<<

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAY 17, 2017

Audio recordings are made of this meeting NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 1: Review and Approval of March 15, 2017 MAY 17, 2017 Meeting Minutes NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Results MAY 17, 2017 Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results NEXTGEN AT MSP A NON-TRADITIONAL PATH • In 2005 request to FAA for MSP to be a test site for Continuous Descent Arrivals – request was denied • In July 2007 – NOC began investigating evolving navigation technology to reduce noise, identified RNAV as an opportunity • OPDs viewed as a critical element • July 2009 – Crossing-in-Corridor and Runway 17 River RNAV Departures submitted to the FAA Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results

CONSENSUS BY ALL STAKEHOLDERS ON A FUTURE NOC RESOLUTION 01-2014 SOLUTION • Hearing community concerns early on • NOC Supports RNAV arrivals with OPDs • Establishing and communicating a • A case study of successful RNAV departure implementation at another airport with similar framework for future RNAV departure challenges, particularly, dense population surrounding procedure design the airport – Resource allocation • Future RNAV departure designs and implementation incorporates framework for outreach – Early public outreach – Holistic public outreach – Place local FAA personnel in leadership position to communicate with the airport and community AIRPORT LEADING THE CHARGE TO QUANTIFY OPD BENEFITS

Identify OPD Flights

Apply Fuel Savings

Aggregate Fuel Savings

Calculate Carbon Emission Reduction Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results

PARTNERS

Model Consultation and Verification Flight Track Data Operational Fuel Validation Airports Planning NextGen Data MSP Tower, and Environmental Systems Airlines TRACON and Division Analysis and Center Modeling Office Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results

PROCESS Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results FLIGHT DATA – MACNOMS

DATA

FLIGHT DATA – MSP TRACON (M98) FLIGHT DATA – MSP ARTCC (ZMP) Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results

DATA

• Data from Minneapolis Center used in the OPD Application – Data point every 15 seconds – Range captures full descent – Source data rounds altitudes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results APPLICATION OUTPUTS

FLIGHT ATTRIBUTES DESCENT STATISTICS • MSP Arrival Date/Time • Top of Descent 4-D Location • Aircraft Type • Descent Distance to 8,000 • Arrival Runway • Descent Distance to ground • Origin Airport • Percent of Descent in Level • Airspace Arrival Gate Flight

CRUISE STATISTICS FUEL STATISTICS • Ring Intersection Location • Fuel Burn Rate • Distance and Time Flown to • Fuel Burn Reduction Value Ground Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results 8,000feet Evaluateaircraft descentsbetween “top ofdescent”and

OPD DETERMINING OPD TRAJECTORY - approachsegmentof the descent RNAV • • Thiswas determination levelflight is descentLess than10%of controllers collaborationwith FAA individualandobservations withof developedvalidation arrivalproceduresendbefore the final

NON-OPD • • • 12,000 feet 12,000 neverreached that Flights Non levelflight descentis of or more 10% - Jet Aircraft Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results FLG 4002 Aircraft Type: CRJ-200 Arrival Time: 2014-03-04 17:13 Origin Airport: XNA – Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Arrival Runway: 12L Arrival Airspace Gate: NITZR Top of Descent Altitude: 28,800 feet Descent Distance: 163 nm Percent Level: 31% Ring Stats: 50 nm time = 27.2 minutes 100 nm time = 36.4 minutes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results DAL2485 Aircraft Type: B737-900 Arrival Time: 2014-07-15 22:45 Origin Airport: SEA – Seattle International Airport Arrival Runway: 30R Arrival Airspace Gate: Top of Descent Altitude: 36,791 feet Descent Distance: 135 nm Percent Level: 14% Ring Stats: 50 nm time = 16.6 minutes 100 nm time = 23.4 minutes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results FLG3678 Aircraft Type: CRJ-900 Arrival Time: 2016-11-26 08:01 Origin Airport: MSO – Missoula Montana Airport Arrival Runway: 30R Arrival Airspace Gate: BAINY Top of Descent Altitude: 32,892 feet Descent Distance: 153 nm Percent Level: 8.9% Ring Stats: 50 nm Time = 17.7 minutes 100 nm Time = 25.6 minutes Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results DAL1088 Aircraft Type: B757-200 Arrival Time: 2016-12-07 4:13 Origin Airport: ANC – Anchorage International Arrival Runway: 12R Arrival Airspace Gate: BAINY Top of Descent Altitude: 38,789 feet Descent Distance: 116 nm Percent Level: 0.0% Ring Stats: 50 NM Time = 11.0 minutes 100 NM Time = 18.7 minutes RESULTS Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD USAGE 79.4%

