DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplement to the London Gazette, 13 June, 1947 2663

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplement to the London Gazette, 13 June, 1947 2663 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 13 JUNE, 1947 2663 INDIAN ARMY. Colonel Commandant, Army Physical Training Corps, Capt. (Hon. Maj.) A. H. ASHMORE (5106). is appointed Representative Colonel Commandant, Capt. A. MANGNALL (11283). Royal Armoured Corps, i2th May 1947. Capt. (now T. Maj.) M..T. PROCTER (11980). Lt.-Gen. Sir Richard McCREERY, K.C.B., K.B.E., Capt. (now T. Maj.) F. A. ROWLEY, M.C. (2773) D.S.O., M.C., Colonel i4/2Oth Hussars, is appointed (now Worcs. SRegt.). Representative (Colonel Commandant, Royal Capt. (now T. Maj.) J. W. SHIELD (6740). Armoured Corps, 2ist May 1947. Lt. A. J. HADDRELL (892*8) (now R.A.S.C.). K.D.G. The following Officer is awarded the Efficiency Short Service Comm. Medal (Militia) ist Clasp. 2nd Lt. (War Subs. Lt.) William MULLIGAN (324479) from R.A.C. (Emerg. Commn.) to be Lt., iRoYAL ENGINEERS. ist Dec. 1946, with seniority, I5th Apr. 1944. Capt. (Qr.-Mr.) H. WARDILL (244836). Royals. The following Officers are awarded the Efficiency Short Service Comm. Medal (Militia). Lt. (Qr.-Mr.) (War Subs. Capt.) (Qr.-Mr.) Albert Edward Barker WILSON (143612) from. K.O.Y.L.I. ROYAL ENGINEERS. (Emerg. Commn.) to be Capt. (Qr.-Mr.), ist May Lt. (Hon. Capt.) D. GLYNN (166529). I947. with seniority, i2th July 1943 Lt. (now T. Maj.) J. HOWAKD-APPLETON (124350). Lt. (Qr.-Mr.) (now Capt. Qr.-Mr.) H. WARDILL ^th H. (244836). 2nd Lt. (War Subs. Lt.) Stanley Edgar WALLIS (3690318) from Emerg. Commn. to be 2nd Lt., I4th June 1947, with seniority, loth June 1947. The War Office, i^th June, 1947. Short Service Comm. War Subs. Capt. (Qr.-Mr.) W. McGouGH (317407) ERRATA. from R.A.C. to be War Subs. Capt. (Qr.-Mr.), i4th June 1947, retaining his present seniority. The Efficiency Medal (Territorial). 8th H. The London Gazette (No. 37787) of i4th November, Lt. N. P. BROMILEY (124518) from R.A.C. to be 1946. Lt., i4th June 1947, retaining his present seniority. For Lt. F. C. de PAULA, Royal Engineers (96548). Substitute Lt. F. C. de PAULA, Royal Artillery gth L. Capt. Hon. R. E. LLOYD-MOSTYN, M.C. (95554), (96548)- retires on account of disability, i3th June 1947. For Lt. P. L. G. S. CLOSE, Royal Engineers (153129). Substitute Lt. P. L. G. S. CLOSE, The Suffolk Short Service Comm. Regiment (153129). 2nd Lt. (War Subs. Lt.) Charles BENNETT, M.B.E (270701), from Gen. List (Inf.) (Emerg. Commn.) t<\ For J. Comd. D. D. W. BROWSSON, Auxiliary Terri- be Lt., 8th May 1947, with seniority, irth Feb. torial Service (196868). Substitute J. Comd. D. D. W. BROUSSON, Auxiliary 1943- Territorial Service (196868). loth H. Short Service Comm. The London Gazette (No. 37799) of 28th November, Lt. (Qr.-Mr.) Oliver Francis Cecil CANNING, D.C.M. 1946. (325666) from R.A.C. (Emerg. Commn.) to be Lt. Delete Lt. E. A. J. CATLTN, Royal Engineers (168483) (Qr.-Mr.), ist Apr. 1947, with seniority, 2Oth May (awarded this Medal for services as an Other 1944- Rank in Army Order 98 of 1939). izth L. Short Service Comm. The London Gazette (No. 37847) of Qth January, Lt. R.. de C. RENNICK (2581.82) from R.A.C. to 1947- be Lt., I4th June 1947, retaining his present For Lt. (T. Capt.) B. DALEY, The Manchester seniority. Regiment (71576). Substitute Lt. (now Capt.) B. DALEY, The Manchester i6th/<5th L. Regiment (71576). Maj. G BABINGTON (28101) retires on ret. pay, i4th June 1.947, and is granted the hon. rank of For Sub. S. C. PUCKLE, Auxiliary Territorial Service Lt.-Col. (I96357). Substitute Sub. (T. J. Comd.) S. C. PUCKLE, Auxiliary R.T.R. Territorial Service (196357). Maj.-Gen. Sir Percy HOBART, K.B.E., C.B., D.S.O.. The London Gazette (No. 37873) of 6th February, 'ate Royal Tank Regiment, ret. pay, is appointed 1947- Colonel Commandant, Royal Tank Regiment, ist May 1947, vice Maj.