DOCSLIB.ORG

From the Prehistory of Upper Mesopotamia to the Bronze and Iron Age Societies of the Levant. Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Changes in Upper Mesopotamian societies from the Halaf to the Late Chalcolithic period. A comparative analysis of different Neolithic and Chalcolithic developmental models in the Near East MARCELLA FRANGIPANE Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità Abstract The paper tries to apply a developmental and comparative approach to the analysis of the processes bringing to the first hierarchical societies in Upper Mesopotamia by focusing on their Neolithic roots and analysing the structural similarities and differences with the contemporary societies in two other regions of the Near East: South Mesopotamia and Central Anatolia. This comparison is aimed at evidencing, on the one hand, similari- ties and differences with an area – South Mesopotamia– whose features differed widely in the sixth millennium BCE but with which the Upper Mesopotamian communities were closely related for millennia. On the other hand, the author examines the profound structural differences with Central Anatolian communities, where the subsistence strategies, environmental contexts, and the resulting economic, social, and political organiza- tion seem to have differed substantially from the Mesopotamian ones. Whereas the comparison with Cen- tral Anatolian developments therefore essentially focused attention on structural features and differences, the analysis of the relationship with Southern Mesopotamia also considered the nature and effects of the intensive “contacts” that linked together the two Mesopotamian regions and were relevant to the developments of both societies. Keywords Upper Mesopotamia, Southern Mesopotamia, Central Anatolia, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, local developments, cultural contact, socio-political changes West & East 3 Monografie, 2 marcella frangipane 1. Introductory Remarks and other relevant areas in the Near East, which can be traced back to specific and different envi- In order to face the question of the deep social and ronmental conditions, subsistence strategies, re- economic changes that took place in Upper Meso- lated social systems, and historically determined potamia in the fifth and fourth millennia BCE, it is phenomena. necessary to focus first on the characteristics of the societies that occupied this region in the course of a long time span, during the seventh and sixth millen- 1.1 Applying a comparative approach nia, preceding the rise of any hierarchy, in order to to highlight structural features of Upper highlight the roots of this crucial change. Mesopotamian societies Today, the increasing wealth of available ar- chaeological data has shown that models borrowed Bearing this in mind, this paper aims at identify- from anthropology and used to rank societies in a ing and better highlighting the peculiar features of succession of evolutionary steps often understate the socio-economic and political developments in the complexity of human history, reducing the im- the prehistory of Upper Mesopotamia by compar- pact of a number of variables and partly obscuring ing them with two other regions of the Near East. the diverse trajectories through which human so- This comparison is aimed at evidencing, on the one cieties have evolved in different natural and social hand, similarities and differences with Southern environments. The “formative” processes and their Mesopotamia, whose features differed widely in the outcomes are indeed exhibiting increasingly greater sixth millennium BCE but with which the Upper variety as more information is gathered on societies Mesopotamian communities were closely related of archaeological interest in which these processes for millennia, and, on the other hand, the profound took place for the first time. And the different his- structural differences with Central Anatolian com- torical conditions and events within which they oc- munities, where the subsistence strategies, environ- curred have had a substantial impact in determining mental contexts, and the resulting economic, social, the features of their emergence and the following and political organization seem to have differed sub- developmental processes. stantially from the Mesopotamian ones. Whereas The Near East provides a number of very inter- the comparison with Central Anatolia will there- esting cases with which to built up a comparative fore essentially focus attention on structural fea- analysis with the aim of shedding light on the main tures, the analysis of the similarities and differenc- trajectories and pathways leading to social change. es with Southern Mesopotamia will necessarily also On the one hand, a number of parallelisms and consider the nature and effects of the intensive re- close similarities between regional developments lationships that linked together the two Mesopota- in the wide Mesopotamian and peri-Mesopota- mian regions and were relevant to the developments mian world may have had their roots in the exten- of both societies. sive interaction network linking the communities The most significant aspects I shall consider when along the vast mountainous belt and hilly flanks of drawing comparisons between the involved Neolithic the “Fertile Crescent” during the long period of and Chalcolithic societies are the following: the “Neolithic revolution” and in the successive – The features of the domestic architecture (hous- intensive and continuous mutual relations con- es, equipment, space-use); necting the Southern and Northern Mesopota- – The presence or absence of public or communal mian communities in the sixth and fifth millennia buildings and their features (dimensions, monu- 1 BCE. On the other hand, substantial differences mental character, function); in the structure of societies and their developmen- – The overall layout of the settlements (agglutina- tal processes are observable between these regions tive, scattered, in blocks or neighbourhood com- plexes) and the use of free common spaces; 1 Carter, Philip (eds.) 2010. West & East 4 Monografie, 2 Changes in Upper Mesopotamian societies from the Halaf to the Late Chalcolithic period – The type and forms of food storage (domestic, 2.1 The premises in PPN villages collective, centralised); in the Taurus region – The management of staple goods (domestic, col- lective or centrally directed); The most symbolically important communal activ- – The symbolic or ideological expressions in funer- ity in PPNB contexts seems to have been the man- ary customs; agement of the sacred, which, judging by the impos- ing sanctuaries with their furnishings and the great – The evidence of territorial organisation, and the concentration of collective work needed to build extent of external relations; them, must have required some sort of central co- – The basic choices of subsistence economy. This ordination. The sanctuaries were transformed from aspect is unfortunately more difficult to com- being probably places of pilgrimage for several com- pare in detail due, in most cases, to the difficul- munities in PPNA (as is the case of Göbekli Tepe)3 ties of retrieving the necessary data to sufficient- to become sacred places linked to individual settle- ly understand the actual “economic role” played ments in PPNB, where a single sanctuary has been by each of the various subsistence activities per- documented in each village, but they always re- 2 formed by the communities. mained central places in one way or another around which the social life and presumably the religious life of the whole community revolved.4 These sanc- 2. Upper Mesopotamia and South-East tuaries certainly expressed a symbolic and ideologi- Anatolia in the seventh and sixth cal world that held these societies together5 and ena- millennia BC bled them to limit the potential conflicts in a period that showed a complex and very gradual transition There are clues which suggest that Upper Meso- from mobile hunter-gatherers to food-producing potamian and South-Eastern Anatolian socie- and more stable communities, in a very varied en- ties, each one in their own manner, may have vironment both in terms of topography and climate had a strong “community-based” form of govern- (from the Jezira plain and foothills to the Taurus ance, from the Pre-Pottery Neolithic onwards and mountains). And Göbekli was exactly located on an through the various and substantial changes that environmental border. occurred in these areas in the course of the seventh, In these PPNB villages, the houses, besides be- sixth, and fifth millennia BC. We must of course ing all very similar in shape and dimensions, as one distinguish between what has been observed in the would expect in what were essentially egalitarian so- earliest Pre-Pottery Neolithic and the later devel- cieties, were extremely standardized and the chang- opments of the Jezira societies, in particular those es in their form and layout in the course of time of the Hassuna and Halaf period. But I think that were applied to all the buildings in the same way 6 in both cases – PPNB and EPN –, albeit in a total- at the same time, indicating that the entire com- ly different way, the communities may have been munity uniformly complied with strict social rules managed on a cooperative basis: a close structural shared by everyone and evenly conformed to meet relationship between the domestic units may have new common needs. This behaviour is not motivat- resulted from the strong social and probably eco- ed by the agglutinated arrangement of the settle- nomic needs for cooperation, while there was a ments and the continuity in the individual family clear
Recommended publications

