Transportation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transportation SPRING 2015 ARIZONA TOWN HALL BACKGROUND REPORT TRANSPORTATION & ARIZONA EDITED BY MICHAEL KUBY AND AARON GOLUB SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES AND URBAN PLANNING ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY 106TH ARIZONA TOWN HALL RESEARCH COMMITTEE Warren Prostrollo, Chair Fred Rosenfeld Tara Jackson, Ex Officio Jay Kittle, Vice Chair Jim Rounds Joe La Rue Paul Brierley Chad Sampson Rita Maguire Arlan Colton Marty Shultz Elizabeth McNamee Esther Corbett David Snider Patrick McWhortor Kim Demarchi Julie Walker Ray Newton Darryl Dobras Marissa Walker Pat Norris Megan Dugan Devan Wastchak Will Novak Susan Goldsmith Larry Woods J. Scott Rhodes, Ex Officio Jim Holway ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report would not have been School of Life Sciences VisLab, as well improved during two meetings with the possible without contributions from as Karen Heard of Chalk Design, who Town Hall Research Committee, whose many dedicated people. First, we thank created the original design template for members shared patiently their extensive our two amazing research assistants, the Economy Town Hall report. We knowledge of transportation, Arizona Nazli Uludere Aragon and Meggan thank the SGSUP Director Elizabeth history and politics, and their Town Hall Dugan from the School of Geographical Wentz for her support, as well as Joann experience. Sciences and Urban Planning (SGSUP) Person for administering our accounts. Finally, we would like to thank two at Arizona State University. Michele Roy We thank Jonathan Koppell, Dean of different groups of contributors of of the SGSUP copyedited the report, the College of Public Programs, for content to the report. First, our thanks though any remaining errors are surely recruiting us and maintaining the strong go out to the chapter authors from our ours. Thanks also go to the dozens of relationship between Arizona State 2009 Town Hall report, who graciously students in our Transportation Systems University and the Arizona Town Hall, allowed us to build on that foundation Professional Seminar (PUP 591) for as well as Barbara Dodd and Andrea and helped us to update their original whom the 2009 Town Hall Report on Whitsett. insights. Second, we wish to thank all of Transportation was assigned reading and It was a pleasure working with the the new contributors of spotlight projects whose discussions inspired improvements team at the Arizona Town Hall, and other content for their expertise and made in this iteration. For the beautiful especially President Tara Jackson, whose the great work they have done. We have page layout of the report, we must thank enthusiasm and insight guided us from learned a great deal from all of you. Jacob Sahertian and James Baxter of the start to finish. The report was shaped and Design by ASU School of Life Sciences Visualization Lab | Chalk Design TRANSPORTATION & ARIZONA SPRING 2015 EDITED BY Michael Kuby and Aaron Golub School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning Arizona State University SPONSORS OF THE 106TH ARIZONA TOWN HALL PREMIER PARTNER COLLABORATOR PARTNER CIVIC LEADERS ONE EAST CAMELBACK RD., SUITE 530, PHOENIX, AZ 85012 602-252-9600 | WWW.AZTOWNHALL.ORG FROM THE AUTHORS We have had the distinct privilege of preparing two too high for some to afford, when streets are unsafe to background reports on transportation for Town walk, and when critical goods don’t reach their destination Hall participants—one in 2009 in the wake of an in time—there can be significant repercussions for the unprecedented economic crisis, and now again in 2015. people and businesses in our community, such as: Working on a second report has given us a unique • perspective on transportation in Arizona. Six years ago we Employment: when mobility is challenged by bad called attention to some potential changes that have since public transportation or unfordable transportation by come to pass—a drop in average miles driven per year, car, people are constrained in where they can live and denser urban development around the brand new light work, which forces them to settle for lower pay than rail stations, and electric and alternative-fuel vehicles they would if they were more mobile. finally reaching Arizona’s consumers. Other changes have • Health: People who live in areas where it is safe and surprised us, such as gasoline briefly under $2 per gallon, convenient to walk to nearby destinations are shown to a steady decline in deaths due to distracted driving, and be healthier than those who live in areas where the only serious exploration of a Phoenix-Tucson passenger rail reasonable option is to drive. line. • Economy: Congestion costs the average driver in the Unfortunately, there is also that third category—problems Phoenix metro area 35 hours per year, and 38 hours in that were getting worse and yet still haven’t been addressed. the Tucson area. Arizona remains one of the least safe states for driving and walking, it is ill-prepared for the mobility needs of • Environment: Emissions from vehicles causes significant our growing aging