Federal Register Volume 31 • 'Number 9.1

FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 31 • 'NUMBER 9.1

Wednesday, May 11, 1966 • Washington, D.C.

Pages 6887-6939

Agencies in this issue— Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Commodity Credit Corporation Comptroller of the Currency Customs Bureau Emergency Planning Office Engineers Corps Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interstate Commerce Commission Labor Department Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration Renegotiation Board Securities and Exchange Commission Detailed list o f Contents appears inside. Just Released CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

(As of January 1, 1966)

Title 17—Commodity and Securities Exchanges (Pocket Supplement) $1.00

[A cumulative checklist of CFR issuances for 1966 appears in the first issue of the Federal Register each month under Title 11

Order from Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402

Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or FEDERALMREGISTER on the day after an official Federal holiday!, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (m ail address National Area Code 202 V , >934 ¿ y Phone 963—3261 Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admin istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages and 5 cents for each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code of F ederal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pur suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code of F ederal R egulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal R egister issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code of F ederal R eg u latio ns. C o n t e n t s

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION See Commodity Credit Corpora Rules and Regulations Rules and Regulations tion. Standard instrument approach Administrative opinions and rul ings: ARMY DEPARTMENT procedures; miscellaneous amendments______6894 Agreement among retailers for See Engineers Corps. Restricted area; designation_____ 6893 uniform store hours______6906 Goods of like grade and quality. 6906 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Proposed Rule Making Rules and Regulations Control zone and transition areas; FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Contractors; employees and con alteration______6908 Rules and Regulations sultants; miscellaneous amend Notices Sport fishing at St. Marks Na ments______6907 tional Wildlife Refuge, Fla_____ 6893 WMAL-TV—WTOP-TV ; affirma CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD tion of determination of no haz FOOD AND DRUG ard to air navigation______6915 Notices ADMINISTRATION Latin American service mail rate FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Rules and Regulations proceedings______6912 COMMISSION Belladonna; warning and caution statements______6906 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Proposed Rule Making Rules and Regulations Aeronautical advisory service. .1 . 6909 HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND Excepted service: WELFARE DEPARTMENT General Accounting Office-----6903 Notices Health, Education, and Welfare Hearings, etc.: See Food and Drug Administra Department (2 documents)__ 6903 Century Broadcasting Co., Inc., tion. and RKO General, Inc______6916 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT City Index Corp. and John M. INTERIOR DEPARTMENT See Maritime Administration. McLendon______1 6917 See Fish and Wildlife Service; Cosmopolitan Enterprises, Inc., Land Management Bureau. COMMODITY CRÉDIT and H. H. Huntley______6917 Northwestern Indiana Broad INTERSTATE COMMERCE CORPORATION casting Corp., et al______6917 Rules and Regulations Sherman, Gordon, and Omicron COMMISSION Dry edible bean loan and purchase Television Corp______6918 Notices program, 1966 and subsequent Sports Network, Inc., and Amer Class rates and per-shipment crops______6904 ican Telephone and Telegraph charges, middlewest, central, Co______6918 and southwest states______6937 COMPTROLLER OF THE W DIX, Inc., and Radio Orange Fourth section applications for burg, Inc______6920 CURRENCY relief______s______6938 Rules and Regulations Motor carrier: FEDERAL HOME LOAN Alternate route deviation no Investment securities; State of tices______.______6931 Israel Bonds, Development In- J BANK BOARD Applications and certain other vestment Issue______6905 Rules and Regulations proceedings (2 documents). . . 6933, CUSTOMS BUREAU Federal Home Loan Bank System ; 6936 organization and operations; Intrastate applications______6937 Proposed Rule Making compensation and budgets.—__ 6905 Temporary authority applica Disposition of unclaimed and tions______6929 abandoned merchandise; rescis FEDERAL MARITIME Railroads; rerouting of traffic____ 6937 sion of proposed amendment___ 6908 Notices COMMISSION LABOR DEPARTMENT International Paper Co.; U.S. citi- Notices Notices zenship______;______6912 Cargofast Pacific, Inc.; revocation Office of Federal Contract Com of license______6925 pliance (EEO) ; establishment_ 6921 DEFENSE DEPARTMENT LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU See Engineers Corps. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Rules and Regulations EMERGENCY PLANNING OFFICE Notices Utah; public land order adding to Notices Hearings, etc.: Ouray National Wildlife Ref- Voluntary Tanker Plan for Con Atlantic Refining Co______6923 u ge------6907 tribution of Tanker Capacity B & G Oil & Gas Co. et al______6922 Notices Central Illinois Public Service for National Defense Require- Louisiana; proposed withdrawal__6912 ments; membership: Co. and Panhandle Eastern Additions______6926 Pipe Line Co______6924 MARITIME ADMINISTRATION Deletions______6926 Kentucky Gas Transmission Corp.------.... ____ 6924 Rules and Regulations ENGINEERS CORPS National Sulphur Co______6925 Shipping; values for war risk in St. Joseph Light & Power Co. surance ______:a______6891 Rules and Regulations and Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Bridges; Mystic River, Mass_____ 6907 Line Co ______,__r____ 6925 {Continued on next page) 6889 6890 CONTENTS

RENEGOTIATION BOARD Rules and Regulations Conduct of renegotiation; filing of information and requests by contractor______6906 Notices Organization; location of Western Regional Board______6926 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Notices Hearings, etc.: American-Amicable Life Insur ance Co______6926 Columbia Gas System, Inc_____ 6927 Dunfee Savings & Lease______6928 Enterprise Securities Fund, m e. 6928 Television-Electronics Fund, In c ______6928 TREASURY DEPARTMENT See Comptroller of the Currency; Customs Bureau.

List of CFR Parts Affected

(Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1966, and specifies how they are affected.

5 CFR 16 CFR 41 CFR 213 (3 documents) 6903 15 (2 documents) 6906 9-12______6907 43 CFR 7 CFR 19 CFR P u b l ic L an d O rder : 1421______6904 P roposed R u l e s : 20 _1______6908 3999______;___. 6907 12 CFR 21 CFR 46 CFR l ______6905 131______6906 309______6891 522______6905 524_!______6905 32 CFR 47 CFR 1472______6906 P roposed R u l e s : 14 CFR 2______6909 73______L„ 6893 33 CFR 87______6909 97______— 6894 203------6907 P roposed R u l e s : 50 CFR 71______6908 33______6893 6891 Rules and Regulations

Stated Stated Title 46— SHIPPING Binder Name of vessel Official valuation Binder Name of vessel Official valuation No. No. (in thou No. No. (in thou Chapter II;—Maritime Administration, sands) sands) Department of Commerce 831 American Eagle...... 278327 6,660 186 Colina______242775 555 SUBCHAPTER G— EMERGENCY OPERATIONS 1769 American Falcon.____ 252524 1,000 1163 Colorado______252492 555 534 American Forester____ 248074 555 1978 Columbia Victory____ 247765 525 [General Order 82,14th Rev., Arndt. 1] 1791 American Hawk...... 243969 1,000 711 Constitution State____ 245985 593 1665 American Hunter____ 252679 655 1588 Continental II...... 1650 1,015 PART 309— VALUES FOR WAR RISK 541 American Leader_____ 249517 555 1589 Continental III...... 1695 1,030 940 American Mail______247321 1,000 712 Copper State______244137 1,000 INSURANCE 542 American Manufac 713 Cotton State______248440 525 turer______247643 555 704 Cottonwood Creek___ 246864 1,560 Part 309 is hereby amended by adding 545 American Miller______243873 555 1305 Council Grove".______247896 2,150 1688 American Oriole_____ 252304 1,000 1051 Cradle of Liberty_____ 467 1,520 a new section following § 309.101 reading 546 American Packer_____ 243982 555 1538 C. R. Musser...... 246754 525 as follows: 549 American Press______247590 555 683 Custis Woods______245009 555 550 American Producer___ 254616 655 1355 Cyclone______245751 * 525 § 309.102 Values effective January 1, 1679 American Robin_____ 242941 1,000 137 Cynthia Olson______253441 115 554 American Scientist.... 254653 555 1343 David D. Irwin______242354 2,300 1966. 1902 American Trader_____ 244855 930 212 David E. Day______248880 1,875 561 American Veteran____ 247296 555 1979 Del Aires______252445 555 (a) Vessels covered by §§ 309.3 163 America Sun.______240147 495 165 Delaware Sun______264853 3,430 through 309.5. (1) The Maritime Ad 272 Ames Victory...... 247292 593 319 Del Campo______241923 382 1485 Amoco Connecticut__ 242851 1,600 323 Del Monte______246628 368 ministration has found that the values 1488 Amoco Delaware_____ 245058 L 550 2012 De Soto______245398 566 established in accordance with §§ 309.3- 1768 Amoco Louisiana_____ 244329 1,725 377 Dolly Tinman______249747 655 309.5 constitute just compensation for 1482 Amoco Maryland____ 242509 640 1681 Duval. ______245641 525 1484 Amoco New York____ 244801 762 700 Eagle Courier______277561 5,900 the vessels to which they apply, computed 1486 Amoco Virginia. _____ 243518 1,725 699 Eagle Transporter____ 277710 5,910 as provided in sections 902(a) and 1209 641 Am tank.______247968 975 697 Eagle Traveler..-_____ 278442 6,700 1914 Anchorage______246736 3,500 698 Eagle Voyager______278624 6,690 (a), Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as 2008 Andrew Jackson______247303 566 167 Eastern Sun. 270025 3,900 amended; and pursuant thereto has de 19 Angelo Petri______243882 3,540 1994 East Hills______245914 555 1040 A. N. Kemp______149 850 187 Eclipse______267144 3,100 termined the values of the vessels cov 2009 Antinous... ______245979 566 786 Edgar F. Luckenbach. 248882 1,350 ered by interim binders for war risk hull 1444 Arizona Standard___ 248736 555 2078 Elaine______247049 525 1039 Atholl McBean______141 835 1917 Elizabethport...... 297001 4,600 insurance, Form MA-184, prescribed by 232 Atlantic Communi 1623 Elwell______245837 655 Part 308 of this chapter. cator______268196 3,725 705 Empire State______248212 565 (2) The interim binders listed below 233 Atlantic Endeavor___ 277623 5,950 830 Ema Elizabeth..____ 280193 6,920 234 Atlantic Engineer____ 261167 3,190 983 Esso Baltimore______282272 9,220 shall be deemed to have been amended as 1004 Atlantic Enterprise___ 276911 5,890 987 Esso Bangor______264791 3,300 of January 1, 1966, by inserting in the 1006 Atlantic Navigator___ 261423 3,220 1312 Esso Bogota______775 239 Atlantic Trader____ 248007 1,910 984 Esso Boston______283784 9,390 space provided therefor or in substitu 871 A tlas______277291 6,700 1310 Esso Brooklyn______310 tion for any value now appearing in such 418 Attleboro Victory____ 247475 465 989 Esso Chester______264445 3,050 789 Audrey J. Lucken- 248884 1,350 1378 Esso Colon______765 space the stated valuation of the vessels bach. 988 Esso Dallas 259248 2,600 set forth below for the binders and ves 1435 Austin...... 247455 2,250 990 Esso Florence______266855 3,250 sels as designated. Such stated valu 2099 Australian Isle______256787 582 1007 Esso Gettysburg_____ 273362 6,750 2107 Boise Victory______248786 593 991 Esso Gloucester______265336 3,150 ation shall apply with respect to insur 1986 Bowling Green____ _ 244750 555 993 Esso Huntington_____ 266329 3,300 ance attaching dining the period Janu 1816 Bradford Island______247640 555 994 Esso Jamestown...... 275519 7,050 1490 Brazos______247583 850 995 Esso Lexington______276270 7,180 ary 1, 1966, to June 30, 1966, inclusive; 1593 Brighton______4445-59 2,210 996 Esso Lima...... 259142 2,590 Provided, however, That the Assured 1473 Brooklyn Heights____ 247872 525 992 Esso Miami______259357 2,580 shall have the right within 60 days after 353 Buckeye State______244577 1,000 1313 Esso Montevideo_____ 735 1337 Burgan______1538 785 997 Esso Newark...... 264231 3,020 date of publication of this section or 226 Byron D. Benson...... 246173 555 998 Esso New York__ ... 259610 2,650 within 60 days after the attachment of 941 California Mail 252476 1,000 1314 Esso Norfolk______326 297 Californian______249239 2,860 1315 Esso Santos______... 780 the insurance under said binder, which 963 California Standard__ 262403 345 1014 Esso Scranton______245830 555 ever is later, to reject such valuation and 1949 Calmar...... 294756 4,500 1898 Esso Seattle______277935 6,570 1575 Caltex Bangkok .. 2244-48 325 1009 Esso Washington_____ 273896 6,860 proceed as authorized by section 1209 1576 Caltex Capetown . 2246-48 325 2079 Evanthie______240203 1,000 (a) (2), Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as 1577 Caltex Copenhagen___ 2245-48 325 354 Evergreen State_____ 257827 1,000 amended. 1578 Caltex Durban______2243-48 > 325 2080 Eviliz.______245672 525 1579 Caltex Genoa. . 2248-48 325 855 Exilona______252303 760 1580 Caltex Gothenburg___ 2249-48 325 858 Expeditor______251971 760 1581 Caltex Manila______2247-48 325 865 Express..______252376 760 Stated 1585 Caltex Stockholm____ 2070-47 325 2027 Express Buffalo______247252 593 Binder Name of vessel } Official valuation 426 Canada Bear______247385 593 1938 Express Virginia______249290 555 No. No. (in thou 1424 Canterbury Leader___ 247868 260 262 Fairland______242073 2,225 sands) 1370 Cantigny______247452 2,225 2075 Fairisle______245627 593 07 Carbide Seadrift______241851 2,000 2013 Fairport______„___ 249072 566 08 Carbide Texas City__ 242532 2; 000 2037 Fairwind______247042 275 870 Achilles______281702 $8,320 1931 Chancellorsville______244460 2,025 1868 Fanwood______252355 555 722 African Glade______245035 555 1213 Chatham...... 252493 555 1536 F. E. Weyerhaeuser__ 245564 525 723 African Glen______247294 555 333 Chemical Transporter 244942 1,170 153 Floridian. 282733 1,125 724 African Grove______244877 555 243 Chena ...... 242704 297 1810 Flower Hill______252446 555 605 Alamar______245810 500 597 Cherry Valley______242531 555 218 Flying A-California__ 268216 1,315 1269 Alaska Bear______246004 593 964 Chevron______250641 245 221 Flying A-Delaware___ 267997 3,360 1790 Alcoa Commander___ 248327 655 1041 Chevron Transporter.. 132 825 220 Flying A-New Y ork .. 267198 3,310 1793 Alcoa Explorer______248335 555 610 Chilore______253219 2,300 219 Flying A-Washington . 268783 1,340 1620 Alcoa Mariner______247572 555 2010 Choctaw______242785 655 1469 Flying Clipper______252991 565 1748 Alcoa Marketer...... 245539 655 1990 Choctaw Victory_____ 247420 593 1480 Flying Cloud______247000 555 1711 Alcoa Master...... 253572 555 1813 Cities Service Balti 1468 Flying E a g le ...... 251664 555 1463 Alcoa Ranger______253116 562 more______271866 5,710 1479 Flying Enterprise I I . . 245734 555 1461 Alcoa Roamer______252567 662 1814 Cities Service Miami. 272077 5,740 1472 Flying Gull.'______240462 555 1460 Alcoa Runner______245375 562 1815 Cites Service Norfolk.. 272839 5,850 1471 Flying Hawk______240632 555 1802 Alcoa Trader______248144 555 1050 Cities Service Valley 1478 Flying Spray...... 246217 365 1749 Alcoa Voyager______253289 555 Forge. ______401 1,490 1481 Flying Trader______248750 525 1850 Aldina______239754 490 2011 City of Alma______247592 566 584 Fort Fetterman 244935 1,650 1061 Aldine______841 325 101 Claiborne______242378 555 1211 Fort Hoskins 248735 2,175 659 Alice Brown...... 249027 555 1967 Cleveland______243450 555 247 Fortuna 245880 275 1552 Alma Victory...... 248201 593 266 Coeur D ’Alene 247113 593 498 Four Lakes______244971 1,725 352 Aloha State______243297 1,000 Victory. 380 Frank Lykes___ 245640 555 1972 American Condor...... 252347 1,000 273 Coe Victory______247894 593 177 Fruitvalé H ills...... 248716 555

FEDERAL I, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6892 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Stated Stated Stated Binder Ñame of vessel Official valuation Binder Name of vessel Official valuation Binder Name of vessel Official valuation No. No. (in thou No. No. (in thou No. No. (in thou sands) sands) sands)

962 F. S. Bryant______250827 540 788 Lena Luckenbach____ 244049 1,000 1953 Point Sur...... 243263 555 1035 Gage Lund______217 900 391 Letitia Lykes...... 246897 555 16 Ponca City______244335 555 585 Gaines Mill______244464 1,625 1052 Liberty Bell______519 1,530 1999 Portmar______294731 4,500 248 Galena______248122 250 293 Lompoc______248653 585 1505 Potomac______248800 2,550 1839 Garden City...... 252444 555 267 Longview Victory____ 247077 593 1390 Prairie Grove...... 246660 2,250 948 Garden State______248057 593 1918 Los Angeles______241153 4,600 1897 President Harding...... 252443 555 263 Gateway City...... 251506 2,225 613 Losmar.______245111 500 919 Producer______245888 2,550 1539 George S. Long______245913 525 367 Louisiana Sulphur...... 242964 1,340 228 Providence Getty____ 254689 245 384 Gibbes Lykes...... 245182 555 658 Lucile Bloomfield___ 249291 555 2064 Pure Oil______248837 620 1298 Globe Carrier______243503 2,550 2019 Madaket______246992 566 1273 P. W. Thirtle...... 270179 3,350 1209 Globe Progress______244888 2,550 716 Magnolia State...... 247144 525 1301 Rainbow______247026 525 1874 Globe Traveler______289436 2,910 394 Mallory Lykes______244881 555 1869 Ranger______244598 555 1885 Glory of the Seas_____ 245169 555 1356 Manhattan__ :______287253 16,700 264 Raphael Semmes_____ 242074 2,225 714 Golden State______246544 525 275 Mankato Victory._____ 248739 593 972 R. C. Stoner______243128 590 355 Gopher State______244979 1,000 2105 Marathon Victory__ .. 248563 593 1475 Remsen Heights...... 247865. 525 2073 Green Bay...... 248912 1,650 660 Margarett Brown_____ 249174 555 09 R. E. Wilson...... 244090 710 885 Gre6n Cove...... 247268 555 2087 Marine Clipper______248655 650 1162 Richmond______._ 241939 485 1129 Green Dale...... 251748 555 15 Marine Dow-Chem___ 267278 3,850 1859 Ridgefield Victory____ 247454 593 886 Green Harbour______247760 950 1510 Marine Electric...... 245675 3,060 1038 Robert Watt Miller... 172 855 887 Green Island______247079 950 1570 Marine Merchant_____ 247867 260 155 Robin Goodfellow____ 247254 1,000 2036 Green Lake______248700 1,650 90 Marine Shipper______247596 260 156 Robin Gray______252626 1,000 950 Green Mountain State. 247158 525 91 Marine Trader______247274 260 157 Robin Hood______247255 1,000 1950 Green Port______252346 1,000 92 Marine Transport____ 247991 290 158 Robin Kirk______254272 1,000 1901 Green Ridge...... 247322 1,000 168 Maryland Sun______246101 555 160 Robin Mowbray_____ 255316 1,000 889 Green Valley...... 247950 950 664 M aryland Trader ... 247178 1,650 162 Robin Trent______254641 1,000 890 Green Wave______X. 252351 555 1940 Mary mar______294730 4,500 172 Sabine Sun______241558 530 1249 Guam Bear...... 252570 555 01 Mayflower.______284049 9,240 1879 Sacramento...... 245497 2,680 790 Gulfbear______247309 1,570 1512 Meado wbrook______289879 2,275 422 San Angelo Victory___ 248842 , 525 791 Gulfbeaver...... 243657 1,550 969 M. E. Lombardi...... 240228 280 1919 San Francisco______241220 4,600 792 Gulfcrest______279334 6,090 1286 Meteor------247331 525 1920 San Juan...... 242653 4,600 793 Gulfdeer______245727 1,760 681 Michigan______240590 1,000 891 Santa Adela______242243 555 794 Gulfj aguar______246972 1,840 1425 Midland ... ______246355 555 1811 Santa Emilia...... 247570 555 795 Quitting______275193 6,160 587 Mill Spring ;______244468 1,700 900 Santa Flavia______242762 555 796 Gulf knight______277183 6,440 2033 Missouri. .. ______248885 1,900 903 Santa Juana...... 242111 555 797 Gulflion______246990 1,940 1271 M. L. Gosney______266338 2,980 906 Santa Malta______245459 555 808 Gulflube______254406 575 188 Mobil Aero______278471 6,240 211 Santa Maria______263781 1, 270 798 Gulfoil______283424 6,350 189 Mobil Fuel______274588 5,330 619 Santoro...______254624 2,300 799 Gulfpanther...... 246543 1,760 190 Mobilgas . ______271449 4,820 1822 Sasètown...... 1876 995 800 Gulfpride______279769 6,370 191 Mobil Lube______275651 5,480 26 Sealady...... 244457 525 801 Gulfprince...... 276034 192 Mobiloil______279064 6,330 1970 Seamar______294729 4,500 6,310 262558 802 Gulfqueen______275583 6,220 193 Mobil Power______274966 5,380 65 Seatrain Georgia_____ 1,075 805 Gulfseal______247557 1,850 420 Moline Victory______247346 525 66 Seatrain Louisiana___ 262835 1,075 811 Gulfservice...... 264224 1,330 2095 Mona Pass...... 2389 325 67 Seatrain New Jersey__ 239688 625 803 Gulfsolar______6,240 601 Monmouth______242426 555 68 Seatrain New York___ 231905 360 280223 231916 360 806 Gulfspray...... 282848 6,600 2110 Monarch of the Seas... 244794 555 69 Seatrain Savannah___ 807 Gulfstag...... 1265 Monticello Victory___ 286819 9,440 70 Seatrain Texas______239549 625 251066 1,710 247275 3,500 1358 Gulfsupreme______287186 7,050 1447 Montpelier Victory___ 289745 9,500 1921 Seattle______804 Gulftiger______34 Mormacfir...... 248650 593 336 Sierra______247831 1,000 247767 1,940 1476 Sir John Franklin 244734 365 1659 Halcyon Panther...... 245922 593 50 Mormacrio...______248745 1,000 646 Mount Vernon Victory. 9,240 1266 Sister Katingo...... 277936 6,560 Hampton Roads_____ 248748 975 281 284178 268801 3,320 1891 Hanover______246934 255 250 Nadina______245864 290 202 Socony Vacuum...... 824 ' Hans Isbrandtsen____ 588 Naeco______244063 1,500 337 Sonoma______252413 1,000 277703 6,520 357 Sooner State______247139 555 2014 Hastings______246617 566 648 Nashbulk______247307 975 298 Hawaiian______1758 National Defender...... 279938 11,370 1803 Southport I I ...... 245183 555 249353 2,860 1049 Statue of Liberty_____ 420 1,505 300 Hawaiian Builder____ 247386 1,000 2034 Neches______244235 555 985 Hawaiian Citizen...... 251 Nenana...... 247015 275 1016 Steel Admiral...... 252403 1,000 252149 3,750 439 245731 1,000 301 Hawaiian Craftsman.. 247826 1,000 1441 Nevada Standard...... 247758 555 Steel Advocate______Neva West______249283 555 440 Steel Age______244161 1,000 303 Hawaiian Farmer____ 245860 1,000 661 441 252498 1,000 304 Hawaiian Merchant... 248845 1,000 421 Newberry Victory____ 248460 525 Steel Apprentice...... 305 Hawaiian Packer_____ 169 New Jersey Sun______265748 3,510 442 Steel Architect...... 247168 1,000 243929 1,000 443 Steel Artisan...... 1,000 307 Hawaiian Planter____ 248741 1,000 180 New Market...... 247276 555 247833 New York______248742 1,000 444 Steel Chemist...... 252037 1,000 308 Hawaiian Rancher___ 246204 1,000 683 445 247832 309 Hawaiian Refiner____ 245594 2038 New Yorker______283030 1,125 Steel Designer______1,000 1,000 446 Steel Director...... 244978 1,000 1445 Hawaii Standard_____ 248802 555 2118 New Zealand Victory.. 245474 593 H. D. Collier______1668 Norberto Capay______244133 S 555 447 Steel Executive______248843 1,000 965 248737 555 448 Steel Fabricator...... 251781 1,000 873 Helen H ..._...... 245029 2,550 1658 Norina______247468 2,910. 385 Helen Lykes______592 Northfield______243253 2,050 449 Steel Flyer______244831 1,000 245245 555 450 Steel King...... 252499 1,000 1667 Hercules Victory_____ 248657 525 1993 North Hillg...... 245040 555 634 Hess Bunker______243804 268 Northwestern Victory. 247492 593 451 Steel Maker...... 247221 1,000 2,025 452 Steel Navigator ____ 635 Hess Diesel______248127 2,050 1466 Norwalk ______245848 525 248846 1,000 Ocean Anna______266619 3,470 453 Steel Recorder...... 251847 1,000 638 ■ Hess Petrol______244735 2,025 1827 454 Steel Rover...... 1373 Hess Refiner______248244 2,050 2112 Ocean Dinny______244215 555 252500 1,000 Hess Trader______246104 Ocean Evelyn______249217 1,350 455 Steel Scientist...... 245730 1,000 639 2,000 931 456 Steel Seafarer______961 Hillyer Brown______266233 1,350 1297 Oceanic.______246006 510 248738 1,000 Oceanic Cloud______555 457 Steel Surveyor______244968 1,000 706 Hoosier State______247762 1,350 1988 251970 458 1540 Horace Irvine...... 246933 525 1895 Oceanic Spray______245532 555 Steel Traveler...... 247198 1,000 Oceanic T id e ______555 459 Steel Vendor______246464 1,000 787 Horace Luckenbach... 245644 1,000 1896 244612 460 176 Houston...______242636 2,250 932 Ocean U lla...... 280004 7,200 Steel Voyager______252501 1,000 Oceanic Wave______465 461 Steel Worker______247834 1,000 1252 Hudson______244463 1,560 1894 248065 252 2015 Hurricane______246798 555 684 Ohio______246388 1,000 Susitna______248389 250 Ohio Sun______404 Sylvia Lykes______247841 555 2016 Iberville______248489 566 170 244089 555 203 1,000 1992 Old Westbury______245338 555- Sÿosset______247458 545 679 Id ah o------252271 253 Talkeetna...... 245733 968 Idaho Standard._____ 245461 555 1386 Olga...... 247316 593 275 1415 Tampico...... 246344 2, 250 249 Iliamna ...... 246848 299 971 Oregon Standard_____ 246773 555 254 1093 Oswego Leader______1258 325 Tanana______247310 250 432 India Bear______252568 555 255 Tatalina______247995 945 Java M ail...... 252478 1,000 1825 Our Lady of Peace___ 247571 555 250 Overseas Rose______1430 Texaco Bristol______3481-GE 900 1285 J. E. Dyer.. ______- 274440 6,080 785 245923 1,000 463 717 Palmetto State______247823 525 Texaco California.__ 266910 1,815 274 Jefferson City 464 Texaco Colorado_____ 593 1217 Panoceanic Faith_____ 245134 555 241758 480 Victory______247345 465 Texaco Connecticut__ 266501 1,735 970 J. H. MacGaregill.-.^. 248896 555 1037 Paul Pigott______163 855 P. C. Spencer...... 466 Texaco Florida...... 271820 2,000 973 J. H. Tuttle______—. 242955 590 1272 264903 2,870 -1867 718 Pelican State...... 245354 593 Texaco Georgia______293819 6,510 967 J. L. H an na.______248531 555 469 Texaco Illinois...... 246993 2,000 2017 John B. Waterman___ 249234 566 1592 Penn Carrier 246908 555 Penn Challenger...... 471 Texaco Kansas_____ 244230 1,900 829 John C ______242701 555 339 280318 6,970 1077 1342 Penn Exporter______247099 1,560 Texaco Kentucky...... 2439-50 790 1017 John F. Shea______247095 950 1218 Texaco London....___ 1166 900 1535 John Weyerhaeuser___ 245356 525 1954 Pennmaf 295108 4,500 Penn Sailor______473 Texaco Louisiana...... 245053 555 586 Julesburg__ ...... — 243523 1,750 1860 275391 1,625 1596 171 Pennsylvania Sun____ 280202 9,500 Texaco M ain e.______4500-59 2,250 612 Kenmar______. .. 246062 V 500 1823 Texaco Maryland____ 292735 6,370 598 Keystoner______266730 1,385 1008 Penn Transporter____ 248437 1,560 1824 341 Penn Vanguard______242780 525 Texaco Massachusetts. 290306 6.140 356 Keystone State______247763 1,350 475 Texaco Minnesota____ 243202 265644 581 Perry ville______244644 1,975 2,325 599 Keytanker..______1,355 476 Texaco Mississippi___ 245082 2,325 600 Keytrader______267905 1,420 662 Pioneer Cove ...... 249748 555 578 Pioneer Tide 249030 555 2028 Texaco Montana_____ 298918 6,930 2018 Kyska______248654 566 478 Texaco Nebraska...... 242845 1,950 110 La Salle______251504 566 1987 Plymouth Victory____ 245625 593 479 1754 Point Loma______246982 655 Texaco Nevada______245175 1,800 13 Leland I. Doan______284217 8,500 480 Texaco New Jersey___ 245831 1,775

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6893

attaching during the period January 1, Stated 1966, to June 30, 1966, inclusive; Pro Binder Name of vessel Official valuation Title 50— WILDLIFE AND No. No. (in thou vided, however, That the Assured shall sands) have the right within 60 days after date FISHERIES of publication of this section or Within 481 Texaco New York____ 265981 1,780 Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries 483 Texaco North Dakota. 265006 1,750 60 days after the attachment of the in and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife 1081 Texaco Ohio______2447-50 790 1873 Texaco Oklahoma____ 275882 6,260 surance under said binder, whichever is Service, Department of the Interior 1083 Texaco Pennsylvania.. 2438-50 780 later, to reject such valuation and pro 1899 Texaco Rhode Island.. 296380 6,700 PART 33— SPORT FISHING 1085 Texaco Texas______2448-50 785 ceed as authorized by section 1209(a) (2), 1270 Texaco Wisconsin..... 277805 6,540 Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended. St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, 489 Texaco Wyoming_____ 243048 2,025 209 Texan ______249352 1,550 Fla.; Correction 174 Texas Sun______283897 ' 10,030 497 The Cabins______246143 1,775 Stated In F.R. Doc. 66-1970, appearing at 925 Thetis ______279627 8,050 Binder Name of vessel Official valuation page 3117 of the issue for February 25, 2096 Thomas A ______260954 3,160 No. No. (in thou 1357 Thunderbird______247092 525 sands) 1966, subparagraph (3) is corrected to 1622 Thunderhead...... 246038 555 read as follows: 602 Ticonderoga______242244 745 182 Tillamook______245104 655 752 A. H. Dumont______239224 $88 (3) Boats with gasoline engines pro 1797 Timbo______1778 990 1906 Ahi...... 251250 200 hibited, electric motors permitted. 256 Tonsina______252547 275 1686 Atlantic______262007 155 2020 Topa Topa______247906 666 1186 Barge 114______9 W alter A. G resh, 1453 Transhay______247574 555 1187 Barge 116______12 881 Transborinquen______246540 365 1188 Barge 118______9 Regional Director, Bureau of 1722 Transcaribbean______248749 525 1197 Barge 129______9 Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. 231 Transe astern______279438 8,600 1198 27 1454 Transerie______245959 555 1199 10 M a y 3, 1966. 1456 Transhatteras______242942 555 1256 Blue Line 107...... 263055 190 1455 Transorleans...... 243223 555 1153 ...... 119 21 [F.R. Doc. 66-5102; Filed, May 10, 1966; 1598 Trinidad..______4336-58 2,140 1562 Challenger.'______283882 369 8:46 a.m.] 1492 Trinity______246600 930 1876 Con dado______293169 135 22 Trojan ______247177 2,125 1138 Cyrus Field______147699 170 2026 Trustco______244131 555 1165 15 590 Tullahoma______246662 1,975 1166 Dammam 8______255059 16 2091 U.S. Adventurer_____ 247220 593 1167 46 Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND 2092 U.S. Builder______247121 593 1168 46 1423 U.S. Caper______247194 593 1169 46 1409 U.S. Conqueror__ .... 245519 275 1170 62 SPACE 1422 U.S. Defender______248013 525 1171 Dammam 13______51 1395 U.S. Explorer______248565 593 1172 62 Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency 1613 U.S. Merriman _ 242477 275 1877 Dorado______.___ 293380 140 1842 U.S. Pecos______242949 275 1564 Everglades______279577 366 SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE 1436 U.S. Pilot...... - 245016 555 1563 Fort Lauderdale______250507 109 [Airspace Docket No. 66-WE-5] 1614 U.S. Red River______247511 275 24 George S______282206 111 1437 U.S. Tourist______248171 593 764 George Witlock II____ 241390 100 PART 73— SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 1410 U.S. Victory. ______245754 593 1150 H abib...... 112 17 966 Utah Standard______251140 540 1942 H. J. Sheridan______235802 60 338 Ventura______252633 1,000 1565 Hollywood------106 Designation of Restricted Area 666 Virginia Trader _____ 244789 555 1151 Home______... 115 18 719 Volunteer State______247792 525 765 Hygrade No. 2______270766 220 On March 15, 1966, a notice of pro 1946 Volusia...... 245415 525 767 Hygrade No. 8...... 176732 180 posed rule making was published in the 1805 Warm Springs______247264 275 768 Hygrade No. 14______250807 180 F ederal R egister 974 Washington Standard . 246203 555 769 Hygrade No. 18______272741 205 (31 F.R. 4415) stating 667 Washington Trader___ 245566 555 771 Hygrade No. 26______252977 195 that the Federal Aviation Agency was 1713 Wellesley Victory_____ 247564 593 772 Hygrade No. 28...... 253996 180 considering an amendment to Part 73 1779 Western Clipper______268288 3,600 773 Hygrade No. 30...... 264104 185 1780 Western Comet______266365 3,450 774 Hygrade No. 32______267113 195 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that 1302 Western Hunter_____ 287156 12,200 1908 Isleways No. 1______251436 51 would designate a restricted area in the 1781 Western Planet______268078 3,590 1909 Isleways No. 2______251519 51 175 Western Sun...... 268798 3,790 1910 Isleways No. 3______251682 51 vicinity of Sailor Creek, Idaho. 1900 Whitehall...... 245964 555 1911 Isleways No. 4...... 251773 51 Interested persons were afforded an 1537 W. H. Peabody...... 246065 525 1912 Isleways No. 5______251859 61 1389 Wilderness______247348 525 753 J. F. Gaffney______247436 65 opportunity to participate in the pro 2021 Wild Ranger...... 249518 655 1554 Lewis No. 8_____ :____ 244276 77 posed rule making through the submis 224 William F. Humphrey. 246557 555 1702 Mohawk ______254469 187 620 Wilmar______— 246507 500 741 Ocean King______248921 109 sion of comments but no comments were 1609 Windsor Victory______247843 593 742 Ocean Prince______276461 390 received. 1511 Wingless Victory______247243 525 1907 Ono ______252117 200 In consideration of the foregoing, 358 Wolverine State______248740 1,350 1502 Perth Amboy I ______171776 175 2022 Yaka______246335 566 1503 Perth Amboy II______171686 175 Part 73 of the Federal Aviation Regu 2098 Yellowstone______248883 1,900 759 Phillip Lender______215390 52 lations is amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., 2030 Yorkmar____ *______296261 4,500 1571 .. 289435 130 2103 Young America...... 243034 555 1719 Ponce de Leon______244296 77 July 21, 1966, as hereinafter set forth. 744 Port Jefferson______274512 378 In § 73.32 (31 F.R. 2312) the following 745 Providence______238312 67 is added: (b) Vessels of less than 1,500 gross 1176 Qatif 7______72 1177 Qatif 8______72 R-3202 Sailor Cr eek, I daho tons— As of January 1, 1966. (1) The 761 R. J. Perry______. 247205 65 Maritime Administration has determined 1148 Sandy... ______114 18 Boundaries: Beginning at latitude 42'48'- 1572 San Juan______289562 130 45" N., longitude 115°38'14" W.; to latitude for certain vessels of less than 1,500 gross 1278 Saratoga______254128 90 42°48’45" N., longitude 115°32'41" W.; to tons the values which constitute just 1263 Spartan______273515 430 746 Stamford______240942 71 latitude 42°40'00" N., longitude 115°32'41" compensation for the vessels to which 1152 Swigart. ______118 19 W.; to latitude 42°40'00" N., longitude 115°. they apply, computed as provided in sec 18 Virginia Phillips_____ 239971 64 38'14" W.L,to the point of beginning. tions 902(a) and 1209(a), Merchant 763 W . A. Weber...... 251392 69 Designated altitudes: Surface to 12,000 Marine Act, 1936, as amended; and pur feet MSL. N o te: The record-keeping and reporting Time of designation: From sunset to 4 suant thereto has determined the values requirements contained herein have been hours thereafter, Monday through Friday. of vessels covered by interim binders for approved by the Bureau of the Budget in Controlling agency: Federal Aviation war risk hull insurance Form MA-184 accordance with the Federal Reports Act of Agency, Salt Lake ARTC Center. prescribed in Part 308 of this chapter. 1942. Using agency: Commander, 67th Tactical Reconnaissance Wing, Mountain Home AFB, (2) The interim binders listed below (Sec. 204, 49 Stat. 1987, as amended; 46 Idaho. shall be deemed to have been amended U .S .0 .1114) (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958 as of January 1,1966, by inserting in the Dated; May 4, 1966. (49 U.S.C. 1348)) space provided therefor or in substitu Issued in Washington, D.C., on May tion for any value now appearing in such L . C. H o f f m a n n , 4, 1966. space the stated valuation of the vessels Chairman, Ship Valuation Committee. W i l l ia m E. M o r g a n , set forth below for the binders and ves Acting Director, Air Traffic Service. sels as designated. Such stated valua [F.R. Doc. 66-5074; Filed, May 10, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-5092; Filed, May 10, 1966; tion shall apply with respect to insurance 8:45 a jn .] 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6894 RULES AND REGULATIONS

SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES

[Beg. Docket No. 7196; Arndt. 473] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard Instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance v with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure^Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows: 1. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.11(b) to read: AD F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are In feet MSL. Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation. Distances are In nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an Instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— To— 2-engine, distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Holston Mountains VO RTA C ______Int B LA , R 200° and 310° bearing to Direct. 6000 T-dn______300-1 300-1 mo-14 LOM. C-dn...... 900-1 900-1H 900-2 Int BLA, R 200° and 310° bearing to LOM . LOM (MHW)-.L...... Direct. 3600 S-dn-22%______900-1 900-1 900-1 Telford Int______LOM (MHW)______...... Direct. 3600 A-dn...... 900-2 900-2 900-2 Yuma Int______... LOM (MHW)___ 1...... Direct. 4000 If aircraft has operating VO R receiver and Beaver Int Hilton Int...______LOM (MHW)...... Direct. 5000 received, minimums become: Greendale Int______,______LOM (MHW) (final)______.... Direct. 5000 C-dn. 800-1 800-114 800-2 Damascus Int______Int HMV, R 008° and 271° bearing to Direct. 6000 S-dn-22%. 800-1 800-1 800-1 LOM. Int HMV, R 008° and 271° bearing to LOM. LOM (MHW)______- ...... Direct. 3600 B O N RBn...... LOM (MHW)...... Direct. 3600

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of crs, 044° Outbnd, 224° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3600'**; over Beaver Int, 2400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 224°—-6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6 miles after passing LOM, climb to 4000' on crs, 224° from LOM within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 4000' on HMV, R 293° to Yuma Int. Caution: Abrupt changes in terrain elevation immediately adjacent to procedure areas. Due high terrain, aircraft with limited climb capability departing on routes via HMV VO RTAC should request clearance to climb on a track of 044° from Boone RBn or 224° from LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs. #Runways 4 and 22 only. ‘ ‘ Descent from 5000' may be made on final after passing HM V VO RTAC, R 348°. % Reduction not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—5200'; 090°-270°—6300'; 270°-360°—5200'. City, Bristol; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev., 1,519'; Fac. Class., LOM (MHW); Ident., TR ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 25 July 64 ,

