AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY a Primary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY a Primary 54 RETHINKINGCERAMIC DEGENERATION: AN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN CASE STUDY Steven E. A primary researchconcern of archaeologists is the explanation of social change. Since archaeologists must deal with changeas itis mani- fested in the variability of material culture, itis not surprising that special attention has been givento studies of pottery, one of the most abundant forms of archaeological evidence,and onemost sensitive to tem- poral change. Unfortunately, interpretations of changingpottery reper- toires have usually failed to consider thesocioeconomic factors which also may be responsible for ceramic variation. This has been notably true when trends of change are judged to be Hdegenerative.htA study of ceramic change in the 'IJbaid and Uruk periods ofMesopotamia illustrates how can be correlated with the development of complex societies in the region. An Introduction to the Problem of Degeneration A heterodox approach to the explanation ofspecific Mesopotamian instances of supposed ceramic degenerationis-proposed in this paper for three fundamental reasons. First, traditional approaches all too often do not explain this form of change. At best they describe it and at worst, merely label it. Second, traditional approaches failto view changing material culture in light ofgreater economic frameworks which restrict behavior in all complex societies, includingour own. Third, traditional notions of degenerationare rarely explicitly defined, and tend to focus on examples of declining elegancein painted decoration to the exclusion of other aspects of ceramic change (cf.,Perkins 191+9:75). hDegeneration,hlas presently ill—defined, simply is not productive for the study of social change (cf., Lloyd 1978:45). Further,existing archaeological accounts of degenerationcommonly make the error of dealing with the resultsof change while overlooking the underlying basis of change: altered patterns of human behavior. An economic approach as adopted here,on the other hand, holds that one of the driving forces behind changingmaterial culture is the changing de- mands of society's economic conditions. From this point of view,apparent ceramic degeneration may bemore profitably explained by understanding why it became economically desirableto make less complex, less impressive forms of pottery, Thus, one means of understanding materialdegeneration is by way of the ancient potter's AMesopotamian Case Study ion of prehistoric and early historicsocial change in Mesopotamia most commonly has been derived fromthe character of major pottery sequences. As such, long-term "degenerative" trendshave attracted special archaeological attention and speculation. Such trends characterize Fa1coner 55 much of thepottery sequences through the'Ubaidand Uruk per!ods( ca. 5300-3600 B.C,;3600-3100 followingPorada1965; AdamsandNissen Thesesequences provide a settingin whichwe can review the shortcomingsof traditional descriptive interpretation and the pOSsible advantages ofan economically-based attemptatexplanation, Thisdiscussion will concentrateonthe 'Ubaid-Urukceramic se-a quences fromEridu in southernMesopotamiaandTepe Gawrain northern Mesopotamia. These sites wereselectedforseveralreasons,Use of data fromboth north andsouthmay helpcorrect forany geographical bias whichmight arise with theuseofdatatypicalof onlythe north or the south.Further, the vastamountofdescriptiye dataaval lable requi red, for purposes ofclan ty7that I concent rateonasmall, but hopefullyrepresentative,sample ofsignificant sites Mostimportantly, the Eriduand Gawra sequences have..beenthoroughlydescribedand discussed by authorssuch as Perkin s, Porada,OateS andOates,Lloyd,and Redman in their majortreatmentsofthe and Uruk periods. Finally, Eridu and Gawraprovide clearcont inuousportraits ofthe major tendencies of pottery