Notes & Queries Notes & Queries
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Friends Acquisitions 1964-2018
Acquired with the Aid of the Friends Manuscripts 1964: Letter from John Dury (1596-1660) to the Evangelical Assembly at Frankfurt-am- Main, 6 August 1633. The letter proposes a general assembly of the evangelical churches. 1966: Two letters from Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury, to Nicholas of Lucca, 1413. Letter from Robert Hallum, Bishop of Salisbury concerning Nicholas of Lucca, n.d. 1966: Narrative by Leonardo Frescobaldi of a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1384. 1966: Survey of church goods in 33 parishes in the hundreds of Blofield and Walsham, Norfolk, 1549. 1966: Report of a debate in the House of Commons, 27 February 1593. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Petition to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners by Miles Coverdale and others, 1565. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Correspondence and papers of Christopher Wordsworth (1807-1885), Bishop of Lincoln. 1968: Letter from John Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, to John Boys, 1599. 1968: Correspondence and papers of William Howley (1766-1848), Archbishop of Canterbury. 1969: Papers concerning the divorce of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. 1970: Papers of Richard Bertie, Marian exile in Wesel, 1555-56. 1970: Notebook of the Nonjuror John Leake, 1700-35. Including testimony concerning the birth of the Old Pretender. 1971: Papers of Laurence Chaderton (1536?-1640), puritan divine. 1971: Heinrich Bullinger, History of the Reformation. Sixteenth century copy. 1971: Letter from John Davenant, Bishop of Salisbury, to a minister of his diocese [1640]. 1971: Letter from John Dury to Mr. Ball, Preacher of the Gospel, 1639. 1972: ‘The examination of Valentine Symmes and Arthur Tamlin, stationers, … the Xth of December 1589’. -
Why We Hold to the King James Bible) Is Also Contained in a Course Designed for Use in Forums Such As Bible Colleges, Sunday Schools, and Home Schooling
Copyright 2006 by David W. Cloud Updated November 14, 2008 ISBN 1-58318-104-0 This material cannot be placed on BBS or Internet Web sites Published by Way of Life Literature P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061 866-295-4143 (toll free) [email protected] (e-mail) http://www.wayoflife.org (web site) Canada: Bethel Baptist Church, 4212 Campbell St. N., London, Ont. N6P1A6 519-652-2619 (voice) 519-652-0056 (fax) [email protected] (e-mail) Printed in Canada by Bethel Baptist Print Ministry 2 ADVERTISEMENT FOR ADVANCED BIBLE STUDIES COURSE ON “THE BIBLE VERSION ISSUE” The information in this book (Why We Hold to the King James Bible) is also contained in a course designed for use in forums such as Bible Colleges, Sunday Schools, and Home Schooling. The course is one of the Way of Life Advanced Bible Studies Series and is entitled “The Bible Version Issue.” The material is laid out in outline form to simplify teaching. The Bible Version Issue course includes review questions after each section for the students, plus there is a separate book for teachers containing sectional and final tests with the answers. The review questions and tests are carefully designed to draw the student’s attention to the most important points and to help him remember these points long after the course is finished. The sectional review questions go over all of the important points in the section, while the sectional tests draw from the most important of the review questions and the final test draws from the most important points of the sectional tests. -
Lindsley Family Genealogical Collection, 1784-2016
State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives Lindsley Family Genealogical Collection, 1784-2016 COLLECTION SUMMARY Creator: Rose, Stanley Frazer Inclusive Dates: 1784-2016, bulk 1850-1920 Scope & Content: Consists of genealogical research relating to the Lindsley family and its related branches. These records primarily contain photocopied research relating to the history of these families. There are two folders in Box 1 that hold information regarding Berrien family membership in the Society of the Cincinnati. Rose also compiled detailed genealogy trees and booklets for all of the family branches. This collection was kept in the original order in which it was donated. The compiler also created the folder titles. Physical Description/Extent: 6 cubic feet Accession/Record Group Number: 2016-028 Language: English Permanent Location: XV-E-5-6 1 Repository: Tennessee State Library and Archives, 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee, 37243-0312 Administrative/Biographical History Stanley Frazer Rose is a third great grandson Rev. Philip Lindsley (1786-1855). He received his law degree and master’s degree in management from Vanderbilt University. Organization/Arrangement of Materials Collection is loosely organized and retains the order in which it was received. Conditions of Access and Use Restrictions on Access: No restrictions. Restrictions on Use and Reproduction: While the Tennessee State Library and Archives houses an item, it does not necessarily hold the copyright on the item, nor may it be able to determine if the item is still protected under current copyright law. Users are solely responsible for determining the existence of such instances and for obtaining any other permissions and paying associated fees that may be necessary for the intended use. -
