The Long Secret Alliance: Uncle Sam and Pol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Long Secret Alliance: Uncle Sam and Pol The Khmer Rouge diligently documented its victims such as these, who were presumably executed soon after they were photographed. The Long SecretAlliance: Uncle Sam and Pol Pot by John Pilger he US not only helped create conditions rhat brought Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge to power in 1975, but actively supported the genocidal force, politically and financially. By January T 1980, the US was secretly funding Pol Pots exiled forces on the Thai border. The extent of this support - $85 million from 1980 to 1986 - was revealed six years later in correspondence between congressional lawyer Jonathan Winer, then counsel to Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) of the Senate Foreign Re- lations Committee, and the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation. Winer said the information had come from the Congressional Research Service (CRS). When copies of his letter were circulated, the John Pilger, based in London, has won numero~ awards for his reporting from Indochina His 1979 TV documentary, Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cumbodia, is credited with alerting much of the world to the horrors of the Pol Pot regime and the US bombing that preceded it. No: 62 Reagan admmistration was furious Then land and to ensure that Khmer Rouge bases officer of a crandestine Special Forces goup wIthout adequately explaining why, Winer were fed. CVorkmg through “Task Force code-named “Daniel Boone,” Lvhlch KIS re- repudiated the statistics, while not disput- 80” of the Thai .km~; which had liaison of- sponsible for the reconnaissance of the US ing that they had come from the CRS. In ficers with the Khmer Rouge, the Amen- bombmg of Cambodia.> By 1980. Co1 a second letter ro Noam Chomsky, how- cans ensured a constant flow of UN sup- Eiland was running KEG out of the US ever, Winer repeated the original charge, plies, Two US relief aid workers, Linda embassy in Bangkok, where it was de- which, he confirmed to me, was “abso- Mason and Roger Brown, later wrote, “The scribed as a “humanitarian” organization lureiy c0rrect.“1 Responsible for interpreting Washingron also backed satellite surveillance photos of the Khmer Rouge through the Cambodia, Eiland became a United Nations, which pro- valued source for some of Lided Pol Pots vehicle of re- Bangkok’s resident CVestern turn. Although the Khmer press corps, who referred to Rouge government ceased to him in their reports as a exist in January 1979, when “Western analyst.” Eiland’s the Vietnamese army drove it “humanitarian” duties led to out, its representatives con- his appointment as Defense tinued to occupy Cambodia’s Intelligence Agency (DI.4) UN seat. Their right to do so chief in charge of the South- ~vas defended and promoted east Asia Region, one of the by Washington as an exten- most important positions in sion of the Cold War, as a US espionage. mechanism for US revenge In November 1980, the on Vietnam, and as part of its just elected Reagan admmis- new alliance with China (Pol tration and the Khmer Rouge Pot’s principal underwriter made direct contact when Dr. and Vietnam’s ancient foe). Ray Cline, a former deput) In 1981, President Carter’s director of the CIA, secretly national security adviser, visited a Khmer Rouge opera- Zbigniew Brzezinski, said, “I Khmer Rouge instruments of torture found at Tuol Sleng school. tional headquarters inside encouraged the Chinese to Cambodia. Cline was then a support Pal Pot.”The US, he added, US Government insisted that the Khmer foreign policy adviser on President-elect winked publicly” as China sent arms to Rouge be fed the US preferred that the Reagan’s transitional team. Within a year, the Khmer Rouge through Thailand.z Khmer Rouge operation benefit from the according to Washington sources, 50 CIA credibility of an intemation- agents were running Washington’s Cambo- ally known relief operation.“3 dia operation from Thailand. The dividing With 50 CIA agents running In 1980, under US pressure, line between the international relief opera- the World Food Program tion and the US war became more and Washington’s Cambodia handed over food worth $12 more confused. For example, a Defense In- million to the Thai army to telligence Agency colonel was appointed operation from Thailand, the pass on to the Khmer Rouge. “security liaison officer” between the According to former Assistant United Nations Border Relief Operation dividing line between the Secretary of State Richard (UNBRO) and the Displaced Persons Protec- Holbrooke, “20,000 to 40,000 tion Unit (DPPU). In Washington, sources international relief operation Pol Pot guerrillas benefited.