OF ALL CAPABLE MSP ARRIVALS HAVE AN OPD DESCENT PROFILE Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results MSP CONTINUOUS DESCENT ARRIVALS JET AIRCRAFT OVERALL PERCENTAGE MONTHLY PERCENTAGE 100% 90% 80% OPD USAGE 70% 60% 50% 79.4% 40% IMPLEMENTATION 79.4% 30% 20% 39.0% 10%

OF ALL CAPABLE MSP ARRIVALS HAVE AN OPD 0% (OPD) RNAV

14 15 16

14 15 16 17

14 15 16

14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17

- - -

- - - -

- - -

------

DESCENT PROFILE -

JUL JUL JUL

SEP SEP SEP

JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR

Overall Percentage Daily Usage 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% IMPLEMENTATION 20% 10%

0% (OPD) RNAV

1-Mar 8-Mar

15-Mar 22-Mar 29-Mar Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED FUEL BURN BY 15.1

GALLONS OF FUEL PER FLIGHT Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED FUEL BURN BY 2,892,385

GALLONS OF FUEL ANNUALLY Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED FUEL BURN BY 5,816,467

GALLONS OF FUEL SINCE IMPLEMENTATION Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS BY 28,465

METRIC TONS ANNUALLY Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results OPD HAS REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS BY 57,243

METRIC TONS SINCE IMPLEMENTATION Item 2: MSP Optimized Profile Descent Results

REMOVING REDUCING MILES REDUCING CO2 RECYCLING INSTEAD RECYCLING INSTEAD OF 12,092 DRIVEN ON EMISSIONS FROM OF LANDFILLING LANDFILLING CARS FROM ROADS BY 6,441,206 18,166 2,595 THE ROAD 137,191,757 GALLONS OF TONS OF WASTE GARBAGE TRUCKS OF WASTE AUTOMOBILE GAS

ELIMINATING THE CHANGING PLANTING PLANTING HAVING A SOLAR FIELD AT ENERGY USED AT 2,029,174 1,483,518 54,186 MSP THAT IS 6,045 INCANDESCENT LIGHT TREES AND LETTING ACRES OF 2.5 HOMES BULBS TO LED THEM GROW FOR 10 FOREST TIMES ITS CURRENT SIZE YEARS NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 3: Guest Speaker: MSP Update by Executive MAY 17, 2017 Director/CEO, Brian Ryks MSP Update

Brian Ryks, Executive Director and CEO Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Airports Commission

• Public corporation created by Minnesota Legislature • Owns and operates seven airports within the Twin Cities metro area • User-fee based funding • Limited property taxing authority unused since 1960s Legislated Purpose

• Promote efficient, safe, and economical air commerce • Develop the full potentialities of the metropolitan area as an aviation center • Minimize the environmental impact from air transportation and the public’s exposure to noise and safety hazards around airports Our Board Commission Chair District A Disctrict B District C Daniel Boivin Carl Crimmins Rick King Katie Clark Sieben

• Governor appoints chairman and 12 District D District E District F District G Steve Cramer James Deal Michael Madigan Richard Ginsberg commissioners (eight metro, four greater Minnesota) who serve four-year, staggered terms • Minneapolis and St. Paul mayors each appoint District H City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul Outstate St. Cloud one Ibrahim Mohamed Erica Prosser Pat Harris Patti Gartland

Outstate Duluth Outstate Thief River Falls Outstate Rochester Metropolitan Airports Donald Monaco Dixie Hoard Randy Schubring Commission Our Mission Connecting you to your world Our Vision Providing your best airport experience Minneapolis – St. Paul International Airport • 16th busiest airport in North America (passengers) • 15th busiest in operations • ’ 2nd largest hub Operational Funding Concessions 11% Parking and Ground Transportation • Conservative forecasting: nowhere to turn 37% except reserves or short-term financing • Financial model predicated only on originating Airline Rates and and destination passengers Charges • Maintain six-month reserve 33% • AA- bond rating

