Form and Content in the English History Play: the Evolution of a Mature Dramatic Style in Shakespeareâ•Žs York and Lancaster

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Form and Content in the English History Play: the Evolution of a Mature Dramatic Style in Shakespeareâ•Žs York and Lancaster Studies in English, New Series Volume 11 Volumes 11-12 Article 17 1993 Form and Content in the English History Play: The Evolution of a Mature Dramatic Style in Shakespeare’s York and Lancaster Cycles Daniel L. Wright Concordia College Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/studies_eng_new Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Daniel L. (1993) "Form and Content in the English History Play: The Evolution of a Mature Dramatic Style in Shakespeare’s York and Lancaster Cycles," Studies in English, New Series: Vol. 11 , Article 17. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/studies_eng_new/vol11/iss1/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Studies in English at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in English, New Series by an authorized editor of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wright: Form and Content in the English History Play: The Evolution of a FORM AND CONTENT IN THE ENGLISH HISTORY PLAY: THE EVOLUTION OF A MATURE DRAMATIC STYLE IN SHAKESPEARE’S YORK AND LANCASTER CYCLES Daniel L. Wright Concordia College, Portland No consensus ever has been reached in the attempt to define the number of Shakespeare’s history plays, nor is there yet any general agreement among Shakespearean scholars regarding the constitutive elements of the history plays as a genre of Renaissance drama. Accordingly, though many critics have been convinced, intuitively, that plays such as King Lear and Anthony and Cleopatra are not genuine history plays, in the past there have appeared few persuasive arguments for excluding these and other plays from consideration as representative examples of the class of play known as the “history.” Scholars lately have recognized, though, that it is essential to define the genre in detail before one can argue for the inclusion of any particular play within that genre. The history play, however, lacking any classical precedent, has proven elusive of definition. When Samuel Taylor Coleridge asserted that “in order that a drama may be properly historical, it is necessary that is should be the history of the people to whom it is addressed,” he provided a critical basis for the exclusion of Shakespeare’s Roman plays from classification as histories, but he did not succeed in forming a definition comprehensive enough to exclude plays like King Lear, Macbeth, and Cymbeline until he wrote that “There is as much history in Macbeth as in Richard (II), but [the distinction depends upon] the relation of the history of the plot. In the purely historical plays, the history informs the plot...in the rest, as Macbeth, Hamlet, Cymbeline, Lear it subserves it” (221).1 In an effort to be more precise, Lily B. Campbell has attempted to forge a distinction between the tragic and historic genres by appealing to her conviction that tragedy’s attention is limited to individuals, whereas history’s attention is concentrated upon the workings of the state. As she writes, “Tragedy is concerned with the doings of men which in philosophy are discussed under politics” (17).2 Such a definition, however, for all its improvement upon the vagaries of Coleridge, yet does not help us better classify such a play as Christopher Marlowe’s Edward IL Can we declare, for example, that the subject of Edward II is Edward II? If so, does this mean that Edward II is a tragedy and not a history play? Or, if the subject of Edward II is not Published by eGrove, 1995 1 Studies in English, New Series, Vol. 11 [1995], Art. 17 152 YORK AND LANCASTER CYCLES Edward II, does this mean that Edward II is not a tragedy? The matter truly is ambiguous. Consequently, given this and similar examples, Professor Camphell's distinction does not seem especially serviceable or of particular assistance to us. It is in an attempt to address such ambiguities as these that Irving Ribner has challenged such theses as Campbell’s, contending that although modern antics often have attempted to distinguish between the history play and tragedy as mutually exclusive dramatic genres it impossible to do so. History and tragedy, in fact, are closely allied to one another, and what is more, we find them so linked almost as far back as we can follow Western civilization. (26)3 Ribner does not suggest by his remarks that there is no distinction between tragedy and history, however, nor does he presume the relationship of tragedy to history to be inseparable. Though possessive of tragic dimension, Richard III clearly is not the same type of play as Hamlet or Othello, and it would seem unintelligent to attempt to affirm a generic alliance between plays as distinct as 3 Henry VI and Coriolanus. Ribner’s point, rather, is that Campbell’s distinction between tragedy and history is extreme, artificial, and inadequate