2016 Chevrolet Volt Battery System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

2016 CHEVROLET VOLT BATTERY SYSTEM 2016 CHEVROLET VOLT BATTERY SYSTEM KEY WINS GEN 1 GEN 2 ■ Revolutionary liquid cooled ■ Mass reduction of 13 battery pack kg (196 kg) • Foundation for battery life performance ■ Useable capacity ■ World class Quality, Reliability, increase of 25% Durability and Capacity Retention (11.2kWh to 14kWh) • GM study of more than 300 ■ Power increase of 9% Volts in service in CA since launch in 2011: Approximately ■ Modular system 15 percent of owners achieve architecture more than 40 miles of EV range ■ All climate operation GEN 1 VOLT Cell Chemistry NMC-LMO Pouch BATTERY PACK Cell Configuration 96S 3P (288 cells) Discharge Power (10 s) 110 kW Charge Power (10 sec) 60 kW Usable Energy 10.2 – 11.2 kWh Total Energy 16.0 – 17.1 kWh Energy Density-Volume 118 Wh/l Energy Density-Mass 87 Wh/kg Nominal Voltage 360 V Mass 196 kg Pack Volume 145 L Cooling System Direct liquid fin # of Modules 9 Module Sizes 18 & 36 Cells GEN 2 VOLT Cell Chemistry NMC-LMO Pouch BATTERY PACK Cell Configuration 96S 2P (192 cells) Discharge Power (10s) 120 kW (+9%) Charge Power (10s) 60 kW Usable Energy 14.0 kWh (+25%) Total Energy 18.4 kWh (+8%) Energy Density-Volume 119 Wh/l (+1%) Energy Density-Mass 101 Wh/kg (+16%) Nominal Voltage 360 V Peak Voltage 395 V Peak Current 430 A Mass 183 kg Pack Volume 154 L Cooling System Direct liquid fin # of Modules 7 Module Sizes 24 & 32 Cells COMPARISONS GEN1 VOLT BATTERY PACK GEN2 VOLT BATTERY PACK Cell Chemistry NMC-LMO Pouch NMC-LMO Pouch Cell Configuration 96S 3P (288 cells) 96S 2P (192 cells) Discharge Power (10s) 110 kW 120 kW (+9%) Charge Power (10s) 60 kW 60 kW Usable Energy 10.2 – 11.2 kWh 14.0 kWh (+25%) Total Energy 16.0 – 17.1 kWh 18.4 kWh (+8%) Energy Density-Volume 118 Wh/l 119 Wh/l (+1%) Energy Density-Mass 87 Wh/kg 101 Wh/kg (+16%) Nominal Voltage 360 V 360 V Peak Voltage - 395 V Peak Current - 430 A Mass 196 kg 183 kg Pack Volume 145 L 154 L Cooling System Direct liquid fin Direct liquid fin # of Modules 9 7 Module Sizes 18 & 36 Cells 24 & 32 Cells WHAT DOES THIS MEAN TO CUSTOMERS? ■ 53 miles of EV range ■ Lower mass pack ■ Fewer cells ■ More overall energy storage ■ More power ■ More efficient ■ World class quality .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

PSH-12180FR 12 Volt 21.0 AH
PSH-12180FR 12 Volt 21.0 AH Features • Absorbent Glass Mat (AGM) technology for superior performance • Designedspecificallyforhigh-ratedischarge(UPS) applications • 80 Watts/cell for 15 min. of constant power • Ruggedplasticcaseandcover,flameretardant toUL94V-0 • Approved for transport by air. D.O.T., I.A.T.A., F.A.A. and C.A.B.certified • U.L.recognizedunderfilenumberMH20845 Terminals (mm) Performance Specifications 3.4 Nominal Voltage ........................................................................ 12 volts (6 cells) • F2:Quickdisconnect 6.35 Nominal Capacity AMP,INC.Fastontabs, 20-hr. (1.05A to 10.50 volts) ........................................................ 21.00AH 0.250” x 0.032” 7.95 0.8 • NB2:Tinplatedbrass 10-hr. (2A to 10.50 volts) .............................................................20.00AH post with nut & bolt 14 2 5-hr. (3.7A to 10.20 volts) ..........................................................18.50AH connectors 4.5 6 12 1-hr. (13Ato9.00volts) .............................................................13.00AH 15-min.(40Ato9.00volts) ............................................................... 10.00AH Physical Dimensions: in (mm) Approximate Weight ........................................................ 13.20lbs.(5.99kg) Energy Density (20-hr. rate) ............................... 1.77 W-h/in3 (107.86 W-h/l) Specific Energy (20-hr. rate) ............................. 19.09W-h/lb(42.09W-h/kg) W Internal Resistance (approx.) ...................................................... 12 milliohms Max