HMV V O R T A C ______Boone RBn______6000 300-1 300-1 ‘ 200-14 Telford In t...______Boone RBn______3600 800-1 800-114 800-2 Hilton Int______5000 S-dn-4# 600-1 600-1 600-1 Yuma Int______Boone R B n ..______4000 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 Unicoi Int______Int HM V VO R TAC , R 237° and 321° 6000 bearing to Boone RBn. Int HMV VO R TAC, R 237° and 321° bear 3600 ing to Boone RBn. B L A V O R ...... Int HMV VORTAC. R 320° and 220° 6000 bearing to Boone RBn. Int HMV VO RTAC, R 320° and 220° bear Boone R B n ..______*.___ 3600 ing to Boone RBn. LOM...... Boone R B n ...... 3600

Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 224° Outbnd, 044° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2700'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 044°—3.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing Boone RBn, climb to 3600' on crs of 044° from Boone RBn within 15 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 3600' and return direct to Boone RBn. Caution: Abrupt changes In terrain elevations immediately adjacent to procedure areas. Due high terrain, aircraft within limited climb capability departing on routes via HMV VORTAC should request clearance to climb on track of 044° from Boone RBn or 224° from LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs. ‘ Runways 4 and 22 only. § Reduction not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—5400'; 090°-180°—7300'; 180°-270°—5900'; 270°-360°—5200'. City, Bristol; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev., 1519'; Fac. Class., HW; Ident., BON; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 5; Efl. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 20 July 63

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6895

A D F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn*%...... 300-1 300-1 N A C-dn...... 500-1 500-1'A NA S-dn-20______400-1 400-1 N A A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 N A

Procedure turn W side of crs, 019° Outbnd, 199° Inbnd, 6000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 4900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 199°—2.3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.3 miles after passing B YI KBn, left-climbing turn direct to B YI RBn. Climb to 6000' on 019° crs, within 10 miles. *500-1 required for takeoff on Runways 10, 28, and 24. - %Takeofl all runways—Shuttle climb on the R 272° Of the Burley VO R TAC within 20 miles to minimum altitude required for direction of flight. MCA Direction of flight (feet) E, V-4______I____ 5,500 SE, V-101___...... — ..I.'.. 8,000 MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—6800'; 090°-180°—11,400'; 180°-270°—8700'; 270°-360°—6100'. City, Burley; State, Idaho; Airport name, Burley Municipal; Elev., 4,150'; Fac. Class., SBH; Ident., B Y I; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 30 Oct. 65

PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 16 APR. 1966. City, Milwaukee; Stjjte, Wis.; Airport name, General Mitchell Field; Elev., 723'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., GM; Procedure No. 2, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. date, 26 Mar. 66

D T LMM______4200 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-Ji Pilot Rock V H F Int D T LMM______Direct...... 4900 C-dn______500-1 500-1 500-lj^ Gardena VH F Int ______-_____ D T LMM______Direct...... -...... 4200 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Helix VH F Int...... _...... —... D T LMM______Direct...... 4200 T 1 Procedure turn N side of crs, 070° Outbnd, 250° Inbnd, 4200' within 10 miles of LMM. (Final approach from holding pattern at PD LOM not authorized, procedure turn required.) Minimum altitude over PD LOM on final approach crs, 3100'; over D T LMM, 2000'. Crs and distance, PD LOM to airport, 250°—4.1 miles; D T LMM, 250°—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.1 miles after passing PD LOM or 0.6 mile after passing D T LMM, climb to 4000' on crs, 250° Outbnd, 070° Inbnd, within 15 miles of E>T LMM or, when directed by ATC, climb to 4000' direct to P D T VOR, continue climb on R 250° within 15 miles. %Takeoffs all runways: Climb direct to P D T VOR, thence continue climb on R 234°, P D T VO R within 15 miles so as to cross P D T VO R at or above: Southeastbound, V-4—2500'; southeast bound, V-298—2500'; southwestbound, V-281—2500'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-180°—6500'; 180°-270°—4400'; 270°-360°—2800'. City, Pendleton; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Pendleton Municipal; Elev., 1493'; Fac. Class., LMM; Ident., D T; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 6; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 17 July 65

Waco V O R ______Waco L O M ______1800 300-1 300-1 - 200-Jti Int 185° bearing to LOM and A C T 1800 C-dn...... 400-1 500-1 500-1y2 VOR, R 028°. S-dn-18...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 Int 185° bearing to LOM and A C T VOR, Waco LOM (final) . . . ______-______800-2 800-2 800-2 R 028°. 1800 Int 005° bearing to LOM and A C T 2000 ' VOR, R 164°. Int 005° bearing to LOM and A C T VOR, Waco LOM______R 164°. 2000

Procedure turn W side of crs, 005° Outbnd, 185° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1800'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 185°—4.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing LOM, climb to 2700' on 185° crs from LOM within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, (1) turn right, climb to 2000' proceeding to Waco LOM or (2) turn left, climb to 2000' and intercept R 136°, Waco VOR within 20 miles. Other changes: Deletes radar vectoring note. Deletes caution note. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 090°~180°—2700'; 180°-090°—2100'. City, Waco; State, Tex.; Airport name, Waco Municipal; Elev., 515'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., AC; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 4; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 3; Dated, 6 July 63

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 No. 91------2 6896 RULES AND REGULATIONS

2. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.11(c) to read: VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are In statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of theabove type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From—' To— distance-. altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

ADM RBn______A D M V O R T A C ______2300 300-1 300-1 200-14 D U C V O R ______AD M V O R T A C ______... 2600 C -d...... 700-1 700-1 700-l^i C-n...... 700-2 700-2 700-2 " A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 If Autry Int or 7-mile DME Fix received, the following —— minimums apply: C-dn...... 500-1 600-1 600-lJi

Procedure turn 8 side of crs, 225° Outbnd, 045° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'; over Autry Int or 7-mile DME Fix, R 045°, 1500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 045°—8.9 miles; Autry Int to airport, 046°—1.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 8.9 miles after passing AD M VOR, climb to 2700' on AD M VOR, R 045° within 20 miles. City, Ardmore; State, Okla.; Airport name, Ardmore Municipal; Elev., 762'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., ADM; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 3 July 63

OLK VOR Direct...... 2600 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 300-1 FW A V O R ...... Direct______2600 C-dn...... 700-1 700-1 700-1H ______2600 A-dn______NANA N ADirect

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of crs, 196° Outbnd, 016° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of Leo Int. Minimum altitude over Leo Int on final approach crs, 2600'. Crs and distance, Leo Int to airport, 016°—5.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.1 miles after passing Leo Int, make right turn, climb ing to 2600', return to Leo Int, or when authorized by ATC, make left turn climbing 2600', proceed direct to O LK VOR. N otes: (1) When authorized by ATC, DME may be used to position aircraft on final approach crs via the 10-mile DME Arc of FW A VOR at 2600' with the elimination of procedure turn. (2) Obtain altimeter setting from FW A approach control. (3) Dual VOR or VO R and DME required unless Leo Int identified by radar. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2700'; 090°-360°—2200'. City, Auburn; State, Ind.; Airport name, Auburn De Kalb; Elev., 881'; Fac. Class., H -BVO R TAC; Ident., FWA; Procedure No. 1^ Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 30 Jan. 65

IR L VOR EWC V O R ______3000 T -d n ...... 500-1 700-1 N A C -d...... 700-1 700-1 NA C-n...... 700-2 700-2 NA A-dn ...... NANANA

Radar available. , - Procedure turn N side of crs, 073° Outbnd, 253° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 253°—8.4 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 8.4 miles after passing EWC VOR, make right-climb ing turn to 3000'. Return to EWC VOR. Hold M E, 1-minute right turns, 253° Inbnd. N ote: No weather service. N SA within 25 miles of facility: 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-180°—3100'. City, Beaver Falls; State, Pa.; Airport name, Beaver County; Elev., 1252'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., EWC; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 2 May 64

Burley R Bn__ B Y I V O R ...... 6000 T-dn*% ...... 300-1 300-1 NA Hazelton Int__ B Y I V O R (final) . 5300 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1)4 NA View DME Fix BYI VOR..’. 6000 A-dn______800-2 800-2 NA

Procedure turn S side crs, 272° Outbnd, 092° Inbnd, 6000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 5300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 103°—4.3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.3 miles after passing B YI VOR, turn left, climb to 7000' on R 054° within 20 miles. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used within 10 miles at 6000' between R 070° clockwise to R 240° and within 20 miles at 6000' between R 241° clockwise to R 069° to position aircraft’on the final approach crs with the elimination of procedure turn. *500-1 required for takeoff Runways 10, 28, and 24. , %Takeofi all runways: Shuttle climb on the R 272° of the Burley VO R T A C within 20 miles to minimum altitude required for direction of flight. MCA Direction offlight (feet) E, V-4...... 5,500 SE, V-101...... ______----*** 8,000 MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°~090°—6800'; 090°-180°—11,400'; 180°-270°—8700'; 270°-360°—6100'. City, Burley; State, Idaho; Airport name, Burley Municipal; Elev., 4150'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., B Y I; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 7; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 6; Dated, 23 Oct. 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY IT , 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6897

VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— : T o - altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn______300-1 300-1 NA C-dn...... - ____ 400-1 500-1 N A A-dn______800-2 800-2 N A

Procedure turn N side crs, 076° Outbnd, 256° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over, facility on final approach crs, 1500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 256°—5 miles. , .... . _ . „ „ „ T> * , f. , , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing mimmums or if landing not accomplished within 5 miles after passing COT VOR, turn left, climb to 2000' on R 186° within 20 miles. ' , Ca u t io n : 560' unlighted water tower, 0.9 mile WSW, 860' tower, 5.5 miles ESE of airport. Other change: Deletes transition from Cotulla RBn. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2000'; 090°-180°—1700'; 180°-270°—1900'; 270°-360°—2000'. City, Cotulla; State, Tex.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev., 471'; Fac. Class., L-B V O R T A C ; Ident., COT; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 5; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 8 Feb. 64

Sälp.m VOR Y IP VO R ______Direct______2600 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200,-Jj Y IP V O R ______Direct______2500 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-ÌJ-2 S-d-9...... - 500-1 500-1 500-1 S-n-9...... - 500-2 500-2 500-2 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Dual VO R minimums; Dual VOR receivers required: # C-dn#______400-1 500-1 500-lJi S-dn-9#______400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 282° Outbnd, 102° Inbnd, 2500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'; 1139' over French Int. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 102°—7.3 miles. . , „ . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 7.3 miles after passing Y IP VOR, make left-climbmg turn to 2700' and proceed to DW LOM. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2800'; 090°-180°—2400'; 180°-270°—2100'; •270°-360°—2600'. City, Detroit; State, Mich.; Airport name, Detroit Metropolitan-Wayne County; Elev., 639'; Fac. Class., T-V O R; Ident., Y IP ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66.

Direct______1800 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-H Direct______2300 C-dn...... 400-1 500-1 500-1lA Y IP VO R Direct______2300 S-dn-27______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side of crs, 101° Outbnd, 281° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of Taylor Int. Minimum altitude over Taylor Int on final approach crs, 1800'. Crs and distance, Taylor Int to airport, 281°—4 miles...... _ , , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4 miles after passing Taylor Int, climb to 2300 and proceed to Y IP VOR. N ote: Dual VOR equipment or radar identification of Taylor Int required. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2800'; 090°-180°—2400'; 180°-270°—2100'; 270°-360°—2600'. City, Detroit; State, Mich.; Airport name, Detroit Metropolitan-Wayne County; Elev., 639'; Fac. Class., T-VOR; Ident., Y IP ; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66

PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 16 APR. 1966. City, Fayetteville; State, Ark.; Airport name, Drake Field; Elev., 1250'; Fac. Class., BVOR-DM E; Ident., FYV; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 25 Jan. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 5 Oct. 63

F Y V VOR. D A K VO R ______3000 T-dn...... 500-2 500-2 500-2 Decatur Int D A K VO R . ______3000 C-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 Gentry Int: D A K VOR 3000 A-dn...... 1000-2 1000-2 1 0 0 0 -2 Elkins Int.. D A K V O R ______Direct______3000 Lincoln Int. D A K V O R ______Direct______3000

Procedure turn W side of crs, 321° Outbnd, 141° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs; 2200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 141°—2.3 miles. . , . . , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.3 miles after passing D A K VO R , climb to 3000 on R 179° of the D A K VO R within 15 miles. > N ote: Sliding scale not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 090°-180°—3500'; 180°-090°—3100'. City, Fayetteville; State, Ark.; Airport name, Fayetteville Municipal (Drake Field); Elev., 1250'; Fac. Class., T-B VO R ; Ident., DAK; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 5 Feb. 66

North Plains VH F Int U B G VO R ...... 3000 T-dn...... 600-1 500-1 500-1 UBGVOR ...... 3000 C-d...... 1000-1 1000-1 1000-lÿf U B G V O R ...... 3000 C-n...... 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 U B G V O R ...... —...... Direct...... 3500 A-dn*______NA NA NA

Procedure turn W side of crs, 166° Outbnd, 346° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles. Final approach from holding pattern at U B G VOR not authorized, procedure turn required. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 346°—11.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6 miles after passing U B G VOR, turn right to crs, 110° to intercept U B G VOR, R 014° thence direct to U B G VO R climbing to 2700'. Operations from 6 miles to airport must be conducted in accordance with visual flight rules: Caution: VO R reception not available over the airport below 700'. *No public weather service. Air carrier Use not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-180°—3100'; 180°-270°—4500'; 270°-360°—4600'. City, Hillsboro; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland-Hillsboro; Elev., 204'; Fac. Class., H -BVO R TAC ; Ident., U B G ; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 25 Sept. 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6898 RULES AND REGULATIONS

VOR Standard in str u m e n t A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-enginè, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn______300-1 300-1 NA C-dn...... : __ 700-1 700-1 N A S-dn-18______700-1 700-1 NA A-dn...... NANANA

Procedure turn W side of crs, 351° Outbnd, 171° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 171°—1 miles. ,, ...... „ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing mimmums or if landing not accomplished within 4 miles after passing F Y V V O R , turn left, climbing to 3000', return to F Y V VOR. N ote: N o weather reporting service available. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 090°-180°—3500'; 180°-090°—3000 . Citv Springdale; State, Ark ; Airport name,.Springdale Municipal; Elev., 1352'; Fac. Class., H -BVO R TAC ; Ident., FYV; Procedure No. I, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; ! Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 27 July 63

A C T VO R ______Direct______2000 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-J4 A C T VO R (final) Direct______1400 C-dn...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-14______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn W side of crs, 321° Outbnd, 141° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. * Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 141°—3 miles...... „ ,, . __ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3 miles after passing A C T VOR, climb to 2000' on R 136° within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 2000' on R 187° within 20 miles, or turn right, climb to 2000' and return to A C T VOR. N ote: When authorized by AT C , DME may be used to orbit W of the R 187° and R 028° at 8 miles from the VOR at 2000' for a final approach with the elimination of a procedure turn. . MSA within 25 miles of facility: 090°-180°—2700 ; 180°-090 —2100 . City Waco- State, Tex.; Airport name, Waco Municipal; Elev., 515'; Fac. Class., BVO RTAC; Ident., ACT; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 9; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66, Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 19 Feb. 66

T-dn______300-1 300-1 N A C-d...... -...... 1000-1 1000-1 NA C-n...... 1000-2 1000-2 N A S-dn...... NA NA NA A-dn*...... NA NANA

Procedure turn S side of crs, 080° Outbnd, 260° Inbnd, 1900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'. ^visual contac^noTestablishecPupon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, within 10.2 miles after passing MEM VO RTAC, make right turn, climb to 1800' on R 272°, proceed direct Edmondson Int, and hold W, R 272°, 092° Inbnd, right turns, 1-minute pattern. - ...... N otes- (1) Altimeter setting remoted from Memphis Metropolitan Airport. (2) Runways 18-36 unlighted. (3) Aircraft will cancel IF R with MEM APC prior to landing or upon reaching V F R conditions. (4) Aircraft will not take off under IF R conditions without prior A T C approval. •Nearest weather observation at Memphis Metropolitan Airport. > __ __ MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2400'; 090°-180°—1700'; 180°-270°—1600 ; 270 -360 —1800 . City, Walls; State, Miss.; Airport name, Twinkle Town; Elev., 210'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., MEM; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66 3. By amending the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read:

T erm inal VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. _... ,,,,,,,, , .__ _ , If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, nnlftss an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. M inimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn*...... 300-1 300-1 200-J4 C-dn...... 700-1 700-1 700-1)4 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 After passing the 6-mile Rad: r Fix, Inbn I on crs, the following-minirsums are au horized: C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-1...... 500-1 500-1 500-1

Radar available. „ ...... Procedure turn E side of crs, 195° Outbnd, 015° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 988'; after passing 6-mile Radar Fix, 788. Facility on airport. Crs and distance, breakoff point to runway, 011°—0.5 mile. , , . T o d ivm' i» R»™!, If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished when over ALB VOR, climb to 3000' on R 026 to Bemis Int. Hold N of Bemis Int, 1-minute, right turns, 206° Inbnd. ** _ N ote: Final approach from a holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. *300-1 required for takeoffs On Runways 10, 28,15, and 33. . . , ____ „ MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3000 ; 090°-180°■—4000'; 180 -270 •—3500'; 270 -360 —3500'. City, Albany; State, N.Y.; Airport name, Albany County; Elev., 288'; Fac. Class., BV O RTA C; Ident., A LB ; Procedure No. TerVOR-1, Amdt. 9; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66, Sup. Amdt. No. 8; Dated, 19 Mar. 66

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 RULES AND RÉGULATIONS 6899

T erm inal VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pprôach P rocedure—-Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn...... I 300-1 i 300-1 200-H Minimums when control zone effective: C-d#...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 C-n#__...... 500-1)4 500-1)4 500-1)4 S-dn#______500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn# ______800-2 800-2 800-2 Minimums when control zone not effective: C -d ...... 900-1 900-1 900-1)4 C -n „_...... 900-1)4 900-1)4 900-1)4 S-dn...... 900-1 900-1 900-1 A-dn...... NANANA

Procedure turn W side of ers, 313° Outhnd, 133° Inbnd, 2900' within 10 miles.. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach ers, 2350'. ifvisual œntactnot established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile of VOR, climb to 2900' on R 133° within 10 miles, return to D V L V O R , hold NW on R 313°. N ote: Obtain Grand Forks altimeter setting when control zone not effective. Ca u tio n ; Runways 3-21, 8-26 unlighted. #These minimums apply at all times for those air carriers with approved weather reporting services. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—3100'. City, Devils Lake: State, N. Dak.; Airport name, Devils Lake Municipal; Elev., 1450'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., DVL; Procedure No. TerVOR-13, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 3 Mar, 66

M YV V O R ...... Direct...... 2500 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-)4 MYV VOR .... ______2500 C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)4 M YV V O R ...... Direct...... 2500 S-dn-14...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 Chico VOR Direct..—______2500 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Direct...... 700 If Sullivan Int received, the following minimums apply: S-dn-14______500-1 500-1 500-1 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of crs, 325° Outbnd, 145° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum, altitude over Sullivan Int on final approach ers, 700'. Facility on airport. Crs and distance, Sullivan Int to VOR, 145°—5.8 miles. Breakoff point to runway, 139°—0.4 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing M YV VOR, turn right, climb to 2000' on M YV VOR, R 325° within 15 miles. %Takeofls all runways: Westbound to Yuba Int, climb on M YV, R 135° or MYV, R 325° within 10 miles to cross VOR at or above 1500', then continue climb on MYV, R 262°, MCA V23, 3000' north westbound. On crs climb authorized direct Chico VO R and direct Grimes Int. _ MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4000'; 090°-180°—2700'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—3500'. City, Marysville; State, Calif.; Airport name, Yuba County; Elev., 63'; Fac. Class., T-B VO R ; Ident., M YV; Procedure No. VOR-I4, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 14 Aug. 65

Williams VO R M Y V VOR ______2500 T-dn% ______300-1 300-1 200-^ Grimes Int___. M YV V O R ______2500 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1»^ Yuba In t.___ M YV V O R ______2500 S-dn-32...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 If Plumas Int received. the following minimums apply: C-dn...... I 400-1 I 400-1 | 400-1)4 S-dn-32...... 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of crs, 135° Outbnd, 315° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over Plumas Int on final approach crs, 600'. Facility on airport. Crs and distance, Plumas Int to VOR, 315°—4 miles. Breakoff point to runway, 319°—0.4 mile. I f visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing M YV VOR, climb to 2000' on M YV VOR, R 325° within 15 miles. %Takeoffs all runways: Westbound to Yuba Int, climb on MYV, R 135° or M YV, R 325° within 10 miles to cross VO R at or above 1500', then continue climb on MYV, R 262°, MCA V23, 3000' northwestbound. On crs climb authorized direct Chico VO R and direct Grimes Int. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4000'; 090°-180°—2700'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—3500'. City, Marysville; State, Calif.; Airport name, Yuba County; Elev., 63'; Fac. Class., T-B VO R : Ident., M YV; Procedure No. VOR-32, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup- Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 14 Aug. 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11 1966 6900 RULES AND REGULATIONS

T erm inal VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

]W77, v g r MIE V O R ...... - Direct.______—. 2400 Minimums when control zone effective: MIE V O R ...... -...... Direct...... 2400 T -dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn______500-1 500-1 500-1Vá S-dn-14...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 VOR/ADF minimums, VOR and A D F receivers required: C-dn...... 1 400-1 500-1 1 500-1H S-dn-14...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 Minimums when control zone not effective: T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-l¡Hs S-dn-14______600-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn**______NANA NA VOR/ADF minimums, VO R and A D F receivers required: C-dn...... I 500-1 500-1 1 m - i n S-dn...... 500-1 500-1 600-1

Radar available. .... Procedure turn W side of crs, 320° Outbnd, 140° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over Gaston Int on final approach crs, 1437' (*1537' when control zone not effective). Crs and distance, Gaston Int to airport, 140°—4 miles. ... _...... „ .. , „ .... „ .... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile of MIE VOR, climb to 2500' on MIE, R 140° within 10 miles, make left turn and return to MIE VOR. N ote: When control zone not in effect, obtain altimeter setting from Indianapolis FSS. Caution: Unlighted, 106' (1043') powerline, one-half mile northwest Runway 14.. “ Alternate minimums authorized only when control zone in effect or for air carrier with approved weather service. MSA within 25 miles of facility: Q00°-360°—2500'. Citv. Muncie; State, Ind.; Airport name, Delaware County-Johnson Field; Elev., 037'; Fac. Class., L-BV O R; Ident., MIE; Procedure No. TerVOR-14, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 19 Mar. 66 4. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange— distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures' prescribed in § 97.15 to read: VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSB* Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miiAR unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. , ...... , ,, . , , ■ . , . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following Instrument approach procedure, unless an approach Is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and altitude Condition From— T o - distance more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots

PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 16 APR. 1966. City Ardmore; State, Okla.; Airport name, Ardmore Municipal; Elev., 762'; Fac. Class., L-B V O R T A C ; Ident., ADM; Procedure No. VOR-DM E, No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; " ’ Eff. date, 25 Dec. 65

North Plains Int/ll-mile DME Fix, R 334°. TIB G VO R ______3000 T-dn______500-1 500-1 500-1 Oswego Int/ll-mile DME Fix, R 048°_____ . TIR G V O R 3000 C-d...... 1000-1 1000-1 1000-1Và Aurora Int/10-mile DME Fix, R 111°------U B G VO R 3000 C-n...... 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 10-mile DME Fix, R 183°.....______2700 A-dn*...... NA NANA 5-mile DME Fix, R 183°....— ------.... U B G VO R (final) 2400 Gladstone Int/17-mile DME Fix, R 085°— Ù B G v o r .:___ ...... Direct...... 3500

Procedure turn W side of crs, 166° Outbnd, 346® Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles. - Final approach from holding pattern at UB G VO R not authorized, procedure turn required. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 346°—11.1 miles. ./ .... „ . _ ...... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6 miles after passmg U B G VOR, or at the 6-mile DME Fix,R 346°, turn right to crs, 110° to intercept U B G VOR, R 014° thence direct to UB G VO R climbing to 2700'. Operations from 6 miles to airport must be conducted in accordance with visual flight rules. Caution: VO R reception not available over airport below 700'. *No public weather service. Air carrier use not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-180°—3100'; 180°-270°—4500'; 270°-360°—4600'. City, Hillsboro; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland-Hillsboro; Elev., 204'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R TA C ; Ident., U BG ; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 25 Sept. 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6901

VO B Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Celling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and 2-engine, distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

m ia v o n ...... 5-mile DME or Radar Fix on R 108® Direct___ 1000 T -d n - _____ 300-1 300-1 200- % or Alligator VHF/LF Int (final). C-d...... 1000-1 1000-1 ioeo-i% C-n...... 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 A-dn______NA NANA If 5-mile DM E or Radar Fix on R 108° or Alligator VHF/LF Int received, the following minimums are authorized: C-dn______500-1 500-1 600-1% S-dn-9L#...... 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar available. Procedure turn N side of crs, 316° Outbnd. 136° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1500'; at 5-mile DME or Radar Fix on R 108® or Alligator VHF/LF Int, 1000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 108°-—9.8 miles; 5-mile DME or Radar Fix on R 108° or Alligator VHF/LF Int to airport, 108°—4.8 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.8 miles after passing 5-mile DME or Radar Fix on R 108° or Alligator VHF/LF Int, or 9.8 miles after passing MIA VO R, climb to 1500' on R 108® within 20 miles. N ote:. This approach authorized during Opa Locka tower horns of operation. #400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—1500'; 180°-270°—1700'; 27p°-360°—1200'. City, Miami; State, Fla.; Airport name, Opa Locka; Elev., 9'; Fac. Class., H -V O R T A C ; Ident., MIA; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. 5; Eft. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 15 Aug. 64

Gardena Int______P D T V O R ...... 3500 T-dn% 300-1 300-1 200- % P D T V O R 4900 C-dn 600-1 600-1 600-1% Echo Int______. ______P D T V O R 3500 S-dn-7# . 400-1 400-1 400-1 Cold Springs Int______P D T V O R 3500 800-2 800-2 800-2 Mission Int.______P D T VOR. 3500

Procedure turn N side of crs, 253° Outbnd, 073° Inbnd, 3500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 073°—3.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or iflanding not accomplished within 3.6 miles after passing P D T VOR, make left-climbing turn direct to P D T VOR, continue climb to 4000' on R 253° within 10 miles of PD T VOR. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used within 8 miles at 3500' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of the procedure turn. #400-% authorized, except for Engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. %Takeofls all runways: Unless otherwise directed by ATC, the following departure procedure is recommended to insure adequate terrain and obstruction clearance: Climb direct to P D T VO R TAC, thence continue climb on R 234°, P D T VO R TA C within 15miles so as to cross P D T VO R T A C at or above: Southeastbound, V-4—2500'; South- eastbound, V-298—2500'; Uouthwestbound, V-281—2500'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-Q90°—5100'; 090°-180°—6400'; 180°-270°—5100';270°-360°—2800'. City, Pendleton; State, Orig.; Airport name, Pendleton Municipal; Elev., 1493'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., P D T ; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eft. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 7; Dated, 5 Feb. 66 5. By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read:

IL S Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be In accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— T o - Course and 2-engine, distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Holston Mountains V O R T A C ...... Int BLA, R 200° and 310® bearing to 6000 T-dn_„___ 300-1 300-1 •* 200-% LOM. C -d n „„._. 800-1 800-1% 800-2 Int B LA , R 200° and 310° bearing to LOM . LOM (MHW)...... 3600 S-dn-22#%. 400-% 400-% 400-% Telford Int______LOM (M H W )...... 3600 A-dn_____ 800-2 800-2 800-2 Yuma Int______LOM (MHW)...... 4000 Hilton Int______LOM (MHW)...... 5000 OTeendale Int______:______5000 Damascus Int______Int HMV, R 008° and 271° bearing to 6000 LOM. Int HMV, R 008° and 271° bearing to LOM__ LOM iMHWl______3600 B O N RBn______LOM (MHW)...... Direct______3600

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of crs, 044° Outbnd, 224° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 3600'.## Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 3462'—6 miles; at MM, 1742'—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6 miles after passing LOM, climb to 4000' on crs 224® from LOM within 20 miles or, when directed by AT C , turn right, climb to 4000' on HMV, R 293° to Yuma Int. _T^ C autio n: Abrupt changes in terrain elevations adjacent to procedure areas NW. Due high terrain, aircraft with limited climb capability departing on routes via HMV V O R T A C should request clearance to climb on a track of 044° from Boone RBn or 224° from LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs. ** Runways 4 and 22 only. %600-1 required when glide slope not utilized and aircraft must maintain 2400' or above until passing Beaver Int. 400-1 required when approach lights inoperative. #Reduction not authorized. ##Descent from 5000' may be made on glide slope or SW of HMV VO R TA C , R 348° on final. City, Bristol; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev., 1519'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-T R I; Procedure No. ILS-22, Amdt. 9; Eff. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 8: Dated, 25 July 64

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6902 RULES AND REGULATIONS

IL S Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and altitude Condition From— To— distance more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots

Madeira RBn (final) Direct. 2700 T-dn#— . 600-1 600-1 600-1 Mason Int— 2700 C-dn_____ 800-1 800-1 800-1H Hamilton Int..-. Madeira RBn______Direct. Direct. 2700 S-dn-20L* 400-1 400-1 400-1 Alexandria Int. Madeira RBn______800-2 Madeira R B n._____ Direct. 2700 A-dn_____ 800-2 800-2 CVG V O R — . 2700 Scott DMK Int. Madeira RBn...... Direct.

P ro cu retu rn S side of crs, 021° Outbnd, 201° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of Madeira RBn. Crs and distance, Madeira RBn to airport, 201°—7.2 miles. Minimum altitude at elide slope interception Inbnd, 2700'. _ . . ..

California Int on 201° heading to Intercept CVG, R 105°. Proceed to California Int. Hold E. 1-minute left turns, 285 Inbnd. *500-1 required with glide slope inoperative—visibility reduction below % mile not authorized. #300-1 takeoff authorized Runways 2R and 6, 400-1 takeoff authorized Runways 20L and 24. City Cincinnati; State, Ohio; Airport name, Cincinnati Municipal-Lunken Field; Elev., 488'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-L U K ; Procedure No. ILS-20L, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. •" date, 16 Apr. 66

Direct______2400 T-dn*...... 300-1 300-1 200-Ji Des Moines VO R. 2500 C-dn______400-1 500-1 600-1H Ankeny In t..___ T,OM ______— Direct______2500 8-dn-30**#...... 300-H 300-Ji 300-Y i Grimes Int---- .... 2500 A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 Elkhart Int...... 2400 Mine In t..______y,01\l ( f i n a l ) ______Direct______Direct______2400 Beech Int______Direct______2500 TNUVOR ...... 2400 Swan Int______Mine Int______Direct______

P ro ^ m e turnE side of crs, 125° Outbnd, 305° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2400'. ___ __ .

C a u t i o n : 1546'tower, 3.2 miles N N E of airport. . **400-1 required when glide slope not utilized, reduction not authorized. *When 1546' tower not visible on takeoff NW or NE , climb to 2100' prior to turning toward tower. #300' required. R VR 4000' authorized in lieu of %-mile visibility. Reduction not authorized. City, Des Moines; State, Iowa; Airport name, Des Moines Municipal; Elev., 957'; Fac. Class., IDS; Ident., I-DSM; Procedure No. ILS-30, Arndt. 8; Efi. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 26 Mar. 66

2400 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-H F I L F R ...... 2400 C-dn*...... 400-1 500-1 600-1H A I LMM...... Direct______2600 S-dn-1#--...... - 400-1 400-1 400-1 F A I V O R ...... 1500 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Wood Int______2600 E N N VO R TAC Wood Int______- Direct......

Procedure turn E side of crs, 190° Outbnd, 010° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of Cache Int. No glide slope, outer marker, or middle marker. Minimum altitude over Cache Int, 1500'; oyer Ester Int, 1000 . i K r t S S S S t o toaiSSSiV IrnSfi not accomplished within 1.8 miles after passing Ester Int, torn right, climb.to 2400' proceeding direct to FI LFR , then on E crs (060°) to Chena Int. ,, . .

City, Fairbanks; State, Alaska; Aftport name, Fairbanks I h M M o n m y g ^ W ; ^ P" >Ced“ e N °' “

PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 16 APR. 1966.

300-1 300-1 200-H LOM ...... Direct...... 1400 T-dn______C-dn______400-1 500-1 500-1H S-dn-4...... 200-H 200-Ji m-y2 A-dn...... — 600-2 600-2 600-2

Procedure turn S side of crs, 219° Outbnd, 039° Inbnd, 1400' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1200'. S K & S k « nail * . 2 after passing LO U , climb to 1600' on N E

“ N otS' oS fn S DME Arc n r authorised radially OUT- clockwise through 292« irom the Monroe V O R to Intercept dual approach crs eliminating procedure turn. (2) Missed approach decision height, 320' due glide slope restriction. City, Monroe; State, La.; Airport name, Monroe Municipal; Elev., 79'; Fac. C la a ^ L S j Ment^I-M LU; Procedure No. ILS-4, Arndt. 6; Eft. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 5;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6903

IL S Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and Condition From— To— distance altitude more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots

LOM...... Direct______4600 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-M LOM...... Direct.. ... ___ 4900 C-dn__.... 500-1 600-1 tm -V/6 LOM ...... —...... Direct______4600 S-dn-25B*^ 200-^ 200-H 200-H LOM...... Direct______4600 A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 t t a ü y V H F Int LOM ...... r Direct______4600

Procedure turn N side of crs, 070° Outbnd, 250° Inbnd, 4600' within 10 miles. (Final approach from holding pattern at PD LOM not authorized, procedure turn required.) Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 3700'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 27S0—4.1 miles; at MM, 1725—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.1 miles after passing LOM, climb to 4000' direct to P D T VOR, continue climb on R 230° within IS miles or, when directed by ATG, climb to 4000' pn crs, 250° Outbnd, 070° Inbnd, within 15 miles of D T LMM. %Takeoffs all runways: Unless otherwise directed by ATC, the following departure procedure is recommended to insure adequate terrain and obstruction clearance: Climb direct to PD T VOR, thence continue climb on R 234°, P D T VO R within 15 miles so as to cross P D T VO R at or above: Southeastbound, V-4—2500'; southeastbound, V-298— 2500'; southwestbound, V-281—2500'. •Procedure not authorized with glide slope inoperative. City, Pendleton; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Pendleton Municipal; Elev., 1493'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-P D T ; Procedure No. ILS-25R, Arndt. 10; Efl. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 9; Dated, 4 Dec. 65

Bostonia Int___ 3700 T-dn#...... 300-1 300-1 200-H Sweetwater Int. 1600 f!-dn 800-2 800-2 800-2 A-dn___<______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar available. Procedure turn not authorized. Final approach crs Inbnd, 272°. Minimum altitude over Encanto Int on final approach crs, 1600'. Crs and distance, Encanto Int to airport, 272°—4.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.9 miles after passing Encanto Int, turn right, climb to 2500' on SAN VOR, R 324° to Mount Dad Int, or when directed by AT C , climb to 1500' on localizer crs to Sargo Int. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used at 13 miles from SAN VO R at 3700' from SAN, R 076° clockwise to R 103°/localizer back crs to position aircraft on localizer back crs for a straight-in approach. Caution: Buildings and terrain, 469°—0.5 mile E of airport. #500-1 required for takeofi Runway 9. City, San Diego; State, Calif.; Airport name, San Diego Intemational-Lindberg Field; Elev., 15'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-SA N ; Procedure No. ILS-27 (back crs), Arndt. 5: Efl. date, 16 Apr. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 10 OCt. 64 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. (Secs. 307(c), 313(a), 601, Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775)

Issued in Washington, D.C., on March 11, 1966. G o r d o n A. W il l ia m s , Jr., Acting Director, Flight Standards Service. IF.R. Doc. 66-5149; Piled, May 10, 1966; 8:49 ajn.J

(R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; (R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218)

U n it e d S tates C i v il S er v U n it e d S tates C iv il S er v PERSONNEL ic e C o m m is s io n , ic e C o m m is s io n , [ s e a l ] M a r y V . W e n z e l , [ s e a l ] M a r y V . W e n z e l , Chapter I— Civil Service Commission Executive Assistant to Executive Assistant to the Commissioners. the Commissioners. PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE [F.R. Doc. 66-5145; Filed, May 10, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-5146; Filed, May 10, 1966; 8:49 am .] 8:49 a.m.] Department of Health, Education, and Welfare PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE Section 213.3316 is amended to show Department of Health, Education, and General Accounting Office that the position of Deputy Assistant Welfare Section 213.3323 is revoked to reflect Secretary for International Affairs is Section 213.3316 is amended to show the fact that the three positions formerly excepted under Schedule C. Effective that an additional position of Confiden included thereunder are no longer ex on publication in the F ederal R eg ister , tial Assistant to the Assistant Secretary cepted imder Schedule C. Effective on subparagraph (5) is added to paragraph for Education is excepted under Sched publication in the F ederal R e g ist e r , (h) of § 213.3316 as set out below. ule C. Effective upon publication in the § 213.3323 is revoked in its entirety. F ederal R eg ist e r , subparagraph (1) of (R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; § 213.3316 Department of Health, Ed paragraph (j) of § 213.3316 is amended as set out below. 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, ucation, and Welfare. 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) § 213.3316 Department of Health, Ed ***** ucation, and Welfare. U n it e d S tates C iv il S er v (h) Office of the Assistant Secretary ***** ic e C o m m is s io n , [ s e a l ] M a r y V . W e n z e l , for Health and Scientific Affairs. * * * (j) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Education. (1) Two Confidential Executive Assistant to (5) One Deputy Assistant Secretary the Commissioners. for International Activities. Assistants to the Assistant Secretary for Education. [F.R. Doc. 66-5144; Filed May 10, 1966; * * * • « * * * * * 8:49 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY I f , 1966 No. 91------3 6904 RULES AND REGULATIONS

