DOCSLIB.ORG

James Hutton a Theory of the Earth Mike Leeder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Hutton a Theory of the Earth Mike Leeder INFERENCE / Vol. 6, No. 1 James Hutton A Theory of the Earth Mike Leeder ames hutton was a chemist, geologist, agricul- and there became a hands-on landlord who developed the turist, and prominent member of the Edinburgh land by applying the latest techniques in agriculture and intelligentsia during the height of the Scottish landscaping. JEnlightenment. His contemporaries and friends included From the mid-1760s, Hutton lived with his sisters in Robert Adam, David Hume, Adam Smith, Dugald Stewart, central Edinburgh and threw himself into the city’s scien- and James Watt. Hutton’s major work, Theory of the Earth, tific and philosophical life. Over the next twenty years, he published first in 1788 and expanded in 1794, describes gained enough field experience to have a detailed under- his geological observations and resulting theory for the standing of the basic geology of Scotland, England, and cycling of the earth.1 His conclusion was startling: “We Wales, and so established himself as the premier Scottish find no vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end.”2 It geological philosopher. His practice of geology gained was a unique perspective among seventeenth- and eigh- breadth and substance through his love of chemistry, exten- teenth-century scientific efforts, expressed freely and sive surveys of the French scientific literature, and a close without regard for any scriptural constraints. Hutton’s friendship with the prolific chemist Joseph Black. It was ideas are easily recognizable in today’s understanding of Black who discovered the latent heat of steam, invented the deep time and the geodynamic cycling of the earth by plate eighteenth century’s most precise analytical balance, and tectonics. Like a Lazarus taxon, which disappears from discovered carbon dioxide, a product of animal respira- the fossil record and resurfaces later, his notion of a recy- tion and organic fermentation. He also produced aqueous cling earth was born from scientific endeavor in the Age of precipitates of calcium carbonate and investigated silica Enlightenment and resurrected in the nuclear age. precipitation from Icelandic geyser waters. he major sources for what is known of Hutton’s n initial version of Theory of the Earth was life and work come courtesy of his friend and read to the Royal Society of Edinburgh on two biographer James Playfair, as well as seventeen occasions in 1785, the first by Black when Hutton Tpreserved items of personal correspondence.3 Hutton was Awas ill, and the second by Hutton himself. Organized in born in 1726 in Edinburgh of prosperous merchant stock. four parts, the work was published three years later in the His father and elder brother died when he was young, debut volume of the Transactions of the Royal Society of and he and his sisters were raised by their mother. At the Edinburgh. University of Edinburgh, he followed the mathematics The intellectual method in Hutton’s magnum opus lectures of Isaac Newton’s protégé Colin Maclaurin and was influenced by his fieldwork, agricultural experience, studied humanities and medicine. Hutton never practiced and deism. He worked from a deductive hypothesis that the latter, but its study was the best route to pursue his the planet’s machinelike workings had been envisaged interest in chemistry. From 1747, he continued his stud- by a benevolent and canny creator who parried destruc- ies at the Universities of Paris and Leiden, and graduated tive mountain denudation by constructive processes of from Leiden with a medical degree in 1749. Returning renewal involving sedimentation, consolidation, and uplift. to Edinburgh, he set up with a friend in the profitable Hutton made detailed observations on the nature of rocks, manufacture of sal ammoniac, a salt used for dyeing and minerals, and fossils and their arrangement in the geolog- metalworking, using chimney soot as raw material. He ical record. But his observations on fossils were nugatory then made a radical change in life direction. In the early beyond their being indicative of former marine conditions 1750s, he took a two-year stint on a Norfolk farm where he during stratal deposition; nonetheless he became known learned advanced agricultural practices. He took charge of as “the famous fossil philosopher,” as Watt referred to him two family farms in Berwickshire in the Scottish Borders in a letter of 1774.4 1 / 6 BIOGRAPHIES In his view of the planet as machinelike—a