population, our rural and tribal areas pollution, which nationally causes billions of dollars in remain poorly served by public transportation, and we health costs, lost work productivity and early death. are only just beginning to plan for the impact of climate • Energy: Our reliance on gasoline and diesel cars makes change on the transportation system. Most importantly, us dependent on petroleum, leaving us vulnerable to the writing has been on the wall for quite some time swings in international oil prices; The National Bureau that our transportation financing model at the federal, of Economic Research credits oil price shocks for causing state, and local levels is unsustainable. In the 24 years six recessions in the United States economy since World since Arizona last raised its gas tax (and 21 since Congress War II.1 raised the federal gas tax), our ability to provide a good level of service and mobility options to all populations These are just a sampling of the important issues tied to across the state has been steadily eroded. our transportation systems. Improving our transportation systems can bring large benefits to our neighborhoods, our Ignoring these problems does not make them go away— children, our environment and our economy, and so we and they have serious economic, social, health, and hope the details in these pages can help you understand environmental consequences. When transportation the important issues to confront in moving our policies systems don’t work—when congestion, repairs, or and practices forward. flooding stalls movement, when transportation costs are Sincerely, Michael Kuby Aaron Golub Professor, School of Geographical Sciences Associate Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and Urban Planning; School of Sustainability Arizona State University Arizona State University 2 | TRANSPORTATION AND ARIZONA FROM THE CHAIRMAN We thank you for making the commitment to participate in the 106th Arizona Town Hall to be held at the Casino Del Sol Resort on April 19-22, 2015. You will be discussing and developing consensus with fellow Arizonans on the topic of Transportation In Arizona. An essential element to the success of these consensus- driven discussions is this background report that is provided to all participants before the Town Hall convenes. Arizona State University coordinated this detailed and informative background material and it provided a unique resource for a full understanding of the topic. Special thanks to ASU Professors Michael Kuby and Aaron Golub for spearheading this effort and marshaling many talented professionals to write individual sections. For sharing their wealth of knowledge and professional talents, our thanks go to the authors who contributed to the report. Our deepest gratitude also goes to Arizona State University President, Michael Crow; and Dean of the College of Public Programs, Jonathan Koppell, who made great efforts to ensure that the university could provide this type of resource to Arizona. The 106th Town Hall could not occur without the financial assistance of our generous Professional Partners, which (at the time of this printing) include Premier Partner APS; Collaborator Partner Union Pacific; and Civic Leaders Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. Law Offices and Cox Communications. When the 106th Town Hall ends, the background report will be combined with the recommendations from the Town Hall into a final report. This final report will be available to the public on the Town Hall’s website and will be widely distributed and promoted throughout Arizona. The Town Hall’s report of recommendations and background report will be used as a resource, a discussion guide and an action plan to support a thriving economy for all of Arizona’s diverse communities. Sincerely, J. Scott Rhodes Board Chair, Arizona Town Hall ARIZONA TOWN HALL, SPRING 2015 | 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . INSIDE COVER 4f. International Trade . 50 FROM THE AUTHORS . 2 4g. The Proposed I-11 Corridor . 52 FROM THE CHAIRMAN AUTHORS . 3 . Chapter 5. Transportation and Society . 56 TABLE OF CONTENTS . 4 . 5a. Communities . 56 Commuters . 56 List of Figures, Tables, Back to the Lecture Hall Boxes and Aging Arizonans. 57 By The Numbers. .6 Disabled Arizonans . 59 List of Acronyms Used in this Report . 8 Children . 60 Low-Income Families . 61 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . .10 . Rural Communities . 62 INTRODUCTION . 13 . Tribal Communities . 64 PART I—TRANSPORTATION FUNDAMENTALS . .15 . 5b. Public Safety. 64 Personal safety. 64 Chapter 1. Transportation Trends . 16 Transportation of hazardous materials . 67 Chapter 2. Modes . 22 Chapter 6. Transportation and Energy . 68 2a. Private Road Transport – Cars and Trucks . 23 Alternative-fuel and electric vehicles . 71 2b. Public Transportation . 24 Chapter 7. Transportation and the Environment . 76 2c. Non-motorized travel . 27 7a. Air Quality and Air Pollution . 76 2d. Freight Rail . 29 Transportation Planning Requirements for Air Quality Conformity . 78 2e. Long-Distance Passenger Rail . 30 Air Pollution on Tribal Lands . 79 2f. Air . 31 Air Pollution from Freight Transportation .
