DOCSLIB.ORG

Contributions to the History of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology: an Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contributions to the History of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology: an Introduction Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 Contributions to the history of geomorphology and Quaternary geology: an introduction DAVID R. OLDROYD1 & RODNEY H. GRAPES2 1School of History and Philosophy, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 136-701, Korea (e-mail: [email protected]) This Special Publication deals with various aspects the Baltic States in 2006, where a great deal of of the histories of geomorphology and Quaternary what the geologist sees consists of Quaternary geology in different parts of the world. Geomor- sediments. However, much of the Earth’s surface phology is the study of landforms and the processes is not formed of these sediments but of older that shape them, past and present. Quaternary rocks exposed at the surface by erosion and struc- geology studies the sediments and associated tural displacement. Here, geomorphology can seek materials that have come to mantle much of answers to questions regarding the past histories of Earth’s surface during the relatively recent Pleisto- these rocks, their subsequent erosion, and present cene and Holocene epochs. Geomorphology, with location and form. Geomorphology also raises its concern for Earth’s surface features and pro- questions, and may provide answers, regarding tec- cesses, deals with information that is much more tonic issues, for example from deformed marine amenable to observation and measurement than is terraces and offset fault systems. In all these the case for most geological work. Quaternary instances, the history of geological and geomor- geology focuses mostly, but not exclusively, on phological investigations can serve to illustrate the Earth’s surficial sedimentary cover, which is both the progress and pitfalls involved in the scien- usually more accessible than the harder rocks of tific understanding of the Earth’s surface and the deeper past. recent geological history. Institutionally, geomorphology is usually There are relatively few books but a growing situated alongside, or within, academic departments number of research papers on the history of geo- of geology or geography. In most English-speaking morphology. For readers of English, there is a countries, its links are more likely to be with short book by Tinkler (1985) and a collection geography; but in the United States these connec- edited by the same writer (Tinkler 1989), an ele- tions are usually shared between geography and gantly written volume on British geomorphology geology, although rarely in the same institution. In from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century by leading institutions everywhere, strong links exist Davies (1969), and a series of essays by Kennedy between geomorphology and such cognate disci- (2006). But towering over all other writings are plines as soil science, hydrology, oceanography three volumes: those by Chorley et al. (1964) on and civil engineering. Although nominally part of geomorphology up to the time of the American, geology, Quaternary geology also has strong links William Morris Davis (1850–1934); by Chorley with geography and with those disciplines, such as et al. (1973) dealing exclusively with Davis; and climatology, botany, zoology and archaeology, by Beckinsale & Chorley (1991) on some aspects concerned with environmental change through the of work after Davis. As envisaged by Chorley relatively recent past. and Beckinsale, who died in 2002 and 1999, Given that geomorphology concerns the study respectively, a fourth volume by other authors is of the Earth’s surface (i.e. landforms, and their soon to emerge (Burt et al. 2008). A series of origin, evolution and the processes that shape essays edited by Stoddart (1997) on Process and them) and that the uppermost strata are in many Form in Geomorphology (1997) also contains cases of Pleistocene and Holocene age, it is unsur- valuable historical material, while papers edited prising that this Special Publication should deal by Walker & Grabau (1993) discuss the develop- ‘promiscuously’ with topics in both geomorphol- ment of geomorphology in different countries, of ogy and Quaternary studies. This particular selec- which Australia, China, Estonia, Iceland, Japan, tion has been developed from a nucleus of papers Lithuania, New Zealand, The Netherlands, the presented at a conference on the histories of USA and the USSR are specifically mentioned in geomorphology and Quaternary geology held in the present volume. From:GRAPES, R. H., OLDROYD,D.&GRIGELIS, A. (eds) History of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 301, 1–17. DOI: 10.1144/SP301.1 0305-8719/08/$15.00 # The Geological Society of London 2008. