For the Curious Mind. Be Part of It
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Progressive Nationalism Citizenship and the Left
As ties of religion, class and ethnicity weaken, national identity may be the best way to preserve the Left’s collective ideals… Progressive Nationalism Citizenship and the Left David Goodhart About Demos Who we are Demos is the think tank for everyday democracy. We believe everyone should be able to make personal choices in their daily lives that contribute to the common good. Our aim is to put this democratic idea into practice by working with organisations in ways that make them more effective and legitimate. What we work on We focus on six areas: public services; science and technology; cities and public space; people and communities; arts and culture; and global security. Who we work with Our partners include policy-makers, companies, public service providers and social entrepreneurs. Demos is not linked to any party but we work with politicians across political divides. Our international network – which extends across Eastern Europe, Scandinavia, Australia, Brazil, India and China – provides a global perspective and enables us to work across borders. How we work Demos knows the importance of learning from experience. We test and improve our ideas in practice by working with people who can make change happen. Our collaborative approach means that our partners share in the creation and ownership of new ideas. What we offer We analyse social and political change, which we connect to innovation and learning in organisations.We help our partners show thought leadership and respond to emerging policy challenges. How we communicate As an independent voice, we can create debates that lead to real change.We use the media, public events, workshops and publications to communicate our ideas. -
The Latest Version of the PM - Brown with Added Blair
The latest version of the PM - Brown with added Blair Suddenly, all the major political leaders are sounding like ardent Blairites. Even the man previously known as the Anti-Blair Andrew Rawnsley The Observer, Sunday February 10. 2008 One of our most senior politicians - to spare his blushes, let's call him Mr X - went to his doctor recently complaining of severe stomach pains. The GP sent him off to one of London's better regarded hospitals for an endoscopy. I've not had the pleasure myself, but those who have endured this procedure tell me that it is not the nicest way to spend your day, having a flexible tube with a camera on its snout stuck down your throat or up your rectum. Unless you are a masochist, it is certainly not a procedure you would want to repeat more times than you absolutely had to. Mr X waited some weeks for his appointment. He then had to wait some further weeks to hear from the hospital. When he made inquiries, the hospital told him that - whoops - it had lost his results. This confronted him with the choice of going back on the waiting list for another endoscopy or making other arrangements. He made - and who can blame him? - other arrangements. You could say that this is a story with a satisfyingly egalitarian moral. The NHS can be as hopeless when it is treating a very important person as it can be when it is dealing with an ordinary patient. But it leaves me alarmed. If a hospital can be so careless with a very well- known Member of Parliament, it is likely to be sloppier still when it comes to the average voter who does not have the same opportunities to raise his or her voice in protest. -
2 MB 9Th Apr 2021 BBC Ideas Full Report [Final]
BBC IDEAS 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... 5 PART ONE: MONITORING STATISTICS ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 The BBC and its Charter Responsibilities on ‘Impartiality’ and ‘Distinctiveness’ ................................ 7 1.2 BBC Ideas ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 News-watch ................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.5 The Full Sample ............................................................................................................................................ 14 1.6 Views per Day .............................................................................................................................................. 15 1.7 Presentational style .................................................................................................................................... -
An Archive of Media References to the Cameron Personal Narrative, And