development whichareusuallyclassifiedas"decadent" or "degeneratlye." Before considering thenature of specific'Ubaid and Uruk pottery ,oneshouldbefamiharwiththe larger chronologicalcontext of this scussion (see di Iable1)e The 'Ubaidand Uruk sequencesare known best from the Soundings doneat the southern Mesopotamiansiteof Eridu (Lloyd and Safar Safar 1950).The earliestIeveisexcava ted at Eridu are clearly 'Ubaid,though they contain decoratedpottery simi— lar to examples from NeolithiCsites(Hassuna, Samarra,Halafsites; see below) found farther forth. Subsequent to the publicationof the Eridu reports by Lloyd and Safar, Joan Oates revised the'Ubaid sequence into 'Ubaid phases I through Lj (Oates 1960; also see Table 2). TheUruk and Jamdat Nasr periodsin southernMesopotam i a In northern and centralMesopotami athe 'Ubaid and Uruk periods are preceded by a series of ceramic assemblages labeled "Hassuna," and "Halaf." The geographicaland chronologicaldIstinctionS among these later Neolithic assemblagesare problematic, butforour pur- poses here we can consider Hassuna to have commencedCa.6000B.C.and Halaf to have ended after5000B.C.(fo11ow!ng Porada1965:139ff,; Oates and Oates 1976:8; 1978;66). Notethat èlear 'Ubaid assemblagesdo not appear at northern Mesbpotamian siteS likeTepe Gawra until through the 'Ubaid period(see Table3).The Gawra excavationsare reported primarily in Spei ser Tobler (1950), 'Ubaid itsappearance innorthernMesopotamia as part of ap vast materiq) cuiture unity extending overthe Mesopotamian al luvfurn,westernIran(Goff 1971; Hamlin 1975;Hole, Elannery and Neely 1969; Hole 1977; LeBretoh 1957)and northern Arabia 1969; al-Masry 1973), It wasthefirstsuch "un in the prehistory ofsouthwes tern * Asiaq 'Ubaidce ramics show striking trendS of change,appear ingmost notablyafterthis unityhad beenachievedin'Ubaid 3, Intheassess— merits ofPerk! P Oates and orada Oates, Lloyd, andRedman fourtrends SeemSignificantatbothEndU and TepeCawra. They includetechnical change, Stanthirdizat ion,simp1 if ication , and large-scale distribution( see Tables 2and3). , . Table 1. Late Prehistoric Mesopotamian Chronologyas Seen at Eridu and Tepe Gawra YEARS B.C.(based SOUTHERNon Porado MESOPOTAMIA 1965: 139ff.;Oates and OatesNORTHERN 1976:8; AND Lloyd CENTRAL 1978:66) 0C'w•'l câ. 2900 CD 3100 EarlyLateJamdat Uruk Uruk Nasr(Eridu stratastratum V—i 1) i) (Gawra stratastrata MiddleLate Gawra Gawra 3600 1Ubaid L1 (Eridu strata VT HVI) (Gawra stratum XiJA—XlI) t) Early Gawra 1400000 'Ubaid 3 (Eridu strata (Gawra stratastrata XVi—xiv) XIX-XVij) 'Ubaid 314 148oo 2 (Eridu strata XIV—XH) (GawraHalaf/'Ubaid) stratum XX, mixed Transitionalid/Ha laf Ca. 60005300 1 (Eridu strata XIX-XV) Halaf/SamaHassuna rra/ a' Falconer 57 Table Southern 'Ubaid Pottery Trends as Seen in the Eridu Sequence (based on Perkins 1949; Oates 1960; and Porada 1965) TECHNICAL CHANGE rUbaid 1:E-ridu strata XIX-XV 1) I and Samarra pottery thought partly contemporary 2) Hassuna "milk jars" and "husking trays" in levels XVII and XV used to confirm this 3) Samarra decorative style shows greatest number of analogies to earliest Eridu pottery; designs so similar that they suggest a common origin (Oates 1960:42) 4) "Maltese square" designon plate floors reminiscent of Halaf 5) motifs "splashed on boldly and carelessly" compared to Halaf 6) fine quality monochrome paintedware is typical 'Ubaid 2: Eridu strata XIV—XII 1) wide bowls similar to late Halaf large plates; they retain some of the complexity of Halaf decoration 2) painting more careless 'Ubaid 4; Eridu strata VH—VI I) on the whole, "there seems to be a coarsening anda degradation of the art of pottery painting" (Perkins 1949:75) 2) at some sites in the south late 'Ubaid pottery painting became "quite careless and uninspired, and even at Eridu the later are less skillfully painted" (Oates 1960:39) 3) Lloyd calls late 'Ubaid vessels "decadent" (1978:45) STANDARD I ZAT ION beginning in 'Ubaid 1:Eridu strata