Utilities Rents and and Other Fees 5% 14% MAC Airport System Operations

1,000,000

900,000

800,000 MSP experienced 413,279 700,000 and takeoffs in 2016, the 600,000 first increase (2.1%) since 2013, but still well below the 2004 500,000 record of 541,093 operations. 400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Reliever Operations 530,726 449,619 423,931 389,843 377,093 386,383 363,190 332,383 306,532 348,701 322,291 MSP Operations 477,212 452,972 450,044 432,395 437,075 436,506 425,332 431,418 412,586 404,612 413,279 Passenger Numbers Near Record Levels

37,604,373 37,505,521 40,000,000

35,000,000

30,000,000

25,000,000

20,000,000

15,000,000

10,000,000

5,000,000

0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Traveler Demographics: 21 or Trips more 11 to 20 6% 10%

1 to 2 Number of Trips Annually from MSP 39% • Nearly two-thirds of travelers fly five or fewer 6 to 10 times each year. 16% • Only 16% fly 11 or more times.

3 to 5 29% Traveler Demographics: Business or Leisure? Other 16% Business 32% Reason for Travel • More than half the people traveling at MSP are doing so for leisure. • Nearly one-third are business travelers.

Leisure 52% Traveler Demographics: 76-Older Age 3% 16-21 65-75 6% 22-25 13% 7%

26-34 11%

55-64 27% 35-44 14%

45-54 19% Traveler Demographics: Gender

Male 40%

Female 60% Air Service Success Measures

• Major, stable Delta hub • Base for Sun Country Airlines • Additions since 2008: • Alaska Air, 2008 • , 2009 • Spirit, 2012 • Air France, 2013 • Condor, 2014 • Boutique, 2016 • Air Choice One, 2016 • KLM, 2017 • Competitive incentives program Air Service Added in 2016-17

Ten airlines added a total of 24 additional routes from MSP in 2016 and 2017. MSP now enjoys competitive air service on a record 53 of its total 155 direct routes. Operating Sustainably Most extensive noise mitigation program in U.S.

Optimized profile Phase 1 carbon descent use and accreditation measurement application Operating Sustainably First green roof at Terminal 2

3 megawatt solar 1.3 megawatt solar energy facility at facility at Terminal Terminal 1 2 Reimagine MSP Recent Improvements

• Expanded Terminal 1 international arrivals area • Terminal 2: new auto rental facilities • Quick Ride Ramp at Terminal 1 • Aircraft viewing area • Nearly 50 new food and retail venues. • North Security Checkpoint A four-gate Terminal 2 expansion opened October 20, providing room for growth by incumbent carriers Southwest and Sun Country – and for new entrants to the market. The Terminal 2 expansion includes a facility for nursing mothers and an indoor pet relief area. • In the past year, MSP has welcomed nearly 50 new retail shops and restaurants. • This year, the MAC has launched a competitive process to select some 30 additional restaurant concepts to open in 2018 and 2019. Preparing for the Future MSP is likely to serve more than 50 million passengers annually by 2035. To meet demand, the MAC plans to invest $1.6 billion in airport improvements over the next several years – and $2.5 billion by 2035. Through 2020, both the ticketing and baggage claim levels at Terminal 1- Lindbergh will be completely remodeled. • Changes in elevator and escalator placement will make moving between levels of Terminal 1 more intuitive • The goal is for people to move easily between ticketing, bag claim, parking and ground transportation with less congestion New designs aim to: • Increase passenger processing efficiency • Provide better sight lines • Create additional walk space • Increase the amount of daylight filtering into the spaces • Fewer but larger baggage carousels will be installed, providing adequate space for the number of checked bags projected to be processed through 2050. • Services such as restrooms, help desks, and food and retail will be consolidated into one central location—on both baggage claim and ticketing levels—making it easier to find those amenities and meet up with others. Graves Hospitality is developing a 300-room InterContinental Hotel, to be completed in the summer of 2018. • A skyway will connect Terminal 1 at the intersections of concourses A, B and C to the InterContinental hotel and, eventually, to an expanded Concourse G. • A hotel security checkpoint will provide its customers with direct access to the skyway and the terminal beyond. Parking and Roadways Work is underway on the hotel, parking management building, exit plaza and roadway changes, with construction of a new 5,000-space parking ramp to commence this summer. Economic Impact • Construction on these four projects alone will generate more than 2,000 full-time equivalent jobs: - Terminal 2 gate expansion - Terminal 1 vertical circulation and bag claim & ticketing remodeling - Hotel skyway - New Terminal 1 parking ramp and related roadway changes $10.1 Billion 76,340 Total Economic Jobs Output