Recommended publications
  • Interstate 11 Update
    Management Comm ittee Maricopa Association of Governments June 9, 2010 Interstate 11 Update © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 1 Bordering States COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS TiTourism and RRtiecreation . GEORGE:ST . GEORGE:ST Scottsdale of Utah? California California Las Las Navajjj o Nation relates Population: Population:Vegas Vegas Grand Canyon more to New Mexico TOURISM TOURISM 60 M60 M by 2050!by 2050! 1717 II --1717 2525 High-tech High -tech Bedroom Bedroom Extension? Extension? communitycommunity community community industry along II --2525 People People Businesses Businesses Eager/ Springerville Second homes provide shopping/ services to Western New ECONOMIC DE Tourists Tourists Mexico Mexico Commercial Vehicles agriculture agriculture V Mexico’s fastest ELOPMENT growing states are in the north (Sonora, Chihuahua, and Nuevo Leon) Leon) Keyyy CONNECTIONS to Guaymas, Hermosillo, Punta Colonet maquiladoras Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 2 Arizona Arizona COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS .. Commercial Trucking .. Distribution throughout Southwest USA R e c r e a t i o n .. Elevation in Central Arizona (SR(SR--89/SR89/SR--69)69) Pearce Pearce Growth Growth .. USUS--95/SR95/SR--95 Corridor95 Corridor Ferry Ferry Limitations CANAMEX.. CANAMEX .. Natural Resources .. Copper in Safford Area InIn-- .. Emerging Industries rn rn EX?EX? migggration eeee .. Welton Oil Refinery MMMM Warehousing.. Warehousing WestWest CANACANA .. Sun Corridor Megaregion Population Prescott.. Prescott will double Copppper pp mining mining Phoenix.. Phoenix Tucson.. Tucson Agrarian Agrarian Industrial Industrial .. Recreation and Tourism Incoming Incoming Informal Truck Bypasses Commerce! Warehousing/Distribution Hub Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 3 2006 Tonnage of TrailerTrailer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar and ContainerContainer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar Intermodal Moves Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Une Étape 100 % Périgourdine Pour Le Tour Du Limousin – Périgord - Nouvelle- Aquitaine Mercredi 18 Août
    LE DÉPARTEMENT DE LA DORDOGNE COMMUNIQUÉ Une étape 100 % périgourdine pour le Tour du Limousin – Périgord - Nouvelle- Aquitaine mercredi 18 août 1 DOCUMENT - Publié le 06 août 2021 Le département de la Dordogne sera une nouvelle fois le théâtre d’une étape du Tour du Limousin – Périgord - Nouvelle-Aquitaine, dont la 54e édition reliera Isle à Limoges, en passant par les routes de Haute-Vienne, Creuse, Dordogne et Corrèze, du 17 au 20 août. Programmée le mercredi 18 août, cette étape 100 % périgourdine, longue de 172 km, reliera Agonac à Payzac. 20210810_CP_Tour_du_Limousin.pdf (.pdf, 98,3 Ko) TÉLÉCHARGER En accueillant de nouveau une étape du Tour du Limousin – Périgord - Nouvelle-Aquitaine, la Dordogne, dont la diversité de la géographie offre un terrain de jeu propice à la discipline, confirme son attachement au cyclisme. L’étape périgourdine, la seconde de cette édition du Tour du Limousin – Périgord - Nouvelle- Aquitaine, partira d’Agonac le mercredi 18 août. Au terme de 172 km, l’arrivée sera jugée à Payzac. L’étape, dont le départ sera donné à 12h35 (fictif), fera d’abord un périple autour de Périgueux, en passant par Trélissac et Excideuil, avant de passer une première fois sur la ligne d’arrivée à Payzac et d’entamer une boucle finale de 75,2 kilomètres. L’arrivée sera jugée vers 16h30 rue de la Croix Blanche, à l’extrémité d’une ligne droite finale de 800 m en faux plat montant. Trois ascensions sont au programme : la côte du Moulin du Pont (2 km à 6,60 %), la côte de Pervendoux (2,8 km à 6,15 %) et la côte de Charoncle (1,2 km à 7,67 %), placées respectivement à 86, 29 et 22 kilomètres de l’arrivée.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Boondoggles 6 Big Projects
    HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. WRITTEN BY: GIDEON WEISSMAN AND BRYN HUXLEY-REICHER FRONTIER GROUP MATTHEW CASALE AND JOHN STOUT U.S. PIRG EDUCATION FUND DECEMBER 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Kevin Brubaker of Environmental Law & Policy Center, Clint Richmond of Massachusetts Sierra Club, Chris DeScherer and Sarah Stokes of Southern En- vironmental Law Center, Wendy Landman of WalkBoston, Jenna Stevens of Environment Florida, Ben Hellerstein of Environment Massachusetts, Abe Scarr of Illinois PIRG and Bay Scoggin of TexPIRG for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Frontier Group interns Christiane Paulhus and Hannah Scholl, and Susan Rakov, Tony Dutzik, David Lippeatt and Adrian Pforzheimer of Frontier Group for editorial support. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. Policy recommendations are those of NCPIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Project maps included in this report should be considered approximations based on publicly avail- able information and not used for planning purposes. 2020 NCPIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursu- ing their own narrow agendas, NCPIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Procedure for Uci Calendars 2020 / 2020-2021
    REGISTRATION PROCEDURE FOR UCI CALENDARS 2020 / 2020-2021 UPDATE APRIL 2019 REGISTRATION PROCEDURE FOR UCI CALENDARS INTERACTIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS You can click on the different chapters to navigate through the document. INTRODUCTION GENERALITIES CONCERNING ALL DISCIPLINES 7 THE REGISTRATION PROCEDURES FOR UCI CALENDARS: STEP BY STEP 7 TO THE NATIONAL FEDERATIONS 9 RECAP DIAGRAM ALL DISCIPLINES 10 GENERALITIES CONCERNING ALL DISCIPLINES 10 WHO DOES IT CONCERN? 10 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE? 11 HOW DOES IT WORK 12 HOW TO FILL IN THE REGISTRATION FORM 12 THE ORGANISER 14 THE NATIONAL FEDERATION 15 WHAT ARE THE COSTS? 16 OTHER ITEMS 16 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS 17 CONTINENTAL CHAMPIONSHIPS 17 DATE CHANGES 17 CLASSIFICATIONS AND CUPS 17 FORBIDDEN RACES SPECIFICITIES DISCIPLINE BY DISCIPLINE ROAD 19 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL ROAD CALENDARS 20 HOW MUCH DOES IT COST FOR ROAD? 20 ROAD REGISTRATION FORMS 21 UCI WORLDTOUR CALENDAR 21 UCI EUROPE TOUR CALENDAR 22 UCI AFRICA TOUR CALENDAR 22 UCI AMERICA TOUR CALENDAR 22 UCI ASIA TOUR CALENDAR 22 UCI OCEANIA TOUR CALENDAR 22 UCI WOMEN’S WORLDTOUR CALENDAR 22 WOMEN ELITE CALENDAR 22 JUNIOR CALENDARS 23 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR UCI UNDER 23,JUNIOR NATIONS’ CUPS AND WOMEN’S JUNIOR NATIONS’ CUP 23 ORGANISERS’ MAIN OBLIGATIONS 24 CALENDAR 24 ORGANISERS’ RIGHTS 24 IDENTITY OF THE EVENT 24 SEMINAR FOR ORGANISERS 25 SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE UCI 25 AWARDING PROCEDURE 25 UCI UNDER 23 NATIONS’ CUP, UCI JUNIOR NATIONS’ CUP AND UCI WOMEN’S JUNIOR NATIONS’ CUP 26 OTHER EVENTS 26 ROAD CONTINENTAL CHAMPIONSHIPS
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA AMRP FY 2020 Enacted.Pdf
    United States Department of Transportation FY 2020 Annual Modal Research Plans Federal Highway Administration May 1, 2019 Nicole Nason Administrator Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1: Introduction/Agency‐Wide Research Approach ................................................................ 8 Chapter 2. High Priority Project Descriptions ........................................................................................ 16 Chapter 3 ‐ FY 2020 Program Descriptions ............................................................................................. 34 Chapter 4 – FY 2021 Program Descriptions .......................................................................................... 250 FHWA FY2020‐FY2021 AMRP– March 2019 Page 1 Executive Summary The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) addresses current issues and emerging challenges, creates efficiencies in the highway and transportation sector, and provides information to support policy decisions through its Research and Technology (R&T) programs. FHWA conducts advanced and applied research; coordinates and collaborates with other research organizations, both nationally and internationally, to leverage knowledge; and develops and delivers solutions to address highway transportation needs. FHWA is uniquely positioned to identify and address highway issues of national significance and build effective partnerships that leverage and
