The Non-Analog Vegetation of the Late Paleozoic Icehouse–Hothouse and Their Coal-Forming Forested Environments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Non-Analog Vegetation of the Late Paleozoic Icehouse–Hothouse and Their Coal-Forming Forested Environments 1 The Non-analog Vegetation of the Late 2 Paleozoic Icehouse–Hothouse and Their 12 3 Coal-Forming Forested Environments 4 Robert A. Gastaldo, Marion Bamford, John Calder, 5 William A. DiMichele, Roberto Iannuzzi, André Jasper, 6 Hans Kerp, Stephen McLoughlin, Stanislav Opluštil, 7 Hermann W. Pfefferkorn, Ronny Rößler, and Jun Wang 8 Abstract until the latest Pennsylvanian. Even the gymnosperm 22 9 A walk in the Carboniferous-and-Permian woods of the groups, which commonly grew in mineral-rich soils, are 23 10 Late Paleozoic, a time known as the Late Paleozoic Ice unfamiliar and subdominant components of these land- 24 11 Age (LPIA), would not be a walk in the woods comparable scapes. The extinct pteridosperms and cordaitaleans, and 25 12 to today’s Holocene forests. The vegetation that colonized the extant ginkgoalean, cycad, and conifer clades, ulti- 26 13 and inhabited the landscapes during glacial∗ and intergla- mately diversify and occupy better drained soil conditions 27 14 cial∗ episodes are non-analogs with the world we witness that developed in response to global climate change from 28 15 around us. Unlike continents covered in seed-bearing­ for- icehouse∗ to hothouse∗ conditions. Beginning in the latest 29 16 ests, the systematic affinities of the largest trees, and many Pennsylvanian and increasing their dominance in the 30 17 shrubs, groundcover, vines (lianas), and epiphytes lie with Permian, seed-producing clades expanded their biogeo- 31 18 the spore-producing ferns and fern allies. These ferns and graphic ranges, displacing the former fern and fern-ally 32 19 fern allies, including the club mosses (lycopsids) and giants. This change in diversity occurs during a unique 33 20 horsetails (sphenopsids), dominated both organic-rich interval in the history of Earth’s biosphere. 34 21 (peat) and mineral-substrate soils from the Mississippian The LPIA is the only time, other than the Neogene, 35 since the evolution and colonization of terrestrial plants, 36 when the planet experienced prolonged icehouse and 37 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this chapter greenhouse conditions. Extensive tropical peat swamps, 38 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35058-1_12) contains supplemen- tary material, which is available to authorized users. H. Kerp R. A. Gastaldo (*) Institute of Geology and Palaeontology – Palaeobotany, University Department of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA of Münster, Münster, Germany e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] M. Bamford S. McLoughlin Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural Johannesburg, South Africa History, Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] J. Calder S. Opluštil Geological Survey Division, Nova Scotia Department of Energy Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Charles University in and Mines, Halifax, NS, Canada Prague, Prague, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] W. A. DiMichele H. W. Pfefferkorn Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, United Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of States National Museum, Washington, DC, USA Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] R. Iannuzzi R. Rößler Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Museum für Naturkunde, Chemnitz, Germany Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] J. Wang A. Jasper Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy Universidade do Vale do Taquari - Univates, Lajeado, RS, Brazil of Sciences, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 E. Martinetto et al. (eds.), Nature through Time, Springer Textbooks in Earth Sciences, Geography and Environment, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35058-1_12 R. A. Gastaldo et al. 39 similar in physical properties to current analogs in plants–lycopsids, sphenopsids, ferns, and seed plants–were 86 40 Southeast Asia, accumulated in coastal plain lowlands. co-equal components of Carboniferous–Permian peat forests. 87 41 These forests extended over thousands of square kilome- Most of these plants reproduced exclusively by spores–the 88 42 ters during periods when global sea level was low in lycopsids, sphenopsids, ferns, and enigmatic progymno- 89 43 response to the development of extensive Gondwanan sperms–whereas the gymnosperms reproduced by seeds. 