‘14 revealed him as a link between the US gov- This aid helped restore the ernment and the Khmer Rouge.6 and the US war blurred. Khmer Rouge to a fighting force, based in Thailand, from The UW as a Base which it destabilized Cambo- By 1981, a number of governments, in- As a cover for its secret war against dia for more than a decade. cluding US allies, became decidedly uneasy Cambodia, Washington set up the Kampu- Although ostensibly a State Department about the charade of continued UN recog- chean Emergency Group (KEG) in the US operation, KEG’s principals were intelli- nition of Pol Pot as legitimate head of the embassy in Bangkok and on the Thai-Cam- gence officers with long experience in country. This discomfort was dramatically bodian border. KEG’s job was to “monitor” Indochina. In the early 1980s it was run by demonstrated when a colleague of mine, the distribution of Western humanitarian Michael Eiland, whose career underscored Nicholas Claxton, entered a bar at the UN supplies sent to the refugee camps in Thai- the continuity of American intervention in in New York with Thaoun Prasith, Pol Pot’s Indochina. In 1969-70, he was operations representative. “Within minutes,” said 1. Letters from Jonathan Winer to Lany Chartienes, Viet- nam Veterans of America, citing Congressional Research 3. Linda Mason and Roger Brown, Rtie, Riualy and Poli- Service. Oct. 22,1%36. Letter from Winer to Noam Chomsb, 112~ Managing Cambodian Relit# (South Bend, [N: Uni- 5.williamshawc~sideduno:Nizon,KicsingerundIhe June 16. 1987. Telephone communication%ith author, versity of Notre Dame Press, 1983), pp. 135, 159. Dedbuetion QfCIrmbcdiu &ondonz Andre Deutsch, 1979). August 1989. 4. Wtii Shawcms, The QuaMy of Metqy: Cmbmiiu, 6. The colonel’s role was %ade plain” at a meeting with 2. Elizabeth Becker, Men the U&r MS Over (New York Holocausl and hhiern Conscience (London: Andre staffmembmsoftheSenateInte~~Commit&eeonFeb. Simon and Schuster, lQ86), p. 440. Deukch, 1%!4), pp. 289,345,395. 10,1990,accordingtoJohnPedler,~~atthemeeting 6 FALL 1997 Clayton, “the bar had emptied.” Clearly; something had to be done, In 1982, the US and China, supported by Singapore, in- vented the Coahtion of the Democratic Government of Kampuchea, which was, as Ben Kiernan pointed out, neither a coalition, nor democratic, nor a government, nor in Kampuchea.’ Rather, it was what the CIA calls “a master illusion,” Cambodia’s former ruler, Prince Norodom Sihanouk, was appointed its head; otherwise little changed. The Khmer Rouge dominated the two “non-communist” mem- bers, the Sihanoukists and the Khmer People’s National Libera- tion Front (KPNLF). From his of- fice at the UN, Pol Pot’s ambas- sador,the urbane Thaoun Prasith, continued to speak for Cambodia. A close associate of Pol Pot, he had in 1975 called on Khmer expatriates to return home, whereupon many of them “disappeared.” The United Nations was now the instrument of Cambodia’s punishment. In all its history, the world body has withheld devel- opment aid from only one Third World country: Cambodra. Not Khmer Rouge cadre in an undated photo. only did the UN - at US and Chinese insistence - deny the govern- “covert” aid estimated at $24 million to the of the US and Chinese position that the ment in Phnom Penh a seat, but the major “resistance. * Until 1990, Congress ac- Khmer Rouge be part of a settlement in international financial institutions barred cepted Solar? specious argument that US Cambodia. “It is journalists,” he said, Cambodia from all international agree- aid did not end up with or even help Pol “who have made them into demons.“9 ments on trade and communications. Even Pot and that the mass murderer’s US-sup- Weapons from West Germany, the US, the World Health Organization refused to plied allies “are not even in close proxim- and Sweden were passed on directly by aid the country At home, the US denied re- ity with them [the Khmer Rougel.“s Singapore or made under license by Char- Iigious groups export licenses for books tered Industries, which is and toys for orphans. A law dating from the owned by the Singapore gov- First World War, the Trading with the Enemy ernment. These same weap- Act, was applied to Cambodia and, of course, The “trial” of Pol Pot was a ons were captured from the Vietnam. Not even Cuba and the Soviet Khmer Rouge. The Singapore Union faced such a complete ban with no hu- wonderful Khmer Rouge connection allowed the Bush manitarian or cultural exceptions. administration to continue its By 1987, KEG had been reincarnated as theater-cum-media-event, secret aid to the “resistance.’ the Kampuchea Working Group, run by the same Col. Eiland of the Defense Intel- but was otherwise worthless. ;;;et~y$p~e;;;;;; ligence Agency The Working Group’s brief gress in 1989 banrung even was to provide battle plans, war materiel, indirect “lethal aid” ;o Pol and satellite intelligence to the so-called Military links Pot. lo In August 1990, a former member of “non-communist” members of the “resis- While Washington paid the bills and the the US Spe&l Forces disclosed that he had tance forces.” The non-communist fig leaf Thai army provided logistics support, been ordered to destroy records that allowed Congress, spurred on by an anti- Singapore, as middleman, was the main showed US munitions in Thailand going to Vietnamese zealot, then-Rep, Stephen conduit for Western arms.
Recommended publications
  • Racial Ideology and Implementation of the Khmer Rouge Genocide
    Racial Ideology and Implementation of the Khmer Rouge Genocide Abby Coomes, Jonathan Dean, Makinsey Perkins, Jennifer Roberts, Tyler Schroeder, Emily Simpson Abstract Indochina Implementation In the 1970s Pol Pot devised a ruthless Cambodian regime Communism in Cambodia began as early as the 1940s during known as the Khmer Rouge. The Khmer Rouge adopted a strong the time of Joseph Stalin. Its presence was elevated when Pol Pot sense of nationalism and discriminated against the Vietnamese and became the prime minister and leader of the Khmer Rouge. In 1975, other racial minorities in Cambodia. This form of radical Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge implemented their new government communism led to the Cambodian genocide because the Khmer the Democratic Kampuchea. This government was meant to replace Rouge cleansed the minorities of their culture and committed mass the existing one in every way possible by any means necessary. murder amongst their people in order to establish power. Pol Pot The Khmer Rouge imposed a forced cleansing of Cambodia, both in established the Democratic Kampuchea which forced what he culture and race. This meant that the Cambodian minorities were to called the “New People” to work on the farms and in the factories. be weeded out, tortured, and murdered. This was called the Four The Khmer Rouge went as far as to convert the schools into Year Plan. prisons and destroyed all traces of books and equipment to rid The Khmer Rouge started by separating the minority groups Cambodia of their education system. This project will analyze how within the country. The Khmer Rouge wedged a division between Pol Pot’s regime created systematic racism amongst the the urban and rural populations, categorizing between the “New Cambodian minorities and developed a social hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • June 21, 1975 Conversation Between Chinese Leader Mao Zedong and Cambodian Leader Pol Pot
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 21, 1975 Conversation between Chinese leader Mao Zedong and Cambodian Leader Pol Pot Citation: “Conversation between Chinese leader Mao Zedong and Cambodian Leader Pol Pot,” June 21, 1975, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, CWIHP Working Paper 22, "77 Conversations." http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/111267 Summary: Mao Zedong muses on the nature of the struggle between the capitalist and socialist forces within China. He tells Pol Pot not to blindly follow the Chinese model, but adopt Marxist theory to the Cambodian realities. Excepts. Original Language: Chinese Contents: English Translation MAO ZEDONG AND POL POT Beijing, 21 June 1975 [Mao Zedong:] During the transition from the democratic revolution to adopting a socialist path, there exist two possibilities: one is socialism, the other is capitalism. Our situation now is like this. Fifty years from now, or one hundred years from now, the struggle between two lines will exist. Even ten thousand years from now, the struggle between two lines will still exist. When Communism is realized, the struggle between two lines will still be there. Otherwise, you are not a Marxist. This is unity existing among opposites. If one only mentions one side of the two, that is metaphysics. I believe in what Marx and Lenin have said, that the path [of advance] would be tortuous. From the era of Lenin to the era of Khrushchev and Brezhnev, the Soviet Union has changed. But in the future it is certain that it will return to Lenin’s path. China is also like this.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Course of Pol Pot: How His Early Life Influenced the Crimes He Committed
