NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 17, 2017
Audio recordings are made of this meeting NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 1: Review and Approval of March 15, 2017 MAY 17, 2017 Meeting Minutes NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results MAY 17, 2017 Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results NEXTGEN AT MSP A NON-TRADITIONAL PATH • In 2005 request to FAA for MSP to be a test site for Continuous Descent Arrivals – request was denied • In July 2007 – NOC began investigating evolving navigation technology to reduce noise, identified RNAV as an opportunity • OPDs viewed as a critical element • July 2009 – Crossing-in-Corridor and Runway 17 River RNAV Departures submitted to the FAA Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results
CONSENSUS BY ALL STAKEHOLDERS ON A FUTURE NOC RESOLUTION 01-2014 SOLUTION • Hearing community concerns early on • NOC Supports RNAV arrivals with OPDs • Establishing and communicating a • A case study of successful RNAV departure implementation at another airport with similar framework for future RNAV departure challenges, particularly, dense population surrounding procedure design the airport – Resource allocation • Future RNAV departure designs and implementation incorporates framework for outreach – Early public outreach – Holistic public outreach – Place local FAA personnel in leadership position to communicate with the airport and community AIRPORT LEADING THE CHARGE TO QUANTIFY OPD BENEFITS
Identify OPD Flights
Apply Fuel Savings
Aggregate Fuel Savings
Calculate Carbon Emission Reduction Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results
PARTNERS
Model Consultation and Verification Flight Track Data Operational Fuel Validation Airports Planning NextGen Data MSP Tower, and Environmental Systems Airlines TRACON and Division Analysis and Center Modeling Office Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results
PROCESS Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results FLIGHT DATA – MACNOMS
DATA
FLIGHT DATA – MSP TRACON (M98) FLIGHT DATA – MSP ARTCC (ZMP) Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results
DATA
• Data from Minneapolis Center used in the OPD Application – Data point every 15 seconds – Range captures full descent – Source data rounds altitudes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results APPLICATION OUTPUTS
FLIGHT ATTRIBUTES DESCENT STATISTICS • MSP Arrival Date/Time • Top of Descent 4-D Location • Aircraft Type • Descent Distance to 8,000 • Arrival Runway • Descent Distance to ground • Origin Airport • Percent of Descent in Level • Airspace Arrival Gate Flight
CRUISE STATISTICS FUEL STATISTICS • Ring Intersection Location • Fuel Burn Rate • Distance and Time Flown to • Fuel Burn Reduction Value Ground Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results 8,000feet Evaluateaircraft descentsbetween “top ofdescent”and
OPD DETERMINING OPD TRAJECTORY - approachsegmentof the descent RNAV • • Thiswas determination levelflight is descentLess than10%of controllers collaborationwith FAA individualandobservations withof developedvalidation arrivalproceduresendbefore the final
NON-OPD • • • 12,000 feet 12,000 neverreached that Flights Non levelflight descentis of or more 10% - Jet Aircraft Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results FLG 4002 Aircraft Type: CRJ-200 Arrival Time: 2014-03-04 17:13 Origin Airport: XNA – Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Arrival Runway: 12L Arrival Airspace Gate: NITZR Top of Descent Altitude: 28,800 feet Descent Distance: 163 nm Percent Level: 31% Ring Stats: 50 nm time = 27.2 minutes 100 nm time = 36.4 minutes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results DAL2485 Aircraft Type: B737-900 Arrival Time: 2014-07-15 22:45 Origin Airport: SEA – Seattle International Airport Arrival Runway: 30R Arrival Airspace Gate: Top of Descent Altitude: 36,791 feet Descent Distance: 135 nm Percent Level: 14% Ring Stats: 50 nm time = 16.6 minutes 100 nm time = 23.4 minutes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results FLG3678 Aircraft Type: CRJ-900 Arrival Time: 2016-11-26 08:01 Origin Airport: MSO – Missoula Montana Airport Arrival Runway: 30R Arrival Airspace Gate: BAINY Top of Descent Altitude: 32,892 feet Descent Distance: 153 nm Percent Level: 8.9% Ring Stats: 50 nm Time = 17.7 minutes 100 nm Time = 25.6 minutes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results DAL1088 Aircraft Type: B757-200 Arrival Time: 2016-12-07 4:13 Origin Airport: ANC – Anchorage International Arrival Runway: 12R Arrival Airspace Gate: BAINY Top of Descent Altitude: 38,789 feet Descent Distance: 116 nm Percent Level: 0.0% Ring Stats: 50 NM Time = 11.0 minutes 100 NM Time = 18.7 minutes RESULTS Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD USAGE 79.4%