$5.7 Billion $3 Billion Direct Economic Employee Earnings Impact

$611 Million Tax Revenues

$1.9 Billion Visitor Spending Additional Accolades

• Environmental Achievement Award: • Travelers’ Choice Favorite Special/Innovative Projects Trip Advisor Airports Council International-North America • Sustainable Infrastructure Award Airports Going Green • Excellence in Concessions • Technology and Innovation Award Airports Council International-North America MNDoT Office of Environmental Stewardship • Environmental Leader Project of the Year • 3rd Most Efficiently Managed Airport in the World Environmental Leader Project Awards Air Transport Research Society • Top 10 US Airport • Top 5 in the World Easiest to Get To Conde Nast Traveler MSN • 5th Most Affordable Large U.S. Airport • America’s Best Bathroom Cheapflights Cintas This year, Airports Council International named MSP the Best Airport in North America in its size category.

The ranking is based on results of passenger surveys in 34 key performance areas through the global Airport Service Quality Program. MSP International won a World Airport Award from Skytrax in 2017 for Best Airport Staff in North America.

The award is based on surveys of more than 13.8 million travelers worldwide rating airports on service. Questions? Join our news network: Metroairports.org MSPAirport.com

Follow us: twitter.com/mspairport facebook.com/mspairport Instagram: @mspairport NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 4: Review of Monthly Operations Reports: March MAY 17, 2017 and April 2017 MSP OPERATIONS

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 36,235 2,441 33,971 2,143 Operations Nighttime Operations Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

50,000

40,000

30,000

39,930

39,856

37,887

37,880

37,855

37,306

37,132

36,885

36,750

36,734

36,689

36,377

36,235

36,227

35,659

35,542

35,167

35,119

34,966

34,906

34,595

34,377

34,331

34,270

34,052

33,969 33,971

33,827

33,758

33,409

33,293

33,103

33,085

33,048

32,887

32,686

32,613

32,356

32,102

31,896

31,868

31,597 31,371

20,000 31,256

30,020

29,825

29,772 29,038

10,000 MSP OPERATIONS

0

13 14 15 16

13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

- - - -

------

------

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

SEP SEP SEP SEP

MAY MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP OPERATIONS

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 36,235 2,441 33,971 2,143 Operations Nighttime Operations Operations Nighttime Operations (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM)

3,500 ARR DEP

3,000 2,977

2,629 2,441

2,500 2,421

2,152

2,143

2,127

2,124

2,029

2,010

1,967

1,915

1,910

1,901

1,874

1,871

1,870

1,854

1,840

1,817

1,804

1,787 1,766

2,000 1,755

1,737

1,727

1,725

1,684

1,639

1,632

1,625

1,585

1,573

1,562

1,547

1,527

1,511

1,506

1,487

1,422

1,404

1,389

1,375 1,317

1,500 1,250

1,179

1,163 1,090 1,000

500

0

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

- - - -

------

- - - -

------

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR RUNWAY USE MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017

NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW NORTH FLOW SOUTH FLOW MIXED FLOW 42% 50% 2% 44% 43% 7%

M N S 65% 70% 54% 50% 44% 60%

50%

40%

30% 43% 20% 42% 33% 26% 10%

0%

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

- - - -

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

SEP SEP SEP SEP

MAY MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR CARRIER JET FLEET MIX

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017

42% 40%

54% 57%

3% 2%

NARROWBODY RJ NON-CARRIER WIDEBODY 60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17