90 44 glaciation at the southern pole. When these ice sheets Many of the fossil taxa are unique to this time interval, but 91 45 melted and sea-level rose, the tropical coastal lowlands several subgroups in each broad clade persist to the present in 92 46 were inundated with marine waters and covered by near- similar ecological settings. The lycopsids were confined pri- 93 47 shore to offshore ocean sediments. The waxing and wan- marily to wetlands, the soils of which ranged from purely 94 48 ing of glacial ice was influenced by short- and long-term mineral to purely organic matter (peat) and constitute the 95 49 changes in global climate that were, in turn, controlled by majority of biomass contribution to the paleotropical peat 96 50 extraterrestrial orbital factors. As the LPIA came to a swamps (=Carboniferous and Permian coals). One taxon, 97 51 close, a new forested landscape appeared, more familiar Sigillaria, is known from sites in which the soil moisture con- 98 52 but, still, distant. ditions were better drained and, probably, seasonally dry 99 (DiMichele et al. 2005a). After the demise of tree lycopsids in 100 the Late Pennsylvanian of the paleotropics, representatives of 101 53 12.1 Introduction the clade occupied wetlands in the North and South China 102 Blocks, which persisted until the end of the Permian (see 103 54 The Industrial Revolution began in the middle of the eigh- Gastaldo et al., unit 13, this volume). Calamitean sphenopsids 104 55 teenth century and progressed rapidly after the invention of the are similar in gross structural organization to living 105 56 steam engine in 1776. The technological advances that marked Equisetales, except for the presence of secondary xylem 106 57 this time were powered by coal, which is the byproduct of peat (wood), which allowed them to grow to the size of trees. This 107 58 accumulation in extensive tropical wetland forests that cov- group occupied a narrow range of habitats, those of disturbed 108 59 ered equatorial region hundreds of millions of years ago in settings and floodplains where sedimentation built up land 109 60 what is often referred to as “Deep Time.” From the end of the surfaces. The clonal growth habit of some taxa permitted 110 61 eighteenth century to the middle of the twentieth century, as regeneration following burial in many instances (Gastaldo 111 62 exploitation of this natural resource expanded, coal-mining 1992). Several groups of ferns are known in the fossil record, 112 63 operations uncovered countless troves of fossilized plants rep- some of which are extant (see Pšenička et al., unit 11, this 113 64 resenting ancient forests. But, the plant groups comprising volume). The most conspicuous group is the marattialean 114 65 these forests were not the same as the angiosperms and gymo- ferns. Whereas modern members of this clade remain under- 115 66 sperms that have dominated the landscapes of the Paleogene story forms, some Paleozoic species grew to be trees during 116 67 or Neogene (Martinetto et al., units 1 and 2, this volume), or the LPIA. These plants, inexpensively constructed in terms of 117 68 even back in the Mesozoic (Gee et al., unit 6, this volume). carbon-biomass allocation, dominated tropical wetlands in 118 69 Rather, a hard look at them tells us that the systematic affini- the latest Carboniferous and were opportunistic taxa. In con- 119 70 ties of the largest trees, and many shrubs, groundcover, vines, trast, the progymnosperm group, which is a holdover from the 120 71 and epiphytes lie, mainly, with the spore-producing ferns and latest Devonian, is more prominent in Mississippian floras 121 72 fern allies. Imagine standing under a grove of trees, 30 m in with few recognized individuals in younger forests. These 122 73 height, where a broken canopy casts little shade, and the plants produced woody stems with conifer-like wood, some 123 74 release of spores turns the vista into a yellowish color. When of which grew to tall trees but reproduced all by spores. The 124 75 fossilized seeds were first discovered, these, too, had features progymnosperm group is a transitional mosaic to the true 125 76 very different from modern groups (Oliver and Scott 1903). seed-producing gymnosperms (see Gensel et al., unit 15, this 126 77 And, when seeds were found attached to their parental plants, volume). With the advent of seeds, true gymnospermous 127 78 it was recognized that these gymnosperms were also very dif- plants came to dominate terra ferma habitats but were also 128 79 ferent from modern forms, although several growth architec- widespread in wetlands. Several extinct groups are found in 129 80 tures look familiar (DiMichele et al. 2005a). the Permo–Carboniferous swamps including medullosan and 130 lyginopterid pteridosperms (seed ferns) in the wet tropics and 131 the cordaites, a sister group of the conifers, in both the wet 132 81 12.2 LPIA Tropical Forests: The Players and seasonally dry tropics and the north temperate zone. The 133 fossil record of the conifers and other gymnospermous groups 134 82 The coal forests of the Carboniferous were dominated by is less common in Carboniferous paleoequatorial forests and, 135 83 entirely different plant groups from those contributing most in general, found in the seasonally dry tropics.
