Airport Master Plan Demand Forecast Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airport Master Plan Demand Forecast Update AIRPORT MASTER PLAN DEMAND FORECAST UPDATE MINETA-SAN JOSE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN DEMAND FORECAST UPDATE HNTB Corporation June 2, 2017 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN DEMAND FORECAST UPDATE Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Economic Trends .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Definition of Air Trade Area .......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Demographic and Economic Growth ............................................................................................ 2 3 Historical Airport Activity ................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Passenger Originations ................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Passenger Enplanements .............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Aircraft Operations ....................................................................................................................... 8 4 Forecast Assumptions ...................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Unconstrained Forecasts ............................................................................................................ 10 4.2 Economic Growth ........................................................................................................................ 10 4.3 Air Fares and Yield ....................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Taxes and Fees ............................................................................................................................ 10 4.5 Load Factor .................................................................................................................................. 11 4.6 Fleet Mix ..................................................................................................................................... 11 4.7 Gating Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 12 4.8 Constraints at SFO and OAK ........................................................................................................ 12 4.9 Regulatory Assumptions ............................................................................................................. 13 4.10 Future Security Environment .................................................................................................. 13 4.11 International Political Environment ........................................................................................ 13 4.12 Environmental Factors ............................................................................................................ 13 5 Passenger Forecasts ....................................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Domestic Passenger Originations Forecast without Diversion from SFO and OAK .................... 15 5.2 International Passenger Originations Forecast ........................................................................... 16 5.3 Passenger Enplanements without Diversion from SFO and OAK ............................................... 17 5.4 Forecast of Diversion from Other Bay Area Airports .................................................................. 19 6 Forecasts of Passenger Aircraft Departures .................................................................................. 22 7 Forecasts of Air Cargo Activity ....................................................................................................... 23 7.1 Domestic Air Cargo ..................................................................................................................... 23 7.2 International Air Cargo ................................................................................................................ 24 7.3 Air Cargo Operations ................................................................................................................... 24 7.4 Air Cargo Summary ..................................................................................................................... 24 8 Forecasts of GA and Military Activity............................................................................................. 25 Technical Report 1 pg. i 6-2-2017 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN DEMAND FORECAST UPDATE 8.1 General Aviation ......................................................................................................................... 25 8.2 Military ........................................................................................................................................ 27 9 Landed Weight Forecast ................................................................................................................ 28 10 Peak Activity Forecast .................................................................................................................... 28 11 Summary of Forecasts ................................................................................................................... 29 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SOCIOECONOMIC DATA AND PROJECTIONS ........................................................................A-1 APPENDIX B: AIR FARES AND YIELD ........................................................................................................... B-1 APPENDIX C: HISTORICAL AVIATION ACTIVITY .......................................................................................... C-1 APPENDIX D: SJC PASSENGER FORECAST WITHOUT DIVERSION FROM SFO AND OAK ........................... D-1 APPENDIX E: SJC PASSENGER FORECAST WITH DIVERSION FROM SFO AND OAK .................................... E-1 APPENDIX F: SJC PASSENGER AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FORECAST ............................................................ F-1 APPENDIX G: SJC AIR CARGO FORECAST................................................................................................... G-1 APPENDIX H: SJC GENERAL AVIATION FORECAST ..................................................................................... H-1 APPENDIX I: SJC MILITARY FORECAST ......................................................................................................... I-1 APPENDIX J: LANDED WEIGHT FORECAST .................................................................................................. J-1 APPENDIX K: PEAK ACTIVITY FORECASTS ................................................................................................... K-1 APPENDIX L: FLEET MIX SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... L-1 APPENDIX M: COMPARISON WITH TAF ................................................................................................... M-1 List of Figures Page Figure 1 Historical and Projected Population: SJC Air Trade Area .......................................................... 4 Figure 2 Historical and Projected Employment: SJC Air Trade Area ....................................................... 4 Figure 3 Historical and Projected Per Capita Income: SJC Air Trade Area .............................................. 5 Figure 4 Historical and Projected Total Personal Income: SJC Air Trade Area ....................................... 6 Figure 5 Historical Domestic Passenger Originations at SJC, SFO, and OAK ........................................... 7 Figure 2 Historical and Projected 7-County Income ............................................................................. 10 Figure 6 SJC Historical and Projected Fares and Fees ........................................................................... 11 Figure 7 SJC Passenger Forecast Approach ........................................................................................... 14 Figure 8 SJC Scheduled Revenue Enplanement Forecast with Diversions from SFO and OAK ............. 20 Figure 9 SJC General Aviation Based Aircraft Forecast ......................................................................... 26 Figure 10 SJC General Aviation Aircraft Operations Forecast ................................................................. 27 Figure 11 Summary of Aircraft Landed Weight Forecasts ...................................................................... 28 Figure 12 Summary of Aircraft Operations Forecasts ............................................................................. 30 Technical Report 1 pg. ii 6-2-2017 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN DEMAND FORECAST UPDATE List of Tables Page Table 1 San Jose Air Trade Area: Economic Projections ........................................................................ 6 Table 2 Historical Passenger Enplanements at SJC ................................................................................ 8 Table 3 Historical Aircraft Operations at SJC ......................................................................................... 9 Table 4 Enplanement Forecast (without diversion from SFO and OAK) ............................................. 18 Table
Recommended publications
  • Summary Appraisal Report
    Appraisal Report of the Benchmark Fair Market Rental Values for the State of Hawaii County of Kauai Airports As of July 1, 2016 County of Kauai Airports APPRAISAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSMITTAL LETTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 I. CERTIFICATION 3 II. LIMITING CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS 5 III. ASSIGNMENT AND SUMMARY 8 Purpose of Appraisal 8 Function of Report 8 Interest Appraised 9 Intended Use and User of the Report 9 Scope of Work 9 Definitions 10 Airport Rental Categories 11 Rental Conclusions 12 IV. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (State and County of Kauai) 16 V. BENCHMARK PROPERTY TYPES FOR ALL HAWAII STATE AIRPORTS 19 A. Spaces and Areas in Buildings 19 B. Industrial Lands 20 C. Parking Stalls 20 D. Aircraft Storage (Tie Downs) 21 VI. ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALL HAWAII STATE AIRPORTS 22 A. Utilities 22 B. Special Conditions - Buildings 22 C. Special Conditions - Lands 22 VII. VALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR ALL HAWAII STATE AIRPORTS 24 A. Building Spaces and Areas within the Airport or Adjacent to the Airport 26 1. Retail Rental Market Considerations 27 2. Office Rental Market Considerations 27 3. Industrial Rental Market Considerations 28 4. Calculation of Benchmark Rental Values for Retail, Office, and Industrial Spaces at Small Airports 28 5. Calculation of Rental Values for T-Hangars 29 Hastings, Conboy & Associates, Ltd. Page 1 County of Kauai Airports APPRAISAL REPORT B. Undeveloped Lands 29 1. General 29 (a) Valuation of Improved Unpaved Industrial Land 30 (b) Calculation of Paving Cost Recovery 31 (c) Valuation of Unimproved Industrial Land 32 2. Estimating Fee Simple Land Value 32 3.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Hawai'i