    Scientific THE LIFE COURSE OF POL POT: HOW HIS EARLY LIFE INFLUENCED THE CRIMES HE COMMITTED Myra de Vries1* Maartje Weerdesteijn** ABSTRACT International criminology focuses mostly on the lower level perpetrators even though it finds the leader is crucial for orchestrating the circumstances in which these people kill. While numerous theories from ordinary criminology have been usefully applied to these lower level perpetrators, the applicability of these theories to the leaders has remained underexplored. In order to fill this gap, the life course theory of Sampson and Laub will be applied to Pol Pot whose brutal communist regime cost the lives of approximately 1.7 million people. A unusual childhood, the influence of peers while he studied in Paris, and his marriage to a woman who shared his revolutionary mind-set, were all negative turning-points for Pol Pot. I. Introduction Mass violence is constructed as something extraordinary that violates cosmopolitan, and perhaps even universal, norms.2 The extraordinary nature of these crimes lies in the fact that these are very often a state-directed effort to harm or kill marginalised groups. These crimes are also referred to as “crimes of obedience,”3 since lower level perpetrators often obey high level orders unquestioningly without taking personal responsibility for the ethical repercussions.4 *Myra de Vries graduated her BSc Criminologie at Leiden University in 2012, and is currently a student in the MSc International Crimes and Criminology programme. **Maartje Weerdesteijn is an assistant professor at the department of criminology at VU University Amsterdam and researcher at the Center for International Criminal Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Khmer Rouge Practice of Thought Reform in Cambodia, 1975–1978
    Journal of Political Ideologies ISSN: 1356-9317 (Print) 1469-9613 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjpi20 Converts, not ideologues? The Khmer Rouge practice of thought reform in Cambodia, 1975–1978 Kosal Path & Angeliki Kanavou To cite this article: Kosal Path & Angeliki Kanavou (2015) Converts, not ideologues? The Khmer Rouge practice of thought reform in Cambodia, 1975–1978, Journal of Political Ideologies, 20:3, 304-332, DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2015.1075266 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2015.1075266 Published online: 25 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjpi20 Download by: [24.229.103.45] Date: 26 November 2015, At: 10:12 Journal of Political Ideologies, 2015 Vol. 20, No. 3, 304–332, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2015.1075266 Converts, not ideologues? The Khmer Rouge practice of thought reform in Cambodia, 1975–1978 KOSAL PATH Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA ANGELIKI KANAVOU Interdisciplinary Center for the Scientific Study of Ethics & Morality, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, USA ABSTRACT While mistaken as zealot ideologues of Marxist ideals fused with Khmer rhetoric, the Khmer Rouge (KR) cadres’ collective profile better fits that of the convert subjected to intense thought reform. This research combines insights from the process and the context of thought reform informed by local cultural norms with the social type of the convert in a way that captures the KR phenome- non in both its general and particular dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • People on War Reports
    PEOPLE ON WAR Country report Cambodia ICRC worldwide consultation on the rules of war Report by Greenberg Research, Inc. EVEN WARS HAVE LIMITS EVEN WARS HAVE LIMITS EVEN WARS HAVE LIMITS EVEN WARS HAVE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS About the People on War project To mark the 50th anniversary of the modern Geneva Conventions (on 12 August 1999), the ICRC launched its People on War project with the aim of building greater respect for fundamental humanitarian principles. At centre stage is a worldwide consultation giving the general public a chance to air their views on the many facets of war. The idea was that civilians and combatants alike would be able to share their experiences, express their opinions on what basic rules should apply in war, discuss why those rules sometimes break down and look at what the future holds. With this in mind, the ICRC commissioned Greenberg