White, Great Northern, Small White, storage placed under warehouse storage Title 7— AGRICULTURE Flat Small White, Pink, Small Red, Pinto, loan, or delivered in satisfaction of a Dark Red Kidney, Light Red Kidney, farm storage loan or for purchase must Chapter XIV— Commodity Credit Cor Western Red Kidney, Large Lima, and meet the requirements of this section poration, Department of Agriculture Baby Lima. and the General Regulations Governing (2) Contamination and poisonous subPrice Support for 1964 and Subsequent SUBCHAPTER B— LOANS, PURCHASES, AND stances. The beans must not be con Crops as amended or revised. OTHER OPERATIONS taminated by rodents, birds, insects, or (b) Grade and class. A separate ware [CCC Grain Price Support Regs., 1966 and other vermin or contain mercurial com house receipt must be submitted for each Subsequent Crops Dry Edible Bean Supp.] pounds or other substances poisonous to grade and class of beans. PART 1421— GRAINS AND SIMILARLY man or animals. (c) Entries. Each warehouse receipt, (b) Warehouse stored. To be eligibleor supplemental certificate properly iden HANDLED COMMODITIES as security for a warehouse storage loan, tified with the warehouse receipt, must Subpart— 1966 and Subsequent Crops the beans must also be (1) stored in an show (1) net weight, (2) class, (3) grade, (4) whether the beans will be packaged Dry Edible Bean Loan and Purchase approved warehouse, and (2) represented by warehouse receipts (or warehouse re in jute or paper bags on delivery, and Program ceipts and supplemental certificates) for (5) in the case of “identity preserved” The General Regulations Governing beans grading No. 2 or better and con beans, the warehouse receipt shall show Price Support for the 1964 and Subse taining not more than 18 percent the lot number, and must be accom quent Crops (Revision 1) (31 F.R. 5941) moisture. panied by a supplemental certificate executed by the producer in which he issued by the Commodity Credit Corpo § 1421.2463 Determination of quality. ration which contain regulations of a assumes responsibility for any loss in the general nature with respect to price (a) Quality. The class, grade, and all quantity or quality of beans shown support operations are supplemented for other quality factors shall be in accord thereon to the extent provided in the the 1966 and subsequent crops of dry ance with the Official U.S. Standards for program regulations. When beans stored edible beans as follows: Beans, whether or not such determina on a commingled basis have not been tions are made on the basis of an official processed prior to issuance of the ware Sec inspection. house receipt, the warehouse receipt or 1421.2460 Purpose. the supplemental certificate must also 1421.2461 AvaUability. (b) Warehouse storage. If the beans 1421.2462 Eligible beans. are stored in an approved warehouse, show the gross weight, moisture, and 1421.2463 Determination of quality. loans will be made on the class, grade, percentage of total defects of the beans 1421.2464 Determination of quantity for and quality of beans specified on the received and the quantity and quality loans. warehouse receipt, or supplemental cer which the warehouseman guarantees to 1421.2465 Warehouse receipts. deliver. 1421.2466 Warehouse charges and packaging. tificate, if applicable, representing such 1421.2467 Fees and charges. beans. § 1421.2466 Warehouse charges and 1421.2468 Maturity of loans. §'1421.2464 Determination of quantity packaging. _ 1421.2469 Inspection certificates. for loans. 1421.2470 Settlement. (a) Warehouse charges. Prior to the ’ 1421.2471 Storage in-transit. (a) In warehouse— (1) Commingled. time that the beans are placed under 1421.2472 Support rates. The amount of a loan on eligible beans warehouse-storage loans, or acquired by A u t h o r it y : The provisions of this subpart stored commingled in an approved ware CCC, the producer shall arrange for pay issued under sec. 4, 62 Stat. 1070, as amended; house shall be based on the net weight ment of storage, bagging, processing, 15 U.S.C. 714b. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 62 specified on the warehouse receipt or on inspection, and all other charges (except Stat. 1072, secs. 301, 401, 63 Stat. 1053, 15 the supplemental certificate, if applica^- receiving and loading out charges in the U.S.C. 714c, 7 U.S.C. 1421, 1441. ble, representing such beans. warehouse in which the beans are § 1421.2460 Purpose. (2) Identity preserved. The amount acquired by CCC) accruing through the of a loan on a quantity of eligible beans maturity date for loans. Such charges T his supplement contains program stored identity preserved in an approved shall include the cost of movement to a provisions which, together with the an warehouse shall be based on a percent normal railroad shipping point if the nual dry edible bean crop year supple age, as determined by the State com warehouse is not located on a railroad, ment, and the provisions of the General mittee, of the net weight specified on the and any unpiling, turning, repiling, or Regulations Governing Price Support for warehouse receipt or on the supplemental other charges, except loading out charges the 1964 and Subsequent Crops (Revi certificate, if applicable, representing incident to official weight and grade sion 1) and any amendments thereto or such beans. Such percentage shall not determinations on identity-preserved revisions thereof, and the Cooperative exceed 95 percent of the net weight so beans. CCC will assume warehouse stor Marketing Association Eligibility Re specified. The State committee’s de age charges in accordance with the Bean quirements for Price Support in Part termination shall be made on a State Storage Agreement accruing after the 1425 of this chapter and any amend-, wide basis or for specified areas within maturity date for loans for beans ac ments thereto or revisions thereof, apply the State. The county committee may quired by CCC. to loans and purchases for the 1966 and lower such percentage on an individual (b) Packaging. The producer must subsequent crops of dry edible beans. basis when determined by it to be in the arrange for the beans to be packaged 100 § 1421.2461 Availability. best interest of CCC. pounds net weight in new jute or multi wall paper bags prior to their delivery Producers desiring price support for (b) On farm. Amount of a loan on a to CCC. Bags mjist be marked to show dry edible beans must obtain their loans quantity of beans stored in approved or notify the ASCS County Office of in farm storage shall be determined in ac the commodity name and class, the net tentions to sell to CCC no later than the cordance with § 1421.67 on the basis of a weight, and the name and address of the packer. The bags in which the beans dates set forth in the applicable annual percentage of the estimated net weight are packed must meet the specifications crop-year supplement to the regulations of the beans so stored, or, if the beans of subparagraph (1) or (2) of this contained in this part. have not been processed, on the basis of a percentage of the estimated net weight paragraph: § 1421.2462 Eligible beans. of the sound beans so stored as deter / (1) Jute bags. The bags must be made (a) General. To be eligible for pricemined by an inspection by a representa of 36 inch, extra quality 10.4 ounce or support, the beans must be merchantable tive of the pounty committee. Such heavier jute. Bag seams must be as for use as food or feed or for other use, quantity shall be expressed in whole units strong as the full strength of the cloth, as determined by CCC, and must meet of 100 pounds. (2) Multiwallpaper bags. Paper bags must meet the requirements of Federal the additional requirements of this § 1421.2465 Warehouse receipts. section. Specification UU-S-48 as supplemented. (1) Classes. The beans must be dry (a) General. Warehouse receipts repThe walls shall be either Class A Heavy edible beans of the classes Pea, Medium resenting beans in approved warehouse Duty Shipping Sack Kraft or Class F

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— -WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966

X RULES AND REGULATIONS 6905

Heavy Duty Extensible Shipping Sack quantity determined by multiplying the the $100 million Development Investment Kraft Papers. The bag shall be open- number of bags by 100 pounds, which Issue of State of Israel Bonds, March 30, mouth style constructed of four walls of ever is smaller. The inspection and 1966, are investment securities eligible either 2/50# and 2/60# 220 pounds total weight certificates specified above in this for purchase by national banks pursuant basis weight Class A paper or 4/50# 200 program must be dated not earlier than to paragraph Seventh of 12 U.S.C. 24. pounds total basis weight Class P paper. 30 days prior to the applicable maturity (h) Opinion. The Development In The outer wall shall be treated (mechan date for beans and shall be furnished vestment issue is similar to the Third ically or chemically) for antiskid prop the county committee at the time of issue, which was the subject of our ruling erties. The bottom and top of the bag delivery. of May 27, 1964, 12 CFR 1.139, except shall be closed by sewing through all § 1421.2471 Storage in-transit. that the State of Israel is offering the walls with 12/6 needle and 12/5 cotton present bonds only to banks, insurance Reimbursement will be made by CCC looper thread, or with a single thread companies, labor unions, and employee to producers or warehousemen for paid- chain stitch, Type 101, with a 12/6 cotton benefit funds and that, under certain in freight on beans stored in approved thread (other threads of equivalent conditions, the State of Israel has under warehouses, subject to the following taken to purchase with U.S. currency strength are permitted). Stitches shall conditions: be spaced 3.0 to 3.6 to the inch. The (a) The movement from point of any bond held by the original owner. manufactured end of the bag shall be origin to storage point must be an “in Our rulings of February 6, 1964, and May 27, 1964, on the eligibility of the sewn at a depth of not less than three- line” movement as determined by CCC, eighths inch nor more than three- and must be no greater than 100 miles Second and Third issues, 12 CFR 1.133 fourths inch and shall incorporate a from the point of production unless and 1.139, respectively, will also be appli 2Ya-inch minimum width 70-pound otherwise approved by CCC prior to the cable to the Development Investment nominal basis weight, flat, creped, or ex date of shipment. issue. tensible kraft paper. After filling, the (b) The freight must have been paid (c) Ruling. It is our conclusion that top of the bag shall be machine sewn at by the person claiming reimbursement the $100 million Development Invest a depth of not less than three-eighths and he must not have been otherwise ment Issue of State of Israel Bonds, inch. reimbursed. March 30,1966, are investment securities as defined in § 1.3(b) of the Investment § 1421.2467 Fees and charges. (c) The warehousemen must furnish the descriptive data on all freight bills Securities Regulation (12 CFR 1.3(b)) is The producer shall pay a loan service or transit tonnage slips on all eligible sued pursuant to paragraph Seventh of fee and delivery charge as specified in beans received into the storage facility 12 U.S.C. 24 and are eligible for pur § 1421.60(b). at the time and in the manner stipulated chase by national banks, subject to the 5-percent limitation of § 1.6 (b) and (c) § 1421.2468 Maturity o f loans. in the Bean Storage Agreement. (d) The freight bills or transit ton of the Investment Securities Regulation Loans will mature on demand but not nage slips must be made available to (12 CFR 1.6 (b) and (c )). later than the date specified in the an CCC in accordance with the provisions Dated; May 9,1966. nual crop year supplement to the regu of the Bean Storage Agreement. lations in this part. (e) Not more than one transit stop [ seal] James J. S axon, § 1421.2469 Inspection certificates. must have been used on billing. Comptroller of the Currency. (f) The freight bills must be other [F-R. Doc. 66-5203; Filed, May 10, 1966; Except in the case of loans on beans wise acceptable to CCC under the terms 10:36 am .] stored commingled in an approved ware of the Bean Storage Agreement. house, settlement with the producer on (g) Reimbursement for paid-in freight all beans acquired by CCC will be based under this section will be made by the Chapter V— Federal Home Loan Bank on the class, grade, and quality shown ASCS commodity office subsequent to Board on Federal or Federal-State lot inspec actual acquisition of the beans by CCC. tion certificates. Such inspection certif SUBCHAPTER B— FEDERAL HOME LOAN icates shall be dated not earlier than 30 § 1421.2472 Support rates. BANK SYSTEM days prior to the applicable maturity The support rates and the schedule of [No. 19,872] date for beans. The cost of Federal or premiums and discounts for use in mak Federal-State lot inspections as required ing loans and for use in settling loans PART 522— ORGANIZATION OF by this section and § 1421.2470 shall not and for purchases shall be set forth in THE BANKS be for the account of CCC. the annual crop year supplement to the regulations in this part. PART 524— OPERATIONS OF § 1421.2470 Settlement. THE BANKS Effective upon publication in the F ed Settlement for eligible beans acquired eral R egister. Compensation and Budgets by CCC under loan or by purchase will Signed at Washington, D.C., on May 5, be made with the producer as provided 1966. M a y 5,1966. in § 1421.72 and this section. Resolved that, notice and public pro (a) Commingled warehouse stored. E. A. Jaenke, Acting Executive Vice President, cedure having been duly afforded (31 Settlement for eligible beans stored com Commodity Credit Corporation. F.R. 4808) and all relevant material pre mingled in an approved warehouse and sented or available having been con acquired by CCC under a loan or by pur [F.R. Doc. 66-5111; Filed, May 10, 1966; 8:46 a.m.] sidered by it, the Federal Home Loan chase shall be made on the basis of the Bank Board, upon the basis of such con class, grade, and quality and net weight sideration and of determination by it of which are specified by the warehouse Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING the advisability of amendment of para receipt representing such beans or the graph (a) of § 522.71 and § 524.6 of the supplemental certificate, if applicable. Chapter I— Bureau of the Comptroller Regulations for the Federal Home Loan (b) Other storage. Settlement for of the Currency, Department of the Bank System (12 CFR 522.71(a) and eligible beans acquired under loan or Treasury 524.6) and for the purpose of effecting by purchase not stored commingled in such amendments, hereby amends said an approved warehouse shall be made on PART 1— INVESTMENT SECURITIES paragraph and said section as follows ef the basis of the class, grade, and quality REGULATION fective June 11, 1966: shown on Federal or Federal-State Paragraph (a) of § 522.71 is hereby lot inspection certificates and on the State of Israel Bonds, Development amended to read as follows: basis of the quantity shown on official Investment Issue weight certificates, except that the § 1.171 Slate o f Israel Bonds, Develop § 522.71 Compensation. weight of bagged beans shall be the ment Investment Issue. (a) The board of directors of each net weight of the lot as determined from (a). Request. The Comptroller of the Bank shall annually adopt and submit to the official weight certificate or a Currency has been requested to rule that the Board appropriate resolutions show-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11; 1966 6906 RULES AND REGULATIONS ing the contemplated compensation of (d) Castings are not shipped off the of a revision of the recommended warn officers and legal counsel, to be effective shelf but are produced to order with ing statement for belladonna and related during the next calendar year. The several weeks lead time. preparations, the Commissioner of Food Board will, for each Bank, either approve (38 Stat. 717, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 41-58: and Drugs concluded that the warning or disapprove, in whole or in part, such 49 Stat. 1526; 15 U.S.C. 13, as amended) statement should be expanded for clarifi cation as set forth below. proposed compensation and will advise Issued: May 10, 1966. the Bank of its action relating thereto. Therefore, in accordance with the Each Bank may establish the amount By direction of the Commission. provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and form of compensation of all other [ s e a l ] x J o s e p h W. S h e a , and Cosmetic Act (secs. 502(f)(2), employees within the limits set forth in Secretary. 701(a), 52 Stat. 1051, 1055; 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(2), 371(a)), and under the au its approved budget. No bonus shall be [P.R. Doc. 66-5086; Filed, May 10, 1966; paid by any Bank to any director, officer, , 8:45 a.m.] thority delegated to the Commissioner employee or other person. by the Secretary of Health, Education, 4c * * * * and Welfare (21 CFR 2.120; 31 F.R. PART 15— ADMINISTRATIVE 3008), § 131.15 is amended by adding a Section 524.6 is-hereby amended to OPINIONS AND RULINGS new sentence to the end of the warning read as follows: Agreement Among Retailers for statement for the subject preparations. § 524.6 Budgets. As changed the warning statement reads Uniform Store Hours as follows: Each Bank shall prepare and submit to the Board for its approval a budget of § 15.44 Agreement among retailers for § 131.15 Drugs for human use; recom operations in the manner and according uniform store hours. mended warning and caution state to the procedure prescribed in its bylaws. (a) A retail dealers association of a ments. Each Bank shall submit to the Board certain city of substantial size has been ***** with its budget a certificate signed by its advised that a proposed agreement BELLADONNA PREPARATIONS * * * president as to the compliance by each of among downtown retailers to establish its officers, legal counsel and employees uniform store hours would not, under the Warning—Not to be used by persons with the provisions of § 522.70 of this circumstances presented, be in violation having glaucoma or excessive pressure subchapter. The Board will either ap of any laws administered by the Federal within the eye, by elderly persons (where prove the budget as submitted by each Trade Commission. undiagndSed glaucoma or excessive pres Bank or approve such budget with such (b) The stated existing downtown sure within the eye occurs most fre adjustments therein as to it appears shopping hours are 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. quently), or by children under 6 years proper. A Bank may at any time adopt with Monday and some Thursday hours of age, unless directed by a physician. and request the Board’s approval of an from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. The proposed Discontinue use if blurring of vision, amendment to its approved budget and, change would make the hours from 11 rapid pulse, or dizziness occurs. Do not upon approval of any such amendment a.m. to 8 p.m. weekdays and 9 a.m. to exceed recommended dosage. Not for by the Board, such Bank shall be op-~ 5:30 p.m. on Saturday. frequent or prolonged use. If dryness erated within such amended budget. (c) The basic reason advanced for the of the mouth occurs, decrease dosage. proposed change in hours is to place the I f eye pain occurs, discontinue use and (Sec. 17, 47 Stat. 736, as amended; 12 U.S.C. downtown retailers in a more effective see your physician immediately as this 1437. Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1947, 12 P.R. competitive position with suburban may indicate undiagnosed glaucoma. 4981, 3 CFR, 1947 Supp.) shopping centers by establishing more 4c * * * * By the Federal Home Loan Bank convenient shopping hours for office Notice and public procedure are un Board. workers and4>y enabling spouses to meet necessary prerequisites to the promul for dinner and shop. Any business es [ s e a l ] H ar r y W. C a u l s e n , gation of this order, and I so find, since Secretary. tablishment will have the free choice as the statute provides that the labeling of to whether or not to conform to the drugs shall bear “ adequate warnings [P.R. Doc. 66-5125; Piled, May 10, 1966; proposed change in shopping hours. 8:47 a.m.] against use in those pathological condi (38 Stat. 717, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 41-58) tions * * * where its use may be dan Issued: May 10, 1966. gerous to health,” and the clinical his tory of the drugs named is such that the Title 16-COMMERCIAL By direction of the Commission. revised warning is deemed necessary for [ s e a l ] J o s e ph W. S h e a , the protection of the public health. PRACTICES Secretary. Effective date. This order shall be [P.R. Doc. 66-5087; Piled, May 10, 1966; come effective July 4,1966. Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission 8:45 a.m.] (Secs. 502(f) (2), 701(a), 52 Stat. 1051, 1055; PART 15— ADMINISTRATIVE 21 U.S.C. 352(f) (2 ), 3 7 1(a)) OPINIONS AND RULINGS Dated: May 6,1966. Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGS James L. G oddard, Goods of Like Grade and Quality Chapter I— Food and Drug Adminis Commissioner of Food and Drugs. § 15.43 Goods of like grade and quality. tration, Department of Health, Edu [F.R. Doc. 66-5135; Piled, May 10, 1966; 8:48 a.m.] The Federal Trade Commission ad cation, and Welfare vised a manufacturer producing iron SUBCHAPTER C— DRUGS castings to special order of its customers PART 131— INTERPRETATIVE STATE Title 32— NATIONAL DEFENSE that such goods are not of like grade and MENTS RE WARNINGS ON DRUGS quality within the meaning of that sec AND DEVICES FOR OVER-THE- Chapter XIV— The Renegotiation tion of the amended Clayton Act Board prohibiting price discriminations. The COUNTER SALE Commission was informed by the manu SUBCHAPTER B— RENEGOTIATION BOARD Belladonna Preparations and Prep REGULATIONS UNDER THE 1951 ACT facturer that: arations of Its Alkaloids (Atropine, (a) Its eastings are produced in ac Hyoscyamine, and Scopolamine PART 1472— CONDUCT OF cordance with individual customer spec (Hyoscine)); Hyoscyamus, Stramo^ RENEGOTIATION ifications; nium, Their Derivatives, and Re Filing of Information and Requests (b) It submits samples to the customer lated Drug Preparations by Contractor for approval; (c) The customer further processes Following publication in the F ederal Section 1472.6(d) Place for filing is the casting prior to use; and R egister of May 5, 1966 (31 F.R. 6705), amended by deleting subparagraph (1)

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6907 in its entirety and substituting in lieu Order No. 10355 of May 26, 1952 (17 F.R. thereof the following: Title 41— PUBLIC CONTRACTS 4831), it is ordered as follows: § 1472.6 Filing of information and re 1. Subject to valid existing rights, the quests by contractors. AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT following described lands are hereby * * * * * withdrawn from all forms of appropria Chapter 9— Atomic Energy tion under the public land laws, including (d) Place for filing.— (1) Principal Commission the mining laws (30 U.S.C., Ch. 2), but offices. The principal office of the Board PART 9-12— LABOR not from leasing under the mineral leas is located at 1910 K Street NW., Wash ing laws, and ar£ added to and made a ington, D.C., 20446. The following are Subpart 9—12.54— Conduct of Em part of the Ouray National Wildlife the addresses of the offices of the Re Refuge: gional Boards: ployees and Consultants of AEC Cost-Type Contractors and Certain Sa l t L a k e M eridian Eastern Regional Renegotiation Board, 1634 Other Contractors T. 7 S., R. 20 E., Eye Street NW., Washington, D.C., 20447. Sec. 24, lot 6, NW&NE&, NWy4, SE%SE%; Western Regional Renegotiation Board, 300 M iscellaneous A mendments Sec. 25, lots 1 and 6, N E ^ N E 1^. North Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, T. 7 S., R. 21E., Calif., 90012. Subpart 9-12.5402 Gratuities, is re Sec. 19, lots 9 and 10; ***** vised to read as follows: Sec. 29, lot 4; (Sec. 109, 65 Stat. 22; 50 U.S.C., App. Supp. § 9—12.5402 Gratuities. Sec. 30, lots 2 to 6, incl.; 1219) Sec. 31, lots 17,18,19, 25, 26; A contractor or his employees or con Sec. 32, lots 18,19 and 20; Dated: May 6,1966. sultants shall not, under circumstances Sec. 33, lots 2 and 3. T. 8 S., R. 20 E., L awrence E. H artwig, which might reasonably be interpreted as an attempt to influence the recipients Sec. 10, SE 14SW 14; Chairman. Sec. 11, lots 1,4, and 5; in the conduct of their duties, accept any Sec. 12, lot 2, SE% SW i4,S%SEi4; [F.R. Doc. 66-5122; Piled, May 10, 1966; gratuity or special favor from individ 8:47 a.m.] Sec. 13, N E ^ S E ^ .S ^ S E i/ i; uals or organizations with whom the Sec. 15, N W % , Ni/2SW%, SW&SWi,4; contractor is doing business, or propos Sec. 21, lot 6; ing to do business, in accomplishing the Sec. 23, part lot 8, northwest of road, part work under the contract. Reference NW*4SEy4SW]4 northwest of road, part Title 33— NAVIGATION AND should also be made to the provisions of NW ^NW ^SE^ northwest of road; 41 U.S.C. Jtt-54. Sec. 24, NEy4NWy4; Sec. 26, part N W & S W & N W ^ , northwest NAVIGABLE WATERS Subpart 9-12.5409 is deleted in its en of road; Chapter II——Corps of Engineers, tirety. Sec. 27, lot 1, part SE%NE»4 northwest of Department of the Army (Sec. 161 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, road; as amended, 68 Stat. 948, 42 U.S.C. 2001; Sec. 28, lot 1. PART 203— BRIDGE REGULATIONS sec. 205 of the Federal Property and Ad T. 8 S., R. 21 E., ministrative Services Act of 1949, as amend Sec. 5, lots 1, 6, 7 S ^ N E ^ ; Mystic River, Mass. ed, 63 Stat. 390, 40 U.S.C. 486) Sec. 6, lots 9, 10, 16, 17, 18, 19, N E ^ S W 1^; Effective date. This amendment is ef Sec. 7, S E ^ S W % ; Pursuant to the provisions of section 5 Sec. 18, Ey2SWy4, WI/2SE14. fective upon publication in the F ederal of the River and Harbor Act of August R egister. 18, 1894 (28 Stat. 362; 33 U.S.C. 499), Containing 2,158.96 acres, more or less. paragraph (g) (2), § 203.75 governing the For the U.S. Atomic Energy Commis 2. The minerals in the lands, now or operation of the General Lawrence High sion. hereafter owned by the United States, way Bridge across Mystic River, Mass., is Dated at Germantown, Md., this 4th shall be administered in accordance with hereby amended in its entirety effective day of May 1966. laws and regulations governing the man 30 days after publication in the F ederal R e g ister , as follows: Joseph L. S m ith, agement and disposal of minerals in Director, Division of Contracts. lands forming a part of the national § 203.75 Boston Harbor, Mass., and wildlife refuge system. However, cer adjacent waters; bridges. [P.R. Doc. 66-5091; Piled, May 10, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] ♦ * * * He tain of the lands are tribal lands of the Uintah-Ouray Indian Reservation which (g) Mystic River. * * * (2) Metropolitan District Commission have been leased by the tribe for refuge highway btidge (General Lawrence Title 43— PUBLIC LANDS: purposes. In the tribal lands only the Bridge) opposite Harvard Street, Med minerals reserved to the United States ford. The draw need not be opened for INTERIOR by the act of March 11,1948 (62 Stat. 72), the passage of vessels, and paragraphs are subject to administration under pro (b) to (f) of this section shall not apply Chapter II— Bureau of Land Manage visions of this order. The remaining to this bridge. ment, Department of the Interior lands have been acquired, or are in proc * * * * * APPENDIX— PUBLIC LAND ORDERS ess of being acquired by the United [Regs., Apr. 25, 1966, 1507-32 (Mystic River, Mass.) -ENGCW-ON] (Sec. 5, 28 Stat. 362; 33 [Public Land Order 3999] States for refuge purposes. U.S.C. 499) [Utah 053035] H arry R. Anderson, J. C. L a m b er t, Major General, U.S. Army, Addition to Ouray National Wildlife Assistant Secretary of the Interior. The Adjutant General. Refuge M a y 3,1966. [P.R. Doc. 66-5096; Piled, May 10, 1966; By virtue of the authority vested in [P.R. Doc. 66-5104; Piled, May 10, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] the President and pursuant to Executive 8:46 am.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6908

Proposed Rule Making

and services necessary to promoting the cidentally with that relocation the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY safe, orderly and expeditious flow of civil Agency proposes the airspace alterations air traffic. Its purpose is to insure that and designations hereinafter set forth. Bureau of Customs civil flying on international air routes is 1. The 1,200-foot portion of the [ 19 CFR Part 20 1 carried out under uniform conditions de Charleston transition area would be re signed to improve the safety and effi described as that airspace extending [142.72] ciency of air operations. upward from 1,200 feet above the surface DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED AND The International Standards and bounded by a line beginning at the inter ABANDONED MERCHANDISE Recommended Practices in Annex 11 section of the SE boundary of V-3 and apply An those parts of the airspace latitude 33°30'00" N., thence eastward Rescission of Proposed Amendment under the jurisdiction of a contracting to latitude 33°11'55" N., longitude 79°- state, derived from ICAO, wherein air 08'00" W., to latitude 32°58'30" N., Notice was published in the F ederal traffic services are provided and also longitude 79°18'00" W., to latitude 32°- R egister of February 4, 1965 (30 F.R. whenever a contracting state accepts the 50'40" N., longitude 79°23'15" W., 1196), of a proposal to amend the responsibility of providing air traffic thence clockwise along the arc of a 38- Customs Regulations to authorize the services over high seas or in airspace of mile ^radius circle centered on the sale of merchandise not exceeding $50 in undetermined sovereignty. A contract Charleston VORTAC to and west along value at public auction after it has re ing state accepting such responsibility a line 5 miles S of and parallel to the mained in general order for 90 days. may apply the International Standards Charleston VORTAC 109° True radial to Since the publication of the notice, and Recommended Practices to civil air a point 3 nautical miles E of the shore further field studies have indicated that craft in a manner consistent with that line, thence SW along a line 3 nautical there is insufficient justification for adopted for airspace under its domestic m iles from the shoreline to latitude changing the present regulation. The jurisdiction. 32°29'30" N., longitude 80°12'00" W.,'” proposal, therefore, is rescinded. In accordance with Article 3 of the thence to latitude 32°45'50" N., longi The current practice of handling un Convention on International Civil Avia tude 80°30'30" W., to latitude 32°44'00" claimed and abandoned merchandise re tion, Chicago, 1944, state aircraft are N., longitude 80°43'25" W., thence to the mains unaffected; that is, unclaimed and intersection of the SE boundary of V-3 abandoned merchandise continues to be exempt from the provisions of Annex 11 and its Standards and Recommended and latitude 32°44'00" N., thence NE sold at the next regular sale after the along the SE boundary of V-3 to the merchandise becomes subject to sale. Practices. As a contracting state, the U.S. agreed by Article 3(d) that its state point of beginning. , [ s e a l ] L ester D. J o h n s o n , aircraft will be operated in international The Myrtle Beach transition area is Commissioner of Customs. airspace with due regard for the safety presently designated as that airspace ex tending upward from 700 feet above the Approved: May 3,1966. of civil aircraft. Since this action involves, in part, the surface within a 7-mile radius of Myrtle J a m e s P o m e r o y H e n d r ic k , . designation of navigable airspace out Beach AFB (latitude 33°40'45" N., lon Acting Assistant Secretary side the United States, the Administrator gitude 78°55'45" W .), within a 5-mile of the Treasury. has consulted with the Secretary of State radius of Crescent Beach/Myrtle Beach [P R . Doc. 66-5129; Piled, May 10, 1966; and the Secretary of Defense in accord Airport (latitude 33°48'40" N., longitude 8:48 a.m.] ance with the provisions of Executive 78°43'30" W.) ; within 2 miles each side Order 10854. of the Myrtle Beach VOR 058° True ra Interested persons may participate in dial extending from the Myrtle Beach the proposed rule making by submitting AFB 7-mile radius area to the Crescent FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY such written data, views, or arguments Beach/Myrtle Beach Airport 5-mile ra dius area; that airspace extending up I 14 CFR Part 71 1 as they may desire. Communications should identify the airspace docket ward from 1,200 feet above the surface [Airspace Docket No. 65-SO-80] "number and be submitted in triplicate bounded by a line beginning at the IN T to the Director, Southern Region, Atten of the E boundary of V-437E and a line CONTROL ZONES AND TRANSITION 5 miles S of and parallel to the Florence, AREAS tion: Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Agency, Post Office Box 20636, S.C., VORTAC 068° True radial, extend Proposed Alteration Atlanta, Ga„ 30320. All communica ing eastward along that line and a line tions received within 30 days after pub 5 miles S of and parallel to the Wilming The Federal Aviation Agency is con ton, N.C., VORTAC 272° True radial to lication of this notice in the F ederal sidering amendments to Part 71 of the its ENT with longitude 78°25'30" W., R eg ister will be considered before action Federal Aviation Regulations which is taken on the proposed amendments. thence to latitude 33°58'30" N., longi would alter the Charleston, S.C., and The proposals contained in this notice tude 78°10'45" W., thence to latitude Myrtle Beach, S.C., transition areas, and may be changed in the light of comments 33°40'10" N., longitude 78°40'10" W., the Myrtle Beach control zone, and would •thence clockwise along a 15-mile radius received. designate a part-time control zone at the arc centered on the Myrtle Beach An official docket will be available for Crescent Beach-Myrtle Beach Airport. TACAN (latitude 33°40'39" N., longitude examination by interested persons at As parts of these proposals relate to 78°55'53" W .) to a line 5 miles SE of and the Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the navigable airspace outside the United parallel to the Myrtle Beach VOR 214° the General Counsel, Attention: Rules States, this notice is submitted in con True radial, thence SW along that line to sonance with the ICAO International Docket, 800 Independence Avenue SW., a 25-mile radius arc centered on the Washington, D.C., 20553. An informal Standards and Recommended Practices. Myrtle Beach AFB (latitude 33° 40'45" Applicability of ' International Stand docket also will be available for exami N., longitude 78° 55 '45" W .), thence ards and Recommended Practices, by the nation at the office of the Regional Air clockwise along this arc to the SE bound Air Traffic Service, FAA, in areas outside Traffic Division Chief. ary of V -l, thence along V -l to latitude On or about June 23,1966, the Federal domestic airspace of the United States is 33°16'00" N „ longitude 79°24'30" W., Aviation Agency plans to relocate the governed by Article 12 and Annex 11 to thence to the E boundary of V-437E at the Convention on International Civil Myrtle Beach VOR at latitude 33°48'48" N., longitude 78°43'31" W., and to con latitude 33°20'00" N., longitude 79°- Aviation (IC A O ), which pertains to the 39'20" W., thence N along V-437E to the establishment of air navigation facilities vert the facility to a VORTAC. Coin-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 6909

point of beginning ; and that airspace ex VOR; within 2 miles each side of the station will be authorized at any landing tending upward from 2,700 feet MSL Myrtle Beach TACAN 160° and 355° area. This restriction is good and neces bounded on the N by a 35-mile radius True radiais, extending from the 5-mile sary from the standpoint of aviation arc centered on Grannis Field, Fayette radius zone to 8 miles S and 8 miles N of safety. In some instances, however, it ville, N.C. (latitude 34°59'25" N., longi the TACAN; within 2 miles each side of causes an interruption of advisory serv tude 78°52'50" W .), on the E by a line the 167° True bearing from the Conway ice to the landing area. For instance, extending from the IN T of the S bound RBN, extending from the 5-mile radius a fixed-base operator who is the licensee ary of V-525 and longitude 780 30'00'' W. zone to the RBN. of an advisory station gives up his busi to latitude 34o18'30" N., longitude 79°- 3. The name of the Myrtle Beach con ness, leaves the area, and, in effect, 00'00" W., on the S by a line 5 miles S trol zone would be changed to Myrtle abandons the aeronautical advisory sta of and parallel to the Wilmington, N.C., Beach AFB, S.C., control zone and tion without cancelling the authorization. VORTAC 272° True radial and Florence, amended to read ; within a 5-mile radius This leaves an outstanding authorization S.C., VORTAC 068° True radial, on the of Myrtle Beach AFB (latitude 33°40'45" for an aeronautical advisory station to W by V-437E and V-3E, excluding that N., longitude 78°55'45" W.) ; within 2 serve the landing area but no service is airspace within 5 miles SE of the Flor miles each side of the Myrtle Beach being rendered. Section 87.251(c) as ence, S.C., VORTAC 052° True radial, TACAN 160° and 355° True radiais, ex presently written, precludes the licensing extending from the VORTAC to 14 miles tending from the 5-mile radius zone to of another advisory station at a landing NE. 8 miles S and 8 miles N of the TACAN; area while an authorization is out 2. The Myrtle Beach transition areawithin 2 miles each side of the 167° True standing. There are other similar situa would be redesignated as that airspace bearing from the Conway radio beacon, tions which also may cause breaks in extending upward from 700 feet above extending from the 5-mile radius zone service. Accordingly, it is proposed to the surface within a 7-mile radius of to the radio beacon. amend § 87.251 (c) to allow, under certain Myrtle Beach AFB (latitude 33°40'45" 4. The Crescent Beach/Myrtle Beach, conditions, operation of an additional N., longitude 78°55'45" W.) ; within a S.C., control zone would be designated station at a landing area when the 6-mile radius of Crescent Beach/Myrtle within a 5-mile radius of Crescent original station has ceased to provide Beach Airport (latitude 33°48'40" N., Beach/Myrtle Beach Airport (latitude service. longitude 78°43'30" W.) ; w ith in 2 33°48'40" N., longitude 78°43'30" W .) ; 4. In order for an applicant to qualify miles each side of the Myrtle Beach within 2 miles each side of the Myrtle for an aeronautical advisory station VORTAC 052° True radial, extending Beach VORTAC 052° True radial extend under the present rules, he must be the from the 6-mile radius area to 8 miles ing from the 5-mile radius zone to 8 miles owner of the landing area or if not the NE of the VORTAC; within 2 miles NE of the VORTAC; within 2 miles each owner, a party to a written contractual each side of th e M y rtle B each side of the Myrtle Beach VORTAC 214° agreement with the owner which gives VORTAC 214° True radial, extending True radial extending from the 5-mile the nonowner applicant the exclusive and from the 6-mile radius area to 14 radius zone to 8 miles SW of the sole right to establish and maintain an miles SW of the VORTAC; that air VORTAC. This control zone would be aeronautical advisory station to serve the space extending upward from 1,200 feet effective during specific dates and/or owner’s landing area for a time certain. above the surface bounded by a line be times established in advance by a Notice This rule is based on the theory that if ginning at the intersection of the E to Airmen and continuously published in the owner of the landing area is not boundary of V-437E and a line 5 miles the Airman’s Information Manual. going to provide the service, it would be S of and parallel to the Florence, S.C., These amendments are proposed in his interest to allow the most respon VORTAC 068° True radial, thence east under the authority of secs. 307(a) and sible and capable person available to be ward to latitude 34°18'40" N„ longitude 1110 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 come licensee of the station. In practice, 79° 11'00" W., thence along a line ex (49 U.S.C. 1348, 1510) and Executive however, it appears that this method tending from latitude 34° 18'40" N., lon Order 10854 (24 F.R. 9565). does not always result in the selection of gitude 79°11'00" W., through latitude Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 5, the most responsible and capable person. 34°17'45" N., longitude 78°25'30" W., to 1966. In addition, problems are created when the E boundary of V-213, to latitude 33 °- H . B. H e ls t r o m , an owner withdraws his authority during 58'30" N., longitude 78°10'45" W., to lat Acting Chief, Airspace and the term of an outstanding authoriza itude 33°40'10" N., longitude 78°40'15" Air Traffic Rules Division. tion. Accordingly, the Commission pro W., thence clockwise along the arc of a poses to amend the rules to allow, as far 15-mile radius circle centered on the [F.R. Doc. 66-5093; Filed, May 10, 1966; as practicable, for the selection by the 8:45 a.m.] Myrtle Beach TACAN (latitude 33°40'39" Commission of the most responsible and N., longitude 78°55'53" W .), to latitude capable person as licensee. 33°27'40" N., longitude 78°55'20" W., 5. It is proposed that the special eli thence to latitude 33°19'40" N., longitude FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS gibility requirements of § 87.251(d) be 79°02'10" W., to latitude 33°11'55" N., deleted. An applicant for an advisory longitude 79°08'00" W., to latitude 33 °- station under the proposed rules would 20'00" N., longitude 79°39'20" W., COMMISSION be required to provide notification of his thence N along the E boundary of V - E 47 CFR Parts 2, 87 1 application for an advisory station to 437E to the point of beginning ; and that [Docket No. 16221, FCC 66-401] persons who would have a primary airspace extending upward from 2,700 interest in the efficient operation of an feet MSL bounded on the N by the arc AERONAUTICAL ADVISORY SERVICE aeronautical advisory station at the par of a 35-mile radius circle" centered on ticular landing area. This would pro Grannis Field, Fayetteville, N.C. (lati Notice of Proposed Rule Making vide an opportunity for an interested tude 34°59'25" N., longitude 78°52'50" 1. Notice of proposed rule making in party to file a protest during the section W .), on the E by the 2,700-foot MSL por the above-entitled matter is hereby 309(b) statutory notice period, file a tion of the Goldsboro, N.C., transition given. competing application for an aeronau area, on the S by the 1,200-foot portion 2. The Commission, as a result of ad tical advisory station at the same land of the Myrtle Beach transition area, on ministering the aeronautical advisory ing area or enter into some mutual the W by V-437E and V-3E, excluding service, Part 87—Subpart C and the sharing arrangements with the prospec the portion that would coincide with the recent report of the Radio Technical tive licensee. Florence, S.C., transition area. Commission for Aeronautics (SC-113), 6. The rapid growth and growth poten The Myrtle Beach control zone is pres feels that certain amendments could tial of the aeronautical advisory service ently designated with a 5-mile radius of provide a more orderly and efficient serv dictates that consideration be given to Myrtle Beach AFB (latitude 33°40'45" ice. Accordingly, this notice proposes frequency congestion and interference. N., longitude 78°55'45" W.) ; within 2 extensive revision of the rules governing At present, no separation criteria are miles each side of the Myrtle Beach VOR the aeronautical advisory service. established for ground stations and 039° True radial, extending from the 5- 3. The present rules, § 87.251(c), pro reception of several stations at one time mile radius zone to 8 miles NE of the vide that only one aeronautical advisory is a source of confusion and interference