-Gen. G. M. LINDSAY, C.B., For Capt. J. F. W. HARDY, Royal Army Chaplains' C.M.G., D.S.O., ret. pay, resigned. Department (8675 7). Capt. R. G. S. SAUNDERS (66186) to be Maj.. 7th Substitute Rev. J. F. W. HARDY, Royal Army Mar. 1947. Chaplains' Department, Chaplain to the Forces 2nd Lt. A. J. BLAD (331023) from R.A.C. to be (4th Class), ranking as Captain (86757). 2nd Lt., i4th June 1947, retaining his present For Captain R. TOLLEMACHE, Royal Army Chaplains' seniority. Department (90709). Short Service Comm. Substitute Rev. R. TOLLEMACHE, Royal Army Capt. F. DAWSON (320836) from R.A.C. to be Chaplains' Department, Chaplain to the Forces Capt., i4trh June 1947, retaining his present seniority. (4th Class), ranking as Captain (90709). 2nd Lt. (War Subs. Lt.) Cyril Edward Aubfy HOLLOWAY (378759) from Ind. Army (Emerg. Commn.) to be Lt., ist May 1947, with seniority, 29th Apr. 1943. War Office, i$th June, 1947. Lt. (Qr.-Mr.) John TAYLOR, M.M. (356657), from R.A.C. (Emerg. Commn.) to be Lt. (Qr.-Mr.), ist REGULAR ARMY. May 1947, with seniority, i6th Sept. 1945. Lt.-Gen. Sir N. M. de la P. BERESFORD-PIERSE, ROYAL REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY K.B.E., C.B., D.S.O. (408-5), retires on ret. pay, i3th Maj. E. W. P. MOYLAN (55023) retires with a June 194-7. gratuity, i3th June 19147, and is granted the hon. Lt.-Col. J. RICE, O.B.E. (133002), Ind. Army, rank of Lt.-Col. is granted the hon. rank of Col., I2th June 1947. •Maj. E. C. ASHWORTH (17796) retires on ret. pay, CAVALRY. i2th June 1947. L.G. The undermentioned Lts. to be Capts., loth May Short Service Comm. I947> with seniority, ist J'uly 1946: — 2nd Lt (War Sabs. Maj.) Reginald Kingsley (War Subs. Capt.) W. J. SCOTT, M.C. (1243,17). CHFESMAN (115533) from Emerg. Commn., to be •(War Subs. Capt.) H. PORTER (137759). Maj., ist May 1947, with seniority, 2oth Sept. 1945. (War Subs. Capt.) O. T. W. MAJOR (160419). ROYAL ARMOURED CORPS. B. G. GRIFFITHS (132673). Field-Marshal Viscount MONTGOMERY OF ALAMEIN, Lt. D. G. HADOW, M.C. (179947), to be Capt., 'ist K.G., G.C.B., D.S.O., Colonel Commandant, Royal Mar. 1947. Tank Regiment; Colonel, Royal Warwickshire Regi- Lt. R. V. J. ELLIS (243175) to foe Capt., ment; Colonel Commandant, Parachute Regiment; June 1947..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lindsley Family Genealogical Collection, 1784-2016
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives Lindsley Family Genealogical Collection, 1784-2016 COLLECTION SUMMARY Creator: Rose, Stanley Frazer Inclusive Dates: 1784-2016, bulk 1850-1920 Scope & Content: Consists of genealogical research relating to the Lindsley family and its related branches. These records primarily contain photocopied research relating to the history of these families. There are two folders in Box 1 that hold information regarding Berrien family membership in the Society of the Cincinnati. Rose also compiled detailed genealogy trees and booklets for all of the family branches. This collection was kept in the original order in which it was donated. The compiler also created the folder titles. Physical Description/Extent: 6 cubic feet Accession/Record Group Number: 2016-028 Language: English Permanent Location: XV-E-5-6 1 Repository: Tennessee State Library and Archives, 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee, 37243-0312 Administrative/Biographical History Stanley Frazer Rose is a third great grandson Rev. Philip Lindsley (1786-1855). He received his law degree and master’s degree in management from Vanderbilt University. Organization/Arrangement of Materials Collection is loosely organized and retains the order in which it was received. Conditions of Access and Use Restrictions on Access: No restrictions. Restrictions on Use and Reproduction: While the Tennessee State Library and Archives houses an item, it does not necessarily hold the copyright on the item, nor may it be able to determine if the item is still protected under current copyright law. Users are solely responsible for determining the existence of such instances and for obtaining any other permissions and paying associated fees that may be necessary for the intended use.