Church Plate in Kent
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( 262 ) OHUROH PLATE IN KENT, No. III.* THE following article deals with the Church Plate of the Cathedral and the twenty-three parishes in the Rural Deanery of Canterbury. The sacred vessels, now in the custody of the Dean and Chapter, are, with possibly two exceptions, all of post-Reformation date, and before describing the some- what meagre list of Church Plate now preserved in the Treasury, it will be interesting to take a cursory glance at the Mediseval Inventories detailing the wealth and splendour of the possessions of the Prior and Convent of Christ Church. By the labours of Dr. Wickham Legg and Mr. St. John Hope these Inventories have recently been transcribed and printedjf and a careful study of their contents will well repay the student of the usages of the Mediseval Church. For the purposes of the present article, however, we must confine our examination to a short summary of those portions of the Inventories which deal with the Altar Plate. The earliest extant list appears to be one now preserved amongst the Cottonian MSS. in the Library of the British Museum [Gralba, E. iv], and is dated 2 Pebruary 1315-16, in the days of Prior Henry of Eastry, to whom we are indebted for the beautiful stone work screen of the Cathedral Choir. In this Inventory six gold chalices and patens (Oalices et patene auree) are enumerated, of whieh the first was a great one with gems in tbe knop given by King Henry III. -
Supplement to the London Gazette, 13 June, 1947 2663
SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 13 JUNE, 1947 2663 INDIAN ARMY. Colonel Commandant, Army Physical Training Corps, Capt. (Hon. Maj.) A. H. ASHMORE (5106). is appointed Representative Colonel Commandant, Capt. A. MANGNALL (11283). Royal Armoured Corps, i2th May 1947. Capt. (now T. Maj.) M..T. PROCTER (11980). Lt.-Gen. Sir Richard McCREERY, K.C.B., K.B.E., Capt. (now T. Maj.) F. A. ROWLEY, M.C. (2773) D.S.O., M.C., Colonel i4/2Oth Hussars, is appointed (now Worcs. SRegt.). Representative (Colonel Commandant, Royal Capt. (now T. Maj.) J. W. SHIELD (6740). Armoured Corps, 2ist May 1947. Lt. A. J. HADDRELL (892*8) (now R.A.S.C.). K.D.G. The following Officer is awarded the Efficiency Short Service Comm. Medal (Militia) ist Clasp. 2nd Lt. (War Subs. Lt.) William MULLIGAN (324479) from R.A.C. (Emerg. Commn.) to be Lt., iRoYAL ENGINEERS. ist Dec. 1946, with seniority, I5th Apr. 1944. Capt. (Qr.-Mr.) H. WARDILL (244836). Royals. The following Officers are awarded the Efficiency Short Service Comm. Medal (Militia). Lt. (Qr.-Mr.) (War Subs. Capt.) (Qr.-Mr.) Albert Edward Barker WILSON (143612) from. K.O.Y.L.I. ROYAL ENGINEERS. (Emerg. Commn.) to be Capt. (Qr.-Mr.), ist May Lt. (Hon. Capt.) D. GLYNN (166529). I947. with seniority, i2th July 1943 Lt. (now T. Maj.) J. HOWAKD-APPLETON (124350). Lt. (Qr.-Mr.) (now Capt. Qr.-Mr.) H. WARDILL ^th H. (244836). 2nd Lt. (War Subs. Lt.) Stanley Edgar WALLIS (3690318) from Emerg. Commn. to be 2nd Lt., I4th June 1947, with seniority, loth June 1947. The War Office, i^th June, 1947. -
Sep-Nov 2019
The SEP - NOV 2019 VOL 30 ISSUE 3 Updates From The Executive Director By Kim Kovesci, MAPS Executive Director Whenever we can, we talk about our Mission Statement to make sure everyone knows the reason for MAPS Air Muse- um to exist. We exist to educate the public on the history of aviation and its impact on man. But we have evolved to in- clude two more significant areas; 1) We provide a place for retiree's to maintain their skills and contribute to our overall mission, and 2) Maybe our most important responsibility: to "Honor our Veterans and those who have made the ultimate sacrifice." This can be seen throughout the year as we remembered D-Day and our WWII Veterans during the summer pancake breakfast, opened the facility for a medal award ceremony in July and in November will honor an F-16 pilot who tragi- cally lost his life in Iraq. At our summer pancake breakfast, over 800 were on-hand to watch a ceremony honoring eleven WWII Veterans. Some of our visitors were able to climb into a C-47 Skytrain where they listened to Reed Kimball tell the story of the paratroopers during D-Day. We placed all of the WWII aircraft in the center of the tarmac so our visitors could get up close to these wonderful machines. Our visitors were treated to two WWII Bombers, an A-26 Invader and one of only seven B-26 Marauders left in the world. The other three WWII vin- tage aircraft were a Beechcraft, a C-47 Skytrain and a PT-19 train- er. -