Research, Inc. to design a research programme that would enable people to be heard in the most effective way possible. Under the guidance of Greenberg Research, ICRC staff and Red Cross and Red Crescent volunteers carried out this consultation in 12 countries (Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cambodia, Colombia, El Salvador, Georgia/ Abkhazia, Israel, the occupied territories and the autonomous territories, Lebanon, Nigeria, Philippines, Somalia and South Africa), conducting in-depth, face-to-face interviews, group discussions and national public opinion surveys. Surveys on the basis of a questionnaire only were conducted in a further five countries (France, Russian Federation, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) in order to reflect these people’s perceptions of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Intervention: the Invasion of Cambodia
    NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 8 1980 Humanitarian Intervention: The nI vasion of Cambodia James Lutfy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lutfy, James (1980) "Humanitarian Intervention: The nI vasion of Cambodia," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol2/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION: THE INVASION OF CAMBODIA "'My people have no food, no medicine, and we are being killed,' he said, getting angrier as he went on. 'What does the United Nations mean? Why don't they do something?' "" On April 17, 1975, the bombing finally stopped. 2 The people of Phnom Penh listened to the silence and rejoiced. They were tired of war's misery and, although they did not support the Khmer Rouge, 3 they enthusiastically -reeted these victors who brought with them the illusion of peace as they marched into the city. This enthusiasm was short-lived, followed by suffering of such intensity that it shocked the world. The blueprint of the Khmer Rouge called for the radical re- molding of Cambodian society. 4 The Khmer Rouge had "resolved to annul the past and obliterate the present... [in order] to fashion 1. N.Y. Times, Oct. 12, 1979, at AI, col.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam/Korea/Southeast Asia
    Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _______ Regents Review Ms. Carey Vietnam/Korea/Southeast Asia The Korean War and the Cuban missile crisis are most closely associated with: (1) communist aggression (2) religious tensions (3) the overthrow of monarchies (4) the failure of the Kyoto Protocol Base your answer to the following question on the map below and on your knowledge of social studies This map depicts Vietnam during which time period? (1) 19th-century imperial rule (2) World War I (3) World War II (4) Cold War Base your answer to the following question on the political cartoon below and you knowledge of social studies Which action of Kim Jong Il is the subject of this 2009 cartoon? (1) poorly managing North Korea’s economy (2) polluting North Korea with industrial waste (3) seeking humanitarian aid for North Korea (4) proposing the unification of North and South Korea _______________________________________________________________________ Since 1990, many countries have expressed grave concerns about North Korea and Pakistan because these two countries have (1) developed nuclear programs (2) withdrawn from the United Nations (3) experienced large increases in the number of AIDS-related deaths (4) adopted a communist system of government • French intent to recolonize Indo-China after World War II • United States desire to prevent the spread of communism • United States support for the French in Southeast Asia These ideas are most closely associated with the: (1) causes of the conflict in Vietnam (2) reasons for the Nationalist settlement of Taiwan (3) factors that led to the Korean War (4) results of the Marshall Plan _______________________________________________________________________ A.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Documenting the Crimes of Democratic Kampuchea
