DOCSLIB.ORG

THE HOXHAIST COMMUNITY PRESENTS Notes on Maoite Revisionism, Towards an Ultimate Debunking of Maoism and It’S Social-Fascist Adherents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE HOXHAIST COMMUNITY PRESENTS Notes on Maoite Revisionism, Towards an Ultimate Debunking of Maoism and It’S Social-Fascist Adherents 1 THE HOXHAIST COMMUNITY PRESENTS Notes On Maoite Revisionism, Towards An Ultimate Debunking of Maoism And It’s Social-Fascist Adherents Study Packet For Comrades and for Maoites Looking For A Principled Confutation of Maoism This long overdue and highly important writing and re-examination into the effects of revisionism in China and its impact today could not have been possible devoid of the massive help of fellow Hoxhaist comrades who contributed to their utmost ability and their time and efforts into making this possible, particular, there’s a massive necessity of giving thanks to our dearest comrade, the Hoxhaist Warrior, who wrote an entire section here based on the far-reaching research they themselves have done on contemporary revolutionary movements, specifically Maoite ones, and we once again are very much appreciative of his work. Part One: Chinese Revisionism: A Result Of None Other Than Mao By The Raging Stalinist The Rise of Mao in The Communist Party Mao Zedong was born, and on December 26, 1893 to a well-off peasant family. It has been said that his ancestors had lived in the region for around 500 years. So this was a place familiar to Mao. It was a beautiful place, full of luscious trees, forests, hills, and mountains. Mao was the third son to his mother and father, but only the first one to actually be healthful enough to survive beyond his youth.[1] Mao disliked his father a lot[2], but being the kind of person he was, he consistently asked ​ ​ ​ ​ him for money, time and time again[3]. He eventually left his parents, and began to study the works ​ ​ of Confucius, renown for being a sham-philosopher who kept China down in the feudal ages, and so, this was only the beginning of his influences from reactionary, Confucian values. Mao could best be defined, in his teens, as a ‘Christian anarchist’, influenced by arch-revisionist and anarchist anti-communist, Peter Kropotkin[4]. It is unknown to us when exactly he went from being ​ ​ an an anarchist to being a capitalist, but the transition surely happened. Mao once had the chance to travel to France, where many revolutionaries were popping up, and activism was in full-force, but Mao rejected this, for typical bourgeois-chauvinist reasons. He wanted to continue worshipping Chinese history, no matter how evil it was. He instead decided to become a librarian, to keep all the capitalist and proto-revisionist books in check, and Mao was also a womanizer. He began to try and get with every woman in sight, marrying by 1920[5]. He also very much supported the United States ​ ​ at this time, as he would continue to do until the end. He became involved in some form of activism, that is, rallying up police — defenders of the BOURGEOIS-STATE APPARATUS, for unionization, or ​ ​ something along those lines. Also, around this time, he also had a business, and he employed many, many people. That’s the very function of capitalism: the bourgeoisie garner workers, who can’t live without them, and force them to work, then, the bourgeoisie takes their products for themselves and makes profit off of it, and forces the workers to work long hours, to produce more and more, giving them little pay. Mao was doing this, because Mao was a capitalist.[6] ​ 2 The Communist Party of China was founded in Shanghai in 1921, just ten years after the Revolution of 1911, which saw the overthrow of the last dynasty in China (or, so was thought, until the rise of Mao). The Party was initially founded as a study-group around the doctrine of Marx but came to be much, much more. The Soviet Union looked at the Party with great hope, but clearly began to see as time went on, and with the popularity of Mao’s line (in part due to force), the hope the Soviets once had began to fade. Mao Zedong ended up joining the Communist Party of China, out of a sheer lust for power, around 1927, where he also began to lead a counter-revolutionary ‘peasant’ insurrection in Hunan. Stalin looked over this with regret, because he wanted the Chinese to hoist an alliance with the revolutionary Kuomintang Party, but Mao was having none of it. Mao wanted all the power, all of China, for his own. The masses, and the Communist Party, went along with it, but unbeknownst to the Chinese communists, the real ones that is, was that he, Mao, was simply another prophet of capital. This would later be found out once he began to purge all the real communists and put himself up on a pedestal, fighting for the continuation of capitalist development. Mao Zedong, ever since the start, consistently schemed against Marxism-Leninism and the advance of world proletarian revolution, as we will get into. Mao, contrary to popular belief, was indeed also a racist. He was a Han supremacist, even though China is home to over 50-some ethnicities and nationalities. The