DOCSLIB.ORG

REVIEWS April D. Deconick, Recovering the Original Gospel Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REVIEWS April D. Deconick, Recovering the Original Gospel Of Vigiliae 844_BRecvs_231-241 5/5/06 1:50 PM Page 231 REVIEWS April D. DeConick, Recovering the Original Gospel of Thomas. A History of the Gospel and its Growth (Library of New Testament Studies 286), London- New York: T&T Clark 2005, XVII + 287 pp., ISBN 0-567-04342-8, $ 130. This study is a scholarly masterpiece and presents a wealth of unselfish learning. Applying modern theories on orality and social memory the authoress describes the growth of a kernel (“a speech Gospel”) into the present shape of the Gospel of Thomas. First, there was a short collection of Sayings attributed to Jesus. This originated in the primitive congregation of Jerusalem, of which James, the brother of the Lord, was the leader. It should be dated prior to 50 A.D. and was apocalyptic. This tradition has its counterpart in the Gospel quotations of the (Jewish-Christian) Pseudo- Clementine literature, the Diatessaron of the Syrian Encratite Tatian and the so-called Western Text of the New Testament. Having travelled north east to Syria along the missionary road, this same tradition was transferred to a Hellenistic milieu, amplified and adapted to a different civilisation: Apocalyptics became mysticism, eschatology became protology, the imminent Kingdom became the immanent Kingdom. All this is due to the non-event of the Second Coming. Ultimately, it is within the individual soul that God is to be sought and found. It would be false to call the Gospel of Thomas Gnostic. Rather, it is strongly ascetic and encratic, like the Acts of Thomas (ca. 220 Edessa) and the Syrian mystic from Edessa Makarios (4th century). This impressive theory is built on a subway of footnotes indicating almost all relevant secondary literature (Erik Peterson is missing). I agree with most of the views presented in this book for the following reasons. These sayings never call the Pharisees hypocrites, whereas corre- sponding passages in the synoptic Gospels relate that Jesus did so. This has an authentic ring, because, as Christopher Tucket observed (in the Proceedings of the Irish Biblical Association 26, 2003, 39), the use of the Greek noun ÍpokritÆw has always been regarded as unlikely to go back to Jesus, © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2006 Vigiliae Christianae 60, 231-233 Also available online – www.brill.nl Vigiliae 844_BRecvs_231-241 5/5/06 1:50 PM Page 232 232 reviews because there is no obvious Aramaic equivalent to the word with the mean- ing required. Moreover, I cannot believe that this tradition grew spontaneously and anonymously, like a beautiful flower. The numerous doublets in the Gospel of Thomas presuppose two written sources. What is true for Matthew and Luke (Mark and Q), must also be true for Thomas. It must be dependent upon two written documents, a Judaic one and a Hellenistic one. The author of the later writing must have been a deep thinker and a theological mastermind. He may be compared with the author of the Fourth Gospel, who works out a Judaic theology of the Name as the essential revelation of an unseen God, to expound his message that Christ is the unique and exclusive way to the Father. Let me clarify my views. Logos 41 runs as follows: “Jesus said: ‘Whoever has in his hand, to him shall be given; and whoever does not have, from him shall be taken even the little which he has’.” The expression “in his hand” is unusual. It is not to be found in the parallel versions of the eccle- siastical Gospels nor anywhere else in this context (M. 4:25 = Mt. 13:12 and L. 8:18; Mt. 25:29 and L. 8:18 = Q). And yet it has a familiar ring. “In his hand,” Hebrew: bejado, occurs many times in the First Testament. Most relevant to this Saying is the story of Saul in search of his mules (1 Samuel 9:8). There the servant says to the future king that he has the fourth part of a silver shekel in his hand to give to the man of God. When you consult a prophet, it is always necessary to offer a present. This parallel shows what this Saying of Jesus really means: it is always necessary to give alms to the needy, then God will give you even more; but if you are not willing to assist the poor, then God will take from you even the small capital which you possess. This is very much in tune with the spirit of Jesus, who blessed the poor. The other half of the doublet is transmitted by Logos 70: “If you give birth to that which is within yourselves, then will that (which you have within yourselves) save you; if you do not have that within yourselves, will that, which you do not have within you, kill you.” This is very Hellenic and Hellenistic, exactly that which you would expect in a metropolis like Alexandria ad Aegyptum. The poet Pindar says: “Be what you are by becoming conscious of yourself.” In the dialogue Meno, the Platonic Socrates elicits the whole knowledge of mathematics from the soul of an ignorant young slave. Even present day psychologists warn us that it is extremely dangerous to repress your natural inclinations: that may kill you. That is not the product of anonymous growth: it is the formulation of an insight of a wise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes Introductory to the Study of The