OF ALL CAPABLE MSP ARRIVALS HAVE AN OPD DESCENT PROFILE Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results MSP CONTINUOUS DESCENT ARRIVALS JET AIRCRAFT OVERALL PERCENTAGE MONTHLY PERCENTAGE 100% 90% 80% OPD USAGE 70% 60% 50% 79.4% 40% IMPLEMENTATION 79.4% 30% 20% 39.0% 10%
OF ALL CAPABLE MSP ARRIVALS HAVE AN OPD 0% (OPD) RNAV
14 15 16
14 15 16 17
14 15 16
14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17
- - -
- - - -
- - -
------
DESCENT PROFILE -
JUL JUL JUL
SEP SEP SEP
JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR
Overall Percentage Daily Usage 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% IMPLEMENTATION 20% 10%
0% (OPD) RNAV
1-Mar 8-Mar
15-Mar 22-Mar 29-Mar Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED FUEL BURN BY 15.1
GALLONS OF FUEL PER FLIGHT Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED FUEL BURN BY 2,892,385
GALLONS OF FUEL ANNUALLY Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED FUEL BURN BY 5,816,467
GALLONS OF FUEL SINCE IMPLEMENTATION Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS BY 28,465
METRIC TONS ANNUALLY Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS BY 57,243
METRIC TONS SINCE IMPLEMENTATION Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results
REMOVING REDUCING MILES REDUCING CO2 RECYCLING INSTEAD RECYCLING INSTEAD OF 12,092 DRIVEN ON EMISSIONS FROM OF LANDFILLING LANDFILLING CARS FROM ROADS BY 6,441,206 18,166 2,595 THE ROAD 137,191,757 GALLONS OF TONS OF WASTE GARBAGE TRUCKS OF WASTE AUTOMOBILE GAS
ELIMINATING THE CHANGING PLANTING PLANTING HAVING A SOLAR FIELD AT ENERGY USED AT 2,029,174 1,483,518 54,186 MSP THAT IS 6,045 INCANDESCENT LIGHT TREES AND LETTING ACRES OF 2.5 HOMES BULBS TO LED THEM GROW FOR 10 FOREST TIMES ITS CURRENT SIZE YEARS NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 3: Guest Speaker: MSP Update by Executive MAY 17, 2017 Director/CEO, Brian Ryks MSP Update
Brian Ryks, Executive Director and CEO Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Airports Commission
• Public corporation created by Minnesota Legislature • Owns and operates seven airports within the Twin Cities metro area • User-fee based funding • Limited property taxing authority unused since 1960s Legislated Purpose
• Promote efficient, safe, and economical air commerce • Develop the full potentialities of the metropolitan area as an aviation center • Minimize the environmental impact from air transportation and the public’s exposure to noise and safety hazards around airports Our Board Commission Chair District A Disctrict B District C Daniel Boivin Carl Crimmins Rick King Katie Clark Sieben
• Governor appoints chairman and 12 District D District E District F District G Steve Cramer James Deal Michael Madigan Richard Ginsberg commissioners (eight metro, four greater Minnesota) who serve four-year, staggered terms • Minneapolis and St. Paul mayors each appoint District H City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul Outstate St. Cloud one Ibrahim Mohamed Erica Prosser Pat Harris Patti Gartland
Outstate Duluth Outstate Thief River Falls Outstate Rochester Metropolitan Airports Donald Monaco Dixie Hoard Randy Schubring Commission Our Mission Connecting you to your world Our Vision Providing your best airport experience Minneapolis – St. Paul International Airport • 16th busiest airport in North America (passengers) • 15th busiest in operations • Delta Air Lines’ 2nd largest hub Operational Funding Concessions 11% Parking and Ground Transportation • Conservative forecasting: nowhere to turn 37% except reserves or short-term financing • Financial model predicated only on originating Airline Rates and and destination passengers Charges • Maintain six-month reserve 33% • AA- bond rating