    [Show full text]
  • Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor
    Alternative Interstate 11 Corridor From Wickenburg to Mexico Border Prepared by: Sanjeev Ramchandra, M.Ed. [email protected] June 2016 Updated: December 2017 Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor To Las Vegas • I-11 still replaces the existing US 93 corridor but a new corridor south of Wickenburg is proposed. • I-11 corridor uses existing highway contours with no urban sprawl and no new desert destruction. • I-11 provides quicker and safer travel to Lukeville border crossing and subsequently to Rocky Point. • I-11 between I-10 and I-8 becomes a southern bypass around Phoenix for I-10 through traffic. • I-11 is an alternate to I-19 for some truck traffic and reduces congestion from Nogales to Tucson. • I-11 generates additional sales tax revenues from To Rocky Point vacationers for state and local governments in AZ. Phoenix West Valley I-11 Corridor (see map) 1) I-11 shares US 60 from Wickenburg to L303. 2) I-11 replaces Loop 303 from US 60 to SR 30. 3) I-11 replaces SR 30 from Loop 303 to SR 85. 1 4) I-11 replaces SR 85 from SR 30 to Gila Bend. 5) I-111 replaces SR 30 from Loop 303 to L202. 6) I-311 replaces Loop 303 from US 60 to I-17. 7) SR 85 freeway segment links I-10 and I-11. 6 A) DO NOT put I-11 west of White Tank Mtns. B) DO NOT extend Loop 303 south of SR 30. C) DO NOT convert SR 74 into a freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 24 December 2015
    Press Release 24 December 2015 Launch of a new UCI World Ranking The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) is pleased to announce the launch of a new UCI World Ranking (for men’s professional road cycling, reflecting a similar ranking in place already for women’s professional road cycling). The UCI World Ranking – individual and nations – will be published in parallel with the UCI WorldTour Ranking (individual, teams and nations). The new UCI World Ranking will be published once a week, each Monday, from January 11th 2016. It will take into account the results of the 52 previous weeks (a rolling system, similar to that of the ATP in tennis). This means it will only come fully into effect one year after its introduction. Its calculation will not be based on a specific series, as is the case with the UCI WorldTour Ranking, but on the entire UCI International Road Calendar (UCI WorldTour, UCI Continental Circuits, UCI World Championships, National and Continental Championships, Olympic Games and Continental Games). All riders who mark points in the races concerned will be part of the UCI World Ranking, including riders who are not members of UCI WorldTeams. The new UCI World Ranking was the subject of a thorough consultation process which took into account the interests and wishes of riders, teams, organisers and National Federations as well as media and fans. In addition, it reflects the most recent discussions of the UCI Road Commission and Professional Cycling Council. These modifications will not affect the UCI Continental Rankings, which will remain just as important on the continents and will continue to be calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • ROAD RACES Version on 10.06.2021
    UCI CYCLING REGULATIONS PART 2 ROAD RACES Version on 10.06.2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preamble ................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter I CALENDAR AND PARTICIPATION........................................................ 3 Chapter II GENERAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................10 § 1 Participation ........................................................................................................ 10 § 2 Organisation ....................................................................................................... 14 § 3 Race procedure .................................................................................................. 