    [Show full text]
  • Sep-Nov 2019
    The SEP - NOV 2019 VOL 30 ISSUE 3 Updates From The Executive Director By Kim Kovesci, MAPS Executive Director Whenever we can, we talk about our Mission Statement to make sure everyone knows the reason for MAPS Air Muse- um to exist. We exist to educate the public on the history of aviation and its impact on man. But we have evolved to in- clude two more significant areas; 1) We provide a place for retiree's to maintain their skills and contribute to our overall mission, and 2) Maybe our most important responsibility: to "Honor our Veterans and those who have made the ultimate sacrifice." This can be seen throughout the year as we remembered D-Day and our WWII Veterans during the summer pancake breakfast, opened the facility for a medal award ceremony in July and in November will honor an F-16 pilot who tragi- cally lost his life in Iraq. At our summer pancake breakfast, over 800 were on-hand to watch a ceremony honoring eleven WWII Veterans. Some of our visitors were able to climb into a C-47 Skytrain where they listened to Reed Kimball tell the story of the paratroopers during D-Day. We placed all of the WWII aircraft in the center of the tarmac so our visitors could get up close to these wonderful machines. Our visitors were treated to two WWII Bombers, an A-26 Invader and one of only seven B-26 Marauders left in the world. The other three WWII vin- tage aircraft were a Beechcraft, a C-47 Skytrain and a PT-19 train- er.
    [Show full text]
  • DACS Working Paper February 1996 the British and American Armies in World War II: Explaining Variations in Organizational Learni
    DACS Working Paper February 1996 The British and American Armies in World War II: Explaining Variations in Organizational Learning Patterns Eric Heginbotham The Defense and Arms Control Studies Program is a graduate-level, research and training program based at the MIT Center for International Studies. It is supported by core grants from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the DACS Corporate Consortium. WP #96-2 I I The British and American Armies in World War II: Explaining Variations in Organizational Learning Patterns Eric Heginbotham February 1996 Defense and Arms Control Studies Program Working Papers Series L Introduction During the Second World War, American and British armored units fought against the same foe on the same ground using the same equipment. American effectiveness improved dramatically in three years of active operations. British effectiveness improved at a much slower rate during their five years of activity. By 1944, American units were more adept at employing combined arms in concert to achieve a variety of ends, attacking with greater flexibility, and following up tactical success to reap operational and strategic benefits. Why did these military organizations learn and improve at different rates? This question is of more than historical interest. It helps us understand the more fundamental question of how large and complex organizations "learn" lessons and adapt to new circumstances. This paper examines three candidate explanations
    [Show full text]
  • History from the Middle: the Case of the Second World War* I
    History from the Middle: The Case of the Second World War* I Paul Kennedy Abstract Writing on modern warfare lately has tended to focus upon two vital but divergent trends, which might be termed the War from Above and War from Below schools of analysis. This essay concentrates instead upon the middle levels of warfare, drawing examples from mid-World War Two, where the chief operational objectives of the Allies were clearly established (at Casablanca, January 1943), but had yet to be realized. The realization of such military goals as defeat of the U-boat threat, or gaining domination of the air over Europe, in turn required breakthroughs that could only come from what one might term “the mid- level managers of war”-inventors, scientists, civil servants, captains of naval squadrons, and commanders of air groups. Scholars of these campaigns have long recognized the importance of the changes that occurred at the operational level of war between 1943 and 1944; this essay offers a larger synthetic analysis of their argument. his paper, in the memory of George C. Marshall’s extraordinary role as the greatest of the Grand Alliance’s generals-cum-politicians, concentrates upon, andT develops a theory about, the operational and tactical history of the middle * Being the 2009 Annual George C. Marshall Foundation Lecture, sponsored by the George C. Marshall Foundation and the Society for Military History, and delivered at the annual meet- ing of the American Historical Association, in New York, Sunday, 4 January 2009. Paul Kennedy is the Director of International Security Studies and the J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maritime Archaeology of Duplex Drive Tanks in the United Kingdom