Utilities Rents and and Other Fees 5% 14% MAC Airport System Operations
1,000,000
900,000
800,000 MSP experienced 413,279 700,000 landings and takeoffs in 2016, the 600,000 first increase (2.1%) since 2013, but still well below the 2004 500,000 record of 541,093 operations. 400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Reliever Operations 530,726 449,619 423,931 389,843 377,093 386,383 363,190 332,383 306,532 348,701 322,291 MSP Operations 477,212 452,972 450,044 432,395 437,075 436,506 425,332 431,418 412,586 404,612 413,279 Passenger Numbers Near Record Levels
37,604,373 37,505,521 40,000,000
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Traveler Demographics: 21 or Trips more 11 to 20 6% 10%
1 to 2 Number of Trips Annually from MSP 39% • Nearly two-thirds of travelers fly five or fewer 6 to 10 times each year. 16% • Only 16% fly 11 or more times.
3 to 5 29% Traveler Demographics: Business or Leisure? Other 16% Business 32% Reason for Travel • More than half the people traveling at MSP are doing so for leisure. • Nearly one-third are business travelers.
Leisure 52% Traveler Demographics: 76-Older Age 3% 16-21 65-75 6% 22-25 13% 7%
26-34 11%
55-64 27% 35-44 14%
45-54 19% Traveler Demographics: Gender
Male 40%
Female 60% Air Service Success Measures
• Major, stable Delta hub • Base for Sun Country Airlines • Additions since 2008: • Alaska Air, 2008 • Southwest Airlines, 2009 • Spirit, 2012 • Air France, 2013 • Condor, 2014 • Boutique, 2016 • Air Choice One, 2016 • KLM, 2017 • Competitive incentives program Air Service Added in 2016-17
Ten airlines added a total of 24 additional routes from MSP in 2016 and 2017. MSP now enjoys competitive air service on a record 53 of its total 155 direct routes. Operating Sustainably Most extensive noise mitigation program in U.S.
Optimized profile Phase 1 carbon descent use and accreditation measurement application Operating Sustainably First green roof at Terminal 2
3 megawatt solar 1.3 megawatt solar energy facility at facility at Terminal Terminal 1 2 Reimagine MSP Recent Improvements
• Expanded Terminal 1 international arrivals area • Terminal 2: new auto rental facilities • Quick Ride Ramp at Terminal 1 • Aircraft viewing area • Nearly 50 new food and retail venues. • North Security Checkpoint A four-gate Terminal 2 expansion opened October 20, providing room for growth by incumbent carriers Southwest and Sun Country – and for new entrants to the market. The Terminal 2 expansion includes a facility for nursing mothers and an indoor pet relief area. • In the past year, MSP has welcomed nearly 50 new retail shops and restaurants. • This year, the MAC has launched a competitive process to select some 30 additional restaurant concepts to open in 2018 and 2019. Preparing for the Future MSP is likely to serve more than 50 million passengers annually by 2035. To meet demand, the MAC plans to invest $1.6 billion in airport improvements over the next several years – and $2.5 billion by 2035. Through 2020, both the ticketing and baggage claim levels at Terminal 1- Lindbergh will be completely remodeled. • Changes in elevator and escalator placement will make moving between levels of Terminal 1 more intuitive • The goal is for people to move easily between ticketing, bag claim, parking and ground transportation with less congestion New designs aim to: • Increase passenger processing efficiency • Provide better sight lines • Create additional walk space • Increase the amount of daylight filtering into the spaces • Fewer but larger baggage carousels will be installed, providing adequate space for the number of checked bags projected to be processed through 2050. • Services such as restrooms, help desks, and food and retail will be consolidated into one central location—on both baggage claim and ticketing levels—making it easier to find those amenities and meet up with others. Graves Hospitality is developing a 300-room InterContinental Hotel, to be completed in the summer of 2018. • A skyway will connect Terminal 1 at the intersections of concourses A, B and C to the InterContinental hotel and, eventually, to an expanded Concourse G. • A hotel security checkpoint will provide its customers with direct access to the skyway and the terminal beyond. Parking and Roadways Work is underway on the hotel, parking management building, exit plaza and roadway changes, with construction of a new 5,000-space parking ramp to commence this summer. Economic Impact • Construction on these four projects alone will generate more than 2,000 full-time equivalent jobs: - Terminal 2 gate expansion - Terminal 1 vertical circulation and bag claim & ticketing remodeling - Hotel skyway - New Terminal 1 parking ramp and related roadway changes $10.1 Billion 76,340 Total Economic Jobs Output