Han are an ethnic group in China. Mao’s Han supremacist can be substantiated in his work, 'To The Glory of The Hans', where he said, ​ ​ and we quote,: "We are awakened! The world is ours, the nation is ours, society is ours." This signified the start of the new ethnic order, where the Han will become the dominant force in China. Other races, like that of the Mongolians, who were on the Soviets side, and the Tibetans, were to be repressed, and their birth rates soon thereafter declined en masse. ​ ​ Since the death of Mao, which we will get to shortly, the racialism of the past as only intensified, with the Han being represented as the greatest race, with intense ethno-nationalism, beyond that of even Mao's, rising, and with the continuation of the occupation of Tibet and the destruction of the Tibetan people. The revolution, however, continued. Even though Mao was, as evident from the start, a racist, the people will united with him, because of his (what-will-be) empty promises for a new, better world. Stalin clearly stated that Mao not go to far in his so-called revolution, because Stalin sensed his revisionist line from thousands-of-miles away. Mao disobeyed Stalin anyway, because of course Mao would disobey the greatest Marxist-Leninist, besides that of Hoxha, because of course, Mao was not a Marxist-Leninist. Afterall, Mao said “[...] we must not follow the example of the Soviet ​ Union”, meaning he did not want to follow on the socialist road, but instead, create a capitalism of his ​ own. 3 Mao died in 1976. His death was met with sympathizes from the likes of fascist-butcher Pinochet, and so on. But the specific point we want to make is that his death was no loss to the international community. However, what it did provide us with was an important lesson: don't be a revisionist! Mao's Thought, as Hoxha said, has nothing in common with Marxism-Leninism. Because of Mao's stupidity, China, which was supposedly liberated from the enslavement of the imperialists, (it was ​ never enslaved by any imperialist or reactionary power to begin with, but that’s besides the point...) was not at all ​ emancipated, but rather, put into the hands of a vile imperialist clique, that of the United States, and it went on to fight against socialism on all turfs, trying to go to war with Albania also. We will go furthermore into the question of the path China went down subsequent to 1949 in the next section. Down below is an outline, or rather, simplification, of the points made here. ● Mao Zedong was born into a bourgeois-household and he kept to the bourgeois nature of that household, he was a capitalist from the start and continued being a capitalist until the end. ● Mao Zedong did not join the Communist Party of China to spread socialism, or god-forbid, in his view, communism, but instead to accumulate as much power as possible for himself, and in doing so, he began to liquidate the genuine communist line of the party and suppress its backers; anyone who resisted his anti-communist line was ousted. ● Mao Zedong won in this struggle by using a cult of personality, exploiting the old confucian and feudal values of the people for his own gain, and by having the people worship him, those who resisted him, even the most minor of complaints, were vilified and shot down. This, effectively, led rise to not only revisionism but an increasing number of dead comrades who took up arms, in both words and in action, against Mao and his revisionism. ● Mao’s death was not a bad thing for the international communist camp, because he was a revisionist, and the ‘revolution’ he led did not overthrow former state powers, and he especially did not build socialism, but rather, put the power into the hands of the bourgeoisie, with him at the head, so it was just a capitalist revolt, if even that. Mao’s Grip On Power, and Bourgeois-Democratic Continuation Mao famously said, in a nefarious and hedonist manner, "We are prepared to sacrifice 300 million ​ Chinese for the victory of the world revolution,"[7] in 1957. A Marxist-Leninist would never treat the ​ ​ people as though they’re simple toys, ready to break at any time. A Marxist-Leninist, like Stalin, would stand by the people through whatever struggle there is, he would not sacrifice all of them in the name of a fascist uprising, that of which Mao pushed for.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whither Communism: a Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba Jon L
