DOCSLIB.ORG

The Cambodia Peace Settlement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE Simulation on The Cambodia Peace Settlement This simulation aims at providing participants with a deeper understanding of how societies in conflict have to confront issues of war crimes and human rights violations. Participants role-play negotiators at a peace settlement conference in Cambodia, where, due to international pressure, a weakened government has agreed to negotiate with opposition leaders. Questions that must be dealt with include implementation of the peace settlement and issues of past accountability for genocide and war crimes. Other participants will be asked to role-play a task force composed of representatives from Cambodian and international organizations that has been established to work out recommendations for the negotiators on how to how to proceed with the war crimes and human rights issues. The range of possible recommendations includes convening international or domestic war crime tribunals, limited or blanket amnesties, or the establishment of a truth commission or commission of inquiry. Simulation on The Cambodia Peace Settlement Simulation on The Cambodia Peace Settlement 1 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................... 3 Materials............................................................................................ 5 Scenario ............................................................................................ 6 Background ...................................................................................... 9 Early History..................................................................................................................9 The Khmer Kingdoms: Funan and Chenla ............................................................................ 9 The Angkor Empire................................................................................................................. 9 Foreign Domination................................................................................................................. 9 The Sihanouk Era .........................................................................................................9 Lon Nol and the Khmer Rouge....................................................................................10 The Khmer Rouge Years: 1975-1979 .........................................................................10 Human Rights in Cambodia: 1979-1993.....................................................................12 Peace and the Supreme National Council............................................................................ 13 Cambodia 1993-1997..................................................................................................14 Roles................................................................................................ 17 Group A.......................................................................................................................18 Hun Sen ................................................................................................................................ 19 Ieng Mouly ............................................................................................................................ 20 Prince Norodom Ranariddh .................................................................................................. 21 Sam Rainsy........................................................................................................................... 22 ASEAN Representative Rodolfo Certeza Severino .............................................................. 23 Representative of the United States Government, Ambassador Charlotte Tormey............. 24 Representative of the Chinese Government, Ambassador Wai Cheng ............................... 25 Group B.......................................................................................................................26 Ka Chon, representative, Cambodian Mothers for Justice................................................... 27 Arn Sudvay, Buddhist Monk.................................................................................................. 28 Chea Chorn, representative of Cambodian refugees ........................................................... 29 Hu Vet, Member of Cambodians for Justice......................................................................... 30 Ieng Yat, Cambodian judge .................................................................................................. 31 Toch Nim, retired Army General ........................................................................................... 32 Quan Pong, World Health Organization ............................................................................... 33 Advisors ......................................................................................................................34 Claire Verhaegan, Special Representative from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the High Commissioner for Refugees ................................................................ 35 Wilhelm Verwoerd, Adviser, South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.............. 36 Related Web Links.......................................................................... 37 1 All of the scenario events are imaginary and were created for the purposes of this simulation only. UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE 2 www.usip.org Simulation on The Cambodia Peace Settlement Introduction Simulations are essentially educational exercises which place students in situations of people different than themselves as a way to illuminate the kinds of issues, challenges and conflicts that such people face. When you have to think, debate or make decisions as a Cambodian who is trying to end conflict in his or her country, for example, you often develop insights that are much more than a simple history lesson. Simulations may attempt to recreate a historical event or a hypothetical event. For this exercise, you will simulate a hypothetical event which could actually happen in a similar fashion and which will deal with real problems that are being confronted now in Cambodia. For the purposes of this exercise, you will be simulating the conflict in Cambodia as a way to deepen your understanding of how societies in conflict have to confront issues of war crimes and human rights violations. This simulation is also a way for you to apply and confront many of the ideas you put forth in your winning peace essays. For the simulation, each student will be assigned one of fourteen different roles and will be notified of that assigned role and group in the accompanying packet of materials. In the following pages you will be given information about the conflict in Cambodia, the specific scenario in which each of you will act within your assigned role and descriptions of all the players in the simulation. You may also be given an individualized set of guidelines or suggested strategies that is written for your particular role shortly before the simulation begins. Simulation role-players will be divided into two groups. The students in the first group (Group A) represent negotiators to a peace settlement conference in Cambodia. As you will read in the next section, violence has erupted in Cambodia during the latter half of 1998. Due to international pressure, a weakened government led by Hun Sen has agreed to negotiate with opposition leaders about a peace settlement. Much of an agreement has already emerged; so, for the simulation, only the question of implementation and the problems of past accountability, genocide and war crimes remain. The negotiators, which include Prime Minister Hun Sen and the main opposition leader Prince Norodom Ranariddh as well as other Cambodians and interested outside parties must reach several conclusions. What is the best way to implement the settlement? How should Cambodia address the issues of past war crimes and human rights violations? These negotiations will take place for the first half of the simulation. To help the negotiators with these questions, a task force (Group B) has also been established. It will meet during the first half of the simulation and make a recommendation to the negotiators for how to proceed with the war crimes and human rights issues. This task force is charged with giving the negotiators (Group A) a concrete recommendation on how to address the issues of accountability and reconciliation for Cambodian society. The range of possible recommendations includes convening war crime tribunals, either an ad hoc international tribunal or prosecution before the Cambodian courts, calling for a limited or blanket amnesty, or establishing a truth commission or commission of inquiry. The task force members should address the question of whether putting war criminals on trial is necessary for the healing of the country or whether it would create another round of radicalism and undermine the negotiated settlement. During the second half of the simulation, the task force in Group B will come together with the negotiators from Group A to present their recommendation. They will stay with Group A members to answer questions about their rationale for the recommendation, as well as provide their input as to the future of the settlement coupled with the issues of accountability. This will be not only a discussion among the members of Group A, but an interactive dialogue between all simulation participants. It is expected that the task force members
Recommended publications
  • Cambodia Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report #2 13 July 2020 Report As of 13 July 2020, 11:30 Am ICT