[Show full text]
Interstate Commerce Commission Washington
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION WASHINGTON REPORT NO. 3374 PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY IN BE ACCIDENT AT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., ON OCTOBER 10, 1950 - 2 - Report No. 3374 SUMMARY Date: October 10, 1950 Railroad: Pacific Electric Lo cation: Los Angeles, Calif. Kind of accident: Rear-end collision Trains involved; Freight Passenger Train numbers: Extra 1611 North 2113 Engine numbers: Electric locomo tive 1611 Consists: 2 muitiple-uelt 10 cars, caboose passenger cars Estimated speeds: 10 m. p h, Standing ft Operation: Timetable and operating rules Tracks: Four; tangent; ] percent descending grade northward Weather: Dense fog Time: 6:11 a. m. Casualties: 50 injured Cause: Failure properly to control speed of the following train in accordance with flagman's instructions - 3 - INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORT NO, 3374 IN THE MATTER OF MAKING ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS UNDER THE ACCIDENT REPORTS ACT OF MAY 6, 1910. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY January 5, 1951 Accident at Los Angeles, Calif., on October 10, 1950, caused by failure properly to control the speed of the following train in accordance with flagman's instructions. 1 REPORT OF THE COMMISSION PATTERSON, Commissioner: On October 10, 1950, there was a rear-end collision between a freight train and a passenger train on the Pacific Electric Railway at Los Angeles, Calif., which resulted in the injury of 48 passengers and 2 employees. This accident was investigated in conjunction with a representative of the Railroad Commission of the State of California. 1 Under authority of section 17 (2) of the Interstate Com merce Act the above-entitled proceeding was referred by the Commission to Commissioner Patterson for consideration and disposition.
[Show full text]
GOOGLE LLC V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GOOGLE LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT No. 18–956. Argued October 7, 2020—Decided April 5, 2021 Oracle America, Inc., owns a copyright in Java SE, a computer platform that uses the popular Java computer programming language. In 2005, Google acquired Android and sought to build a new software platform for mobile devices. To allow the millions of programmers familiar with the Java programming language to work with its new Android plat- form, Google copied roughly 11,500 lines of code from the Java SE pro- gram. The copied lines are part of a tool called an Application Pro- gramming Interface (API). An API allows programmers to call upon prewritten computing tasks for use in their own programs. Over the course of protracted litigation, the lower courts have considered (1) whether Java SE’s owner could copyright the copied lines from the API, and (2) if so, whether Google’s copying constituted a permissible “fair use” of that material freeing Google from copyright liability. In the proceedings below, the Federal Circuit held that the copied lines are copyrightable.
