristol Languages: English / conversational French Diary service: Jane Murch at Films at 59 + 44 ( 0)117 906 4334 Credits - Documentary Fred and Rose West the Untold Story - Blink Films for ITV Studios, directed by Adam Kaleta Drive to Survive F1 - Box to Box Productions for Netflix TV, directed by James Gay-Rees Push the Global Housing Crisis - WG Films / Malmo Inc for Netflix TV, directed by Fredrik Gertten The English Surgeon - Storyville for BBC TV, directed by Geoffrey Smith with music by Nick Cave Keith Richards X-Pensive Winos - Main Offender Tour, directed by the late Roger Pomphrey The Musicals - with Neil Brand, 3 X 1hrs for BBC 4, directed by Sebastian Barfield Sachin A Billion Dreams - docudrama Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, directed by James Erskine The Murder Detectives - Films of Record Productions for Channel 4, directed by Bart Corpe Britain and the Sea - with David Dimbleby BBC TV, directed by John Hodgson Nazi Mega Stuctures - Darlow-Smithson for Nat Geo, directed by Simon Breen All Change at Longleat - Shine Productions, BBC 1, directed by Lynn Alleyway Origins of Us - with Dr. Alice Roberts, BBC TV, directed by David Stewart A Picture of Britain – with David Dimbleby BBC TV, directed by Jonty Claypool Magritte - The life of surrealist painter Rene Magritte for Channel 4, directed by Michael Burke Omnibus - Bernardo Bertolucci & ‘The Dreamers’, BBC TV, directed by David Thompson Race Across America with James Cracknell for Discovery USA, directed by Andrew Barron The Great British Paraorchestra for Channel 4, directed by Cesca Eaton The Vanishing Family - Channel 4, directed by Richard Bond D-Day - Dangerous Productions for BBC TV, directed by Richard Dale James May’s 20th Century, BBC TV, directed by Helen Thomas Churchill’s Forgotten Years – BBC TV, directed by Russell Barnes Ultimate Swarms with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Brexit: Hanover’S Business Advisory
    Navigating Brexit: Hanover’s Business Advisory CHARLES LEWINGTON, MANAGING DIRECTOR Charles is the founder and Managing Director of Hanover. Formerly Press Secretary to Prime –What are the consequences of Brexit and how will it impact your business? Minister John Major, Charles provides strategic counsel to CEOs of UK businesses and the UK –How will you reassure investors, staff and your supply chain? Directors of overseas businesses with substantial British operations –Who should you be engaging with during new negotiations with the EU CHRISTIAN HIERHOLZER, and what should you be saying? MANAGING DIRECTOR, BRUSSELS Christian provides high-level strategic advice –How do you keep abreast of the dramatic daily events in London and Brussels? to clients across a variety of sectors and policy areas . Christian started his 12-year career in EU affairs as policy adviser to Karl-Heinz Florenz, former chair of the European Parliament’s Environment Committee. STEVE RICHARDS, SENIOR ADVISER A distinguished broadcaster and columnist, Steve provides political, media and policy The UK vote to leave the European Union has caused economic analysis for Hanover’s clients. He writes for The Independent, Guardian, Times and uncertainty and political turmoil. Whilst for many it is business as Financial Times and presents BBC Radio 4’s usual until Article 50 is formally enacted, it is very unclear what new The Week in Westminster. LAURA SWIRE, DIRECTOR, ADVOCACY arrangement with the EU will be put in its place. Will it be EEA Plus; Laura leads Hanover’s advocacy team providing EEA Minus or a straight WTO deal? strategic counsel on political and regulatory environments, reputation management and campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • Future for Local and Regional Media
    House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Future for local and regional media Fourth Report of Session 2009–10 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 March 2010 HC 43-II (Incorporating HC 699-i-iv of Session 2008-09) Published on 6 April 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon and East Chelmsford) (Chair) Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP (Labour, Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mr Mike Hall MP (Labour, Weaver Vale) Alan Keen MP (Labour, Feltham and Heston) Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Adam Price MP (Plaid Cymru, Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Tom Watson MP (Labour, West Bromwich East) The following members were also members of the committee during the inquiry: Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Helen Southworth MP (Labour, Warrington South) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lobby in Transition: What the 2009 Mps’ Expenses Scandal Revealed About the Changing Relationship Between Politicians and the Westminster Lobby?