    Cambodia Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report #2 13 July 2020 Report As of 13 July 2020, 11:30 Am ICT

    Cambodia Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report #2 13 July 2020 Report as of 13 July 2020, 11:30 am ICT Situation Summary Highlights of Current Situation Report • As of 13 July 2020, 156 confirmed cases of COVID-19 have been reported from Cambodia to WHO, of which 133 have recovered. 118 cases were acquired overseas, representing 10 nationalities in addition to Cambodian, with the rest locally acquired. Eight patients are currently being treated in Khmer Soviet Friendship Hospital and 15 at Chakangre Health Centre, both in Phnom Penh. • 79 contacts are being monitored daily over 14 days for possible development of symptoms through automatic voice calls using the 115 hotline system. • The 15 most recent cases identified on 12 July are Cambodian men between the ages of 21 and 33, who travelled from Saudi Arabia and were detected as a result of extensive airport screening measures for all incoming passengers. • Points of Entry measures are currently being strictly implemented including testing on arrival and 14-day quarantine for all airport passengers and at border crossings. • Joint high-level field missions, led by the Secretary of State, Ministry of Health (MOH) and the WHO Representative, have been undertaken to the north eastern and to the north western regions (total 7 provinces) to assess and advise on strengthening provincial-level preparedness and response. Upcoming Events and Priorities • On 15 July, the Ministry of the Interior will host a high-level meeting between the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) key institutions and the UN Country Team (UNCT) on the joint programme to support returning migrants during COVID-19.
  • Hun Sen's Talks and Cambodia's Tourism Development: The

    Hun Sen's Talks and Cambodia's Tourism Development: The

    Hun Sen’s Talks and Cambodia’s Tourism Development: the Discourse of Power Vannarith Chheang1 Summary This paper discusses the talks/speeches made by the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen in respect of tourism development policies in Cambodia. Thirty eight speeches were identified and analyzed using textual analysis and the discourse of power. Nine factors to develop tourism were found discussed: security and safety for tourists; infrastructure and tourism facilities development; stakeholder collaboration; cultural heritage preservation; environmental protection; human resources development; tourism products marketing and promotion; simplification of travel procedures; and regional cooperation. Introduction Tourism is a highly political phenomenon, the implications of which have been only rarely perceived and almost nowhere fully understood. (Richter, 1989: 2) Tourism studies have developed over the last few decades. Many approaches have been developed from different disciplines to examine and explain the tourism phenomenon. However, there is little literature on tourism from the political science perspective (Hall, 1994:1). The seminal studies of the politics of tourism include the works of Elliott (1997), Hall (1994), Hall and Jenkins (1995), Jeffries (2001), Matthews, 1975, 1978, and Richter (1989). These studies mainly focus on the state and the use of power in managing and mismanaging tourism. The discourse of power is one of the starting points for looking at tourism from a political perspective. For instance, Xiao (2006) analyzes five talks made by Deng Xiaoping in respect to tourism development in China. In a similar vein, this paper attempts to analyze the speeches and talks made by the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen which are pertinent to tourism development in Cambodia.
  • Khmer Civilization in Isan Khemita Visudharomn School of Architecture, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand

    Khmer Civilization in Isan Khemita Visudharomn School of Architecture, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand

    AU J.T. 8(4): 178-184 (Apr. 2005) Khmer Civilization in Isan Khemita Visudharomn School of Architecture, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand Abstract Follow the footsteps of Khmer civilization from Angkor Wat to the center of cultural heritage in northeastern Thailand, Phimai, Phanom Rung and Mueang Tam. This paper is both an introduction and guide to Khmer temples in Isan. The first part begins with historical details tracing the Angkorean from the 8th to 12th century, and introduces a background to the religious traditions of the Khmer, which both inspired and governed the concept and execution of all their art and architecture. The second part is an emphasis on architecture and decorative art, which appear in Khmer temples. In its heyday the main concentration of Khmer temples extended far west to the border and associated with an area of the middle Mekong River in the southern part of northeastern Thailand. Keywords: cultural heritage, Phimai, Phanom Rung, Mueang Tam, the Angkorean, religious traditions, architecture and decorative art 1. Introduction The other sources of information on this period are Chinese accounts and references, in The name “Isan” refers to the these to tributary states such as Funan and northeastern part of Thailand .It covers an area Chenla. of one third of the Kingdom. Isan, is also th th known as the Khorat Plateau. The Phetchabun 2.1 Angkorean (8 - 12 century) Rage separates Isan from the Central Region while the Dongrek Mountains in the south The art and architecture of the Khmer has separate Thailand from Cambodia. The Mun been classified into periods, by French art and Chi Rivers drain the majority of the historians.
  • Intelligence Memorandum

    Intelligence Memorandum

    Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 ,E .._, ....,, TolLSect:ef: -1L_____ -------' 3.5(c) DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum CAMBODIAANDTHE VIETNAMESE COMMUNISTS ... 3.5(c) 3.5(c) 29 January 1968 I Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 3.5(c) Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 3.5(c) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence 29 January 1968 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM Cambodia and the Vietnamese Communists A Monthly Report Contents I. Military Developments: Communist battal~ ion and regimental size units continue to operate in Cambodian territory (Paras. 1-5). It is clear that North Vietnamese forces have had bases in the Cam­ bodian salient since mid-1965 (Paras. 6-8). The salient, however, has never been one of the major Communist base areias .in Cambodia (Paras. 9-12). A 3.3(h)(2) Cambodian~-----~ reports Communist units in South Vietnam are receiving Chinese arms and ammuni­ tion from Cambodian stocks (Paras. 13--16) . More reports have been received on Cambodian rice sales to the Corru:nunists (Paras. 17-20). Cambodian smug­ glers are supplying explosive chemicals to the Viet Cong (Para. 21). II. Poli ti cal Developments: Sihanouk"' con­ cerned over possible allied action against Communists in Cambodia for sanctuary, has reverted to diplomacy to settle the cris:is (Paras. 22-27). Sihanouk has again attempted to get a satisfactory border declara­ tion from the US (Para. 28). Cambodia, still believ­ ing the Communists will prevail in South Vietnam, sees short-term advantages to an opening to the West (Para.
  • Political Paper of the Revolutionary Commun.Ist League of Britain

    Political Paper of the Revolutionary Commun.Ist League of Britain

    CLASS STRUGGLE POLITICAL PAPER OF THE REVOLUTIONARY COMMUN.IST LEAGUE OF BRITAIN On Christmas Day 1978, the Vietnamese Government launch­ ed 120,000 troops in a massive blitzkrieg against Kampuchea. In the year that has followed, 200,000 in­ creasingly demoralised and hard-pressed Vietnamese troops have been resorting to all the most inhuman methods of war of their old enemies, ~he US imperialists - destruction of crops, chemical warfare, creation of a vast refugee problem, etc. The incredible - the tragic - has happened. Vietnam has changed colour . Its socialist path has changed to a reactionary path. Vietnam now has its own Vietnam. NEW LIES FOR OLD At first the Vietnamese Government claimed that their puppet administration headed by Heng Samrin had been installed by a "popular uprising". However, when, after some months, their massive military presence proved difficult to hid@ even from the blindest of observers, they changed their tune and claimed that the troops had been "invited" by Heng Samrin (whom they had put there 'We have entered in the first place !) and that their interv~ntion is for and who oppose war, must stand up too. "humanitarian" reasons. OPPOSE GENOCIDE THE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION MUST BE DEFENDED There is another vital reason for demanding the with­ The Vietnamese invasion must be opposed . All countries drawal of Viet~m. In one year Vietnam has caused the and people who stand for the right of nations to inde­ death of over 1 ,000,000 Kampucheans through violent pendence and for the right of peoples to determine their assault and through starvation.
  • Cambodia: Human Rights Before and After the Elections