An archive of media references to the Cameron personal narrative and his repositioning of the Conservative party in his first 100 days as Conservative Party leader. (km, 12.4.06 version) David Cameron, it is very widely agreed, is repositioning/rebranding the Conservative Party, i. e. presenting a changed identity of it to the UK electorate. He is doing this in the light of where the Tories’ political competition is in terms of policy and personality. Also doing it because the Tories lost power in 1997 and have failed in two general elections to win it back. Below are 17 media references which are offered as instances of the rebranding exercise. Those references are interpreted by category afterwards. The term ‘branding’ has its origins in marketing for products, and from there it migrated to the promotion of corporate bodies in business, public and voluntary sectors. If this note was written in 1997, ‘repositioning’ would have been used to describe the process in hand, but now it has an outdated air in the face of the continuous intrusion of market behaviour into all aspects of public life. References 11.12.05 – The Observer, p. 19, carries a page entitled the ‘The Cameron Phenomenon’ with pics showing the new leader on his bike; buying milk; tieless on a bridge with an environmentalist. Cameron was elected party leader on December 6. The headline for the accompanying article by Ned Temko is ‘Within minutes of victory Cameron’s camp set in motion a tightly organised timetable’ 1.1.06 – The national papers carry a page advert from the Conservatives headlined ‘The world is changing . -
Blair's Britain
Blair’s Britain: the social & cultural legacy Social and cultural trends in Britain 1997-2007 and what they mean for the future the social & cultural legacy Ben Marshall, Bobby Duffy, Julian Thompson, Sarah Castell and Suzanne Hall Blair’s Britain: 1 Blair’s Britain: the social & cultural legacy Social and cultural trends in Britain 1997-2007 and what they mean for the future Ben Marshall, Bobby Duffy, Julian Thompson, Sarah Castell and Suzanne Hall 2. The making of Blair’s Britain Contents Foreword 2 Summary 3 1. Introduction 8 Ipsos MORI’s evidence base 8 From data to insight 9 2. The making of Blair’s Britain 12 Before Blair 12 Blair, Labour and Britain 13 Brown takes over 15 3. Blair’s Britain, 1997-2007 18 Wealth, inequality and consumerism 18 Ethical consumerism, well-being and health 24 Public priorities, public services 31 People, communities and places 36 Crime, security and identity 43 ‘Spin’ and the trust deficit 48 Technology and media 51 Sport, celebrity and other pastimes 54 Summary: Britain then and now 56 4. Brown’s Britain: now and next 60 From understanding to action 60 Describing culture through opposites 60 Mapping oppositions 65 Summary: what next? 70 Endnotes 72 the social & cultural legacy Blair’s Britain: Foreword There are many voices and perspectives in Britain at the end of the Blair era. Some of these say the British glass is half full, others that it is half empty. Take the National Health Service as an example. By almost every indicator, ask any expert, there is no doubt things are very much better. -
Give and Take: How Conservatives Think About Welfare
How conservatives think about w elfare Ryan Shorthouse and David Kirkby GIVE AND TAKE How conservatives think about welfare Ryan Shorthouse and David Kirkby The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. Bright Blue is an independent think tank and pressure group for liberal conservatism. Bright Blue takes complete responsibility for the views expressed in this publication, and these do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Director: Ryan Shorthouse Chair: Matthew d’Ancona Members of the board: Diane Banks, Philip Clarke, Alexandra Jezeph, Rachel Johnson First published in Great Britain in 2014 by Bright Blue Campaign ISBN: 978-1-911128-02-1 www.brightblue.org.uk Copyright © Bright Blue Campaign, 2014 Contents About the authors 4 Acknowledgements 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction 19 2 Methodology 29 3 How conservatives think about benefit claimants 34 4 How conservatives think about the purpose of welfare 53 5 How conservatives think about the sources of welfare 66 6 Variation amongst conservatives 81 7 Policies to improve the welfare system 96 Annex one: Roundtable attendee list 112 Annex two: Polling questions 113 Annex three: Questions and metrics used for social and economic conservative classification 121 About the authors Ryan Shorthouse Ryan is the Founder and Director of Bright Blue. -
Lower Sixth Transition Booklet (2017-18)