  • Architecture

    Architecture Gernot Wilhelm I Carlo Zaccagnini (Plates 111 - XVt, LXXXVI, 5 - XCIV) wall built of 4-5 layers of 6 mudbricks each (format: 20(?) x 14 x 11cm), laid on their long side, delimited the grave to­ LEVEL4 wards the south. Since the burial was mostly hidden under the balk between squares R 18 and S 18, the relevant part of the balk was carefully removed in order to clarify the (Plates VI, IX-XI, XII, LXXXVI, 5- LXXXVII) stratigraphical attribution of the tomb. As a result it became clear that the ash layer AF 99 (-352), which marks the transi­ The oldest artifacts found at Tell Karrana 3 are six Halaf tion from Level 4 to Level 3c, was not cut by a grave pit. A sherds (see Plate XXV, 183-186) which, however, come from pavement of flat stones (AF 123, upper Iimit: -340 to -345) much younger Ievels (see E. Rova in this volume, p. 51). The had been laid on this ash layer. On top of the pavement, the earliest traces of human presence emerged in the southeastem wall AF 2512 of Level 3c and a connected wall (AF 122), (squares S 17118) and R 18119) andin the westem (square Q running towards the east, had been erected. A floor (AF 130), 17) part of the mound. In squares SIR 17 a compact whitish which corresponds to the floor of Level 4, AF 62 = 107, was clay floor (AF 62 = 107, altitude: -382 to -388) was super­ found cut by the grave pit of Burial 13.
  • Download The