    The Maritime Archaeology of Duplex Drive Tanks in the United Kingdom Thomas Cousins Bournemouth University, UK [email protected] Thomas Harrison MSDS Marine, UK [email protected] Dave Parham Bournemouth University, UK [email protected] Abstract The catastrophe at Dieppe in 1942, where unsupported infantry attempted to capture a fortified beachhead, showed the allied forces how difficult such a venture was. As part of the invasion plan for what became Operation NEPTUNE or the Normandy landings, the allied staff saw the need for armoured support for the first waves of troops ashore. This need evolved into the concept of ‘swimming tanks’ that would land a few minutes ahead of the first infantry waves. The development of such a weapon was undertaken in conditions of absolute secrecy in the UK from late 1942 onwards. This secrecy led to the destruction of much of the historical records that relate to these armoured vehicles, leaving a confused and largely unknown record of what was an important aspect of WWII. This project sets out to record the known examples of such vehicles on the coast of the UK including a group lost as part of ‘Exercise SMASH’, the largest live ammunition exercise of the war, a full scale beach assault training exercise with all supporting arms including amphibious tanks. Though six tanks were lost during the exercise in conditions, which are not fully understood, the loss led to the changing of the operational plans for D-Day. Using archaeological and historic data, this project offers an alternative interpretation for these loses and provides a better understanding of their subsequent impact on Operation NEPTUNE.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dunblane Museum Project
    A Dunblane Museum Project CONTENTS Introduction 05 What was the Atlantic Wall 07 Who built the Wall? 08 Why are there Atlantic Walls in the UK? 09 Where are the other UK Walls? 11 Intelligence – finding out about the real wall 12 Hobart’s Funnies 14 The Anti Concrete Committee: what was their role? 16 What we know about the Sherffmuir Wall 18 Local Information 20 Sources 26 Glossary 27 Further reading 27 Acknowledgements 28 One section of the Sheriffmuir Wall as it looks now The concrete was reinforced with metal bars. 01 (2014). Laser scanning shows more detail and 02 The success of an explosive device could be will even be able to render the wall to show it in its measured by how deformed the metal bars were. original state. Image: Wardrop and Crockett Image: Wardrop and Crockett INTRODUCTION The existence of a replica of the Atlantic Wall on the Sheriffmuir Hills above Dunblane seems to have remained something of a secret for over 70 years. It has been recorded and listed as an historic monument. However, locals still seem to know very little about it. Some ten years ago the husband of one of our museum volunteers mentioned that he had been in Dunblane in 1943 working on the construction of the wall at Sheriffmuir. In August 2012 Gordon sent us a letter about his time in Dunblane. He apologises that his memory is not as clear as it once was: 49th Division came to Scotland in July 1943 for training in its role of assault division for the Normandy landings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Change
    1 The Management of Change - Mechanizing the British Regular and Household Cavalry Regiments 1918 -1942 Roger Edward Salmon DMS., BA (Hons). A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2013 This work or any part thereof has not been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or any other purposes. Save for any express acknowledgements, references and/or biblographies cited in this work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Roger Edward Salmon to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature………………………………………………………… Date……………………………………………………………….. 2 Abstract The mechanization of British Cavalry regiments took place between the two World Wars and on into 1942. This thesis describes the process by which horsed cavalrymen were re-trained in armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) and the experiences of some of the regiments managing this change. Extensive use has been made of the oral testimonies of many of the soldiers involved, a number of whom are still living, as well as regimental and War Office archives. The reason given for the delay in cavalry mechanization, cited in some military histories, much influenced by Sir Basil Liddell Hart, was resistance from the cavalry to parting from their horses.