Recommended publications
  • Fossils and Plant Phylogeny1
    American Journal of Botany 91(10): 1683±1699. 2004. FOSSILS AND PLANT PHYLOGENY1 PETER R. CRANE,2,5 PATRICK HERENDEEN,3 AND ELSE MARIE FRIIS4 2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK; 3Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052 USA; 4Department of Palaeobotany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, S-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Developing a detailed estimate of plant phylogeny is the key ®rst step toward a more sophisticated and particularized understanding of plant evolution. At many levels in the hierarchy of plant life, it will be impossible to develop an adequate understanding of plant phylogeny without taking into account the additional diversity provided by fossil plants. This is especially the case for relatively deep divergences among extant lineages that have a long evolutionary history and in which much of the relevant diversity has been lost by extinction. In such circumstances, attempts to integrate data and interpretations from extant and fossil plants stand the best chance of success. For this to be possible, what will be required is meticulous and thorough descriptions of fossil material, thoughtful and rigorous analysis of characters, and careful comparison of extant and fossil taxa, as a basis for determining their systematic relationships. Key words: angiosperms; fossils; paleobotany; phylogeny; spermatophytes; tracheophytes. Most biological processes, such as reproduction or growth distic context, neither fossils nor their stratigraphic position and development, can only be studied directly or manipulated have any special role in inferring phylogeny, and although experimentally using living organisms. Nevertheless, much of more complex models have been developed (see Fisher, 1994; what we have inferred about the large-scale processes of plant Huelsenbeck, 1994), these have not been widely adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Agora Paleobotanica Un Hommage À / a Tribute to Bernard Renault (1836-1904)
    Agora Paleobotanica Un hommage à / A tribute to Bernard Renault (1836-1904) 6-9/07/2015, Autun (France) Résumés - Abstracts Agora Paleobotanica Un hommage à / A tribute to Bernard Renault (1836-1904) 6-9/07/2015, Autun (France) Comité d’organisation / Organizing Committee Anais BOURA – Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris Jean BROUTIN – Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris Dominique CHABARD – Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle Jacques de La Comble, Autun Anne-Laure DECOMBEIX – CNRS-UMR AMAP, Montpellier Jean GALTIER – CNRS-UMR AMAP, Montpellier Georges GAND – Université de Bourgogne, Dijon Evelyne JONDOT– Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle Jacques de La Comble, Autun Brigitte MEYER-BERTHAUD – CNRS-UMR AMAP, Montpellier Progamme mis à jour le 29/06 Program updated on 29/06 Progamme mis à jour le 29/06 Program updated on 29/06 LUNDI/MONDAY Museum d’Histoire Naturelle Jacques de La Comble 14 rue Saint-Antoine, Autun. There is another access (backyard & garden) from Impasse Rollet. 16h00-17h30 Accueil des participants Participant arrival 17h30-18h Conférence introductive/ Opening talk Georges GAND. Le Bassin Permien d’Autun 18h-19h30 Allocution de bienvenue du maire - Apéritif de bienvenue Welcome address by the mayor - Welcome drinks Progamme mis à jour le 29/06 Program updated on 29/06 MARDI /TUESDAY Salon d’honneur de la mairie d’Autun/ City Hall Place du Champ de Mars. Session 1: PALEOZOÏQUE I Modérateurs/Chairs: Philippe GERRIENNE & Evelyn KUSTATSCHER 9h00-9h30 Jean GALTIER. Keynote: Bernard Renault (1836-1904), his life, works and paleobotanical heritage. 9h30-9h50 Christine STRULLU-DERRIEN & P. KENRICK. Palaeozoosporites renaultii, a new fungus in the rooting system of the Rhynie Chert plant Asteroxylon mackiei.