word used His theory depended upon a number of assumptions: five times in his first nine paragraphs—Hutton estab- creation without scripture and myth; a benevolent and lished links with contemporary industrial steam-powered forward-looking creator; and linked, steady processes machines and particularly the role of heat to drive them. of destruction, consolidation, and replenishment.14 Of He posited that, like any machine, the planet must have course, some Christians rejected his theory out of hand on had a designer who knew how best to attain a certain pur- the basis of its first assumption. pose: in this case, the creation of a habitable and renewable Hutton proposed that eroded land is replenished by a surface world. “consolidating operation” that involves the hardening of Regarding the deeper earth, he claimed a general igno- loose sediment and fossil remains on and below the ocean rance: “We know little of the earth’s internal parts, or of floor: the materials which compose it at any considerable depth below the surface.”5 During Hutton’s time, a good deal more The loose materials that had subsided [deposited] from was known about the earth’s subsurface than he acknowl- water, should be formed into masses of the most perfect edged; Georges-Louis Leclerc, the comte de Buffon, solidity, having neither water nor vacuity between their devoted a whole appendix in his Les Époques de la Nature various constituent parts, nor in the pores of those constit- to measurements of ambient temperature in deep mines.6 uent parts themselves.15 Hutton focused instead upon the earth’s surface, where “the more inert matter [i.e., rock] is replenished with He considered two possible chemical reasons as to plants, and with animals and intellectual beings.”7 This why strata may become consolidated: “either by aqueous replenishment came courtesy of soil formed from the solution and crystallization, or by the effect of heat and breakdown of solid rock. But there was a problem, since fusion.”16 He regarded the former as impossible: “this soil is necessarily washed away, by the continual cir- culation of the water, running from the summits of the There must be made to pass through those porous masses, mountains towards the [ocean].”8 Hutton realized that the water impregnated with some other substances in a dis- end result would be the gradual elimination of global relief solved state; and the aqueous menstruum must be made to and the transfer of all land into the oceans. These observa- separate from the dissolved substances, and to deposit the tions on soil erosion were not new; they had been made as same in those cavities through which the solution moves.17 far back as Homer and Plato.9 Hutton invited readers But he found no reason to object to the efficacy of heat to examine the globe; to see if there be, in the constitution and fusion in consolidation. Soft sediment will compact by of the world, a reproductive operation, by which a ruined compression and constitution may be again repaired, and a duration or sta- bility thus procured to the machine.10 by the fusion of their substance; and foreign matter may be introduced into the open structure of strata, in form of He found evidence that the earth maintained a form of steam or exhalation, as well as in the fluid state of fusion stability. “In examining things present,” he wrote, [i.e., as melt].18 we have data from which to reason with regard to what has He ascribed various features to melting, notably sili- been; and, from what has actually been, we have data for ceous and clay ironstone concretions, the arrangement of concluding with regard to that which is to happen here- crystals in metallic ore veins, and concentrically arranged after … upon the supposition that the operations of nature stratification of rock salt. are equable and steady.11 Inductive logic was required to arrive at these conclu- sions, and while it served him well on some occasions, his Hutton believed that the traces of the past bear witness overzealous eliminative induction severely constrained to times “extremely remote” compared to the ancestry of him at others and left him with only a few possible mech- humanity recorded in the scriptures. His examination of anisms by which to explain matters.19 In this way, he ruled fossils indicated that the expanse of historical time was vast: out the real causa for aqueous precipitation: sediment pore waters were static and unmovable at and under the It is thus that, in finding the relics of sea-animals of every ocean floor. He also rejected the ability of water to either kind in the