    Article by John CIORCIARI and CHHANG Youk entitled "Documenting the Crimes of Democratic Kampuchea" in Jaya RAMJI and Beth VAN SCHAAK's book "Bringing the Khmer Rouge to Justice. Prosecuting Mass Violence Before the Cambodian Courts", pp.226-227. 6 Documenting The Crimes Of Democratic Kampuchea John D. Ciorciari with Youk Chhang John D. Ciorciari (A.B., J.D., Harvard; M.Phil., Oxford) is the Wai Seng Senior Research Scholar at the Asian Studies Centre in St. Antony’s College, University of Oxford. Since 1999, he has served as a legal advisor to the Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-Cam) in Phnom Penh. Youk Chhang has served as the Director of DC-Cam since January 1997 and has managed the fieldwork of its Mass Grave Mapping Project since July 1995. He is also the Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of DC-Cam’s monthly magazine, SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH, and has edited numerous scholarly publications dealing with the abuses of the Pol Pot regime. The Democratic Kampuchea (DK) regime was decidedly one of the most brutal in modern history. Between April 1975 and January 1979, when the Communist Party of Kampuchea (CPK) held power in Phnom Penh, millions of Cambodians suffered grave human rights abuses. Films, museum exhibitions, scholarly works, and harrowing survivor accounts have illustrated the horrors of the DK period and brought worldwide infamy to the “Pol Pot regime.”1 Historically, it is beyond doubt that elements of the CPK were responsible for myriad criminal offenses. However, the perpetrators of the most serious crimes of that period have never been held accountable for their atrocities in an internationally recognized legal proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Day of Reckoning: Pol Pot Breaks an 18-Year Silence to Confront His Past
    POL POT: UNREPENTANT An Exclusive Interview By Nate Thayer Source Cover Story, Far Eastern Economic Review October 30, 1997 (Three story cover package) The world holds Pol Pot responsible for the deaths of more than 1 million Cambodians. But the former Khmer Rouge leader, now a jungle captive of ex-comrades, expresses no remorse. In an historic, exclusive interview with Nate Thayer he defends himself as a patriot. His two-hour exposition ranges over the notorious killing fields, atrocities, party intrigues and his own early life. Plus: The first ever interview with Khmer Rouge strongman Ta Mok Day of Reckoning: Pol Pot breaks an 18-year silence to confront his past. In defending his murderous rule, he sheds new light on the dark secrets of the Khmer Rouge By Nate Thayer in Anlong Veng Far Eastern Economic Review, October 30, 1997 POL POT is dying. He's helped slowly out of the backseat of a blue four-wheel drive truck, then stands unsteadily in the dust of the narrow road, smiling shyly and raising his clasped hands to his face in a traditional greeting. He needs to grasp my arm to walk the 25 meters to an open-air hut, in a clearing hacked out of the dense jungles of the Dangrek mountains. His breathing labored, he eases himself down at a simple wooden table. A deferential young KR cadre places a plastic bottle of water and a coffee jar filled with salt in front of him. Pol Pot adjusts his traditional peasant scarf, his face drawn and eyes blinking rapidly, and looks sadly across the table at the nearest thing to an interrogator he has ever faced.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HOXHAIST COMMUNITY PRESENTS Notes on Maoite Revisionism, Towards an Ultimate Debunking of Maoism and It’S Social-Fascist Adherents
    1 THE HOXHAIST COMMUNITY PRESENTS Notes On Maoite Revisionism, Towards An Ultimate Debunking of Maoism And It’s Social-Fascist Adherents Study Packet For Comrades and for Maoites Looking For A Principled Confutation of Maoism This long overdue and highly important writing and re-examination into the effects of revisionism in China and its impact today could not have been possible devoid of the massive help of fellow Hoxhaist comrades who contributed to their utmost ability and their time and efforts into making this possible, particular, there’s a massive necessity of giving thanks to our dearest comrade, the Hoxhaist Warrior, who wrote an entire section here based on the far-reaching research they themselves have done on contemporary revolutionary movements, specifically Maoite ones, and we once again are very much appreciative of his work. Part One: Chinese Revisionism: A Result Of None Other Than Mao By The Raging Stalinist The Rise of Mao in The Communist Party Mao Zedong was born, and on December 26, 1893 to a well-off peasant family. It has been said that his ancestors had lived in the region for around 500 years. So this was a place familiar to Mao. It was a beautiful place, full of luscious trees, forests, hills, and mountains. Mao was the third son to his mother and father, but only the first one to actually be healthful enough to survive beyond his youth.[1] Mao disliked his father a lot[2], but being the kind of person he was, he consistently asked ​ ​ ​ ​ him for money, time and time again[3].
