FHWA AMRP FY 2020 Enacted.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FHWA AMRP FY 2020 Enacted.Pdf United States Department of Transportation FY 2020 Annual Modal Research Plans Federal Highway Administration May 1, 2019 Nicole Nason Administrator Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1: Introduction/Agency‐Wide Research Approach ................................................................ 8 Chapter 2. High Priority Project Descriptions ........................................................................................ 16 Chapter 3 ‐ FY 2020 Program Descriptions ............................................................................................. 34 Chapter 4 – FY 2021 Program Descriptions .......................................................................................... 250 FHWA FY2020‐FY2021 AMRP– March 2019 Page 1 Executive Summary The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) addresses current issues and emerging challenges, creates efficiencies in the highway and transportation sector, and provides information to support policy decisions through its Research and Technology (R&T) programs. FHWA conducts advanced and applied research; coordinates and collaborates with other research organizations, both nationally and internationally, to leverage knowledge; and develops and delivers solutions to address highway transportation needs. FHWA is uniquely positioned to identify and address highway issues of national significance and build effective partnerships that leverage and maximize the value of the Federal investment in highway R&T activities. FHWA’s Office of Research, Development, and Technology (RD&T) is located at the Turner‐ Fairbank Highway Research Center (TFHRC), a Federally owned and operated national research facility in McLean, Virginia. The TFHRC houses more than 20 laboratories and support facilities and conducts exploratory and applied research. TFHRC staff administer the majority of FHWA’s research and development (R&D) activities in the areas of infrastructure, operations, and safety. Research in the areas of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), policy, innovative finance, planning, and the environment is primarily conducted or administered by FHWA offices located at U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Headquarters FHWA has a long history of strong partnerships and collaboration with the States, Federal agencies, academia, and private industry to coordinate efforts and leverage the unique capabilities of each to advance shared goals. FHWA’s R&T program is coordinated with R&T activities conducted through the University Transportation Center research program, the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research Program, and State‐based R&T initiatives. In addition, FHWA develops joint strategies to address USDOT goals with modal stakeholders, including the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Railroad Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. FHWA provides unique capabilities to support research that is of national significance but which other partner organizations and private industry are unable or unwilling to conduct. Working within this partnership framework, FHWA strategically identifies opportunities for collaboration, coordination, and independent research that advances the goals of the Agency and the Department. FHWA also works closely with the TRB‐sponsored advisory group, the Research and Technology Coordinating Committee (RTCC), which consists of academic and industry specialists, to provide an outside perspective on the direction of the R&T program and identify future opportunities for coordination and collaboration. This independent evaluation and consultation provides valuable insight into opportunities for continuous improvement within the R&T program. FHWA’s core R&T program activities improve safety, reduce congestion, enhance infrastructure design and construction, and provide data and analyses to decision‐makers throughout the transportation community. FHWA FY2020‐FY2021 AMRP– March 2019 Page 2 • The Safety area addresses the contributing factors for deaths and injuries related to roadway design, construction, and maintenance, and develops robust data analysis tools that enable transportation professionals to match those contributing factors with cost‐effective countermeasures. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2020, the FHWA Safety R&T program will invest in topics such as an integrated and holistic process for safety analysis that merges hotspot and systemic models for a balanced approach that ensures the best possible selection of safety improvements; an investigation of pedestrian‐intersection treatments across several geographic locations; and human behavior studies of driver interactions with automated truck platooning. • The Infrastructure area engages in forward‐looking research that supports safety, durability, resilience, environmental sustainability, and asset management. FHWA infrastructure research outcomes stimulate economic growth, productivity, and competitiveness through contributions to improved mobility and accessibility. In FY20, work initiated through the Accelerated Implementation and Deployment of Pavement Technologies program will include development of technical guidance in several areas—including emerging asphalt performance tests, equipment certification for performance measurement, and improved pavement foundations— and work to advance continuous friction measurement and management to improve pavement safety. Construction and Project Management Program activities will include peer exchanges on the use of Unmanned Aerial Systems and activities to advance the application of Building Information Modeling in highway infrastructure engineering and management practice. Characterization of the durability of recycled materials used as backfills, updated guidance and training on slope management, and implementation of a geotechnical asset management framework will be among the activities initiated through the Geotechnical and Hydraulics program. Long‐ Term Infrastructure Performance Program