    I B. H. Til NOTES INTRODUCTORY TO THE STUDY OF THE CLEMENTINE RECOGNITIONS NOTES INTRODUCTORY TO THE STUDY OF THE CLEMENTLNE RECOGNITIONS A COURSE OF LECTURES BY FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT D.D. SOMETIME HULSEAN PROFESSOR AND LADY MARGARET S READER IN DIVINITY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE HLon&on MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1901 All rights reserved PRINTED BY J. AND C. F. CLAY AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS NOTE. book contains the notes made by Dr Hort THISfor a course of Lectures which he delivered in Cambridge as Hulsean Professor in the October Term, 1884. They were written out almost in full, and are printed substantially as they stand. It is clear from the Preface, which was found in the same box with the Lecture Notes, that Dr Hort had intended to publish them. They form a natural supplement to the volume of Lectures on Judaistic Christianity printed in 1894. The subject was one which clearly had a strong attraction for him as one of the earliest attempts to grapple seriously with some of the most indestruct ible problems of life and thought, from a point of view substantially, however imperfectly, Christian. His copies both of the Recognitions and of the Homilies bear the marks of careful and repeated study, the fruits of which are only indirectly repre sented in these Notes. Among other things he had compiled a full Index Verborum for the Recog nitions/ which it has not seemed worth while to vi NOTE print in this volume, but which will gladly be put at the service of any editor of the text of the Recognitions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disputes Between Appion and Clement in the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies: a Narrative and Rhetorical Approach to the Structure of Hom
    The Disputes between Appion and Clement in the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies: A Narrative and Rhetorical Approach to the Structure of Hom. 6 BENJAMIN DE VOS Ghent University Introduction This contribution offers, in the first place (1), a structural and rhetorical reading of the debates on the third day between Clement and Appion in the Pseudo-Clem- entine Homilies (Hom. 6) and shows that there is a well-considered rhetorical ring structure in their disputes. Connected with this first point (2), the suggested read- ing will unravel how Clement and Appion use and manipulate their sophisticated rhetoric, linked to this particular structure. This is well worth considering since these debates deal with Greek paideia, which means culture and above all educa- tion, of which rhetorical education forms part. The rhetorical features will be dis- played as a fine product of the rhetorical and even sophistic background in Late Antiquity. Clement, moreover, will present himself as a master in rhetoric against Appion, who is presented as a sophist and a grammarian in the Pseudo-Clemen- tine Homilies. Until now, the Pseudo-Clementine research context concerning Hom. 6 has focused on two aspects. First, several researchers have examined to which tradition of Orphic Cosmogonies the Homilistic version, included in the speech of Appion, belongs. Secondly, according to some scholars, the disputes between Appion and Clement have an abrupt ending. However, they have not looked at the structure and function of the general debate between Clement and Appion and of the whole work. Finally (3), the reappraisal of the rhetorical dy- namics in and the narrative structure of Hom.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Texts and Traditions
    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey (Zürich) Mitherausgeber / Associate Editors Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) · James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala) Hans-Josef Klauck (Chicago, IL) · Tobias Nicklas (Regensburg) J. Ross Wagner (Durham, NC) 349 Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Texts and Traditions Edited by Pierluigi Piovanelli and Tony Burke With the collaboration of Timothy Pettipiece Mohr Siebeck Pierluigi Piovanelli, born 1961; 1987 MA; 1992 PhD; Professor of Second Temple Judaism and Early Christianity at the University of Ottawa (Ontario, Canada). Tony Burke, born 1968; 1995 MA; 2001 PhD; Associate Professor of Early Christianity at York University (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). ISBN 978-3-16-151994-9 / eISBN 978-3-16-157495-5 unveränderte eBook-Ausgabe 2019 ISSN 0512-1604 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum NeuenT estament) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohr.de This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproduc- tions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer inT übingen using Minion Pro typeface, printed by Gulde-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Spinner in Otters- weier. Printed in Germany. This volume is dedicated to the memories of Pierre Geoltrain (1929–2004) and François Bovon (1938–2013), without whom nothing of this would have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Christian Identity: the False Scripture Argument in Early Christian Literature Kevin M