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6910 PROPOSED RULE MAKING to airborne aircraft. This problem could US31 The band 121.975-123.075 Mc/s is available to private aircraft upon show become acute in the near future as more for use by private aircraft stations. In ad ing that a need exists and that agree dition, the frequencies 122.80, 122.85, 122.95, ments have been made with the licensees and more advisory radio facilities are 123.00, and 123.05 Mc/s may be used by established. In order to minimize inter aeronautical advisory stations and the fre of appropriate ground stations. ference potential from the increase in ad quency 122.90 Mc/s may be used by aeronau 4. Subpart C of Part 87 is amended to visory stations, new criteria for frequency tical multicom stations. read as follows: assignments are proposed. 7. Frequency assignment, as proposed, 2. Section 87.99(a) is amended to read Subpart C— Aeronautical Advisory is based on the type of landing area in as follows: Stations volved; i.e., controlled, uncontrolled, heli § 87.99 Information required in station § 87.251 Special conditions. port, private or public. During the term logs. of a license, the status of the landing (a) Only one aeronautical advisory area may change and thereby require a (à) Except for radionavigation land station may be authorized to operate at change in frequency by the licensee. test stations (M T F ), all stations at fixed a landing area: Provided, however, When such a change occurs in the status locations shall maintain logs showing Where the Commission has good cause of the landing area, the licensee would be hours of operation, frequencies used and to believe that an existing station has required to operate on the appropriate hours of duty and signature of the opera been abandoned or ceased operation, an frequency. In addition, a less restrictive tor (s) on duty. In any instance where other station may be authorized to pro log-keeping requirement has been pro communications pertain to emergency, vide service at the landing area on an posed in order to lessen the burden of distress or danger to life or property, interim basis while the original station the station operator. the specific station communicated with, is not operating and pending final deter 8. In order that the rules specifically the time of the communications and the mination of the status Of the original directed to the aeronautical advisory nature of the communications shall be station. service may be viewed in their entirety, recorded. (b) An applicant for an aeronautical the proposed amendments together with ***** advisory station license must give writ existing sections which remain un 3. Section 87.201 is amended to read as ten notice of such application to the changed are included in the Appendix. follows : owner of the landing area to be served The unchanged sections in the Appendix and all aviation service organizations, are as follows: §§87.201 (a), (d), (e), § 87.201 Frequencies available. so-called fixed-base operators, who are and ( f ), 87.255, 87.257 (a ), (b ), (c ), and The following frequencies, in addition located at the landing area. Such notice (e ) , and 87.259. v shall include the applicant’s name and 9. The Radio Technical Commission to those listed in § 87.183 are available to private aircraft stations: address, name of the landing area to for Aeronautics (RTCA) recently com be served, and a statement that the ap pleted a study of the aeronautical ad (a) 3023.5 kilocycles: Aircraft calling and working frequency for use by private plicant intends to file an application with visory service in SC-113. It recom the Federal Communications Commis mended changes in the eligibility re aircraft. (b) These frequencies are available to sion for an aeronautical advisory station quirements and assignment of additional private aircraft for air traffic control (Unicom) to serve the named landing frequencies. The present proposal is operations: area. Such notice shall be given within consistent with the recommendations of the 10-day period immediately preceding RTCA. 122.00, 122.05, 122.10, 122.15, 122.20, 122.25, the filing of the application with the 10. The proposed amendments to the 122.30, 122.35, 122.40, 122.45, 122.50, 122.55, Commission. rules, as set forth in the Appendix, are 122.60,122.65,122.70 and 122.75 Mc/s. (c) Each applicant must submit a issued pursuant to the authority con (c) These frequencies are available to statement as part of the application that tained in sections 4(i) and 303 (b ), (c), private aircraft stations for communica notice has been given in accordance with (f) , (h ), (j), and (r) of the Communica tions (1) with aeronautical advisory sta paragraph (b) of this section and list tions Act of 1934, as amended. tions in accordance with Subpart C of the names and addresses of persons 11. Pursuant to applicable procedures this Part and (2) between private air given written notice including the dates set forth in § 1.415 of the Commission’s craft while in flight provided that harm when such notices were given. rules, interested persons may file com ful interference is not caused to air- (d) An applicant for interim author ments on or before June 17, 1966 and ground communications and such com ity under paragraph (a) of this section reply comments on or before July 8,1966. munications pertain to the safety of the must give notice, where possible, to the All relevant and timely comments and flight: present licensee of the aeronautical ad reply comments will be considered by the visory station at the landing area and Commission before final action is taken 122.80,122.85, 122.95 and 123.05 Mc/s. must also meet the notice requirements in this proceeding. In reaching its deci In addition, brief keyed R F signals may of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. sion in this proceeding, the Commission be transmitted on these frequencies for (e) An aeronautical advisory station may also take into account other rele the control of airport lights from aircraft and any associated dispatch or control vant information before it, in addition on the condition that no harmful inter points must be located on the landing to the specific comments invited by this ference is caused to authorized voice area to be served. notice. communications. § 87.253 Frequency assignment. 12. In accordance with the provisions (d) 122.9 Mc/s, 6A3 emission: Private of § 1.419 of the Commission’s rules, an aircraft stations to aeronautical multi (a) Aeronautical advisory stations at original and 14 copies of all statements, com stations and to Government stations landing areas open to the public must briefs or comments filed shall be fur in accordance with the scope of service provide service on a required frequency nished the Commission. set forth in § 87.277. Between private as follows: Adopted: May 4,1966. aircraft stations and between private (1) Landing area, other than a heli Released: May 6,1966. aircraft stations and Government air port, where there is not a control tower craft stations while in flight for com or FA A flight service station— 122.8 F ederal C ommunications munications pertaining to safety; agri Mc/s; C o m m is s io n ,1 cultural, ranching and conservation ac (2) Landing area, other than a heli [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , tivities; forest fire fighting; aerial ap port, where there is a control tower or Secretary. plication; aerial advertising; and para FAA flight service station— 123.0 Mc/s; A p p e n d ix chute jumping. (3) Landing area that is used exclu 1. Footnote US31 to the Table of Fre (e) 123.0 megacycles, 6A3 emission: sively as a heliport— 123.05 Mc/s. quency Allocations, § 2.106 is amended to Private aircraft stations to aeronautical (b) Upon a showing of need, stations read as follows: advisory stations in accordance with the required to provide service on 123.05 Mc/s scope of service set forth in § 87.257. also may be assigned 122.8 Mc/s for com 1 Commissioners Loevinger and Wadsworth (f ) The aeronautical frequencies listed munication primarily with fixed wing absent. under §§ 87.293 through 87.309 are also aircraft, and stations required to provide

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966

X PROPOSED RULE MAKING 6911 service on 122.8 or 123.0 Mc/s also may formation during the hours of operation curement and stockpiling of necessary ma be assigned 123.05 Mc/s for communica of the airdrome control station or PAA terials and supplies: the provision of suitable tions primarily with helicopters. flight service station. (2) On a second warning systems; the construction or prepa (c) Stations at landing areas not openary basis, communications may be trans ration of shelters, shelter areas, and control centers; and when appropriate, the nonmili to the public normally will be assigned mitted which pertain to the efficient tary evacuation of civil population), (b) a frequency in accordance with the pro portal-to-portal transit of which the measures to be taken during attack (includ vision of paragraph (a) of this section. flight is a portion, such as, requests for ing the enforcement of passive defense regu An alternate frequency of either 122.85 ground transportation, food or lodging lations prescribed by duly established mili or 122.95 Mc/s, in lieu of that normally required during transit. tary or civil authorities; the evacuation of assigned, may be authorized upon a (e) The frequency 122.8 Mc/s may bepersonnel to shelter areas; the control of showing that harmful interference will used, in addition to its normal purposes, traffic and panic; and the control and use of be avoided bv the use of such alternate lighting and civil communications) ; and for communications with private aircraft (c) measures to be taken following attack frequency. engaged in organized civil defense ac (including activities for the fire fighting; tivities in time-of enemy attack or im §87.255 Power output. rescue, emergency medical, health and sani mediately thereafter, and on a secondary tation services; monitoring for specific The power output of aeronautical ad basis for communications with private hazards of special weapons; unexploded visory stations shall not exceed 10 watts. aircraft engaged in organized civil de bomb reconnaissance; essential debris clear fense activities in preparation for antici ance; emergency welfare measures; and im § 87.257 Scope o f service. mediately essential emergency repair or res pated enemy attack. When used for toration of damaged vital facilities). (a) At all times when an aeronautical these purposes, aeronautical advisory advisory station is in operation, non stations may be moyed from place to §87.259 Operator requirements. public service shall be provided to any place or operated at unspecified locations, (a) An aeronautical advisory station private aircraft station upon request and except at landing areas served by other shall be operated, when transmitting without discrimination. aeronautical advisory stations or air during the normal rendition of service, (b) Communications by an aeronau drome control stations, or both. by a person holding a commercial radio tical advisory station shall be impartial operator license or permit of any class. with respect to information concerning N o t e : “Civil defense” is defined, for this purpose, in accordance with section 3(b) of (b) Aircraft radio stations using ra similar available ground services. the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, Public diotelephony, when transmitting during (c) Aeronautical advisory stations Law 920, 81st Congress as follows: the normal rendition of service, shall be shall not be used for air traffic control The term “civil defense” means all those operated by persons holding any class of purposes. activities and measures designed or under commercial radio operator license or (d) (1) Communications by an aero taken (1) to minimize the effects upon the permit. civilian population caused or which would nautical advisory station shall be limited (c) All transmitter adjustments or to the necessities of safe and expeditious be caused by an attack upon the United States, (2) to deal with the immediate tests during or coincident with the instal operation of private aircraft, such as, emergency conditions which would be cre lation, servicing, or maintenance of a conditions of runways, types of fuel ated by any such attack, and (3) to effectu radio station, which may affect the available, wind conditions, weather in ate emergency repairs to, or the emergency proper operation of such station, shall formation, dispatching or other neces restoration of, vital utilities and facilities be made by or under the immediate sary information: Provided, however, destroyed or damaged by any such attack. supervision and responsibility of a person That at any landing area at which an Such term shall include, but shall not be holding a first or second class commer airdrome control station or PAA flight limited to, (a ) measures to be taken in cial radio operator licence, either radio telephone or radiotelegraph, who shall be service station is located, an aeronautical preparation for anticipated attack (including responsible for the proper functioning of advisory station shall not transmit in the establishment of appropriate organiza tions, operational plans, and supporting the station equipment. formation pertaining to the conditions of agreements: the recruitment and training of [F.R. Doc. 66-5136; Filed, May 10, 1966; runways, wind conditions or weather in- personnel: the conduct of research; the pro- 8:48 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 No. 91 4 6912

Notices

li. Barge Nos. 217-222, built in 1957, S tatement of P rovisional F in d in g s and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (All above built in Mobile, Ala.) C o nc lu sio n s b y the B oard 1. Barge Nos. 223 and 224, built in 1960 Bureau of Customs (at Norfolk, Va.). Service mail rates for the carriage of U.S. mail to most Latin American and [T.D. 66-98] [ seal] L ester D. Jo h n so n , Caribbean points are now open by virtue Commissioner of Customs. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO. of a petition filed by the Postmaster Gen [P.R. Doc. 66-5130; Filed, May 10, 1966; eral on June 30, 1964. Specifically, the Notice of U.S. Citizenship 8:48 a.m.] services for which rates are currently open are those of Pan American World M a y 5. 1966. Airways, Inc. (Pan American), to all of This is to give notice under § 3.21 (j). its Latin American and Caribbean points Customs Regulations, that International DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR other than San Juan, P.R., and Mexico Paper Co., 220 East 42d Street, New Bureau of Land Management City, Mexico; the services of Delta Air York, N.Y., 10017, incorporated under the Lines, Inc. (Delta), to all of its Latin laws of the State of New York, has met [BLM 080779] American and Caribbean points except the qualification requirements of § 3.19 LOUISIANA San Juan; the services of Braniff Air (a) (4), Customs Regulations, as a citizen ways, Inc. (Braniff), to all of its Latin of the United States, and has filed the Notice of Proposed Withdrawal American and Caribbean points other certificate under oath and other papers than Mexico City, and Monterrey, M a y 5, 1966. required by § 3.21 (f ) and ( g ), Customs Mexico; and all services of Pan American Regulations. Therefore, a Certificate of On July 8, 1965, the Bureau of Sport- Grace Airways, Inc. (Panagra).1 Since Compliance, customs Form 1262, was Fisheries and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife the opening of these rates, data on the issued to the corporation by the Com Service, requested the withdrawal for unit cost trends in Latin American serv missioner of Customs on May 5, 1966, in use as a part of the Breton National ices have been assembled and studied and accordance with § 3.21 (i), Customs Reg Wildlife Refuge, La., of approximately informal mail rate conferences of the ulations. The certificate is valid for a 1,920 acres at and adjacent to the parties have been held.3 On the basis of period of 3 years from the date of its Chandeleur Island Lighthouse Reserva such conferences and the indicated cost issuance unless there first occurs a tion, Chandeleur Islands, St. Bernard trends in Latin American services, the change in corporate status requiring a Parish, La. It has been determined that Board has decided to propose a new Latin report under § 3.21(h) of the Customs the lands are suitable for wildlife refuge American service mail rate of 42.09 cents Regulations. purposes. per mail ton-mile to apply equally to all The text of the law is stated in Treas For a period of 30 days from the date four carriers’ services effective March 1, ury Decision 54693, dated September 23, of publication of this notice, all persons 1966. This represents an average reduc 1958. The regulations found necesary to who wish to submit comments, sugges tion of about 27.5 percent from the cur give effect to the law are stated in Treas tions, or objections in connection with rent rates, which vary between carriers. ury Decision 54827, dated April 2, 1959, the proposed withdrawal may present For the open rate period prior to March 1, and the form of the above-mentioned their views in writing to the undersigned 1966, the Board will propose to reestab customs form is prescribed in the ap officer of the Eastern States Land Office, lish the final rates in effect prior to the pendix to the aforesaid Treasury Deci Bureau of Land Management, Depart filing of the Postmaster General’s peti sion. ment of the Interior, Washington, D.C., tion. Vessels built in the United States and 20240. The service mail rates currently being The authorized officer will also prepare paid for Latin American services were owned by the corporation which are non a report for consideration by the Secre self-propelled or which, if self-propelled,, originally made effective January 1,1954, tary of the Interior who will determine for Pan American and Braniff, and April are of less than 500 gross tons shall be whether or not the lands will be with 8, 1954, for Delta and Panagra by Order entitled to documentation, as limited by drawn as requested by thé applicant E-9695, October 27, 1955. They were, the restrictions stated in section 883-1, agency. therefore, in effect as final rates for more title 46, United States Code. Vessels ex The determination of the Secretary than 10 years. on the application will be published in empt from documentation under § 3.5 The rates were not the same for all the F ederal R egister. A separate notice services. Pan American was paid a sys (a ), Customs Regulations, and owned by will be sent to each interested party of tem rate of 55.10 cents per ton-mile ex the corporation, which are named and record. cept that its rates to San Juan were identified on a valid Certificate of Com I f circumstances warrant, a public equalized with those applying to Eastern pliance, may be operated by the corpora hearing will be held at a convenient time under the domestic rate order. Braniff’s and place, which will be announced. tion in the coastwise trade, as limited by rate was 65.30 cents per ton-mile for all the restrictions stated in the aforesaid Joseph P. H agan, services except those to the Canal Zone Assistant Manager. where its rate was equalized with the statute. The vessels which are exempt 55.10 cents per ton-mile rate applying from documentation and named and [F.R. Doc. 66-5103; Filed May 10, 1966; 8:46 a.m.] to Pan American. Delta and Panagra identified on the above-mentioned Cer were both given system rates of 65.30 tificate of Compliance are the following: cents per ton-mile, equal to the rate paid a. Barge Nos. 106 and 108, built In 1937. b. Barge Nos. 119 and 121-123, built in CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD 1 Since the opening of the rate, Mackey Airlines was granted an exemption Order 1938. [Docket No. 15381; E-23642] E-22945, Nov. 29, 1965, to carry airmail c. Barge Nos. 127 and 132-134, built in LATIN AMERICAN SERVICE MAIL between Florida and the Bahamas and it was 1940. given a temporary rate, Order E-23319, Mar. 3, d. Barge Nos. 137, 139-140, and 141-145, RATE PROCEEDING 1966, under the former Latin American order. Its services would be covered by the dispo built in 1947. M a y 5, 1966. sition proposed herein. e. Barge Nos. 146-151, built in 1950. Latin American service mail rate pro 2 Delta elected not to attend such confer f. Barge Nos. 201-206, built in 1954. ceeding; statement of provisional find ences because of the very limited impact that g. Barge Nos. 207-216, built in 1955. ings and conclusions by the Board. any action herein would have on its revenues.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91 — WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6913

Braniff for all of its services other than calendar 1954. A comparison of the 1954 it carried a total of 6,458,600 revenue those to the Canal Zone. revenue ton-mile costs used in E-9695, ton-miles of mail in its Latin American The Latin American service rates are the rate order, and the revenue ton-mile Division. O f this total, it is estimated the last of the international service rates costs computed from Form 41 data for the United States-San Juan mail, which to be reviewed recently. Service rates the 12 months ending September 30, takes a current rate of 32.12 cents per for transatlantic and transpacific serv 1965, is set forth below: ton-mile, accounted for 2,015,000 reve ices were initially established at about nue ton-miles or 31 percent of Pan the same time as the Latin American 12 months, Percent American’s total. In addition Houston- rates but were recently reduced follow 1954 Sept. 30, reduc Mexico City mail taking a rate of 36.05 ing informal conferences similar to those 1965 tion cents per ton-mile accounted for another employed here, E-21514, November 19, estimated 6,000 revenue ton-miles. In cents cents 1964. Transatlantic rates were reduced Pan American______48.80 38.49 21. i the case of Braniff, it is estimated that by 25 percent to a level of 40 cents per Panagra______72.66 ' 48.42 32.4 more than 4 percent of its total of mail ton-mile. The former transpacific Braniff______63.83 44.63 30.1 Delta— ...... — 66.84 41.00 39.7 91,000 revenue ton-miles in Latin Amer rates varied in the case of Pan American ican service are accounted for by San according to routings and a composite Weighted aver- Antonio-Mexico City mail taking a rate age------53.52 39.93 25.39 reduction in that carrier’s transpacific of 36.44 cents per ton-mile. Delta’s rates of approximately 34 percent was Latin American operations are relatively effected. The rate for Northwest Air The costs set forth above are reported small and its weighting would have little lines, Inc., was reduced by 22.5 percent. costs with depreciation adjusted to con impact on an overall weighted average. Currently, all transpacific priority mail form to the Board’s policy on deprecia However, it is estimated that the great services are compensated at a uniform tion expense, and with passenger service majority of the revenue ton-miles of rate of 36 cents per mail ton-mile. and promotional and sales expense ex mail carried by it in its Latin American The former Latin American rates were cluded. General and administrative ex services is accounted for by New Orleans- constructed in basically the same way penses have not been adjusted to exclude San Juan mail which takes the domestic as the prior transatlantic and transpa that part associated with the exclusions rate. cific rates. The ton-mile costs of the just noted. The weighted average ton- Taking account of all the factors dis carriers operating in the Latin American mile cost with such associated general cussed above, the Board has tentatively area were compared to the average ton- and administrative expense eliminated is concluded that a uniform Latin Ameri mile costs of the domestic Big Pour car 39.09 cents. This is 27 percent below the can service mail rate of 42.09 cents per riers.2* The resulting ratio was applied revenue ton-mile cost used in E-9695 ton-mile for services to all points other to the 37.4 cents per ton-mile mail cost which, however, included total reported than to the stub ends is fair and reason of the Big Four. Because Pan Ameri general and administrative expenses. able. The Board recognizes that this rate can’s revenue ton-mile costs were sub It has also been concluded that the appears to be acceptable to both the De stantially below those of the other three new rate should be uniform for all car partment and the carriers despite their U.S. flag carriers engaged in Latin Amer riers, and thus the present structure divergent interests. In addition, it is ican services, separate comparisons were under which higher rates are applicable our judgment that a rate of 42.09 cents made to Pan American’s cost and the to the higher cost carriers would not be per ton-mile is well within the zone of average costs of Braniff, Delta and Pan- preserved. While Pan American’s unit reasonableness on the basis of all the agra. By this means it was determined costs are moderately below those of the considerations that have heretofore been that Pan American’s Latin American other Latin American carriers, the dis used in establishing service mail rates. Division should yield on the average 47.41 parity is not nearly as great as it was in The rate formula proposed is the same cents per mail ton-mile. This was 1954. In 1954 the computed revenue ton- as that which now applies to transatlan achieved by giving Pan American a rate mile cost of Pan American was between tic and transpacific services under Order of 55.10 cents per ton-mile for all serv 67 and 76 percent of the costs computed E-21514. It thus embodies provisions ices except those to San Juan, together for the other three carriers; today the authorizing voluntary equalization of with rates of 34.31 cents per ton-mile range is from 80.5 to 93.1 percent, a dis mail rates. It also would apply the rate and 36.54 cents per ton-mile for its serv parity that is not substantially gréater to standard mileages. However, since ices between New York and San Juan, than that which exists in other areas standard mileages are currently being and Miami and San Juan, respectively. where uniform rates apply. applied which will be revised July 1, The rate for the other three carriers was The current reported revenue ton-mile established at a level that would return 1966, little benefit would be derived from costs excluding passenger service ex tabulating a complete list of such mile them their average cost taking account pense, promotional and selling expense, of the fact that a lower rate for Braniflf’s ages merely for application dining the and the general and administrative ex remainder of the fiscal year. Accord Miami-Balboa services equal to the 55.10 pense associated with such exclusions for cents per ton-mile applying to Pan Amer ingly, we will provide that the rates will the four carriers party to this proceeding be applied to the mileages currently be ican’s competitive services would have are: to be established. ing used for computing Latin American Cents per service mail pay. Such mileages are The new rates proposed in this order ton-mile Pan American______* ______37. 74 known to all parties. Effective July 1, reflect a level agreed to by the Depart 1966, a tabulation of new standard mile ment and the carriers as a basis for P an agra------__ 46. 89 B ra n iff------43. 51 ages will be established to apply dur informally disposing of this proceeding ing the next fiscal year. after lengthy discussions in the informal Delta ______40. 55 In addition, we will propose amend mail rate conference. While neither the Weighted average______39. 09 ment of the domestic rate order (E- Department nor the carriers have con ceded their right to espouse other cost These costs are reported on the basis 22512) so as to authorize carriers sub ject only to that order to join in the ing theories in future proceedings, for of the carriers’ entire Latin American equalization of Latin American service purposes of obtaining an informal dis operations. Some Latin American serv position at this time a consensus de ices will, however, be covered by the mail rates. Also proposed is an amend veloped at conference in favor of basing lower domestic rate, e.g., New York-San ment making Braniff’s service to Aca the new rate on current revenue ton-mile Juan. Thus, the rates applying to the pulco subject to the domestic rate since costs. Thus, the focal point of these other routes must be somewhat higher service to that point is also authorized discussions was the downward trend of than average ton-mile costs in order to American, Eastern and Western, the en costs per revenue ton-mile in Latin compensate for the dilution in overall tire systems of which are subject to the American services since the establish system yield attributable to the lower domestic rate order. Another amend ment which would make Pan American’s ment of the former mail rates in 1955, rates applicable on routes covered by the which were based on reported costs for service to the Virgin Islands subject to domestic service rate.. the domestic rate is also proposed. During the 12 months ending Septem While there are no direct services be 28 American, Eastern, TWA, and United. ber 30,1965, Pan American reported that tween the continental United States and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6914 NOTICES the Virgin Islands competitive with Pan Mexico City, and the Canal Zone, on the Origin and destination of mail ship American’s, the effective rate available to other. Such rates shall be applied in ments. As used herein “point of origin” the Department by routing such mail to accordance with the terms and condi means the point at which the carrier first San Juan at the domestic rate and then tions stated in Order E-9695, October 27, enplanes the mail shipment after receipt from San Juan to the Virgin Islands via 1955. thereof from a Postal Administration or Caribbean Atlantic at that carrier’s $1.38 2. For the period on and after Marchits representatives, from another rate per ton-mile rate would be significantly 1,1966, a rate of 42.09 cents per ton-mile making division of the same carrier, below the 42.09 cents per ton-mile Latin for the Latin American services of the operations of which division are not American rate that would otherwise ap Braniff International Airways, Inc., Delta encompassed herein, or from another ply to Pan American. Pan American has Air Lines, Inc., Pan American World carrier; and “ point of destination” means agreed to provide the service at the Airways, Inc., Pan American-Grace Air the point at which the carrier deplanes domestic rate. ways, Inc., and Mackey Airlines, Inc., the mail shipment for delivery to a Postal Conclusion. On the basis of the fore other than those between the continental Administration or its representatives, to going, the Board has tentatively con United States on the one hand, and San a separate ratemaking division of the cluded that Order E-22512, August 6, Juan, P.R., the Virgin Islands, and same carrier, the operations of which di 1965, should be amended as follows: Mexico City, Monterrey, and Acapulco, vision are not encompassed herein, or to (1) On page 5, line 3, the following Mexico, on the other. This rate shall another carrier. Equalization of rates— Election to language should be inserted between be applied in accordance with the terms equalize. Any air carrier, or, pursuant to “June 19,1965” and “ are set forth below.” and conditions set forth below. Mail ton-miles. The mail ton-miles agreement, any two or more air carriers and over their routes between points within for each shipment of mail shall be based providing service on an interline or inter the 48 contiguous states and the District of upon the standard mileage established change basis, may, by notice, elect to Columbia, on the one hand, and the Virgin establish a reduced charge for the car Islands and Acapulco, Mexico, on the other herein for service between the points of hand in effect on or after (date of final origin and destination of each shipment.® riage of mail between: order); Standard mileage. The standard mile (a) Any point where a U.S. Post Office age for each pair of points shall be as set Department international exchange of (2) On page 7 under “ 4. Equalization forth in Appendix B to this order.4 fice is located8 and any other point to of Rates” paragraph (a) line 3, insert Changes in standard mileage. The which such international exchange office the words “Latin American,” between standard mileages set forth in Appendix is authorized to dispatch air mail, or the words “including” and “ transatlan B to this order shall remain in effect (b) Foreign points, tic” ; throughout the period this rate order is equal to the charge then in effect for (3) A t the end of footnote 2 on page 7 in effect: Provided, however, That at service between such points by any other add the following: any time the Board may institute a pro air carrier or air carriers.® Such offices for the Latin American area are ceeding, and any carrier subject to this Notice of election to equalize rate. An currently located in Chicago, Houston, Los order and/or the Postmaster General, original and three copies of each notice Angeles, Miami, New Orleans, New York, may make application to the Board for of election and agreement to equalize Washington, D.C., San Juan, P.R., and Char establishment of standard mileages to shall be filed with the Board and a copy lotte Amalie, Frederiksted, and Christian- a new point: And provided further, how thereof shall be served upon the Post sted, V.I.; ever, That once each fiscal year the Board master General and each carrier pro (4) On page 8 line 2 of the first para may institute a proceeding and any car viding on-line or connecting service be graph under (c) insert the words “Latin rier subject to this order and/or the tween the stated points. Such notices American,” between the words “ ihclud- Postmaster General may make applica shall contain a complete description of ing” and “ transatlantic” ; ' tion to the Board for revision of any the reduced charge being established, the (5) On page 8 line 2 of paragraph (d) standard mileage effective July 1 of such routing over which it applies and how it insert the words “ Latin American,” be fiscal year. Such applications will not be is constructed and shall similarly de tween the words “ including” and “ trans regarded as reopening the rate. Appli scribe the charge being equalized with. atlantic”. cations provided for above shall be clearly Any equalized rate established pursu Also on the basis of the foregoing, the entitled “Application for (New) (Re ant to this order shall be effective for the Board tentatively finds that the fair and vised) Standard Mileage,” shall con electing carrier or carriers as of the date reasonable rates of compensation to be tain a clear and concise statement of the of filing of the notice or such later date paid the carriers named below by the requested standard mileage or standard as may be specified in the notice, until Postmaster General, pursuant to the pro mileage revision and the facts upon which such election is terminated. Elections visions of section 406 of the Federal Avia such request is based, and shall in all may be terminated by any electing car tion Act of 1958, for the transportation of other respects conform to the appli rier upon 10 days’ notice filed with the Board and served upon the Postmaster mail by aircraft over their respective cable requirements of the rules of prac General and each carrier providing on routes as described below, the facilities tice. used and useful therefor, and the serv In establishing standard mileages to a line or connecting service between the ices connected therewith, are as follows: new point, the Board will consider the stated points. Division of equalized rates. In case of 1. For the period July 1,1964, throughroutings of flights to such point and the number of flights required by the postal equalization of rates by agreement, the February 28, 1966, a rate of 55.10 cents agreement shall provide for the proration per ton-mile for the Latin American service. In establishing revised stand ard mileages, the Board will consider the of the mail compensation between par services of Pan American World Airways, ticipating carriers on the basis of the Inc., other than those between the con effect of changes in airport location, mail flow, and flight routings reflected in relative compensation which w ould tinental United States, on the one hand, otherwise be payable to each carrier in and San Juan, P.R., and Mexico City, the carriers’ general schedules dining Mexico, on the other; a rate of 55.10 the first seven days of the month im cents per ton-mile for the services of mediately preceding the July 1 effective BSuch offices for the Latin American area Braniff International Airways, Inc., be date of such revision. are: Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, tween the continental United States, on New Orleans, New York, Washington, D.C., the one hand, and the Canal Zone, on 3 No tabulation of standard mileages isSan Juan, P.R., and Charlotte Amalie, the other; a rate of 55.10 cents per ton- being attached to this order when initially Fredericksted, and Christiansted, V.I. mile for all services of Mackey Airlines, issued. The standard mileages now being * The domestic multielement service mail Inc.; a rate of 65.30 cents per ton-mile used twcompute service mail pay, which are rate is being amended herein to permit the for all of the Latin American services of known to both the Department and all af air carriers covered by that rate to partici fected carriers, will continue to be used until pate with carriers covered by this order in Braniff International Airways, Inc., the end of fiscal year 1966. An appendix es rate equalizations with respect to mail ship Delta Air Lines, Inc., and Pan American- tablishing new standard mileages to apply ments transported between certain US. Grace Airways, Inc., other than those during fiscal year 1967 will be published by points and other points subject to the provi between the continental United States, July 1,1966. sions of both the domestic and international on the one hand, and San Juan, PR ., * See footnote 3 above. service rates.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6915

the absence of such an equalization. In payable if the services were performed 3. Further procedures herein shall be the absence of an agreement among car under voluntary equalization agreement. in accordance with the rules of practice, riers for equalization of rates for inter The compensation provided herein 14 CFR Part 302, and if there is any ob line or interchange shipments between a shall be in lieu of, and not in addition jection to the rates or to the other find stated pair of points, any carrier (or two to, the service mail compensation here ings and conclusions specified in the or more carriers jointly) may, by notice, tofore received by each carrier for mail Statement, notice thereof shall be filed elect to receive as its portion of the total transported on and after July 1, 1964. within 10 days, and, if notice is filed, compensation for each shipment the The foregoing rates do not apply to the written answer and supporting docu amount remaining after subtracting transportation of first-class and other ments shall be filed within 30 days, after from such total compensation the com preferential mail (other than airmail and the date of service of this order. pensation due the other carrier or car air parcel post) for which a separate 4. If notice of objection is not filed riers involved (nonelecting carriers). rate has been, or hereafter may be, within 10 days, or if notice is filed and an Such total compensation shall be com established. swer is not filed within 30 days, after puted on the basis of the lowest rate An appropriate order will be entered. service of this order, all persons shall be then in effect for service between the Murphy, Chairman, Murphy, Vice deemed to have waived the right to a stated pair of points for any carrier or Chairman, Minetti, Gillilland and Adams, hearing and all other procedural steps carriers. The compensation due the Members, concurred in the above State short of a final decision by the Board, nonelecting carrier or carriers shall be ment. and the Board may enter an order fixing that otherwise applicable to the point- O rder To S h o w C a u se the rates and incorporating the findings to-point service it actually provides. In and conclusions specified in the State those instances where there is a non Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics ment. Board at its office in Washington, D.C., electing carrier or carriers involved in 5. I f notice of objection and answer on the 5th day of May 1966. providing the through service and two are filed, all issues going to the estab or more carriers elect to receive payment Latin American service mail rate case, lishment of the rates shall be open, in under this provision, the total payment Docket 15381; domestic service mail accordance with Rule 319 of the rules due such electing carriers shall be pro rates, Docket 15726. of practice, except as limited in prehear rated by them on the basis of the rela The Board, having considered all of ing conference. tive compensation which would other the information and data set forth or 6. This order and the Statement of wise be payable to each of them in the specifically referred to in the Statement Provisional Findings and Conclusions set absence of the provisions of this para of Provisional Findings and Conclusions forth above shall be served upon the graph. (Statement), which is set forth above parties enumerated in paragraphs 1 and Divisions of equalized rates prescribed and incorporated herein, and having on 2 above. bys the Board. In the event that any the basis thereof made the provisional carrier is unable to enter into an agree findings and conclusions and determined This order will be published in the ment with any other carrier to transport the rates specified in the Statement: F ederal R e g ist e r . mail between any stated points at a re I t is ordered, That: By the Civil Aeronautics Board. duced rate it may file an application 1. All interested persons, and particu with the Board requesting it to deter larly Braniff Airways, Inc., Delta Air [ s e a l ] H arold R. S a n d e r s o n , mine and fix a different method of Lines, Inc., Mackey Airlines, Inc., Pan Secretary. apportioning the total compensation for American-Grace Airways, Inc., Pan [F.R. Doc. 66-5132; Filed, May 10, 1966; each such shipment of mail between the American World Airways, Inc., and the 8:48 a.m.] participating carriers. Such applica Postmaster General, are directed to show tions shall not be deemed to reopen the cause why the Board should not adopt mail rates fixed by this order. An the foregoing proposed findings and con original and 19 copies of such an applica clusions and fix, determine and publish FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY tion shall be filed. Applications filed the final rates specified in the Statement pursuant to this paragraph shall con as the fair and reasonable rates of com [OE Docket No. 66-EA-2] form generally to the provisions of the pensation to be paid to Braniff Airways, WMAL-TV AND WTOP-TV rules of practice governing the filing of Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Mackey Air petitions in mail rate cases. Within 7 lines, Inc., Pan American-Grace Airways, Affirmation of Determination of No days after the application is served, any Inc., and Pan American World Airways, Hazard to Air Navigation party may file an answer in support of or Inc., for the transportation of mail by in opposition to the application, together aircraft, the facilities used and useful The Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) with any documentary material upon therefor, and the services connected was notified by FAA Form 117 dated which it relies. Any order upon applica therewith over their systems as specified November 15,1965, that the Washington tion filed pursuant to this paragraph in the Statement. Post Co. (W TO P-TV ) and the Evening shall be effective no earlier than the date 2. All interested persons, and par Star Broadcasting Co. (W M AL-TV) of filing of the application with the ticularly American Airlines, Inc., Con jointly proposed to construct an antenna Board. tinental Air Lines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, tower in Silver Spring, Md., at latitude In reviewing such application, the Inc., National Airlines, Inc., Northeast 39°00'52" N., longitude 77°03'02/' W. Board will consider, among other per Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., The overall height of the structure tinent factors, the need for the proposed Western Air Lines, Inc., Airlift Interna would be 1,549 feet above mean sea level service, the historical participation of tional, Inc., The Flying Tiger Lines, Inc., (AMSL) (1,218 feet have ground level electing carrier or carriers in the trans The Slick Corp., Allegheny Airlines, Inc., (AGL)). portation of mail between such stated Bonanza Air Lines, Inc., Central Airlines, On January 28, 1966, the Eastern Re points, the amount of absorption re Inc., Frontier Airlines, Inc., Lake Central gional Office of the Federal Aviation quired, and the grounds for refusal by Airlines, Inc., Mohawk Airlines, Inc., Agency issued a determination that the the carrier or carriers to enter into an North Central Airlines, Inc., Ozark Air proposed structure would not be a hazard equalization agreement. After hearing Lines, Inc., Pacific Air Lines, Inc., Pied to air navigation (Aeronautical Study the carriers concerned, either orally or mont Aviation, Inc., Southern Airways, No. EA-OE-65—600). The determina in writing, in those cases where it deems Inc., Trans-Texas Airways, Inc., West tion disclosed that: such action appropriate the Board will by Coast Airlines, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., order prescribe the method for appor Delta Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, 1. The proposed tower would require tioning the total compensation between Inc., Pan American World Airways, Inc., an increase from 2,000 feet to 2,500 feet such carriers, but in no event shall the Trans World Airlines, Inc., and the Post of: carrier or carriers which refuse to enter master General are directed to show a. The minimum en route altitude into an agreement to equalize compen cause why the Board should not amend (MEA) on Federal airway Victor 265 be sation be required to accept less than the Order E-22512, August 6, 1965, as pro tween the Beltsville and Riverdale In compensation which would have been posed in the Statement. tersections;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 3T, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6916 NOTICES

b. An altitude of the Andrews Air politan Area; the tower constitutes in As of March 11, 1966, the two other Force Base, Bethesda 5 Standard Instru efficient use of the navigable airspace; Washington TV stations, W RC-TV and ment Departure (SID) route; and, the MEA on V265, the transition altitude W TTG -TV, have agreed to collocate c. The AL-443-ADF-2 transition alti between the Unity Intersection and the their antennas on the proposed tower. tude from the Unity Intersection to the Georgetown RBN, and an Andrews Air In addition, it is understood that cer Georgetown RBN. Force Base SID altitude would be raised tain UHF stations in the Washington 2. The proposed tower would not ex affecting IF R traffic; and in general, the area have also agreed to relocate on ceed obstruction standards in Federal tower creates an adverse effect upon VFR the proposed tower. The collocation of Aviation Regulations (FAR), 14 CFR traffic, especially during periods of re several broadcasting stations in the same Part 77, as applied to the Washington duced visibility. area, and particularly on one structure, National Airport or any other airport. The material developed in the regional is deemed to be in the public interest. 3. If the proposed tower receives full study as well as the IF R and VFR flight Based on the review, it is concluded approval, the existing W M AL-TV and procedures in the Washington area were the determination issued by the Agency’s W TO P-TV tower heights would be re reviewed. Eastern Region reflected properly the duced to a height satisfactory to the The review confirmed the region’s effect the tower would have on aero FAA. findings and the structure will have no nautical operations, procedures, or mini 4. WTOP-TV will withdraw its pro greater adverse effect upon flight opera mum flight altitudes. Accordingly, it is posal to increase the height of its exist tions in the Washington area than were the finding of the Agency that the pro ing tower to 1,049 feet A3VJSL. acknowledged in the determination. posed structure would have no substan 5. The proposed tower would be con A VFR traffic survey of the Washing tial adverse effect upon aeronautical structed to support the antennas of other ton, D.C., area conducted during the lat operations in the Washington, D.C., area television stations provided sufficient ter part of 1963 indicated that aircraft and the finding of “ no hazard to air notice is given to permit engineering proceeded VFR from the immediate navigation” issued by the Eastern Region changes. vicinity of their base use radio for guid is affirmed. 6. Some adverse effect on the handling ance and traffic information; aircraft Therefore, pursuant to the authority of IF R traffic would result if the proposed passing near the Washington National delegated to me by the Administrator (30 tower is constructed. Airport, Dulles International Airport, F.R. 13623), the Determination of No 7. The adverse effect of the proposed and Friendship International Airport Hazard to Air Navigation issued by the tower versus advantages of lowering or control zones contact the appropriate Eastern Region on January 28, 1966, is removing tall towers from a location facilities for VFR radar information affirmed, effective this date. service or traffic information; aircraft close to Washington National Airport Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 4, and the collocation of antennas more flying VFR over the city of Washington distant from the airport must be weighed. maintain an altitude of 2,000 feet or 1966. W il l ia m E. M o r g an , higher; helicopter flights will not be af 8. The aeronautical study performed Acting Director, Air Traffic Service. in relation to the proposal disclosed: fected by the proposed tower. The study a. The altitude changes required, as also indicated that the area which would [F.R. Doc. 66-5094; Filed, May 10, 1966; stated above, would result in some have the least impact upon IF R and VFR 8:45 a.m.] changes in air traffic control handling of aeronautical operations in the Washing aircraft; however, radar is primarily ton area would be approximately 8 miles used in handling of arriving and depart north of prohibited area P-56. The pro ing aircraft permitting flexibility in air posed site is approximately 7 miles north FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS traffic control. of P-56. b. The MEA could be retained through The VFR traffic study also disclosed COMMISSION the use of standard radar separation by that a minimal amount of VFR traffic vectoring aircraft from the tower; no transverses the area of the proposed site. [Docket Nos. 16577, 16578; FCC 66M-643] substantial increase in time or distance The proposed tower constitutes effi flown by aircraft operating in this area cient use of the navigable airspace since CENTURY BROADCASTING CO., INC., would result. approximately six antennas will be con AND RKO GENERAL, INC. c. The proposed tower is located in a centrated on a single tower in a small Order Regarding Procedural Dates , built-up area which influences the alti area rather than on individual structures tude of VFR aircraft traversing this site. of varying heights spread over a large In re applications of Century Broad d. The site is in proximity of the Capi area with corresponding sponsors vying casting Co., Inc., Memphis, Tenn., Docket tal Beltway which traverses built-up for transmission supremacy. No. 16577, File No. BPH-4785; RKO Gen areas and does not provide a route be The required MEA increase on V265, eral, Inc., Memphis, Tenn., Docket No. tween any airports. and the Andrews Air Force Base SID alti 16578, File No. BPH-4788; for construc e. No evidence was disclosed that any tude would result in some change in air tion permits. substantial number of VFR aircraft use traffic control handling of aircraft on At a prehearing conference held today, this highway for navigational guidance. these routes; however, the use of radar it was agreed that the procedural steps f. The proposed tower would have no vectoring should negate, to some extent, set forth below will be taken on the dates adverse effect on other aeronautical the anticipated adverse effect on the indicated: handling of traffic in this area. The operations, procedures, or minimum July 6, 1966, preliminary exchange of direct flight altitudes. Unity Intersection was previously deleted for other aeronautical reasons. presentations. 9. The proposal conforms to the an August 9, 1966, final exchange of direct tenna grouping concept with its attend The military representatives inter posed no objection to the proposal, even presentations. ant long range benefits to aviation. August 16,1966, notification of witnesses. On February 24, 1966, the Aircraft though an increase in the Andrews Air September 1, 1966, hearing (continued from Force Base SID altitude would be re Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) June 8, 1966). . quired, in view of the overall advantages petitioned the Administrator for a review to be derived. The Army representative So ordered, This 4th day of May 1966. of the determination pursuant to § 77.37, endorsed the stressing of the proposed FAR. On March 11, 1966, notice was tower to accommodate additional Released: May 5, 1966. given that the petition was granted and antennas. F ederal C ommunications a review would be conducted on the basis The region’s study disclosed that the C o m m is s io n , of written materials (31 F.R. 4633). Capital Beltway does not provide a route [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , The petition claims there is a high between any airports and there is no Secretary. concentration of IF R and VFR traffic, evidence that any substantial number of especially in the lower regions of the VFR aircraft use this highway for navi [F.R. Doc. 66-5137; Filed, May 10, 1966; airspace, in the Washington Metro gational guidance. 8:48 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6917