14 15 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

------

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY MAY

SEP SEP SEP SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3

16,000

14,000

12,000

10,000 13,907

13,244

13,196

12,827

12,475

12,211

12,227

12,222

12,139

12,035

12,012 11,664

8,000 11,501

11,138

11,063

10,878

10,831

9,983

9,974

9,676

9,629

9,500

10,040

9,243 9,075

6,000 8,894

8,720

8,601

7,939

7,855

7,594

7,457

7,444

7,321

7,241 6,976

4,000 6,955

6,546

6,318

6,264

6,054

5,913

5,547

5,510

5,314 5,227

2,000 4,974 4,070

0

13 14 15 16

13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16

14 15 16 17

14 15 16 17

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY MAY

SEP SEP SEP SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

- - - -

------

- - - -

------

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3

AVERAGE MEDIAN 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5

0

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 17

14 15 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

------

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY MAY

SEP SEP SEP SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR MSP COMPLAINTS

MARCH 2017 APRIL 2017 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 13,244 331 13,907 407 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 2.7 71 40 3 2.4 96 34 3

8.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

------

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING

March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above

N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65

509 H 7 M 5 S

520 H 9 M 46 S

543 H 51 M 38 S

474 H 6 M 9 S

500 H 25 M 3 S

518 H 27 M 19 S

490 H 4 M 28 S

481 H 5 M 17 S

506 H 47 M 50 S

506 H 10 M 32 S

503 H 50 M 48 S

500 H 41 M 49 S

499 H 53 M 16 S

496 H 41 M 35 S

488 H 39 M 27 S

487 H 26 M 31 S

483 H 11 M 40 S

484 H 39 M 41 S

455 H 51 M 1 S

453 H 46 M 8 S

478 H 53 M 41 S

474 H 48 M 47 S

474 H 43 M 20 S 474 H 44 M 25 S

447 H 0 M 21 S

470 H 25 M 14 S 470 H 22 M 29 S

436 H 40 M 5 S

457 H 11 M 54 S

431 H 6 M 53 S

454 H 45 M 21 S

453 H 38 M 23 S

451 H 33 M 22 S

449 H 19 M 45 S

447 H 40 M 33 S

273 H 58 M 5 S

331 H 12 M 44 S 226 H 16 M 55 S 387 H 39 M 41 S 352 H 16 M 56 S 374 H 36 M 54 S 337 H 44 M 26 S 268 H 15 M 48 S 342 H 52 M 57 S 363 H 21 M 15 S 388 H 27 M 45 S 363 H 58 M 45 S 391 H 31 M 59 S

13 14 15 16

13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16

14 15 16 17

14 15 16 17

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY MAY

SEP SEP SEP SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING

March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65

120,000

100,000

80,000

99,132

98,463

98,242

97,907

101,946

101,693

96,602

95,858

95,553

95,333

95,134

94,149

93,929

93,824

93,646

93,250

92,444

92,253

92,231

92,171

92,096

91,995

91,967

90,823

89,774

89,765

89,367 89,140

60,000 88,231

87,071

85,986

85,909

83,148

82,741

81,650

77,407

77,125

75,454

75,415

74,224

70,424

70,343 68,112

40,000 68,049

67,073

56,930 56,490

20,000 48,172

0

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

------

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING

March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

------

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP MAY SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING

March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

13 14 15 16

13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16

14 15 16 17

14 15 16 17

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY MAY

SEP SEP SEP SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR SOUND MONITORING

March 2017 April 2017 48 481 5 54 509 7 Time Above s h m Time Above s h m TA65 per operation TA65 TA65 per operation TA65 2.57 93,250 2.81 95,553 Count Above Count Above N65 per operation N65 N65 per operation N65