    - William P. Kenai BJ Leithead Todd DirectOr Mayor Margaret K. Masunaga Deputy West I-lawai'; Office East Hawai'i Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Kailua-Kona, Hawai'j 96740 County ofHawai'i Hila. Hawai'i 96720 Phone (808) 323-4770 Phone (808) % 1-8288 Fax (808) 327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax (808) 961-8742 MEMORANDUM No.20J..Z.e6 TO: Staff FROM: BJ Leithead Todd t'1-.7 planning Director DATE: September 10.2012 SUBJECf: Airport Hazards At a recent Hawai'i Department of Transportation (HOOn meeting on August 7, 2012, the Airport Division gave a presentation on airport hazards regarding what to look for and how to respond. There are a number ofland use decisions and developments that can greatly affect the safety of the airport zones and flight patterns. Some of these include reflective surfaces Qike building facades and solar panels), zip lines, communications towers, wind turbines, other structure nearing 200 feet or higher, and wildlife habitats. As directed by the Airport Division, we should be looking for any ofthe above mentioned hazards that are proposed within 5 miles of an airport. Our GIS staffwill be adding a layer into the GIS system noting this 5 mile radius. lf we receive an application with a questionable hazard, we should report it to the HOOT Airport Division and require the applicant to provide a letter of no effect or approval with conditions from that division. Reflective surfaces and tower like structures are relatively easy to identi1Y, but wildlife habitats may DOt be as obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Metrics on the World's Major Airlines
    essential metrics on the world’s major airlines Top 20 carriers based on 12 months’ seat capacity to September 2017 essential metrics decoded About OAG take-off • Data from Schedules Analyser is • OTP data is sourced from OAG’s Rank Airline Seats (Oct16-Sep17) for the 12 months to September Flight Status database and is for 2017. the 12 months to September 2017. 1 American Airlines 251,483,734 Where average coverage falls 2 Delta Air Lines 225,796,738 below OAG’s 80% threshold, a • Data from Traffic Analyser is for the 3 Southwest Airlines 201,582,829 12 months to June 2017. carrier’s entry has been recorded as N/A. 4 United Airlines 182,179,745 5 Ryanair 133,675,731 • Estimated Bookings Load Factor is calculated by dividing bookings by • Fleet data is sourced from CAPA 6 China Southern Airlines 119,141,114 (www.centreforaviation.com ) as seats and represents an estimated 7 China Eastern Airlines 113,779,195 bookings load factor which doesn’t of October 2017. Narrow-body 8 easyJet 87,066,832 take into account non-revenue fleet and aircraft on order figures passengers. Both data sets are for include regional jets. Freighters 9 Turkish Airlines 85,079,215 are excluded. the 12 months to June 2017. 10 Air China 83,249,431 11 Lufthansa German Airlines 83,175,267 • Number of Routes served is for the • Network section: Fastest growing 12 months to September 2017. country is of the Top 10 country 12 LATAM Group 81,715,360 markets served by that carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Monroe Energy, Llc for Delta Air Lines, Inc. Amid a Bearish
    A Work Project presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FLYING HIGH IN A COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY an Equity Research Report on Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL: NYSE) FRANCISCO SEQUEIRA DE PAIVA MARTINS DA SILVA STUDENT NUMBER 33897 PEDRO MANUEL CORREIA PEREIRA STUDENT NUMBER 33968 A Project carried out on the Master’s in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Rosário André January 3rd, 2020 Abstract This equity research report will first be focusing on the North American Arline industry, analyzing its current form, as well as looking at industry’s opportunities and threats ahead. On top of this, an outlook over the airline industry will also be presented in order to give the investors an accurate view of the present and the future. A further analysis will then be conducted with regards do Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL:NYSE), applying the previous research to provide a fair valuation for the group, resulting in an sustained recommendation of whether an investor should consider invest in DAL, or not. Keywords Delta Air Lines, Inc.; Airline; Equity Research; Valuation This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209). MASTERS IN FINANCE EQUITY RESEARCH DELTA AIR LINES, INC. COMPANY REPORT AIR TRANSPORTATION - AIRLINES JANUARY 3RD, 2020 STUDENTS: FRANCISO SILVA / PEDRO PEREIRA [email protected] / [email protected] Flying High In A Competitive Industry During the first 9-months of 2019, solid demand for air travel supported a 6.4% Recommendation: STRONG BUY growth of passenger revenue for Delta Air Lines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Hawaii Department of Transportation, Airports Division
    Federal Aviation Administration Office of Airports Compliance and Management Analysis Revenue Use Compliance Review State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Airports Division For the Six Year Period of July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2013 1 State of Hawaii Department of Transportation – Airports Division Revenue Use Review of Selected Airports The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (ACO) conducted a Revenue Use Compliance Review of the State of Hawaii’s Department of Transportation – Airports Division (DOTA) to evaluate compliance with the FAA Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue (Revenue Use Policy) for the period July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2013. The FAA and its contractor conducted this review at the DOTA offices in Honolulu, Hawaii and outlying islands. The State of Hawaii owns, operates, and sponsors the airport system, which consists of fifteen airports operating under the jurisdiction of DOTA. DOTA is composed of five administrative staff offices (Staff Services, Visitor Information Program, Information Technology, Engineering, and Airports Operations) providing services to all of the state airports within four District Offices. The four districts and airports within the assigned district are: • Oahu District o Honolulu International Airport (HNL) o Kalaeloa Airport (JRF) o Dillingham Airfield (HDH) • Maui District o Hana Airport (HNM) o Kalaupapa Airport (LUP) o Kahului Airport (OGG) o Kapalua Airport (JHM) o Lanai Airport (LNY) o Molokai Airport (MKK) • Hawaii District o Kona International Airport (KOA) o Hilo International Airport (ITO) o Upolu Airport (UPP) o Waimea-Kohala Airport (MUE) • Kauai District o Lihue Airport (LIH) o Port Allen Airport (PAK) ACO selected a sample of five airports for ACO’s review of airport compliance with the Revenue Use Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lanai Community Plan";
    COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF MAUI PLANNING COMMITTEE February 5, 2016 Committee Report No. Honorable Chair and Members of the County Council County of Maui Wailuku, Maui, Hawaii Chair and Members: Your Planning Committee, having met on January 15, 2015, January 28, 2015 (site inspection and meeting), January 29, 2015, February 5, 2015, February 12, 2015, March 5, 2015, May 28, 2015, June 23, 2015, December 16, 2015, and January 7, 2016, makes reference to County Communication 14-283, from the Planning Director, transmitting the following: 1. Proposed bill entitled "A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2.80B, MAUI COUNTY CODE, RELATING TO THE LANAI COMMUNITY PLAN"; 2. "LANAI COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE: LANAI PLANNING COMMISSION: FINAL DRAFT: OCTOBER 31, 2014"; and 3. "LANAI COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE: COMMUNITY PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE: FINAL DRAFT: SEPTEMBER 30, 2013." The purpose of the proposed bill is to adopt a revised Lanai Community Plan, including decennial revisions required by Chapter 2.80B, Maui County Code ("MCC"). Your Committee notes Section 8-8.5 of the Revised Charter of the County of Maui (1983), as amended ("Charter"), provides community plans are part of the General Plan and shall identify the County's "objectives to be achieved, and priorities, policies, and implementing actions to be pursued . and other matters related to development." The Charter requires community plans to "set forth, in detail, land uses within the community plan region" and include "implementing actions COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF MAUI PLANNING COMMITTEE Committee Page 2 Report No. that clearly identify priorities, timelines, estimated costs, and the county department accountable for the completion of the implementing actions." Your Committee further notes Chapter 2.80B, MCC, identifies the scope and rationale for the community plans and, consistent with the Charter, requires implementing actions.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Hawaii Department of Transportation AIRPORTS DIVISION
    Programmatic Environmental Hazard Evaluation and Environmental Hazard Management Plan State of Hawaii Department of Transportation AIRPORTS DIVISION Prepared for: State of Hawaii Department of Transportation, Airports Division Engineering Environmental (AIR-EE) 300 Rodgers Boulevard, Suite 700 Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 Prepared by: Environmental Science International, Inc. 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 Kailua, Hawaii 96734 ESI Project No. 117019:DO-18 October 21, 2019 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1-1 SECTION 2 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................ 2-1 SECTION 3 AREA COVERED ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Property Location, Setting, and History ............................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL) ..................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Kawaihapai Airfield (HDH) ................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Kalaeloa Airport (JRF) ...................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.4 Kahului Airport (OGG) ...................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.5 Kapalua Airport (JHM) .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Air Lines Inc
    Krause Fund Research Spring 2021 Industrials and Materials Delta Air Lines, Inc. (NYSE: DAL) Recommendation: SELL April 20, 2021 Analysts Current Price: $44.45 Eddie Khachikian Target Price: $36.05-$40.05 [email protected] Michael Samataro [email protected] We recommend to SELL Delta Air Lines because of its Kezheng Yi inefficient operations, uncertain consumer confidence, [email protected] and unpredictable industry outlook. Our target price is a range of $36.05-$40.05. This is a 14.56% decrease from their current price. Delta Air Lines was founded in 1924. It is one of the oldest American airlines. Since the change in jet fuel prices is a leading factor for financial problems in the airline sector, • Consumer confidence is trending downwards since Delta makes strategies towards improving the situation the beginning of the global pandemic regarding these types of expense. Delta also aims to attract the • Delta Air Lines has highly inefficient fuel costs and corporate traveler, which is a market characterized by low overall operating liabilities price sensitivity leading to higher margins. For the leadership • Low dividend payout keeps Delta from being a target skills of their employees, Delta leads to the highest level of by the inflow of value investors attention and respect towards customers. 52-Week High $52.28 • Consumer confidence has the ability to drastically 52-Week Low $17.51 increase with the increasing vaccination rates Beta Value (5Y Monthly) 1.51 • Low debt costs could allow for an opportunity to Average