LOWER SIXTH TRANSITION BOOKLET (2017-18) GCSE Results and Induction Day 2 Sixth Form Dress Code 2017-18 Sixth Form pupils are role models for younger pupils - as such the school expects high standards of dress. The Sixth Form should be smartly dressed in a manner that would result in them being taken seriously within a professional working environment. Pupils’ appearance should reflect a sense of pride in themselves and of the school. Pupils may choose to wear either the trouser suit or skirt suit option. Trouser suit option: Conventional business suit (matching jacket and full-length trousers) Smart collared shirt of conventional design – long enough to be tucked in and large enough for the top button to be done up Smart tie; either school or alternative discreet design Smart conventional shoes/ankle boots – black or brown, polishable or smart clean suede. No high heels V-necked jumper or cardigan of any plain colour with no large logo (any tie must be visible) Modest jewellery Skirt suit option: Conventional business suit (matching jacket and skirt) - skirt should touch calf at the back with leg bent at 90 degree angle Smart collared shirt of conventional design – long enough to be tucked in Plain tights if worn Smart conventional shoes/ankle boots – black or brown, polishable or smart clean suede. No high heels V-necked jumper or cardigan of any plain colour with no large logo Modest jewellery Travel to and from School Any sensible coat or jacket may be worn over the suit for warmth and to keep dry on the way to School -
Eric Kaufmann Vitae
7/13/2010 Curriculum vitae Name: Dr. Eric Kaufmann Address: School of Politics and Sociology Birkbeck College, University of London Malet St., London, United Kingdom WC1E 7HX Telephone: 0208-874-4611 Email address: [email protected] Qualifications: PhD (Sept. 1994 - Nov. 1998) London School of Economics & Political Science London, U.K. Masters of Science (Sept. 1993 - Sept. 1994) London School of Economics & Political Science London, U.K. Bachelor of Arts (Sept. 1988 - Apr. 1991) University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Date of Birth: 11 May 1970 __________________________________________________________________________ Academic Posts Held • Reader in Politics and Sociology, Birkbeck College, University of London since 2007. Lecturer from October 2003 - 2006; Senior Lecturer 2006. Director of Masters Programme in Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict. • Fellow, Religion in International Affairs Initiative/International Security Program, Belfer Center, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2008-9 • Lecturer in Comparative Politics, University of Southampton, February 1999 - September 2003 Publication Record (accepted or in print) Books: 1 7/13/2010 1. Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth: Religion, Demography and Politics in the 21st Century, Profile Books, 25 March. - Reviewed in Sunday Times, Observer, FT, Literary Review, Independent, Telegraph (blog), New Humanist, Big Issue Scotland, London Metro, Toronto Globe and Mail, Morning Star, Sunday Star Times (New Zealand) and others. 2. Co-edited with Jack Goldstone and Monica Duffy Toft: Political Demography: identity, conflict and institutions (publisher: Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press, Dec 2010) 3. The Orange Order: A Contemporary Northern Irish History (Oxford University Press, 2007; paperback 2009) - Serialised in Belfast News Letter, 21 to 26 May 2007. -
45 Minutes from Doom! Tony Blair and the Radical Bible Rebranded." Harnessing Chaos: the Bible in English Political Discourse Since 1968
Crossley, James G. "45 Minutes from Doom! Tony Blair and the Radical Bible Rebranded." Harnessing Chaos: The Bible in English Political Discourse Since 1968. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, 2014. 210–241. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 24 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567659347.ch-008>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 24 September 2021, 12:09 UTC. Copyright © James G. Crossley 2014. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Chapter 8 45 MINUTES FROM DOOM! TONY BLAIR AND THE RADICAL BIBLE REBRANDED 1. Spiritual and Religious: The Political Theology of Tony Blair By the turn of the millennium, the Thatcher revolution in political think- ing was over, both in the sense that she was now a ¿gure often deemed ‘toxic’ and that the general tenets of Thatcherism had simultaneously been accepted by the main political parties and culturally normalised. Indeed, Thatcher famously claimed that her greatest legacy was New Labour. By the time Tony Blair (b. 1953) came to power in 1997, issues surrounding Christianity and the Bible had changed.1 Thatcher faced a Church of England prepared to confront her on issues of social justice, inner-city tensions, and welfare. After her third election victory in 1987, and the ¿nal stage of her embedding of Thatcherism, the Church shifted its attention more abstractly towards the worries about the perils of materialism. In the longer term, high-pro¿le concerns with poverty would become more internationally focused (e.g. -