TIME ABOVE 65 DBA PER EVENT

21

20.1 19.7

20 19.6

19.5

19.5

19.4

19.4

19.2

19.2

19.2

19.0

19.0

19.0

18.7

18.7

18.7

18.7

18.7

18.7 18.7

19 18.6

18.6

18.6

18.5

18.5

18.4

18.4

18.4

18.3

18.3

18.3

18.3

18.1

18.0

17.9

17.9

17.9

17.8

17.8

17.7

17.7 17.7

18 17.7

17.5

17.5

17.5 17.0

17 16.9 SECONDS 16

15

13 14 15 16

13 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16

14 15 16 17

14 15 16 17

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

MAY MAY MAY MAY

SEP SEP SEP SEP

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT

March 2017 April 2017

Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%

Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%

Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%

100.0%

99.5%

99.0%

98.5%

98.0%

97.5%

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

SEP SEP SEP SEP

MAY MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT

March 2017 April 2017

Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%

Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%

Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%

100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82%

80%

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

13 14 15 16

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

SEP SEP SEP SEP

MAY MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT

March 2017 April 2017

Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%

Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%

Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%

DAY USAGE NIGHT USAGE 80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

SEP SEP SEP SEP

MAY MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE ABATEMENT

March 2017 April 2017

Runway 17 99.7% Runway 17 99.6%

Corridor 90.7% Corridor 88.5%

Day Night Day Night Crossing Crossing 28.8% 38.8% 32.7% 43.0% Overall Arrivals Departures Overall Arrivals Departures RUS RUS 50.7% 51% 51% 52.0% 55% 49%

30,000 ARR DEP RUS 60%

25,000 50%

20,000 40% 9,221

15,000 9,373 30%

9,377

11,256

10,947

9,096

10,731

6,807

8,261

9,535

10,993

9,354

7,389

10,385

9,216

7,081

8,014

5,679

9,185

8,374

6,006

5,176

11,432

8,279

9,175

8,542

10,369

7,999

8,896

11,090

8,519

10,463

10,465

11,122

8,564 6,957

7,317

3,722

7,856

7,289

6,221

11,069

5,491

11,656

5,751

3,824 10,397

10,000 5,819 20%

13,095

12,692

12,536

12,281

11,892

11,881

11,764

11,353

11,176

11,097

9,987 9,989

5,000 9,964 10%

9,640

10,669

9,570

9,554

9,473

9,466

10,452

9,413

10,420

9,384

9,369

9,362

10,293

10,207

9,146

9,140

9,072

9,030

9,005

8,939

8,763

8,712

8,685

8,488

8,418

8,357

8,187

7,676

7,536

7,362

7,257

6,841

6,045 5,888

0 5,229 0%

13 14 15 16

13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17

13 14 15 16

13 14 15 16

14 15 16 17

- - - -

- - - -

------

- - - -

- - - -

JUL JUL JUL JUL

JAN JAN JAN JAN

SEP SEP SEP SEP

MAY MAY MAY MAY

NOV NOV NOV NOV

MAR MAR MAR MAR NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 5: FAA Converging Runway Operations Update – MAY 17, 2017 Kurt Mara, FAA Converging Federal Aviation Administration Runway Display Aid (CRDA)

Presented to: MSP Noise Oversight Committee

May 9th, 2017

By: Kurt Mara, MSP/M98/NPD TMO Federal Aviation 88 Administration What is it?

• CRDA allows the approach controllers to align or sequence traffic from a final to one runway with a final to another runway. • This is accomplished by copying an actual target on the final of the first runway and “ghosting” the target on the final of a second runway.

Federal Aviation 89 Administration When will it be used at MSP?

• We currently use CRDA when on an 22/17 configuration while land and hold short operations are not available (due to winds or contaminant on the runway). • MSP will begin to use CRDA whenever we are on a 30L/30R/35 converging runway operation (CRO).

Federal Aviation 90 Administration Why use CRDA?

• During runway 17/22 operations, CRDA will ensure the arrivals don’t land simultaneously on both runways. • During normal operations, MSP Tower uses land and hold short operations (LAHSO). If there is a contaminant on the runway or a tailwind for one of the runways, LAHSO is not available. CRDA must be used.

Federal Aviation 91 Administration 17/22 Operation

Federal Aviation 92 Administration Why use CRDA?

• CRDA will help to optimize departure gaps during CRO operations by aligning the arrival traffic – The goal is for this operation is to help the arrival on Runway 35 line up with the arrival on Runway 30L so the departure gap is not missed due to the arrival/departure window (ADW).

Federal Aviation 93 Administration What does it look like?

• As you will see in the next slides… – With the arrival aircraft established on Runway 30L, a “ghost” target will be displayed on Runway 35. – The arrival controller for Runway 35 will vector traffic to line up within 1 mile of the ghost target.