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Shaping Christian Identity: The False Scripture Argument in Early Christian Literature Kevin M. (Kevin Michael) Vaccarella Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES SHAPING CHRISTIAN IDENTITY: THE FALSE SCRIPTURE ARGUMENT IN EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE By Kevin M. Vaccarella A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Religion in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded Summer semester, 2007 Copyright © 2007 Kevin M. Vaccarella All Rights Reserved The members of the committee approve the dissertation by Kevin M. Vaccarella defended on June 7, 2007. ___________________________ Nicole Kelley Professor Directing Dissertation ___________________________ John Marincola Outside Committee Member ___________________________ David Levenson Committee Member Approved: ______________________________________ John Corrigan, Chair, Department of Religion ________________________________________________ Joseph Travis, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and confirmed the above named committee members. ii For Jenness iii ACKNOWLEGMENTS My dissertation began with an exploration of texts and a setting with which I was not very familiar. My eventual proficiency with the subject matter was due to a combination of my growing interest in the material and the patient guidance of my dissertation director, Nicole Kelley. It was she who first suggested I investigate the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies. Dr. Kelley’s enthusiastic direction through the Pseudo-Clementines has always been coupled with the freedom to explore comparisons with other writings – a freedom that eventually led me to the Didascalia Apostolorum and Ptolemy's Letter to Flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Discerning Witnesses: First and Second Century Textual Studies in Christian Authority
    DISCERNING WITNESSES: FIRST AND SECOND CENTURY TEXTUAL STUDIES IN CHRISTIAN AUTHORITY BY JACOB JOSEPH PRAHLOW A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Religion May 2014 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Bill J. Leonard, Ph.D., Advisor Mary F. Foskett, Ph.D., Chair Stephen B. Boyd, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number of people whom I would like to thank for their assistance in crafting this thesis. Foremost, I offer my sincere gratitude to Dr. Bill Leonard for his continuous support, longsuffering patience, clarifying questions, and immense knowledge. Without his guidance, the completion of this project would not have been possible. Second, I would also like to offer profound thanks to the other members of my thesis committee, Dr. Mary Foskett and Dr. Stephen Boyd, for their encouragement, insightful comments, and hard questions. Third, I need to thank my wife Hayley for her enduring encouragement, many uninterrupted study hours, and the willingness to listen as I worked through concepts aloud. Many thanks also go out to Dr. Lisa Driver, Dr. Gilbert Meilaender, Dr. Ronald Rittgers, Dr. Michael Baumen, Mr. Kevin Bywater, Mr. Timothy Smith, Dr. James Powell, and Dr. Jarrod Whitaker, as well as colleagues Mr. Daniel McCluskey and Mr. Ben Cabe, for their influence on my thinking about the history of Christianity and insights into the method behind this project. Additionally, I would like to thank those who have helped me review and edit parts of this thesis, Jody Byrkett and Laura Ehlen.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbelo 1 Barbelo
    Barbelo 1 Barbelo Part of a series on Gnosticism History • Early • Syrian-Egyptic • Mandaeism • Manichaeism • Sabians of Haran • Modern schools Proto-Gnostics • Philo • Simon Magus • Cerinthus • Valentinus • Basilides • Menander Scriptures • Gnostic Gospels • Nag Hammadi library • Pseudo-Abdias • Clementine literature • Gnosticism and the New Testament Codices • Codex Tchacos • Askew Codex • Bruce Codex • Berlin Codex Lists • Gnostic sects • Gnostic terms Related articles • Gnosis • Jnana • Esoteric Christianity • Theosophy • Neoplatonism and Gnosticism • v • t [1] • e Barbelo 2 The Gnostic term "Barbēlō" (Greek: Βαρβηλώ)[2] refers to the first emanation of God in several forms of Gnostic cosmogony. Barbēlō is often depicted as a supreme female principle, the single passive antecedent of creation in its manifoldness. This figure is also variously referred to as 'Mother-Father' (hinting at her apparent androgyny), 'First Human Being', 'The Triple Androgynous Name', or 'Eternal Aeon'. So prominent was her place amongst some Gnostics that some schools were designated as Barbeliotae, Barbēlō worshippers or Barbēlōgnostics. The nature of Barbēlō Nag Hammadi Library In the Apocryphon of John, a tractate in the Nag Hammadi Library containing the most extensive recounting of the Sethian creation myth, the Barbēlō is described as "the first power, the glory, Barbēlō, the perfect glory in the aeons, the glory of the revelation". All subsequent acts of creation within the divine sphere (save, crucially, that of the lowest aeon Sophia) occurs through her coaction with God. The text describes her thus: This is the first thought, his image; she became the womb of everything, for it is she who is prior to them all, the Mother-Father, the first man (Anthropos), the holy Spirit, the thrice-male, the thrice-powerful, the thrice-named androgynous one, and the eternal aeon among the invisible ones, and the first to come forth.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rome to Constantinople