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Gaber, I. (2013). The Lobby in transition: what the 2009 MPs’ expenses scandal revealed about the changing relationship between politicians and the Westminster Lobby?. Media History, 19(1), pp. 45-58. doi: 10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 This is the published version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/18258/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Media History ISSN: 1368-8804 (Print) 1469-9729 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cmeh20 THE LOBBY IN TRANSITION Ivor Gaber To cite this article: Ivor Gaber (2013) THE LOBBY IN TRANSITION, Media History, 19:1, 45-58, DOI: 10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 © 2013 Taylor & Francis Published online: 11 Jan 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Piers Morgan Outrage Over Brandpool Celebrity Trust Survey Submitted By: Friday's Media Group Monday, 19 April 2010
    Piers Morgan outrage over Brandpool celebrity trust survey Submitted by: Friday's Media Group Monday, 19 April 2010 Piers Morgan has expressed outrage at being voted the sixth least trusted celebrity brand ambassador in a survey by ad agency and creative content providers Brandpool. Writing in his Mail On Sunday column, the Britain’s Got Talent judge questioned the logic of the poll, which named the celebrities the public would most and least trust as the faces of an ad campaign. But Brandpool has hit back at Morgan for failing to recognise the purpose of its research. Morgan, who also neglected to credit Brandpool as the source of the study, said: “No real surprises on the Most Trusted list, which is led by ‘national treasures’ such as David Attenborough, Stephen Fry, Richard Branson and Michael Parkinson. “As for the Least Trusted list, I find the logic of this one quite odd. Katie Price, for example, comes top, yet I would argue that she’s one of the most trustworthy people I know… Then I suddenly pop up at No 6, an outrage which perhaps only I feel incensed about. Particularly as that smiley little rodent Russell Brand slithers in at No 7. Making me supposedly less trustworthy than a former heroin junkie and sex addict.” Morgan was also surprised to see Simon Cowell, Cheryl Cole, Sharon Osbourne, Tom Cruise and Jonathan Ross in the Least Trusted list. However, he agreed with the inclusion of John Terry, Ashley Cole, Tiger Woods and Tony Blair, all of whom, he said, were “united by a common forked tongue”.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Clinton Email November Release
    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772613 Date: 11/30/2015 RELEASE IN FULL CONFIDENTIAL October 9, 2010 For: Hillary From: Sid Re: Yes, some things: 1. Richard Wolff told me that one of the reasons Jones was summarily executed was payback for dumping Mark Lippert (whom he called "Thing Two," from Dr. Seuss' Cat in the Hat), McDonough's sidekick (whom Jones calls "Thing One"). Of course, Jones had to go to Obama himself to dispose of Lippert. The true cause was that Thing One and Thing Two were leaking negative stories about Jones. McDonough, naturally, has assumed Donilon's post. Obladi, oblada, as John Lennon (who would have been 70) might say. 2. Shaun Woodward is in the Labour shadow cabinet in his former position as Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. Gordon Brown's hatchetman, Charlie Whelan, whose job was to undercut Tony, had worked the unions to vote for Ed Miliband rather than Ed Balls (the one closest to Gordon) in order to beat David--the last scene in the revenge tragedy of Gordon v. Tony. Only 19 percent of the union people voted, but were credited with the full one-third of Labour votes for leader selection, so a minority of a minority threw the election by 1.3 percent to Ed. Then Balls, his wife Yvette Cooper (an MP and former cabinet secretary), and other Brownites ran as a slate for shadow cabinet--the first time the shadow cabinet was to be elected by the constituency. That succeeded to electing them all and shutting out Peter Hain, the former deputy PM, as well as Shaun.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair Of
    Nov. 19 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 your home. Through the last century and and British servicemembers are sacrificing into our own, Americans have appreciated in a necessary and noble cause. Once again, the friendship of your people. And we are we are acting to secure the peace of the grateful for your personal commitment world. across five decades to the health and vitality The bonds between our countries were of the alliance between our nations. formed in hard experience. We passed Of course, things didn’t start out too through great adversity together. We have well. [Laughter] Yet, even at America’s risen through great challenges together. founding, our nations shared a basic belief The mutual respect and fellowship between