activities in 2020 will include analysis to develop improved models to predict bridge deck performance, while Pavements and Materials program activities will include documentation of the business case for performance‐related specification and validation of a potentially ground‐breaking test method for detecting the potential for concrete deterioration due to alkali silica reactivity. In FY20, Structures program activities include the pursuit of innovative short‐span bridge superstructures that take advantage of advance materials, deployment of the National Tunnel Inspection Standards, and investigation of the use of drones for bridge inspection. FY20 Transportation Performance Management, Asset Management, and Maintenance activities will include asset management case studies and technical guidance for several bridge preservation practices. • The Operations area develops innovative technologies and processes that lead to system‐wide improvements in how FHWA and its State and local partners manage and improve the efficiency and reliability of the National Highway System. In FY20, the FHWA Operations research area will work with Automated Driving Systems (ADS) stakeholders to identify alternative integration scenarios that will proactively FHWA FY2020‐FY2021 AMRP– March 2019 Page 3 prepare the roadway environment for the deployment of ADS. These integration scenarios will increase the understanding of how both public and private entities can support the safe integration of ADS from organizational and technical perspectives. The program will also focus on Cooperative Automation that will address the ability of ADS to navigate challenging roadway environments such as adverse weather conditions, work zones, or traffic incidents. The Operations area will support effective mobility through research into how to best apply Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) strategies in rural areas, development of a TSMO strategy toolkit to assist practitioners in identifying appropriate TSMO solutions, and exploring the nexus between TSMO and safety to better understand how TSMO and safety strategies can work together. The Operations area will continue to support performance‐based management of and investment in transportation through research and technical assistance on analytical tools, congestion and reliability performance management rules, a data framework supporting transportation management for non‐recurring events, and evaluation of the results from funding alternatives grants. The Operations research programs will develop and issue a Notice of Proposed Amendments for a new edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and manage the rulemaking process. The Operations area will also continue to support freight mobility to enhance the movement of goods and support economic competitiveness through efforts such as an analysis of urban and rural intermodal freight connectors, producing improved analytical tools, peer exchanges, and dissemination of best practices to State and local partners. For example, the Emergency Route Working Group required by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act will provide recommendations that will inform some research programs. Additionally, the Office of Operations will develop an FHWA Truck Size and Weight Research
Recommended publications
  • Interstate 11 Update
    Management Comm ittee Maricopa Association of Governments June 9, 2010 Interstate 11 Update © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 1 Bordering States COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS TiTourism and RRtiecreation . GEORGE:ST . GEORGE:ST Scottsdale of Utah? California California Las Las Navajjj o Nation relates Population: Population:Vegas Vegas Grand Canyon more to New Mexico TOURISM TOURISM 60 M60 M by 2050!by 2050! 1717 II --1717 2525 High-tech High -tech Bedroom Bedroom Extension? Extension? communitycommunity community community industry along II --2525 People People Businesses Businesses Eager/ Springerville Second homes provide shopping/ services to Western New ECONOMIC DE Tourists Tourists Mexico Mexico Commercial Vehicles agriculture agriculture V Mexico’s fastest ELOPMENT growing states are in the north (Sonora, Chihuahua, and Nuevo Leon) Leon) Keyyy CONNECTIONS to Guaymas, Hermosillo, Punta Colonet maquiladoras Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 2 Arizona Arizona COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS .. Commercial Trucking .. Distribution throughout Southwest USA R e c r e a t i o n .. Elevation in Central Arizona (SR(SR--89/SR89/SR--69)69) Pearce Pearce Growth Growth .. USUS--95/SR95/SR--95 Corridor95 Corridor Ferry Ferry Limitations CANAMEX.. CANAMEX .. Natural Resources .. Copper in Safford Area InIn-- .. Emerging Industries rn rn EX?EX? migggration eeee .. Welton Oil Refinery MMMM Warehousing.. Warehousing WestWest CANACANA .. Sun Corridor Megaregion Population Prescott.. Prescott will double Copppper pp mining mining Phoenix.. Phoenix Tucson.. Tucson Agrarian Agrarian Industrial Industrial .. Recreation and Tourism Incoming Incoming Informal Truck Bypasses Commerce! Warehousing/Distribution Hub Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 3 2006 Tonnage of TrailerTrailer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar and ContainerContainer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar Intermodal Moves Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Boondoggles 6 Big Projects
    HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. WRITTEN BY: GIDEON WEISSMAN AND BRYN HUXLEY-REICHER FRONTIER GROUP MATTHEW CASALE AND JOHN STOUT U.S. PIRG EDUCATION FUND DECEMBER 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Kevin Brubaker of Environmental Law & Policy Center, Clint Richmond of Massachusetts Sierra Club, Chris DeScherer and Sarah Stokes of Southern En- vironmental Law Center, Wendy Landman of WalkBoston, Jenna Stevens of Environment Florida, Ben Hellerstein of Environment Massachusetts, Abe Scarr of Illinois PIRG and Bay Scoggin of TexPIRG for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Frontier Group interns Christiane Paulhus and Hannah Scholl, and Susan Rakov, Tony Dutzik, David Lippeatt and Adrian Pforzheimer of Frontier Group for editorial support. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. Policy recommendations are those of NCPIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Project maps included in this report should be considered approximations based on publicly avail- able information and not used for planning purposes. 2020 NCPIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursu- ing their own narrow agendas, NCPIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor
    Alternative Interstate 11 Corridor From Wickenburg to Mexico Border Prepared by: Sanjeev Ramchandra, M.Ed. [email protected] June 2016 Updated: December 2017 Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor To Las Vegas • I-11 still replaces the existing US 93 corridor but a new corridor south of Wickenburg is proposed. • I-11 corridor uses existing highway contours with no urban sprawl and no new desert destruction. • I-11 provides quicker and safer travel to Lukeville border crossing and subsequently to Rocky Point. • I-11 between I-10 and I-8 becomes a southern bypass around Phoenix for I-10 through traffic. • I-11 is an alternate to I-19 for some truck traffic and reduces congestion from Nogales to Tucson. • I-11 generates additional sales tax revenues from To Rocky Point vacationers for state and local governments in AZ. Phoenix West Valley I-11 Corridor (see map) 1) I-11 shares US 60 from Wickenburg to L303. 2) I-11 replaces Loop 303 from US 60 to SR 30. 3) I-11 replaces SR 30 from Loop 303 to SR 85. 1 4) I-11 replaces SR 85 from SR 30 to Gila Bend. 5) I-111 replaces SR 30 from Loop 303 to L202. 6) I-311 replaces Loop 303 from US 60 to I-17. 7) SR 85 freeway segment links I-10 and I-11. 6 A) DO NOT put I-11 west of White Tank Mtns. B) DO NOT extend Loop 303 south of SR 30. C) DO NOT convert SR 74 into a freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • State Highway Administration Research Report Innovative Contracting Strategies for Combating Climate Change Qingbin Cui Xinyuan
    MD-11-SP009B4G STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH REPORT INNOVATIVE CONTRACTING STRATEGIES FOR COMBATING CLIMATE CHANGE QINGBIN CUI XINYUAN ZHU LISA WHITTEN ROSEMARY DASON-DEANE UNIVERITY OF MARYLAND SP009B4G FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2011 The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Maryland State Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient Catalog No. MD-11-SP009B4G 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Innovative Contracting Strategies for Combating Climate November 2011 Change 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors Qingbin Cui, Xinyuan Zhu, Lisa Whitten, Rosemary Dason- 8. Performing Organization Report No. Deane 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Maryland Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. College Park, MD 20742 SP009B4G 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Maryland State Highway Administration Final Report Office of Policy & Research 707 North Calvert Street 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (7120) STMD - MDOT/SHA 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The state of Maryland has made a strong commitment to combating climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This research investigated the state of practice of innovative contracting solutions to reduce emissions from highway construction activities. Implementation methods and challenges were identified and reported. Specifically, the report presents a framework of green performance contracting (GPC) that includes four levels of strategies, namely material related strategies, equipment and energy efficiency related strategies, green life-cycle strategies, and clean energy development strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Highway Program: from Concept to Reality
    Solar Highway Program: From Concept to Reality A Guidebook for Departments of Transportation to Develop Solar Photovoltaic Systems in the Highway Right-Of-Way November 2016 (Revision) (Original August 2011) Oregon Department of Transportation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Key contributors The authors would like to thank the following individuals and organizations for their advice and expertise, without which the guidebook would not have been possible. Oregon Department of Transportation, Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative Funding The Oregon Department of Transportation's Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative Funding works to create public- private partnerships benefiting the state transportation system and Oregonians. • Jim Whitty, Manager (retired) • Allison Hamilton, Oregon Solar Highway Program Manager • Lynn Averbeck, Project Director (former) Five Stars International. Ltd. Five Stars International performs management consulting and professional services for the public and private sectors including leadership development, coaching and mentoring; program administration and support services; program and organizational reviews; and building public-private partnerships. • Lynn Frank, President Portland General Electric Portland General Electric is Oregon's largest electric utility and is committed to expanding renewable energy production to address climate change and meet the growing needs in the state's energy future. • Mark Osborn, Distributed Resources Manager (former) Good Company Good Company has helped organizations measure, manage, and market their triple- bottom-line since 2001. Good Company focuses on the agencies and industries that serve human needs - particularly food, energy, materials, transportation, waste, and public infrastructure. Good Company’s team is composed of practical environmental, business, and social science professionals that believe with our customers in making sustainability work for development and construction, operations and new ventures.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of DELAFIELD BOARD of SUPERVISORS MEETING January 26, 2016