[Docket Nos. 16584,16585; PCC 66M-637] evidence, they shall exchange exhibits posals is required because Northwestern CITY INDEX CORP. AND on rebuttal by July 12 and a rebuttal Indiana Radio Co., Inc., proposes to hearing (if necessary) will be held on duplicate its companion AM station 48% TELE/MAC OF JACKSON July 19, 1966: hours per week or about 36.11 percent of Order Continuing Prehearing I t is ordered, This 4th day of May the time, while the other applicants pro Conference 1966, that the date of hearing is changed pose independent operations. Therefore, from June 9 to June 28, 1966, at 10 ajn. programing evidence will be admissible In re applications of City Index Corp., and the foregoing schedule will be ob under the standard comparative issue. Jackson, Miss., Docket No. 16584, Pile served. 4. Porter County Broadcasting Corp., No. BPCT-3530; John M. McLendon, Released: May 5, 1966. licensee of standard broadcast station trading as Tele/Mac of Jackson, Jack- W A Y K in Valparaiso, has requested son, Miss., Docket No. 16585, pile No. F ederal C ommunications waiver of § 73.210(a) (2) of the Commis BPCT-3647; for construction permit for C o m m is s io n , sion’s rules to permit it to establish its new television broadcast station (Chan [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , main studio outside the corporate limits nel 16). Secretary. of Valparaiso, at a point other than the The Hearing Examiner having under [F.R. Doc. 66-5139; Piled, May 10, 1966; transmitter site. This location (already consideration a motion filed April 25, 8:48 a.m.] used for the studio of its AM station) is 1966, on behalf of City Index Corp. re on Sager Road, a main thoroughfare, questing that the prehearing conference 1.7 miles from the corporate limits of in the above-entitled proceeding now [Docket Nos. 16625-16628; PCC 66-411] Valparaiso. According to Porter County, scheduled for May 18, 1966, be held on NORTHWESTERN INDIANA BROAD this location is easily accessible to all May 31,1966, or on some other date mu CASTING CORP., ET AL. residents of Valparaiso and already in tually convenient to all parties; and cludes ample parking space and facili It appearing that the reason for the Order Designating Applications for ties for expansion to include the pro requested extension is the fact that coun Consolidated Hearing on Stated posed FM station. Porter County also sel for City Index Corp. will be out of issues has stated that the savings made possible the United States during the period April by the reduction in operating costs will 23 to May 25, 1966; and In re applications of Northwestern be passed on to the public in the form of It further appearing that counsel for Indiana Broadcasting Corp., Valparaiso, better quality programing. We believe Tele/Mac of Jackson and Chief, Broad Ind., Docket No. 16625, File No. BPH- that Porter County has provided ade cast Bureau have no objection to the 4110, requests: 105.5 me, No. 288; 3 kw; quate justification, and § 73.210(a) (2) extension to May 31,1966, and good cause 300 feet; William H. Wardle, Robert A. will be waived in the event of a grant of for granting ’the motion having been Jones, and F. Patrick Nugent, doing busi its application. shown; ness as Valparaiso Broadcasting Co., 5. Except as indicated below, the ap I t is ordered, This the 5th day of May Valparaiso, Ind., Docket No. 16626, File plicants are qualified to construct and 1966, that the motion is granted, and No. BPH-4147, requests: 105.5 me, No. operate as proposed. However, because the prehearing conference now scheduled 288; 3 kw; 268 feet; Porter County of their mutually exclusivity, the Com for May 18, 1966 is continued to May 31, Broadcasting Corp., Valparaiso, Ind., mission is unable to make the statutory 1966, beginning at 9 a.m. in the offices of Docket No. 16627, File No. BPH-4972, finding that a grant of the applications the Commission, Washington, D.C. requests: 105.5 me, No. 288; 3 kw; 300 would serve the public interest, conven Released: May 5, 1966. feet; Northwestern Indiana Radio Co., ience and necessity and is of the opinion Inc., Valparaiso, Ind., Docket No. 16628, that the applications must be designated F ederal C ommunications File No. BPH-5045, requests: 105.5 me, for hearing on the issues set forth below. C o m m is s io n , No. 288; 3 kw; 300 feet; for construction 6. I t is ordered, That pursuant to sec [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , permits. tion 309(e) of the Communications Act Secretary. At a session of the Federal Communi of 1934, as amended, the applications are [F.R. Doc. 66-5138; Piled, May 10, 1966; cations Commission held at its offices in designated for hearing in a consolidated 8:48 a.m.] Washington, D.C., on the 4th day of proceeding at a time and place to be May 1966; specified in a subsequent Order, upon the 1. The Commission has before it for following issues: [Docket Nos. 16572, 16573; PCC 66M-642] consideration the above captioned and 1. To determine which of the proposals COSMOPOLITAN ENTERPRISES, INC., described applications which are mutu would better serve the public interest. AND H. H. HUNTLEY ally exclusive in that operation by the 2. To determine in the light of the evi applicants as proposed would cause mu dence adduced pursuant to the foregoing Order Continuing Hearing tually destructive interference. issues which of the applications should 2. Data submitted by the applicants be granted. In re applications of Cosmopolitan indicate that there would be a significant 7. I t is further ordered, That, to avail Enterprises, Inc., Edna, Tex., Docket difference in the size of the populations themselves of the opportunity to be No. 16572, File No. BP-16347; H. H. which would receive service from the heard, the applicants pursuant to § 1.221 Huntley, Yoakum, Tex., Docket No. various proposals. The population fig (c) of the Commission’s rules, in person 16573, File No. BP—16570; for construc ures vary from a low of 44,987 to a high tion permits. or by attorney, shall, within 20 days of of 270,538. Consequently, for the pur the mailing of this order file with the The Hearing Examiner having under poses of comparison, the area and popu Commission in triplicate, a written ap consideration the rescheduling of date lations within the respective 1 mv/m pearance stating an intention to appear for commencement of hearing; contours together with the availability on the date fixed for the hearing and It appearing that a prehearing con of other FM services of at least 1 mv/m present evidence on the issues specified in ference was held on May 4,1966, at which in such areas will be considered under this order. time the problems of the case were dis the standard comparative issue for the cussed and the following schedule was 8. I t is further ordered, That the ap purposes of determining whether a com plicants herein shall, pursuant to sec agreed upon with the approval of the parative preference should accrue to any Examiner: tion 311(a)(2) of the Communications of the applicants. Act of 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of June 9, 1966, exchange of direct cases in 3. As we stated in the Reising case, the Commission’s rules, give notice of the cluding all engineering. 1 FCC 2d 1082, 6 R.R. 2d 431 (1965), hearing, either individually or, if feasi June 20, 1966, exchange of any supplemental programing evidence would not normally exhibits and at this time requests for ble and consistent with the rules jointly, witnesses must be made. be admissible under the standard com within the time and in the manner pre June 28, 1966, commencement of hearing. parative issue, absent a finding regard scribed in such rule, and shall advise ing a material and substantial differ the Commission of the publication of It further appearing that if any of ence between the proposals. In this case, such notice as required by § 1.594(g) of the parties intend to produce rebuttal consideration of the programing pro the rules.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6918 NOTICES

9. I t is further ordered, That in theTelegraph Co., New York, N.Y., defend ent UHF stations, to provide a program event of a grant of the Porter County ant; Docket No. 16043. service that will make it a meaningful Broadcasting Corp. application,, the per 1. The Commission has before it a competitor to VHF stations in the same mit shall contain the following condi formal complaint filed June 3, 1965 by market without a network affiliation; tion: § 73.210(a) (2) of the Commission’s Sports Network, Inc. (complainant), that the requirement that program trans rules is waived to permit the establish against the American Telephone & Tele mission service be purchased at the ment of the main studio outside the cor graph Company (A.T. & T.) regarding present 8-hour minimum rate imposes porate limits of Valparaiso, Ind., on Sager charges of A.T. & T. for certain audio such a heavy financial drain oi. the pro Road, 1.7 miles south of Valparaiso. and video program transmission services motion of a new network organization as provided under A.T. &- T. Tariff F.C.C. virtually to preclude such formation and Released: May 6, 1966. Nos. 198 and 216; an answer to the com this impedes the establishment of new F ederal C ommunications plaint filed by A.T. & T. on July 9, 1965, stations which in turn impedes the for C o m m is s io n ,1 accompanied by A.T. & T.’s Motion to mation of network organizations; and [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , Dismiss the complaint; an opposition that the present rate schedule is unjust Secretary. to A.T. & T.’s Motion to Dismiss and a and unreasonable because it tends to reply to A.T. & T.’s answer filed by com lessen competition and restrain com [F.R. Doc. 66-5140; Filed, May 10, 1966; merce by making it extremely difficult 8:49 a.m.] plainant on July 22, 1965; and A.T. & T.’s reply to such opposition filed August 3, for a new television network to get 1965. started and for new television stations [Docket Nos. 16536,16537; FCC 66M-648] Summary of pleadings. 2. The com to begin and continue operation, in vio plaint alleges that complainant is an lation of sections 313 and 314 of the Act. GORDON SHERMAN AND OMICRON originator of telecasts of sports events 4. Complainant also alleges that the TELEVISION CORP. distributed to a network of TV stations; feasible and fair charge by A.T. & T. that under the provisions of the tariffs in would be on the basic unit of 3 hours, Order Continuing Hearing question a minimum contract rate of rather than 8; that the just and reason In re applications of Gordon Sherman, $39.50 per airline mile per month for a able rate which would not discourage Orlando, Fla., Docket No. 16536, File No. continuous 8-hour period each day is im competition in the broadcast industry BPCT-3529; Omicron Television Corp., posed by A.T. & T. for interexchange would be approximately three-eighths Orlando, Fla., Docket No. 16537, File No. channels utilized for audio and video pro of the current rate of $39.50 or $14.82 BPCT-3596; for construction permit for gram transmission; that for the 12- per airline mile based on 3 hours per day new television broadcast station (Chan month period prior to the filing of the of service per month which 3 hours need nel 35). complaint, complainant paid defendant not be consecutive to one another; that As a result of agreements reached on approximately $566,749 for such chan under such a flexible monthly contract the record of a prehearing conference nels; that notwithstanding that it sel a new network would not be saddled with held this date in the above-entitled dom uses that service for more than 3 a block of contract hours for which it matter: It is ordered, This 5th day of hours per day, it is nevertheless com had no use and this, in turn, would chan May 1966, that: pelled under the tariffs to pay A.T. & T. nel money, otherwise invested on unused 1. Exchange of engineering and finan as though it were using the facilities for facilities, into additional programs for cial data to be accomplished by May 26, an 8-hour daily period; that this treat UHF stations, and this, in turn, would 1966, ment is unfair, discriminatory, and un enable UHF stations to command a more 2. Exchange of written cases to be by reasonable and a violation of sections competitive position within their sphere June 15, 1966, • 201 and 202 of the Communications Act of operations. 3. Hearing (for rulings on objections of 1934; that complainant is required to 5. In addition, complainant alleges to written cases) to be held at 10 a.m., and does give A.T. & T. operation or that the same tariff in question provides June 22, 1966, ders so that A.T. & T. knows in advance occasional use rates which are based 4. Witnesses are to be notified by June of complainant’s transmission times; upon a 1-hour minimum rate proportion 24, 1966, and that, based on information and belief, ately higher than the 8-hour rates; that 5. Oral testimony is to be taken in a A.T. & T. has used facilities contracted such occasional service charge per in hearing on September 12, 1966. for but unprogramed by complainant for terexchange channel is $1.15 per hour I t is further ordered, In accordance other revenue producing purposes during per airline mile to which are added cer with the above agreements, that the the 5-hour per day, per month paid for tain charges for station connection and hearing in this matter now scheduled to but not used by complainant but A.T. & local channels; that the existing rates commence May 23, 1966 is hereby re T. has not given complainant credit for for occasional service based on the 1-hour scheduled to commence at 10 a.m., June such other revenues; and that this latter unit is unjust and tends to discriminate 22, 1966, in the Commission’s offices in practice, too, has been unfair, discrimi against new stations and to discourage their establishment; that the present Washington, D.C. natory, and unreasonable, and a violation of sections 201 and 202 of the Communi rates defeat the ability of new stations to Released: May 6, 1966. cations Act of 1934. compete effectively against well-en F ederal C ommunications 3. The complaint further alleges that trenched network affiliates in the same C o m m is s io n , the aforementioned 8-hour minimum market and thereby thwart the alloca [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , period rates have a stultifying and det tions objectives of the Commission; that Secretary. rimental effect on the development of nonaffiliated stations need the ability to additional television stations in that such buy program transmission service at [F.R. Doc. 66-5141; Filed, May 10, 1966; lower costs for smaller time units, such as 8:49 a.m.] rates tend to cut new stations off from high quality programing resources which 15 minutes; and that requiring such ¡new stations must have to stimulate ^service on the basis of a 15-minute unit [Docket No. 16043; FCC 66-403] early conversion to UHF and to attract would make available to new stations viewers from well-entrenched VHF com and nonnetwork stations brand new pro SPORTS NETWORK, INC., AND AMER petition; that it is through a central gram sources Which will enable them to ICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH program producer able to invest money compete more effectively and provide a CO. in quality programing and able to offer stimulus to the development of new TV stations and the fuller use of TV chan Memorandum Opinion and Order advertisers a network of stations for si multaneous viewing that stations have nels reserved for education. Designating Formal Complaint for been able to become financially stable 6. Complainant cites Carter Mountain Hearing and to render a good local service; that Transmission Corp. v. F.C.C., 321 F. 2d the Commission recognized the forego 359, and alleges that the Commission has Sports Network, Inc., New York, N.Y., authority to and should regulate complainant, vs. American Telephone & ing in its Second Report on Deinter- mixture, 13 R.R. 1571, 1574 (1956); that common carriers subject to its jurisdic for the indefinite future it will be difficult tion in a manner that will advance and 1 Commissioners Loevinger and Wadsworth not negate its allocations objectives of absent. for TV stations, particularly independ- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6919 encouraging fuller utilization of the UHP station connection charges of A.T. & T. know the exact investment of A.T. & T. in band and the establishment of more local for program transmission are also ex program transmission facilities and the TV service; and that the present rate cessive and the Commission should in use of and income from such investment; structure defeats these objectives. Com vestigate such connection charges as well that it is incumbent upon A.T. & T. to plainant prays (1) that the Commission as the interexchange charges for the 8- allege matters within its knowledge alone find that the rates and charges which hour and 1-hour services; that based on that would indicate that its rates are fair A.T. & T. has been requiring complain custom and regular practice, A.T. & T. and reasonable; that there is no pre ant to pay under Tariffs No. 198 and 216 should have given complainant credit sumption of reasonableness of long for program transmission service have for revenues earned by A.T. & T. for use standing rates; that the present tariffs been unjust and discriminatory; (2) that by other customers of facilities paid for seem to suit not more than three cus the Commission determine that defend by complainant; that A.T. & T ’s rates are tomers and are unlawful for other pres ant owes to complainant five-eighths of having an adverse effect on the growth ent or potential customers; that no the charges defendant made of com of the television service and need a meaningful justification has been pre plainant during the past 12-month period major and full review; that, since sented to the Commission for the present for interexchange channel relaying,' and A.T. & T. has all the figures on costs and rates; that exorbitant rates can defeat order defendant to pay the same to the expenses in rendering the services in the hopes for UHP; that technical im complainant; (3) that A. T. & T. be di question, it was reasonable to expect provements and economies have been ef rected to show the extent to which it that it would respond with facts and fected by A.T. & T.; that custom and derived revenue from applying the facili figures to show that its monthly contract practice require A.T. & T. to give com ties paid for but not used by complainant and occasional use interexchange rates plainant credit for revenue earned by to service to other customers of defend are reasonable and fair; and that the A.T. & T. for use by other customers of ant, and that the amount awarded to complainant has raised major public in facilities paid for by complainant; that complainant as damages take such reve terest and policy problems which should a different rate structure would do much nues into consideration algo; (4) that be reviewed by the Commission in a to increase the viability of new TV sta A. T. & T. be directed to file tariffs pro comprehensive way in an adjudicatory tions; and that sections 313 and 314 of viding for program transmission rates forum. the Act go to the very heart of the Com for audio and video that would be ap 9. A.T. & T. moves to dismiss the com mission’s responsibilities to the public. proximately three-eighths of the current plaint on the grounds that while the Discussion. 11. This is a complaint combined audio-video rate of $39.50, or complaint contains a bare conclusory al filed pursuant to the provisions of section approximately $14.82 per airline mile legation that the charges have been un 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, based on 3 hours per day of service per fair, discriminatory, and unreasonable as amended and §§ 1.716 to 1.735 of our month, which hours do not necessarily and a violation of sections 201 and 202 rules implementing that section of the have to be consecutive; and (5) that A.T. of the Act, it is devoid of any factual Act. We have summarized the pleadings & T. be directed to file tariffs providing allegations which support such conclu at some length inasmuch as A.T. & T.’s for occasional interexchange channel sion; that the complaint assumes the Motion to Dismiss presents the initial service based on a lower time unit such as justness and reasonableness of the question of whether the complaint, on its 15 minutes, with the cost per airline mile charges for 8-hour daily service and 1- face, is legally sufficient to state a cause scaled down in an appropriate manner; hour occasional service for such service of action under the Communications Act and (6) that the Commission grant such periods; that the essence of the com of 1934, as amended. I f the complaint is other and further relief as may be ap plaint is that the tariffs are unjust and not legally sufficient, it must be dismissed propriate in the premises. unreasonable because the minimum under § 1.735 of our rules. Pertinent to 7. A.T. & T.’s answer to the complaint charges are for periods longer than this area of our inquiry are §§ 1.722 and admits that it renders service to com complainant desires; that no showing is 1.726 of our rules. Section 1.722 requires plainant but that complainant owes made that the costs to A.T. & T. for pro formal complaints to be so drawn as to A.T. & T. $45,000 which is the subject of viding the service for the minimum advise the Commission and the defendant a law suit pending in the Supreme Court periods sought by complainant would be fully wherein the provisions of the Com of the State of New York, Westchester proportionally, or even materially, lower munications Act have been violated and County; that complainant has correctly than the costs for furnishing the service as to the facts claimed to constitute any stated the interexchange channel rates for the present minimum periods; that, such violation, and § 1.726 requires any for both the 8-hour minimum period to the contrary, the probable conse complaint alleging discrimination, pref monthly contract service and the 1-hour quence of providing service on a non- erence or prejudice, to “ specify the par minimum period occasional service; that consecutive basis would be-to increase ticular person, company or other entity, complainant gives service orders and costs to A.T. & T .; that throughout each locality or description of traffic affected A.T. & T. has some advance notice of the 8-hour daily period or 1-hour period of thereby, and the particular discrimina hours when complainant’s programs will occasional service, A.T. & T. provided to tion, preference, prejudice, or disadvan be transmitted; and that defendant must complainant all of the services for which tage relied upon as constituting a viola pay the minimum charges for the 8-hour it had any need or desire; that the fact tion of the Communications Act.” monthly contract service and the mini that a rate may be so high as to make it 12. Complainant alleges violation of mum charges for 1-hour occasional serv uneconomical for one particular person sections 201, 202, 313, and 314 of the ice whether or not defendant uses the does not, of itself, establish the unreason Act. Although the complaint is not as service for the minimum periods. How ableness of such rate; that neither the specific as it should be in this regard we ever, A.T. & T. denies all other allegations convenience of complainant nor its assume from the context of the com and states as an affirmative defense that unique requirements constitute any plaint that complainant intended to the complaint fails to state any claim grounds for requiring tariff revisions; refer to paragraph (b) of section 201 against A.T. & T. for which relief can be that the charges in question have been and to paragraph (a) of section 202 and granted for the reasons that it fails to in effect for a substantial period of time we shall treat the complaint accordingly. allege sufficient facts which, even if and the reasonableness thereof is pre 13. Section 201(b) requires all charges, proven, would constitute a violation of sumed to continue in the absence of a practices, classifications, and regulations any provision of the Communications showing of unreasonableness on the part to be just and reasonable and any such Act, or any rule, order or regulation of of any complaining party; and that the charge, practice, classification, or reg the Commission. allegations of complainant concerning ulation that is unjust and unreason 8. Complainant’s reply to A.T. & T.’s competition within the television indus able is declared to be unlawful. Sec answer is that, in defending A.T. & T.’s tion 202(a) declares unlawful any un law suit for $45,000, complainant, among try are entirely beside the point since neither section 313 nor section 314 is just or unreasonable discrimination in other defenses and counterclaims, is connection with like communication claiming that A.T. & T.’s rates have been germane to the matter of lawfulness of service; or any undue or unreasonable unfair, discriminatory, unreasonable, the charges. preference or advantage to any particu and in violation of sections 201 and 202 10. Complainant’s reply to the Motion lar person or class of persons or locality; of the Communications Act; that the to Dismiss is that complainant does not or the subjection of any particular per-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 No. 91----- 5 6920 NOTICES audio), that are used for periods shorter son, class of persons, or locality to any are provided under the “ Monthly Serv ice” offering. than 8 hours per day, 7 days per week, undue or unreasonable prejudice or per month are unjust and unreasonable disadvantage. 17. For the foregoing reasons, we shall deny defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with and therefore unlawful within the mean 14. We agree with defendant that ing of section 201 (b) of the Communica complainant’s allegations of fact raise out prejudice and shall enter into an in vestigation of the issues raised by the tions Act of 1934, as amended, or are no question as to the lawfulness of the unduly discriminatory or preferential in present charges for interexchange chan complaint that are hereinafter specifi cally set forth in our order. violation of section 202(a) of said Act; nel facilities furnished for video program (2) The amount of damages, if any, transmission (including audio) when 18. As heretofore stated, the complaint also alleges violations of sections 313 and that the complainant may be entitled to such facilities are used by the customer as a result of any charges collected by for the full 8 hour, 7 day a week monthly 314 of the Act. Section 313 of the Act provides for the application of the anti defendant during the 12-month period period to which the present minimum prior to the filing of the complaint that charges now apply under the “Monthly trust laws to the manufacture and sale of, and to trade in, radio apparatus and may be found herein to be unlawful; Service” offering. However, complain (3) Whether, in the light of facts de ant’s allegations go beyond this and devices entering into or affecting inter state or foreign commerce and to inter veloped in connection with the fore assert, in essence, that under the rates going issues, the Commission, in accord now applicable to the provision of such state or foreign radio communications. It further provides for imposition by the ance with the provisions of section 205 facilities, complainant pays the same of the said Act, should prescribe new or amount for 3 hours a day (or less) use Commission or a court of certain sanc tions on radio licensees found guilty by revised charges, classifications, regula of such facilities that others pay for 8 tions and practices applicable to inter hours á day use of the same kind of a court of violating any such antitrust laws. Section 314 of the Act prohibits exchange channel facilities for television facilities; that the facilities used by program transmission (both video and complainant for 3 hours (or less) a day common ownership or control of cable and radio facilities if the purpose or audio) that are used for periods shorter are released to defendant and used by it than 8 hours per day, 7 days per week, for other revenue-producing purposes effect thereof is to substantially"lessen during the remaining 5-hour period competition between any place in the per month; United States and any place in any for I t is further ordered, That defendant’s without any adjustments in such charges request for dismissal of the complaint to complainant; and that the overall eign country or unlawfully to create is denied without prejudice; revenue to defendant for providing such monopoly in any line of commerce. The allegations of the complaint fail to advise It is further ordered, That a copy of facilities to complainant and others for this order shall be served upon the com an 8-hour period are substantially the Commission and the defendant plainant and defendant herein; greater than the revenue from providing wherein the provisions of section 313 or It is further ordered, That a Hearing the same facilities to a single customer section 314 have been violated or as to the facts claimed to constitute any such vio Examiner shall be designated to preside for the same period. We view these in the complaint proceedings ordered allegations as legally sufficient to raise lation. We, therefore, conclude that the herein, who shall prepare an Initial Deci questions, which we do not now decide, complaint is legally deficient in its alle as to whether there is any justification gations of violation of section 313 and sion on all of the issues in the complaint proceedings as provided in § 1.267 of the for the application of the same charges section 314 of the Act and, in the investi for the substantially lesser period of use gation we are ordering herein, we shall Commission’s rules. by complainant. We officially notice, in include no issue with respect to these Adopted: May 4, 1966. statutory provisions. This does not this connection, that defendant’s tariff Released: May 6, 1966. presently provides for prorating the mean, however, that evidence in these aforementioned minimum charge among areas would be inadmissible if pertinent F ederal C ommunications different users of such facilities “ when to the section 201(b) or 202(a) issues C o m m is s io n ,1 the available facilities are insufficient to herein. [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , meet the total needs of customers for 19. We believe that it would be use Secretary. monthly service” or “ when the number ful to point out that the complaint pro [F.R. Doc. 66-5142; Filed, May 10, 1966; of customers requesting monthly serv ceedings that we are instituting herein 8:49 a.m.] ice * * * exceeds the number of sta involve questions that are not in issue in the pending proceedingsin Docket No. tions desiring such service over such [Docket Nos. 16623, 16624; FCC 66-410] facilities.” (Original p. 127, A.T. & T. 16258 relating to the investigation of the Tariff FCC No. 260.) Bell System charges for interstate and WDIX, INC., AND RADIO 15. We conclude, in view of the fore foreign communication services. As we ORANGEBURG, INC. going, that complainant’s allegations of have heretofore indicated, the proceed fact, taken as a whole, fairly raise ques ings in Docket No. 16258 are concerned Order Designating Applications for tions under sections. 201(b) and 202(a) with the total revenue requirements of Consolidated Hearing on Stated as to the lawfulness of the charges now the Bell System companies applicable to Issues applicable to the interexchange channel their interstate and foreign communica facilities provided by defendant for video tion services, and the variation in the In re applications of WDIX, Inc., (and audio) program transmission where level of earnings for the different classes Orangeburg, S.C., Docket No. 16623, File the use thereof by a customer is signif of service, and not the internal rate No. BPH-4554, requests: 106.7 me, No. icantly less than 8 hours per day, 7 days components, practices, or regulations 294; 94 kw; 278 feet; Radio Orangeburg, per week, per month. within each of the principal rate classi Inc., Orangeburg, S.C., Docket No. 16624, 16. With respect to the “ occasional fications of Service. In the Matter of File No. BPH-4642, requests: 106.7 me, use” offering of defendant and the rates A.T. & T. Revision of Definition of Serv No. 294; 96.6 kw; 280 feet; for construc therefor, complainant’s allegations of ice Points, 2 F.C.C. 2d 359 (Jan. 27,1966). tion permits. fact are to the effect that the charges to Accordingly, it is ordered, That pur At a session of the Federal Communi suant to the provision of sections 201 cations Commission held at its offices in the user under this offering are consider Washington, D.C., on the 4th day of ably higher per airline mile per hour or through 209 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, a public hearing May 1966; _ fraction thereof than the average charge shall be held at a time and place to be 1. The Commission has under con per airline mile per hour or fraction hereinafter designated upon the follow sideration the above-captioned and de thereof for the same facilities provided ing specific issues raised by the above scribed applications which are mutually under the “Monthly Service” offering. complaint: exclusive in that operation by the appli This is adequate to present questions as Issues. (1) Whether the charges, cants as proposed would result in to whether the charges for “ occasional classifications, regulations, and practices mutually destructive interference. use” bear a reasonable relationship to the of defendant, applicable to interexchange charges for the same facilities for a com channel facilities furnished for television 1 Commissioners Loevinger and Wadsworth parable period of use when such facilities program transmission (both video and absent.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6921

2. H. E. Crapps, president and 50 per which of the proposals would better serve b. All orders, instructions, and mem cent stockholder in applicant Radio the public interest. oranda of the Secretary of Labor or other Orangeburg, Inc., holds a controlling 3. To determine, in the light of theofficials of the Department of Labor are interest in the Ridge Broadcasting, Co., evidence adduced pursuant to the fore superseded to the extent that they are Inc., licensee of station WBLR-FM, going issues, which of the applications inconsistent herewith. Batesburg, S.C., which is located ap for construction permit should be 3. Background. Pursuant to Execu proximately 49 miles from the site pro granted. tive Order 10925 as amended by Execu posed in the Radio Orangeburg, Inc. ap 8. It is further ordered, That in the tive Order 11114 the President’s Com plication. Therefore, Radio Orange event of a grant of the W DIX, Inc., ap mittee on Equal Employment Opportu burg, Inc. would be restricted in its plication, the permit shall contain the nity carried out activities to achieve ability to increase facilities without following condition: § 73.210(a) (2) of nondiscrimination in employment within causing overlap of the I mv/m contours the Commission’s rules are waived to the executive branch of the Government in contravention of § 73.240(a) (1) of the permit the establishment of the main and by Government contractors. Execu Commission’s rules. studio 1.8 northwest of the city limits tive Order 11246 superseded those Execu 3. As we stated in the Reising case, 1 of Orangeburg, S.C., on U.S. 178. tive Orders and abolished the President’s FCC 2d 1082, 6 R.R. 2d 431 (1965), pro 9. It is further ordered, That, to avail Committee on Equal Employment Op graming evidence would not be admissi themselves of the opportunity to be portunity. ble under the standard comparative heard, the applicants herein, pursuant to Under provisions of Executive Order issue, absent a finding regarding a sub § 1.221(c) of the Commission’s rules, in 11246 the Civil Service Commission has stantial and material difference between person or by attorney, shall within 20 been assigned responsibility for super the proposals. In this case, considera days of the mailing of this order, file with vising and providing leadership in the tion of the programing proposals is re the Commission in triplicate a written conduct of equal opportunity programs quired because W DIX, Inc., proposes to appearance stating an intention to ap within the executive departments and duplicate its companion AM station ap pear on the date fixed for the hearing agencies. proximately 14.5 hours per day or 79.88 and present evidence on the issues speci The Secretary of Labor under Execu percent of the time, while Radio Orange fied in this order. tive Order 11246 is responsible for burg, Inc., proposes to duplicate the 10. I t is further ordered, That, the achieving nondiscrimination in employ programing of its AM station 2.5 hours applicants herein shall, pursuant to sec ment by Government contractors and per day or only about 16.11 percent of tion 311(a)(2) of the Communications subcontractors and by construction con the time. Therefore, programing evi Act of 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of tractors in Federally assisted construc dence will be admissible under the stand the Commission’s rules, give notice of tion contracts. ard comparative issue. the hearing either individually or, if 4. Establishment of the Office of Fed 4. W DIX, Inc., has requested waiver feasible and consistent with the rules, eral Contract Compliance (EEO). There of § 73.210(a) (2) of the Commission’s jointly, within the time and in the man is hereby established in the Department rules to permit the main studio to be ner prescribed in such rule, and shall of Labor an Office of Federal Contract located outside the city limits of Orange advise the Commission of the publication Compliance (EEO) which shall be burg, S.C. The proposed main studio, of such notice as required by § 1.594(g) headed by a Director appointed by the 1.8 miles from town would be located on of the rules. Secretary of Labor. U.S. 178, a major artery, and is already 5. Delegation of Authority and Assign Released: May 6,1966. used as a main studio for companion ment of Responsibilities. Under the AM station WDIX. Under these cir F ederal C ommunications general direction of the Secretary of cumstances, we believe that adequate C o m m is s io n ,1 Labor the Director of the Office of Fed justification has been provided for [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , eral Contract Compliance (EEO) is waiver in the event of a grant of the Secretary. hereby delegated authority and assigned W DIX, Inc., application. responsibility for: 5. Except as indicated by the issues [F.R. Doc. 66-5143; Filed, May 10, 1966; 8:49 a.m.] a. Carrying out the responsibilities as set forth below, each of the applicants signed to the Secretary of Labor by Exec is qualified to construct and operate as utive Order 11246, except issuing rules proposed. and regulations of a general nature. — 6. Consequently, the Commission is DEPARTMENT OF LABOR b. Developing and recommending to unable to make the statutory finding the Secretary rules and regulations nec that a grant of the subject applications Office of the Secretary essary and appropriate to achieve the would serve the public interest, con venience, and necessity, and is of the [Secretary’s Order No. 26-65] purposes of Executive Order 11246. c. Coordinating with the Equal Em opinion that they must be designated OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT ployment Opportunity Commission and for hearing in a consolidated proceeding COMPLIANCE (EEO) on the issues set forth below: the Department of Justice on matters 7. I t is ordered, That, pursuant to sec Establishment relating to Title VII of the Civil Rights tion 309(e) of the Communications Act Act of 1964 and maintaining liaison with of 1934, as amended, the applications 1. Purpose. To establish the Office of are designated for hearing in a consoli Federal Contract Compliance (EEO) in other agencies having civil rights and dated proceeding, at a time and place to the Department of Labor and to delegate equal employment opportunity activities. be specified in a subsequent order, upon authority for the discharge of responsi d. Providing regular reports to the the following issues: bilities assigned to the Secretary of Labor Secretary of Labor concerning the ac 1. To determine the extent to which under Executive Order 11246. 2. Authority and Directives Affected. tivities of the Office and problems re duopoly considerations may preclude fu quiring the Secretary’s attention. ture expansion of the proposed facilities a. This Order is issued pursuant to the of Radio Orangeburg, Inc., and in light Act of March 4, 1913 (37 Stat. 736; 5 6. Effective date. This order is ef of the evidence adduced in response to U.S.C. 611), Reorganization Plan No. 6 fective immediately. of 1950 (15 F.R. 3174; 64 Stat. 1263, 5 this question, whether this proposal rep Signed at Washington, D.C., this 5th U.S.C. 611, Note) and Executive Order resents an efficient use of the channel day of October 1965. within the meaning of section 307(b) of 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled the Communications Act of 1934, as Equal Employment Opportunity. W . W illa r d W ir t z , amended. Secretary of Labor. 2. To determine in the event issue one 1 Commissioners Loevinger and Wadsworth [F.R. Doc. 66-5105; Filed, May 10, 1966; is resolved in Radio Orangeburg’s favor, absent. 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6922 NOTICES

Docket No. Pres- FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION and Applicant Purchaser, field,.and location Price per Mcf sure base [Docket Nos. G-5557, etc.] date filed

B & G OIL & GAS CO. ET AL. G-5557-— — B & G Oil & Gas Co. (successor Consolidated Gas Supply Coro., 20.0 15.325 E 3-11-66 to Bernard S. Graves, et al.) De Kalb District, Gilmer County, Notice of Applications for Certificates, c/o Beta Robinson, disbursing W . Va. agent, 4806 Chimney Dr., Abandonment of Service and Peti Charleston, W. Va., 25302. tions To Amend Certificates 1 G-17979—. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., Post Transwestem Pipeline Co., Council (') D4-27-66 Office Box 521, Tulsa, Okla., Grove Formation, Beaver County, M a y 3, 1966. 74102 (partial abandonment). Okla. . , CI60-32— Texaco Inc. (Operator), et al., El Paso Natural Gas Co., La Barge \ Uneconomical Take notice that each of the Appli D 1-17-66 Post Office Box 52332, Hous Field, Sublette County, Wyo. ton, Tex., 77052 (partial cants listed herein has filed an applica abandonment). tion or petition pursuant to section 7 of CI62-604___ AUerton Miller, 2501 Grant Equitable Gas Co., Meade District, 25.0 15.325 the Natural Gas Act for authorization to C 4-27-66 Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa., 15219. Upshur County, W . Va. CI62-1251-. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., Wit- 15.0 14.65 sell natural gas in interstate commerce C 4-25-66 Inc., d.b.a. Texas Pacific Oil burton Field, Latimer County, or to abandon service heretofore author Co. (Operator), et al., Post Okla. Office Box 747, Dallas, Tex., ized as described herein, all as more fully 75221. 15.025 described in the respective applications CI63-318__ * Frank A. Schultz, et al., 730 El Paso Natural Gas Co., Basin Da 13.0 C 4-25-66 Fidelity Union Tower, Akard kota and Blanco Mesaverde and amendments which are on file with and Pacific Sts., Dallas, Tex., Fields, San Juan County, N. Mex. the Commission and open to public 75201. CI64r-357___ American Metal Climax, Inc. Mountain Fuel Supply Co., acreage 15.0 14.65 inspection. C 4-25-66 (Agent and Operator), et al., in Sweetwater County, Wyo. Protests or petitions to intervene may Enterprise Bldg., Tulsa, Okla., 74103. be filed with the Federal Power Commis 15.0 CI64-670..— Marathon Oil Co., 539 South Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., Wil- 14.65 sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in ac C 4-27-66 Main si., Findlay, Ohio, burton Field, Haskell and Le cordance with the rules of practice and 45840. Flore Counties, OHa. CI65-539___ Union Oil Co. oi California, Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Amer >16.608 14.65 procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or C 3-11-66 Union Oil Center, Los An ica, Walt Canyon Unit, Indian before May 26,1966. geles, Calif., 90017. Basin Area, Eddy County, N. Mex. 14.0 14.65 Take further notice that, pursuant to CI65-1175- James H. Heiland (Operator), United Gas Pipe Line Co., Wee- the authority contained in and subject 3-28-66» et al., 2111 Alamo National satche Field, Cabeza Creek Area, to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Bank Bldg., San Antonio, Goliad County, Tex. Tex! , 78205. *14.5 14.65 Federal Power Commission by sections C166-766— M W J Producing Co. (Op El Paso Natural Gas Co., acreage in 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the A 2-23-66 erator), agent, 413 First Reagan County, Tex. National Bank Bldg., Mid Commission’s rules of practice and pro land, Tex., 79701. 14.65 cedure, a hearing will be held without CI66-773__ George L. Buckles, et al. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Langlie- ‘ 9.0 Mattix Field, Lea County, further notice before the Commission on (G-6323) (successor to Amerada Petrole F 2-21-66 um Corp.), Post Office Box56, N. Mex. all applications in which no protest or Monahans, Tex., 79756. Jake L. Hamon (Operator), Phillips Petroleum Co., Azalea Declined in petition to intervene is filed within the CI66-800__ pressure B 2-28-66 et al., c/o Wm. Taylor Field, Midland County, Tex. time required herein, if the Commission LaGrone, attorney, Post on its own review of the matter believes Office Box 663, Dallas/ Tex., 75221. that a grant of the certificates or the CI66-804... Gulf Oil Corp. (Operator), El Paso Natural GaS Co., Teague Depleted authorization for the proposed abandon B 3-3-66 et al., Post Office Box 1589, McKee Pool, Lea County, N. Mex. Tulsa, Okla., 74102. 1 14.65 ment is required by the public conven CI66-80.6 K. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., • Post El Paso Natural Gas Co., Langlie 10.5 ience and necessity. Where a protest or A 3-2-66 Office Box 521, Tulsa, Okla., Mattix Field, Lea County, N. Mex. petition for leave to intervene is timely 74102. 16.0 14.65 C166-825__ Joseph S. Grass, 30 Broad St., El Paso Natural Gas Co., Spraberry New York, N.Y., 10004. Trend Area, Reagan County, Tex. filed, or where the Commission on its own A 2-28-66 • 14.5 14.65 motion believes that a formal hearing C166-833__ Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Spraberry (G-18925) (successor to Jake Jacobsen »), Field,-Midland County, Tex. is required, further notice of such hear F 3-4-66 Post Office Box 2444, Houston, Tex., 77001. ing will be duly given: Provided, however, 16.0 14.65 CI66-875__ Midwest Oil Coro., 1700 Broad Northern Natural Gas Co., Meybin That pursuant to § 2.56, Part 2, State A 3-21-66 way, Denver, Colo., 80202. Ranch Area, Crockett County, Tex. ment of General Policy and Interpreta Depleted C166-913___ Dalton H. Cobb, 906 Vaughn Pioneer Gathering System, Inc., tions, Chapter I of Title 18 of the Code Bldg., Midland, Tex., 79701. acreage in Crockett County, Tex. B 3-31-66 17.0 14.65 of Federal Regulations, as amended CI66-1003.. Southern Union Production Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., all permanent certificates of public con (G-13299) (successor to Sunray D X Oil Laverne Field, Harper County, F 4-18-66 Co.,10), Fidelity Union Okla. venience and necessity granting applica Tower, Dallas, Tex., 75201. 14.0 14.65 tions, filed ¿iter April 15, 1965, without CI66-1004... Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., Post Northern Natural Gas Co., Snake A 4-21-66 Office Box 521, Tulsa, Okla., Creek, West Field, Clark County, further notice, will contain a condition Kans. 74102. 12.5252 15.025 precluding any filing of an increased CI66-1005. G. H. Vaughn, Jr., and Jack O. United Gas Pipe Line Co.. North (G-13633) Vaughn (Operators), et al. east Lisbon Field, Claiborne rate at a price in excess of that desig F 4-15-66 (successors to Union Produc Parish, La. nated for the particular area of produc ing Co.), % E. H. Gunter/ general manager, 1200 tion for the period prescribed therein Vaughn Bldg., Dallas, Tex., unless at the time of filing such certifi 75201. 17.0 14.65 cate application, or within the time fixed CI66-1006-. Yucca Petroleum Co., First Transwestern Pipeline Co., South A 4-20-66 National Bank Bldg., Follett (Morrow) Field, Lipscomb herein for the filing of protests or peti County, Tex. Amarillo, Tex. 10.0 14.65 tions to intervene the Applicant indicates CI66-1007-. John W. Herndon, et al., Post Banquete Gas Co., a division of A 4-20-66 Office Drawer 6160, Corpus Crestmont Oil & Gas Co., North in writing that it is unwilling to accept Christi, Tex., 78403. Odem Field, San Patricio County, Tex. such a condition. In the event Appli 15.75 15.025 CI66-1008-- Robert Mosbacher (Operator), United Gas Pipe Line Co., Roanoke cant is unwilling to accept such condi A 4-20-66 et al., 602 Bank of Commerce Field, Jefferson Davis Parish, La. tion the application will be set for formal Bldg., Houston, Tex., 77002. Consolidated Gas Supply Corp., Uneconomical , hearing. CI66-1009- : Garrett Woodford & Swadley, B 4-20-66 316 West Pike St., Clarks Ten Mile District, Harrison Under the procedure herein provided County, W . Va. burg, W . Va., 26301. 2 a o 15.325 for, unless otherwise advised, it will be CI66-1010-. L. W. Prunty, Post Office Box Carnegie Natural Gas Co., Union A 4-20-66 1068, Ponca City, Okla., District, Ritchie County, W . Va. unnecessary for Applicants to appear or 74602. be represented at the hearing. Filing code: A—Initial service. J o s e p h H. G u t r id e , B—Abandonment. C—Amendment to add acreage. Secretary. D —Amendment to delete acreage; E—Succession. 1 This notice does not provide for consoli F—Partial succession; dation for hearing of the several matters See footnotes at end of table. covered herein, nor should it be so construed.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6923

