1 THE HOXHAIST COMMUNITY PRESENTS Notes On Maoite Revisionism, Towards An Ultimate Debunking of Maoism And It’s Social-Fascist Adherents Study Packet For Comrades and for Maoites Looking For A Principled Confutation of Maoism This long overdue and highly important writing and re-examination into the effects of revisionism in China and its impact today could not have been possible devoid of the massive help of fellow Hoxhaist comrades who contributed to their utmost ability and their time and efforts into making this possible, particular, there’s a massive necessity of giving thanks to our dearest comrade, the Hoxhaist Warrior, who wrote an entire section here based on the far-reaching research they themselves have done on contemporary revolutionary movements, specifically Maoite ones, and we once again are very much appreciative of his work. Part One: Chinese Revisionism: A Result Of None Other Than Mao By The Raging Stalinist The Rise of Mao in The Communist Party Mao Zedong was born, and on December 26, 1893 to a well-off peasant family. It has been said that his ancestors had lived in the region for around 500 years. So this was a place familiar to Mao. It was a beautiful place, full of luscious trees, forests, hills, and mountains. Mao was the third son to his mother and father, but only the first one to actually be healthful enough to survive beyond his youth.[1] Mao disliked his father a lot[2], but being the kind of person he was, he consistently asked ​ ​ ​ ​ him for money, time and time again[3]. He eventually left his parents, and began to study the works ​ ​ of Confucius, renown for being a sham-philosopher who kept China down in the feudal ages, and so, this was only the beginning of his influences from reactionary, Confucian values. Mao could best be defined, in his teens, as a ‘Christian anarchist’, influenced by arch-revisionist and anarchist anti-communist, Peter Kropotkin[4]. It is unknown to us when exactly he went from being ​ ​ an an anarchist to being a capitalist, but the transition surely happened. Mao once had the chance to travel to France, where many revolutionaries were popping up, and activism was in full-force, but Mao rejected this, for typical bourgeois-chauvinist reasons. He wanted to continue worshipping Chinese history, no matter how evil it was. He instead decided to become a librarian, to keep all the capitalist and proto-revisionist books in check, and Mao was also a womanizer. He began to try and get with every woman in sight, marrying by 1920[5]. He also very much supported the United States ​ ​ at this time, as he would continue to do until the end. He became involved in some form of activism, that is, rallying up police — defenders of the BOURGEOIS-STATE APPARATUS, for unionization, or ​ ​ something along those lines. Also, around this time, he also had a business, and he employed many, many people. That’s the very function of capitalism: the bourgeoisie garner workers, who can’t live without them, and force them to work, then, the bourgeoisie takes their products for themselves and makes profit off of it, and forces the workers to work long hours, to produce more and more, giving them little pay. Mao was doing this, because Mao was a capitalist.[6] ​ 2 The Communist Party of China was founded in Shanghai in 1921, just ten years after the Revolution of 1911, which saw the overthrow of the last dynasty in China (or, so was thought, until the rise of Mao). The Party was initially founded as a study-group around the doctrine of Marx but came to be much, much more. The Soviet Union looked at the Party with great hope, but clearly began to see as time went on, and with the popularity of Mao’s line (in part due to force), the hope the Soviets once had began to fade. Mao Zedong ended up joining the Communist Party of China, out of a sheer lust for power, around 1927, where he also began to lead a counter-revolutionary ‘peasant’ insurrection in Hunan. Stalin looked over this with regret, because he wanted the Chinese to hoist an alliance with the revolutionary Kuomintang Party, but Mao was having none of it. Mao wanted all the power, all of China, for his own. The masses, and the Communist Party, went along with it, but unbeknownst to the Chinese communists, the real ones that is, was that he, Mao, was simply another prophet of capital. This would later be found out once he began to purge all the real communists and put himself up on a pedestal, fighting for the continuation of capitalist development. Mao Zedong, ever since the start, consistently schemed against Marxism-Leninism