$5.7 Billion $3 Billion Direct Economic Employee Earnings Impact
$611 Million Tax Revenues
$1.9 Billion Visitor Spending Additional Accolades
• Environmental Achievement Award: • Travelers’ Choice Favorite Special/Innovative Projects Trip Advisor Airports Council International-North America • Sustainable Infrastructure Award Airports Going Green • Excellence in Concessions • Technology and Innovation Award Airports Council International-North America MNDoT Office of Environmental Stewardship • Environmental Leader Project of the Year • 3rd Most Efficiently Managed Airport in the World Environmental Leader Project Awards Air Transport Research Society • Top 10 US Airport • Top 5 in the World Easiest to Get To Conde Nast Traveler MSN • 5th Most Affordable Large U.S. Airport • America’s Best Bathroom Cheapflights Cintas This year, Airports Council International named MSP the Best Airport in North America in its size category.
The ranking is based on results of passenger surveys in 34 key performance areas through the global Airport Service Quality Program. MSP International won a World Airport Award from Skytrax in 2017 for Best Airport Staff in North America.
The award is based on surveys of more than 13.8 million travelers worldwide rating airports on service. Questions? Join our news network: Metroairports.org MSPAirport.com
Follow us: twitter.com/mspairport facebook.com/mspairport Instagram: @mspairport NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 4: Review of Monthly Operations Reports: March MAY 17, 2017 and April 2017 MSP OPERATIONS
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 36,235 2,441 33,971 2,143 Operations Nighttime Operations Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)
50,000
40,000
30,000
39,930
39,856
37,887
37,880
37,855
37,306
37,132
36,885
36,750
36,734
36,689
36,377
36,235
36,227
35,659
35,542
35,167
35,119
34,966
34,906
34,595
34,377
34,331
34,270
34,052
33,969 33,971
33,827
33,758
33,409
33,293
33,103
33,085
33,048
32,887
32,686
32,613
32,356
32,102
31,896
31,868
31,597 31,371
20,000 31,256
30,020
29,825
29,772 29,038
10,000 MSP OPERATIONS
0
13 14 15 16
13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
- - - -
------
------
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
SEP SEP SEP SEP
MAY MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP OPERATIONS
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 36,235 2,441 33,971 2,143 Operations Nighttime Operations Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)
3,500 ARR DEP
3,000 2,977
2,629 2,441
2,500 2,421
2,152
2,143
2,127
2,124
2,029
2,010
1,967
1,915
1,910
1,901
1,874
1,871
1,870
1,854
1,840
1,817
1,804
1,787 1,766
2,000 1,755
1,737
1,727
1,725
1,684
1,639
1,632
1,625
1,585
1,573
1,562
1,547
1,527
1,511
1,506
1,487
1,422
1,404
1,389
1,375 1,317
1,500 1,250
1,179
1,163 1,090 1,000
500
0
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
- - - -
------
- - - -
------
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR RUNWAY USE MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017
NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW 42% 50% 2% 44% 43% 7%
M N S 65% 70% 54% 50% 44% 60%
50%
40%
30% 43% 20% 42% 33% 26% 10%
0%
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
- - - -
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
SEP SEP SEP SEP
MAY MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR CARRIER JET FLEET MIX
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017
42% 40%
54% 57%
3% 2%
NARROWBODY RJ NON-CARRIER WIDEBODY 60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17
14 15 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
------
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY MAY