    [Show full text]
  • Destructivity: a Political Economy of Military Effectiveness in Conventional Combat
    Destructivity: a Political Economy of Military Effectiveness in Conventional Combat by Charles A. Miller Department of Political Science Duke University Date: Approved Peter Feaver, Co-Supervisor Christopher Gelpi, Co-Supervisor Joseph Grieco David Soskice Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School at Duke University 2013 Abstract Destructivity: a Political Economy of Military Effectiveness in Conventional Combat by Charles A. Miller Department of Political Science Duke University Date: Approved Peter Feaver, Co-Supervisor Christopher Gelpi, Co-Supervisor Joseph Grieco David Soskice An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School at Duke University 2013 Copyright by Charles A. Miller 2013 Abstract Neither technological nor numerical superiority accounts for the outcome of most battles. Instead, some intangible factor has historically mattered more. The political science literature has termed this factor ‘military effectiveness’, yet using this phrase to refer solely to efficiency in one of the many tasks militaries are asked to perform can be dangerous. Armies which are good at conventional combat may be less effective at internal security, for instance. I therefore propose a new term ‘destructivity’ to refer exclusively to military effectiveness in high intensity, conventional warfare. Previous literature has suggested a number of factors which may account for variation between states in their levels of destructivity. Wealth, human capital, regime type, ethnic heterogeneity, culture and the external pressures of the international system have all been suggested by past scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Normandy Landings from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Coordinates: 49°20′N 0°34′W Normandy landings From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Normandy landings (codenamed Operation Neptune) were the landing Normandy landings operations on Tuesday, 6 June 1944 (termed Part of Operation Overlord, Invasion of D­Day) of the Allied invasion of Normandy in Normandy Operation Overlord during World War II. The largest seaborne invasion in history, the operation began the liberation of German­ occupied northwestern Europe from Nazi control, and contributed to the Allied victory on the Western Front. Planning for the operation began in 1943. In the months leading up to the invasion, the Allies conducted a substantial military deception, codenamed Operation Bodyguard, to mislead the Germans as to the date and Men of the 16th Infantry Regiment, U.S. 1st location of the main Allied landings. The Infantry Division wade ashore on Omaha weather on D­Day was far from ideal, but Beach on the morning of 6 June 1944 postponing would have meant a delay of at least two weeks, as the invasion planners had Date June 6, 1944 requirements for the phase of the moon, the Location Normandy, France tides, and the time of day that meant only a Result [9] few days in each month were deemed suitable. Decisive Allied victory Adolf Hitler placed German Field Marshal Territorial Five Allied beachheads Erwin Rommel in command of German forces changes established in Normandy and of developing fortifications along the Belligerents Atlantic Wall in anticipation of an Allied invasion. United Germany[8] Kingdom[1] The amphibious landings were preceded by United extensive aerial and naval bombardment and States[1] an airborne assault—the landing of 24,000 American, British, and Canadian airborne Canada[1] troops shortly after midnight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Rats Association New Sletter 2015-16 Where Have We Come From? in 1938, Maj Gen Percy Hobart Flew to Egypt to “Creat
    The Desert Rats Association was involved initially with border raids push on Tripoli that it too became an New sletter 2015-16 against the Italian Army, then mobile Independent Armoured Brigade and battles against the Deutsches Afrika adopted the 'Black Rat' emblem. After Korps and the Italians. In Nov 1941, it the completion of the North African took part in Operation CRUSADER, campaign, the Brigade landed in Scilly, culminating in the bloody battles then mainland Italy before returning to around Sidi Rezegh where the Division England in Jan 1944 to prepare for was virtually destroyed defending the Operation OVERLORD. From Where have we come from? airfield. Normandy, 4 Brigade, as part of 21st In 1938, Maj Gen Percy