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2009 Whither Communism: A Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba Jon L. Mills University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Daniel Ryan Koslosky Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Jon Mills & Daniel Ryan Koslosky, Whither Communism: A Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba, 40 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1219 (2009), available at, http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/522 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHITHER COMMUNISM: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON CONSTITUTIONALISM IN A POSTSOCIALIST CUBA JON MILLS* AND DANIEL RYAN KOSLOSIc4 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1220 II. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ............................ 1222 A. Cuban ConstitutionalLaw .......................... 1223 1. Precommunist Legacy ........................ 1223 2. Communist Constitutionalism ................ 1225 B. Comparisons with Eastern Europe ................... 1229 1. Nationalizations in Eastern Europe ........... 1230 2. Cuban Expropriations ........................ 1231 III. MODES OF CONSTITUTIONALISM: A SCENARIO ANALYSIS. 1234 A. Latvia and the Problem of ConstitutionalInheritance . 1236 1. History, Revolution, and Reform ............. 1236 2. Resurrecting an Ancien Rgime ................ 1239 B. Czechoslovakia and Poland: Revolutions from Below .. 1241 1. Poland's Solidarity ........................... 1241 2. Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution ........... 1244 3. New Constitutionalism ....................... 1248 C. Hungary's GradualDecline and Decay ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Theses of the Communist Organization CONTENT
    Programmatic Theses of the Communist Organization CONTENT 3 The Flame of Communism Burns On! 4 Our Worldview 5 Class society 7 The State 8 Imperialism 10 Fascism and anti-fascism 12 Proletarian internationalism 14 Proletarian women’s movement 15 The communist party 17 Socialism and Communism 20 The revolutionary strategy 22 Revolutionary Practice 24 The Fight against Opportunism and Revisionism 28 Closing Words 2 The Flame of Communism Burns On! It has been a full century since the October Revolution ushered in the first suc- cessful socialist revolution and changed the world, costing imperialism its first great defeat. Under Lenin‘s leadership in 1917, the actions of the Bolsheviks beca- The Flame of Communism Burns On! me a spark that spread like wildfire, heralding in a new epoch of revolution. Our Worldview The victory of the counter-revolution of 1989/90, the destruction of socialism, and the worldwide solidification of capitalism cost the workers movement and Class society communism greatly. Communist parties, once proud and influential - anchored in the masses and accepted as their revolutionary leadership – disappeared into The State the shadows of history. Our organizations were demolished, they lost their mass influence, they assimilated into the system under the influence of revisionism or Imperialism dissolved. A revolutionary spark as powerful as that of the October Revolution seems far from reach today. Fascism and anti-fascism Still we say: the flame of communism burns on! The ruling status quo is today Proletarian internationalism just as unbearable as it was then. Capitalism produces unimaginable wealth for the few and poverty, misery, and hardship for the many.
    [Show full text]
  • June 20, 1966 Report on a Meeting Between Enver Hoxha and DPRK Ambassador an Yong
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 20, 1966 Report on a Meeting between Enver Hoxha and DPRK Ambassador An Yong Citation: “Report on a Meeting between Enver Hoxha and DPRK Ambassador An Yong,” June 20, 1966, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, AQPPSH, MPP Korese, D 3, V. 1966. Translated for NKIDP by Enkel Daljani. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114407 Summary: Enver Hoxha meets with the North Korean Ambassador to Albania, An Yong, to discuss North Korea's foreign relations, Titoist and Khrushchevian revisionism, the communist movement, and bilateral relations. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Albanian Contents: English Translation THE MEETING BETWEEN THE FIRST SECRETARY OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE ALBANIAN LABOR PARTY, COMRADE ENVER HOXHA, AND THE AMBASSADOR OF THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA, AN YONG, ON THE OCCASION OF HIS FINAL DEPARTURE FROM ALBANIA, ON JUNE 20, 1966 After Comrade Enver Hoxha received the ambassador and went to the quarters where the conversation would take place, he asked him about the health of Comrade [General Secretary of the Korean Worker’s Party (KWP)] Kim Il Sung and also expressed his regret that after a stay of several years, the ambassador is leaving Albania. “But you are Albanians now,” said Comrade Enver Hoxha to the North Korean ambassador. Ambassador An Yong: Since the time I set off for Albania, where I have stayed for a relatively long time, I had a recommendation from the party and government to do all that is possible to accomplish my task within the framework of our great friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Maoism Versus Opportunism in Turkey