because it lacks universal applicability. Yet, if we accept Ribner’s critique, affirm the inapplicability of any doctrine which proposes an easy division between history and tragedy, and still feel uncertain of what we mean when we speak of a “history” play (rightly lacking the confidence to say what a play is, merely by observing what it is not), a review of what English society believed about history and drama prior to and contemporary with the emergence of Shakespearean drama is necessary. The Rise of the English History Play In 1950, A. P. Rossiter outlined the development of the English history play, tracing the origin of the history play to the ancient tradition of English folk drama and the medieval miracle play. Ribner’s observations concur. He notes that this folk drama “depicted historical event by means of action and dialogue,” but he concludes that it was incapable of attaining “the didactic, philosophical and political scope [of] the mature historical drama” (31); Rossiter, however, interprets the English folk drama principally to be the dramatic reflection of a popular, fingering affinity for celebrations of the rites of nature and fertility in a culture—newly Chnstianized—wherein such pagan https://egrove.olemiss.edu/studies_eng_new/vol11/iss1/17 2 Wright: Form and Content in the English History Play: The Evolution of a Daniel L. Wright 153 entertainments were officially condemned and their participants censured (42).4 Ecclesiastical prosecution notwithstanding, the folk drama flourished during the eleventh and twelfth centuries in England, and though the folk dramas gradually assumed a more Christian and less pagan character, the Decretals of Gregory IX (promulgated in the thirteenth century) continued to repudiate the folk drama, while the Bishop of Lincoln, as late as 1244, actually endeavored to suppress it as a containment of doctrine and the authority of sacred tradition. The importance of the folk drama, Rossiter and Ribner would likely conclude, is perhaps therefore more to be acknowledged for what it engendered rather than for any significant, enduring, intrinsic merits that it may in itself possess. The miracle play eventually supplanted the more primitive folk play in popularity, dramatizing and humanizing articles of Christian faith already well-known to the people through the Church’s liturgical celebrations of the sacred events of salvation history. M. M. Reese confirms the character of this dramatic evolution, adding that though these miracle plays were, at first, rather simple and undistinguished dramas, later miracle plays assumed a more mature character as they accomplished the gradual transformation from exclusively religious to at least partially secular themes, succeeded in integrating elements of allegory into the narrative, and effectively acquired a measure of plot and episodic structure (67-68).5 This dramatic evolution hastened the demise of the miracle play as the narrrative form of theatre in England; the miracle play was subsequently replaced by the morality play, which, in its most primitive form (especially in considerations of staging), the later English miracle plays sometimes resembled. The morality play emerged “in response to the need for plays which, while retaining an essential moral purpose, required fewer actors and less organizations” (68). Dramatically, the morality play succeeded in utilizing a smaller cast than the miracle play (though some plays, such as The Castle of Perseverance, employed as many as thirty-five actors). Organization of the morality provided evidence of greater dramatic development than the miracle play, as well. Many of the plays, however, attempted to depict tremendous spans of time in the life of a character, and this effort to so expand the plays’ considerations has earned them the distinctive classification of “whole-life” moralities (103). Such ambitious attempts in this regard, as the play, Mary Magdalene, revealed the fundamental weakness of the moralities’ lack of dramatic integrity as a whole and pointed to their need of such classical Published by eGrove, 1995 3 Studies in English, New Series, Vol. 11 [1995], Art. 17 154 YORK AND LANCASTER CYCLES organizational devices as Senecan five-act structure. Typically, therefore, lacking such devices to achieve order, the morality was relatively brief and either confined one’s attention to a specific period in the life of an individual or devoted attention to a specific issue, such as death, as does the morality, Everyman. Allegory, in any case, echoes Reese, characterizes all of the moralities, as it was the function of such allegorical characters as Temperance, Fortitude, Contrition, and Vice to impart moral truths to the spectators via the embodiment of imaginative abstractions (68-69). The history play, itself, developed during the Tudor dynasty in response to the closer alliance between religion and politics which attended the rise of the independent nation-state, an absolute monarchy, and a vigorous proclamation throughout Europe of the doctrine of the divine right of kings.
Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 1
    An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 1 An Introduction to Shakespeare, by H. N. MacCracken and F. E. Pierce and W. H. Durham This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: An Introduction to Shakespeare Author: H. N. MacCracken F. E. Pierce W. H. Durham Release Date: January 16, 2010 [EBook #30982] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 2 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN INTRODUCTION TO SHAKESPEARE *** Produced by Al Haines [Frontispiece: TITLE-PAGE OF THE FIRST FOLIO, 1628 The first collected edition of Shakespeare's Plays (From the copy in the New York Public Library)] AN INTRODUCTION TO SHAKESPEARE BY H. N. MacCRACKEN, PH.D. F. E. PIERCE, PH.D. AND W. H. DURHAM, PH.D. OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE SHEFFIELD SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF YALE UNIVERSITY New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1925 All rights reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 3 COPYRIGHT, 1910, By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published September, 1910. Reprinted April, December, 1911; September, 1912; July, 1913; July, 1914; December, 1915; November, 1916; May, 1918; July, 1919; November, 1920; September, 1921; June, 1923; January, 1925. Norwood Press J. S. Cushing Co.--Berwick & Smith Co. Norwood, Mass., U.S.A. {v} PREFACE The advances made in Shakespearean scholarship within the last half-dozen years seem to justify the writing of another manual for school and college use.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatricality and Historiography in Shakespeare's Richard
    H ISTRIONIC H ISTORY: Theatricality and Historiography in Shakespeare’s Richard III By David Hasberg Zirak-Schmidt This article focuses on Shakespeare’s history drama Richard III, and investigates the ambiguous intersections between early modern historiography and aesthetics expressed in the play’s use of theatrical and metatheatrical language. I examine how Shakespeare sought to address and question contemporary, ideologically charged representations of history with an analysis of the characters of Richard and Richmond, and the overarching theme of theatrical performance. By employing this strategy, it was possible for Shakespeare to represent the controversial character of Richard undogmatically while intervening in and questioning contemporary discussions of historical verisimilitude. Historians have long acknowledged the importance of the early modern history play in the development of popular historical consciousness.1 This is particularly true of England, where the history play achieved great commercial and artistic success throughout the 1590s. The Shakespearean history play has attracted by far the most attention from cultural and literary historians, and is often seen as the archetype of the genre. The tragedie of kinge RICHARD the THIRD with the death of the Duke of CLARENCE, or simply Richard III, is probably one of the most frequently performed of Shakespeare’s history plays. The play dramatizes the usurpation and short- lived reign of the infamous, hunchbacked Richard III – the last of the Plantagenet kings, who had ruled England since 1154 – his ultimate downfall, and the rise of Richmond, the future king Henry VII and founder of the Tudor dynasty. To the Elizabethan public, there was no monarch in recent history with such a dark reputation as Richard III: usurpation, tyranny, fratricide, and even incest were among his many alleged crimes, and a legacy of cunning dissimulation and cynical Machiavellianism had clung to him since his early biographers’ descriptions of him.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa State Journal of Research 56.1
    IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH I MAY, 1982 4'3 -439 Vol. 56, No. 4 IOWA STATE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 56 (August, 1981-May, 1982) No. 1, August, 1981 ASPECTS IN RENAISSANCE SCHOLARSHIP PAPERS PRESENTED AT "SHAKESPEARE AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES" SYMPOSIUM, 1981 From the Editors. 1 GALYON, L. R. Introduction...................... ...... 5 BEVINGTON, D. M. "Why Should Calamity Be Full of Words?" The Efficacy of Cursing in Richard III . 9 ANDERSON, D. K., Jr. The King's Two Rouses and Providential Revenge in Hamlet . 23 ONUSKA, J. T., Jr. Bringing Shakespeare's Characters Down to Earth: The Significance of Kneeling . 31 MULLIN, M. Catalogue-Index to Productions of the Shakespeare Memorial/Royal Shakespeare Theatre, 1879-1978 . 43 SCHAEFER, A. J. The Shape of the Supernatitral: Fuseli on Shakespeare. 49 POAGUE, L. "Reading" the Prince: Shakespeare, Welles, and Some Aspects of Chimes at Midnight . 57 KNIGHT, W. N. Equity in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. 67 STATON, S. F. Female Transvestism in Renaissance Comedy: "A Natural Perspective, That Is and Is Not" . 79 IDE, R. S. Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy and the Providential Play-Within-a-Play. 91 STEIN, C.H. Justice and Revenge in The Spanish Tragedy... 97 * * * * * * * * * * No. 2, November, 1981 From the Editors.. ... 105 TABLE OF CONTENTS PUHL, J. Forearm liquid crystal thermograms during sustained and rhythmic handgrip contractions . 107 COUNTRYMAN, D. W. and D. P. KELLEY. Management of existing hardwood stands can be profitable for private woodland owners....... .... 119 MERTINS, C. T. and D. ISLEY. Charles E. Bessey: Botanist, educator, and protagonist . 131 HELSEL, D. B.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and Brecht: a Study of Dialectic Structures in Shakespearean Drama Amd the Ir Influence Om Brecht's Theatre Amd Dramatic Theory