    [Show full text]
  • New Paleobotanical Data on the Portuguese Pennsylvanian (Douro Carboniferous Basin, NW Portugal)
    Versão online: http://www.lneg.pt/iedt/unidades/16/paginas/26/30/185 Comunicações Geológicas (2014) 101, Especial I, 409-414 IX CNG/2º CoGePLiP, Porto 2014 ISSN: 0873-948X; e-ISSN: 1647-581X New paleobotanical data on the Portuguese Pennsylvanian (Douro Carboniferous Basin, NW Portugal) Novos dados paleobotânicos do Pensilvaniano português (Bacia Carbonífera do Douro, NW Portugal) P. Correia1*, Z. Šimůnek2, J. Pšenička3, A. A. Sá4,5, R. Domingos6, A. Carneiro7, D. Flores1,7 Artigo Curto Short Article © 2014 LNEG – Laboratório Nacional de Geologia e Energia IP Abstract: This paper describes nine new macrofloral taxa from 1. Introduction Douro Carboniferous Basin (lower Gzhelian) of Portugal. The plant assemblage is mainly composed by pteridophylls (Sphenopteriss The fossil flora of Carboniferous of Portugal is still little arberi Kidston, Sphenopteris fayoli Zeiller, Sphenopteris tenuis known. The new megafloral occurrences recently found in Schenk, Odontopteris schlotheimii Brongniart), sphenopsids the Upper Pennsylvanian strata of Douro Carboniferous (Annularia spicata Gutbier, Stellotheca robusta (Feistmantel) Basin (DCB) provide new and important data about Surange and Prakash, Calamostachys grandis Zeiller (Jongmans) and Calamostachys calathifera Sterzel) besides the gymnosperm paleobotanical richness and diversity of the Paleozoic Cordaites foliolatus Grand`Eury. The new data provide a better floras of Portugal offering more information to previous understating of the knowledge of Late Carboniferous floras of researches reported from diverse localities and by different Portugal, showing the high plant diversity of Gzhelian floras, when authors (e.g. Wenceslau de Lima, Bernardino António considerable changes in paleogeography and climate dynamics are Gomes, Carlos Ribeiro, Carríngton da Costa, Carlos evidenced in Euramerican floristic assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • S1. List of Taxa Included in the Disparity Analysis and the Phylogenetic Alysis, with Main References
    S1. List of taxa included in the disparity analysis and the phylogenetic alysis, with main references. Taxa in bold are included in the phylogenetic analysis; taxa also indicated by * are included only in the phylogenetic analysis and not in the disparity analysis. Three unpublished arborescent taxa were included on the basis that they showed additional anatomical diversity. 1 Callixylon trunk from the Late Devonian of Marrocco showing large sclerotic nests in pith; 2 Axis from the late Tournaisian of Algeria, previously figured in Galtier (1988), and Galtier & Meyer-Berthaud (2006); 3 Trunk from the late Viséan of Australia. All these specimens and corresponding slides are currently kept in the Paleobotanical collections, Service des Collections, Université Montpellier II, France, under the specimen numbers 600/2/3, JC874 