    Maoism Versus Opportunism in Turkey The article below is excerpted from a letter written by the Committee of the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (CoRIM) to the Communist Party of Turkey/Marxist-Leninist (TKP/ML) in mid-2001. The TKP/ML is one of several political centres that emerged from the formerly united Communist Party of Turkey Marxist-Leninist (TKPML), which was a founding participant of the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement in 1984. During the course of a series of splits and realignments among Party forces, several centres of the TKPML have emerged, each of which continues to use the name of the Party and claim its heritage. The names of the two largest groupings that exist today are distinguished only by punctuation marks: the TKP(ML) and the TKP/ML. In the RIM Committee letter, reference is made to other centres that have existed in the course of the Party’s history, in particular the TKP/ML (Maoist Party Centre), which continues today, and the TKP/ML East Anatolia Regional Committee, usually referred to by its Turkish initials DABK, which merged with the TKP/ML Central Committee to form the TKP/ML Provisional United Central Committee in 1994 and which subsequently split into the above-mentioned TKP/ML, which publishes Ozgur Gelecek, and TKP(ML). To minimise confusion concerning the names of the different Party centres, no punctuation is used when referring to the previously united TKPML of 1984 and earlier, and the other centres are referred to by the punctuation they use themselves. As the letter makes clear, from the formation of RIM onwards serious differences emerged between the TKPML and RIM, and a long process of discussion and struggle has gone on involving the different centres that emerged from the previously united TKPML.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Argentine Problem' : an Analysis of Political Instability in a Modern Society
    THE 'ARGENTINE PROBLEM7: AN ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INSTABILITY IN A MODERN SOCIETY Alphonse Victor Mallette B.A., University of Lethbridge, 1980 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS @ Alphonse Victor Mallette 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY June, 1986 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, proJect or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for flnanclal gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay Author: -. - rJ (date) -.-.--ABSTRACT This thesis is designed to explain, through political and historical analysis, a phenomenon identified by scholars of pol- itical development as the "Argentine Problem". Argentina is seen as a paradox, a nation which does not display the political stab- ility commensurate with its level of socio-economic development. The work also seeks to examine the origins and policies of the most serious manifestation of dictatorial rule in the nation's history, the period of military power from 1976 to 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • 180203 the Argentine Military and the Antisubversivo Genocide
    Journal: GSI; Volume 11; Issue: 2 DOI: 10.3138/gsi.11.2.03 The Argentine Military and the “Antisubversivo” Genocide DerGhougassian and Brumat The Argentine Military and the “Antisubversivo ” Genocide: The School of Americas’ Contribution to the French Counterinsurgency Model Khatchik DerGhougassian UNLa, Argentina Leiza Brumat EUI, Italy Abstract: The article analyzes role of the United States during the 1976–1983 military dictatorship and their genocidal counterinsurgency war in Argentina. We argue that Washington’s policy evolved from the initial loose support of the Ford administration to what we call “the Carter exception” in 1977—79 when the violation of Human Rights were denounced and concrete measures taken to put pressure on the military to end their repressive campaign. Human Rights, however, lost their importance on Washington’s foreign policy agenda with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and the end of the Détente. The Argentine military briefly recuperated US support with Ronald Reagan in 1981 to soon lose it with the Malvinas War. Argentina’s defeat turned the page of the US support to military dictatorships in Latin America and marked the debut of “democracy promotion.” Keywords: Proceso, dirty war, human rights, Argentine military, French School, the School of the Americas, Carter Page 1 of 48 Journal: GSI; Volume 11; Issue: 2 DOI: 10.3138/gsi.11.2.03 Introduction: Framing the US. Role during the Proceso When an Argentine military junta seized the power on March 24, 1976 and implemented its “ plan antisubversivo ,” a supposedly counterinsurgency plan to end the political violence in the country, Henry Kissinger, the then United States’ Secretary of State of the Gerald Ford Administration, warned his Argentine colleague that the critiques for the violation of human rights would increment and it was convenient to end the “operations” before January of 1977 when Jimmy Carter, the Democratic candidate and winner of the presidential elections, would assume the power in the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Titoism in by the Organizaci6n Irotskista Revolucionaria (OIR) of Chile Trouble