SEP SEP SEP SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000 13,907
13,244
13,196
12,827
12,475
12,211
12,227
12,222
12,139
12,035
12,012 11,664
8,000 11,501
11,138
11,063
10,878
10,831
9,983
9,974
9,676
9,629
9,500
10,040
9,243 9,075
6,000 8,894
8,720
8,601
7,939
7,855
7,594
7,457
7,444
7,321
7,241 6,976
4,000 6,955
6,546
6,318
6,264
6,054
5,913
5,547
5,510
5,314 5,227
2,000 4,974 4,070
0
13 14 15 16
13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16
14 15 16 17
14 15 16 17
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY MAY
SEP SEP SEP SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
- - - -
------
- - - -
------
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3
AVERAGE MEDIAN 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
0
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17
14 15 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
------
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY MAY
SEP SEP SEP SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS
MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
------
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING
March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above
N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65
509 H 7 M 5 S
520 H 9 M 46 S
543 H 51 M 38 S
474 H 6 M 9 S
500 H 25 M 3 S
518 H 27 M 19 S
490 H 4 M 28 S
481 H 5 M 17 S
506 H 47 M 50 S
506 H 10 M 32 S
503 H 50 M 48 S
500 H 41 M 49 S
499 H 53 M 16 S
496 H 41 M 35 S
488 H 39 M 27 S
487 H 26 M 31 S
483 H 11 M 40 S
484 H 39 M 41 S
455 H 51 M 1 S
453 H 46 M 8 S
478 H 53 M 41 S
474 H 48 M 47 S
474 H 43 M 20 S 474 H 44 M 25 S
447 H 0 M 21 S
470 H 25 M 14 S 470 H 22 M 29 S
436 H 40 M 5 S
457 H 11 M 54 S
431 H 6 M 53 S
454 H 45 M 21 S
453 H 38 M 23 S
451 H 33 M 22 S
449 H 19 M 45 S
447 H 40 M 33 S
273 H 58 M 5 S
331 H 12 M 44 S 226 H 16 M 55 S 387 H 39 M 41 S 352 H 16 M 56 S 374 H 36 M 54 S 337 H 44 M 26 S 268 H 15 M 48 S 342 H 52 M 57 S 363 H 21 M 15 S 388 H 27 M 45 S 363 H 58 M 45 S 391 H 31 M 59 S
13 14 15 16
13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16
14 15 16 17
14 15 16 17
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY MAY
SEP SEP SEP SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING
March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65
120,000
100,000
80,000
99,132
98,463
98,242
97,907
101,946
101,693
96,602
95,858
95,553
95,333
95,134
94,149
93,929
93,824
93,646
93,250
92,444
92,253
92,231
92,171
92,096
91,995
91,967
90,823
89,774
89,765
89,367 89,140
60,000 88,231
87,071
85,986
85,909
83,148
82,741
81,650
77,407
77,125
75,454
75,415
74,224
70,424
70,343 68,112
40,000 68,049
67,073
56,930 56,490
20,000 48,172
0
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
------
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING
March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
------
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING
March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
13 14 15 16
13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16
14 15 16 17
14 15 16 17
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY MAY
SEP SEP SEP SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING
March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65
TIME ABOVE 65 DBA PER EVENT
21
20.1 19.7
20 19.6
19.5
19.5
19.4
19.4
19.2
19.2
19.2
19.0
19.0
19.0
18.7
18.7
18.7
18.7
18.7
18.7 18.7
19 18.6
18.6
18.6
18.5
18.5
18.4
18.4
18.4
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.1
18.0
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.8
17.8
17.7
17.7 17.7
18 17.7
17.5
17.5
17.5 17.0
17 16.9 SECONDS 16
15
13 14 15 16
13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16
14 15 16 17
14 15 16 17
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
MAY MAY MAY MAY
SEP SEP SEP SEP
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT
March 2017 April 2017
Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%
Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%
Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%
100.0%
99.5%
99.0%
98.5%
98.0%
97.5%
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
SEP SEP SEP SEP
MAY MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT
March 2017 April 2017
Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%
Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%
Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%
100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82%
80%
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
13 14 15 16
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
SEP SEP SEP SEP
MAY MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT
March 2017 April 2017
Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%
Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%
Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%
DAY USAGE NIGHT USAGE 80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
SEP SEP SEP SEP
MAY MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT
March 2017 April 2017
Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%
Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%
Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%
30,000 ARR DEP RUS 60%
25,000 50%
20,000 40% 9,221
15,000 9,373 30%
9,377
11,256
10,947
9,096
10,731
6,807
8,261
9,535
10,993
9,354
7,389
10,385
9,216
7,081
8,014
5,679
9,185
8,374
6,006
5,176
11,432
8,279
9,175
8,542
10,369
7,999
8,896
11,090
8,519
10,463
10,465
11,122
8,564 6,957
7,317
3,722
7,856
7,289
6,221
11,069
5,491
11,656
5,751
3,824 10,397
10,000 5,819 20%
13,095
12,692
12,536
12,281
11,892
11,881
11,764
11,353
11,176
11,097
9,987 9,989
5,000 9,964 10%
9,640
10,669
9,570
9,554
9,473
9,466
10,452
9,413
10,420
9,384
9,369
9,362
10,293
10,207
9,146
9,140
9,072
9,030
9,005
8,939
8,763
8,712
8,685
8,488
8,418
8,357
8,187
7,676
7,536
7,362
7,257
6,841
6,045 5,888
0 5,229 0%
13 14 15 16
13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17
13 14 15 16
13 14 15 16
14 15 16 17
- - - -
- - - -
------
- - - -
- - - -
JUL JUL JUL JUL
JAN JAN JAN JAN
SEP SEP SEP SEP
MAY MAY MAY MAY
NOV NOV NOV NOV
MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 5: FAA Converging Runway Operations Update – MAY 17, 2017 Kurt Mara, FAA Converging Federal Aviation Administration Runway Display Aid (CRDA)
Presented to: MSP Noise Oversight Committee
May 9th, 2017
By: Kurt Mara, MSP/M98/NPD TMO Federal Aviation 88 Administration What is it?
• CRDA allows the approach controllers to align or sequence traffic from a final to one runway with a final to another runway. • This is accomplished by copying an actual target on the final of the first runway and “ghosting” the target on the final of a second runway.
Federal Aviation 89 Administration When will it be used at MSP?
• We currently use CRDA when on an 22/17 configuration while land and hold short operations are not available (due to winds or contaminant on the runway). • MSP will begin to use CRDA whenever we are on a 30L/30R/35 converging runway operation (CRO).
Federal Aviation 90 Administration Why use CRDA?
• During runway 17/22 operations, CRDA will ensure the arrivals don’t land simultaneously on both runways. • During normal operations, MSP Tower uses land and hold short operations (LAHSO). If there is a contaminant on the runway or a tailwind for one of the runways, LAHSO is not available. CRDA must be used.
Federal Aviation 91 Administration 17/22 Operation
Federal Aviation 92 Administration Why use CRDA?
• CRDA will help to optimize departure gaps during CRO operations by aligning the arrival traffic – The goal is for this operation is to help the arrival on Runway 35 line up with the arrival on Runway 30L so the departure gap is not missed due to the arrival/departure window (ADW).
Federal Aviation 93 Administration What does it look like?
• As you will see in the next slides… – With the arrival aircraft established on Runway 30L, a “ghost” target will be displayed on Runway 35. – The arrival controller for Runway 35 will vector traffic to line up within 1 mile of the ghost target.
Federal Aviation 94 Administration What does it look like? (cont.)
– As the arrival aircraft lands on Runway 30L, the tower controller taxis the next departure into position waiting to go. At this time, the arrival aircraft on Runway 35 has just entered the ADW. – As the arrival aircraft on Runway 30L exits the runway, the arrival aircraft on Runway 35 will exit the ADW and the tower controller can clear the departure aircraft for takeoff on Runway 30L.