DACS Working Paper February 1996 the British and American Armies in World War II: Explaining Variations in Organizational Learni
DACS Working Paper February 1996 The British and American Armies in World War II: Explaining Variations in Organizational Learning Patterns Eric Heginbotham The Defense and Arms Control Studies Program is a graduate-level, research and training program based at the MIT Center for International Studies. It is supported by core grants from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the DACS Corporate Consortium. WP #96-2 I I The British and American Armies in World War II: Explaining Variations in Organizational Learning Patterns Eric Heginbotham February 1996 Defense and Arms Control Studies Program Working Papers Series L Introduction During the Second World War, American and British armored units fought against the same foe on the same ground using the same equipment. American effectiveness improved dramatically in three years of active operations. British effectiveness improved at a much slower rate during their five years of activity. By 1944, American units were more adept at employing combined arms in concert to achieve a variety of ends, attacking with greater flexibility, and following up tactical success to reap operational and strategic benefits. Why did these military organizations learn and improve at different rates? This question is of more than historical interest. It helps us understand the more fundamental question of how large and complex organizations "learn" lessons and adapt to new circumstances. This paper examines three candidate explanations -
History from the Middle: the Case of the Second World War* I
History from the Middle: The Case of the Second World War* I Paul Kennedy Abstract Writing on modern warfare lately has tended to focus upon two vital but divergent trends, which might be termed the War from Above and War from Below schools of analysis. This essay concentrates instead upon the middle levels of warfare, drawing examples from mid-World War Two, where the chief operational objectives of the Allies were clearly established (at Casablanca, January 1943), but had yet to be realized. The realization of such military goals as defeat of the U-boat threat, or gaining domination of the air over Europe, in turn required breakthroughs that could only come from what one might term “the mid- level managers of war”-inventors, scientists, civil servants, captains of naval squadrons, and commanders of air groups. Scholars of these campaigns have long recognized the importance of the changes that occurred at the operational level of war between 1943 and 1944; this essay offers a larger synthetic analysis of their argument. his paper, in the memory of George C. Marshall’s extraordinary role as the greatest of the Grand Alliance’s generals-cum-politicians, concentrates upon, andT develops a theory about, the operational and tactical history of the middle * Being the 2009 Annual George C. Marshall Foundation Lecture, sponsored by the George C. Marshall Foundation and the Society for Military History, and delivered at the annual meet- ing of the American Historical Association, in New York, Sunday, 4 January 2009. Paul Kennedy is the Director of International Security Studies and the J. -
The Maritime Archaeology of Duplex Drive Tanks in the United Kingdom
The Maritime Archaeology of Duplex Drive Tanks in the United Kingdom Thomas Cousins Bournemouth University, UK [email protected] Thomas Harrison MSDS Marine, UK [email protected] Dave Parham Bournemouth University, UK [email protected] Abstract The catastrophe at Dieppe in 1942, where unsupported infantry attempted to capture a fortified beachhead, showed the allied forces how difficult such a venture was. As part of the invasion plan for what became Operation NEPTUNE or the Normandy landings, the allied staff saw the need for armoured support for the first waves of troops ashore. This need evolved into the concept of ‘swimming tanks’ that would land a few minutes ahead of the first infantry waves. The development of such a weapon was undertaken in conditions of absolute secrecy in the UK from late 1942 onwards. This secrecy led to the destruction of much of the historical records that relate to these armoured vehicles, leaving a confused and largely unknown record of what was an important aspect of WWII. This project sets out to record the known examples of such vehicles on the coast of the UK including a group lost as part of ‘Exercise SMASH’, the largest live ammunition exercise of the war, a full scale beach assault training exercise with all supporting arms including amphibious tanks. Though six tanks were lost during the exercise in conditions, which are not fully understood, the loss led to the changing of the operational plans for D-Day. Using archaeological and historic data, this project offers an alternative interpretation for these loses and provides a better understanding of their subsequent impact on Operation NEPTUNE. -