    University College London SHAKESPEARE AND BRECHT: A STUDY OF DIALECTIC STRUCTURES IN SHAKESPEAREAN DRAMA AMD THE IR INFLUENCE OM BRECHT'S THEATRE AMD DRAMATIC THEORY. Submitted for the degree of PhD at The University of London. DOC ROSSI 1991 1 ProQuest Number: 10609419 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10609419 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT This thesis explores aspects of Brecht's adaptations of Shakespeare's plots and rhetoric while focusing particularly on matters of structural influence. Both authors use metafictional references in their plays to foreground a stylised artificiality, thereby pointing to the interaction of social and literary semiotics. These 'alienating' strategies expose the construction and the limitations of ideologies presented in a play, demanding recognition of the dialectical processes thus engaged. The study of Brecht's theory and practice against the background of Shakespeare's drama produces new insight into B:recht's works; similarly, Shakespeare's plays viewed against the background of Brecht's theatre and dramatic theory provide new insight into Shakespeare's literary practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Saccio
    William Shakespeare: Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies Part I Professor Peter Saccio THE TEACHING COMPANY ® Peter Saccio, Ph.D. Leon D. Black Professor of Shakespearean Studies Dartmouth College Peter Saccio has taught at Dartmouth College since 1966. He chaired the English department from 1984 to 1988; in addition, he has won Dartmouth’s J. Kenneth Huntington Memorial Award for Outstanding Teaching. He has served as visiting professor at Wesleyan University and at University College in London. He received a B.A. from Yale University and a Ph.D. from Princeton. He is the author of The Court Comedies of John Lyly (1969) and Shakespeare's English Kings (1977), the latter a classic in its field. He edited Middleton’s comedy A Mad World, My Masters for the Oxford Complete Works of Thomas Middleton (1996). He has published or delivered at conferences more than twenty papers on Shakespeare and other dramatists. Professor Saccio has directed productions of Twelfth Night, Macbeth, and Cymbeline. He has devised and directed several programs of scenes from Shakespeare and from modern British drama, and he served as dramaturg for the productions of his Dartmouth colleagues. He has acted the Shakespearean roles of Casca, Angelo, Bassanio, and Henry IV as well as various parts in the ancient plays of Plautus and the modern plays of Harold Pinter, Tom Stoppard, and Peter Shaffer. ©1999 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership i Table of Contents William Shakespeare: Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies Part I Professor Biography ........................................................................................... i Foreword .......... ................................................................................................. 1 Lecture One Shakespeare Then and Now...................................... 3 Lecture Two The Nature of Shakespeare’s Plays..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Subjectivity of Revenge: Senecan Drama and the Discovery of the Tragic in Kyd and Shakespeare
    THE SUBJECTIVITY OF REVENGE: SENECAN DRAMA AND THE DISCOVERY OF THE TRAGIC IN KYD AND SHAKESPEARE JORDICORAL D.PHIL THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE SEPTEMBER 2001 But all the time life, always one and the same, always incomprehensibly keeping its identity, fills the universe and is renewed at every moment in innumerable combinations and metamorphoses. You are anxious about whether you will rise from the dead or not, but you have risen already - you rose from the dead when you were born and you didn't notice it. Will you feel pain? Do the tissues feel their disintegration? In other words, what will happen to your consciousness. But what is consciousness? Let's see. To try consciously to go to sleep is a sure way of having insomnia, to try to be conscious of one's own digestion is a sure way to upset the stomach. Consciousness is a poison when we apply it to ourselves. Consciousness is a beam of light directed outwards, it lights up the way ahead of us so that we do not trip up. It's like the head-lamps on a railway engine - if you turned the beam inwards there would be a catastrophe. 'So what will happen to your consciousness? Your consciousness, yours, not anybody else's. Well, what are you? That's the crux of the matter. Let's try to find out. What is it about you that you have always known as yourself? What are you conscious of in yourself? Your kidneys? Your liver? Your blood vessels? - No.