    Cambodia: Human Rights Before and After the Elections

    May 1993 Vol.5 No.10 CAMBODIA: HUMAN RIGHTS BEFORE AND AFTER THE ELECTIONS I. INTRODUCTION Cambodians will go to the polls on May 23 in an atmosphere of political and ethnic violence and renewed civil war. The elections are the culmination of a 17-month United Nations presence, the largest, most ambitious and most expensive peace-keeping effort ever, which was supposed to bring about an end to the conflict. Instead, Cambodia is faced with as much fighting as when the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC) entered the country in March 1992, and a spiralling level of serious human rights abuses. The "neutral political environment" that was supposed to be the precondition for elections is entirely absent. The five permanent members of the Security Council and other drafters of the 1991 Paris peace accords, formally known as the Agreements on a Comprehensive Political Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict, are determined to go ahead with the elections regardless. But what happens on May 23 is almost less important than what happens in the days after the results are announced. Asia Watch believes that an analysis of the missteps that led to the current human rights situation is critically important to determining how, or perhaps whether, human rights of Cambodians can be protected under whatever government comes to power then. The reasons for the deterioration in the human rights situation in late 1992 and early 1993 are complex. None of the parties to the conflict has a history of respect for human rights and one, Democratic Kampuchea, better known as the Khmer Rouge, has one of the worst human rights records in modern history.
  • December 04, 1979 Conversation Between Jambyn Batmunkh and Heng Samrin

    December 04, 1979 Conversation Between Jambyn Batmunkh and Heng Samrin

    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 04, 1979 Conversation between Jambyn Batmunkh and Heng Samrin Citation: “Conversation between Jambyn Batmunkh and Heng Samrin,” December 04, 1979, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Mongol Ulsyn Zasgiin Gazryn Arkhiv: fond 1, tov’yog 28, kh/n 21 (1980 on), khuu 10-22. Obtained and translated by Sergey Radchenko with the assistance of Onon Perenlei. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/208467 Summary: In December 1979 Mongolian party and government delegation headed by the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Mongolia Jambyn Batmunkh visited Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos and had held talks with the leaders of these countries on issues pertinent to the Sino-Vietnamese war of 1979, Pol Pot’s regime, situation in Indochina and Chinese foreign policy in Asia. Original Language: Mongolian Contents: English Translation RECORD OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN DELEGATIONS OF THE MPR AND THE PRK [People’s Republic of Kampuchea] 4 December 1979 Phnom Penh MPR party and government delegation headed by the member of the MPRP Central Committee Politburo, Chairman of the MPR Council of Minister c. J. Batmunkh on that day met in Phnom Penh with the Chairman of the Central Committee of the Kampuchean National United Front for National Salvation (KNUFNS), Chairman of the PRK’s People’s Revolutionary Council c. Heng Samrin. […] The conversation began in the PRK Government Building at 9:45 local time and lasted for 3 and-a- half hours. […] Heng Samrin: Head of the MPR party and government delegation, esteemed Chairman Batmunkh, members of the delegation! First of all, allow me to congratulate warmly the MPR party and government delegation on accepting the invitation of the KNUFNS and the PRK People’s Revolutionary Council and arriving in our country on a friendly visit.
  • Vietnamese and Cambodian Refugee Crisis Cecilia Bobbitt, Paige Amico, Emily Poehlein, Sara Seper, Megan Caveny, Bianca Zarrella, Shiqi Lin, Ashley Lamere

    Vietnamese and Cambodian Refugee Crisis Cecilia Bobbitt, Paige Amico, Emily Poehlein, Sara Seper, Megan Caveny, Bianca Zarrella, Shiqi Lin, Ashley Lamere