    FROM ROME TO CONSTANTINOPLE Studies in Honour of Averil Cameron edited by Hagit Amirav & Bas ter Haar Romeny PEETERS LEUVEN - PARIS - DUDLEY, MA 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ix List of Contributors xiii To Make Byzantium Interesting: Our Debt to Averil Cameron 1 Peter BROWN A. HISTORIOGRAPHY AND RHETORIC Eusebius' Vita Constantini and the Construction of the Image of Maxentius 11 Jan Willem DRIJVERS The OriginaHty and Origins of Anonymus, De Divitiis 29 Peter GARNSEY Apocrypha and the Literary Past in Late Antiquity 47 Scott JOHNSON Strabo and Procopius: Classical Geography for a Christian Empire 67 Michael MAAS Ammianus Stoicus^. Reflections on Rulership, Tyranny, and Power in the Res Gestae 85 Hagit AMIRAV B. CHRISTIANITY IN ITS SOCIAL CONTEXTS Theodoret of Cyrrhus: a Syrian in Greek Dress? 105 Fergus MILLAR Persecution and Donatist Identity in the Liber Genealogus 127 Alan DEARN Augustine's Commentaries on the Old Testament: A Mariological Perspective 137 Pauline ALLEN APOCRYPHA AND THE LITERARY PAST IN LATE ANTIQUITY Scott Fitzgerald JOHNSON ^ 1. INTRODUCTION In the third chapter of her pioneering Sather Classical Lectures - Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Dis­ course (Berkeley-Los Angeles, 1991) - Averil Cameron took up the ques­ tion of the popularity of non-canonical stories and legends about Jesus, Mary, and the apostles in early Christianity and Late Antiquity. She titled this chapter 'Stories People Want' (pp. 89-119), emphasizing the role of these texts for the formation of early Christian 'world-views', alongside and often in contradiction to the canonical stories or 'myths' of the Gospels and other New Testament books^.
    [Show full text]
  • Achilles As an Allegorical Anti-Adam in the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies Benjamin De Vos
    Achilles as an Allegorical Anti-Adam in the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies Benjamin De Vos n the Garden of Eden, the first couple Adam and Eve were troubled by the question whom they should believe, God or the serpent. This Genesis story (Gen 2:4–3:24) has been I 1 often adapted from ancient times to the present day. Par- ticularly in the early centuries of our era, the Genesis story was the subject of disputes concerning free will and sin, sex and abstinence, death and life. Early Christian authors like Irenaeus of Lyon and Methodius of Olympus approached the story as a confirmation of human free will. Others like Augustine inter- preted it as the ‘fall’ of the first humans, from an act of their free will, into a state of inherent sinfulness. In early Christian- ity, it was also the subject of various apocryphal texts like the Life of Adam and Eve or the Gnostic Apocalypse of Adam.2 1 On the reception of the story in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic traditions see H. N. Wallace et al., “Adam and Eve, Story of,” in C. Furey et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception (Berlin 2009) 341–364; J. D. G. Dunn, “Adam,” and M. Meiser, “Adam and Eve,” in D. G. Hunter et al. (eds.), Brill Encyclopedia of Early Christianity Online (2018), consulted 13 March 2020. For later traditions see for example P .C. Almond, Adam and Eve in Seven- teenth-Century Thought (Cambridge 1999), and S. Greenblatt, The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve (New York 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Second-Century Christian “Heretics” Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae Formerly Philosophia Patrum
    A Companion to Second-Century Christian “Heretics” Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae Formerly Philosophia Patrum Texts and Studies of Early Christian Life and Language Editor J. den Boeft – J. van Oort – W.L. Petersen D.T. Runia – C. Scholten – J.C.M. van Winden VOLUME 76 A Companion to Second-Century Christian “Heretics” Edited by Antti Marjanen & Petri Luomanen BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2005 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A companion to second-century Christian “heretics” / edited by Antti Marjanen & Petri Luomanen. p. cm.—(Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae, ISSN 0920-623; v. 76) Including bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 90-04-14464-1 (alk. paper) 1. Heresies, Christian. 2. Heretics, Christian—Biography. 3. Church history—Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600. I. Marjanen, Antti. II. Luomanen, Petri, 1961-. III. Series. BT1319.C65 2005 273'.1—dc22 2005047091 ISSN 0920-623X ISBN 90 04 14464 1 © Copyright 2005 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands CONTENTS Preface .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of Thomas Commentary