solid body of our earth, a natural history of those dissolve or precipitate natural crystalline substances that animals is formed, which includes a certain portion of time.12 might consolidate loose sediment by cementation, like calcareous, siliceous, bituminous, sulfidic, and ferrugi- For estimating this portion of time, Hutton recom- nous minerals. Likewise, he ignored the consequences of mended making “recourse to the regular operations of the mechanical compaction and Buffon’s observations that the world” and by calculations based on those.13 earth’s ambient temperature increases with depth.20 The 2 / 6 INFERENCE / Vol. 6, No. 1 huge influxes of water into many mines seem not to have processes worked so “that the destruction of one continent persuaded him of the efficacy of deep, warm, aqueous flow is not brought about without the renovation of the earth in through rock masses.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hutton, Kelvin, and the Great Earth Debates. • the Beginnings of Modern Geology “All Natural Processes That Affect the Earth’S Crust (Erosion, Deposition, • Ca
    Chapter 1 The Science of Geology An Introduction to Geology • Geology - the science that pursues an understanding of planet Earth • Physical geology - examines the materials composing Earth and seeks to understand the many processes that operate beneath and upon its surface • Historical geology - seeks an understanding of the origin of “If there is an interesting place you want to go, there is Earth and its development interesting geology that you can study there” through time Mersin ophiolite, (Cappadocia, Central Turkey). Turkey The Science of Geology The Science of Geology 1.3: satellite image of Mt. Vesuvius, Italy. • Some historical views • Geology, people, and the environment of the Earth • Many important relationships exist between • Aristotle, 300 BC; people and the natural environment • James Ussher, ca. 1600, ‘Earth was created in Problems and issues 4004 BC;’ addressed by • Catastrophism geology include • Earth’s features formed through • Natural hazards, sudden and violent resources, world changes. ‘The Dog population growth, of and environmental Pompeii’ issues Dwelling in Goreme, Cappadocia The Science of Geology Hutton, Kelvin, and the great Earth debates. • The beginnings of modern geology “All natural processes that affect the Earth’s crust (erosion, deposition, • ca. 1780, James Huton’s volcanic eruptions, faulting, glaciation Theory of the Earth; etc.) operate with the same intensity • Uniformitarianism: “the and under the same set of physical processes that operate constraints now as in the geologic past.” today have operated in “(as to the age of Earth) we see no the past.” vestige of a beginning, no prospect of • a uniformitarian view of an end.” Earth requires a vast These points are incorrect - why? amount of time….
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Revolution: Deep Time and the Age of the Earth
    Lecture 6: The Geological Revolution: Deep Time and the Age of the Earth Astronomy 141 – Winter 2012 This lecture explores the geological revolution that revealed the antiquity of the Earth. Understanding the age of the Earth requires having a conception of a beginning for the Earth. Historical and Physical age estimates give different answers. Geological discoveries uncovered the deep history of the Earth, and developed techniques for reading that history. The Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 Billion Years old, measured by radiometric age dating of meteorites, the oldest Earth rocks, and Moon rocks. In order for “what is the age of the Earth?” to make sense, you must conceive of a beginning. Two ways people have conceived of time: Cyclical Time: Earth has no beginning or end, only repeated cycles of birth, death, and rebirth/renewal. Linear Time: Earth has a past beginning & will have a future end. On human scales, time appears to be cyclical Natural cycles around us: Cycle of day & night Monthly cycle of moon phases Yearly cycle of the seasons Generational cycle of birth, life, and death... Examples: Hinduism & Buddhism posit cyclical time Plato’s 72,000 year cycle: 36,000 Golden Age followed by a 36,000 age of disorder & chaos. Linear Time posits a definite beginning in the past, and an eventual ending in the future. Judaism provides an example of linear time: Past divine creation of the Earth (Genesis) Promised end of times. Christianity & Islam adopted this idea: See history as fulfillment, not growth. No change in the world, except decay from past perfection (“fall from grace”).