[Docket No. RI66-360] Docket No. Pres and Applicant Purchaser, field, and location Price per Mcf sure ATLANTIC REFINING CO. date filed base Order Providing for Hearing on and CI66-1011...... Rich Oil & Gas Co., 316 West B 4-20-66 Pike St., Clarksburg, W. Va., Murphy District, Ritchie County Suspension of Proposed Change in 26301. W . Va. Rate CI66-1012...... Amax Petroleum Corp., et al., Mountain Fuel Supply Co., acreage 15.0 14.65 A 4-20-66 Enterprise Bldg., Tulsa, in Sweetwater County, Wyo. M a y 4, 1966. Okla., 74103. CI66-1013...... __ L. H. Witwer and F. G. Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 17.0 14.65 On April 4,1966, The Atlantic Refining A 4-20-66 Witwer, 2727 South Victor; Laverne Field, Harper County, Co. (Atlantic) 1 tendered for filing a pro Tulsa, Okla. Okla. CI66-1014-...... Oil States Sales Co., 4401 Carnegie Natural Gas Co., Union 20.0 15.325 posed change in its presently effective A 4-22-66 Centre Ave., Pittsburgh, Pa., District, Ritchie County, W. Va. 15213. rate schedule for sales of natural gas C166-1015...... Carl Hinkle, Ellenboro, W. Va., Carnegie Natural Gas Co., Center- 20.0 15.325 subject to the jurisdiction of the Com A 4-18-66 26346. ville District, Tyler County, W. mission. The proposed change, which CI66-1016,...... Union Oil Co. of California, Texas Gas- Transmission Corp., 18.25 15.025 constitutes an increased rate and charge, A 4-25-66 Union Oil Center, Los Welsh Field, Jefferson Davis Angeles, Calif., 90017. Parish, La. is contained in the following designated CI66-1017______Dan E. McMillen and S. R. Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 19.5 14.65 filing: A 4-25-66 McCampbell, 207 Cravens acreage in Dewey County, Okla. Bldg., Oklahoma City, Okla., Description: Notice of change, undated. 73102. Purchaser and producing area: Trans C166-1018...... Monsanto Co., et al., 1300 Main Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., Depleted western Pipeline Co. (Kermit Field, Winkler B 4-25-66 St., Houston, Tex., 77002. South Lucky Field, Bienville Parish, La. County, Tex.) (Permian Basin Area). CI66-1019...... Southwest Oil Industries, Inc., Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Mo- 17.0 14.65 Rate schedule designation: Supplement A 4-15-66 801 First National Bldg., cane-Laveme Field, Beaver No. 1 to Atlantic’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule Oklahoma City, Okla., 73102. County, Okla. No. 232. CI66-1020...... _ Miller & Fox Minerals Corp. Texas San Juan Oil Corp., Miller and Depleted B 4-25-66 (Operator), et al., Oil Indus- Fox Field, Jim Wells County, tries Bldg., Corpus Christi, Tex. Effective date: May 5, 1966.2 Tex., 78401. Amount of annual increase: $5,384. CI66-1021______Depleted Effective rate: 16.0 cents per Mcf.® B 4-25-66 North ASOG Field, Jim Wells Proposed rate: 20.5 cents per Mcf.* County, Tex. CI66-1022...... John A. Egan, Operator (sue- El Paso Natural Gas Co., San Juan 12.0495 15.025 Pressure base: 14.65 p.s.i.a. (G-9837) cessor to E. B. Germany, Basin, Rio Arriba County, N. F 4-25-66 d.b.a. E*. B. Germany & Sons Mex. Atlantic requests that its proposed rate (Operator), et al.), Post Office Box 208, Farmington, N. increase be permitted to become effective Mex., 7840L as of September 1,1965, the contractually C166-1023______Callery Properties, Inc., 1550 Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., 15.0 15.025 provided effective date. Good cause has A 4-25-66 First City National Bank Manila Village Field, Jefferson Bldg., Houston, Tex., 77002. Parish, La. not been shown for waiving the 3 0-day C166-1024...... Southwestern Exploration Con- Lone Star Gas Co., acreage in Depleted notice requirement provided in section B 4-25-66 sultants, Inc., 404 Local Fed- Stephens County, Okla. eral Bldg., Oklahoma City, 4(d) of the Natural Gas Act to permit an Okla., 73102. earlier effective date for Atlantic’s rate CI66-1025______(«) B 4-25-66 Jefferson County, Okla. filing and such request is denied. CI66-1026...... (•') Atlantic, a producer-respondent in the B 4-25-66 phens County, Okla. Permian Basin Opinion No. 468, proposes CI66-1027...... Southwestern Exploration, Depleted B 4-25-66 Consultants, Iric. (Opera- son County, Okla. a periodic rate increase from 16.0 cents 1 tor), et al. to 20.5 cents per Mcf, at 14.65 p.s.i.a., CI66-028____ (“) B 4-2S-66 amounting to $5,384 annually, for a sale CI66-1029...... Champlin Petroleum Co., Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., a di- 15.0 14.65 of new residue gas derived from gas-well A 4-25-66 Post Office Box 9365, Fort vision of Tenneco Inc.,12 Beaur- Worth, Tex., 76107. line Field, Hidalgo County, Tex. gas to Transwestem Pipeline Co. in the CI66-1030______Lewis S. Rosenstiel, et al., c/o Depleted Permian- Basin Area of Texas. The pro B 4-27-66 Seymour Roberts, controller. Puerto Bay Field, San Patricio posed increased rate exceeds the appli 26 Journal Square, Jersey County, Tex. City, N.J., 07306. cable area base rate of 16.5 cents per CI66-1032...... Hundred Gas Co., c/o A. M. Carnegie Natural Gas Co., Ells- 20.0 16.325 Mcf prescribed by Opinion No. 468. A 4-27-66 Snider, partner. Hundred. worth District, Tyler County and W. Va., 26575. Green District, Wetzel County, The contract involved was executed on W . Va. March 22, 1961, and thus covers a sale 0166-1033...... 20.0 15.325 A 4-27-66 District, Wetzel County, W . Va. for “new” gas under Opinion No. 468. CI66-1034...... Bowers Drilling Co., Inc., 1434 Cities Service Gas Co., Little Bear 14.0 14.65 On March 21,1966, Atlantic filed, in com A 4-27-66 Wichita Plaza, Wichita, Creek, Barber County, Kans. Kans. 67202. pliance with Opinion No. 468, a rate CI66-1035...... Glenn Tompkins and John R. Pennzoil Co., Grant District, 15.0 15.325 scheduled-quality statement for the sub A 4-27-66 Welch, d.b.a. Oil Ridge Gas Ritchie County, W. Va. ject sale. The quality statement shows Co., 302 Jarvis St., Charles- ton, W . Va., 25301. that the residue gas does not meet the CI66-1036...... J. Gregory Merrion and Robert El Paso Natural Gas Co., Flora 13.0 15.025 quality standards prescribed by Opinion A 4-25-66 L. Bayless, Box 507, Farm- Vista Mesaverde Field, San Juan ingtori, N. Mex., 87401. County, N. Mex. Nos. 468 and 468-A, only insofar as sul CJ66-1037...... Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc., Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., 1315. 6 14.65 phur and water content, with a related A 4-25-66 Post Office Box 2444, Hous- Chapman Ranch Field, Nueces ton, Tex., 77001. County, Tex. treatment cost of 0.524 cent. The qual ity statement further reflects credits of 0.25 cent for delivery pressure in excess 1 Reserves insufficient to justify buyer constructing facilities necessary to connect to well on subject acreage. 2 Rate includes an upward adjustment of 0.608 cent per Mcf for heating value above 1000 B.t.u.’s per cu. ft. of 500 p.s.i.g. and 0.83 cent per Mcf for * Amends contract to include oil well gas which was previously excluded. B.t.u. content between 1,000 and 1,050, * Subject to maximum deduction of 1.0 cent per Mcf from the price of residue gas derived from casinghead gas (from any formation other than the Spraberry) which may require treating. which are applied to offset the treating * Contract provides for a rate of 10.0 cents per Mcf on Jan. 1,1966. Applicant only proposes to collect the 9.0-cent cost of 0.52 cent per Mcf. The B.t.u. rate. < s Service currently being rendered under co-owner’s (Albert Cackle) filings in Docket No. G-10917—Albert Gackle content is shown to be 1085. By order (Operator) , et al., FPC GRS No. 10. Gackle has filed a small producer application which cannot cover Sinclair’s issued March 23, 1966, in Area Rate Pro interest. Applicant proposes to establish its own filing to cover its share of the sale. ceeding, Docket No. AR61-1 (Phillips i Reflects 0.5 cent deduction due to the inability of the subject gas to flow into buyer’s intermediate pressure gathering system. Petroleum Co.', Docket No. G-20405) the 8 Covered under J. E. Connally’s FPC GRS No. 1. » Predecessor’s current rate is 17.2295 cents per Mcf effective subject to refund in Docket No. RI60-104, however. Socony only proposes to collect 14.5 cents per Mcf, the rate established for this sale in Opinion No. 468. i° Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. assigned subject interest to Sunray D X Oil Co., who then assigned the interest to Southern 1 Address is: Post Office Box 2819, Dallas, Union. Tex., 75221. u- Due to partial depletion of gas reservoir, wells are unable to deliver gas into existing gathering facilities; 2 The stated effective date is the first day 12 Formerly Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. 13 Rate in effect subject to refund in Docket No. RI65-196. after expiration of the statutory notice. * Initial rate. [F.R. Doc. 66-5048; Filed, May 10, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] * Periodic rate increase.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6924 NOTICES

Commission indicated it would not allow of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 The total estimated cost of Applicant’s an upward adjustment for B.t.u. content and 1.37(f) ) on or before June 22, 1966. proposed transmission and distribution facilities is $279,330, which cost will be between 1,000 and 1,050 or for delivery By the Commission. pressure in excess of 500 p.s.i.g. as an financed from internally generated offset against a downward quality adjust [ s e a l ! J o s e p h H. G xttride, funds. ment in determining the applicable area Secretary. Protests or petitions to intervene may be filed with the Federal Power Commis rate. That ruling is equally applicable [F.R. Doc. 66-5097; Filed, May 10, 1966; sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord here. 8:45 a.m.] Examination has not been completed ance with the rules of practice and proce with respect to the propriety of other dure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before [Docket No. CP66-340] matters covered in the subject quality June 2, 1966. statement. In our future determination J o s e p h H. G u t r id e , CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE Secretary. as to whether Atlantic’s quality state CO. AND PANHANDLE EASTERN [F.R. Doc. 66-5098; Filed, May 10, 1968; ment is otherwise acceptable, no consid PIPE LINE CO. 8:45 a.m.] eration will be given to the credits proposed in the quality statement for Notice of Application delivery pressure and Btu content in [Docket No. CP66-341] determining the adjustment for treating M a y 4, 1966. costs. Take notice that on April 27, 1966, KENTUCKY GAS TRANSMISSION Since Atlantic’s proposed increased Central Illinois Public Service Co. (Ap CORP. plicant), Illinois Building, Springfield, rate exceeds the applicable area base Notice of Application rate of 16.5 cents per Mcf prescribed by HI., filed in Docket No. CP66-340 an ap Opinion No. 468, it is suspended for five plication pursuant to section 7 (c) of the M a y 4, 1966. months from May 5, 1966, the date of Natural Gas Act for an order of the Com Take notice that on April 28, 1966, expiration of the statutory notice, as mission directing Panhandle Eastern Kentucky Gas Transmission Corp. (Ap herein ordered. Pipe Line Co. (Respondent) to establish plicant) , Post Office Box 1273, Charles Except for the stay of the moratorium physical connection of its transportation ton, W. Va., 25325, filed in Docket No. in Opinion No. 468, Atlantic’s filing would facilities with the facilities proposed to CP66-341 an application pursuant to be rejectable. I f the moratorium is ulti be constructed by Applicant and to sell section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for mately upheld upon judicial review, the and deliver to Applicant volumes of natu a certificate of public convenience and filing will be rejected ab initio. ral gas for resale and distribution in the necessity authorizing the construction The proposed changed rate and charge villages of New Berlin and Loami, San and operation of 8.6 miles of 12-inch may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly dis gamon County, 111., and their environs, natural gas transmission pipeline in criminatory, or preferential, or otherwise all as more fully set forth in the applica Madison County, Ky., all as more fully unlawful. tion which is on file with the Commission set forth in the application which is on The Commission finds: It is necessary and open to public inspection. file with the Commission and open to and proper in the public interest and to Applicant states that the villages of public inspection. aid in the enforcement of the provisions New Berlin and Loami are located in the Applicant states that the proposed of the Natural Gas Act that the Com western part of Sangamon County, 111., pipeline will replace an 8.6-mile segment mission enter upon a hearing concerning approximately 8 and 5 miles, respectively, of an existing 8-inch transmission pipe the lawfulness of the proposed change, north of the gas transmission main of line extending between the Kentucky and that Supplement No. 1 to Atlantic’s Respondent. River and a point in Estill County, Ky., FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 232 be sus Applicant proposes to construct, own, a distance of approximately 25 miles. pended and the use thereof deferred as operate, and maintain approximately 8 Applicant states that the proposal is a hereinafter ordered. miles of 4-inch gas transmission line ex continuation of one part of a plan de The Commission orders: tending from a proposed metering and scribed in its joint application with (A ) Pursuant to the authority of the regulating station of Respondent to be United Fuel Gas Co., an affiliate, filed in Natural Gas Act, particularly sections 4 located approximately 8 miles south of Docket No. CP65-324 on April 9, 1965. and 15 thereof, the Commission’s rules New Berlin to a point near the western The plan involves the modernization of of practice and procedure, and the regu corporate limits of New Berlin and ap Applicant’s system serving utilities on the lations under the Natural Gas Act (18 proximately 3V2 miles of 2-inch gas southwestern end of its operating terri transmission line extending from a point CFR Ch. I ) , a public hearing shall be tory. held upon a date to be fixed by notice 3%o miles south of New Berlin on the Applicant states that the particular from the Secretary concerning the law 4-inch gas transmission line to a point 8.6-mile segment should be replaced due fulness of the proposed increased rate near the west corporate limits of Loami. to the growth in the natural gas market and charge contained in Supplement No. Applicant also proposes to construct, around the city of Lexington and in 1 to Atlantic’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule own, operate, and maintain town border Fayette County, Ky., and the deterio No. 232. stations at or near the west corporate rated condition of the existing 8-inch (B) Pending such hearing and deci limits of New Berlin and the west cor pipeline. sion thereon, Supplement No. 1 to A t porate limits of Loami and from said The estimated cost of construction of lantic’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 232 town border stations Applicant will con the proposed replacement segment is is hereby suspended and the use thereof struct gas distribution mains for the pur $363,500, which will be financed by the deferred until October 5,1966, and there pose of operating and maintaining gas sale of notes and common stock to The after until such further time as it is made distribution systems to serve said villages Columbia Gas System, Inc., Applicant’s effective in the manner prescribed by the of new Berlin and Loami and their parent company. Natural Gas Act. environs. Protests or petitions to intervene may (C) Neither the supplement hereby The total estimated volumes of nat be filed with the Federal Power Com Suspended, nor the rate schedule sought ural gas necessary to meet Applicant’s mission, Washington, D.C., 20426, in ac annual and peak day requirements for to be altered thereby, shall be changed cordance with the rules of practice and the initial 3-year period of proposed op procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the until this proceeding has been disposed erations are stated to be: of or until the period of suspension has regulations under the Natural Gas Act expired, unless otherwise ordered by the (157.10) on or before June 2,1966. First Second Third Commission. year year year Take further notice that, pursuant to (D) Notices of intervention or peti the authority contained in and subject tions to intervene may be filed with the Annual (McO------52,983 75,513 84,874 to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Power Commission, Washington, Peak day (Mcf)______503 720 811 Federal Power Commission by sections D.C., 20426, in accordance with the rules 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6925

Commission’s rules of practice and pro aration and metering equipment. Pur sin Pipe Line Co. (Respondent) to es cedure, a hearing will be held without suant to contracts between Applicant tablish physical connection of its trans further notice before the Commission on and Texas Eastern and Applicant and portation facilities with the facilities this application if no protest or petition Humble Oil & Refining Co. (Humble), proposed to be constructed by Applicant to intervene is filed within the time re dated November 1, 1965, and March 17, and to sell and deliver to Applicant vol quired herein, if the Commission on its 1966, respectively, Applicant proposes to umes of natural gas for resale and dis own review of the matter finds that a purchase quantities of natural gas from tribution in Forest City and Oregon, Mo., grant of the certificate is required by Humble and through the use of the afore all as more fully set forth in the applica the public convenience and necessity. If mentioned facilities to sell and deliver tion which is on file with the Commis a protest or petition for leave to inter quantities of natural gas to Texas East sion and open to public inspection. vene is timely filed, or if the Commission ern. The agreement between Applicant Applicant states that Forest City and on its own motion believes that a formal and Humble provides for the receipt by Oregon are located approximately 38 hearing is required, further notice of Applicant at its aforementioned gas miles from Maryville, Mo., and approxi such hearing will be duly given. sweetening plant of a minimum of 3 mil mately 11 miles from Respondent’s trans Under the procedure herein provided lion cubic feet of sour gas per day during mission line. Applicant further states for, unless otherwise advised, it will be the first 4 years and 1 y2 million cubic that the 1960 census shows the popula unnecessary for Applicant to appear or feet of sour gas per day thereafter and tion of Forest City to be 435 and Oregon be represented at the hearing. the agreement between Applicant and to be 887. J o s e p h H . G u t r id e , Texas Eastern provides for a daily con Applicant proposes to construct a new Secretary. tract quantity of 1,000 Mcf of gas, to be gelded steel, coated, and wrapped dis sold at the rate of 13 cents per Mcf (14.65 [F.R. Doc. 66-5099; Filed, May 10, 1966; tribution system to provide natural gas 8:45 a.m.] p.s.i.a.) and delivered to Texas Eastern service to the residents and commercial at a point on its 24-inch main transmis establishments of Forest City and Ore sion line in Cass County, Tex. gon. Applicant states that service to the [Docket No. CP66-282] The total estimated cost of Applicant’s cities of Forest City and Oregon will NATIONAL SULPHUR CO. proposed facilities is $148,600, which will require approximately 13.5 miles of be financed through a bank loan. lateral construction, extending southeast Notice of Application Protests or petitions to intervene may from a point of Respondent’s transmis be filed with the Federal Power Commis sion line west of Bigelow, to a proposed M ay 4, 1966. sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord town border station to be located at the Take notice that on April 29, 1966, ance with the rules of practice and pro northwest city limits of Forest City, and National^ Sulphur Co. (Applicant), 201 cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the reg from there, east to a proposed town Wall Building, Midland, Tex., filed in ulations under the Natural Gas Act border station located at the west city Docket No. CP66-282 an application pur (157.10) on or before June 2,1966. limits of Oregon. Applicant further suant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Take further notice that, pursuant to states that Respondent has agreed to Act for a certificate of public conven the authority contained in and subject to construct, pursuant to its 10-cent for ience and necessity authorizing the con the jurisdiction conferred upon the Fed mula, 2.3 miles of the required lateral. struction and operation of certain nat eral Power Commission by sections 7 The total estimated volumes of natural ural gas facilities and the sale of natural and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the gas necessary to meet Applicant’s annual gas to Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., Commission’s rules of practice and pro and peak day requirements for the initial all as more fully set forth in the appli cedure, a hearing will be held without 3-year period of proposed operations are cation which is on file with the Commis further notice before the Commission on stated to be: sion and open to public inspection. this application if no protest or petition Applicant’s original application for a to intervene is filed within the time re First Second Third certificate of public convenience and quired herein, if the Commission on its year year year necessity, filed on January 24, 1966, was own review of the matter finds that a submitted as an independent producer grant of the certificate is required by the Annual (M cf)...... 50,000 64,000 68,700 application seeking authorization for sale public convenience and necessity. I f a Peak day (M cf)...... 520 600 700 of natural gas to Texas Eastern and was protest or petition for leave to inter designated Docket No. CI66-641 (31 F.R. vene is timely filed, or if the Commission The total estimated cost of Applicant’s 2906). By letter dated April 5, 1966, the on its own motion believes that a formal proposed transmission and distribution Commission advised Applicant that, from hearing is required, further notice of facilities is $386,800, which cost will be the information in such application, it such hearing will be duly given. financed from internally generated appeared that the proposal involved fa Under the procedure herein provided funds. cilities and operations of a transmission, for, unless otherwise advised, it will be Protests or petitions to intervene may rather than gathering, nature and that unnecessary for Applicant to appear or be filed with the Federal .Power Com such application had therefore been given be represented at the hearing. mission, Washington, D.C., 20426, in a natural gas pipeline application desig accordance with the rules of practice nation as Docket No. CP66-282. In said J o s e ph H . G u t r id e , Secretary. and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on letter, the Commission requested advice or before June 2, 1966. as to whether Applicant desired to prose [F.R. Doc. 66-5100; Filed, May 10, 1966; cute the application as a filing under 8:45 a.m.] J o s e p h H . G u t r id e , § 157.14 of the regulations or withdraw Secretary. the application. On April 29, 1966, Ap [Docket No. CP66-338] [F.R. Doc. 66-5101; Filed, May 10, 1966; plicant filed a supplement to its original 8:45 a.m.] application requesting that the supple ST. JOSEPH LIGHT & POWER CO. AND ment, together with the original aplica- MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE tion on file, be accepted as an abbrevi CO. ated application under § 157.7 of the reg FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION ulations under the Natural Gas Act. Notice of Application Specifically, Applicant proposes to con [Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder struct and operate 10.3 miles of 4-inch M a y 4,1966. License 968] pipeline extending from the tailgate of Take notice that on April 27, 1966, St. CARGOFAST PACIFIC, INC. its gas sweetening plant located in the Joseph Light & Power Co. (Applicant), Queen City (Smackover) Field, Cass 520 Francis Street, St. Joseph, Mo., Revocation of License County, Tex., in a southeasterly direction 64502, filed in Docket No. CP66-338 an Whereas, Cargofast Pacific, Inc., 396 to a point on Texas Eastern’s 24-inch application pursuant to section 7(a) of Broadway, New York, N.Y., 10013, no transmission pipeline also located in Cass the Natural Gas Act for an order of the longer wishes to operate as an inde County, Tex., together with certain sep Commission directing Michigan Wiscon pendent ocean freight forwarder; and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VpL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6926 NOTICES

Whereas, Cargofast Pacific, Inc., has VOLUNTARY TANKER PLAN FOR THE (2) Western Regional Renegotiation returned Independent Ocean Freight CONTRIBUTION OF TANKER CA Board, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Los Forwarder License No. 968 to the Com PACITY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE Angeles, Calif., 90012. mission; and Dated: May 6, 1966. Whereas, by statement dated April 14, REQUIREMENTS 1966, Cargofast Pacific, Inc., has re Deletions From Membership L aw rence E. H ar tw ig , quested the revocation of its Independ Chairman. ent Ocean Freight Forwarder License Pursuant to section 708 of the Defense [F.R. Doc. 66-5123; Filed May 10, 1966; No. 968; Production Act 1950, as amended, there 8:47 a.m.] Now therefore, by virtue of authority are published herewith the following vested in me by the Federal Maritime deletions from the list of companies Commission as set forth in Manual of which have accepted the request to par Orders, Commission Order No. 201.1, ticipate in the voluntary plan entitled, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE section 6.03 : “Voluntary Tanker Plan for the Contri It is ordered, That the Independent butions of Tanker Capacity for National COMMISSION Ocean Freight Forwarder License No. 968 [812-1899] of Cargofast Pacific, Inc., be and is herè- Defense Requirements,” as amended. b yr evoked, effective this date. The request and complete list of accept AMERICAN-AMICABLE LIFE I t is further ordered, That a copy of ances were published in 24 F.R. 4119, INSURANCE CO. this order be published in the F ederal May 21, 1959 and 28 F.R. 12681, Novem R egister and served on the licensee. ber 28, 1963. Notice of Filing of Application for Deletio ns Order Exempting Transaction Be James E. M aztjre, Director, Bernuth, Lembcke Co., Inc., New York 17, tween Affiliated Persons Bureau of Domestic Regulation. N.Y. Colonial Steamship Corp., New York 4, N.Y. M a y 5, 1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-5131; Piled, May 10, 1966; Eagle Carriers, Inc., New York 17, N.Y. Notice is hereby given that American- 8:48 a.m.] Hartol Petroleum Corp., New York 20, N.Y. Amicable Life Insurance Co. (“Appli Hedge Haven Farms, Inc., Clinton, N.J. cant” ) , Alico Center, Waco, Tex., an Mayflower Steamship Corp., 24 State Street, Alabama corporation and successor by New York 4, N.Y. Metro Petroleum Shipping Co., New York 4, merger to American Life Insurance Co. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY N.Y. (hereinafter “Applicant” may also refer Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., New York 4, to the predecessor company), has filed an PLANNING N.Y. application pursuant to section 17(b) of Oceanic Petroleum Carriers, Inc., c/o Marine the Investment Company Act of 1940 VOLUNTARY TANKER PLAN FOR THE Carriers Corp., New York 4, N.Y. (“Act”). Applicant seeks an order of CONTRIBUTION OF TANKER CA Petrol Shipping Corp., New York 4, N.Y. the Commission exempting from the pro Red Hills Corp., c/o Southoil, Inc., Jackson visions of section 17(a) the transfer of PACITY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE ville, Fla. REQUIREMENTS Terminal Transport Corp., New York 17, N.Y. 76,500 shares of stock of United Services United States Shipping Corp., New York 4, Life Insurance Co. (“ United Services” ) Additions to Membership N.Y. by Applicant to Insurance Securities (Sec. 708, 64 Stat. 818, as amended; 50 U.S.C. Trust Fund (“ISTF”) in exchange for Pursuant to section 708 of the Defense 85,770 shares of stock of Gulf Life In Production Act of 1950, as amended, App. Supp. 2158; E.O. 10480, Aug. 14, 1953, surance Co. (“ Gulf Life” ). All inter there are published herewith additional 18 F.R. 4939; Reorganization Plan No. 1 of ested persons are referred to the appli companies which have accepted the re 1958, 23 F.R. 4991, as amended; E.O. 11051, Sept. 27,1962, 27 F.R. 9683) cation on file with the Commission for quest to participate in the voluntary plan a statement of the representations made entitled, “ Voluntary Tanker Plan for the Dated: May 5,1966.' therein, which are summarized below. Contribution of Tanker Capacity for Na F arris B r yant, At all times pertinent hereto, Appli tional Defense Requirements,” as amend Director, cant and IS TF each owned 5 percent or ed, March 20, 1958. The request and Office of Emergency Planning. more of the stock of Gulf Life with the complete list of earlier acceptances were result that, under section 2(a) (3) of the published in 24 F.R. 4119, May 21, 1959 [F.R. Doc. 66-5127; Filed, May 10, 1966; Act, each was and is an affiliate of an and 28 F.R. 12681, November 28,1963. 8:48 a.m.] affiliate of the other. Section 17 of the Continental Oil Co., 30 Rockefeller Plaza, Act, as here pertinent, makes it unlaw New York, N.Y., 10020. ful for an affiliated person (Applicant) Hendy International Co., 612 South Flower of an affiliated person (Gulf Life) of a Street, Los Angeles, Calif., 90017. Maritime Overseas Oil Carriers, Inc., 511 Fifth RENEGOTIATION BOARD registered investment company (IS T F ), Avenue, New York, N.Y., 10017. STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION to sell to or buy from such investment Mount Washington Tanker Co., 655 Madison company any security unless the Com Avenue, New York, N.Y., 10021. Location of Western Regional Board mission upon application grants an ex Pure Oil Co., Inc., 200 East Golf Road, Pala emption from such prohibition, after tine, 111., 60067. The Statement of Organization pub finding that the terms of the transaction Texaco Co., Inc., 135 East 42d Street, New lished in the issue of September 28, 1956 are reasonable and fair and do not in York, N.Y., 10017. Transwestem Associates, 1 Chase Manhattan (F.R. Doc. 56-7859; 21 F.R. 7467), as volve overreaching and that the trans Plaza, New York, N.Y., 10005. amended in the issues of July 23, 1957 action is consistent with the policy of the registered investment company and (Sec. 708, 64 Stat. 818, as amended; 50' U.S.C. (F R . Doc. 57-6008; 22 F.R. 5848), the general purposes of the Act. App. Supp. 2158; E.O. 10480, Aug. 14, 1953, March 28, 1961 (F.R. Doc. 61-2702; 26 18 FR. 4939; Reorganization Plan No. 1 of On February 3, 1964, Applicant agreed 1958, 23 F.R. 4991, as amended; E.O. 11051, F.R. 2632), January 20, 1962 (F.R. Doc. to exchange 51,000 shares of United Sept. 27, 1962, 27 F.R. 9683) 62-671; 27 F.R. 641), and January 17, Services which it held for 77,796 shares of stock of Gulf Life. For purposes of Dated: May 5,1966. 1963 (F.R. Doc. 63-497; 28 F.R. 468), is hereby further amended as follows: the exchange the shares of United Serv F arris B r y an t, ices and Gulf Life were valued at their Director, Section 3(b) is amended by deleting then current market values of $90 and Office of Emergency Planning. subparagraph (2) under the heading $59 per share respectively. Subsequent [F.R. Doc. 66-5126; Filed, May 10, 1966; Location and inserting in lieu thereof the to the transaction both United Services 8:47 a m .] following: and Gulf Life paid stock dividends which

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6927

makes the blocks of stock exchanged, as point of mailing) upon Applicant at the First & Merchants National Bank presently constituted, 76,500 shares of address stated above. Proof of such of Richmond, Va______410, 000 United Services and 85,770 shares of service (by affidavit or in case of an First National Bank of Mansfield, Gulf Life. O h io .______200,000 attorney at law by certificate) shall be First Security National Bank & In order to resolve certain uncertain filed contemporaneously with the request. Trust Co., Lexington, K y______450, 000 ties caused by the transaction which may At any time after said date, as provided Glen National Bank, Watkins have been in violation of section 17(a) by Rule 0-5 of the rules and regulations Glen, N .Y ______50, 000 of the Act, including whether ISTF, the promulgated under the Act, an order dis Huntington National Bank of Co registered investment company, could posing of the application herein may be lumbus, Ohio______1, 600, 000 elect to rescind the exchange relying issued by the Commission upon the basis Irving Trust Co., New York, N.Y_ 3,900, 000 upon section 47 of the Act, ISTF was of the information stated in said appli Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., New York, N .Y ______5,900,000 afforded the opportunity on December cation, unless an order for hearing upon Mellon National Bank & Trust 17, 1965, either to rescind the transac said application shall be issued upon Co., Pittsburgh, Pa______7, 400, 000 tion or to deliver to Applicant a release request or upon the Commission’s own Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of from the date of the exchange through motion. New York, N.Y______27, 580, 000 the date of an order of the Commission Pittsburgh National Bank, Pitts approving, prospectively from the date of [ seal] O rval L. D tjB ois, burgh, P a______2,200, 000 the order, the exchange and retention of Secretary. The Charleston National Bank, the stock. IS TF elected not to rescind. [F.R. Doc. 66-5106; Filed, May 10, 1966; Charlestown, W. Va______1, 200, 000 8:46 a.m.] The Cleveland Trust Co., Cleve The release, which is conditioned upon land, Ohio______1,300,000 the entry of an order by the Commission, The First Huntington National is a waiver by Applicant and ISTF of [File No. 70-4378] Bank, Huntington, W. Va_____ 550, 000 any and all liabilities or claims for The First National City Bank of rescission in respect of the exchange in COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC. of New York, N.Y ______5, 900, OOO February 1964. The National Bank of Commerce, Applicant states that the parties wish Notice of Proposed Issue and Sale Charlestown, W. Va______200,000 to continue to own the blocks of stock of Short-Term Notes to Banks The National Bank of Toledo, which were acquired in the exchange O h io ______300, 000 M a y 5, 1966. The National City Bank of Cleve transaction. It is asserted that the terms land, Ohio______400, 000 of the transaction were fair to the parties Notice is hereby given that the Colum bia Gas System, Inc. (“ Columbia” ), 120 The Ohio Citizens Trust Co., in February 1964, the values ascribed Toledo, Ohio______i______!____ 300, 000 being the then current market price of East 41st Street, New York, N.Y., 10017, The Ohio National Bank of Co the stocks, and continuation of the trans a registered holding company, has filed lumbus, Ohio______2,100, 000 action would be fair. The proposed ex a declaration with this Commission pur The Richland Trust Co., Mans change is in the ratio of approximately suant to the Public Utility Holding Com field, O hio.______200,000 pany Act of 1935 ( “Act” ) designating The Toledo Trust Co., Toledo, 1.12 shares of Gulf Life common stock O h io ______1, 200, 000 for each share of United Services com sections 6(a) and 7 thereof as applicable to the proposed transactions. All inter The Union National Bank, Pitts mon stock, and it is therefore based burgh, Pa______750, 000 upon relative per share values of approx ested persons are referred to the decla imately 1.12 for the United Services com ration, which is summarized below, for Total______80,000,000 mon stock to 1.00 for the Gulf Life a complete statement of the proposed common stock. In the 30-day period transactions. The fees and expenses to be paid by immediately preceding the date of filing Columbia proposes to issue from time Columbia in connection with the issue of the application on January 12, 1966, to time, prior to October 17, 1966, up to and sale of the notes are estimated at the ratios of the daily means of the re $80,000,000 face amount of its unsecured $400. It is stated that no State com ported bid and asked quotations for short-term notes to the banks named mission and no Federal commission, such stocks in the over-the-counter mar below. The notes will bear interest at other than this Commission, has juris ket ranged between 1.02 and 1.20, and an annual rate of 5% percent, the cur diction over the proposed transactions. averaged 1.10, for the United Services rent prime rate for commercial loans. Notice is further given that any inter shares to L00 for the Gulf Life shares. The notes will mature as follows: $25,- ested person may, not later than May 23, Applicant represents that, except for 000,000 on February 28, 1967; $25,000,000 1966, request in writing that a hearing the common ownership of Gulf Life, on March 31, 1967; and $30,000,000 on be held on such matter, stating the na neither Applicant nor their parent cor April 28, 1967, and will be prepayable, in ture of his interest, the reasons for such poration, The Greatamerica Corp., has whole or in part, without penalty, except request, and the issues of fact or law had any business dealings with ISTF that prepayments cannot be made with raised by said declaration which he de nor are they affiliated with ISTF through funds borrowed from banks at a lower sires to controvert; or he may request any other relationship. The acquisition interest rate. Columbia will use the pro that he be notified if the Commission and continued retention of United Serv ceeds from the sale of the notes to make should order a hearing thereon. Any ices stock is represented to have been and open-account advances to certain of its such request should be .addressed: Sec to be consistent with IS TF’s investment subsidiary companies to enable them to retary, Securities and Exchange Com policy of investing in the stocks of insur purchase inventory gas for sale during mission, Washington, D.C., 20549. A ance companies. the 1966-67 winter season. The making copy of such request should be served Notice is further given that any inter of such advances is the subject of a personally or by mail (airmail if the per ested person may, not later than May 20, separate filing with this Commission (Holding Company Act Release No. son being served is located more than 1966, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Commis 500 miles from the point of mailing) sion in writing a request for a hearing 15432). upon the declarant at the above-stated on the matter accompanied by a state The maximum face amount of notes ment as to the nature of his interest, the to be sold to each of the lending banks address, and proof of service (by affi reason for such request and the issues is as follows: davit or, in case of an attorney at law, of fact or law proposed to be contro Bankers Trust Co., New York, by certificate) should be filed contem verted, or he may request that he be N.Y------_1__ $3,900,000 poraneously with the request. At any Brown Brothers, Harriman & Co., notified if the Commission shall order a time after said date, the declaration, as hearing thereon. Any such communica New York, N.Y______750, 000 tion should be addressed: Secretary, Chemical Bank New York Trust filed or as it may be amended, may be Securities and Exchange Commission, Co., New York, N.Y______10,140, 000 permitted to become effective as provided Washington, D.C., 20549. A copy of such City National Bank & Trust Co., in Rule 23 of the general rules and regu request shall be served personally or by Columbus, Ohio______1, 000, 000 lations promulgated under the Act, or mail (airmail if the person being served First-City National Bank of Bing the Commission may grant exemption is located more than 500 miles from the hamton, N.Y______120,000 from such rules as provided in Rules

