DOCSLIB.ORG

PROPOSAL to DESIGNATE US ROUTE 93 AS a FUTURE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY EXHIBIT C - LOGISTICS Meeting Date: April 26, 2010 Document Consists of 22 Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Legislative Commission’s Subcommittee to Study the Development and Promotion of Logistics and Distribution Centers Concerning Infrastructure and Transportation Nevada State Legislature April 26, 2010 PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE US ROUTE 93 AS A FUTURE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY EXHIBIT C - LOGISTICS Meeting Date: April 26, 2010 Document consists of 22 pages. Entire Exhibit Provided. © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 1 Bordering States COG/ MPO DISCUSSIONS Tourism and Recreation ST. GEORGE: Scottsdale of Utah? California Las Navajo Nation relates Population: Vegas Grand Canyon more to New Mexico TOURISM 60 M by 2050! 17 I-17 25 High-tech Bedroom Extension? community industry along I-25 People Businesses Eager/ Springerville Second homes provide shopping/ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT services to Western Tourists New Mexico Commercial Vehicles agriculture Mexico’s fastest growing states are in the north (Sonora, Chihuahua, and Nuevo Leon) Key CONNECTIONS to Guaymas, Hermosillo, Punta Colonet maquiladoras Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 2 Arizona COG/ MPO DISCUSSIONS . Commercial Trucking . Distribution throughout Southwest USA R e c r e a t i o n . Elevation in Central Arizona (SR-89/SR-69) Pearce Growth . US-95/SR-95 Corridor Ferry Limitations . CANAMEX . Natural Resources . Copper in Safford Area In- . Emerging Industries migration . Welton Oil Refinery . Warehousing Western CANAMEX? . Sun Corridor Population Megaregion will double Copper mining . Prescott . Phoenix Agrarian Industrial . Tucson Incoming . Recreation and Tourism Informal Truck Bypasses Commerce! Warehousing/Distribution Hub Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 3 2006 Tonnage of Trailer -on-Flatcarand Container-on-Flatcar Intermodal Moves Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 4 2035 Major Truck Routes on the National Highway System Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 5 2002 Tonnage on Highways, Railroads and Inland Waterways Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 6 2002 Ton-Miles of Truck Shipment Arizona Co l o r a d o Leavi n g 10 % Leavi n g 12% Through Entering 25% 14 % Entering Lo cal 19 % Within 1% Through 13% 62% Within Lo c a l 43% 1% California Te x a s Lo cal Through 1% 2% Leavi n g Leavi n g 13% Through 14 % 22% Lo cal Entering 0% Entering 16 % 17% Within 68% Within 47% Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 7 2007 Port Activities World Ports U.S.A. Ports (Thousands of full and empty TEUs) (Thousands of full and empty TEUs) 30,000 30,000 25,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 Punta Colonet 6 million TEU 10,000 10,000 By 20 30 5,000 5,000 - - Punta Colonet 1 million TEU Opening Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 8 Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 9 Inland Port Opportunities Union Pacific BNSF Railway BNSF Railway KINGMAN I N TERSTATE 11 Hassayampa Corridor P HOENIX YUMA TUCSON Punta Colonet Union Pacific Gu ym a s © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 10 Metropolitan Growth Phoenix-Me s a , AZ MS A Tucson, AZ MSA Las Vegas, NV-AZ MS A 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 - - - Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 11 Interstate Highway System 1956 Federal-Aid Authorization Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 12 Interstate Highway System 19 5 7-1992 Additions Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 13 Interstate Highway System ISTEA and TEA21 High Priority Corridor Additions Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 14 Interstate Highway System Interstate 11 Corridor Fr ei g h t Opportunities Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 15 Gaps and Issues . Boulder City Bypass . Bridging the Colorado River at Hoover Dam . US-93 widening . Extension into Phoenix US-93, South of Hoover Dam. Along Grand Avenue? Bypass Phoenix? Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 16 US-93/Hoover Dam Bypass Mike O'Callaghan –Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge Open for traffic –December 2010 © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 17 Hassayampa Framework Accepted by the MAG Regional Council, February 2008. Hidden Valley Framework Accepted by the MAG Regional Council, September 2009. Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 18 Statewide Framework Accepted by the State Transportation Board, January 2010. Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 19 CAN-DO: The Interstate 11 Coalition Connecting Arizona and Nevada –Delivery Opportunities . Town of Buckeye, AZ . America Nevada Company . City of Kingman, AZ . AREA Property Partners . Maricopa County, AZ . Arizona Builder’s Alliance . Town of Wickenburg, AZ . Associated General Contractors Arizona . Yavapai County, AZ . Belmont . Boulder City, NV . Buckeye Valley Chamber of Commerce . City of Las Vegas, NV . Buckeye Valley Development, Inc. Regional Transportation Commission of . Douglas Ranch Southern Nevada . The Greenspun Company . JDM Partners . Langley Properties . Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority . NAIOP Southern Nevada Chapter . The Nevada Development Authority . Pulte Homes Corporation . The Sundt Companies . Swift Transportation, Inc. Wickenburg Chamber of Commerce Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 20 Freight Framework Study Proposed for FY2011 Unified Planning Work Program Tim Strow, Project Manager Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 21 For more information . Bob Hazlett [email protected] 602 254-6300 Proposal to Designate US Route 93 as a Future Interstate Highway © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 22.
Recommended publications
  • Interstate 11 Update