Hobart flew Army Group, fought its way in to to Egypt to “Create an Armoured In Jan 1942, 7th Armoured Brigade Germany, over the Rhine and up into Division” from the Cairo Cavalry deployed to the Far East to fight the Hamburg. In Mar 1948 it was Brigade. The Brigade deployed to Japanese Imperial Army in Burma. disbanded, but was reformed in 1981 Western Egypt to conduct training and With great skill the Brigade covered the in Munster, West Germany. became known as the “Mobile general retreat from Rangoon, the Division.” Its order of battle was a Light defence of the oil fields Armoured Brigade, a Heavy Armoured at Mandalay and then conducted Brigade and a Pivot Group (Artillery operations on the Indian border. In and Motorised Infantry). 1943 it returned to the Middle East, serving in Iraq, Syria and In Feb 1940 the Mobile Division was then Egypt before deploying to Italy in officially re-designated the May 1944, as an Independent Armoured Brigade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for Manoeuvre the English Manoeuvre Warfare Theories and British Military Thought 1920–1991
    NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE THE QUEST FOR MANOEUVRE THE ENGLISH MANOEUVRE WARFARE THEORIES AND BRITISH MILITARY THOUGHT 1920–1991. Thesis Major Juha Mälkki General Staff Officer Course 49 Army June 2002 ii THE QUEST FOR MANOEUVRE THE ENGLISH MANOEUVRE WARFARE THEORIES AND BRITISH MILITARY THOUGHT 1920–1991. 1 MODERN INTERPRETATION OF HISTORICAL THEORIES 1 1.1 Definition of Concepts 5 1.2 Sources, Hypotheses and Questions 9 1.3 The Duality Within the Western Military Thought 16 2 THE EVOLUTION OF MANOEUVRE WARFARE THEORIES DURING THE INTERWAR PERIOD 20 2.1 Two Apostles of Armoured Warfare 25 2.2 The Tactical Level Thoughts 33 2.3 The Strategic Level Ideas 38 2.4 Psychological Factors Inside the Tactical and Strategic Level Considerations 42 3 THE PROCESS OF THE BRITISH ARMY MECHANISATION AND ITS FOREIGN “COMPETITORS” UNTIL THE SECOND WORLD WAR 45 3.1 The Triumph of Mobile Firepower during the 1920s 48 3.2 The Prospering Tactical Ideas and the Mechanisation Process during the 1930s 53 3.3 The Simultaneous Development of Armoured Warfare Ideas in Other Countries: Some Observations 59 4 THE SECOND WORLD WAR – THE FOCAL TRAITS OF THE BRITISH WAY IN WARFARE 64 4.1 The Policy of Limited Liability – The Way to Dunkirk? 67 4.2 British Army Implications of Manoeuvre Warfare During The First Years of War 71 4.3 British Respond to the Threat of Deutsches Africa Korps – Montgomery of Alamein 77 iii 4.3 Operation Market-Garden – An Application of Indirect Approach? 84 4.4 The Features of the “British Fashion of War” During the Second World War 88 4 THE
    [Show full text]
  • Notes & Queries Notes & Queries
    CADHAS Notes & Queries Campden & District Historical and Archæological Society Regd. Charity No. 1034379 NOTES & QUERIES NOTES & QUERIES Volume VI: No. 6 Gratis Spring 2011 ISSN 1351-2153 Contents Page Letters to the Editor 70 Thomas Bravell 1616-1655, A Little Known Hero of the Civil War in Dorset Eve Edwards 72 “Then There Was The School” Margaret Fisher & Pearl Mitchell 75 The Griffin family of Broad Campden Cheryl Griffin 77 A Forgotten Worthy: Dr. Robert Payne Smith, Dean of Canterbury Donald Holdsworth 79 From The Editor This is the sixth issue of the current volume of Notes & Queries and we shall start a new Volume VII in the autumn. Thank you all for sending your various researches and queries. This issue seems to have developed a mind of its own, as it is all about people. Interesting pieces have been included about two personalities from different eras, both born in Campden, each with clerical connections and one by Donald Holdsworth, past Chairman of CADHAS. We have the next installment of the Ebrington School story and two articles are a direct result of assistance given to enquirers. CADHAS’s various ongoing and past projects - the parish register transcriptions, graveyard survey, analyses of Campden wills and house history - have each contributed to these researches and our correspondence has added more ‘flesh to the previous bones’ of some people. I look forward to your further articles for future editions of Notes & Queries. Editor: C.Jackson, CADHAS Archive Room, Old Police Station, High St, Chipping Campden, Glos. GL55 6HB 69 CADHAS Notes & Queries Letters to the Editor Christmas greetings were received from several past contributors and overseas members including the Lord of Westington and Combe in Holland, see Vol.VI No.4.
    [Show full text]