XJX—XV... i) all 'Ubaid 1 forms continue through 'Ubaid 2, two-thirds into stratum XII, some to stratum VIII 2) various simple bowl types persist thoughout all the painted pottery levels 3) simple coarse buff ware occurs throughout the sequence 'Ubaid 4:Eridu strata VIl—VI 1) signs of tournette manufacture (anticipating Uruk period wheelmade pottery) 'Ubaid 4—Uruk: Eridu strata 1) appearance of light-co]ored wheelmade much coarser than 'Ubaid light ware 2) also red and bray wares (usually slipped; sheelmade) manufacture: a) smother kiln for dark fabric (reduction firing) b) use of slip as sole decoration (form of simplification too) Falconer 58 Table2(cont.) 'Ubaid 1:Eridustrata XIX-XV 1)paintedand unpainted coarse ware in additionto monochrome 2) "the decoration in generalis more intricate than the bold and free style generally associated with 'Ubaidpottery"(Oates 1960:36). 3) intricate geometric designs, tendingtoward rectilinear patterns 2: Eridu strata XIV-Xll 1)patternsoften clustered close together, creatingdark zones on light buff fabric 'Ubaid 3; Eridu strata Xf—VIU 1)decorationsimpler, less "busy" 2) simple, often bold curvilineardesigns 3) frequent use of negativespace (integration of unpainted back- ground into painted motifs;empty space is no longer dead space) 4) "lovely offering, bowlsof temples IX-VIHfarsurpass anything in the earlier levels for complexityand fineness of design and execution' (Oates 1960;36) 'Ubaid 4: Eridu strata Vil—VI 1) designs are bold and sweeping 2) use of slips isuncommon 3)large numbers of unpainted bowls fromburials LARGE—SCALE by 'Ubaid 3: Eridu strata Xl-VHI 1)rapid production "assured [pottery'sJ widespread north of Hesopotamia to Syria and iran" (Porada 1965:150) 2) extensive north-south Mesopotamiantrade links (e.g., between Eridu
Recommended publications
  • Download The
    TOKENS Culture, Connections, Communities EDITED BY ANTONINO CRISÀ, MAIRI GKIKAKI and CLARE ROWAN ROYAL NUMISMATIC SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 57 LONDON 2019 © The authors Royal Numismatic Society Special Publication No. 57 ISBN 0 901405 35 3 All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopy- ing, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the authors. Typeset by New Leaf Design, Malton, Yorkshire Printed in Malta by Gutenberg Press Ltd, Tarxien, Malta CONTENTS 1 Introduction by ANTONINO CRISÀ, MAIRI GKIKAKI & CLARE ROWAN 1 2 The invention of tokens by DENISE SCHMANDT-BESSERAT 11 3 Some notes on Athenian bronze tokens and bronze coinage in the fifth and fourth centuries BC by KENNETH A. SHEEDY 19 4 Tokens inside and outside excavation contexts: seeking the origin. Examples of clay tokens from the collections of the Athens Numismatic Museum by STAMATOULA MAKRYPODI 27 5 The armour tokens from the Athenian Agora by MARTIN SCHÄFER 41 6 A rare clay token in context: a fortunate and recorded discovery from the necropolis of Tindari (Messina, 1896) by ANTONINO CRISÀ 63 7 Roman tesserae with numerals: some thoughts on iconography and purpose by ALEXA KÜTER 79 8 Lead token moulds from Rome and Ostia by CLARE ROWAN 95 9 Tokens of Antinous from the Roman province of Egypt by DENISE WILDING 111 10 Tokens in the Athenian Agora in the third century AD: Advertising prestige and civic identity in Roman Athens
    [Show full text]
  • Hassuna Samarra Halaf
    arch 1600. archaeologies of the near east joukowsky institute for archaeology and the ancient world spring 2008 Emerging social complexities in Mesopotamia: the Chalcolithic in the Near East. February 20, 2008 Neolithic in the Near East: early sites of socialization “neolithic revolution”: domestication of wheat, barley, sheep, goat: early settled communities (ca 10,000 to 6000 BC) Mudding the world: Clay, mud and the technologies of everyday life in the prehistoric Near East • Pottery: associated with settled life: storage, serving, prestige pots, decorated and undecorated. • Figurines: objects of