    NUIBER 32 JUNE 1976 TlENTYCEm A CTU leaders refuse to fight e a es, e I an un eraHac Treasurer Phil Lynch's 20 May "mini-budget", direct taxes on consumer staples. The aspiring the federal government's latest move in its pro­ heir to the leadership of the parliamentary ALP, gram of austerity, slashed an estimated $2600 Bob Hawke, proclaimed the Lynch package "good in million from proposed government spending and parts and bad in parts", and pontificated on the brought into focus the key elements of Fraser's "tragedy" of the Liberals' original opposition to anti-labour strategy. Programs for urban and Labor's own earlier attempt to impose a levy to regional development, health, aborigines and pay for Medibank (Sydney MOPning Herald, 21 May). transport were sharply reduced, with further cuts Hawke's stand was "moderate and encouraging", the promised in the budget proper in August. A right-wing Fairfax press editorialised approv­ major blow to the working class was the 2.5 per­ ingly (Sydney MOPning Herald, 22 May). cent levy on everyone choosing to remain within It was these reformist stooges of the bosses Medibank and the elimination of Medibank as a who laid the foundations for Fraser's attack on universal health scheme. Despite its severe in­ Medibank by watering it down to make it accept­ adequacies Medibank was one of Labor's few at­ able to capitalism. Despite their best efforts tempts at real reform, a timid step in the di­ in this regard, the bosses have succeeded in mor­ rection of what should be a basic right for all tally wounding it less than a year after its in~ working people -- universal free quality health troduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BINDEX 06/25/2018 18:16:29 Page 379 INDEX ‘Ndrangheta, 261 Ambedkar, B. R., 115, 150, 238, 273, 1848 revolutions, 306 282, 311 1955 System, 137 American Civil War, 94 9/11, 178, 269, 273, 301, 302 American Constitution, 109, 318 Amin al-Husseini, Haj, 100 Aam Aadmi Party, 311 Amin, Idi, 127, 255 Abdullah of Jordan, King, 120 Amritsar Massacre (1919), 30, 48 Abe, Shinzo, 317 anarchism, 5, 10, 44, 61, 159, 219, 306 Aborigines, 38, 74, 265, 272, 275 Andaman Islands, 267 Abyssinia, 97, 250, 265 Anglo-Boer War, 16, 31, 39 Action Française, 59, 67, 81, 109, 225 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty (1936), 55 Adenauer, Konrad, 109, 132, 244 Anglo-Hindu law, 278 Advani, L. K., 171 Anglo-Iraq treaties; (1926), (1932) African National Congress, 142, 155, Anglo-Muhammadan law, 278 156, 176, 281, 312 Anglo-Russian Entente (1907), 22 Afrikaners, 31, 73, 127, 155, 279 animals in war, 210, 295 agricultural reforms, 54, 63, 75, 84, 85, Antarctica, 15 94, 119, 124, 127, 129, 134, 135, 146, Anthropocene, 214, 287, 295, 296 151, 153, 185, 232, 284, 291, 297, 307, Anthropology, 8, 179, 183, 186–189, 309, 316 192, 232, 234, 296 Ahmadiyya, 168, 234 anti-fascist resistance, 133 AIDS, 204, 205, 288, 289, 312, 323 Anti-French War, 123 Alawites, 22, 280 anti-hunting protests, 210, 295 Alexander I of Yugoslavia, King, 62 anti-Nazi resistance, 65 Alger Hiss case, 110 anti-Semitism, 16, 60, 66, 81, 100, 103, Algerian War of Independence,COPYRIGHTED 185 197, 243, 251,MATERIAL 256, 299, 308 Algérie Française, 156 Anti-US War, 123 Ali, Mehmet, 239, 240 anti-Vietnam War protests, 143, 200 Ali, Muhammad, 210 Antonius, George, 22, 28 Aligarh Muslim University, 207 Apartheid, 90, 127, 135, 156, 163, 174, Allahabad, 111, 276 176, 210, 255, 268, 279, 285, 296, 311, Allende, Salvador, 159 312 Allied Powers (First World War), 13, 96 Appadurai, Arjun, 6, 299 Remaking the Modern World 1900–2015: Global Connections and Comparisons, First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical and Comparative Analysis of Organisational Forms of Selected Marxist Parties, in Theory and in Practice, with Special Reference to the Last Half Century
    Rahimi, M. (2009) A critical and comparative analysis of organisational forms of selected Marxist parties, in theory and in practice, with special reference to the last half century. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/688/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] A critical and comparative analysis of organisational forms of selected Marxist parties, in theory and in practice, with special reference to the last half century Mohammad Rahimi, BA, MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Centre for the Study of Socialist Theory and Movement Faculty of Law, Business and Social Science University of Glasgow September 2008 The diversity of the proletariat during the final two decades of the 20 th century reached a point where traditional socialist and communist parties could not represent all sections of the working class. Moreover, the development of social movements other than the working class after the 1960s further sidelined traditional parties. The anti-capitalist movements in the 1970s and 1980s were looking for new political formations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae of MELVYN C. GOLDSTEIN (Revised 4-6-2020)