    Download The

    TOKENS Culture, Connections, Communities EDITED BY ANTONINO CRISÀ, MAIRI GKIKAKI and CLARE ROWAN ROYAL NUMISMATIC SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 57 LONDON 2019 © The authors Royal Numismatic Society Special Publication No. 57 ISBN 0 901405 35 3 All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopy- ing, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the authors. Typeset by New Leaf Design, Malton, Yorkshire Printed in Malta by Gutenberg Press Ltd, Tarxien, Malta CONTENTS 1 Introduction by ANTONINO CRISÀ, MAIRI GKIKAKI & CLARE ROWAN 1 2 The invention of tokens by DENISE SCHMANDT-BESSERAT 11 3 Some notes on Athenian bronze tokens and bronze coinage in the fifth and fourth centuries BC by KENNETH A. SHEEDY 19 4 Tokens inside and outside excavation contexts: seeking the origin. Examples of clay tokens from the collections of the Athens Numismatic Museum by STAMATOULA MAKRYPODI 27 5 The armour tokens from the Athenian Agora by MARTIN SCHÄFER 41 6 A rare clay token in context: a fortunate and recorded discovery from the necropolis of Tindari (Messina, 1896) by ANTONINO CRISÀ 63 7 Roman tesserae with numerals: some thoughts on iconography and purpose by ALEXA KÜTER 79 8 Lead token moulds from Rome and Ostia by CLARE ROWAN 95 9 Tokens of Antinous from the Roman province of Egypt by DENISE WILDING 111 10 Tokens in the Athenian Agora in the third century AD: Advertising prestige and civic identity in Roman Athens
  • ASCS Newsletter 2018.2

    ASCS Newsletter 2018.2

    The Australasian Society for Classical Studies Newsletter No. 43 December 2018 President Hon. Treasurer Hon. Secretary A/Prof. Tom Stevenson Prof. Bronwen Neil A/Prof. Gina Salapata School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Department of Ancient History School of Humanities Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Faculty of Arts Faculty of Arts University of Queensland Macquarie University Massey University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.ascs.org.au From the Editor This is a bumper holiday edition of the Newsletter, because it also includes the full publication list for 2017. The Executive decided that this remains a useful exercise, especially for advocacy for our disciplines. The wealth of scholarship the publications list and the University Reports below reveal is certainly impressive, and to all but confirmed troglodytes, like those recently revealed by the disgraceful government interference in the Australian Research Council grant process (see ASCS response below), should be clear evidence for the vitality of our fields. I know that collating this list puts considerable pressure on the Campus Representatives, and I thank them for their time and diligence. President’s Report Dear Everyone, It’s worth remembering sometimes that there are only 24 hours in a day. Yet somehow our members manage to contribute mightily to ASCS in addition to their day jobs. Well done to the organisers of AMPHORAE 2018 in Auckland and thanks too for all the work that is being done in preparation for ASCS 40 in Armidale next year. On that score the convenors, Bronwyn, Graeme, and Clemens, have already laid impressive groundwork.
  • Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia: an Environmental

    Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia: an Environmental

    Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia Professor V. M. Masson introducing school children from Ashgabat to the excavations at the Neolithic site of Jeitun, Turkmenistan, April 1990. David R. Harris Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia An Environmental-Archaeological Study with contributions from: Eleni Asouti, Amy Bogaard, Michael Charles, James Conolly, Jennifer Coolidge, Keith Dobney, Chris Gosden, Jen Heathcote, Deborah Jaques, Mary Larkum, Susan Limbrey, John Meadows, Nathan Schlanger, and Keith Wilkinson University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Philadelphia © 2010 University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Philadelphia, PA 19104-6324 Published for the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology by the University of Pennsylvania Press. All rights reserved. Published 2010. Production of this book was supported by a publication grant from the Academic Committee of the Iran Heritage Foundation (London) and an award from the Stein-Arnold Expedition Fund of the British Academy. The drawing on p. 304 of the head of a wild bezoar goat is from Harris 1962, Fig. 3a. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING -IN-PUBLICATION DATA Harris, David R. Origins of agriculture in western central Asia : an environmental-archaeological study / David R. Harris. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-934536-16-2 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-934536-16-4 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Agriculture—Turkmenistan—Origin. 2. Agriculture—Asia, Central—Origin. 3. Agriculture, Prehistoric—Turkmenistan. 4. Agriculture, Prehistoric—Asia, Central. 5. Excavations (Archaeology)— Turkmenistan. 6. Excavations (Archaeology)—Asia, Central. 7. Turkmenistan—Antiquities. 8. Asia, Central—Antiquities. I. Title. GN855.T85H37 2010 306.3’4909585--dc22 2010009780 This book was printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
  • Neolithic Period Is Accepted to Be One of the Most Important

    Neolithic Period Is Accepted to Be One of the Most Important

    SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DENİZ ERDEM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doç. Dr. D. Burcu Erciyas Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Numan Tuna (METU,SA) Prof. Dr. Asuman Türkmenoğlu (METU, ARME) Prof. Dr. Yılmaz S. Erdal (H.Ü. ANT.) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jan Bertram (METU, SA) Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Deniz Erdem Signature : iii ABSTRACT SOCIAL CONTEXT OF SMALL FIND DISTRIBUTION AT DOMUZTEPE; RITUAL DISPLAY AND SOCIETY Erdem, Deniz Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Assist Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman September 2013, 178 pages This study examines the spatial distribution of small finds within a late Neolithic ritual context at the site of Domuztepe-Kahramanmaraş (c.
  • AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY a Primary

    AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY a Primary

    54 RETHINKINGCERAMIC DEGENERATION: AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY Steven E. A primary researchconcern of archaeologists is the explanation of social change. Since archaeologists must deal with changeas itis mani- fested in the variability of material culture, itis not surprising that special attention has been givento studies of pottery, one of the most abundant forms of archaeological evidence,and onemost sensitive to tem- poral change. Unfortunately, interpretations of changingpottery reper- toires have usually failed to consider thesocioeconomic factors which also may be responsible for ceramic variation. This has been notably true when trends of change are judged to be Hdegenerative.htA study of ceramic change in the 'IJbaid and Uruk periods ofMesopotamia illustrates how can be correlated with the development of complex societies in the region. An Introduction to the Problem of Degeneration A heterodox approach to the explanation ofspecific Mesopotamian instances of supposed ceramic degenerationis-proposed in this paper for three fundamental reasons. First, traditional approaches all too often do not explain this form of change. At best they describe it and at worst, merely label it. Second, traditional approaches failto view changing material culture in light ofgreater economic frameworks which restrict behavior in all complex societies, includingour own. Third, traditional notions of degenerationare rarely explicitly defined, and tend to focus on examples of declining elegancein painted decoration to the exclusion of other aspects of ceramic change (cf.,Perkins 191+9:75). hDegeneration,hlas presently ill—defined, simply is not productive for the study of social change (cf., Lloyd 1978:45). Further,existing archaeological accounts of degenerationcommonly make the error of dealing with the resultsof change while overlooking the underlying basis of change: altered patterns of human behavior.
  • Tepe Gawra Yüksel ARSLANTAŞ*