Federal Aviation 94 Administration What does it look like? (cont.)

– As the arrival aircraft lands on Runway 30L, the tower controller taxis the next departure into position waiting to go. At this time, the arrival aircraft on Runway 35 has just entered the ADW. – As the arrival aircraft on Runway 30L exits the runway, the arrival aircraft on Runway 35 will exit the ADW and the tower controller can clear the departure aircraft for on Runway 30L.

Federal Aviation 95 Administration Federal Aviation 96 Administration Federal Aviation 97 Administration Federal Aviation 98 Administration Federal Aviation 99 Administration What about Runway 30R?

• Currently, there is no way to ghost traffic to 2 runways simultaneously. • During visual approach conditions, the goal of the approach controllers will be to align the traffic on Runway 30R next to traffic lined up for Runway 30L. – This will help with the departure gap for traffic departing Runway 30R.

Federal Aviation 100 Administration What about Runway 30R? (cont.)

BUT…. – During instrument conditions, our rules require the traffic on the finals to be staggered. This will limit the benefit to departure from Runway 30R. – Therefore, there won’t be a gain to the departure traffic in this situation. – So…the departure traffic will be handled the way it is today.

Federal Aviation 101 Administration How does it help?

In addition to improving the efficiency of the airport by optimizing the departure gap for the tower controller, it will increase the safety of the operation. – It does this by aiding the tower controller in separating the departures from the parallel runway from the arrivals to Runway 35

Federal Aviation 102 Administration How does it help? (cont.) The long term belief is that we may be able to increase our arrival efficiency at MSP as well for short periods throughout the day. – By increasing the departure efficiency, we will be able to finish the departure banks earlier. With little to no departures waiting to go, the spacing on Runway 35 can be reduced. – With a reduction in spacing, our arrival rate may be increased. – The gain will be more evident when the arrival and departure banks are slightly spread out.

Federal Aviation 103 Administration Questions?

Federal Aviation 104 Administration Thank You!

Federal Aviation 105 Administration NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 6: Delta Air Lines Fleet Mix Update – Captain MAY 17, 2017 Gordy Goss, Delta Air Lines DELTA AIR LINES FLEET PLAN AS OF SPRING 2017 (Mainline Fleet Only) -400

• B-747-400 Fleet is retiring as of DEC 2017 • Currently only 7 remain in service • No Regular Schedule through MSP

• B-777 -200ER/LR • Total of 18 in service • Currently flies MSP – HND (Tokyo) and MSP – CDG (Paris) • No Crew Base in MSP A-350

• AIRBUS A – 350 • Long Range Flights (747/777 type) Approx 320 seats • 25 on order. 15 to be delivered 2017 – 2019. 10 pushed back beyond 2019 • Not planning to fly from MSP on a consistent basis in near future Airbus A-330

• Airbus A-330 -200/-300/-900 • 32 in Service. 25 on Order for Delivery 2019-2022 • Majority of European Service from MSP (AMS, CDG, LHR, plus HNL and Flex)

• B-767 -300/-300ER/-400 • Currently 82 in Service • Flies some MSP – Europe (AMS/CDG/LHR, plus some HNL, CUN, Domestic) • Will remain in fleet through mid – 2020s • Crew base in MSP w/ B-757

• B – 757 -200/-300 • Currently 104 in Service • Flies mostly Domestic (including Alaska) • Crew Base in MSP w/ B-767

• B- 737 -700/-800 Currently 87 in Service • B-737 -900 Currently 75 in Service • 55 -900’s on Order to be Delivered 2017-2019 • Flies primarily Domestic. Crew Base in MSP Airbus A-320

• Airbus A-319/320 • Currently 125 in Service. Flies mainly Domestic • Crew Base in MSP Airbus A-321

• Airbus A-321 • Currently 19 flying • 112 on firm order for delivery 2017-2021 • Crew Base in MSP

B-717 Currently 91 in Service Out of Production. No additional on order No Crew Base in MSP MD-90

• McDonnell Douglas MD – 90. • Currently 65 in Service • Out of Production • Crew Base in MSP MD-88