    Curriculum Vitae Of MELVYN C. GOLDSTEIN (Revised 4-6-2020) Personal Background Education B.A., 1959, University of Michigan, history M.A., 1960, University of Michigan, history Ph.D. 1968, University of WAshington, anthropology Employment 1991-present: John Reynolds HArkness Professor of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University 1991-present: Professor of International HeAlth, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University (secondary appointment) 1991-present: Co-Director, Center for ReseArch on Tibet, Case Western Reserve University 1987-1991: Director, Center for ReseArch on Tibet, Case Western Reserve University 1975-2002: ChairmAn of Department of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University 1978-present: Professor of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University 1974-1978: AssociAte Professor of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University 1968-1971: AssistAnt Professor of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University 1 -- Professional Activities and Honors Distinguished University Professor, Case Western Reserve University, 2020. Elected Member, National Academy of Sciences, Section 51, Anthropology, 2009- present. Distinguished Research Award, Case Western Reserve University, 2016 The AssociAtion for AsiAn Studies’ Joseph Levenson Prize for best monograph on Twentieth-Century China in 1989: Honorable Mention: ("A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-51: The Demise of the LAmAist StAte"). This monumental study is a path-breaking contribution to our understanding of modern Tibet. Melvyn Goldstein has marshalled an impressive array of documentary, archival and interview sources to provide critical new insights into the political and diplomatic history of Tibet during its independence of Chinese domination. Particularly important is the author’s use of Tibetan sources to go beyond the question of Tibet’s relation to China, and narrate in detail the conflicts within Tibetan society: between monastic and lay elements, between reformers and conservatives, between rival regents’ cliques.
    [Show full text]
  • British Newspaper Coverage of the Tibet Issue Over Time, 1949
    British Newspaper Coverage of the Tibet Issue over Time, 1949-2009: Representations of Repression and Resistance by Chunyan Wu A Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University June 2018 © by Chunyan Wu 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My deepest gratitude goes to my supervisor, Professor James Stanyer, who has given me the most precious intellectual inspirations, valuable advice and help on this long road. Without his generous supports, encouragements, discussions and comments, this dissertation may never appear. I appreciate the help and support from the whole faculty of Social Sciences Department at Loughborough University, especially the administrator Deirdre Lombard who is always willing to help under all conditions. I am also very grateful for the support from all my personal friends at Loughborough, including Lingqi Kong, Mingxi Yin, Hui-Ju Tsai, Xue Li, Zhijia Yang, Edward Winward, Miaoshan Pan, Jiacheng Zhen, Fabia Lin and Harry Gui. In the process of this research, they not only kept with me very insightful academic communications but also shared with me their warmest friendship which helped me move on in the darkest moments. My PhD life at Loughborough would be very dull and colorless without them around. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my parents for their selfless love, understanding, and endless support for me for my entire life, without which I could impossibly achieve what I have accomplished today. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Hu Jintao: the Making of a Chinese General Secretary Richard Daniel
    Hu Jintao: The Making of a Chinese General Secretary Richard Daniel Ewing ABSTRACT Chinese Vice-President Hu Jintao, Jiang Zemin’s heir apparent, has risen to the elite levels of Chinese politics through skill and a diverse network of political patrons. Hu’s political career spans four decades, and he has been associated with China’s top leaders, including Song Ping, Hu Yaobang, Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin. Though marked early as a liberal by his ties to Hu Yaobang, Hu Jintao’s conservative credentials were fashioned during the imposition of martial law in Tibet in 1989. Those actions endeared him to the Beijing leadership following the 4 June Tiananmen Square crackdown, and his career accelerated in the 1990s. Young, cautious and talented, Hu catapulted to the Politburo Standing Committee, the vice-presidency and the Central Military Commission. Despite recent media attention, Hu’s positions on economic and foreign policy issues remain poorly defined. As the 16th Party Congress approaches, Hu is likely to be preparing to become General Secretary of the Communist Party and a force in world affairs. The late 1990s witnessed the extraordinary rise of Vice-President Hu Jintao from obscurity to pre-eminence as one of China’s most powerful politicians and President Jiang Zemin’s heir apparent. If Hu succeeds Jiang, he will lead China’s 1.3 billion people into a new era. Over the next decade, he would manage China’s emergence as a global power – a leading country with one of the world’s largest economies, nuclear weapons and a seat on the United Nations Security Council.
    [Show full text]