    Tepe Gawra Yüksel ARSLANTAŞ*

    Fırat Üniversitesi Orta Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi Cilt: VIII, Sayı:2, Elazığ, 2013 1 KUZEY MEZOPOTAMYA’DA BİR KAVŞAK NOKTASI: TEPE GAWRA A Junction Point In Northern Mesopotamia: Tepe Gawra Yüksel ARSLANTAŞ* ÖZET Tepe Gawra, Eski Mezopotamya’da modern Musul şehrine 15 mil ve Khorsabad’a 2 mil uzaklıkta tarihi Niniveh kentinin yakınında eski bir yerleşim yeridir. Kazılmadan önce 120 m çapında ve 22 metre yüksekliğindeydi. Burada 1850’den önce Austen Layard tarafından bir keşif kazısı gerçekleştirilmiştir. Site sistemli olarak 1927, 1931 ve 1932 yıllarında Ephraim Avigdor Speiser başkanlığında Pennsylvania ve American Schools of Oriental Research’tan arkeologların katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tepe Gawra, Yukarı Dicle ve Zagroslar bölgesinden Mesopotamya’ya Lapis Lazuli ve diğer egzotik malların ulaştırıldığı bir ticari bağlantı noktasıdır. Bu ve diğer siteler Sümer ve Babil şehirlerinin de egzotik ürünleri temin ettiği yerlerdir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Tepe Gawra, Mezopotamya, Kazılar, Höyük. ABSTRACT Tepe Gawra is an ancient Mesopotamian settlement, near the ancient site of Nineveh, 2 miles from Khorsabad and 15 miles northeast of the modern city of Mosul. Tepe Gawra was 120 meters in diameter and 22 meters high. A brief exploratory dig was performed by Austen Layard before 1850. The site was formally excavated in 1927, 1931 and 1932 for a total of 8 months by archaeologists from a joint expedition of the University of Pennsylvania and the American Schools of Oriental Research, led by Ephraim Avigdor Speiser. Tepe Gawra was certainly a transport link in trade for lapis lazuli and for other exotic goods from the Zagros highlands and from the Upper Tigris basin into Mesopotamia proper. Sites like it supplied the heartland of Sumerian and Babylonian cities with exotic goods in antiquity.
  • Halaf Settlement in the Iraqi Kurdistan: the Shahrizor Survey Project

    Halaf Settlement in the Iraqi Kurdistan: the Shahrizor Survey Project

    The Archaeology of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and Adjacent Regions Access Open Edited by Konstantinos Kopanias and John MacGinnis Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology Copyright Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 393 9 ISBN 978 1 78491 394 6 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Access Cover illustration: Erbil Citadel, photo Jack Pascal Open All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Archaeopress Printed in England by Holywell Press, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Copyright Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Contents List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................iv Authors’ details ..................................................................................................................................... xii Preface ................................................................................................................................................. xvii Archaeological investigations on the Citadel of Erbil: Background, Framework and Results.............. 1 Dara Al Yaqoobi, Abdullah Khorsheed Khader, Sangar Mohammed, Saber Hassan Hussein, Mary Shepperson and John MacGinnis The site
  • NEWS RELEASE Pam Kosty, Public Relations Director 215.898.4045 Pkosty@Upenn.Edu

    NEWS RELEASE Pam Kosty, Public Relations Director 215.898.4045 [email protected]

    NEWS RELEASE Pam Kosty, Public Relations Director 215.898.4045 [email protected] EXPLORE AN ONGOING HUMAN STORY PENN MUSEUM’S NEW MIDDLE EAST GALLERIES OPEN APRIL 21, 2018 New exhibition is first in a planned series of Signature Galleries encompassing more than 44,000 square feet of reinstalled gallery space PHILADELPHIA, PA 2017— Founded in 1887, the Penn Museum sent the first United States archaeological expedition to the Middle East—to the ancient Mesopotamian site of Nippur in what was then the Ottoman Empire. More than 130 years and hundreds of international expeditions later, the Museum remains a world leader in Near Eastern archaeology, with a collection of more than 100,000 artifacts; a leading collection of cuneiform tablets bearing early literary, historical, and economic texts; strong Islamic period ethnographic and literary collections; and a rich archive of historic documents, field notes, and photographs—as well as ongoing research projects in the region. On April 21, 2018 (with a Gala Celebration on April 14), the Penn Museum taps into that collection and research expertise to open the new Middle East Galleries—a suite of galleries that invites the visitor to travel on a remarkable 10,000-year human journey, from life in the earliest villages and towns to increasingly complex cities. Nearly 1,200 objects from the Museum’s collections—including such world-renowned treasures as the crowning jewelry of a Sumerian queen from 4,500 years ago, the famed Ram-in-the- Thicket statuette, and the oldest known wine vessel in the world—will be on view. Large-scale video projections, made to scale models, illustrator’s renderings of scenes from the reconstructed past, smaller interactive stations, and touchable reproductions provide diverse avenues to explore the collections and the stories they tell.
  • Bilikum – Mysterious Jug Prolegomenon to the Problem of Three-Part Pots for Giving Toasts of Welcome