and the advance of world proletarian revolution, as we will get into. Mao, contrary to popular belief, was indeed also a racist. He was a Han supremacist, even though China is home to over 50-some ethnicities and nationalities. The Han are an ethnic group in China. Mao’s Han supremacist can be substantiated in his work, 'To The Glory of The Hans', where he said, ​ ​ and we quote,: "We are awakened! The world is ours, the nation is ours, society is ours." This signified the start of the new ethnic order, where the Han will become the dominant force in China. Other races, like that of the Mongolians, who were on the Soviets side, and the Tibetans, were to be repressed, and their birth rates soon thereafter declined en masse. ​ ​ Since the death of Mao, which we will get to shortly, the racialism of the past as only intensified, with the Han being represented as the greatest race, with intense ethno-nationalism, beyond that of even Mao's, rising, and with the continuation of the occupation of Tibet and the destruction of the Tibetan people. The revolution, however, continued. Even though Mao was, as evident from the start, a racist, the people will united with him, because of his (what-will-be) empty promises for a new, better world. Stalin clearly stated that Mao not go to far in his so-called revolution, because Stalin sensed his revisionist line from thousands-of-miles away. Mao disobeyed Stalin anyway, because of course Mao would disobey the greatest Marxist-Leninist, besides that of Hoxha, because of course, Mao was not a Marxist-Leninist. Afterall, Mao said “[...] we must not follow the example of the Soviet ​ Union”, meaning he did not want to follow on the socialist road, but instead, create a capitalism of his ​ own. 3 Mao died in 1976. His death was met with sympathizes from the likes of fascist-butcher Pinochet, and so on. But the specific point we want to make is that his death was no loss to the international community. However, what it did provide us with was an important lesson: don't be a revisionist! Mao's Thought, as Hoxha said, has nothing in common with Marxism-Leninism. Because of Mao's stupidity, China, which was supposedly liberated from the enslavement of the imperialists, (it was ​ never enslaved by any imperialist or reactionary power to begin with, but that’s besides the point...) was not at all ​ emancipated, but rather, put into the hands of a vile imperialist clique, that of the United States, and it went on to fight against socialism on all turfs, trying to go to war with Albania also. We will go furthermore into the question of the path China went down subsequent to 1949 in the next section. Down below is an outline, or rather, simplification, of the points made here. ● Mao Zedong was born into a bourgeois-household and he kept to the bourgeois nature of that household, he was a capitalist from the start and continued being a capitalist until the end. ● Mao Zedong did not join the Communist Party of China to spread socialism, or god-forbid, in his view, communism, but instead to accumulate as much power as possible for himself, and in doing so, he began to liquidate the genuine communist line of the party and suppress its backers; anyone who resisted his anti-communist line was ousted. ● Mao Zedong won in this struggle by using a cult of personality, exploiting the old confucian and feudal values of the people for his own gain, and by having the people worship him, those who resisted him, even the most minor of complaints, were vilified and shot down. This, effectively, led rise to not only revisionism but an increasing number of dead comrades who took up arms, in both words and in action, against Mao and his revisionism. ● Mao’s death was not a bad thing for the international communist camp, because he was a revisionist, and the ‘revolution’ he led did not overthrow former state powers, and he especially did not build socialism, but rather, put the power into the hands of the bourgeoisie, with him at the head, so it was just a capitalist revolt, if even that. Mao’s Grip On Power, and Bourgeois-Democratic Continuation Mao famously said, in a nefarious and hedonist manner, "We are prepared to sacrifice 300 million ​ Chinese for the victory of the world revolution,"[7] in 1957. A Marxist-Leninist would never treat the ​ ​ people as though they’re simple toys, ready to break at any time. A Marxist-Leninist, like Stalin, would stand by the people through whatever struggle there is, he would not sacrifice all of them in the name of a fascist uprising, that of which Mao pushed for.