and YB1-2. Main reference Psilophyton* Banks et al., 1975 Aneurophytales Rellimia thomsonii Dannenhoffer & Bonamo, 2003; --- Dannenhoffer et al., 2007. Tetraxylopteris schmidtii Beck, 1957. Proteokalon petryi Scheckler & Banks, 1971. Triloboxylon arnoldii Stein & Beck, 1983. s m Archaeopteridales Callixylon brownii Hoskin & Cross, 1951. r e Callixylon erianum Arnold, 1930. p s o Callixylon huronensis Chitaley & Cai, 2001. n Callixylon newberry Arnold, 1931. m y g Callixylon trifilievii Lemoigne et al., 1983. o r Callixylon zalesskyi Arnold, 1930. P Callixylon sp. Meyer-Berthaud, unpublished data1. Eddya sullivanensis Beck, 1967. Protopityales Protopitys buchiana Scott, 1923; Galtier et al., 1998. P. scotica Walton, 1957. Protopitys sp. Decombeix et al., 2005. Elkinsiales Elkinsia polymorpha Serbet & Rothwell, 1992. Buteoxylales Buteoxylon gordonianum Barnard &Long, 1973; Matten et al., --- 1980. Triradioxylon primaevum Barnard & Long, 1975. Lyginopteridales Laceya hibernica May & Matten, 1983. Tristichia longii Galtier, 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTÉMATIQUE DES EMBRYOPHYTES Document Illustrant Plus Particulièrement Les Taxons Européens Version 4 Octobre 2007
    Université Pierre et Marie Curie (PARIS 6) Préparation à l’agrégation SVSTU, secteur B SYSTÉMATIQUE DES EMBRYOPHYTES Document illustrant plus particulièrement les taxons européens version 4 octobre 2007 Catherine Reeb, Préparation agrégation SVSTU, UPMC Jean-Yves Dubuisson, Laboratoire Paléobotanique et Paléoécologie, équipe Paléodiversité, systématique et évolution des Embryophytes, UPMC Dessin de couverture : extrait d’un traité botanique tibétain Pour Garance Remerciements: merci à Jean et Monique Duperon pour les clés de détermination des familles d’Angiospermes, à A.M pour la reproduction de couverture, à Michaël Manuel et Eric Queinnec pour la partie I de l’introduction. Egalement à tous les illustrateurs qui ont autorisé l’utilisation de leurs documents mis en ligne sur Internet : Françoise Gantet, Prof. I. Foissner, Association Endemia de Nouvelle Calédonie. 1 Table des matières Introduction 3 Les données essentielles pour l’agrégation . 5 I Systématique générale des Embryophytes 6 I.1 Caractères des Embryophytes . 6 I.2 La place des Embryophytes au sein de la lignée verte . 7 I.3 Le groupe frère des Embryophytes . 7 I.4 Relations au sein des Embryophytes :les points acquis aujourd’hui . 8 I.4.1 Marchantiophytes, Bryophytes, Anthocérotophytes à la base des Embryophytes . 8 I.4.2 Les Trachéophytes ou plantes vasculaires, un groupe monophylétique . 9 I.4.3 Les Spermatophytes ou plantes à ovules, un groupe monophylétique . 9 I.5 Quelques points encore en discussion . 11 I.5.1 Position et relations des trois clades basaux (Bryophytes, Marchantiophytes et Anthocérotophytes) 11 I.5.2 Relations au sein des Spermatophytes :l’hypothèse "Gnepine" . 13 II Les principaux clades d’Embryophytes 15 II.1 MARCHANTIOPHYTA:Les Marchantiophytes ou Hépatiques .