    [Show full text]
  • Catastrophism and Uniformitarianism: Logical Roots and Current Relevance in Geology
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Catastrophism and uniformitarianism" logical roots and current relevance in geology VICTOR R. BAKER Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0011, USA Abstract, Catastrophism in the Earth sciences is rooted in the view that Earth signifies its causative processes via landforms, structures and rock. Processes of types, rates and magnitudes not presently in evidence may well be signified this way. Uniformitarianism, in contrast, is a regulative stipulation motivated by the presumed necessity that science achieves logical validity in what can be said (hypothesized) about the Earth. Regulative principles, including simplicity, actualism and gradualism, are imposed a priori to insure valid inductive reasoning. This distinction lies at the heart of the catastrophist versus uniformitarian debates in the early nine- teenth century and it continues to influence portions of the current scientific program. Uniform- itarianism, as introduced by Charles Lyell in 1830, is specifically tied to an early nineteenth century view of inductive inference. Catastrophism involves a completely different form of inference in which hypotheses are generated retroductively. This latter form of logical inference remains relevant to modern science, while the outmoded notions of induction that warranted the doctrine of uniformitarianism were long ago shown to be overly restrictive in scientific practice. The latter should be relegated solely to historical interest in the progress of ideas. On 4 July 1997, the Mars Pathfinder spacecraft Antarctic ice, was interpreted as showing various made a highly successful landing in the Ares Vallis indicators of possible relic biogenic activity region of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Hutton's Uniformitarianism
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 4 1-1-1983 Hutton's Uniformitarianism Jess R. Bushman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Bushman, Jess R. (1983) "Hutton's Uniformitarianism," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol23/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Bushman: Hutton's Uniformitarianism huttonssuttonsHuttons uniformitarianism jess R bushman uniformitarianism or cause and effect is a very important and basic concept in geology the heart of the concept is that there is order and regularity in the operation or functioning of natural laws this consistency is what gives significance to cause and effect pat- terns what we see happening today helps us to identify the results of natural processes which were active millions of years ago we observe ripple marks being formed by wave action on beaches today when we see similar ripple marks in ancient sandstone we use cause and effect or uniformitarianism to suggest that the ripple marked sandstones were once part of an ancient beach the geologist as he studies natural processes at work and sees how long it takes to produce soil from solid rock or for a glacier to carve a U shaped valley is convinced
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the History of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology: an Introduction
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 Contributions to the history of geomorphology and Quaternary geology: an introduction DAVID R. OLDROYD1 & RODNEY H. GRAPES2 1School of History and Philosophy, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 136-701, Korea (e-mail: [email protected]) This Special Publication deals with various aspects the Baltic States in 2006, where a great deal of of the histories of geomorphology and Quaternary what the geologist sees consists of Quaternary geology in different parts of the world. Geomor- sediments. However, much of the Earth’s surface phology is the study of landforms and the processes is not formed of these sediments but of older that shape them, past and present. Quaternary rocks exposed at the surface by erosion and struc- geology studies the sediments and associated tural displacement. Here, geomorphology can seek materials that have come to mantle much of answers to questions regarding the past histories of Earth’s surface during the relatively recent Pleisto- these rocks, their subsequent erosion, and present cene and Holocene epochs. Geomorphology, with location and form. Geomorphology also raises its concern for Earth’s surface features and pro- questions, and may provide answers, regarding tec- cesses, deals with information that is much more tonic issues, for example from deformed marine amenable to observation and measurement than is terraces and offset fault systems. In all these the case for most geological work. Quaternary instances, the history of geological and geomor- geology focuses mostly, but not exclusively, on phological investigations can serve to illustrate the Earth’s surficial sedimentary cover, which is both the progress and pitfalls involved in the scien- usually more accessible than the harder rocks of tific understanding of the Earth’s surface and the deeper past.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Lyell: the Man Who Unlocked the Earth's Sprawling History