Federal Aviation 95 Administration Federal Aviation 96 Administration Federal Aviation 97 Administration Federal Aviation 98 Administration Federal Aviation 99 Administration What about Runway 30R?
• Currently, there is no way to ghost traffic to 2 runways simultaneously. • During visual approach conditions, the goal of the approach controllers will be to align the traffic on Runway 30R next to traffic lined up for Runway 30L. – This will help with the departure gap for traffic departing Runway 30R.
Federal Aviation 100 Administration What about Runway 30R? (cont.)
BUT…. – During instrument landing conditions, our rules require the traffic on the finals to be staggered. This will limit the benefit to departure from Runway 30R. – Therefore, there won’t be a gain to the departure traffic in this situation. – So…the departure traffic will be handled the way it is today.
Federal Aviation 101 Administration How does it help?
In addition to improving the efficiency of the airport by optimizing the departure gap for the tower controller, it will increase the safety of the operation. – It does this by aiding the tower controller in separating the departures from the parallel runway from the arrivals to Runway 35
Federal Aviation 102 Administration How does it help? (cont.) The long term belief is that we may be able to increase our arrival efficiency at MSP as well for short periods throughout the day. – By increasing the departure efficiency, we will be able to finish the departure banks earlier. With little to no departures waiting to go, the spacing on Runway 35 can be reduced. – With a reduction in spacing, our arrival rate may be increased. – The gain will be more evident when the arrival and departure banks are slightly spread out.
Federal Aviation 103 Administration Questions?
Federal Aviation 104 Administration Thank You!
Federal Aviation 105 Administration NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 6: Delta Air Lines Fleet Mix Update – Captain MAY 17, 2017 Gordy Goss, Delta Air Lines DELTA AIR LINES FLEET PLAN AS OF SPRING 2017 (Mainline Fleet Only) Boeing 747-400
• B-747-400 Fleet is retiring as of DEC 2017 • Currently only 7 remain in service • No Regular Schedule through MSP Boeing 777
• B-777 -200ER/LR • Total of 18 in service • Currently flies MSP – HND (Tokyo) and MSP – CDG (Paris) • No Crew Base in MSP Airbus A-350
• AIRBUS A – 350 • Long Range Flights (747/777 type) Approx 320 seats • 25 on order. 15 to be delivered 2017 – 2019. 10 pushed back beyond 2019 • Not planning to fly from MSP on a consistent basis in near future Airbus A-330
• Airbus A-330 -200/-300/-900 • 32 in Service. 25 on Order for Delivery 2019-2022 • Majority of European Service from MSP (AMS, CDG, LHR, plus HNL and Flex) Boeing 767
• B-767 -300/-300ER/-400 • Currently 82 in Service • Flies some MSP – Europe (AMS/CDG/LHR, plus some HNL, CUN, Domestic) • Will remain in fleet through mid – 2020s • Crew base in MSP w/ B-757 Boeing 757
• B – 757 -200/-300 • Currently 104 in Service • Flies mostly Domestic (including Alaska) • Crew Base in MSP w/ B-767 Boeing 737
• B- 737 -700/-800 Currently 87 in Service • B-737 -900 Currently 75 in Service • 55 -900’s on Order to be Delivered 2017-2019 • Flies primarily Domestic. Crew Base in MSP Airbus A-320
• Airbus A-319/320 • Currently 125 in Service. Flies mainly Domestic • Crew Base in MSP Airbus A-321
• Airbus A-321 • Currently 19 flying • 112 on firm order for delivery 2017-2021 • Crew Base in MSP Boeing 717
B-717 Currently 91 in Service Out of Production. No additional on order No Crew Base in MSP MD-90
• McDonnell Douglas MD – 90. • Currently 65 in Service • Out of Production • Crew Base in MSP MD-88
• McDonnell Douglass MD-88 • Out of Production • 116 Currently in Service (note: MD-88 slated to retire DEC 2020*) • Note engine difference between MD-88 and MD-90s in background • Crew Base in MSP Bombardier CS-100/300
• CS 100 = 110 Seats. CS 300 = 132 Seats. A-350/B-787 Ergonomics • 75 Aircraft on firm order. 50 options • First Delivery Spring 2018. In Service Summer 2018 • Long Range. Extremely Quiet (Stage 5) • Will not initially be based in MSP TECHNOLOGY IS YOUR FRIEND DELTA AIR LINES