    Interstate 11 Update

    Management Comm ittee Maricopa Association of Governments June 9, 2010 Interstate 11 Update © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 1 Bordering States COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS TiTourism and RRtiecreation . GEORGE:ST . GEORGE:ST Scottsdale of Utah? California California Las Las Navajjj o Nation relates Population: Population:Vegas Vegas Grand Canyon more to New Mexico TOURISM TOURISM 60 M60 M by 2050!by 2050! 1717 II --1717 2525 High-tech High -tech Bedroom Bedroom Extension? Extension? communitycommunity community community industry along II --2525 People People Businesses Businesses Eager/ Springerville Second homes provide shopping/ services to Western New ECONOMIC DE Tourists Tourists Mexico Mexico Commercial Vehicles agriculture agriculture V Mexico’s fastest ELOPMENT growing states are in the north (Sonora, Chihuahua, and Nuevo Leon) Leon) Keyyy CONNECTIONS to Guaymas, Hermosillo, Punta Colonet maquiladoras Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 2 Arizona Arizona COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS .. Commercial Trucking .. Distribution throughout Southwest USA R e c r e a t i o n .. Elevation in Central Arizona (SR(SR--89/SR89/SR--69)69) Pearce Pearce Growth Growth .. USUS--95/SR95/SR--95 Corridor95 Corridor Ferry Ferry Limitations CANAMEX.. CANAMEX .. Natural Resources .. Copper in Safford Area InIn-- .. Emerging Industries rn rn EX?EX? migggration eeee .. Welton Oil Refinery MMMM Warehousing.. Warehousing WestWest CANACANA .. Sun Corridor Megaregion Population Prescott.. Prescott will double Copppper pp mining mining Phoenix.. Phoenix Tucson.. Tucson Agrarian Agrarian Industrial Industrial .. Recreation and Tourism Incoming Incoming Informal Truck Bypasses Commerce! Warehousing/Distribution Hub Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 3 2006 Tonnage of TrailerTrailer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar and ContainerContainer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar Intermodal Moves Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved.
  • Highway Boondoggles 6 Big Projects