[Show full text]
Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority Meeting Council Chambers, City Hall, 104 S
MINUTES OF CLAREMORE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 104 S. MUSKOGEE, CLAREMORE, OKLAHOMA MARCH 03, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order by Mayor Brant Shallenburger at 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Nan Pope called roll. The following were: Present: Brant Shallenburger, Buddy Robertson, Tony Mullenger, Flo Guthrie, Mick Webber, Terry Chase, Tom Lehman, Paula Watson Absent: Don Myers Staff Present: City Manager Troy Powell, Nan Pope, Serena Kauk, Matt Mueller, Randy Elliott, Cassie Sowers, Phil Stowell, Steve Lett, Daryl Golbek, Joe Kays, Gene Edwards, Tim Miller, Tamryn Cluck, Mark Dowler Pledge of Allegiance by all. Invocation by James Graham, Verdigris United Methodist Church. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman that the agenda for the regular CPWA meeting of March 03, 2008, be approved as written. 8 yes, Mullenger, Lehman, Robertson, Guthrie, Shallenburger, Webber, Chase, Watson. ITEMS UNFORESEEN AT THE TIME AGENDA WAS POSTED None CALL TO THE PUBLIC None CURRENT BUSINESS Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman to approve the following consent items: (a) Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority meeting on February 18, 2008, as printed. (b) All claims as printed. (c) Approve budget supplement for upgrading the electric distribution system and adding an additional Substation for the new Oklahoma Plaza Development - $586,985 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (d) Approve budget supplement for purchase of an additional concrete control house for new Substation #5 for Oklahoma Plaza Development - $93,946 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (e) Approve budget supplement for electrical engineering contract with Ledbetter, Corner and Associates for engineering design phase for Substation #5 - Oklahoma Plaza Development - $198,488 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment.
[Show full text]
Volunteer Pilot Handbook
VOLUNTEER PILOT HANDBOOK As an AFC Pilot YOU are “Giving Hope Wings” to children and adults in need. The Mission of Angel Flight Central “Serving people in need by arranging charitable flights for access to health care and for other humanitarian purposes.” May 2012 INSPIRATION ! Volunteer pilots have said that the “opportunity to give back to those less fortunate”, “the joy of helping others” and the “reward of flying for a worthy cause” are some of the reasons why they volunteer to fly on behalf of Angel Flight Central. As you meet passengers, pilots and friends of AFC; be sure to capture your own stories and share them with us. Here’s some inspiration to get you started! Volunteer Pilots Give Hope & Help to Families AFC Serves Disaster Response “Mark would not have seen his daughter ”I just thought everybody forgot about us. th get married, celebrated our 11 wedding Then suddenly there was a plane and a pilot th anniversary, or celebrated his 49 flying us here to be with my mom.” birthday without your service. I will never forget all of the wonderful pilots Hurricane Katrina Survivor, AFC Passenger Danielle and flights we made with you. Your pilots and ground angels really are Angels! Thank you, thank you so much.” Marilyn, wife of AFC Passenger Volunteer Pilots Give their Time, Talent & Treasure Pilots help Special Needs Campers “A diagnosis of a rare form of liver with Flights cancer rocked our world… when I began to feel I no longer could continue “AFC is an outstanding organization to to make my trips to the Mayo Clinic work with and the level of their God sent angel flight.
[Show full text]
Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA
Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA Matthew Barrett Metro Transportation Research Library, Archive & Public Records - metro.net/library Transportation Research Library & Archive • Originally the library of the Los • Transportation research library for Angeles Railway (1895-1945), employees, consultants, students, and intended to serve as both academics, other government public outreach and an agencies and the general public. employee resource. • Partner of the National • Repository of federally funded Transportation Library, member of transportation research starting Transportation Knowledge in 1971. Networks, and affiliate of the National Academies’ Transportation • Began computer cataloging into Research Board (TRB). OCLC’s World Catalog using Library of Congress Subject • Largest transit operator-owned Headings and honoring library, forth largest transportation interlibrary loan requests from library collection after U.C. outside institutions in 1978. Berkeley, Northwestern University and the U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. • Archive of Los Angeles transit history from 1873-present. • Member of Getty/USC’s L.A. as Subject forum. Accessing the Library • Online: metro.net/library – Library Catalog librarycat.metro.net – Daily aggregated transportation news headlines: headlines.metroprimaryresources.info – Highlights of current and historical documents in our collection: metroprimaryresources.info – Photos: flickr.com/metrolibraryarchive – Film/Video: youtube/metrolibrarian – Social Media: facebook, twitter, tumblr, google+,
[Show full text]
Vergara V. State of California: a Political Analysis and Implications for Principal Practice
Vergara v. State of California: A Political Analysis and Implications for Principal Practice This manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and endorsed by the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration as a significant contribution to the scholarship and practice of school administration and K-12 education. Lolita A. Tabron Texas A&M University Beverly J. Irby Texas A&M University This political analysis uses the Vergara case as an example of how principals can be dynamic leaders who are well prepared for and engaged in their political terrain. This will be important to decrease judicial dependency and legislative interference to better ensure that reform begins with those closest to the problem. NCPEA Education Leadership Review, Vol. 16, No. 1– April, 2015 ISSN: 1532-0723 © 2015 National Council of Professors of Educational Administration 31 Introduction Public schools have moved at a glacial pace to reform the existing system to one that is responsive to a nation whose students have become increasingly more diverse (Cohen, Moffitt, & Goldin, 2007; Plank & Davis, 2010). Indeed, it seems the public education system has insulated itself and become reluctant to change. At least four waves of education reform have been directed towards the United States public education system with little change in performance gaps among racially diverse students (Boyd, 2010; Gay, 2009). As a result, third party criticisms (businesses, teacher unions, taxpayers) have created a space for the government to intervene (Plank & Davis). The 2012 the Vergara v. State of California case became a prime example of how a tug of war between political actors led to government intervention.