Schaff, Philip, 1819
The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary Columbia University in the City of New York Union Theological Seminary Archives 1 Finding Aid for Philip Schaff Papers, 1838 - 1896 Philip Schaff Credit: Union Theological Seminary Records, The Burke Library Finding Aid prepared by: Kathleen Ford, 1985; Revised by Ruth Tonkiss Cameron, 2006; Revised by Todd Willison, 2012 Summary Information Creator: Philip Schaff, 1819-1893 Title: Philip Schaff Papers, 1838 - 1896 Inclusive dates: 1838 -1896 Bulk dates: 1839 - 1889 Abstract: Privat-docent, University of Berlin; Professor of in German Reform Church seminary, Mercersburg, PA; Secretary of NY Sabbath Committee; UTS Professor of Theological Encyclopedia and Christian-Symbolics, 1870-72; of Hebrew, 1872-74; of Sacred Literature from 1875; Founder of American branch of Evangelical Alliance and President of American Bible Revision Committee. Correspondence; lectures notes, diaries; travel journal; scrapbook; photo album of theologians Size: 7 boxes, 2 oversized boxes, 5.5 linear feet Storage: Onsite storage Repository: The Burke Library Union Theological Seminary 3041 Broadway New York, NY 10027 Email: [email protected] UTS1: Philip Schaff Papers, 1838-1896 2 Administrative Information Provenance: Donated to the Burke Library by David Schaff, 1896. Semi-Centennial Documents, Berlin 1842 - New York 1892, were added to the Collection from an undocumented source in September 1995. Charles R. Gillett’s student notes on Schaff lectures were added to the collection at an unknown date, possibly while Gillett was librarian for UTS. Access: Archival papers are available to registered readers for consultation by appointment only. Please contact archives staff by phone, fax or email [email protected], as far in advance as possible. -
A Dunblane Museum Project
A Dunblane Museum Project CONTENTS Introduction 05 What was the Atlantic Wall 07 Who built the Wall? 08 Why are there Atlantic Walls in the UK? 09 Where are the other UK Walls? 11 Intelligence – finding out about the real wall 12 Hobart’s Funnies 14 The Anti Concrete Committee: what was their role? 16 What we know about the Sherffmuir Wall 18 Local Information 20 Sources 26 Glossary 27 Further reading 27 Acknowledgements 28 One section of the Sheriffmuir Wall as it looks now The concrete was reinforced with metal bars. 01 (2014). Laser scanning shows more detail and 02 The success of an explosive device could be will even be able to render the wall to show it in its measured by how deformed the metal bars were. original state. Image: Wardrop and Crockett Image: Wardrop and Crockett INTRODUCTION The existence of a replica of the Atlantic Wall on the Sheriffmuir Hills above Dunblane seems to have remained something of a secret for over 70 years. It has been recorded and listed as an historic monument. However, locals still seem to know very little about it. Some ten years ago the husband of one of our museum volunteers mentioned that he had been in Dunblane in 1943 working on the construction of the wall at Sheriffmuir. In August 2012 Gordon sent us a letter about his time in Dunblane. He apologises that his memory is not as clear as it once was: 49th Division came to Scotland in July 1943 for training in its role of assault division for the Normandy landings. -
The Management of Change
1 The Management of Change - Mechanizing the British Regular and Household Cavalry Regiments 1918 -1942 Roger Edward Salmon DMS., BA (Hons). A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2013 This work or any part thereof has not been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or any other purposes. Save for any express acknowledgements, references and/or biblographies cited in this work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Roger Edward Salmon to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature………………………………………………………… Date……………………………………………………………….. 2 Abstract The mechanization of British Cavalry regiments took place between the two World Wars and on into 1942. This thesis describes the process by which horsed cavalrymen were re-trained in armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) and the experiences of some of the regiments managing this change. Extensive use has been made of the oral testimonies of many of the soldiers involved, a number of whom are still living, as well as regimental and War Office archives. The reason given for the delay in cavalry mechanization, cited in some military histories, much influenced by Sir Basil Liddell Hart, was resistance from the cavalry to parting from their horses.