    Highway Boondoggles 6 Big Projects

    HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. WRITTEN BY: GIDEON WEISSMAN AND BRYN HUXLEY-REICHER FRONTIER GROUP MATTHEW CASALE AND JOHN STOUT U.S. PIRG EDUCATION FUND DECEMBER 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Kevin Brubaker of Environmental Law & Policy Center, Clint Richmond of Massachusetts Sierra Club, Chris DeScherer and Sarah Stokes of Southern En- vironmental Law Center, Wendy Landman of WalkBoston, Jenna Stevens of Environment Florida, Ben Hellerstein of Environment Massachusetts, Abe Scarr of Illinois PIRG and Bay Scoggin of TexPIRG for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Frontier Group interns Christiane Paulhus and Hannah Scholl, and Susan Rakov, Tony Dutzik, David Lippeatt and Adrian Pforzheimer of Frontier Group for editorial support. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. Policy recommendations are those of NCPIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Project maps included in this report should be considered approximations based on publicly avail- able information and not used for planning purposes. 2020 NCPIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursu- ing their own narrow agendas, NCPIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest.
  • WCCC Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting

    WCCC Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting

    WCCC Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, April 21 – Wednesday, April 22, 2009 Hosts: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Alaska Railroad Corporation 327 W Ship Creek Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (Note: All Times as Alaska Daylight Time – 1 Hour Earlier than WA, OR, CA) SANDAG Staff Contact: Linda Culp, (619) 699-6957; [email protected] Conference Call Information For All Meetings: 1-877-356- 9437, Access Code 9805119 Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:00 pm ITS, Operations, and Environment Committee Alternative Fuel Corridor Program Climate Change Activities Alaska Environmental Strategies Best Practices Manual Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:30 am WCCC Board of Directors Coalition Business Plan Outreach Program Funding Opportunities Goods Movement Committee Federal Relations Committee Marad Port and Intermodal System Report Goods Movement in Alaska 2:00 pm Adjourn www.westcoastcorridors.org MEETING LOCATION Meetings are being hosted by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Alaska Railroad Corporation. The physical location will be at the Railroad Corporation: Alaska Railroad Corporation 327 W Ship Creek Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Offices are about 7 miles from the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport. Please RSVP for the meeting as we may have transportation arranged to and from the airport and we’ll need your name for security reasons at the office. 2 ITS, Operations and Environment Committee Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:00 PM Bruce Agnew, Rex Burkholder, Co-Chairs Agenda ITEM # ACTION 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS (Bruce Agnew, Co-Chair) 2. ALTERNATIVE FUEL CORRIDOR PROGRAM: +2A. INTERSTATE CLEAN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR INFORMATION (Cliff Gladstein, President, Gladstein & Neandross) This program, started in 1996, has led to $50 million for alternative fueling stations on parts of I-5, CA-99, I-10, I-15, and I-80 in California, Nevada, and Utah.
  • FHWA AMRP FY 2020 Enacted.Pdf

    FHWA AMRP FY 2020 Enacted.Pdf

    United States Department of Transportation FY 2020 Annual Modal Research Plans Federal Highway Administration May 1, 2019 Nicole Nason Administrator Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1: Introduction/Agency‐Wide Research Approach ................................................................ 8 Chapter 2. High Priority Project Descriptions ........................................................................................ 16 Chapter 3 ‐ FY 2020 Program Descriptions ............................................................................................. 34 Chapter 4 – FY 2021 Program Descriptions .......................................................................................... 250 FHWA FY2020‐FY2021 AMRP– March 2019 Page 1 Executive Summary The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) addresses current issues and emerging challenges, creates efficiencies in the highway and transportation sector, and provides information to support policy decisions through its Research and Technology (R&T) programs. FHWA conducts advanced and applied research; coordinates and collaborates with other research organizations, both nationally and internationally, to leverage knowledge; and develops and delivers solutions to address highway transportation needs. FHWA is uniquely positioned to identify and address highway issues of national significance and build effective partnerships that leverage and
  • Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor

    Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor

    Alternative Interstate 11 Corridor From Wickenburg to Mexico Border Prepared by: Sanjeev Ramchandra, M.Ed. [email protected] June 2016 Updated: December 2017 Summary / Overview of Proposed I-11 Corridor To Las Vegas • I-11 still replaces the existing US 93 corridor but a new corridor south of Wickenburg is proposed. • I-11 corridor uses existing highway contours with no urban sprawl and no new desert destruction. • I-11 provides quicker and safer travel to Lukeville border crossing and subsequently to Rocky Point. • I-11 between I-10 and I-8 becomes a southern bypass around Phoenix for I-10 through traffic. • I-11 is an alternate to I-19 for some truck traffic and reduces congestion from Nogales to Tucson. • I-11 generates additional sales tax revenues from To Rocky Point vacationers for state and local governments in AZ. Phoenix West Valley I-11 Corridor (see map) 1) I-11 shares US 60 from Wickenburg to L303. 2) I-11 replaces Loop 303 from US 60 to SR 30. 3) I-11 replaces SR 30 from Loop 303 to SR 85. 1 4) I-11 replaces SR 85 from SR 30 to Gila Bend. 5) I-111 replaces SR 30 from Loop 303 to L202. 6) I-311 replaces Loop 303 from US 60 to I-17. 7) SR 85 freeway segment links I-10 and I-11. 6 A) DO NOT put I-11 west of White Tank Mtns. B) DO NOT extend Loop 303 south of SR 30. C) DO NOT convert SR 74 into a freeway.
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017

    I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017

    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
  • Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports

    Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports

    Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports July 2012 Committee for the Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. - Chairman Lowry A. Crook - Former Chief of Staff Ronald Murphy - Managing Director Rebecca Fenneman - General Counsel Olubukola Akande-Elemoso - Office of the Chairman Lauren Engel - Office of the General Counsel Michael Gordon - Office of the Managing Director Jason Guthrie - Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services Gary Kardian - Bureau of Trade Analysis Dr. Roy Pearson - Bureau of Trade Analysis Paul Schofield - Office of the General Counsel Matthew Drenan - Summer Law Clerk Jewel Jennings-Wright - Summer Law Clerk Foreword Thirty years ago, U.S. East Coast port officials watched in wonder as containerized cargo sitting on their piers was taken away by trucks to the Port of Montreal for export. At that time, I concluded in a law review article that this diversion of container cargo was legal under Federal Maritime Commission law and regulation, but would continue to be unresolved until a solution on this cross-border traffic was reached: “Contiguous nations that are engaged in international trade in the age of containerization can compete for cargo on equal footings and ensure that their national interests, laws, public policy and economic health keep pace with technological innovations.” [Emphasis Added] The mark of a successful port is competition. Sufficient berths, state-of-the-art cranes, efficient handling, adequate acreage, easy rail and road connections, and sophisticated logistical programs facilitating transportation to hinterland destinations are all tools in the daily cargo contest.
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B

    Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
  • 2012 Corridor System Master Plan

    2012 Corridor System Master Plan

    MARCH 2012 CALIFORNIANEVADAARIZONAUTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN MOVINGPEOPLE MOVINGGOODS Acknowledgements The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) and the • City of Orem associated technical studies are products of the hard work and • City of Rancho Cucamonga commitment of each of the I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and their dedicated staff. Their efforts are a • City of South Salt Lake testament of outstanding partnership and a true spirit of collabo- • City of St. George ration, without which this Master Plan could not have succeeded. • Clark County Department of Aviation Susan Martinovich, Director of the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) and 2011 American Association of State • Clark County Public Works Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) President, served • County of San Bernardino as the Chair of the Alliance’s Executive Board and, through her agency, provided the initial funding for this effort. Without this • DesertXpress support, the creation of the Master Plan and Alliance would not • Economic Development Corporation of Utah have been possible. Her leadership and vision were an inspiration to all those participating in the Alliance. • El Dorado Holdings • Envision Utah I-15 Mobility Alliance Partners • Federal Highway Administration The I-15 Mobility Alliance partners that have participated in this • Federal Railroad Administration effort are listed below in alphabetical order. • Five County Association of Governments • American Magline Group • Freeway and Arterial System
  • NCIT the National Center for Intermodal Transportation