    [Show full text]
  • TIRR-Vol-1.-Jul-2021.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE EFFECT OF COVID-19 ON CHINA AND CHILE’S ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP Rachel Farmer ................................................................ 4 EXPLAINING THE BREAKDOWN OF VIETNAMESE-KHMER ROUGE RELATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE CONTEXT OF THE COLD WAR Bayley Murray ........................................................................................ 12 NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT: RUSSIA’S ROLE IN SHAPING THE GEOPOLITICS OF SOUTH CAUCASUS Darine Razmadze ....... 26 RETHINKING THE “LOSS OF CHINA”: US INVOLVEMENT IN THE CHINESE CIVIL WAR, 1945-1949 Nathaniel Sher ............................. 39 TSINGHUA INTERNATIONAL Vol. 01 July 2021 RELATIONS REVIEW THE EFFECT OF COVID-19 ON CHINA AND CHILE’S ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP RACHEL FARMER Since establishing diplomatic relations in 1971, China’s and Chile’s economic ties have grown rapidly. With its strategic location and over 4,000 kilometers of Pacific coastline, China views Chile as its door to Latin America.① Following the signing of a Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and China’s expanding search for natural resources, economic relations between the two countries have continued to strengthen in recent years,② with China becoming Chile’s largest trading partner, and Chile becoming China’s third largest Latin American trading partner, behind Brazil and Mexico.③ In 2019, China’s export trade value to Chile surpassed $16.5 billion, and Chile’s export trade value to China surpassed $22.5 billion. As one of the largest consumers of natural resources in the world, China’s interest in Chile, the world’s largest producer of copper, is understandable. China is the main market for Chilean copper, and also imports other mineral and agricultural products.④ According to recent figures, China receives more than 47 percent of Chile’s total mining exports.⑤ China also exports heavily to Chile, though generally in terms of manufactured goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Words from Budapest
    g. m. tamás Interview WORDS FROM BUDAPEST Your trajectory has been an unusual one: a dissident libertarian philosopher under Communism in both Romania and Hungary, who has emerged as one of the foremost left critics of the capitalist order in eastern Europe, and author of a striking set of essays on the historical and cultural legacies and contem- porary dynamics of the region. Could we start by asking about your original personal and intellectual formation, in Gheorghiu-Dej’s and Ceau‚sescu’s Romania? nswering this question borders on the impossible, since the whole context which might explain it has gone. I was born in 1948, in what Hungarians call Kolozsvár and Romanians, Cluj. The principal city of Transylvania, it had Abeen transferred from Hungary to Romania in 1920 by the Treaty of Trianon, awarded back to Horthy’s Hungary by Hitler in 1940, and was under direct Nazi occupation from early 1944 until the arrival of Soviet forces, when it was incorporated into Romania again. Both my parents were Communists. They had come back from the War broken and bitter. My father, a Hungarian writer, was dispatched from prison to the front, where he was seriously wounded—he walked on crutches, later with a sturdy walking-stick, which I still have—by those whom he consid- ered his comrades: the Red Army. My mother, ironically, escaped being deported to Auschwitz because she was in jail as a seditious Bolshevik. But her mother and her favourite elder brother were killed. My father’s family belonged to the petty nobility, or rather yeomanry, in the moun- tainous Szekler region of East Transylvania; his father was a tailor in a small town.
    [Show full text]