everyday, magical and cultic use. Ubiquitous for prehistoric societies especially. In clay and in stone. • Mud-brick as architectural material: Leads to more structured architectural constructions, perhaps more rectilinear spaces. • Tokens, hallow clay balls, tablets and early writing technologies: related to development o trade, tools of urban administration, increasing social complexity. • Architectural models: whose function is not quite obvious to us. Maybe apotropaic, maybe for sale purposes? “All objects of pottery… figments of potter’s will, fictions of his memory and imagination.” J. L. Myres 1923, quoted in Wengrow 1998: 783. What is culture in “culture history” (1920s-1960s) ? Archaeological culture = a bounded and binding ethnic/cultural unit within a defined geography and temporal/spatial “horizons”, uniformly and unambigously represented in the material culture, manifested by artifactual assemblage. pots=people? • “Do cultures actually
    [Show full text]
  • Tepe Gawra Yüksel ARSLANTAŞ*
    Fırat Üniversitesi Orta Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi Cilt: VIII, Sayı:2, Elazığ, 2013 1 KUZEY MEZOPOTAMYA’DA BİR KAVŞAK NOKTASI: TEPE GAWRA A Junction Point In Northern Mesopotamia: Tepe Gawra Yüksel ARSLANTAŞ* ÖZET Tepe Gawra, Eski Mezopotamya’da modern Musul şehrine 15 mil ve Khorsabad’a 2 mil uzaklıkta tarihi Niniveh kentinin yakınında eski bir yerleşim yeridir. Kazılmadan önce 120 m çapında ve 22 metre yüksekliğindeydi. Burada 1850’den önce Austen Layard tarafından bir keşif kazısı gerçekleştirilmiştir. Site sistemli olarak 1927, 1931 ve 1932 yıllarında Ephraim Avigdor Speiser başkanlığında Pennsylvania ve American Schools of Oriental Research’tan arkeologların katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tepe Gawra, Yukarı Dicle ve Zagroslar bölgesinden Mesopotamya’ya Lapis Lazuli ve diğer egzotik malların ulaştırıldığı bir ticari bağlantı noktasıdır. Bu ve diğer siteler Sümer ve Babil şehirlerinin de egzotik ürünleri temin ettiği yerlerdir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Tepe Gawra, Mezopotamya, Kazılar, Höyük. ABSTRACT Tepe Gawra is an ancient Mesopotamian settlement, near the ancient site of Nineveh, 2 miles from Khorsabad and 15 miles northeast of the modern city of Mosul. Tepe Gawra was 120 meters in diameter and 22 meters high. A brief exploratory dig was performed by Austen Layard before 1850. The site was formally excavated in 1927, 1931 and 1932 for a total of 8 months by archaeologists from a joint expedition of the University of Pennsylvania and the American Schools of Oriental Research, led by Ephraim Avigdor Speiser. Tepe Gawra was certainly a transport link in trade for lapis lazuli and for other exotic goods from the Zagros highlands and from the Upper Tigris basin into Mesopotamia proper. Sites like it supplied the heartland of Sumerian and Babylonian cities with exotic goods in antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • Halaf Settlement in the Iraqi Kurdistan: the Shahrizor Survey Project
    The Archaeology of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and Adjacent Regions Access Open Edited by Konstantinos Kopanias and John MacGinnis Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology Copyright Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 393 9 ISBN 978 1 78491 394 6 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Access Cover illustration: Erbil Citadel, photo Jack Pascal Open All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Archaeopress Printed in England by Holywell Press, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Copyright Archaeopress and the authors 2016 Contents List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................iv Authors’ details ..................................................................................................................................... xii Preface ................................................................................................................................................. xvii Archaeological investigations on the Citadel of Erbil: Background, Framework and Results.............. 1 Dara Al Yaqoobi, Abdullah Khorsheed Khader, Sangar Mohammed, Saber Hassan Hussein, Mary Shepperson and John MacGinnis The site