    GENERAL ARTICLE Charles Lyell: The Man Who Unlocked the Earth’s Sprawling History∗ C P Rajendran Charles Lyell, born in 1797, and Scottish by birth was one among the last generation of British polymaths who contributed much to the development of geology as a scientific discipline. He laid the foundation of modern geology and outlined his geological vision supported by global examples in a treatise called the Principles of Geology. This book that became pop- ular with the scholars and the reading public inspired many contemporary researchers, most prominently Charles Dar- C P Rajendran is an Earth win to think in new ways about the evolutionary pathways scientist with special interests of the Earth and its constituents. Lyell, a heretical thinker in geodynamics, earthquake in geology in his time was given due recognition by the es- geology, seismology and tablishment as he was knighted in 1848 and made a baronet. tectonics. His lasting legacy lies in providing scientific underpinnings to the study of Earth’s history, centered on the foundational principle of uniformitarianism that views all the geological features of the Earth’s surface as a product formed in a grad- ualistic manner, mediated through deep time. And, that the geologic processes acted in the same manner and intensity in the past as they do in the present, summarized in a maxim: “the present is the key to the past”. Early Life and Career Bill Bryson in his book A Short History of Nearly Everything Keywords says geology excited the 19th century Europe in a way no science Lyell, geology, uniformitarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Age of the Earth
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Celebrating the age of the Earth SIMON J. KNELL 1 & CHERRY L. E. LEWIS 2 1 Department of Museum Studies, 105 Princess Road East, Leicester LE1 7LG, UK (email: sjk8 @leicester.ac.uk) 2History of Geology Group, 21 Fowler Street, Macclesfield, Cheshire SKIO 2AN, UK (email: [email protected]) Abstract: The age of the Earth has been a subject of intellectual interest for many centuries, even millennia. Of the early estimates, Archbishop Ussher's famous calculation of 4004 BC for the date of Creation represents one of the shortest time periods ever assigned to the Earth's age, but by the seventeenth century many naturalists were sceptical of such chronologies. In the eighteenth century it was Nature that provided the record for Hutton and others. But not all observers of geology enquired about time. Many, like William Smith, simply earned a living from their practical knowledge of it, although his nephew, John Phillips, was one of the first geologists to attempt a numerical age for the Earth from the depositional rates of sediments. For more than fifty years variations of that method prevailed as geology's main tool for dating the Earth, while the physicists constrained requirements for a long timescale with ever more rigorous, and declining, estimates of a cooling Sun and Earth. In 1896 the advent of radioactivity provided the means by which the Earth's age would at last be accurately documented, although it took another sixty years. Since that time ever more sophisticated chronological techniques have contributed to a search for the oldest rocks, the start of life, and human evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Development of Concept of Uniformitarianism, Catastrophism and Neptunism
    History of development of concept of Uniformitarianism, Catastrophism and Neptunism Dr. Surendra Kumar Uniformitarianism “Current geological processes are the same as those at work in the past” ✓ Uniformitarianism is a theory based on the work of James Hutton and made popular by Charles Lyell in the 19th century. This theory states that the forces and processes observable at earth’s surface are the same that have shaped earth’s landscape throughout natural history. ✓ The earth sculpting processes alluded to above are the processes of erosion, deposition, compaction and uplift. Although these processes are constant, they occur at extremely slow rates. ✓ As a farmer, Hutton realized that the rates of erosion were so slow that it would take an inconceivable amount of time to observe drastic changes in Earth’s landscape. ✓ The theory also states that these processes have occurred at constant rates throughout natural history. James Hutton explains this idea in his book entitled Theory of the Earth, “… we find no vestige of a beginning – no prospect of an end.” Hutton was the first scientist to conclude that the age of the Earth must be so incredibly old that the mind can’t begin to estimate its length. ✓ Charles Lyell even went to the Paris Basin to observe the rocks responsible for catastrophism, a theory in direct opposition with uniformitarianism. Based on catastrophism, the forces shaping the earth are not constant. However, when Lyell observed the mass extinction events in the fossil succession of the Paris Basin, he drew a very different conclusion. ✓ Lyell recognized that cyclical depositional environments and reoccurring extinctions show that there are controls that cause these processes to be recurrent.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Abandons Uniformitarianism?
    Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale Science and Mathematics Conference Papers School of Science and Mathematics 12-2017 What a Catastrophe!― Science Abandons Uniformitarianism? Lynden Rogers Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/sci_math_conferences Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Rogers, L. (2017). What a Catastrophe!― Science Abandons Uniformitarianism?. In L. Rogers (Ed.), The Biblical Flood: The Context and History of Seventh-day Adventist Understanding. Paper presented at Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, 9-10 September (pp. 137-180). Cooranbong, Australia: Avondale Academic Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Science and Mathematics at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Science and Mathematics Conference Papers by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 137 Chapter 5 What a Catastrophe!― Science Abandons Uniformitarianism? Lynden J. Rogers Introduction: the Uniformitarian Accusation Over the last century it has been frequently claimed by defenders of a traditional reading of Genesis that one of the main reasons why scientists are blind to data supporting a world-wide Noachian Flood is because geology is philosophically uniformitarian. By this it is implied that geologists regard the present as the only reliable key to the past and in order to explain geological history will invoke only those very slow, gradual processes which can be observed in operation today. While this accusation was voiced in the late nineteenth century it was not until 1902 that the young George McCready Price levelled this charge in recognisably scientific form.1 The argument changed very little over the next 70 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planet We Live On: the Beginnings of the Earth Sciences
    Basic Books in Science Book 6 The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences Chris King BASIC BOOKS IN SCIENCE { a Series of books that start at the beginning Book 6 The planet we live on - the beginnings of the Earth Sciences Chris King Professor of Earth Science Education, Keele University, Keele (UK) Edited by: Roy McWeeny Professore Emerito di Chimica Teorica, Universit`adi Pisa, Pisa (Italy) Books in the Series will be available {free of charge{from the websites <www.paricenter.com> (see `Basic Books in Science') <www.learndev.org> (see `For the Love of Science') BASIC BOOKS IN SCIENCE { a Series of books that start at the beginning Acknowledgements In a world increasingly driven by information technology and market forces, no educational experiment can expect to make a significant impact without the availability of effective bridges to the `user community' { the students and their teachers. In the case of \Basic Books in Science" (for brevity, \the Series"), these bridges have been provided as a result of the enthusiasm and good will of Dr. David Peat (The Pari Center for New Learning), who first offered to host the Series on his website, and of Dr. Jan Visser (The Learning Development Institute), who set up a parallel channel for further development of the project with the use of Distance Learning techniques. The credit for setting up and maintaining the bridgeheads, and for promoting the project in general, must go entirely to them. Education is a global enterprise with no boundaries and, as such, is sure to meet linguistic difficulties: these will be ameliorated by the provision of translations into some of the world's more widely used languages.
    [Show full text]
  • James Hutton 1726-1797
    LITERACY RESOURCE James Hutton 1726-1797 Famous for: • Establishing geology as a true science • Formulating his controversial ‘Theory of the Earth’ • Developing a theory of rain • Being the first person to think of the • Earth as millions of years old. Farmer and naturalist James Hutton is credited with being the founder of modern geology. The first to determine that the Earth is millions of years old, Hutton believed our planet is continually being formed. James Hutton (1726-1797) Early years and education James Hutton was born in Edinburgh in 1726. He went on to study medicine and chemistry at Edinburgh University, and in Paris and Leiden. He took his degree in 1749. In 1750 he returned to Edinburgh and resumed chemical experiments with friend James Davie. Their work on the production of sal ammoniac – a salt used for dying and working with brass and tin – led to a profitable partnership. The science of geology Hutton moved to Slighhouses, a lowland family farm, in the 1750s. He spent 14 years running the farm. This gave him an interest in how land changed with the forces of wind and rain. In 1753 Hutton became interested in studying the surface of the earth. He went on to devote his scientific knowledge, powers of observation and philosophical mind to the newly-named subject of ‘geology’. Hutton went on a geological tour of the north of Scotland with George Maxwell-Clerk in 1764. He let his farms to tenants in 1768 and returned to Edinburgh. Between 1767 and 1774 he was closely involved with the construction of the Forth and Clyde canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Geology Lyell And
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 24, 2014 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Lyell and the Principles of Geology M. J. S. Rudwick Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1998, v.143; p1-15. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.143.01.02 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2014 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 24, 2014 Part 1. The life and influence of Lyeil For geology, Lyell proved to be the right man at the right time in the right place. He grew up in comfortable surroundings, encouraged by his parents to develop a keen observation of the natural world around him. He learned the importance of geological observations in the field and the precise and accurate recording of geological information, which led him to travel extensively across Europe and North America to examine a wide range of geological phenomena. The knowledge and ideas that he gained from field observations and the work of fellow geologists were clearly the foundations for his great work Principles of Geology. In the first paper of this book, Martin Rudwick analyses Principles of Geology through successive editions as a dynamic development of geology 'as one long argument'. Lyell, more than anyone, established geology as a scientific discipline, hence the word 'Principles' in the title of his book, and gave it credibility both amongst practitioners of the subject and, equally importantly, amongst the wider, literate public.
    [Show full text]