19 § 4 Circulation during the race .................................................................................. 24 § 5 Press specifications (N) ...................................................................................... 25 § 6 Guides, Guidelines and Terms of reference for organisers ................................. 33 § 7 Technical delegate .............................................................................................. 33 § 8 Team managers’ meeting ................................................................................... 34 Chapter III ONE-DAY RACES ..................................................................................35 Chapter IV INDIVIDUAL TIME TRIALS ....................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Uci World Teams Continentales Professionnelles
    LES EQUIPES UCI WORLD TEAMS CONTINENTALES PROFESSIONNELLES COFIDIS DELKO MARSEILLE TOTAL EUSKADI BASQUE ARKEA SAMSIC SOLUTIONS CREDITS PROVENCE KTM DIRECT ENERGIE COUNTRY MURIAS VITAL CONCEPT WANTY GOBERT RALLY UHC ROOMPOT - CHARLES B&B HOTELS WALLONIE BRUXELLES CYCLING TEAM CYCLING CONTINENTALES NATURA4EVER St MICHEL EVO PRO RACING ROUBAIX LILLE METROPOLE AUBER 93 TARTELETTO ISOREX AMATEURS EQUIPE DE FRANCE U23 2 La création. Le grand prix cycliste d’Isbergues est créé en 1945, par le secrétaire général de la mairie avec l’aide de quelques commerçants pour donner une animation supplémentaire à l’occasion du raccroc de la ducasse du Pont-à-Balques. Devant le succès populaire rencontré, il est décidé de l’organiser tous les ans le 2e lundi de septembre jusqu’en 1954, où il prend sa place définitive au calendrier le 38e dimanche de l’année. Il devient officiel en 1947 avec l’appui technique du Vélo Club de Lillers, club affilié à la FFC, puis de l’US Saint-Omer en 1948 et 1949. 1950 marque un virage important : le Club Cycliste Isbergues Molinghem est créé quelques mois plus tôt, et devient l’organisateur jusqu’en 1988 où l’Association pour l’Organisation du GPI voit le jour et prend la relève. Appelé Grand Prix des commercants du Pont-à-Balques les 2 premières années, puis successivement Grand Prix de la ville d’Isbergues, Grand Prix cycliste international d’Isbergues, il devient en 2006 le Grand Prix international d’Isbergues-Pas•de•Calais. Les premières éditions sont disputées par des coureurs amateurs et indépendants. En 1949, placé sous l’égide de la FFC, il est ouvert à toutes les catégories en individuel y compris professionnelles.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Road Race ROAD RACES the First Road Event in Olympic History Took Place in 1896 at the First Games of the Modern Era in Athens
    UCI CYCLING REGULATIONS ROAD RACES The first road event in Olympic history took place in 1896 at the first Games of the modern era in Athens. Olympic cycling was added to the women’s programme in Los Angeles in 1984, with an individual road event. Later, in 1996, the individual time trial was included in women’s Olympic cycling. 1. INDIVIDUAL TIME TRIALS Distances The distances shall be the following: Maximum distance Category World championships and Men Elite 40 -50 km Under 23 30-40 km Junior 20-30 km Women Elite 20-30 km Junior 10-15 km Course The course shall be safe and perfectly signposted.From the start of the race, the circuit may be used only by the riders in the race and the vehicles following such riders. The distances remaining to be ridden shall be indicated clearly every 5 km at least. For uphill races, each kilometer shall be indicated.(N) The organiser shall provide a warm-up circuit of at least 800 metresin the vicinity of the start. Starting order The starting order shall be determined by the organiser of the event in accordance with objective criteria that are to be resumed in the programme - technical guide of the race.Riders shall set off at identical intervals. Nevertheless this interval may be increased between riders starting last. The starting order of time trial stages during stage races shall be governed by article 2.6.023. Start All riders must present themselves for checks on their bicycles no later than 15 minutes before their start time.Before the start, an additional check can be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Libro Para Descargar