• McDonnell Douglass MD-88 • Out of Production • 116 Currently in Service (note: MD-88 slated to retire DEC 2020*) • Note engine difference between MD-88 and MD-90s in background • Crew Base in MSP Bombardier CS-100/300

• CS 100 = 110 Seats. CS 300 = 132 Seats. A-350/B-787 Ergonomics • 75 Aircraft on firm order. 50 options • First Delivery Spring 2018. In Service Summer 2018 • Long Range. Extremely Quiet (Stage 5) • Will not initially be based in MSP TECHNOLOGY IS YOUR FRIEND DELTA AIR LINES

WE STRIVE TO BE INNOVATIVE, THOUGHTFUL, RELIABLE • THROUGHOUT THE U.S. WE ARE UPGAUGING A/C, REDUCING RJs • WE STRIVE TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS BECAUSE WE ARE NEIGHBORS (13,000+ in MN) • WE ARE REDUCING OUR CARBON AND NOISE FOOTPRINT • NEW AIRCRAFT DELIVERIES AND ORDERS • (45 in 2017. 61 in 2018. 71 in 2019) • Quieter, More Fuel Efficient, Less Carbon Output • Additional Narrow-body Orders Possible: (A-320neo/B-737MAX/CS-500) DO YOU REALLY WANT TO TRAVEL TO NYC ON THIS: NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 7: Interactive Reports Demonstration MAY 17, 2017 Item 7: Interactive Reports Demonstration The report consolidates existing reports into four functional areas: At the March 2017 NOC meeting, the Committee directed • Operations Staff to begin producing a new MSP Monthly Operations • Complaints Summary Report. • Sound Monitoring • Noise Abatement

The new report is intended to give readers a summary of Expected Launch: these four areas in a brief and easily understood format • May Reporting Cycle – June 12, 2017

Much of the existing report data does not exist in this new report. To replace this data, the Noise Office built a full replacement application that combines data from the Reports on the Fly section and existing reports Item 7: Interactive Reports Demonstration

Requested Action APPROVE THE NEW WEBSITE INTERACTIVE REPORTING CAPABILITIES AND DIRECT STAFF TO DISCONTINUE THE PRODUCTION OF THE MONTHLY TECHNICAL ADVISOR’S REPORT, EAGAN-MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR REPORT, RUNWAY 17 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT, CROSSING-IN-THE-CORRIDOR ANALYSIS REPORT AND THE MSP RUNWAY USE SYSTEM REPORT. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 8: New Aircraft Noise Basics Videos MAY 17, 2017 NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 9: Review of January 25 and April 19 Listening MAY 17, 2017 Sessions

6 residents attended the Winter Listening Session. All questions were answered at the meeting, therefore staff did not prepare written responses. Comments/questions from the residents focused on:  Converging Runway Operations (CRO) and the increased frequency of arrivals on Runways 12L and 12R  Residential Noise Mitigation Program eligibility  Increase in flights during early morning hours  Area Navigation (RNAV) arrival procedures  New aircraft use at MSP to reduce noise from the source  Altitude of aircraft NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 9: Review of January 25 and April 19 Listening MAY 17, 2017 Sessions

19 residents attended the Spring Listening Session held in Eagan. Presentation slides from both Listening Sessions are available at http://www.macnoise.com/our-neighbors/msp-quarterly-listening- All questions were answered at the meeting, therefore staff did not sessions prepare written responses. The comments/questions from the residents focused on: At the end of each meeting, staff asked for feedback about the meeting format. Comments indicated:  Measures being taken by the FAA in an effort to return runway use • attendees appreciate the diverse mix of representatives from the MAC, levels back to pre-Converging Runway Operations levels FAA, the NOC and airlines and the willingness to openly discuss  Runway 17 departure frequency  Enacting penalties and/or disincentives for nighttime operations individual concerns.  Runway Use System (RUS) prioritization • Pleased with the restructured meeting format, which allowed for good  Airport capacity and operational forecasts dialogue and that they felt listened to  New aircraft to reduce noise at the source

The next Listening Session is July 26, 2017 at 7:00 PM in Apple Valley NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 10: Public Comment MAY 17, 2017 NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Item 11: Announcements MAY 17, 2017

Next NOC meeting July 19, 2017 @ 1:30 PM MAC General Offices 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450