[Show full text]
VOLT Owner's Manual
19_CHEV_VOLT_COV_en_US_84044803A_2018JUN22.ai 1 6/14/2018 10:17:33 AM 2019 VOLT C M Y CM MY CY CMY VOLT K Owner’s Manual 84044803 A Chevrolet VOLT Owner Manual (GMNA-Localizing-U.S./Canada/Mexico- 12163007) - 2019 - crc - 6/11/18 Contents Introduction . 2 In Brief . 5 Keys, Doors, and Windows . 30 Seats and Restraints . 52 Storage . 99 Instruments and Controls . 102 Lighting . 143 Infotainment System . 150 Climate Controls . 151 Driving and Operating . 158 Vehicle Care . 236 Service and Maintenance . 321 Technical Data . 334 Customer Information . 337 Reporting Safety Defects . 348 OnStar . 351 Connected Services . 359 Index . 363 Chevrolet VOLT Owner Manual (GMNA-Localizing-U.S./Canada/Mexico- 12163007) - 2019 - crc - 6/11/18 2 Introduction Introduction This manual describes features that Helm, Incorporated may or may not be on the vehicle Attention: Customer Service because of optional equipment that 47911 Halyard Drive was not purchased on the vehicle, Plymouth, MI 48170 model variants, country USA specifications, features/applications that may not be available in your Using this Manual region, or changes subsequent to To quickly locate information about the printing of this owner’s manual. the vehicle, use the Index in the The names, logos, emblems, Refer to the purchase back of the manual. It is an slogans, vehicle model names, and documentation relating to your alphabetical list of what is in the vehicle body designs appearing in specific vehicle to confirm the manual and the page number where this manual including, but not limited features. it can be found. to, GM, the GM logo, CHEVROLET, the CHEVROLET Emblem, VOLT, Keep this manual in the vehicle for and the VOLT logo are trademarks quick reference.
[Show full text]
The Neighborly Substation the Neighborly Substation Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE CENTER FORTHE RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Hope Cohen 2008 er B ecem D THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design Hope Cohen Deputy Director Center for Rethinking Development Manhattan Institute In 1879, the remarkable thing about Edison’s new lightbulb was that it didn’t burst into flames as soon as it was lit. That disposed of the first key problem of the electrical age: how to confine and tame electricity to the point where it could be usefully integrated into offices, homes, and every corner of daily life. Edison then designed and built six twenty-seven-ton, hundred-kilowatt “Jumbo” Engine-Driven Dynamos, deployed them in lower Manhattan, and the rest is history. “We will make electric light so cheap,” Edison promised, “that only the rich will be able to burn candles.” There was more taming to come first, however. An electrical fire caused by faulty wiring seriously FOREWORD damaged the library at one of Edison’s early installations—J. P. Morgan’s Madison Avenue brownstone. Fast-forward to the massive blackout of August 2003. Batteries and standby generators kicked in to keep trading alive on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. But the Amex failed to open—it had backup generators for the trading-floor computers but depended on Consolidated Edison to cool them, so that they wouldn’t melt into puddles of silicon. Banks kept their ATM-control computers running at their central offices, but most of the ATMs themselves went dead. Cell-phone service deteriorated fast, because soaring call volumes quickly drained the cell- tower backup batteries.