    [Show full text]
  • (Main Building) Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich
    11th ICAANE Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Hauptgebäude (main building) Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich Time 03.04.2018 8:30 onwards Registration (Hauptgebäude of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich) Welcome 10:00 - 10:45 Bernd Huber (President of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität/LMU Munich) Paolo Matthiae (Head of the International ICAANE Comittee) Adelheid Otto (Head of the Organizing Comittee) 10:45 - 11:15 Key note: Shaping the Living Space Ian Hodder 11:15 - 11:45 Coffee 11:45 - 12:15 Key note: Mobility in the Ancient Near East Roger Matthews 12:15 - 12:45 Key note: Images in Context Ursula Calmeyer-Seidl 12:45 - 14:00 Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 7 Section 7 Section 7 Images in Context Archaeology as Engendering Near Mobility in the Cultural Heritage Eastern Field reports Field reports Field reports Ancient Near Archaeology East I II III 14:00 - 14:30 Arkadiusz Vittoria Karen Sonik Cinzia Pappi and Jebrael Nokandeh Flemming Højlund Marciniak Dall'Armellina Minor and Marginal? Constanza and Mahdi Jahed The collapse of the Mobility of people Images of a new Model and Coppini Rescue Archaeology Dilmun Kingdom and and ideas in the Aristocracy. A koinè Transgressive Women From Ahazum to of Nay Tepe, Iran: the Sealand Dynasty Near East in the of symbols and in Mesopotamia's Idu: The Gorgan Plain second half of the cultural values in the Pictorial and Literary Archaeological seventh millennium Caucasus, Anatolia Arts Survey of Koi- BC. The Late and Aegean
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS RELEASE Pam Kosty, Public Relations Director 215.898.4045 [email protected]
    NEWS RELEASE Pam Kosty, Public Relations Director 215.898.4045 [email protected] EXPLORE AN ONGOING HUMAN STORY PENN MUSEUM’S NEW MIDDLE EAST GALLERIES OPEN APRIL 21, 2018 New exhibition is first in a planned series of Signature Galleries encompassing more than 44,000 square feet of reinstalled gallery space PHILADELPHIA, PA 2017— Founded in 1887, the Penn Museum sent the first United States archaeological expedition to the Middle East—to the ancient Mesopotamian site of Nippur in what was then the Ottoman Empire. More than 130 years and hundreds of international expeditions later, the Museum remains a world leader in Near Eastern archaeology, with a collection of more than 100,000 artifacts; a leading collection of cuneiform tablets bearing early literary, historical, and economic texts; strong Islamic period ethnographic and literary collections; and a rich archive of historic documents, field notes, and photographs—as well as ongoing research projects in the region. On April 21, 2018 (with a Gala Celebration on April 14), the Penn Museum taps into that collection and research expertise to open the new Middle East Galleries—a suite of galleries that invites the visitor to travel on a remarkable 10,000-year human journey, from life in the earliest villages and towns to increasingly complex cities. Nearly 1,200 objects from the Museum’s collections—including such world-renowned treasures as the crowning jewelry of a Sumerian queen from 4,500 years ago, the famed Ram-in-the- Thicket statuette, and the oldest known wine vessel in the world—will be on view. Large-scale video projections, made to scale models, illustrator’s renderings of scenes from the reconstructed past, smaller interactive stations, and touchable reproductions provide diverse avenues to explore the collections and the stories they tell.