    [Show full text]
  • 25-2-W2016.Pdf
    The ESSE Messenger A Publication of ESSE (The European Society for the Study of English Vol. 25-2 Winter 2016 ISSN 2518-3567 All material published in the ESSE Messenger is © Copyright of ESSE and of individual contributors, unless otherwise stated. Requests for permissions to reproduce such material should be addressed to the Editor. Editor: Dr. Adrian Radu Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Faculty of Letters Department of English Str. Horea nr. 31 400202 Cluj-Napoca Romania Email address: [email protected] Cover illustration: Gower Memorial to Shakespeare, Stratford-upon-Avon This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Picture credit: Immanuel Giel Contents Shakespeare Lives 5 Europe, like Hamlet; or, Hamlet as a mousetrap J. Manuel Barbeito Varela 5 Star-crossed Lovers in Sarajevo in 2002 Ifeta Čirić-Fazlija 14 Shakespeare on Screen José Ramón Díaz Fernández 26 The Interaction of Fate and Free Will in Shakespeare’s Hamlet Özge Özkan Gürcü 57 The Relationship between Literature and Popular Fiction in Shakespeare’s Richard III Jelena Pataki 67 Re-thinking Hamlet in the 21st Century Ana Penjak 79 Reviews 91 Mark Sebba, Shahrzad Mahootian and Carla Jonsson (eds.), Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (New York & London: Routledge, 2014). 91 Bernard De Meyer and Neil Ten Kortenaar (eds.), The Changing Face of African Literature / Les nouveaux visages de la litterature africaine (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2009). 93 Derek Hand, A History of the Irish Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011). 95 Hobby Elaine.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana College Course Outline Discipline, Number
    http://www.curricunet.com/SAC/reports/course_outline_html.cfm... SANTA ANA COLLEGE COURSE OUTLINE DISCIPLINE, NUMBER, TITLE:English 233B, Shakespeare's Tragedies and History Plays (If the discipline, number or title is being revised, above should reflect the NEW information;) AND, the complete former course name MUST be included in the CATALOG ENTRY below.) CATALOG ENTRY Discipline English Course Number 233B Course Title Shakespeare's Tragedies and History Plays Former Title Units 3 Lecture Hours 48 Laboratory Hours None Arranged Hours None Total Semester Contact Hours None COURSE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(S) (C-ID) PREREQUISITE(S) Prerequisite English 101 or 101H. CATALOG DESCRIPTION Study of selected Shakespearean history plays and tragedies. Emphasizes dramatic elements, depiction of human nature, and timeless/timely conflicts. Augmented by films and, if available, appropriate field trips. Different selections in English 233ABCD. (Same as Theatre Arts 233B.) Budget Unit Classification Code Y Transfer Code A-Transferable to both UC and CSU Method of Instruction 10 SAM Priority Code E - Non-Occupational Repeatability NR - Non-Repeatable: D, F, NC, W TOPS Code 150100 - English (Writing) Topics Course No Open Entry/Exit No Grading Options Curriculum Office Use Only. Department Chair Approval Date: Divison Chair Approval Date: Curriculum and Instruction Council Chair Approval Date: COURSE CONTENT (Include major topics of the course, time required, and what the student is expected to learn.) All activities require critical thinking skills and the ability to apply college level concepts, vocabulary and learning skills. Introduction to Shakespeare's England and Theatre (3 hours) 1 of 6 8/23/12 8:56 PM http://www.curricunet.com/SAC/reports/course_outline_html.cfm..