    1 2 SERIE SOCIOLOGÍA POLÍTICA DEL DEPORTE, DESDE AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE. VOLUMEN UNO DEPORTE, PODER, GLOBALIZACIÓN Y SOCIOLOGÍA POLÍTICA ELOY ALTUVE MEJÍA CENTRO EXPERIMENTAL DE ESTUDIOS LATINOAMERICANOS “DR. GASTÓN PARRA LUZARDO”. UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. MARACAIBO-VENEZUELA ASOCIACIÓN PANAMERICANA DE JUEGOS Y DEPORTES AUTÓCTONOS Y TRADICIONALES. LIMA-PERÚ MARACAIBO, 2020 3 Esta publicación es auspiciada por el Centro Experimental de Estudios Latinoamericanos “Dr. Gastón Parra Luzardo”, de la Universidad del Zulia, de Maracaibo-Venezuela, y la Asociación Panamericana de Juegos y Deportes Autóctonos y Tradicionales (APJDAT), de Lima-Perú Editor: Eloy Altuve Mejía Prohibida cualquier reproducción, adaptación, representación o edición sin la debida autorización 4 Serie Sociología Política del Deporte, desde América Latina y El Caribe. Volumen Uno Número de Depósito Legal: ZU2020000116 ISBN: 978-980-18-1232-6 Deporte, Poder, Globalización y Sociología Política. Número de Depósito Legal: ZU2020000111 ISBN: 978-980-18-1198-5 5 Centro Experimental de Estudios Latinoamericanos, “Dr. Gastón Parra Luzardo”, de la Universidad del Zulia (CEELA de LUZ). Directora: Nebis Acosta Redes sociales: [email protected]; @luzceela Asociación Panamericana de Juegos y Deportes Autóctonos y Tradicionales (APJDAT) Lima–Perú Director: Wilfredo Chau Lazares Redes sociales: [email protected]; https://www.facebook.com/APJDAT/ ; @APJDAT Celular: +51 910 828 162 Tel. Oficina: +511 422 2951 Diseño y Montaje: Ediliana Carrion Portada: Alexy Fernández, Eloy Altuve y Ediliana Carrion Edición Digital 6 DEDICATORIA Y HOMENAJE La Serie Sociología Política del Deporte desde América Latina y El Caribe, está dedicada a excluídos y excluídas, la inmensa mayoría de los habitantes del planeta que solemos olvidar o invisibilizar.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program
    Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program Specific Pavement Studies (SPS) Development of Experiment Design: SPS-12 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Preservation Study PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HIF-18-064 October 2018 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD Pavement preservation represents a proactive approach to maintaining and extending the lives of existing highways. Until recently, limited rigorous performance research existed on the effects of pavement preservation treatments, and consequently there was a reliance on anecdotal information. However, research findings over the past few years are proving that preservation can be an effective approach to extend pavement’s effective service life, improve safety and service condition, and is cost-efficient. The purpose of this report is to document the recommended experimental design for the Long- Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) SPS-12 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement Preservation Study. This study has been designed to establish the impact of selected preservation treatments on pavement performance under different loading and environmental conditions through a field study of in-service pavements starting from construction of the preservation treatments under consideration. The underlying concept of this experiment is to apply the same preservation treatment, at different times, on the same pavement structure to determine the effectiveness of a single application of a treatment as a function of pavement condition and time. This experiment is designed to answer the question on when is the best time to apply a preservation treatment on PCC pavements. It will also enable development and implementation of important pavement preservation products and tools, such as addition of pavement preservation considerations to the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide and associated software.
    [Show full text]