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2009 Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America Chad Eric Husby Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10022522 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Husby, Chad Eric, "Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America" (2009). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 200. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/200 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS OF EQUISETUM GIGANTEUM IN SOUTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Chad Eric Husby 2009 To: Dean Kenneth Furton choose the name of dean of your college/school College of Arts and Sciences choose the name of your college/school This dissertation, written by Chad Eric Husby, and entitled Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett _______________________________________ Jack B. Fisher _______________________________________ David W. Lee _______________________________________ Leonel Da Silveira Lobo O'Reilly Sternberg _______________________________________ Steven F. Oberbauer, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2009 The dissertation of Chad Eric Husby is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Tansley Review Evolution of Development of Vascular Cambia and Secondary Growth
    New Phytologist Review Tansley review Evolution of development of vascular cambia and secondary growth Author for correspondence: Rachel Spicer1 and Andrew Groover2 Andrew Groover 1The Rowland Institute at Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; 2Institute of Forest Genetics, Pacific Tel: +1 530 759 1738 Email: [email protected] Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Davis, CA, USA Received: 29 December 2009 Accepted: 14 February 2010 Contents Summary 577 V. Evolution of development approaches for the study 587 of secondary vascular growth I. Introduction 577 VI. Conclusions 589 II. Generalized function of vascular cambia and their 578 developmental and evolutionary origins Acknowledgements 589 III. Variation in secondary vascular growth in angiosperms 581 References 589 IV. Genes and mechanisms regulating secondary vascular 584 growth and their evolutionary origins Summary New Phytologist (2010) 186: 577–592 Secondary growth from vascular cambia results in radial, woody growth of stems. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03236.x The innovation of secondary vascular development during plant evolution allowed the production of novel plant forms ranging from massive forest trees to flexible, Key words: forest trees, genomics, Populus, woody lianas. We present examples of the extensive phylogenetic variation in sec- wood anatomy, wood formation. ondary vascular growth and discuss current knowledge of genes that regulate the development of vascular cambia and woody tissues. From these foundations, we propose strategies for genomics-based research in the evolution of development, which is a next logical step in the study of secondary growth. I. Introduction this pattern characterizes most extant forest trees, significant variation exists among taxa, ranging from extinct woody Secondary vascular growth provides a means of radially lycopods and horsetails with unifacial cambia (Cichan & thickening and strengthening plant axes initiated during Taylor, 1990; Willis & McElwain, 2002), to angiosperms primary, or apical growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Devonian Plant Fossils a Window Into the Past
    EPPC 2018 Sponsors Academic Partners PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Scientific Committee: Zhe-kun Zhou Angelica Feurdean Jenny McElwain, Chair Tao Su Walter Finsinger Fraser Mitchell Lutz Kunzmann Graciela Gil Romera Paddy Orr Lisa Boucher Lyudmila Shumilovskikh Geoffrey Clayton Elizabeth Wheeler Walter Finsinger Matthew Parkes Evelyn Kustatscher Eniko Magyari Colin Kelleher Niall W. Paterson Konstantinos Panagiotopoulos Benjamin Bomfleur Benjamin Dietre Convenors: Matthew Pound Fabienne Marret-Davies Marco Vecoli Ulrich Salzmann Havandanda Ombashi Charles Wellman Wolfram M. Kürschner Jiri Kvacek Reed Wicander Heather Pardoe Ruth Stockey Hartmut Jäger