Shuffling the Pack
SHUFFLING THE PACK A brief guide to government reshuffles Shuffling the Pack 1 Akash Paun Shuffling the Pack Introduction The reshuffle is one of the most potent weapons in the prime ministerial armoury – albeit one that can occasionally explode in the face of the person using it. Enacting legislation, implementing public service reform, or rooting out government waste can take months or years, with no guarantee of success. But on reshuffle day a prime minister, in principle, wields unlimited power. In practice, things can feel rather different, as prime ministers are confronted by a range of constraints. Even when a PM does formulate a bold plan to remould the cabinet, there is much that can and often does go wrong. Reshuffles also carry political risks for prime ministers, given the inevitable creation of enemies and disappointed allies on the backbenches. From a personal point of view, the reshuffle can be draining too: past leaders have described having to break the bad news as “a ghastly business” (Tony Blair),1 “the most distasteful...of all the tasks which fall to the lot of a prime minister” (Clement Attlee), and “something you have to grit your teeth to do” (Margaret Thatcher).2 Yet, perhaps surprisingly, most recent prime ministers have carried out reshuffles on a near annual basis, calculating that the political benefits can outweigh the risks and the sheer unpleasantness of the experience. Typically, reshuffles are interpreted through a narrow political lens. But a broader test that should be applied is whether reshuffles have any impact on the effectiveness, the performance or the policy direction of the government. -
Andrew Rawnsley
Andrew Rawnsley The Observer's Award-winning Associate Editor and Chief Polical Commentator "Andrew Rawnsley is a serious journalist with serious sources. He oozes credibility" The Guardian Andrew Rawnsley is a mulple award-winning writer and broadcaster. The Associate Editor and Chief Polical Commentator of the Observer, GQ Magazine declared him to be one of Britain's top five 'super-columnists' while The Spectator calls him 'the master chronicler of contemporary polics'. TOPICS: IN DETAIL: Current Affairs Andrew has made a series of highly acclaimed TV documentaries about the Politics governments of Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and John Major as well as presenng Corridors of Power the renowned flagship polical programmes, Radio 4's The Westminster Hour and The End of the Party Channel 4's The Week in Polics. He has won a string of presgious prizes for his Barack Obama journalism, including Channel 4 Polical Journalist of the Year. His award-winning Leadership and bestselling account of the rise of New Labour and its first term in office, 'Servants of the People', was published in 2001 and was praised for the acuity of LANGUAGES: its judgements and the sheer excitement of its narrave. In 'The End of the Party' Andrew Rawnsley provides the definive account of the rise and fall of New He presents in English. Labour. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. PUBLICATIONS: WHAT HE OFFERS YOU: 2010 The End of the Party Drawing on hundreds of interviews and conversaons with those at the heart of 2001 Servants of the People power, Andrew Rawnsley provides candid and astonishing accounts of life behind the walls of Westminster and the internal machinaons at the heart of the New Labour government. -
'Managing Murdoch': How the Regulator That Became a Problem
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Purvis, S. (2012). ‘Managing Murdoch’: How the regulator that became a problem then became a solution. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 1(2), pp. 143-155. doi: 10.1386/ajms.1.2.143_1 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/4059/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/ajms.1.2.143_1 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] ‘Managing Murdoch’: How the regulator that became a problem then became a solution Stewart Purvis City University London Abstract In 2009 David Cameron, the Leader of the British Conservative Party, then in opposition, announced that ‘with a Conservative Government, Ofcom1 as we know it will cease to exist’ (Tryhorn 2009; Holmwood 2009). He said the United Kingdom’s communications regulator, the Office of Communications (Ofcom), would be cut back ‘by a huge amount’ and would ‘no longer play a role in making policy’.