in human liberty. That conviction more our countries is deep and strong and per- than anything else led to our reconciliation. manent. And in time, our shared commitment to Let us raise our glasses to our common freedom became the basis of a great Atlan- ideals, to our enduring friendships, to the tic alliance that defeated tyranny in Europe preservation of our liberties, and to Her and saved the liberty of the world. Majesty, the Queen of the United Kingdom The story of liberty, the story of the of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Magna Carta and the Declaration of Inde- pendence, continues in our time. The NOTE: The President spoke at 8:49 p.m. in power of freedom has touched Asia and the Ballroom at Buckingham Palace. In his Latin America and Africa and beyond. And remarks, he referred to Prince Philip, Duke now our two countries are carrying out a of Edinburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Particularitiesof Tony Blair' Governments'foreign Policy Decision
    Максим Прихненко . Особливості механізму прийняття зовнішньополітичних рішень … 321 Історико -політичні проблеми сучасного світу : Modern Historical and Political Issues: Збірник наукових статей . – Чернівці : Journal in Historical & Political Sciences. – Chernivtsi: Чернівецький національний університет , Chernivtsi National University, 2016. – Т. 33-34. – С. 321-327 2016. – Volume. 33-34. – pp. 321-327 УДК : 32-327(410) © Максим Прихненко 1 Особливості механізму прийняття зовнішньополітичних рішень в урядах Тоні Блера В статті системно проаналізовано модель прийняття зовнішньополітичних рішень , а також ключові фактори , які впливали на формування та впровадження цих рішень у зовнішньополіти- чний курс Великобританії у якості складової частини загальної моделі лідерства Тоні Блера . Ключові слова Модель лідерства , механізм прийняття рішень , блеризм . Particularitiesof Tony Blair’ governments’foreign policy decision-making process The present article is devoted to the problem of particularities of Tony Blair’ governments’ foreign policy decision-making process. The aim of the paper is to analyze the decision-making model formed by Tony Blair as well as to identify key factors which impacted the process of creation and implemen- tation of foreign policy decisions in the framework of Tony Blair’ leadership model. It was concluded that Tony Blair had formed tree level decision-making system. Rolls of the Parliament and the Gov- ernment in the deliberation process were frustrated. On the other hand, special advisers and so called selective committees impacts were strengthened. This institutes played the role of consulting bodies on specific issues of the agenda. Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs were the driving force of all process. But usually the second one was like the executor of Prime Minister’ decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cranbury Vol
    THE CRANBURY VOL. XXI. CRANBURY, N. J., FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1905. NO. 5 AT THE SIGN OF' THE SPAtJE. I1 Non" Mr. tenrey. Recording to his tnis ttiere wns ecncrnl linud- I llghtH, really meant to bo kind, but ho blinking, nnd a buffet luncheon wan ST JOB!! YAKCK CHXHKT- committed an alarming indiscretion EACE TREATY served In the cafe ncross the ball, tuc NEW JERSEYJTATEIDR O» aad on, in inn and sbndr, when, undeterred by his previous re- Itusslr.nK nnd Jnpnuesc inforinnlly drinking each other's hcnltb. Shortly Millions In Woman's Will. WASHINGTON. •, - Fooling over flat and grade, buff, he passed hi; arm coolly through It wns announced in Pnlcrson by the King and beggar, fo<. tnd friend, before 0 o'clock tbe Rmslnu mission official- appraiser thnt the cslrttc of President Roosevelt bnn demanded Come, at lost, lo the journey's end; Mcllnda's and fried to turn her steps left tbe ynrd for the tbrinksKlvIng ser- tho reslRiiatlou of F, TV. Palmer, Pub- otop naT) and maid In the direction of the river. IS SIGNED Mrs. Mary E. Ryle, who wiin known vice nt Christ Church, nlid thu Japan- • . At tie Sign of the Spade. lic Printer. In an instant she flung around" on ese returned to the hotel. throughout, tbe State of New Jersey for her philanthropy, wait valued nt •From Consul-Geiicrnl Rodgeni. n» •Sage'or rany, >lave or blade. him, with a burning tide of blood rush- THE SULTAN'S LOVE OF THE mnselor hnd been giving a lesson on *3.'i03,075.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics: Pre-University Reading