    Gospel of Thomas Commentary BLATZ LAYTON DORESSE [Prologue.] These are the [Prologue.] These are the [Prologue.] Here are the secret words which the living obscure sayings that the secret words which Jesus the Jesus spoke, and which living Jesus uttered and Living spoke, and which Didymus Judas Thomas which Didymus Jude Didymus Jude Thomas wrote wrote down. Thomas wrote down. down. DORESSE - Oxyrhynchus ATTRIDGE - Oxyrhynchus Here are the [secret] words which Jesus the (Prologue) These are the [secret] sayings Living spoke an[d which were transcribed [which] the living Jesus [spoke, and which by Didymus Jude] Thomas. Judas, who is] also Thomas, [wrote down]. Scholarly Quotes Marvin Meyer writes: “The incipit, or opening of the document, provides what is most likely the earlier version of the title. A second, later title is given at the end of the document: ‘The Gospel According to Thomas.’ A similar incipit opens another document from the Nag Hammadi Library, Book of Thomas 138, 1-4: ‘The hidden sayings that the savior spoke to Judas Thomas, which I, Mathaias, in turn recorded. I was walking, listening to them speak with each other.’“ (The Gospel of Thomas: The Hidden Sayings of Jesus, p. 67) Marvin Meyer suggests that “the living Jesus” is “probably not the resurrected Christ as commonly understood, but rather Jesus who lives through his sayings.” (The Gospel of Thomas: The Hidden Sayings of Jesus, p. 67) Joseph A. Fitzmyer writes: “logoi: The use of this word to designate the ‘sayings’ of Jesus in these fragments should be noted. Nowhere do we find logia used of these sayings; Grenfell and Hunt were, therefore, not accurate in entitling the preliminary publication of Oxy P 1 Logia Iesou, which did not, of course, become apparent until the discovery of Oxy P 654.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter in the Apocryphal Tradition
    18 Peter in the Apocryphal Tradition Nicholas J. Frederick Nicholas J. Frederick is an assistant professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University. tudents who take New Testament classes studying Acts through Revelation Sare often perplexed when they realize fully how much Paul’s writings domi- nate class discussions. They study fourteen of Paul’s letters (if one counts the Epistle to the Hebrews as part of the Pauline corpus) and only two of Peter’s let- ters. They wonder why Peter, such an integral figure in the Gospels and the head of the church following Jesus’ death, could have left such a minute accounting of his post-Ascension activity, especially compared to Paul, a latecomer to the church. At this point, I attempt to assuage some of their frustration by pointing out that Peter, while he may be somewhat underrepresented or marginalized in the New Testament epistles, is actually a popular figure in the noncanoni- cal literature that arises during the second and third centuries of Christianity. Whereas 1 and 2 Peter represent the sum total of Peter’s canonical work (with the possible addition of the Gospel of Mark),1 there are at least fourteen differ- ent noncanonical, or apocryphal, works that either claim Petrine authorship or attribute a major role to Peter.2 However, there exists an added degree of difficulty when it comes to reading about Peter (or anyone, for that matter) in the apocryphal literature. Readers can 338 Nicholas J. Frederick study the letters of Paul and find references to his life or gain insights into his temperament and character.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virgin and the Priest: the Making of the Messiah
    The Virgin And The Priest The Making Of The Messiah Mark Gibbs The Vineyard Press To My Wife, Desak The Virgin and The Priest: The Making of The Messiah ISBN: 1438207063 EAN 13: 9781438207063 Frontispiece: Andrea Mantegna, Presentation at the Temple, c.1460 Cover: Raphael, The Marriage of Mary, 1525 Picture Credits: page 69, 73, 78, 111, 275, 289, 292 (Art Resource) 218 (Corbis). www.thevirginandthepriest.com Contents Preface Introduction 1. Supremacy of Blood 2. The Family of the New Abraham 3. Zacharias and Mary 4. Angel of the Lord 5. The Kingmakers 6. Sibling Rivalry 7. Dead Sea Scrolls 8. Legacy of Messianic Conflict Conclusion Notes Bibliography Index Preface Church attendance in developed nations has been on a downward spiral for the best part of a century. The strong likelihood is that it will continue to decline. In the past, almost everyone was a churchgoer. But today, irrespective of whether or not they believe in God, the majority of the population regards organized religion as an anachronism. Increased levels of education since the end of World War II brought with them a greater demand for intellectual satisfaction. Now, most people will only accept something as ‘true’ if it can be explained by reason or else resonates with their experience. Absolute ‘truths’ must pertain to reality. Not reality as perception, but reality which is the same for everyone. Doctrines that insist on faith in the irrational and unfamiliar no longer have mass appeal, because by implication, they are not true. Formerly, the Church could withdraw some of its erroneous tenets, for example, that the sun orbits the earth, because they were incidental to its central theology.
    [Show full text]