    [Show full text]
  • THE PROBLEM of the HERO in SHAKESPEARE's KING JOHN APPROVED: R Professor Suiting Professor Minor Professor Partment of English
    THE PROBLEM OF THE HERO IN SHAKESPEARE'S KING JOHN APPROVED: r Professor / suiting Professor Minor Professor l-Q [Ifrector of partment of English Dean or the Graduate School THE PROBLEM OF THE HERO IN SHAKESPEARE'S KING JOHN THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Wilbert Harold Ratledge, Jr., B. A. Denton, Texas June, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE MILIEU OF KING JOHN 7 III. TUDOR HISTORIOGRAPHY 12 IV. THE ENGLISH CHRONICLE PLAY 22 V. THE SOURCES OF KING JOHN 39 VI. JOHN AS HERO 54 VII. FAULCONBRIDGE AS HERO 67 VIII. ENGLAND AS HERO 82 IX. WHO IS THE VILLAIN? 102 X. CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY 118 in CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION During the last twenty-five years Shakespeare scholars have puolished at least five major works which deal extensively with Shakespeare's history plays. In addition, many critical articles concerning various aspects of the histories have been published. Some of this new material reinforces traditional interpretations of the history plays; some offers new avenues of approach and differs radically in its consideration of various elements in these dramas. King John is probably the most controversial of Shakespeare's history plays. Indeed, almost everything touching the play is in dis- pute. Anyone attempting to investigate this drama must be wary of losing his way among the labyrinths of critical argument. Critical opinion is amazingly divided even over the worth of King John. Hardin Craig calls it "a great historical play,"^ and John Masefield finds it to be "a truly noble play .
    [Show full text]
  • Richard III: the Sources What Did We Know When?
    Richard III: The Sources What did we know when? Treatment of Richard after the battle Many sources refer to Richard being brought back to Leicester, naked, and laid out for a number of days to allow the public to view him. • Crowland Chronicle, c.1486, “Richard’s body was found among the other slain.... Many other insults were heaped on it, and, not very humanely, a halter was thrown round the neck, and it was carried to Leicester...” • ‘‘They brought King Richard thither that night as naked as he borne might bee. & in Newarke Laid was hee, that many a one might looke on him” Ballad of Bosworth Field (Percy 1867-8; quoted by Kelly 1884 and Billson 1920) • A Castilian letter by Diego de Valera, early 1486, also mentions that Richard’s body was “covered from the waist downward with a black rag of poor quality, [Earl Henry] ordering him to be exposed there three days to the universal gaze.” De Valera 1878, 94; Bennett, 1993, 160 • Robert Fabyan, Fabyans Chronicle (1533), “And Richard late King as gloriously as he by the morning departed from that town, so as irreverently was he that afternoon brought into that town, for his body despoiled to the skin, and nought being left about him, so much as would cover his privy member, he was trussed behind the pursuivant called Norroy as an hog or another vile beast, and so all besprung with mire and filth was brought to a church in Leicester for all men to wonder upon, and there lastly irreverently buried.” (Bennett, 1993, 164) • Polydore Vergil, Anglica Historia, about 1503-13, describes how “Richard’s naked body was slung over a horse, its head, arms and legs dangling,” Vergil 2005 (see also Wright 2002, 141) • Thomas More, History of King Richard III (English version) between 1512-19, “Kinge Richarde himselfe as ye shal herafter here, slain in the fielde, hacked and hewed of his enemies handes, haryed on horseback dead, his here in despite torn and togged lyke a cur dogge”.