    NCIT the National Center for Intermodal Transportation

    NCIT The National Center for Intermodal Transportation INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FOR ASIAN GOODS TO U.S. VIA MEXICO: AN ANALYSIS JUNE 2010 Ismail Capar, Arunachalam Narayanan, Malini Natarajarathinam Industrial Distribution Program Texas A&M University, College Station, TX – 77843‐3367 1 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Trade Data ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Road infrastructure: ........................................................................................................................... 8 Technical evaluation of Regional Logistical Infrastructure ............................................................... 9 Highway corridor 2012: ............................................................................................................................ 9 Ranking the Highway Corridor road networks: .....................................................................................
  • Mexico Oil & Gas Report INCLUDES BMI's FORECASTS

    Mexico Oil & Gas Report INCLUDES BMI's FORECASTS

    Q4 2011 www.businessmonitor.com MEXICO OIL & GAS REPORT INCLUDES BMI'S FORECASTS ISSN 1748-4111 Published by Business Monitor International Ltd. MEXICO OIL & GAS REPORT Q4 2011 INCLUDES 10-YEAR FORECASTS TO 2020 Part of BMI’s Industry Survey & Forecasts Series Published by: Business Monitor International Copy deadline: October 2011 Business Monitor International © 2011 Business Monitor International. Limited All rights reserved. 85 Queen Victoria Street London All information contained in this publication EC4V 4AB is copyrighted in the name of Business UK Monitor International, and as such no part of Tel: +44 (0) 20 7248 0468 this publication may be reproduced, Fax: +44 (0) 20 7248 0467 repackaged, redistributed, resold in whole or Email: [email protected] in any part, or used in any form or by any Web: means graphic, electronic or mechanical, http://www.businessmonitor.com including photocopying, recording, taping, or by information storage or retrieval, or by any other means, without the express written consent of the publisher. DISCLAIMER All information contained in this publication has been researched and compiled from sources believed to be accurate and reliable at the time of publishing. However, in view of the natural scope for human and/or mechanical error, either at source or during production, Business Monitor International accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage resulting from errors, inaccuracies or omissions affecting any part of the publication. All information is provided without warranty, and Business Monitor International makes no representation of warranty of any kind as to the accuracy or completeness of any information hereto contained. Mexico Oil & Gas Report Q4 2011 © Business Monitor International Ltd Page 2 Mexico Oil & Gas Report Q4 2011 CONTENTS Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................
  • CANAMEX: What Are the Opportunities?

    CANAMEX: What Are the Opportunities?

    CANAMEX: What are the Opportunities? th 24 Annual Pinal County Town Hall: Reactivating the Regional Economy October 12, 2011 Casa Grande, AZ Presented by Congressman Jim Kolbe, Chairman, Presentation Overview • What is CANAMEX? • How is it structured? • What are the priorities? • Where are the opportunities? CANAMEX a high priority corridor 1995 National Highway Systems Designation Act The CANAMEX Corridor from Nogales, Arizona, through Las Vegas, Nevada, to Salt Lake City, Utah, to Idaho Falls, Idaho, to Montana, to the Canadian Border as follows: (A) In the State of Arizona, the CANAMEX Corridor shall generally follow-- (i) I-19 from Nogales to Tucson; (ii) I-10 from Tucson to Phoenix; and (iii) United States Route 93 in the vicinity of Phoenix to the Nevada Border. (B) In the State of Nevada, the CANAMEX Corridor shall follow-- (i) United States Route 93 from the Arizona Border to Las Vegas; and (ii) I-15 from Las Vegas to the Utah Border. (C) From the Utah Border through Montana to the Canadian Border, the CANAMEX Corridor shall follow I-15. Broader Vision—More than a line on the Map, it supports jobs and facilitates economic activities • In 2010, the bilateral trade in goods between U.S. CANAMEX States and their NAFTA neighbors was nearly $29 billion • The trade relationship between Canada and the US CANAMEX States supports over 309,00 US jobs; when you include Mexico the total US jobs that rely on trade increases to 583,000. • An economic profile of the CANAMEX Trade Shed (Alberta to Mexico City) identified a consumer market of over 54 million.