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 No. 91----- 6 6928 NOTICES

20(a) and 100 thereof or take such other Applicant, which was organized on 120 South La Salle Street, Chicago, HI., action as it may deem appropriate. June 10, 1954, registered under section 60604, a Delaware corporation and a 8(a) of the Act by filing a Notification of registered open-end diversified invest For the Commission (pursuant to Registration on December 5, 1960. Ap ment company, and Atlantic Research delegated authority). plicant states that its securities are Corp. ("Atlantic” ) , Shirley Highway [ s e a l ] O rval L . D u B o is , owned beneficially by 53 persons, none and Edsall Road, Alexandria, Va., 22314, Secretary. of whom is a company. Applicant states a Virginia corporation (hereinafter col [F U . Doc. 66-5107; Filed, May 10, 1966; further that it is not making and that it lectively called “applicants’’!, have filed 8:46 a.m.] does not presently propose to make a a joint application pursuant to section public offering of its securities. 17(b) of the Investment Company Act of Section 3 (c)(1 ) of the Act excepts 1940 ( “Act” ) . Applicants request an [24C-2728] from the definition of an investment order of the Commission exempting from DUNFEE SAVINGS & LEASE company any issuer whose outstanding the provisions of section 17(a) of the Act securities (other than short-term paper) a transaction incident to a settlement of Order Regarding Temporary are beneficially owned by not more than the case of Television-Electronics Fund, Suspension 100 persons and which is not making and Inc. v. Atlantic Research Corp. et al., in does not presently propose to make a the U.S. Court for the Eastern District M a y 5,1966. public offering of its securities. of Virginia, Alexandria Division, Civil The Securities and Exchange Commis Section 8 (f) of the Act provides, in Action No. 2945. All interested persons sion, by order dated February 17, 1966, pertinent part, that whenever the Com are referred to the application for a pursuant to Regulation A under the Se mission upon application finds that a reg statement of applicants’ representations, curities Act of 1933, temporarily sus istered investment company has ceased which are summarized below: pended a Regulation A exemption from to be an investment company, it shall so On August 4, 1961, Television entered registration under the Securities Act declare by order and upon the taking into a contract with Atlantic for the pur with respect to a proposed public offering effect of such order, the registration of chase of 115,000 shares of Atlantic of securities by Thomas Dunfee, doing such company shall cease to be in effect. common stock for $4,025,000. At that business as Dunfee Savings & Lease, 8113 Notice is further given that any inter time Atlantic had outstanding approxi Troost Avenue, Kansas City, Mo. There ested person may, not later than May mately 1,924,211 shares of common after, Dunfee requested a hearing on the 24, 1966, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the stock, including the shares covered by question whether the suspension should Commission in writing a request for a the contract. A certificate for such be vacated or made permanent, and the hearing on the matter accompanied by a shares, constituting approximately 5.98 matter was scheduled for hearing on statement as to the nature of his interest, percent of the then outstanding Atlantic May 2,1966. the reason for such request and the is stock, was duly delivered to Television. In a letter dated April 22 and received sues of fact or law proposed to be con On May 9,1963, Television commenced on April 25, 1966, Dunfee requested that troverted, or he may request that he be Civil Action No. 2945 against Atlantic the hearing not be held (it was there notified if the Commission should order and others, seeking rescission of the con upon canceled) ; and he further re a hearing thereon. Any such communi tract or money damages. The com quested withdrawal of his notification cation should be addressed: Secretary, plaint, as amended, alleged in substance of proposed offering previously filed Securities and Exchange Commission, that Television was induced to enter herein pursuant to Regulation A. Washington, D.C., 20549. A copy of into the contract to purchase the 115,000 I t is ordered, In accordance with Rule such request shall be served personally shares of Atlantic through misrepre 255(e) of Regulation A, that the request or by mail (airmail if the person being sentations of, and omissions to state, for withdrawal is denied, and. served is located more than 500 miles material facts on the part of the de I t is further ordered, Pursuant to Rule from the point of mailing) upon Ap fendants, and that agreements for the 261(b) of Regulation A that the tempo plicant. Proof of such service (by affi registration of the shares under the Se rary suspension order is hereby made davit or in case of an attorney at law curities Act of 1933 were not performed. permanent. by certificate) shall be filed contem Television also contended that the con poraneously with the request. At any tract was never consummated. By the Commission. time after said date, as provided by After filing the complaint, the defend [ s e a l] O rval L . D u B o is , Rule 0-5 of the rules and regulations ants moved the court to strike the com Secretary. promulgated under the Act, an order plaint for failure to state a cause of [FJR. Doc. 66-5108; Filed, May 10, 1966; disposing of the application herein may action. This motion was denied. Dis 8:46 a.m.] be issued by the Commission upon the covery proceedings followed and were basis of the information stated in said conducted over a period of more than 2 application, unless an order for hearing years. The case was set for trial on July [811-1005] upon said application shall be issued 8,1966. ENTERPRISE SECURITIES FUND, INC. upon request or upon the Commission’s During the entire period that the liti own motion. gation has been pending there have been Notice of Application for Order De For the Commission (pursuant to dele negotiations for settlement from time to claring Company Has Ceased To gated authority). time between Television and Atlantic. Be Investment Company Numerous offers and counteroffers have [ s e a l ] O rval L . D u B o is , been made and rejected. The direct M a y 5, 1966. Secretary. negotiations which ended in settlement Notice is hereby given that Enterprise [F.R. Doc. 66-5109; Filed, May 10, 1966; commenced several months ago, and the Securities Fund, Inc. (“Applicant” ), 4 8:46 a.m.] offers and counteroffers made during Delcrest Court, St. Louis, Mo., a Missouri that period were reviewed and discussed corporation and a registered open-end fully by the management and board of diversified management investment com [812-1948] directors of each side. The board of di pany, has filed an application pursuant to TELEVISION-ELECTRONICS FUND, rectors of Television and Atlantic have formally approved the settlement. section 8(f) of the Investment Company INC., AND ATLANTIC RESEARCH Act of 1940 (“Act”) for an order of the In further support of their applica Commission declaring that Applicant CORP. tion, applicants assert that the settle has ceased to be an investment company Notice of Filing of Application for ment was arrived at after extended arm’s-length negotiations conducted in by reason of the exception afforded by Order Exempting Proposed Trans section 3(c) (1) of the Act. All inter good faith without undue influence by ested persons are referred to the appli actions either party upon the other. The judge, cation on file with the Commission for M a y 5,1966, at several pretrial conferences com a statement of the representations stated Notice is hereby given that Television- mencing as early as July 1964, informed therein. Electronics Fund, Inc. ( “Television” ), the parties that he desired settlement

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6929

discussions to be actively conducted and should be addressed; Secretary, Securi ing: Such merchandise as is dealt in by was kept fully informed of the status of ties and Exchange Commission, Wash wholesale, retail, and chain grocery and these discussions. ington, D.C., 20549. A copy of such re food business houses, from Southboro, On April 22, 1966, Television and A t quest shall be served personally or by Mass., to Portland, Lewiston, and lantic reached an agreement for the mail (air mail if the person being served Bangor, Maine, with return of empty settlement of the suit which provided is located more than 500 miles from the containers, returned or rejected mer for the payment by Atlantic of $163,000 point of mailing) upon applicants at the chandise, service to be performed in be to cover the expenses incurred by Tele addresses stated above. Proof of such half of one shipper, Columbia Markets, vision for the conduct of the litigation, service by affidavit (or in case of an at Portland, Maine, under a continuing and for Atlantic to deliver an additional torney at law by certificate) shall be filed contract, for 150 days. Supporting 37,500 shares of its common stock to contemporaneously with the request. At shipper: Columbia Markets, 1100 Television. The settlement also pro any time after said date, as provided by Brighton Avenue, Portland, Maine. vided for the release of all claims be Bide 0-5 of the rules and regulations Send protests to: Donald G. Weiler, Dis tween Atlantic and Television and for promulgated under the Act, an order trict Supervisor, Bureau of Operations Atlantic to undertake to register the disposing of the application herein may and Compliance, Interstate Commerce additional shares under the Securities be issued by the Commission upon the Commission, Room 307, 76 Pearl Street, Act of 1933. Definitive terms of the basis of the information stated in said Portland, Maine, 04112. settlement agreement as to the number application, unless an order for hearing No. MC 66562 (Sub-No. 2167 T A ), filed of Atlantic shares to be transferred to upon such application shall be issued May 3, 1966. Applicant: RAILWAY Television in addition to those covered upon request or upon the Commission’s EXPRESS AGENCY, INCORPORATED, by the contract of August 1961 were own motion. 219 East 42d Street, New York, N.Y., agreed to on April 21, 1966. The closing For the Commission (pursuant to dele 10017. Applicant’s representative: John price of Atlantic stock on the American gated authority). H. Engle, 2413 Broadway, Kansas City, Stock Exchange on April 21, 1966 was Mo., 64108. Authority sought to operate $14.50 per share. The closing price of [ seal! O rval L. D uB o is, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Atlantic stock on the American Stock Secretary. over regular routes, transporting: Gen Exchange on April 29, 1966 was $14.75 [F.R. Doc. 66-5110; Filed, May 10, 1966; eral commodities, moving in express per share. . The agreement to settle the 8:46 a.m.] service, (1) between Baton Rouge, La., litigation was first made public on April and New Orleans, La., from Baton Rouge 22, 1966. Pursuant to a stipulation en over Louisiana Highway 30 to Darrow, tered into by the parties, the Court La., thence over Louisiana Highway 22 to entered an order dismissing the case on INTERSTATE COMMERCE Burnside, La., thence over Louisiana April 22, 1966. Highway 44 to junction with U,S. High As stated above, Television claims that COMMISSION way 61, and thence over U.S. Highway 61 its contract to purchase 115,000 shares of [Notice 179] to New Orleans, and return over the Atlantic stock was never fully consum same route, serving the intermediate mated due to Atlantic’s default. How MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY points of Geismar, Burnside, Lutcher, ever, such shares were delivered to Tele AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS Reserve, Good Hope, and Kenner, La.; vision under the contract and are still (2) between Hammond, La., and Mc- held by Television. Therefore Atlantic M a y 6, 1966. Comb, Miss., from Hammond, over U.S. appears to be an affiliated person of The following are notices of filing of Highway 51 to McComb, and return over Television under section 2(a) (3) of the applications for temporary authority the same route, serving the intermediate Act because of Television’s present own undef section 210a(a) of the Interstate points of Independence, Amite, Rose- ership of more than 5 percent of A t Commerce Act provided for under the land, Tangipahoa, and Kentwood, La., lantic’s outstanding common stock. new rides in Ex Parte No. M C 67 (49 and Osyka and Magnolia, Miss.; (3) be In effect, section 17 (a) of the Act, as C FR Part 240), published in the F ederal tween Jackson, Miss., and Meridian, here pertinent, makes it unlawful for R egister, issue of April 27,1965, effective Miss., from Jackson over U.S. Highway Atlantic as principal to sell any security July 1, 1965. These rules provide that 80 to Meridian, and return over the same or other property to Television in con protests to the granting of an applica route, serving the intermediate points of summation of the settlement agreement tion must be filed with the field official Brandon, Pelahatchie, Morton, Forest, unless the Commission, upon application named in the F ederal R egister publica Lake, Newton, and Hickory, Miss.; (4) under section 17(b) of the Act, grants tion, within 15 calendar days after the between Jackson, Miss., and Hattiesburg, an exemption from such prohibition. date of notice of the filing of the applica Miss., from Jackson, over U.S. Highway Under section 17 (b) of the Act the Com tion is published in the F ederal R egister. 49 to Hattiesburg, and return over the mission shall grant such application and One copy of such protest must be served same route, serving the intermediate issue an order of exemption if evidence on the applicant, or its authorized rep points of Mendenhall, Magee, Mount establishes that the terms of the pro resentative, if any, and the protest inust Olive, Collins, and Seminary, Miss. posed transaction, including the con certify that such service has been made. (5) Between Jackson, Miss., and Wes sideration to be paid or received, are The protest must be specific as to the son, Miss., from Jackson, over U.S. High reasonable and fair and do not involve service which such protestant can and way 51 to Wesson, and return over the overreaching on the part of any person will offer, and must consist of a signed same route, serving the intermediate concerned; if the proposed transaction original and six (6) copies. point of Hazlehurst, Miss.; (6) between is consistent with the policies of Tele A copy of the application is on file, and Indianola, Miss., and Itta Bena, Miss., vision as recited in its registration state can be examined, at the Office of the from Indianola, over U.S. Highway 49W ment and reports filed under the Act; Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com to Belzoni, Miss., thence over Mississippi and if the proposed transaction is con mission, Washington, D.C., and also in Highway 7 to Itta Bena, and return over sistent with the general purposes of the the field office to which protests are to be the same route, serving the intermediate Act. transmitted. points of Inverness and Belzoni, Miss.; Notice is further given that any in (7) serving Moorehead, Miss., as an off- M otor C arriers of P roperty terested person may, not later than May route point on applicant’s existing au 18,1966, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Com No. MC 16961 (Sub-No. 1 T A ), filed thority between Winona and Indianola, mission in writing a request on the mat May 3, 1966. Applicant: COLUMBIA Miss., MC 66562 Sub 1274; (8) between ter accompanied by a statement as to TRANSPORTATION CO., 1000 Congress Indianola, Miss., and Tutwiler, Miss., the nature of his interest, the reason for Street, Portland, Maine. Applicant’s from Indianola, over U.S. Highway 49W such request and the issues, if any, of representative: Francis E. Barrett, 25 to Tutwiler, and return over the same fact or law proposed to be controverted, Bryant Avenue, East Milton (Boston), route, serving the intermediate points of or he may request that he be notified if Mass., 02186. Authority sought to op Drew, Parchman, and Ruleville, Miss.; the Commission should order a hearing erate as a contract carrier, by motor (9) serving Ackerman, Miss., as an off- thereon. Any such communication vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- route point on applicant’s existing au-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6930 NOTICES thority between Winona, Miss., and Aber U.S. Highway 31E, thence over U.S. High Highway 82 to junction with Ne deen, Miss., MC 66562 Sub 2001 TA, via way 3 IE to Bardstown, and return over braska Highway 33; then east on Ne Mississippi Highway 15; (10) between the same route, serving the intermediate braska Highway 33 to intersection with Memphis, Tenn., and Lambert, Miss., point of Hodgenville, Ky.; (18) between U.S. Highway 7.7; then north on U.S. from Memphis, over U.S. Highway 51 to East St. Louis, 111., and Sparta, HI., from Highway 77 to intersection with U.S. Como, Miss., thence over Mississippi East St. Louis over U.S. Highway 460 Interstate Highway 80; then nver U.S. Highway 310 to Crenshaw, thence over to Illinois Highway 13, thence over Illi Interstate Highway 80 to Omaha, for Mississippi Highway 3 to Lambert, and nois Highway 13 to junction with Illinois 150 days. Restrictions: The service to be return over Mississippi State Highway 3 Highway 4, thence over Illinois Highway performed shall be limited to that which to Marks, Miss., thence over Mississippi 4 to Sparta, and return over the same is auxiliary to or supplemental of ex Highway 6 to Batesville, Miss., thence route, serving the intermediate points of press service of the Railway Express over U.S. Highway 51 to Memphis, Tenn., New Athens and Freeburg, 111.; (19) be Agency, Inc. - Shipments transported serving the intermediate points of Her tween Champaign, 111., and Tuscola, 111., shall be limited to those moving on nando, Senatobia, Como, Crenshaw, from Champaign, over U.S. Highway 45 through bills of lading or express re Sledge, Marks, Batesville, and Sardis, to Tuscola, and return over the same ceipts. Supporting shippers: The appli route; (20) between Champaign, 111., and cation is supported by statements from Miss. 59 shippers, which may be examined here (11) Serving Rosedale, Miss., as an off- Rantoul, HI., from Champaign, over U.S. Highway 45 to Rantoul, and return over at the Interstate Commerce Commis route point on applicant’s existing au sion in Washington, D.C. Send protests thority between Memphis, Tenn., and the same route; for 150 days. Restric tions: 1. The service to be performed by to: Anthony Chiusano, District Super Greenville, Miss., MC 66562 Sub 2081 visor, Bureau of Operations and Com TA, via Mississippi Highway 8;^(12) be the applicant shall be limited to that pliance, Interstate Commerce Commis tween Memphis, Tenn., and Millington, which is auxiliary to or supplemental of sion, 346 Broadway, New York, N.Y., Tenn., from Memphis, over U.S. High express service of the Railway Express 10013. way 51 to Millington, Tenn., and return Agency, Inc. 2. Shipments transported by applicant shall be limited to those No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. 524 T A ), filed over the same route, serving all inter May 3, 1966. Applicant: QUALITY mediate points; (13) between Jackson, moving on through bills of lading or ex press receipts. Supporting shippers: CARRIERS, INC., 100 South Calumet Tenn., and Fulton, Ky., from Jackson, Street, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, over U.S. Highway 45 to junction of U.S. The application is supported by state Wis., 53105. Applicant’s representative: Highway 45E and U.S. Highway 45W, ments from 127 shippers, which may be Fred H. Figge (same address as above). thence over U.S. Highway 45E to Fulton, examined here at the Interstate Com merce Commission in Washington, D.C. Authority sought to operate as a common Ky., and return over U.S. Highway 45W carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular to junction with U.S. Highway 51, thence Send protests to: Anthony Chiusano, over U.S. Highway 51 to intersection District Supervisor, Bureau of Opera routes, transporting: Fruit juices, in bulk, in stainless steel tank vehicles, with Tennessee Highway 21, thence over tions and Compliance, Interstate Com Tennessee Highway 21 to intersection merce Commission, 346 Broadway, New from Chicago, 111., to Muskogee, Okla., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: W ag with Tennessee Highway 78, thence over York, N.Y., 10013. Tennessee Highway 78 to Dyersburg, No. MC 66562 (Sub-No. 2168 T A ), filed ner Industries, Inc., 1331 South 55th Court, Cicero, 111., 60650/ Send protests Tenn., thence over U.S. Highway 51 to May 3, 1966. Applicant: RAILWAY EX to: W. F. Sibbald, Jr., District Super Halls, Tenn., thence over U.S. Highway PRESS AGENCY, INCORPORATED, 219 51 to intersection with Tennessee High East 42d Street, New York, N.Y., 10017. visor, Bureau of Operations and Com way 21, thence over Tennessee Highway Applicant’s representative: John H. pliance, Interstate Commerce Commis 21 to intersection with U.S. Highway Engel, 2413 Broadway, Kansas City, Mo., sion, 108 West Wells Street, Room 511, 45W, thence over U.S. Highway 45W to 64108. Authority sought to operate as Milwaukee, Wis., 53203. Tennessee Highway 54, thence over Ten a common carrier, by motor vehicle,’ over No. MC 111103 (Sub-No. 17 T A ), filed nessee Highway 54 to Alamo, Tenn., regular routes, transporting: General May 3, 1966. Applicant: PROTECTIVE thence over Tennessee Highway 20 to commodities moving in express service, MOTOR SERVICE COMPANY, INC., Jackson, serving the intermediate points (1) between Omaha, Nebr., and Co 725-729 South Broad Street, Philadel of Milan, Greenfield, Martin, Ridgely, lumbus, Nebr., serving the intermediate phia, Pa., 19147. Applicant’s repre Dyersburg, Halls, Newbern, Trimble, points of Elkhorn, Valley, Fremont, sentative: Morris Cheston, Jr., Land Obion, Kenton, Rutherford, Dyer, Tren North Bend, Schuyler, and Richland, Title Building, Philadelphia, Pa., 19110. ton, and Alamo, Tenn., and the off-route Nebr.: From Omaha, westerly on U.S. Authority sought to operate as a con point of Tiptonville, Tenn.; (14) between Highway 30A to intersection with Ne tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir Jackson, Tenn., and Selmer, Tenn., from braska Highway 31; thence north over regular routes, transporting: Business Jackson, over U.S. Highway 45 to junc Nebraska Highway 31 to intersection papers, reports and records, checks in tion with Tennessee Highway 18, thence with Nebraska Highway 64; thence west the process of collection, payroll checks, over Tennessee Highway 18 to Bolivar, over Nebraska Highway 64 to junction coupons issued for the repayments of Tenn., thence over U.S. Highway 64 to with U.S. Highway 275; then over U.S. loans, bills or invoices issued by doctors Selmer, Tenn., and return over U.S. Highway 275 to intersection with U.S. and other professional practitioners and Highway 45 to Jackson, Tenn., serving Highway 30; thence west over U.S. High by commercial or industrial concerns; the intermediate points of Bolivar, and way 30 to Columbus, and return over the bank statements, ledger sheets, trial bal Henderson, Tenn.; (15) between Prince same route; (2) between Omaha, Nebr., ance statements and related accounting ton, Ky., and Dawson Springs, Ky., from and Concordia, Kans., serving the inter statements used in bank operations; de Princeton, over Kentucky Highway 91 to mediate points of Mead, Wahoo, Lincoln, posit and mithdrawal slips, counter junction with U.S. Highway 641, thence Beatrice, Wymore, Fairbury, Hebron, De checks and related depositor statements over U.S. Highway 641 to Sturgis, Ky., Witt, and Wilber, Nebr., and Belleville, used in the processing of demand and thence over U.S. Highway 641 to junction Washington, and Marysville, Kans.: savings deposits; and other related and with Kentucky Highway 109, thence over From Omaha, westerly over UB. High valuable papers used in the automated Kentucky Highway 109 to Dawson way 30A to junction with UB. Highway processing of bank and commercial and Springs, and return over the same route, 77; then over U.S. Highway 77 to Bea industrial accounting operations, be serving the intermediate points of Mar trice, Nebr.; then over U.S. Highway 136 tween Philadelphia, Pa., on the one hand, ion, Sturgis, and Providence, Ky. to intersection with U.S. Highway 81; and, on the other, points in New Jersey, (16) Between Hopkinsville, Ky., and then south over U.S. Highway 81 to Con for 180 days. Supporting shippers: The Cadiz, Ky., from Hopkinsville, over U.S. cordia, then north on U.S. Highway 81 to Philadelphia National Bank, Philadel Highway 68 to Gracey, Ky., thence over intersection with U.S. Highway 36; then phia, Pa.; Girard Trust Bank, Philadel U.S. Highway 68 (Kentucky Highway 80) east over U.S. Highway 36 to Marysville, phia, Pa.; Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust to Cadiz, and return over the same route; Kans.; then north on U.S. Highway 77 to Co., Broad & Walnut Streets, Philadel (17) between Greensburg, Ky., and Beatrice, Nebr.; then west over Nebraska phia, Pa.; The First Pennsylvania Bank Bardstown, Ky., from Greensburg, over Highway 4 to junction with Nebraska ing & Trust Co., Philadelphia, Pa. Send Kentucky Highway 61 to junction with Highway 82; then north on Nebraska protests to: Peter R. Guman, District

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6931

Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Operations and Compliance, Interstate Dubuque, Iowa, 52003. Authority sought Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com Commerce Commission, 203 Eastman to operate as a contract carrier, by motor mission, 900 U.S. Customhouse, Phila Building* Boise, Idaho, 83702. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport delphia, Pa., 19106. No. MC 127952 (Sub-No» 1 T A ), filed ing: Building materials and supplies, No. MC 113271 (Sub-No. 25 T A ), filed May 2, 1966. Applicant: BLACKBURN from Dubuque, Iowa, to points in Illi May 3, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL TRUCK LINES, INC., 8735 Juniper nois and Wisconsin within a 50-mile ra TRANSPORT, 1627 Third Street NW., Street, Los Angeles, Calif., 90002. Au dius of Dubuque, Iowa, for 180 days. Great Falls, Mont., 59401. Authority thority sought to operate as a contract Supporting shipper: Wicks Lumber & sought to operate as a common carrier, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Building Supplies, Dubuque, Iowa. Send by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, routes, transporting: Metal cans and protests to: Charles C. Biggers, District transporting': Deflorinated phosphate tops therefor, and fiberboard milk car Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and rock, in bulk, in hopper type vehicles, tons, from points in Los Angeles County, Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com from Garrison, Mont., to the interna Calif., to Phoenix, Ariz., for 180 days. mission, 235 U.S. Post Office Building, tional boundary between the United Supporting shippers: Continental Can Davenport, Iowa, 52801. States and Canada at the points of entry Co., Inc., Russ Building, San Francisco, at or near Trelon and Plentywood, Mont., Calif., 94104; National Can Corp., 290 M otor C arriers o p P assengers on traffic destined to Canada, for 180 Division Street, San Francisco, Calif., No. MC 45626 (Sub-No. 58 T A ), filed days. Supporting shipper: Rocky Moun 94103. Send protests to: John E. Nance, May 3, 1966. Applicant: VERMONT tain Phosphates, Inc., Post Office Box District Supervisor, Bureau of Opera TRAN SIT CO., INC., 135 St. Paul Street, 37, Garrison, Mont., 59731. Send pro tions and Compliance, Interstate Com Burlington, Vt., 05402. Authority sought tests to: Paul J. Labane, District Super merce Commission, Federal Building, to operate as a common carrier, by motor visor, Bureau of Operations and Complir Room 7708,300 North Los Angeles Street, vehicle, over regular routes, transport ance, Interstate Commerce Commission, Los Angeles, Calif., 90012. ing: Passengers and their baggage, and U.S. Post Office Building, Billings, Mont., No. MC 128137 TA, filed May 2, 1966. express and newspapers in the same 59101. Applicant: ROSALIND WEISS, doing vehicle with passengers, in special opera No. MC 123934 (Sub-No. 15 T A ), filed business as R. WEISS, 567 Arlington tions, (1) between junction U.S. High May 2, 1966. Applicant: KREVDA Place, Cedarhurst, N.Y. Applicant’s way 5 and Vermont Highway 25 south BROS. EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box representative: Arthur Levine, 288 Old of Bradford, Vt., and Wentworth, N.H., 68, Gas City, Ind. Applicant’s repre Country Road, Mineola, N.Y. Authority serving all intermediate points and in sentative: Michael J. Krevda (same ad sought to operate as a contract carrier, cluding the right of joinder at Warren, dress as above). Authority sought to by motor vehicle, over regular routes, N.H., and Wentworth, N.H., with car operate as a contract carrier, by motor transporting: Women’s and children’s rier’s existing certificated routes: From vehicle, over irregular routes, transport garments, hanging, and in cartons, from junction U.S. Highway 5 and Vermont ing: Glass containers from Dunkirk, Ind., New York, N.Y., to Morris Plains and Highway 25 south of Bradford, over Ver to points in Chautauqua County, N.Y.; Lodi, N.J., from New York through the mont Highway 25 to the Vermont-New and pallets, platforms and skids and Lincoln Tunnel to junction New Jersey Hampshire State line, thence over New damaged and returned glassware on re Highway 3, thence over New Jersey High Hampshire Highway 25 to Piermont, turn, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: way 3 to junction U.S. Highway 46, thence N.H., thence over New Hampshire High Armstrong Cork Co., Lancaster, Pa., 6ver U.S. Highway 46 to junction U.S. way 25C to Warren, N.H., thence over 17604. Send protests to: Heber Dixon, Highway 202 to Morris Plains, return New Hampshire Highway 25 to Went District Supervisor, Bureau of Opera over U.S. Highway 202 to U.S. Highway worth, N.H., and return over the same tions and Compliance, Interstate Com 46, thence over U.S. Highway 46 to Lodi, route; (2) between Fairlee, Vt., and Pier merce Commission, 308 Federal Build thence over U.S. Highway 46 east to the mont, N.H., serving all intermediate ing, Fort Wayne, Ind., 46802. New Jersey Turnpike, thence over the points: Fr^m Fairlee, Vt., over the Con No. MC 124078 (Sub-No. 216 T A ), filed New Jersey Turnpike to the Lincoln Tun necticut RiVer Bridge to Orford, N.H., May 3, 1966. Applicant: SCHWERMAN nel, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: thence over New Hampshire Highway 10 TRUCKING CO., 611 South 28th Street, Holly Stores, Inc., 550 West 59th Street, to Piermont, N.H., serving all interme Milwaukee, Wis., 53246. Applicant’s New York, N.Y., 10019. Send protests diate points and including the right of representative: James R. Ziperski (same to: E. N. Carignan, District Supervisor, joinder at Orford, N.H. with carrier’s address as above). Authority sought to Bureau of Operations and Compliance, existing certificated routes; for 180 days. operate as a common carrier, by motor Interstate Commerce Commission, 346 Supported by Lake Tarleton Club, Pike, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport Broadway, New York, N.Y., 10013. N.H. (Walter Jacobs, Innkeeper). Send ing: Dry fertilizer, in bulk, from Chat No. MC 128141 TA, filed May 3, 1966. protesst to: Ross J. Seymour, District tanooga, Tenn., to Dalton, Cumming, Applicant: TRI-STATE TRANSPORT, Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Powder Springs, Chatsworth, and A t INC., Post Office Box 4109, Davenport, Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com lanta, Ga., for 150 days. Supporting Iowa, 52808. Applicant’s representative: mission, 14 Parkhurst Street, Lebanon. shipper: Swift & Co., 115 West Jackson Charles L. Burke, Jr. (same address as N.H., 03766. Boulevard, Chicago 4, 111. Send pro above). Authority sought to operate as tests to: W. F. Sibbald, Jr., District a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over By the Commission. Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and irregular routes, transporting: Lime and [ s e a l ] H . N e il G a r s o n , Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com limestone products, from Davenport, Secretary. mission, 108 West Wells Street, Room Iowa, and points within 5 miles thereof, 511, Milwaukee, Vfas., 53203. [F.R. Doc. 66-5116; Filed. May 10, 1966; to points in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, 8:47 a.m .] No. MC 125080 (Sub-No. 1 T A ), Wisconsin, Missouri, and Nebraska, for filed May 3, 1966. Applicant: TETON 150 days. Supporting shipper: Linwood CRANE AND TRANSPORT, INC., 575 Stone Products Co., Inc., Rural Route No. [Notice No. 394] West 20th Street, Idaho Falls, Idaho, 2, Davenport, Iowa, 52804. Send pro 83401. Applicant’s representative: R. tests to: Charles C. Biggers, District MOTOR CARRIER ALTERNATE ROUTE Rex Meikle, 575 West 20th Street, Idaho Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and DEVIATION NOTICES Falls, Idaho, 83401. Authority sought to Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com M a y 6, 1966. operate as a contract carrier, by motor mission, 235 U.S. Post Office Building, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport Davenport, Iowa, 52801. The following letter-notices of pro ing: Prestressed concrete beams, from posals to operate over deviation routes No. MC 128142 TA, filed May 3, for operating convenience only have been Boise, Idaho, to Ontario and Huntington, 1966. Applicant: VINCENT A. CON Oreg., for 120 days. Supporting ship filed with the Interstate Commerce Com RAD, doing business as W. C. TRUCK mission, under the Commission’s devia per: Ready-To-Pour Concrete Co., Post ING CO., 198 Main Street, Dubuque, Office Box 1221, Idaho Falls, Idaho, tion rulès revised, 1957 (49 CFR 211.1(c) Iowa, 52001. Applicant’s representa (8) ) and notice thereof to all interested 83401. Send protests to: C. W. Camp tives: Carl E. Munson Associates, Post bell, District Supervisor, Bureau of persons is hereby given as provided in Office Box 215, 934 University Avenue, such rules (49 CFR 211.1(d)(4)).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6932 NOTICES route as follows: From Fort Wayne, Ind., Highway 4 to junction U.S. Highway 1 Protests against the use of any pro (also from Paterson over New Jersey posed deviation route herein described over Interstate Highway 69 to junction Indiana Highway 9, near Anderson, Ind., Highway 6 to junction U.S. Highway 1), may be filed with the Interstate Com thence over U.S. Highway 1 via New merce Commission in the manner and and return over the same route, for oper ating convenience only. The notice in York, N.Y., to Providence, R.I., and (2) form provided in such rules (49 CFR from New London, Conn., over Connecti 211.1(e)) at any time, but will not oper dicates that the carrier is presently authorized to transport the same com cut Highway 12 to Putnam, Conn., thence ate to stay commencement of the pro over U.S. Highway 44 to Providence, R.I., posed operations unless filed within 30 modities, over pertinent service routes as and return over the same routes. days from the date of publication. follows: (1) From Cincinnati, Ohio, over U.S. Highway 25 to Wapakoneta, Ohio, Successively filed letter-notices of the M otor C arriers o f P assengers same carrier under the Commission’s thence over U.S. Highway 33 to Fort deviation rules revised, 1957, will be Wayne, Ind., and thence over U.S. High No. MC 107109 (Deviation No. 8) numbered consecutively for convenience way 30 to junction U.S. Highway 41, and INDIANAPOLIS & SOUTHEASTERN in identification and protests if any (2) from Indianapolis, Ind., over Indiana TRAILW AYS, INC., 1318 North Capitol should refer to such letter-notices by Highway 67 to junction Indiana Highway Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., filed April 27, number. 9, thence over Indiana Highway 9 to An 1966. Carrier’s representative: James derson, Ind., thence over Indiana High E. Wilson, 1735 K Street NW., Washing M otor C arriers o f P r o pe r t y way 32 to Muncie, Ind., thence over ton, D.C., 20006. Carrier proposes to op No. MC 42487 (Deviation No. 61), Indiana Highway 67 to the Indiana-Ohio erate as a common carrier, by motor vehi CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS State line, and thence over Ohio High cle, of passengers and their baggage, over CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, 175 ' way 29 to St. Marys, Ohio, and return a deviation route as follows: From junc Linfield Drive, Menlo Park, Calif.; filed over the same routes. tion U.S. Highway 25 and Interstate April 27,1966. Carrier proposes to oper No. MC 50544 (Deviation No. 3) , THE Highway 75 (approximately 2 miles south ate as a common carrier, by motor ve TEXAS AND PACIFIC MOTOR TRANS of Williamsburg, K y.), over-Interstate hicle, of general commodities, with cer PORT COMPANY, 210 North 13th Street, Highway 75 to junction Interstate High tain exceptions, over a deviation route St. Louis, Mo., 63103, filed May 2, 1966. way 75 and U.S. Highway 25 (approxi as follows: From Chicago, 111., over Inter Carrier proposes to operate as a common mately 1 mile south of Jellico, Term.), state Highway 55 to junction Interstate carrier, by motor vehicle, of general com and return over the same route, for op Highway 80 near Joliet, 111., thence over modities, with certain exceptions, over a erating convenience only. The notice Interstate Highway 80 to junction Inter deviation route as follows: Between junc indicates that the carrier is presently au state Highway 80S near Big Springs, tion U.S. Highway 80 and Interstate thorized to transport passengers, and the Nebr., thence over Interstate Highway Highway 20, at or near Mesquite, Tex., same property, over a pertinent service 80S to Denver, Colo., and return over and junction Interstate Highway, 20 and route as follows: From junction U.S. the same route, for operating conven Texas Highway 149, at or near Longview, Highway 25 and Interstate Highway 75 ience only. The notice indicates that Tex., over Interstate Highway 20, for (approximately 2 miles south of W il the carrier is presently authorized to operating convenience only. The notice liamsburg, K y .), over U.S. Highway 25 to transport the same commodities over indicates that the carrier is presently junction U.S. Highway 25 and Inter pertinent service routes as follows: (1) authorized to transport the same com state Highway 75 (approximately 1 mile From Kansas City, Kans., over U.S. modities, over a pertinent service route south of Jellico, Tenn.), and return over Highway 69 to junction UJ3. Highway as follows: Between Mesquite, Tex., and the same route. 36, thence over U.S. Highway 36 via Longview, Tex., over U.S. Highway 80. No. MC 109780 (Deviation No. 16), Monroe City, Mo., to Indianapolis, Ind.; No. MC 112107 (Sub-No. 1) (Deviation TRANSCONTINENTAL BUS SYSTEM, (2) from Kansas City, Kans., over U.S. No. 2) (Cancels deviation No. 1), NEW INC., 315 Continental Avenue, Dallas 2, Highway 40 to Kingdom City, Mo., thence ENGLAND MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., 90 Tex., filed April 27, 1966. Carrier pro over U.S. Highway 54 to junction U.S. Grove Street, Paterson, N.J., filed May 2, poses to operate as a common carrier, Highway 36, thence over U.S. Highway 1966. Applicant’s representative: Mor by motor vehicle, of passengers and their 36 via Jacksonville, 111., to .Springfield, ton E. Kiel, 140 Cedar Street, New York, baggage, and express and newspapers, in 111., thence over U.S. Highway 66 via N.Y., 10006. Carrier proposes to operate the same vehicle with passengers, over Bloomington, Chenoa, and Braidwood, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, deviation routes as follows: From Checo- 111., to Chicago, 111.; (3) from Wichita, of general commodities, with certain ex tah, Okla., over Interstate Highway 40 Kans., over U.S. Highway 54 to Liberal, ceptions, over deviation routes as follows: to interchange Interstate Highway 40 Kans.; (4) from Liberal, Kans., over U.S. (1) From Paterson, N.J., over Interstate and U.S. Highway 64, located six (6) Highway 83 to junction U.S. Highway Highway 80 to junction Interstate High miles west of Fort Smith, Ark., with the 24, thence over U.S. Highway 24 to Colby, way 95, at or near Teaneck, N.J., thence following access routes, (1) from Warner, Kans.; (5) from Bucklin, Kans., over over Interstate Highway 95 across the Okla., over access road and Oklahoma unnumbered highway to junction U.S. George Washington Bridge to junction Highway 2, to interchange Interstate Highway 154, thence over U.S. Highway Interstate Highway 91, at New Haven, Highway 40, (2) from Sallisaw, Okla., 154 to Dodge City, Kans., and thence Conn., thence over Interstate Highway over access road and U.S. Highway 59 over U.S. Highway 50 (formerly portion 91 to junction U.S. Highway 6, at Hart to interchange Interstate Highway 40, U.S. Highway 50S) to Garden City, ford, Conn., and thence over U.S. High and (3) from Sallisaw, Okla., over access Kans.; (6) from Denver, Colo., over U.S. way 6 to Providence, R.I., (2) from Pater road and U.S. Highway 64 to interchange Highway 40 via Agate, Colo., to Limon, son, N.J., over the route described in (1)" Interstate Highway 40, and return over Colo., thence over U.S. Highway 24 to above to New Haven, Conn., thence over the same routes, for operating conven junction U.S. Highway 83 (formerly por Interstate Highway 95 to Providence, ience only. The notice indicates that the tion U.S. Highway 24), and thence over R.I., and (3) from Paterson, N.J., over the carrier is authorized to transport pas U.S. Highway 83 via Halford, Kans., to route described in (1) above to the New sengers and the same property over Oakley, Kans.; and (7) from Kansas York-Connecticut State line, at the west pertinent service routes as follows: (1) City, Kans., over the Kansas Turnpike ern terminus of the Connecticut Turn From Oklahoma City, Okla., over U.S. to Wichita, Kans.; and return over the pike, thence over the Connecticut Turn Highway 62 to junction U.S. Highway same routes. pike to the eastern terminus of the Con 266 at or near Henryetta, Okla., thence No. MC 43421 (Deviation No. 12), necticut Turnpike at the Connecticut- over U.S. Highway 266 to junction un DOHRN TRANSFER COMPANY, Post Rhode Island State line, thence over U.S. numbered highway, thence over unnum Office Box 1237, Rock Island, 111., 61202, Highway 6 to Providence, R.I., and return bered highway to Wildcat, Okla., thence filed May 2, 1966. Carrier’s representa over the same routes, for operating con return over unnumbered highway to tive: David Axelrod, 39 South La Salle venience only. The notice indicates that junction U.S. Highway 266, thence over Street, Chicago, 111., 60603. Carrier pro the carrier is presently authorized to U.S. Highway 266 to junction Oklahoma poses to operate as a common carrier, by transport the same commodities over Highway 2, thence over Oklahoma High motor vehicle, of general commodities, pertinent service routes as follows: (1) way 2 to Warner, Okla., and (2) from with certain exceptions, over a deviation From Paterson, N.J., over New Jersey Tulsa, Okla., over U.S. Highway 64, via