    [Show full text]
  • American Journal of Archaeology the Journal of the Archaeological Institute of America
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA Volume 99 • No. 1 January 1995 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA 1994 OFFICERS JAMES RUSSELL, President STEPHEN L. DYSON, First Vice President KAREN D. VITELLI, Vice President for Professional Responsibilities ERNESTINE S. ELSTER, Vice President for Publications CYNTHIA JONES EISEMAN, Vice President for Societies FRANK J. WEZNIAK, Treasurer MARTHA SHARP JOUKOWSKY, Past President HONORARY PRESIDENTS STERLING Dow, JAMES B. PRITCHARD, FREDERICK R. MATSON, ROBERT H. DYSON, JR., MACHTELD J. MELLINK, JAMES R. WISEMAN GOVERNING BOARD PATRICIA R. ANAWALT CHARLES S. LA FOLLETTE JOHN H. BIGGS RICHARD WARREN LEVY BETSY Z. COHEN SUSAN E. LEVY GETZEL M. COHEN CLAIRE L. LYONS GEOFFREY CONRAD ANNA MARGUERITE McCANN NANCY T. DE GRUMMOND DANIEL MORLF.Y RAYMOND L. DEN ADEL ROBERT E. PENN HARRISON EITELJORG, II NANCY RAMAGE DANYALE ENGLISH SUSAN I. ROTROFF PATTY GERSTENBLITH JANE C. WALDBAUM IRA HAUPT, II NANCY C. WILKIE ELLEN HERSCHER ELIZABETH LYDING WILL JACK A. JOSEPHSON HECTOR WILLIAMS ARTEMIS A.W. JOUKOWSKY JAMES R. WISEMAN NORMA KERSHAW T. CUYLER YOUNG, JR. TRUSTEES EMERITI RICHARD BAKER BALDWIN MAULL RICHARD H. HOWLAND JOHN J. SLOCUM MARK J. MEISTER, Executive Director LEONARD V. QUIGLEY, General Counsel MEMBERSHIP IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA AND SUBSCRIPTION TO THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY The American journal of Archaeology is published by the Archaeological Institute of America in January, April,July, and October. Membership in the AIA, including a subscription loAJA, is $78 per year(C$104). Student membership is $37 (C$49); proof of full-time status required. A brochure outlining member- ship benefits is available upon request from the Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Near East
    A History of Knowledge Oldest Knowledge What the Jews knew What the Sumerians knew What the Christians knew What the Babylonians knew Tang & Sung China What the Hittites knew What the Japanese knew What the Persians knew What the Muslims knew What the Egyptians knew The Middle Ages What the Indians knew Ming & Manchu China What the Chinese knew The Renaissance What the Greeks knew The Industrial Age What the Phoenicians knew The Victorian Age What the Romans knew The Modern World What the Barbarians knew 1 What the NearEast knew Piero Scaruffi 2004 2 What the Near-East knew • Bibliography – Henry Hodges: Technology in the Ancient World (1970) – Arthur Cotterell: Penguin Encyclopedia of Ancient Civilizations (1980) – Michael Roaf: Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East (1990) – Hans Nissen: The Early History of the Ancient Near East (1988) – Annie Caubet: The Ancient Near East (1997) – Alberto Siliotti: The Dwellings of Eternity (2000) – Trevor Bryce: The kingdom of the Hittites (1998) – Bernard Lewis: Race and Slavery in the Middle East3 (1992) Ancient Civilizations • River valleys 4 Ancient Civilizations • River valleys – Water means: • drinks, • fishing/agriculture/livestock (food), • transportation • energy 5 The Ancient Near East 6 http://victorian.fortunecity.com/kensington/207/mideast.html Ancient Near East • The evolution of knowledge – End of the ice age – Climatic changes – Hunters follow game that moves to new areas (e.g., northern Europe) – Others turn to farming and hunting new game (cattle, sheep) – Technology (“what farmers
    [Show full text]
  • Tepe Gawra, Iraq Expedition Records 1021
    Tepe Gawra, Iraq expedition records 1021 Last updated on March 02, 2017. University of Pennsylvania, Penn Museum Archives July 2009 Tepe Gawra, Iraq expedition records Table of Contents Summary Information....................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information........................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................5 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 7 General Correspondence..........................................................................................................................7 Field Notes...............................................................................................................................................8 Indexes and Catalogues......................................................................................................................... 11 Publications...