WE STRIVE TO BE INNOVATIVE, THOUGHTFUL, RELIABLE • THROUGHOUT THE U.S. WE ARE UPGAUGING A/C, REDUCING RJs • WE STRIVE TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS BECAUSE WE ARE NEIGHBORS (13,000+ in MN) • WE ARE REDUCING OUR CARBON AND NOISE FOOTPRINT • NEW AIRCRAFT DELIVERIES AND ORDERS • (45 in 2017. 61 in 2018. 71 in 2019) • Quieter, More Fuel Efficient, Less Carbon Output • Additional Narrow-body Orders Possible: (A-320neo/B-737MAX/CS-500) DO YOU REALLY WANT TO TRAVEL TO NYC ON THIS: NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 7: Interactive Reports Demonstration MAY 17, 2017 Item 7: Interactive Reports Demonstration The report consolidates existing reports into four functional areas: At the March 2017 NOC meeting, the Committee directed • Operations Staff to begin producing a new MSP Monthly Operations • Complaints Summary Report. • Sound Monitoring • Noise Abatement
The new report is intended to give readers a summary of Expected Launch: these four areas in a brief and easily understood format • May Reporting Cycle – June 12, 2017
Much of the existing report data does not exist in this new report. To replace this data, the Noise Office built a full replacement application that combines data from the Reports on the Fly section and existing reports Item 7: Interactive Reports Demonstration
Requested Action APPROVE THE NEW WEBSITE INTERACTIVE REPORTING CAPABILITIES AND DIRECT STAFF TO DISCONTINUE THE PRODUCTION OF THE MONTHLY TECHNICAL ADVISOR’S REPORT, EAGAN-MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR REPORT, RUNWAY 17 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT, CROSSING-IN-THE-CORRIDOR ANALYSIS REPORT AND THE MSP RUNWAY USE SYSTEM REPORT. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 8: New Aircraft Noise Basics Videos MAY 17, 2017 NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 9: Review of January 25 and April 19 Listening MAY 17, 2017 Sessions
6 residents attended the Winter Listening Session. All questions were answered at the meeting, therefore staff did not prepare written responses. Comments/questions from the residents focused on: Converging Runway Operations (CRO) and the increased frequency of arrivals on Runways 12L and 12R Residential Noise Mitigation Program eligibility Increase in flights during early morning hours Area Navigation (RNAV) arrival procedures New aircraft use at MSP to reduce noise from the source Altitude of aircraft NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 9: Review of January 25 and April 19 Listening MAY 17, 2017 Sessions
19 residents attended the Spring Listening Session held in Eagan. Presentation slides from both Listening Sessions are available at http://www.macnoise.com/our-neighbors/msp-quarterly-listening- All questions were answered at the meeting, therefore staff did not sessions prepare written responses. The comments/questions from the residents focused on: At the end of each meeting, staff asked for feedback about the meeting format. Comments indicated: Measures being taken by the FAA in an effort to return runway use • attendees appreciate the diverse mix of representatives from the MAC, levels back to pre-Converging Runway Operations levels FAA, the NOC and airlines and the willingness to openly discuss Runway 17 departure frequency Enacting penalties and/or disincentives for nighttime operations individual concerns. Runway Use System (RUS) prioritization • Pleased with the restructured meeting format, which allowed for good Airport capacity and operational forecasts dialogue and that they felt listened to New aircraft to reduce noise at the source
The next Listening Session is July 26, 2017 at 7:00 PM in Apple Valley NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 10: Public Comment MAY 17, 2017 NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 11: Announcements MAY 17, 2017
Next NOC meeting July 19, 2017 @ 1:30 PM MAC General Offices 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450