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6933

Muskogee, Warner, and Gore, Okla., to Applicant’s representative: William C. finds that the present and future public Fort Smith, Ark., and return over the Dineen, 710 North Plankinton Avenue, convenience and necessity require opera same routes. 412 Empire Building, Milwaukee, Wis., tion by applicant, in interstate or foreign By the Commission. 53203. By application filed January 5, commerce, as a common carrier, by motor 1966, applicant seeks a permit authoriz vehicle, over irregular routes, of dimeth [ s e a l ] H . N e il G a r so n , ing operations, in interstate or foreign yl terephthalate and terephthalic acid, * Secretary. commerce, as a contract carrier by motor other than in bulk, from the plantsite of [F.R. Doc. 66-5117; Filed, May 10, 1966; vehicle, over irregular routes, of liquid Amoco Chemicals Corp., at or near Deca 8:47 a.m.] carbon dioxide, from Milwaukee, Wis., to tur, Ala., to points in Georgia, Illinois, Menominee, Mich., and Sawyer Air Force Indiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Base, at or near Gwinn, Minn. An order Ohio, Kentucky, South Carolina, Ten [Notice 916] of the Commission, Operating Rights nessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, that MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND Board No. 1, dated April 22, 1966, and applicant is fit, willing, and able properly CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS served April 29, 1966, finds that opera to perform such service^ and to conform tion, in interstate or foreign commerce, to the requirements of the Interstate M a y 6, 1966. by applicant as a contract carrier by Commerce Act and the Commission’s The following publications are gov motor vehicle, over irregular routes, of rules and regulations thereunder. Be erned by the new Special Rule 1.247 of liquid carbon dioxide, in bulk, in shipper- cause it is possible that other parties, the Commission’s rules of practice, pub owned tank vehicles, from Milwaukee, who have relied upon the notice of the lished in the F ederal R eg iste r , issue of Wis., to Menominee, Mich., and Sawyer application as published, may have an December 3,1963, which became effective Air Force Base at or near Gwinn, Mich., interest in and would be prejudiced by January 1, 1964. under a continuing contract with Pure the lack of proper notice of the author The publications hereinafter set forth Carbonic Co., a division of Air Reduction ity described in the findings in this order, reflect the scope of the applications as Co., Inc., of New York, N.Y., will be con a notice of the authority actually granted filed by applicant, and may include sistent with the public interest and the will be published in the F ederal R egister descriptions, restrictions, or limitations national transportation policy, that ap and issuance of a certificate in this pro which are not in a form acceptable to plicant is fit, willing, and able properly ceeding will be withheld for a period of 30 the Commission. Authority which ulti to perform such service and to conform days from the date of such publication, mately may be granted as a result of the to the requirements of the Interstate during which period any proper party in applications here noticed will not neces Commerce Act and the Commission’s interest may file an appropriate protest sarily reflect the phraseology set forth rules and regulations thereunder, and or other pleading. in the application as filed, but also will that an appropriate permit should be is No. MC 126745 (Sub-No. 9) (Repub eliminate any restrictions which are not sued, subject to the condition that it lication) , filed August 26,1965, published acceptable to the Commission. shall be limited in point of time to a F ederal R eg ister issue of September 9, period expiring 5 years from the effective 1965, and republished, this issue. Appli A pplications A ssig n e d fo r O ral H ear ing date thereof. Because it is possible that cant: SOUTHERN COURIERS, INC., MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY other parties, who have relied upon the 222-17 Northern Boulevard, Bayside, N.Y. notice of the application as published, Applicant’s representative: Ewell H. No. MC 112696 (Sub-No. 34), filed may have an interest in and would be Muse, Jr., Suite 4 1 5 , Perry-Brooks Build May 4, 1966. Applicant: HARTMANS, prejudiced by the lack of proper notice ing, Austin, Tex., 78701. By applica INCORPORATED, Post Office Box 898, of the authority described in the findings tion filed August 26, 1965, as amended, Harrisonburg, Va. Applicant’s repre in this order, a notice of the authority applicant seeks a certificate of public sentative: James E. Wilson, 1735 K actually granted will be published in the. convenience and necessity authorizing Street N.W., Washington, D.C., 20006. F ederal R eg ister and issuance of a per operation, in interstate or foreign com Authority sought to operate as a com mit in this proceeding will be withheld merce, as a common carrier by motor ve mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir for a period of 30 days from the date of hicle, over irregular routes, of the com regular routes, transporting: Meats, such publication, during which period modities and between the points in meat products, and meat byproducts, any proper party in interest may file dicated in the findings below, except that frozen foods, food products, and chew an appropriate protest or other pleading. applicant requests that the proposed ing gum, from points in Massachusetts, No. MC 116254 (Sub-No. 62) (Repub service be limited to shippers other than Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, lication), filed November 4, 1965, pub banks and banking institutions. An or New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, to lished F ederal R e g ister issue of Novem der of the Commission, Operating Rights points in Virginia, Alabama, Tennessee, ber 18, 1965, and republished, this issue. Board No. 1, dated April 22, 1966, and Mississippi, and Louisiana. Applicant: D & L TRANSPORT, INC., served April 29,1966, finds that the pres HEARING: May 24, 1966, at the 3800 South Laramie Avenue, Cicero, 111., ent and future public convenience and Offices of the Interstate Commerce Com 60650. Applicant’s representative: necessity require operation by applicant, mission, Washington, D.C., before Ex David Axelrod, 39 South La Salle Street, in interstate or foreign commerce, as a aminer Edith H. Cockrill. Chicago 3, 111. By application filed No common carrier by motor vehicle, over No. MC 115840 (Sub-No. 24), filed vember 4, 1965, as amended, applicant irregular routes, of business papers, rec April 25, 1966. Applicant: COLONIAL seeks a certificate of public convenience ords, and audit accounting media, be FAST FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1215 and necessity authorizing operation, in tween Birmingham, Ala., on the one Bankhead Highway West, Post Office interstate or foreign commerce, as a com hand, and, on the other, points in Box 2169, Birmingham, Ala. Authority mon carrier by motor vehicle, over ir Georgia, that notice of this finding sought to operate as a common carrier, regular routes, of dimethyl terephthal- should be published in the F ederal R eg by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, ate and terephthalic acid, in bins of 4,000 is t e r . Because it is possible that other transporting: Iron and steel, and iron pounds to 5,500 pounds capacity each, parties, who have relied upon the notice and steel articles, from Gadsden and from the plant site of Amoco Chemicals of the application as published, may have Birmingham, Ala., to points in Texas. Corp. located at or near Decatur, Ala., an interest in and would be prejudiced HEARING: May 24, 1966, at the Hotel to points in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, by the lack of proper notice of the au Thomas Jefferson, Second Avenue and Indiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, thority described in the findings in this 17th Street North, Birmingham, Ala., Ohio, Kentucky, South Carolina, Ten order, a notice of authority actually before Examiner Walter D. Matson. nessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, granted will be published in the F ederal No. MC 6031 (Sub-No. 38) (Republica restricted to traffic which is loaded in R eg ist e r , and any proper party in inter tion), filed January 5, 1966, published bins or containers prior to placement on est may file an appropriate pleading F ederal R eg ister issue of January 27, vehicles, which is destined to Kingsport, within a period of 30 days from the date 1966, and republished, this issue. Ap Tenn., and points in Virginia and West of such publication. plicant: BARRY TRANSFER & STOR Virginia. An order of the Commission, No. MC 127442 (Republication), filed AGE COMPANY, a corporation, 120 East Operating Rights Board No. 1, dated July 16,1965, published F ederal R egister National Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis., 53204. April 21, 1966, and served April 28, 1966, issues of August 11, 1965, and December

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6934 NOTICES

29, 1965, respectively, and republished, ing operations, in interstate or foreign New Jersey on and north of New Jersey this issue. Applicant: JOHN PIZER, commerce, as a common carrier by motor Highway 33, and those in Nassau, Suffolk, doing business as JOHN PIZER TAXI, vehicle, over irregular routes, of cinder Westchester, Dutchess, Putnam, Orange, Rockland, Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, 224 ^2 South Broad Street, Grove City, blocks, gravel, and crushed stone, (1) Pa. Applicant’s representative: David from points in Watauga County, N.C., to N.Y. Any interested person desiring to W. Ketler, Grove City National Bank points in Johnson County, Tenn., and (2) participate may file an original and six Building, Grove City, Pa. By applica from Dante, Va., to Boone, N.C. An copies of his written representations, tion filed July 16, 1965, as amended, ap order of the Commission, Operating views, or argument in support of, or plicant seeks a permit authorizing op Rights Board No. 1, dated April 22, 1966, against the petition, within 30 days from erations, in interstate or for'eign com and served April 29, 1966, finds that op the date of publication in the F ederal merce, as a contract carrier by motor ve eration by applicant, in interstate or R egister. foreign commerce, as a contract carrier hicle, over irregular routes, of parcels not A pplications for C ertificates or P er by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, exceeding 1,000 pounds in weight, such m it s W h ic h A re T o B e P rocessed of gravel and sand, from Dante, Va., to as may be transported by station wagon, Concurrently W it h A pplications Boone, N.C., under a continuing contract including machinery parts, tools, and U nder S ection 5 G overned b y S pecial with Maymead Block Co., of Boone, N.C., light manufactured items, (1) between R u le 1.240 To T he Extent A pplicable the Borough of Grove City and the will be consistent with the public inter Franklin Airport, Venango County, Pa., est and the national transportation pol No. MC 55896 (Sub-No. 25), filed April the Cleveland Hopkins Airport, Cuya icy, that applicant is fit, willing, and able 25, 1966. Applicant: R. W. EXPRESS, hoga County, Ohio, and the Youngstown properly to perform such service and to INC., 4840 Wyoming, Dearborn, Mich., Airport, Trumbull County, Ohio, for ship conform to the requirements of the Inter 48126. Applicant’s representative: Rob ment by airfreight, and (2) between the state Commerce Act and the Commis ert A. Sullivan, 1800 Buhl Building, De Cooper-Bessemer Corp. plant, Grove sion’s rules and regulations thereunder. troit, Mich., 48226. Authority sought to City, Pa., and Youngstown, Cleveland, Because it is possible that other parties, operate as a common carrier, by motor and Akron, Ohio; under contract with who have relied upon the notice of the vehicle, over irregular routes, transport the Cooper-Bessemer Corp., Grove City, application as published, may have an ing: General commodities (except those Pa. An order of the Commission, Op interest in and would be prejudiced by of unusual value, and except dangerous erating Rights Board No. 1, dated April the lack of proper notice of the author explosives, household goods as defined by 22, 1966, and served April 29, 1966, finds ity described in the findings herein, a the Commission, commodities in bulk, that operation by applicant, in inter notice of the authority actually granted commodities requiring special equip state or foreign commerce, as a contract will be published in the F ederal R egister ment, and those injurious or contami carrier by motor vehicle, over irregular and issuance of a permit herein will be nating to other lading), between Toledo, routes, of (1) tools, and parts and equip withheld for a period of 30 days from the Ohio, and points in Ohio. N o t e : Appli ment for engines and machinery, from date of such publication, during which cation is directly related to MC-F-9369, the plantsite of^the Cooper-Bessemer period any proper party in interest may published March 16, 1966. I f a hearing Co., located at Grove City, Pa., to Akron, file an appropriate protest or other is deemed necessary, applicant requests Cleveland, and Youngstown, Ohio, the pleading. - it be held at Washington, D.C. No. MC 66512 (Sub-No. 4), filed April Franklin Airport, located in Venango N otice of F ilin g of P etition County, Pa., and the Youngstown Air 26, 1966. Applicant: P & G MOTOR port, located in Trumbull County, Ohio, No. MC 6805 (Sub-No. 2) (Notice of FREIGHT, INCORPORATED, 450 and (2) parts, materials, and supplies filing of petition to amend authority Burnham Street, South Windsor, Conn. used in the manufacture of engines and granted), filed April 21,1966. Petitioner: Applicant’s representatives: Clyde E. machinery, from the destination points SIEBERT TRUCKING CO., a corpora Herring, The Shoreham Building, 15th to the origin points described in (1) tion, 416 45th Street, Union City, N.J. and H Streets NW., Washington, D.C., above (subject to the limitation that Petitioner’s representative: Morton E. 20005, Louis Barsky, Suite 327, 40 Court shipments moving from or to airports will Kiel, 140 Cedar Street, New York 6, N.Y. Street, Boston, Mass., and Frank J. be restricted to those having a prior or By application filed March 26, 1965, ap Weiner, 182 Forbes Building, Forbes subsequent movement by air), under a plicant sought a certificate as a common Road, Braintree, Mass., 02184. Author continuing contract with the Cooper- carrier by motor vehicle, over irregular ity sought to operate as a common car Bessemer Co., Grove City, Pa., will be routes, to transport cement, from the rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular consistent with the public interest and storage facilities of Hercules Cement Co., routes, transporting: General commod the national transportation policy, that division of American Cement Corp., ities (except those of unusual value and the applicant is fit, willing, and able Edgewater, N.J., to points in Connecticut, except dangerous explosives, household properly to perform such service and to those in New Jersey on and north of New goods as defined in Practices of Motor conform to the requirements of the in Jersey Highway 33 and those in Nassau, Common Carriers of Household Goods, terstate Commerce Act and the Com Suffolk, Westchester, Dutchess, Putnam, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in bulk, and mission’s rules and regulations there Orange, Rockland, Sullivan, and Ulster commodities requiring special equip under. Because it is possible that other Counties, N.Y., and returned shipments ment) , between points in Massachusetts. parties, who have relied upon the notice on return. By order dated February 10, N o te : This application is directly related of the application as published, may 1966, Division 1 affirmed the findings of to MC-F-9410, published F ederal R eg have an interest in and would be prej Operating Rights Review Board No. 1, ister issue of May 4,1966. udiced by the lack of proper notice of and the grant of authority became ad No. MC 109533 (Sub-No. 31), filed the authority described in the findings ministratively final. Petitioner states April 15, 1966. Applicant: OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a cor in this order, a notice of the authority that it was recently advised that because actually granted will be published in the of circumstances beyond the control of poration, 1100 Commerce Road, Rich mond, Va., 23209. Authority sought to F ederal R egister and issuance of a per shipper, the facilities for the handling of mit in this proceeding will be withheld cement, which were required to be in operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transport for a period of 30 days from the date of stalled on the silos at the premises in such publication, during which period Edgewater would not be installed. ing: General commodities, (1) between any proper party in interest may file an Therefore, arrangements were made for junction U.S. Highway 1 (301) and appropriate protest or other pleading. the construction of silos for use of the Virginia Highway 145 and junction Vir No. MC 127674 (Republication), filed shipper at Weehawken, N.J. By the ginia Highway 616 and U.S. Highway 1 (301); from junction U.S. Highway 1 October 22, 1965, published F ederal instant petition, petitioner requests that (301) and Virginia Highway 145, over R egister issue of December 9, 1965, and the certificate to be issued authorize Virginia Highway 145 to junction Vir republished, this issue. Applicant: transportation as follows: Cement, over ginia Highway 10, thence over Virginia OWEN MICKEY LITTLE, doing busi irregular routes, from the storage facility Highway 10 to junction Virginia High ness as OWEN M. LITTLE, Zionville, of Hercules Cement Co., division of way 616, thence over Virginia High N.C. By application filed October 22, American Cement Corp., Weehawken, way 616 to junction U.S. Highway 1 1965, applicant seeks a permit authoriz N.J., to points in Connecticut, those in

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6935

(301), (2) between junction U.S. High Highway 144 and U.S. Highway 1 (301); plaster accelerator, plasterboard joint way 1 (301) and Virginia Highway 638 from junction Virginia Highway 144 and system, tape, and wallboard, and mineral and Chesterfield Courthouse; from junc Virginia Highway 10, near Chester, over wool, in mixed loads with the commodi tion U.S. Highway 1 (301) and Virginia Virginia Highway 144 to junction U.S. ties specified herein, from the plantsite of Highway 638, over Virginia Highway 638 Highway 1 (301), (14) between junction the Ruberoid Co., Wheatland (Monroe to junction Virginia Highway 10, thence Virginia Highways 616 and 10 and junc County), N.Y., to New York, N.Y., points over Virginia Highway 10 to Chesterfield tion^ Virginia Highways 1132 and 620; in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, N.Y., Courthouse, (3) between junction Vir from junction Virginia Highway 616 and and Connecticut, Massachusetts, and ginia Highways 655 and 10, at Chester Virginia Highway 10, over Virginia High Rhode Island, with no transportation for field Courthouse, and Pocahontas State ways 616 and 619 to junction Virginia compensation on return except as other Park; from junction Virginia Highway Highways 620 and 1132, (15) between wise authorized. 655 and Virginia Highway 10, over Vir junction Virginia Highways 620 and 619 (4) Gypsum products, plaster re ginia Highway 655 to Pocahontas State and junction Virginia Highways 619 and tarder, plaster accelerator, plasterboard Park, (4) between junction Virginia 617; from junction Virginia Highway 619 joint system, tape, and wallboard, from Highways 655 and 636 near Chesterfield and Virginia Highway 620, over Vir the plantsite of The Ruberoid Co., Courthouse and junction Virginia High ginia Highway 619 to junction Virginia Wheatland (Monroe County), N.Y., to ways 669 and 602; from junction Virginia Highway 617, (16) between junction points in New Jersey and in that part Highway 655 and Virginia Highway 636, Virginia Highways 616 and 615 and junc of Pennsylvania on and east of U.S. over Virginia Highway 636 to junction tion Virginia Highways 732 and 618; Highway 15, with no transportation for Virginia Highway 602, thence over Vir from junction Virginia Highway 616 and compensation on return except as other ginia Highway 602 to junction Vir Virginia Highway 615, over Virginia wise authorized. N o te : Applicant states ginia Highway 669, (5) between junction Highways 616 and 732 to junction Vir that authority sought herein is a con Virginia Highways 636 and 626 and junc ginia Highway 618, and return over the version of Permit No. MC 117774 and tion Virginia Highways 600 and 626; from same routes, serving all intermediate Sub-Nos. 1, 2, and 4 to certificates of junction Virginia Highway 636 and Vir points in connection with (1) through public convenience and necessity. Said ginia Highway 626, over Virginia High (16) above, and (17) from Meadowville, permits all contained shipper keystones way 626 to junction Virginia Highway Va., southwardly, returning to the same restricting operations to those performed 600. point in a circuitous manner, over Vir under contract or contracts with The (6) Between junction Virginia High ginia Highways 619, 617, 620, and 618, as Ruberoid Co. To preserve parity there ways 628 and 602 and junction Virginia they variously connect, serving all inter with in this conversion applicant has Highways 628 and 36, near Ettrick; from mediate points. Restriction: This au proposed a plantsite restriction. Au junction Virginia Highway 628 and thority shall not authorize service at any thority sought is to be tacked with au Virginia Highway 602, over Virginia point on Virginia Highway 10 east of thority being concurrently sought in Highway 628 to junction Virginia U.S. Highway 1 (301) nor at Bermuda another BMC 78 application to convert Highway 36 at or near Ettrick, (7) Hundred, provided that the granting of certificate of registration No. MC 45762 between junction Virginia Highways this authority is without restriction to (Sub-No. 2), in which applicant is au 669 and 626 and junction Virginia High service by Richmond-Petersburg Freight thorized to operate in the State of New ways 602 and 669; from, junction Virginia Line or by Wilson Trucking Corp., or the York, to a certificate of public conven Highway 669 and Virginia Highway 626, successors of either of them, at points ience and necessity. Application is over Virginia Highway 669 to junction now served by either corporation. N ote : directly related to MC-F-9408, to be Virginia Highway 602, (8) between junc The application is directly related to published May 4, 1966. tion Virginia Highways 669 and 601 and Docket No. MC-F 9403, published April I f a hearing is deemed necessary, ap junction Virginia Highways 601 and 36; 27, 1966. If a hearing is deemed neces plicant requests it be held at Syracuse, from junction Virginia Highway 669 and sary, applicant requests it be held at N.Y. Virginia Highway 601, over Virginia Richmond, Va. No. MC 128132 (Sub-No. 1), filed April Highway 601 to junction Virginia High No. MC 128132, filed April 25, 1966. way 36, (9) between junction Virginia 25,1966. Applicant: GEORGE A. TAY Applicant: GEORGE A. TAYLOR, INC., LOR, INC., 4 Philmore Avenue, Post Highways 600 and 36 and Petersburg, 4 Philmore Avenue, Post Office Box 188, Va.; from junction Virginia Highway 600 Office Box 188, Caledonia, N.Y. Appli Caledonia, N.Y. Applicant’s representa cant’s representative: Herbert M. Can and Virginia Highway 36, over Virginia tive: Herbert M. Canter, 345 South Highway 600 to junction U.S. Highways ter, 345 South Warren Street, Syracuse, Warren Street, Syracuse, N.Y., 13202. N.Y., 13202. Authority sought to op 460 and 1, thence over U.S. Highways 460 Authority sought to operate as a common and 1 to Petersburg, (10) between junc erate as a common carrier, by motor carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular vehicle, over regular routes, trans tion Virginia Highways 36 and 600 and routes, transporting: (1) Gypsum prod Virginia Highways 626 and 625; from porting : General commodities (except ucts, plaster retarder, plaster accelerator, household goods as defined by the Com junction Virginia Highway 36 and Vir plasterboard joint system, tape, and ginia Highway 600, over Virginia High mission, commodities which require spe wallboard, except liquid commodities in cial equipment, commodities in bulk, way 600 to junction Virginia Highway bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plantsite 626, thence over Virginia Highway 626 to commodities of unusual value, and of the Ruberoid Co., Wheatland (Mon classes A and B explosives), (1) between junction Virginia Highway 625, (11) be roe County), N.Y., to points in Ohio, tween junction Virginia Highways 625 Albion and Buffalo, N.Y., as follows: those in Pennsylvania west of U.S. High From Albion, N.Y., over New York High and 10 and junction Branders Bridge way 15, and those in Macomb, Monroe, Road and U.S. Highway 1 (301) in way 279, to Waterport, thence over un Wayne, and Oakland Counties, Mich.; numbered county road to Lyndonville, Colonial Heights; from junction Virginia and empty containers or other such in Highway 625 and Virginia Highway 10, N.Y., thence over New York Highway cidental facilities used in transporting 63 to Medina, N.Y., thence over New over Virginia Highway 625 to Branders the above-specified commodities, on re Bridge Road, thence over Branders York Highway 31 to Lockport, N.Y., turn, (2) mineral wool, in mixed ship thence over New York Highway 78 to Bridge Road to junction U.S. Highway 1 ments with gypsum products, plaster re (301) at or near Colonial Heights, (12) junction New York Highway 263, thence tarder, plaster accelerator, plasterboard over New York Highway 263 to Buffalo; between junction Virginia Highways 145 joint system, tape and wallboard, from and 144, near Centralia, and junction and return over the following route: the plantsite of the Ruberoid Co., Wheat- From Buffalo over New York Highway Virginia Highways 10 and 144, near Ches land (Monroe County), N.Y., to points 263 to junction New York Highway 78, ter, Va.; from junction Virginia Highway in Ohio, that part of Pennsylvania on thence over New York Highway 78 to 144 and Virginia Highway 145, near and west of U.S. Highway 15, and points Lockport, N.Y., thence over New York Centralia, over Virginia Highway 144 to in Macomb, Monroe, Wayne, and Oak Highway 78 to Olcott, N.Y., thence over junction Virginia Highway 10, near land Counties, Mich., with no transpor Chester. New York Highway 18 to Sommerset, tation for compensation on return except N.Y., thence over unnumbered county (13) Between junction Virginia High as otherwise authorized, (3) gypsum, road to junction U.S. Highway 104, ways 144 and 10 and junction Virginia gypsum products, plaster retarder, thence over U.S. Highway 104 to Hart-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 No. 91------7 6936 NOTICES land, N.Y., thence over unnumbered FRESNO - ALBUQUERQUE T R U C K bulk, as a common carrier, over a regu county road to Gasport, N.Y., thence LINE, INC., doing business as CARDI lar route, between Syracuse, N.Y., and over New York Highway 31 to Medina, NAL EXPRESS LINES, 1661 Chapin Skaneateles, N.Y., serving the inter NY., thence over New York Highway Road, Montebello, Calif., and for acqui mediate points of Elbridge, Skaneateles 63 to Lyndonville, N.Y., thence over un sition by JAMES F. DIGBY, also of Den Junction, Glenside, Skaneateles Falls, numbered county road to Waterport, ver, Colo., of control of such rights and and Mottville, N.Y.; and under a certifi N.Y., thence over New York Highway property through the transaction. Ap cate of registration in Docket No. MC- 279 to junction New York Highway 98, plicants’ attorney: Truman A. Stockton, 28711 Sub-No. 2, covering the transpor thence over New York Highway 98 to Jr., the 1650 Grant Street Building, Den-r tation of property, as a common carrier, Albion; serving all intermediate points ver, Colo., 80203. Operating rights in intrastate commerce, within the State and the off-route points of Ashwood, sought to be controlled and merged: of New York. Vendee is authorized to Eagle Harbor, Kendall, Millers, and Alcohol, alcoholic beverages, and wine operate under a certificate of registra West Kendall (Orleans County), N.Y.; making materials, and supplies, as a com tion, as a common carrier, in the State (2) between Buffalo and Rochester, N.Y., mon carrier, over regular and irregu of New York. Application has been filed over New York Highway 33, including lar routes, from Fresno, Calif., and points for temporary authority under section service from Buffalo, Batavia, and within 25 miles of Fresno to Albuquerque, , 210a(b). Rochester, N.Y., to all intermediate N. Mex., and to and from the intermedi No. MC-F-9415. Authority sought for points, and the off-route points of East ate points of Bakersfield, Calif., and Gal purchase by FR ANK C. KLEIN & CO., Pembroke, Elba, South Byron, Byron, lup, N. Mex.; alcoholic beverages, glass INC., 3600 East 46th Avenue* Denver, Clarendon, and Bergen, N.Y. containers, caps, cartons, and cooperage, Colo., 80216, of a portion of the operat (3) Between Batavia and Rochester,from Albuquerque, N. Mex., to Fresno, ing rights of JIM CHELF, INC., 5226 N.Y., over New York Highway 33 and Calif., including points within 25 miles of Brighton Boulevard, Denver, Colo., 33A; and (4) between Batavia and Fresno, and to and from the intermedi- t 80216, and for acquisition by FRANK C. Rochester, N.Y.: From Batavia over ate points of Bakersfield, Calif., and Gal KLEIN and DAVID E. KLEIN, both of New York Highway 5 to East Avon, N.Y., lup, N. Mex.; malt beverages, over ir 3600 East 46th Avenue, Denver, Colo., of thence over U.S. Highway 15 to Roches regular routes, from Golden, Colo., to control of such rights through the pur ter, and return over the same route, certain specified points in California. chase. Applicants’ attorneys: Stock- serving the intermediate points of Staf Restriction: The service authorized here ton, Lewis & Mitchell, 1650 Grant Street, ford, Le Roy, Caledonia, and Avon, in is subject to the followings conditions: Denver, Colo., 80203. Operating right N.Y., and the off-route point of Mum- Carrier’s operations shall be conducted' sought to be transferred: Petroleum ford, N.Y. N o t e : Applicant is author separately from carrier’s other business products, in bulk, as a common carrier, ized to conduct operations as a contract activities. Carrier shall maintain sepa over irregular routes, from Sinclair carrier in permit No. 117774 and subs rate accounting systems for its private (formerly Parco), Wyo., to Big Spring thereunder; therefore, dual operations and for-hire operations. Carrier shall and Ogallala, Nebr., and certain specified may be involved. Applicant states that not at the same time and in the same ve points in Colorado, from Sinclair (for the authority sought is basically a con hicle transport property both as a pri merly Parco), Wyo., to construction proj version of certificate of registration No. vate and as a for-hire carrier; frozen ects in Colorado not located within the MC 45762 (Sub-No. 2), which is based fruits, frozen vegetables, and frozen fish, limits of incorporated cities or towns; upon a New York Public Service Com in packages, when moving in the same and refined petroleum products, from mission certificate of public convenience vehicle with frozen fruits and frozen veg refining and distributing points in Kan and necessity, and each route is to be etables, from points in California, Ore sas, to certain specified points in Colo authorized to be tacked with each other gon, and Washington, to Denver, Colo., rado. Vendee is authorized to operate route as is authorized by the New York from points in California, to Pueblo, as a common carrier in Wyoming, Colo Public Service Commission in Part 831, Colo.; and frozen vegetables, an

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 NOTICES 6937

A pplications A ssigned for O ral H earing NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTOR CAR sity sought to operate a freight service RIER INTRASTATE APPLICATIONS as follows: Transporting Safes and ma MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY chinery, restricted to articles weighing The applications immediately follow M a y 6,1966. under 2,000 pounds and requiring special ing are assigned for hearing at the time The following applications for motor equipment; store, restaurant, hotel, and and place designated in the notice of common carrier authority to operate in institutional fixtures and equipment filing as here published in each proceed intrastate commerce seek concurrent (other than new furniture) ; and com ing. All of the proceedings are subject motor carrier authorization in interstate mercial refrigeration equipment, from to the special rules of procedure for or foreign commerce within the limits of the City of Buffalo, N.Y., to points in hearing outlined below: the intrastate authority sought, pursu Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, ant to section 206(a) (6) of the Interstate Genesee, Niagara, Orleans, and Wyoming S pecial R ules of P rocedure for H earing Commerce Act, as amended October 15, Counties, N.Y., and returned, rejected, (1) All of the testimony to be adduced 1962. These applications are governed and traded-in merchandise of the same by applicant’s company witnesses shall by Special Rule 1.245 of the Commis description, in the reverse direction. be in the form of written statements sion’s rules of practice, published in the HEARING: Date and time of hearing which shall be submitted at the hearing F ederal R egister, issue of April 11, 1963, to be hereafter fixed. Requests for pro at the time and place indicated. page 3533, which provides, among other cedural information, including the time (2) All of the written statements by things, that protests and requests for for filing protests, concerning this appli applicant’s company witnesses shall be information concerning the time and cation should be addressed to the Public offered in evidence at the hearing in the place of State commission hearings or Service Commission, 55 Elk Street, Al same manner as any other type of evi other proceedings, any subsequent bany, N.Y., 12225, and should not be dence. The witnesses submitting the changes therein, and any other related directed to the Interstate Commerce written statements shall be made avail matters shall be directed to the State Commission. able at the hearing for cross- commission with which the application By the Commission. examination, if such becomes necessary. is filed and shall not be addressed to or (3) The written statements by appli filed with the Interstate Commerce [ seal] H. N e il G arson, cant’s company witnesses, if received in Commission. 1 Secretary. evidence, will be accepted as exhibits. State Docket No. M-3995, filed April [F.R. Doc. 66-5120; Filed, May 10, 1966; To the extent the written statements 20, 1966. Applicant: BATESVILLE 8:47 a.m.] refer to attached documents such as TRUCK LINE, INC., Lower Boswell Street, Batesville, Ark. Applicant’s rep copies of operating authority, etc., they [3d Rev. S.O. 562; Pfahler’s ICC Order 200, should be referred to in written state resentative: M. F. Highsmith, Fourth Amdt. 2 ] ment as numbered appendices thereto. and College Streets, Batesville, Ark. (4) The admissibility of the evidence Certificate of public convenience and ALL RAILROADS contained in the written statements and necessity sought to operate a freight the appendices thereto, will be at the service as follows : Transporting general Rerouting of Traffic time of offer, subject to the same rules commodities, (1) between junction of Upon further consideration of Pfahler’s as if the evidence were produced in the Arkansas Highways 58 and 69, over ICC Order No. 200 and good cause usual manner. Arkansas Highway 58, to Guion, Ark., appearing therefor: (5) Supplemental testimony by a wit (2) between Mount Pleasant, Ark., and It is ordered, That: ness to correct errors or to supply inad Guion, Ark., over unmarked county road, Pfahler’s ICC Order No. 200 be, and vertent omissions in his written state (3) between Guion, Ark., and junction it is hereby amended by substituting the ment is permissible. Arkansas Highway 14, over unmarked following paragraph (g) for paragraph No. MC 114569 (Sub-No. 78), filed county road, (4) between junction of (g) thereof: April 27, 1966. Applicant: SHAFFER Arkansas Highways 5 and 9 over Arkan (g) Expiration date. This order shall TRUCKING, INC., Post Office Box 418, sas Highway 5 to junction of Arkansas expire at 11:59 p.m., July 31, 1966, unless New Kingstown, Pa. Applicant’s repre Highway 5 and U.S. Highway 62, and (5) otherwise modified, changed or sus sentative: James Hagar, Commerce between junction of Arkansas Highways pended. 14 and 9 over Arkansas Highway 14 to I t is further ordered, That this amend Building, Box 432, Harrisburg, Pa. Au junction of Arkansas Highways 14 and ment shall become effective at 11:59 p.m., thority sought to operate as a common 27, serving all intermediate points on the May 9, 1966, and that this order shall be carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular above-described routes. N o te: Fore served upon the Association of American routes, transporting: Foodstuffs (except going sought authority to be tacked with Railroads, Car Service Division, as agent in bulk, in tank vehicles), and advertis present authority of applicant contained of all railroads subscribing to the car ing materials, supplies, and premiums, in Arkansas certificate No. M-448 and service and per diem agreement under Interstate Certificate of Registration the terms of that agreement, and by fil when moving in the. same vehicle, from MC-97127 Sub 3. Also, by the instant ing it with the Director, Office of the the facilities of American Home Prod application authority is sought to serve Federal Register. ucts Corp., at La Porte, Ind., to points in in both intrastate and interstate com merce. Issued at Washington, D.C., May 5, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachu 1966. setts, Delaware, Virginia, Maryland, HEARING: June 7, 1966, at 10 a.m., at the offices of the Arkansas Commerce I nterstate C ommerce West Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennes Commission, Justice Building, Little C o m m is s io n , [ seal] R. D. P fahler, see, North Carolina, New Jersey, New Rock, Ark. Requests for procedural in Agent. York, and Pennsylvania, and the District formation, including the'time for filing of Columbia. protests, concerning this application [F.R. Doc. 66-5113; Filed, May 10, 1966; HEARING: June 6, 1966, at the In should be addressed to the Arkansas 8:46 a.m.[ diana Public Service Commission, New Commerce Commission, Justice Building, Little Rock, Ark., 72201, and should not State Office Building, 100 North Senate [Investigation and Suspension Docket No. be directed to the Interstate Commerce M—20476] Avenue, Indianapolis, Ind., before Ex Commission. aminer Theodore M. Tahan. State Docket No. MT-6862, filed April CLASS RATES AND PER-SHIPMENT By the Commission. 11,1966. Applicant : FRANK L. BROWN, CHARGES, MIDDLEWEST, CENTRAL doing business as BROWN THE MOVER, AND SOUTHWEST STATES [ seal] H. N e il G arson, 58 Herman Street, Buffalo, N.Y. Appli Secretary. cant’s representative: William J. Hirsch, It appearing, that by order dated April [F.R. Doc. 66-5119; Filed, May 10, 1966; 43 Niagara Street, Buffalo, N.Y. Cer 27, 1966, the Commission, Board of Sus 8:47 a.m.] tificate of public convenience and neces pension, instituted an investigation in

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 6938 NOTICES the above-entitled proceeding into and attached list above mentioned, desiring FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS concerning the lawfulness of the rates, to become parties of record and to receive FOR RELIEF charges and regulations contained in the and/or serve copies of the evidence to proposed tariff schedules and suspended be filed in accordance with the special M a y 6, 1966. their operation to and including Novem procedure in the instant proceeding, Protests to the granting of an applica ber 30, 1966; shall notify the Commission, in writing, tion must be prepared in accordance with It further appearing, that upon con on or before May 27, 1966. Rule 1.40 of the general rules of prac sideration of the record in the above- I t is further ordered, That: tice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within 15 entitled proceeding, this matter is one (1) On or before June 20, 1966, re days from the date of publication of this which should be referred to a hearing spondents and interveners in support notice in the F ederal R egister. examiner for hearing; thereof shall serve on the parties of It further appearing, that this matter record their direct evidence in the form L ong- and-S hort H aul is related to the proceeding in Docket of verified statements. FSA No. 40463—Beet or cane sugar No. 34667—Per-Shipment Charges and (2) On or before July 11, 1966, the from ■ Hereford, Tex. Filed by South Minimum Charges, Middlewest, Central protestants and interveners in support western Freight Bureau, agent (No. B- and Southwest States, and both proceed thereof shall serve on all parties of record 8853), for interested rail carriers. Rates ings should be heard on a common their evidence in the form of verified on beet or cane sugar, dry, in bulk, in record; statements. covered hopper cars, in carloads, from It further appearing, that on January (3) On or before July 6, 1966, the Hereford, Tex., to Chicago, HI., and 4,1966, the Commission entered an order protestants are required to give notice points grouped therewith, also Joliet, which, among other things, referred No. of their intention to cross-examine 111. 34667 to a hearing examiner for hearing specific witnesses. Grounds for relief—Market competi and directed the special procedure to be (4) On or before July 19, 1966, the tion. followed by all parties; respondents are required to give notice Tariff—Supplement 53 to Southwest And it further appearing, that by order of their intention to cross-examine ern Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ICC dated April 25, 1966, the special proce-' specific witnesses. 4514. dure, as set forth in the Commission’s (5) Evidence which fails to conform FSA No. 40464— Chlorine to Catawba, order of January 4, 1966, was modified to the above-outlined procedure may be S.C. Filed by O. W. South, Jr., agent in certain respects, and that such special cause for its rejection from the record (No. A4890), for interested rail carriers. procedure should be followed in this in this proceeding. Rates on chlorine, in tank carloads, from proceeding; I t is further ordered, That the provi Calvert, Ky., to Catawba, S.C. And good cause appearing therefor: sions respecting submission of carrier- Grounds for relief—Market competi I t is ordered, That the above-entitled affiliate financial and operating relation tion. proceeding be, and it is hereby, referred ships and transactions in the Commis Tariff—Supplement 89 to Southern to Hearing Examiner Robert C. Bam- sion’s order of January 4, 1966, as ford for hearing on a common record amended by order dated March 29, 1966, Freight Association, agent, tariff ICC with No. 34667—Per-Shipment Charges be, and they are hereby, incorporated S-484. and Minimum Charges Middlewest, Cen by reference and made a requirement FSA No. 40465— Class and commodity tral, and Southwest States, commencing in this proceeding as if fully set forth rates from and to East Danville, Va. on July 19, 1966, at 9:30 o’clock a.m. herein. Filed by O. W. South, Jr., agent (No. U.S. standard time, or (9:30 o’clock ajn. And it is further ordered, That a copy A4889), for interested rail carriers. local daylight saving time, if that time of this order be delivered to the Director, is observed), at the Hotel President, 14th Office of the Federal Register, for publi Rates on property moving on class and and Baltimore Streets, Kansas City, Mo., cation in the F ederal R egister as notice commodity rates, between East Danville, and for the recommendation of an ap to all interested persons. Va., on the one hand, and points ip the propriate order thereon, accompanied Dated at Washington, D.C., this 2d United States and Canada, on the other. by the reasons therefor. day of May, A.D. 1966. Grounds for relief—New station and I t is further ordered, That all persons grouping. named in the list of parties attached to By the Commission, Commissioner the Commission’s order in No. 34667 Brown. By the Commission. dated April 25, 1966, shall be considered [ seal] H. N e il G arson, [ seal] H. N e il G arson, parties to the instant proceeding. Secretary. Secretary. I t is further ordered, That any person, [F.R. Doc. 66-5115; Filed, May 10, 1966; [F.R. Doe. 66-5114; Filed, May 10, 1966; in addition to the parties named in the 8:47 a.m.] 8:46 a jn .}

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966 FEDERAL REGISTER 6939

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— MAY

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during May.

Page Page 3 CFR 14 CFR— Continued Page 32A CFR P roclamation : 73______.*______6893 BDSA (Ch. V I) : 3718 ______6567 97______6612, 6685, 6828, 6894 BDSA Reg. 2__ 6590 3719 ------6607 137______6685 33 CFR 3720 ______6679 151______- ____ 6686 203______6907 3721 ______68Î7 208______6620 207 ______6590, 6622, 6867 3722______1------6855 223______6584 208 ______6707 E x e c u t iv e O rder : 320______— ______6585 11277 ______6609 378______„______6621 35 CFR 11278 ______6681 P roposed R u l e s : 255______6831 11017 (Superseded by EO 71_ 6716, 6717, 6837, 6838, 6873, 6908 121______1______6592 38 CFR 11278)______1------6681 2______6770 11069 (Superseded by EO 15 CFR 21______6771 11278)______6681 30______6587 11218 (Superseded by EO 39 CFR 373 ______6707 P r o po sed R u l e s : 11278)______6681 374 ______6707 P residential D o c u m e n t s O th e r 21__'i______, ______6715 377______6707 T h a n P roclamations and E x e c 24______6715 379 ______6709 u t iv e O r d e r s: 382______6707, 6709 41 CFR Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 384 ______6709, 6864 6-1______6622 1966______- 6857 385 ______6709 6-2______6623 5 CFR 399______— _ 6707, 6709, 6829, 6866 6-3______6623 213 ______6769, 6859, 6903 16 CFR 6-5_____ 6624 772______6569 6-7______6624 15______6866, 6906 6 -1 1 ______6624 7 CFR 17 CFR 6-30______6624 7 ______—______6569 200______6588 6-60______6625 50______— ______6570 240______6705, 6706 9 -1 2 ______6907 68______6629 22-60______6625 718______— ______6859 19 CFR 101-45^______— 6831 722______6573, 6580, 6859 1______6611 724______6819 10______6769 43 CFR 729_.______6581 P roposed R u l e s : P u b l ic L and O r d er s: 813______6819 1______6871 3977 (amended by PLO 4000)_____ 6868 815______6860 20______6908 3999 ______— 6907 908 ______.„I _____ 6825 20 CFR 4000 ______4______6868 ______6825 P roposed R u l e s : 909 ______404-______6611 910 ______6826 3130______6834 959______6860 21 CFR 3160______6836 980______6629 121______6830 45 CFR 1098 ______6581 131______¿_____ 6705, 6906 1099 ______6861 146c______... ___ 6830 177______6591 801-^______— 6591 1421______6904 191______6622 1427______6861 P roposed R u l e s : 46 CFR 1434.,______— ______6582 51______6792 309______6891 1490______— ______6862 24 CFR P roposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : 510______6792 ______6871 200______6866 52______512 ______6838 58______6715 26 CFR 513 ______6838 916______6871 l ______6589 965______6592 31______6589 47 CFR 1032______6631 0 ______6627, 6831 1050______6631 28 CFR 1 ______6831,6868 1065______6873 o______6867 73______6627,6628,6868 1126______6631 29 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 8 CFR 548______6769 2______6909 214 ______6611 800______6770 73______6637, 6638, 6792, 6838, 6874 87______6909 12 CFR 31 CFR 1______6826,6905 2Ò2______6590 49 CFR 522______6905 316______6831 71-79______6591 524______;______6905 332______6686,6831 95______6832 14 CFR 32 CFR 50 CFR 39______6582, 6685, 6790 300______6831 33______6629, 6832, 6869, 6893 71_____ 6582,6584,6791, 6826, 6827, 6864 1472______6906 60______6833

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 91— WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1966

U.S. GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION MANUAL

The United States P resen ts authoritative information about Government agencies. Government Organization Manual D escrib es the creation and authority, organization, and func- iions of the agencies in the legislative, judicial, and executive is the official guide branches. to the functions of the This handbook is an indispensable reference tool for teachers, Federal Government librarians, scholars, lawyers, and businessmen who need cur rent official information about the U.S. Government*

per copy* Paperbound, with charts Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402*