    Bilikum – Mysterious Jug Prolegomenon to the Problem of Three-Part Pots for Giving Toasts of Welcome

    Ivan Šestan UDK 392.72:738.8 Ethnographic Museum 738.8.045 Zagreb Review paper Croatia Received: February 17, 2009 [email protected] Accepted: February 26, 2009 Bilikum – Mysterious Jug Prolegomenon to the Problem of Three-Part Pots for Giving Toasts of Welcome The article provides a systematic overview of the questions on the shape and symbolism of a three-part pot - bilikum, which was used in Northwestern Croatia and Northeastern Slovenia as a pot from which wine was drunk in honor of the guests who were visiting a house for the first time. Even though any pot suitable for wine drinking could be used, only three-part bili- kum was used only for that purpose. That fact gives bilikum the character of a ritual pot, and logically raises questions on its possible link with the similar Bronze and Iron Age pots. Besides the symbolism of number three, which comes from its shape, the mystery surrounding the pot is enhanced by the legend of three brothers – Čeh, Leh and Meh, which is connected to it. Key words: bilikum, pots, giving toasts, symbolism of pot, ritual pot ilikum belongs to the rich inventory of multi-part pots Bwhose beginnings should apparently be sought for in different periods of the Bronze and Iron Age. Pots made up of several smaller pots which are connected were well known in archeology for their various shapes, how- ever, only a small number of them existed in the inventory of the so-called tradition- al culture. Moreover, the ones coming from traditional culture were usually made up of only two or three parts, while archeological pots could be composed out of ten or more parts (Picture 1).
  • English / French

    English / French

    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/INF.2 Paris, July/ juillet 2021 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE/ COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Extended forty-fourth session / Quarante-quatrième session élargie Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting / Fuzhou (Chine) / Réunion en ligne 16 - 31 July 2021 / 16 – 31 juillet 2021 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS This list is based on the information provided by participants themselves, however if you have any corrections, please send an email to: [email protected] Cette liste est établie avec des informations envoyées par les participants, si toutefois vous souhaitez proposer des corrections merci d’envoyer un email à : [email protected] States Members of the Committee / États membres du Comité ....................................... 7 Australia / Australie ............................................................................................................ 7 Bahrain / Bahreïn ............................................................................................................... 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina / Bosnie-Herzégovine ................................................................. 8 Brazil / Brésil ....................................................................................................................
  • The Textile Revolution. Research Into the Origin and Spread of Wool Production Between the Near East and Central Europe

    The Textile Revolution. Research Into the Origin and Spread of Wool Production Between the Near East and Central Europe

    Special Volume 6 (2016): Space and Knowledge. Topoi Research Group Articles, ed. by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, pp. 102–151. Cornelia Becker – Norbert Benecke – Ana Grabundˇzija – Hans- Christian Küchelmann – Susan Pollock – Wolfram Schier – Chiara Schoch – Ingo Schrakamp – Britta Schütt – Martin Schumacher The Textile Revolution. Research into the Origin and Spread of Wool Production between the Near East and Central Europe Edited by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, Excellence Cluster Topoi, Berlin eTopoi ISSN 2192-2608 http://journal.topoi.org Except where otherwise noted, content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 Cornelia Becker – Norbert Benecke – Ana Grabundˇzija – Hans-Christian Küchel- mann – Susan Pollock – Wolfram Schier – Chiara Schoch – Ingo Schrakamp – Britta Schütt – Martin Schumacher The Textile Revolution. Research into the Origin and Spread of Wool Production between the Near East and Central Europe The objective of the research group Textile Revolution is to contribute to research on the still largely unclear introduction of wool production in later Neolithic and Chalcolithic societies from Western Asia to Central Europe. Since direct evidence of wool depends on rare conditions of preservation,a multi-proxy approach based on different kinds of indirect evidence was chosen. The previous history of research on early wool production as well as the domestication history of sheep are reviewed briefly. Anthropogenic impacts on the landscape, possibly related to intensified grazing, are one kind of indirect evidence that we take into account. For the later part of the presumably long-lasting development of wool production, written sources are available, the earliest of which date to the Late Uruk and Jemdet Nasr periods (end of the 4th to beginning of the 3rd millennium BCE) in Mesopotamia.