Christopher Cleal Dieter Uhl Ellen Stolle Jiri Kvacek Maria Barbacka José Bienvenido Diez Ferrer Borja Cascales-Miñana Hans Kerp Friðgeir Grímsson José B. Diez Patricia Ryberg Christa-Charlotte Hofmann Xin Wang Dimitrios Velitzelos Reinhard Zetter Charilaos Yiotis Peta Hayes Jean Nicolas Haas Joseph D. White Fraser Mitchell Benjamin Dietre Jennifer C. McElwain Jenny McElwain Marie-José Gaillard Paul Kenrick Furong Li Christine Strullu-Derrien Graphic and Website Design: Ralph Fyfe Chris Berry Peter Lang Irina Delusina Margaret E. Collinson Tiiu Koff Andrew C. Scott Linnean Society Award Selection Panel: Elena Severova Barry Lomax Wuu Kuang Soh Carla J. Harper Phillip Jardine Eamon haughey Michael Krings Daniela Festi Amanda Porter Gar Rothwell Keith Bennett Kamila Kwasniewska Cindy V. Looy William Fletcher Claire M. Belcher Alistair Seddon Conference Organization: Jonathan P. Wilson
    [Show full text]
  • The Fossil Flora and Age of the Wamsutta Red Beds (Middle
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 10:12 p.m. Atlantic Geology Journal of the Atlantic Geoscience Society Revue de la Société Géoscientifique de l'Atlantique The fossil flora and age of the Wamsutta red beds (Middle Pennsylvanian), Narragansett Basin, southeastern Massachusetts, USA and correlation with the Cumberland Group of the Maritime Provinces of Canada Paul C. Lyons and Robert G. Sproule Volume 54, 2018 Article abstract New collections of plant macrofossils provide a precise Middle Pennsylvanian URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1055420ar age for the lower Wamsutta Formation red beds of the Narragansett Basin, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4138/atlgeol.2018.011 southeastern Massachusetts, USA. The Wamsutta assemblage indicates strong correlation with the Cumberland Group of the Maritimes Provinces of Canada, See table of contents which was earlier considered to be of late Langsettian to early Duckmantian age. This correlation is supported by the presence in the Wamsutta Formation of the following plant-fossil species: Neuralethopteris schlehanii, Neuropteris Publisher(s) obliqua, Senftenbergia plumosa, Calamites suckowii, Annularia asteris, Annularia cf. microphylla,Asterophyllites charaeformis, Asterophyllites Atlantic Geoscience Society grandis, Asterophyllites lindleyanus, Sphenophyllum cuneifolium, and Sphenopteris valida. Moreover, the new fossil flora resembles the Middle ISSN Pennsylvanian florules of western Europe, such as the Laveineopteris loshii Subzone. The new flora is especially similar to those of the Iberian Peninsula, 0843-5561 (print) where there is a complete succession of Carboniferous macrofloral zones, and 1718-7885 (digital) this similarity confirms a late Langsettian or early Duckmantian age for the lower Wamsutta macroflora. The new collections of Wamsutta Formation Explore this journal plant fossils, along with a smaller existing collection, represent the oldest known macroflora in the Narragansett Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • System Klasyfikacji Organizmów
    1 SYSTEM KLASYFIKACJI ORGANIZMÓW Nie ma dziś ogólnie przyjętego systemu klasyfikacji organizmów. Nie udaje się osiągnąć zgodności nie tylko w odniesieniu do zakresów i rang poszczególnych taksonów, ale nawet co do zasad metodologicznych, na których klasyfikacja powinna być oparta. Zespołowe dzieła przeglądowe z reguły prezentują odmienne i wzajemnie sprzeczne podejścia poszczególnych autorów, bez nadziei na consensus. Nie ma więc mowy o skompilowaniu jednolitego schematu klasyfikacji z literatury i system przedstawiony poniżej nie daje nadziei na zaakceptowanie przez kogokolwiek poza kompilatorem. Przygotowany został w oparciu o kilka zasad (skądinąd bardzo kontrowersyjnych): (1) Identyfikowanie ga- tunków i ich klasyfikowanie w jednostki rodzajowe, rodzinowe czy rzędy jest zadaniem specjalistów i bez szcze- gółowych samodzielnych studiów nie można kwestionować wyników takich badań. (2) Podział świata żywego na królestwa, typy, gromady i rzędy jest natomiast domeną ewolucjonistów i dydaktyków. Powody, które posłużyły do wydzielenia jednostek powinny być jasno przedstawialne i zrozumiałe również dla niespecjalistów, albowiem (3) podstawowym zadaniem systematyki jest ułatwianie laikom i początkującym badaczom poruszanie się w obezwładniającej złożoności świata żywego. Wątpliwe jednak, by wystarczyło to do stworzenia zadowalającej klasyfikacji. W takiej sytuacji można jedynie przypomnieć, że lepszy ułomny system, niż żaden. Królestwo PROKARYOTA Chatton, 1938 DNA wyłącznie w postaci kolistej (genoforów), transkrypcja nie rozdzielona przestrzennie od translacji – rybosomy w tym samym przedzia- le komórki, co DNA. Oddział CYANOPHYTA Smith, 1938 (Myxophyta Cohn, 1875, Cyanobacteria Stanier, 1973) Stosunkowo duże komórki, dwuwarstwowa błona (Gram-ujemne), wewnętrzna warstwa mureinowa. Klasa CYANOPHYCEAE Sachs, 1874 Rząd Stigonematales Geitler, 1925; zigen – dziś Chlorofil a na pojedynczych tylakoidach. Nitkowate, rozgałęziające się, cytoplazmatyczne połączenia mię- Rząd Chroococcales Wettstein, 1924; 2,1 Ga – dziś dzy komórkami, miewają heterocysty.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Palaeobotany Fundamentals of Palaeobotany
    Fundamentals of Palaeobotany Fundamentals of Palaeobotany cuGU .叮 v FimditLU'φL-EjAA ρummmm 吋 eαymGfr 伊拉ddd仇側向iep M d、 況 O C O W Illustrations by the author uc削 ∞叩N Nn凹創 刊,叫MH h 咀 可 白 a aEE-- EEA First published in 1987 by Chapman αndHallLtd 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Published in the USA by Chα~pman and H all 29 West 35th Street: New Yo地 NY 10001 。 1987 S. V. M秒len Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1987 ISBN-13: 978-94-010-7916-7 e-ISBN-13: 978-94-009-3151-0 DO1: 10.1007/978-94-009-3151-0 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Mey凹, Sergei V. Fundamentals of palaeobotany. 1. Palaeobotany I. Title 11. Osnovy paleobotaniki. English 561 QE905 Library 01 Congress Catα loging in Publication Data Mey凹, Sergei Viktorovich. Fundamentals of palaeobotany. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Paleobotany. I. Title. QE904.AIM45 561 8ι13000 Contents Foreword page xi Introduction xvii Acknowledgements xx Abbreviations xxi 1. Preservation 抄'pes αnd techniques of study of fossil plants 1 2. Principles of typology and of nomenclature of fossil plants 5 Parataxa and eutaxa S Taxa and characters 8 Peculiarity of the taxonomy and nomenclature of fossil plants 11 The binary (dual) system of fossil plants 12 The reasons for the inflation of generic na,mes 13 The species problem in palaeobotany lS The polytypic concept of the species 17 Assemblage-genera and assemblage-species 17 The cladistic methods 18 3.
    [Show full text]
  • ISPH-PROGRAM-And-ABSTRACT-BOOK.Pdf
    - ISPH 2015 logo (front cover) designed by Jasmina Wiemann. The logo highlights several aspects well suited for the Bonn, 2015 meeting. The dwarf sauropod dinosaur, Europasaurus, stands in front of a histology-filled silhouette of the main dome of Poppelsdorf Palace, the main venue for ISPH 2015. This Late Jurassic sauropod is a fitting representative, as it was discovered in Lower Saxony, Germany, and its dwarf status was verified with histological investigations. - Cover, program and abstract book designed by Aurore Canoville and Jessica Mitchell. - Program and abstract book editors: Aurore Canoville, Jessica Mitchell, Koen Stein, Dorota Konietzko-Meier, Elzbieta Teschner, Anneke van Heteren, and P. Martin Sander. ISPH 2015 – Bonn, Germany ISPH 2015 – Bonn, Germany Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Symposium Organizers and Acknowledgements ...................................................... 4 Welcome Address ........................................................................................................ 5 Program ........................................................................................................................ 6 Main Events ........................................................................................................ 6 Venues ................................................................................................................ 8 Scientific Sessions / Oral Presentations ........................................................... 11 Scientific Sessions / List of Posters .................................................................
    [Show full text]