    Vietnamese and Cambodian Refugee Crisis Cecilia Bobbitt, Paige Amico, Emily Poehlein, Sara Seper, Megan Caveny, Bianca Zarrella, Shiqi Lin, Ashley LaMere Introduction and Causes of Crisis: The Vietnamese and Cambodian refugee crisis spanned from 1969 to 1973. During the 1960’s, America and Vietnam were participating in the Vietnam War, which, along with internal conflict, was responsible for the displacement of not only Vietnamese but also Cambodian people. Due to the violent conditions from the war, many Vietnamese fled the country. Many were referred to as “boat people” because they escaped by boat on a dangerous trip to refugee camps in neighboring countries like Thailand. The Vietnam war also strongly had an effect on the lives of Cambodian citizens. Cambodia served as a transport route between North and South Vietnam. Cambodia remained neutral during the war; however, they were bombed heavily due to the presence of Vietcong Army bases. In 1975, a communist group called the Khmer Rouge that was led by Pol Pot took control of Cambodia and attempted to create an agrarian utopia. Cities were evacuated and destroyed. 1.5 million Cambodians (~20% of the country’s population) was murdered by the Khmer Rouge. In 1979, the Vietnamese army invaded Cambodia, causing many to flee the country to refugee camps in Thailand. Over 100,000 refugees relocated in the United States. Lived Experiences of Refugees: https://www.ted.com/talks/tan_le_my_immigration_story?language=en https://www.ted.com/talks/sophal_ear_escaping_the_khmer_rouge The Life We Were Given, Dana Sachs ​ South Wind Changing, Jade Ngoc Quang Huynh ​ US Government Response to the Refugee Crisis: On April 28th, 1970 President Nixon approved the Cambodian incursion, against the requests of Secretary of State William Rogers and Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird.
  • Huanglongbing in Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar

    Huanglongbing in Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar

    Fourteenth IOCV Conference, 2000—Short Communications Huanglongbing in Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar M. Garnier and J. M. Bové ABSTRACT. Surveys conducted in Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar have shown that several citrus species were showing HLB-like symptoms. PCR analysis of leaf midrib samples indicated that “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” infects various citrus cultivars in all the sites visited. Diaphorina citri, the Asian psyllid vector of HLB, was also seen in Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar. Huanglongbing (HLB) has been and in Laos in 1997. The samples shown previously to be present in were brought back to Bordeaux and several south and south-east Asian tested by DNA/DNA hybridization countries, namely Bangladesh, (4) for the samples from Cambodia India, China, Vietnam, Thailand, and by PCR with primers OI1/OI2C/ and Malaysia (1) We have now OA1 (2, 3) for the samples from Laos obtained evidence for the occurrence and Myanmar. Examples of the PCR of HLB in three additional countries results are shown on Fig. 1 (top) for in South East (SE) Asia. Collection Myanmar samples. PCR results are of citrus leaf samples showing HLB- presented on Tables 1 and 2. Pum- like symptoms such as mottle were melo near Phnom Penh and Siem carried out in Cambodia in 1995, in Reap in Cambodia were found posi- Myanmar (formerly Burma) in 1996 tive by DNA/DNA hybridization TABLE 1 PCR-DETECTION OF “CANDIDATUS LIBERIBACTER ASIATICUS” IN MYANMAR Region Cultivar Sample Number PCR MANDALAY Moemeik Lime 1 + Myitngde Lime 2 2+ KALAW Mandarin seedling 3 2+ PINDAYA/ZAYDAN Mandarin/RL 4 3+ “ Rough lemon 5 2+ “Lime62+ “ Mandarin 7 3+ “ Mandarin 8 2+ “ Mandarin 9 + AUNGBAN Navel 10 + “11+ “12— INLE Kyasar Rough lemon 13 3+ “ Mandarin 14 3+ Inle Lime 15 3+ PEGU/SARLAY Pummelo 16 — “ Pummelo 17 + “Lime183+ 378 Fourteenth IOCV Conference, 2000—Short Communications 379 Fig.
  • The S. Rajaratnam Private Papers