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020 – Pages 73-96 The Appearance of Bricks in Ancient Mesopotamia By Kadim Hasson Hnaihen Mesopotamia is a region in the Middle East, situated in a basin between two big rivers- the Tigris and the Euphrates. About 5,500 years ago, much earlier than in Egypt, ancient civilization began, one of the oldest in the world. Continuous development was an important factor of everyday life. A warm climate, fertile soil, mixed with the sediment of flowing rivers and perhaps even the first oak all. A deficit of stone for building shelter was an impediment that the Sumerians faced, but from this shortage they found the perfect solution for their construction-brick. Shelter, homes and other buildings were built from material available in the area, such as clay, cane, soil, mule. Sumerians mastered the art of civic construction perfectly. They raised great buildings, made of bricks (Ziggurats, temples, and palaces) richly decorated with sculptures and mosaics. In this article I will focus on the most interesting time period in my opinion- when brick appeared, I will comment upon the process of production and the types of the brick used in Mesopotamia. It should be noted that the form we know today has been shaped by the cultural and social influences of many peoples who have successively settled these lands, continuing to a large extent the cultural heritage of the former. Introduction The ancient population of Iraq (from the Stone Age, 150,000 BC to 8,000 BC) inhabiting Mesopotamia is one of the oldest civilizations to be discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Eridu, Dunnu, and Babel: a Study in Comparative Mythology
    ERIDU, DUNNU, AND BABEL: A STUDY IN COMPARATIVE MYTHOLOGY by PATRICK D. MILLER, JR. Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 This essay focuses on some themes in two quite different myths from ancient Mesopotamia, one known commonly as the Sumerian Deluge or Flood story, discovered at Nippur and published around the turn of the century by Poebel (I 9 I 4a and b ), the other published much more recently by Lambert and Walcot (1966) and dubbed by Jacobsen (1984) "The Harab Myth." The former myth was the subject of some attention at the time of its publication and extensive analysis by Poebel, par­ ticularly in King's Schweich Lectures (1918). As Jacobsen notes, it has not been the subject of much further work except for Kramer's transla­ tion (Pritchard, 1955, pp. 42-44) and Civil's translation and notes in Lambert and Millard (1969, pp. 138-147). More recently, Kramer has given a new translation of the text together with notes (Kramer, 1983). Both texts have now been the subject of major new treatments in the last three or four years by Jacobsen (1978 and 1984), and that is in a large sense the impetus for my turning to them. Indeed, I first became interested in the two texts when Jacobsen delivered a paper on them entitled "Two Mesopotamian Myths of Beginnings" at a symposium on mythology given at Sweetbriar College several years ago. His rationale for dealing with the two of them at that time was that each "in its own way stands apart and it seems to me, raises interesting questions of a more general nature-about composition, interpretation, and what hap­ pens when a myth is borrowed from one people to another" ( 1978, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Feasts and Daily Meals. Towards an Archaeology Of
    Between Feasts and Daily Meals Susan Pollock (ed.) BERLIN STUDIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD – together in a common physical and social setting – is a central element in people’s everyday lives. This makes com- mensality a particularly important theme within which to explore social relations, social reproduction and the working of politics whether in the present or the past. Archaeological attention has been focused primarily on feasting and other special commensal occasions to the neglect of daily commensality. This volume seeks to redress this imbalance by emphasizing the dynamic relation between feasts and quotidian meals and devoting explicit attention to the micro- politics of Alltag (“the everyday”) rather than solely to special occasions. Case studies drawing on archaeological ( material) as well as written sources range from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age in Western Asia and Greece, Formative to late pre-Columbian com munities in Andean South America, and modern Europe. berlin studies of 30 the ancient world berlin studies of the ancient world · 30 edited by topoi excellence cluster Between Feasts and Daily Meals towards an archaeology of commensal spaces edited by Susan Pollock Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. © 2015 Edition Topoi / Exzellenzcluster Topoi der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Cover image: Wall plaque with feasting scene, found in Nippur. Baghdad, Iraq Museum. Winfried Orthmann, Propyläen Kunstgeschichte Vol. 14: Der alte Orient. Berlin: Propyläen, 1975, Pl. 79b. Typographic concept and cover design: Stephan Fiedler Printed and distributed by PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin ISBN 978-3-9816751-0-8 URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsdocument0000000222142-2 First published 2015 Published under Creative Commons Licence CC BY-NC 3.0 DE.
    [Show full text]