[Show full text]
Vermont Public Transit Policy Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. ES-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ ES-1 Vermont’s Existing Transit System ................................................................................................................. ES-1 Critical Themes and Challenges ....................................................................................................................... ES-1 Needs Assessment ............................................................................................................................................. ES-2 Policy Plan Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... ES-3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Role of the PTPP ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Current State Policy .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Role of the Human Service Transportation Coordination Plan
[Show full text]
Virginia State Infrastructure Report (January 1, 2019 – December 31, 2019)
2019 Virginia State Infrastructure Report (January 1, 2019 – December 31, 2019) May 2020 (updated July 2020) This report reflects information for the portion of Virginia within the PJM service territory. www.pjm.com | Public PJM©2020 Table of Contents 1. Planning • Generation Portfolio Analysis • Transmission Analysis • Load Forecast 2. Markets • Market Analysis 3. Operations • Emissions Data www.pjm.com | Public 2 PJM©2020 Executive Summary (May 2020) • Existing Capacity: Natural gas represents approximately 49.1 percent of the total installed capacity in the Virginia service territory while coal represents approximately 12.4 percent. In PJM natural gas and coal account respectively for 42.4 and 28.7 percent of total installed capacity. • Interconnection Requests: Solar represents 57.1 percent of new interconnection requests in Virginia, while natural gas represents approximately 29.4 percent of new requests. • Deactivations: 1,397.8 MW in Virginia gave notification of deactivation in 2019. • RTEP 2019: Virginia’s 2019 RTEP projects total approximately $1.4 billion in investment. Approximately 23.6 percent of that represents supplemental projects. These investment figures only represent RTEP projects that cost at least $5 million. www.pjm.com | Public 3 PJM©2020 Executive Summary (May 2020) • Load Forecast: Virginia’s load is projected to grow between 0.7 and 1.4 percent annually over the next ten years. Comparatively, the overall PJM RTO projected load growth rate is 0.6 percent. • 2022/23 Capacity Market: No Base Residual Auction was conducted in 2019. For the most recent auction results, please see the 2018 Virginia State Infrastructure Report. • 1/1/19 – 12/31/19 Market Performance: Virginia’s average hourly LMPs were slightly higher than PJM average hourly LMPs.
[Show full text]
Connecting Altera 3.3-V PCI Devices to a 5-V PCI Bus
Connecting Altera 3.3-V PCI devices to a 5-V PCI Bus February 2004, Version 1.0 Application Note 330 Introduction Since its introduction in 1992, PCI Local Bus has become the most widely implemented expansion bus standard in the world. The PCI Local Bus is a high performance 32-bit or 64-bit bus with multiplexed address and data lines. The bus is intended for use as an interconnect mechanism between peripheral controller components, peripheral add-in cards, and processor/memory systems. The PCI Local Bus Specification, Rev. 2.3, specifies both the 3.3 V and 5 V signaling requirements although 5 V only keyed cards are not allowed. With ever shrinking process technologies and associated voltages, it is becoming difficult for silicon suppliers to support 5 V signaling requirements. Altera's Stratix™, Stratix II, Stratix GX and Cyclone™ devices support the 3.3 V PCI signaling requirements. This application note describes how to connect Altera's 3.3 V PCI devices to a 5 V PCI bus by using bus switches. The application note addresses the following topics: ■ Bus switches overview ■ Implementation ■ PCI considerations. Bus Switches Each bus switch consists of an N channel MOS transistor driven by a Overview CMOS logic gate, as shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Bus Switch Block Diagram Input/Output Output/Input Vg On/Off 0V/VCC Altera Corporation 1 AN-330-1.0 Preliminary Implementation The switch is enabled when the gate-to-source voltage (Vg) exceeds 1 V. As the input voltage rises, the resistance of the switch also rises and the output voltage also rises.
[Show full text]