    TOWN OF DELAFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING January 26, 2016 Members Present: L. Krause, C. Duchow, E. Kranick, R. Troy Members Absent: P. Van Horn Others Present : T. Barbeau, Town Engineer, K. Smith, Lake Country Reporter, 4 Citizens First order of business: Call to Order Chairman Krause called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Second order of business: Pledge of Allegiance Third order of business: Citizen Comments There were no citizen comments. Fourth order of business: Approval of January 11, 2016 Town Board Minutes The minutes will be filed as prepared by the clerk. Fifth order of business: Action on vouchers submitted for payment: A. Report on budget sub-accounts and action to amend 2016 budget B. 1) Accounts payable; 2) Payroll Accounts Payable MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF CHECKS #56730 TO #56777 IN THE AMOUNT OF $106,835.79 Payroll MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,843.96 MS. DUCHOW/MR. KRANICK MOTION CARRIED Sixth order of business: Communications ( for discussion and possible action) A. None Seventh order of business: Unfinished Business A. Consideration and possible action on Urban Towns Committee Membership (tabled 1/11/16) Sharon Leair, County Unit Chairperson of the Waukesha County Unit of Wisconsin Towns Association, contacted Chairman Krause and requested to attend a future meeting to discuss this issue. The item remained on the table. Eighth order of business: New Business A. Presentation of USH 18 Access Management Vision and Consideration and Possible Action on Signing Memorandum of Understanding Aaron Michelson, Alex Valley and Robert Elkin of the WisDOT were in attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • Gasoline Taxes in America
    BACKGROUND PAPER October 2007, Number 56 Paying at the Pump: Gasoline Taxes in America by Jonathan Williams have eroded the original intent of gas taxes. In Executive Summary all too many instances, benefit-principle Over the past century, Americans have taxation has taken a backseat to political witnessed a marked increase in mobility pandering. For instance, current federal through safe and reliable roadways. This highway legislation authorized over 6,000 improved mobility has undoubtedly increased earmarks from the highway trust fund. Some the overall quality of life in the United States. of these went to legitimate transportation Gasoline taxes have provided the required programs, but others were earmarked for funds to build the roads that brought America items such as the infamous “bridge to into the transportation age. nowhere.” Today, gasoline tax revenue is spent on everything from public education and Gasoline taxes are often mentioned as the museums to graffiti removal and parking best form of taxation from an economic garages. perspective because they provide a system of road funding by simply charging road users when they fill up their tanks. This “user tax” adheres to what economists refer to as the From the very inception of gasoline benefit principle of taxation. taxation, public officials have faced Early gasoline taxes in the states were temptation to divert gasoline tax explicitly created in an attempt to charge road users for the privilege of using roads. How- revenue to projects that are only ever, from the very inception of gasoline tangentially related to taxation, public officials have faced tempta- tion to divert gasoline tax revenue to projects transportation and that are often that are only tangentially related to transpor- purely politically motivated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fhwa/Tx-11/0-6267-2 Benefits of Public Roadside
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-11/0-6267-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date BENEFITS OF PUBLIC ROADSIDE SAFETY REST AREAS IN Published: May 2011 TEXAS: TECHNICAL REPORT 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jodi L. Carson, Val J. Pezoldt, Nicholas Koncz, and Kwaku Obeng- Report 0-6267-2 Boampong 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-6267 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2008–February 2011 P. O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Benefits of Public Roadside Safety Rest Areas in Texas URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6267-2.pdf 16. Abstract The objective of this investigation was to develop a benefit-cost analysis methodology for safety rest areas in Texas and to demonstrate its application in select corridors throughout the state. In addition, this project considered novel safety rest area development approaches that could reduce the public cost burden borne by individual public agencies. Based upon the available supporting data for Texas, a benefit-cost ratio relationship was developed that included safety, comfort and convenience, and excess travel and diversion benefits accrued by highway users; direct monetary benefits accrued by highway or other public agencies; economic development/tourism and specific business enterprise benefits accrued by external entities and direct monetary cost accrued by highway or other public agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Appendices to Agenda Items 4A and 4B Agenda
    Public Document Pack ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL CABINET Monday, 3 February 2014 at 6.15 pm SUPPLEMENTARY PAPERS 4a Rochdale Borough Transport Strategy Refresh – Appendices 4b Rochdale Borough Local Flood Risk Management Strategy - Appendices ROCHDALE BOROUGH TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2014 REFRESH Mark Widdup Director of Economy and Environment Enquiries: please contact :- Strategic Planning Service Email: [email protected] Tel: (01706) – 924361 February 2014 Page 1 Vision By 2026 Rochdale Borough will have an affordable, sustainable, reliable, accessible and integrated transport network that offers travel choice for all, serves its communities, tackles air quality and climate change, enhances social inclusion, public health and supports economic growth and regeneration of the local area. Underlying Principles Support the Borough’s environment, sustainability and public health agenda, tackling climate change through reducing emissions from transport, influencing travel choice, reducing natural resource use and carbon emissions and improving air quality by offering more opportunities / choice for people to travel actively, and by sustainable means. Support the Borough’s strategic land use objectives which will better integrate with transport provision and support economic growth, access to employment opportunities, housing and other development in accessible locations where there is network capacity and connectivity is good. Address concerns from the public who experience increasing delays and congestion, reducing