    The S. Rajaratnam Private Papers

    The S. Rajaratnam Private Papers Folio No: SR.261 Folio Title: Articles, Newspaper Articles, Conferences – Vietnam, Cambodia 1) Hun Sen 2) Norodom Sihanouk 3) Khmer Rouge 4) Withdrawal of Vietnamese volunteer troops from Kampuchea ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS Withdrawal of Vietnamese volunteer troops from SR.261.001 Undated Digitized Open Kampuchea Withdrawal of Vietnamese volunteer troops from SR.261.002 Undated Digitized Open Kampuchea SR.261.003 1988 Law on foreign investment in Vietnam Digitized Open SR.261.004 20/12/1988 Hanoi pulls out 18,000 troops Digitized Open Vietnamese troop withdrawal from Cambodia will be SR.261.005 5/12/1988 Digitized Open definitive - minister SR.261.006 1988 Vietnam commentary Digitized Open SR.261.007 18/11/1988 Brunei-S'pore efforts on Cambodia to go on Digitized Open SR.261.008 13/10/1988 Vietnamese troop withdrawal comes to standstill Digitized Open SR.261.009 5/10/1988 Hanoi claims troop pull-out slowed by rain Digitized Open SR.261.010 8/8/1988 Hanoi's sincerity will be put to the test at UN Digitized Open SR.261.011 8/8/1988 Bogor talks seen as a breakthrough of sorts Digitized Open SR.261.012 1/8/1988 Search for a durable Kampuchean solution Digitized Open SR.261.013 29/7/1988 Khmer peace panel to be set up Digitized Open SR.261.014 29/7/1988 Dhana and Thach exchange sharp words Digitized Open 1 of 4 The S. Rajaratnam Private Papers ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS SR.261.015 22/7/1988 Fears surface as Viets begin
  • A New Date for the Phnom Da Images and Its Implications for Early Cambodia

    A New Date for the Phnom Da Images and Its Implications for Early Cambodia

    A New Date for the Phnom Da Images and Its Implications for Early Cambodia NANCY H. DOWLING SCHOLARS FAMILIAR WITH SOUTHEAST ASIAN ART HISTORY are well aware of a confusing chronology for early Cambodian sculpture. One reason for this situa­ tion is obvious. For nearly fifty years, Cambodian art history has been wed to the work of George Coedes. Praised as the dean of Southeast Asian history, he was a member of an elite group of French scholars who worked in Cambodia for decades before World War II. In 1944, he wrote Histoire ancienne des hats hindouses d'Extreme-Orient, in which he established a chronological framework for early Southeast Asian history based on an interplay of Chinese texts and indigenous inscriptions. Most Southeast Asian historians readily admit that "his book remains the basic source for early South East Asian history, and while much recent re­ search, based upon new inscriptional evidence or re-readings, modifies some of Coedes' specific conclusions, the structure remains his" (Brown 1996: 3). Such a singular dependency on Coedes had a stifling effect on Cambodian art history. When Jean Boisselier, carrying on the work of Philippe Stern and Gilberte de Coral-Remusat, made a comprehensive attempt to set in order Cambodian sculpture, the French art historian fitted the works of art into Coedes' ready­ made chronology. Unfortunately, this all happened as if it were preferable to adjust Cambodian sculpture to a preconceived notion of history rather than ques­ tioning the model. In this way, some basic mistakes have been made, and these seriously affect the chronology and interpretation of early Cambodian sculpture.
  • ASEAN Intervention in Cambodia: from Cold War to Conditionality Jones, L

    ASEAN Intervention in Cambodia: from Cold War to Conditionality Jones, L

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen Mary Research Online ASEAN intervention in Cambodia: from Cold War to conditionality Jones, L (c) 2007 Taylor & Francis For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/9434 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] ASEAN Intervention in Cambodia: From Cold War to Conditionality Lee Jones Abstract Despite their other theoretical differences, virtually all scholars of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) agree that the organisation’s members share an almost religious commitment to the norm of non-intervention. This article disrupts this consensus, arguing that ASEAN repeatedly intervened in Cambodia’s internal political conflicts from 1979-1999, often with powerful and destructive effects. ASEAN’s role in maintaining Khmer Rouge occupancy of Cambodia’s UN seat, constructing a new coalition government-in-exile, manipulating Khmer refugee camps and informing the content of the Cambodian peace process will be explored, before turning to the ‘creeping conditionality’ for ASEAN membership imposed after the 1997 ‘coup’ in Phnom Penh. The article argues for an analysis recognising the political nature of intervention, and seeks to explain both the creation of non- intervention norms, and specific violations of them, as attempts by ASEAN elites to maintain their own illiberal, capitalist regimes against domestic and international political threats. Keywords ASEAN, Cambodia, Intervention, Norms, Non-Interference, Sovereignty Contact Information Lee Jones is a doctoral candidate in International Relations at Nuffield College, Oxford, OX1 1NF, UK.