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 17, 2017 Audio recordings are made of this meeting NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 1: Review and Approval of March 15, 2017 MAY 17, 2017 Meeting Minutes NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results MAY 17, 2017 Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results NEXTGEN AT MSP A NON-TRADITIONAL PATH • In 2005 request to FAA for MSP to be a test site for Continuous Descent Arrivals – request was denied • In July 2007 – NOC began investigating evolving navigation technology to reduce noise, identified RNAV as an opportunity • OPDs viewed as a critical element • July 2009 – Crossing-in-Corridor and Runway 17 River RNAV Departures submitted to the FAA Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results CONSENSUS BY ALL STAKEHOLDERS ON A FUTURE NOC RESOLUTION 01-2014 SOLUTION • Hearing community concerns early on • NOC Supports RNAV arrivals with OPDs • Establishing and communicating a • A case study of successful RNAV departure implementation at another airport with similar framework for future RNAV departure challenges, particularly, dense population surrounding procedure design the airport – Resource allocation • Future RNAV departure designs and implementation incorporates framework for outreach – Early public outreach – Holistic public outreach – Place local FAA personnel in leadership position to communicate with the airport and community AIRPORT LEADING THE CHARGE TO QUANTIFY OPD BENEFITS Identify OPD Flights Apply Fuel Savings Aggregate Fuel Savings Calculate Carbon Emission Reduction Item
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda for the Meeting of the Board of Land and Natural Resources
    SUZANNE D. CASE CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y. IGE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES GOVERNOR OF HAWAI’I COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ROBERT K. MASUDA FIRST DEPUTY M. KALEO MANUEL DEPUTY DIRECTOR - WATER AQUATIC RESOURCES BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION STATE OF HAWAI’I BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT POST OFFICE BOX 621 ENGINEERING FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE HONOLULU, HAWAI’I 96809 HISTORIC PRESERVATION KAHOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION LAND STATE PARKS AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DATE: JULY 23, 2021, 9:00 A.M. LOCATION: Online via ZOOM, Livestream via YouTube Meeting materials are available for public review in advance of the meeting at: https://dlnr.Hawaii.gov/meetings/blnr-meetings-2021/ Considering the evolving COVID-19 situation, protecting the health and welfare of the community is of utmost concern. As such, the meeting will be held remotely, with board members, staff and applicants participating via an online meeting venue. The meeting will be livestreamed at: http://youtube.com/c/boardoflandandnaturalresourcesdlnr TESTIMONY: Interested persons can submit written testimony in advance of each meeting that will be distributed to Board Members prior to the meeting. Written testimony must be submitted no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting to ensure time for Board Members to review it. Late written testimony will be retained as part of the record, but we cannot assure Board Members will receive it with sufficient time for review prior to decision-making. Submit written testimony [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • State of Hawaii Airports System Revenue Bonds (The Certificate), As Well As Pfcs and Cfcs That Can Only Be Used for Specific Projects
    STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AIRPORTS DIVISION Airports System Revenue Bonds (CUSIP 419794) Series of 2010A & Refunding Series of 2010B Refunding Series of 2011 Series of 2015A and 2015B Series of 2018A, 2018B, 2018C and 2018D CONTINUING DISCLOSURE UNDERTAKING ANNUAL INFORMATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 In accordance with the continuing disclosure obligations as issuers of municipal securities under the Securities and Exchange Commission rule 15c2-12, as amended, attached please find the required annual information as follows: • The Airport System o General o Primary Airports o Impacts of COVID-19 o Passenger Traffic and Airlines ➢ Table 1 – Enplaned Passengers and Aircraft Operations ➢ Table 2 – Summary of Landed Weights o Airline Service and Passenger Activity Operations ➢ Table 3 – Landed Weights by Airlines ➢ Table 4 – Enplaned Passengers by Airlines • Sources of Revenues and Aviation Fuel Taxes o General o Net Revenues and Taxes and Debt Service Requirements ➢ Table 5 – Calculations of Net Revenues and Taxes and Debt Service Requirements o Concession Fees o Aeronautical Revenues o Non-Aeronautical Revenues Other Than Concession Fees o Cash and Cash Equivalents ➢ Table 6 – Summary of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments • Audited Financial Statement THE AIRPORTS SYSTEM General The Department operates and maintains 15 airports at various locations within the State. The Airports Division has jurisdiction over and control of the Airports System. Virtually all non- military passenger traffic throughout Hawaii passes through the Airports System, which includes five primary airports and ten secondary airports. The primary airports are Daniel K. Inouye International (on the Island of Oahu), Kahului (on the Island of Maui), Hilo International and Ellison Onizuka Kona International at Keahole (both on the Island of Hawaii), and Lihue (on the Island of Kauai).
    [Show full text]