    Year 13 Politics Students – reading, listening and viewing to keep you entertained and informed Please see the last page for details of an exciting competition! Books: Yuval Harari - 21 Lessons for the 21st Century – from the author of the superb history bestseller, “Sapiens”. This book looks at the present and the future. “There is surely no one alive who is better at explaining our world than Yuval Noah Harari - he is the lecturer we all wish we’d had at university. Reading this book, I must have interrupted my partner a hundred times to pass on fascinating things I’d just read.” Adam Kaye Owen Jones – “The Establishment” – “Behind our democracy lurks a powerful but unaccountable network of people who wield massive power and reap huge profits in the process.” Hardly impartial, but an interesting viewpoint. Tim Marshall – “Prisoners of Geography - Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need to Know About Global Politics” - "A fresh and original insight into the geopolitics behind today's foreign policy challenges" - Andrew Neil Steve Richards - The Prime Ministers – A landmark history of the men and women who have defined the UK's role in the modern world - and what makes them special - by a seasoned political journalist. Michael Lewis – “The Fifth Risk” – Michael Lewis, author of the Big Short and Moneyball, looks at events in the US after the election of Donald Trump. “Michael Lewis reveals the combustible cocktail of wilful ignorance and venality that is fuelling the destruction of a country's fabric.” Peter Frankopan – “The New Silk Roads” – a look at the interconnected world and the recent eastwards shift in power.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Curious Mind. Be Part of It
    For the curious mind. Be part of it. ProsPect – good writing about the things that matter Prospect breaks the mould of modern-day journalism. it covers a broad range of topics from current affairs to culture and business to science and technology. every month Prospect combines elegant design with a strikingly original mix of essays, opinion, debate and reviews. What sets it apart is its intellectual depth. Each issue brings together the sharpest minds to unravel the complexities of events and ideas that define the modern world. Politically, Prospect is neither left nor right. Its views are those of its opinionated mix of editors and contributors who write for an audience keen to participate in the debate, but who will ultimately make up their own mind. The result is an entertaining, informative and open minded magazine that mixes compelling argument and clear headed analysis with an international style. ❝Prospect offers intellectual discovery when everything else is going in the opposite direction.❞ david goodhart, editor, prospect. our editorial Prospect is britain’s foremost monthly commentary on current affairs, epitomising long-form journalism at its best. Features Nothing is off limits to our feature writers. What is certain is that this section combines breadth of coverage with thoughtful, unpredictable and eclectic comment. This is in-depth reading at its best – probing to awaken the curious mind. opinions Thought provoking, often intellectual, always surprising, these articles are written by leading thinkers and opinion formers. science and technology things to do this month The story behind the headlines, across a Our pick of what to see and do this month – mix of subjects, from hard sciences through from the popular to the obscure, this new section consumer technology and media.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Bulletin Issue Number 45
    * Ofcom broadcast bulletin Issue number 45 10 October 2005 Ofcom broadcast bulletin 45 10 October 2005 Contents Introduction 3 Standards cases In Breach 4 Resolved 8 Other programmes not in breach/outside remit 11 2 Ofcom broadcast bulletin 45 10 October 2005 Introduction Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code took effect on 25 July 2005 (with the exception of Rule 10.17 which came into effect on 1 July 2005). This Code is used to assess the compliance of all programmes broadcast on or after 25 July 2005. The Broadcasting Code can be found at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/bcode/ The Rules on the Amount and Distribution of Advertising (RADA) apply to advertising issues within Ofcom’s remit from 25 July 2005. The Rules can be found at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/advertising/#content The Communications Act 2003 allowed for the codes of the legacy regulators to remain in force until such time as Ofcom developed its own Code. While Ofcom has now published its Broadcasting Code, the following legacy Codes apply to content broadcast before 25 July 2005. • Advertising and Sponsorship Code (Radio Authority) • News & Current Affairs Code and Programme Code (Radio Authority) • Code on Standards (Broadcasting Standards Commission) • Code on Fairness and Privacy (Broadcasting Standards Commission) • Programme Code (Independent Television Commission) • Programme Sponsorship Code (Independent Television Commission) • Rules on the Amount and Distribution of Advertising From time to time adjudications relating to advertising content may appear in the bulletin in relation to areas of advertising regulation which remain with Ofcom (including the application of statutory sanctions by Ofcom).
    [Show full text]