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program
    Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program Specific Pavement Studies (SPS) Development of Experiment Design: SPS-12 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Preservation Study PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HIF-18-064 October 2018 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD Pavement preservation represents a proactive approach to maintaining and extending the lives of existing highways. Until recently, limited rigorous performance research existed on the effects of pavement preservation treatments, and consequently there was a reliance on anecdotal information. However, research findings over the past few years are proving that preservation can be an effective approach to extend pavement’s effective service life, improve safety and service condition, and is cost-efficient. The purpose of this report is to document the recommended experimental design for the Long- Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) SPS-12 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement Preservation Study. This study has been designed to establish the impact of selected preservation treatments on pavement performance under different loading and environmental conditions through a field study of in-service pavements starting from construction of the preservation treatments under consideration. The underlying concept of this experiment is to apply the same preservation treatment, at different times, on the same pavement structure to determine the effectiveness of a single application of a treatment as a function of pavement condition and time. This experiment is designed to answer the question on when is the best time to apply a preservation treatment on PCC pavements. It will also enable development and implementation of important pavement preservation products and tools, such as addition of pavement preservation considerations to the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide and associated software.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Congestion Pricing and Highway Space Inventory Control System
    DYNAMIC TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: Dynamic Congestion Pricing and Highway Space Inventory Control System by Praveen Kumar Edara Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Dušan Teodorovi ć, Chair Antonio Trani Konstantinos Triantis Paul Schonfeld John Collura September 2005 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: Demand Management, Congestion Pricing, Dynamic Programming, Fuzzy Sets, Revenue Management, Artificial Neural Networks Copyright 2005, Praveen Edara DYNAMIC TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: Dynamic Congestion Pricing and Highway Space Inventory Control System Praveen Kumar Edara ABSTRACT The number of trips on highways and urban networks has significantly increased in the recent decades in many cities across the world. At the same time, the road network capacities have not kept up with this increase in travel demand. Urban road networks in many countries are severely congested, resulting in increased travel times, increased number of stops, unexpected delays, greater travel costs, inconvenience to drivers and passengers, increased air pollution and noise level, and increased number of traffic accidents. Expanding traffic network capacities by building more roads is extremely costly as well as environmentally damaging. More efficient usage of the existing supply is vital in order to sustain the growing travel demand. Travel Demand Management (TDM) techniques involving various strategies that increase the travel choices to the consumers have been proposed by the researchers, planners, and transportation professionals. TDM helps create a well balanced, less automobile dependent transportation system. In the past, several TDM strategies have been proposed and implemented in several cities around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Manual M 31‑11
    Publications Transmittal Transmittal Number Date PT 17-019 June 2017 Publication Title / Publication Number Environmental Manual M 31-11.17 Originating Organization Development Division, Environmental Services Office Remarks and Instructions In this edition of the Environmental Manual Chapter 425 had a major update to organize and clarify existing policy. All other chapters had minor updates to reflect current WSDOT environmental policies, fix broken links, remove reference to Documented Categorical Exclusions (DCEs), add the new Environmental Policy (EO 1018.02), and update the Interagency Agreements list. We recommend use of the on-line version of this manual for easy access to WSDOT support webpages. The complete manual, revision packages, and individual chapters can be accessed at www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/m31-11.htm. Please contact Ashley Carle at 360-705-7493 or [email protected] with comments, questions, or suggestions for improvement to the manual. To get the latest information, please sign up for email updates for individual publications at www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals. Washington State Department of Transportation Environmental Services Office PO Box 47331 Olympia, WA 98504 Approved By Signature Environmental Manual M 31-11.17 June 2017 Engineering and Regional Operations Development Division, Environmental Services Office Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the WSDOT Diversity/ADA Aff airs Team [email protected] or
    [Show full text]