    [Show full text]
  • Carole Levin and Charles Beem This Series Brings Together Monographs
    QUEENSHIP AND POWER Series Editors: Carole Levin and Charles Beem This series brings together monographs and edited volumes from scholars specializing in gender analysis, women’s studies, literary interpretation, and cultural, political, constitu- tional, and diplomatic history. It aims to broaden our understanding of the strategies that queens—both consorts and regnants, as well as female regents—pursued in order to wield political power within the structures of male-dominant societies. In addition to works describing European queenship, it also includes books on queenship as it appeared in other parts of the world, such as East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Islamic civilization. Editorial Board Linda Darling, University of Arizona (Ottoman Empire) Theresa Earenfi ght, Seattle University (Spain) Dorothy Ko, Barnard College (China) Nancy Kollman, Stanford University (Russia) John Thornton, Boston University (Africa and the Atlantic World) John Watkins (France and Italy) Published by Palgrave Macmillan The Lioness Roared: The Problems of Female Rule in English History By Charles Beem Elizabeth of York By Arlene Naylor Okerlund Learned Queen: The Imperial Image of Elizabeth I By Linda Shenk High and Mighty Queens of Early Modern England: Realities and Representations Edited by Carole Levin, Debra Barrett-Graves, and Jo Eldridge Carney The Monstrous Regiment of Women: Female Rulers in Early Modern Europe By Sharon L. Jansen The Face of Queenship: Early Modern Representations of Elizabeth I By Anna Riehl Elizabeth I: The Voice of a Monarch By Ilona Bell Tudor Queenship: The Reigns of Mary and Elizabeth By Anna Whitelock and Alice Hunt The Death of Elizabeth I: Remembering and Reconstructing the Virgin Queen By Catherine Loomis Queenship and Voice in Medieval Northern Europe By William Layher The Foreign Relations of Elizabeth I Edited by Charles Beem The French Queen’s Letters: Mary Tudor Brandon and the Politics of Marriage in Sixteenth-Century Europe By Erin A.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and the Nobility: the Negotiation of Lineage Catherine Grace Canino Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87291-1 - Shakespeare and the Nobility: The Negotiation of Lineage Catherine Grace Canino Index More information Index Abergavennys 114 Battle of Agincourt 229 Abrahall, John of Gylough 130 Battle of Barnet 107 Adams, Simon 27 Battle of Bosworth Field 7, 12, 181, 186 Adamson, John 232 Battle of Calais 97 Admiral’s Men 1 Battle of Flodden Field 154 Aeneas 166 Battle of Harfleur 222 Anderson, Andrew 72 Battle of Northampton 34, 205 Anstis, John 148 Battle of Orleans 131, 139, 140, 142 Archbold, W. A. J. 198 Battle of Ronuray 139 Ardens 24, 30, 115, 125, 205, 223 Battle of St. Albans 120, 121, 164 Arden, Barbara 115 Battle of Shrewsbury 222 aristocracy 227, 228 Battle of Stoke 86, 132 attire of 225 Battle of Zutphen 189 celebrity status of 39–40, 224–226 Beauchamps 8, 23, 125 economic effect of 225 Beauchamp, Anne, Countess of Warwick 105, Elizabeth I and 232 125 entertainments of 225 Beauchamp, Margaret, Countess of feuds between 169–170 Shrewsbury 130 importance of family 3–5 Beauchamp, Richard, thirteenth Earl of importance of lineage (see also genealogy) 5 Warwick 105, 110, 126 legal rights 231–232 in 1HenryVI109–111, 113, 117, 127 portrayal in chronicles 14–15, 29 Beauforts 7, 8, 34, 52, 103, 155 portrayal in history plays 2–3, 15–18 Beaufort, Edmund, Duke of Somerset 34, 76, power of 222–223 77, 78, 81, 84–85, 109, 110, 117, 123, 125, recreation of medieval aristocracy 226–227 131, 134, 165, 205, 206, 207 titular lineage 8–10, 230 Beaufort, Henry, second Earl of Somerset 9, under Tudors 11–12, 227 10 Arston, Peter 158, 174 Beaufort, Henry, Cardinal, Bishop of Armada of Spain 43, 116, 158, 166, 200 Winchester 80, 81, 82, 112–113 Ascham, Roger 13 in 1HenryVI109, 110, 113, 207 Aspall, Robert 151 in Contention/ 2 Henry VI 112–113, 117, 120, Atkinson, Ant.
    [Show full text]