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 2 D. R. OLDROYD & R. H. GRAPES A framework for geomorphology uplift, landforms shaped by rivers pass through different stages of development, which he dubbed Connections between geomorphology and geology ‘youth’, ‘maturity’ and ‘old age’, until they are go back to the early days of Earth science, but it reduced to a nearly level surface or ‘peneplain’. is to developments in the later eighteenth century The peneplain, for which he found evidence in the that we often attribute the foundations of modern Appalachians, could later be ‘rejuvenated’ by links between the disciplines, notably to scholars uplift, thereby initiating a new cycle of erosion. such as Giovanni Targioni-Tarzetti (1712–1783) This model led to studies of ‘denudation chronol- in Italy, Jean-Etienne Guettard (1715–1786) in ogy’, or the reconstruction of landscape histories France, Mikhail Lomonosov (1711–1765) in based of the recognition of erosion cycles and pene- Russia and James Hutton (1726–1797) in Scotland. plains in various stages of development. Without a Hutton gave much thought to extended Earth time, clear understanding of the processes and time and to the processes whereby soil and rock are involved, however, ‘reading a landscape’ through eroded from the land to the sea. In 1802, Hutton’s the lens of Davisian doctrine, or elucidating its friend and biographer, John Playfair (1748–1810), ‘denudation chronology’, became an art form, not only rescued Hutton’s ideas from relative rather than a rigorous science. Davis’s geomorphic obscurity but contributed original ideas on the model was essentially qualitative and difficult to nature and behaviour of river systems. However, test but, as Charles Darwin famously wrote the intellectual climate of the time worked against regarding his notion of natural selection, ‘here the ready acceptance of their views. then I had at last a theory by which to work’ Following the leads provided by Hutton and (Darwin 1887, p. 83). Playfair, Charles Lyell (1797–1875) also addressed Davis’s ideas were challenged in his own time, questions of extended Earth time and of erosion in particularly by German geomorphologists such as his well-known and influential three-volume trea- Albrecht Penck (1858–1945), Professor of Physical tise Principles of Geology (Lyell 1830–1833). He Geography at the University of Vienna and later of emphasized the differential erosive powers that Geography at Berlin, and more particularly his son rivers or the sea could have on strata of different Walther Penck (1888–1923). Before the World hardness, and discussed cases where river systems War I, the Pencks and Davis were on good terms, did not divide simply, like the branches of a tree, but they subsequently drifted apart, partly owing but cut through higher ground or occupied the to world politics and partly owing to Walther’s eroded axes of anticlines. The latter phenomenon rejection of the idealized character of Davis’s could be explained by supposing that folding had theory along with disagreements as to the relation- fractured the rocks at an anticlinal crest so that ship between Earth movements and erosion. The they became more prone to erosion, with the Pencks objected to the notion of discrete upward result that ‘reversal’ of drainage might occur. But Earth movements as the cause of topographic reju- Lyell realized that most of the rivers draining the venation and also argued that erosion wears back a Weald of SE England did not follow the main surface just as much as down. However, Walther axis of the Wealden anticline but often cut Penck’s proposed model of slope retreat would through the North or South Downs that formed eventually yield a gently sloping surface resembling the flanks of the fold. He attributed such anomalous a Davisian peneplain (Penck 1924, 1953). Penck configurations to fractures that cut across the also envisaged an empirical relationship between Wealden axis and to the interaction of Earth move- tectonic activity and slope development, owing to ments and fluvial erosion. Thus, Lyell invoked geo- the changing rates of river incision as the land morphological and tectonic considerations in order itself was raised at varying rates. This idea was to develop a geological history of a region. rejected vigorously by some in the English- A name that often emerges in the present collec- speaking community, with Douglas Johnson tion of papers is that of W.M. Davis, with his theory (1878–1944), for example, describing it as ‘one of a cycle of erosion that was constructed in part on of the most fantastic ideas ever introduced into the work of his compatriots John Wesley Powell geomorphology’! (Johnson 1940, p. 231). (1834–1902), Clarence Edward Dutton (1841– Ultimately, the differences between Davis and 1912) and Grove Karl Gilbert (1843–1918) Penck lay in their different objectives and scientific (Davis 1889, 1899, 1912). And one may reiterate approaches. Davis regarded geomorphology as a that Davis’s work was considered by Chorley branch of geography, with geomorphic processes et al. (1973) to be so influential as to warrant an furnishing the topography upon which geography entire volume of their comprehensive historical ‘resided’. He, together with a number of like- study of geomorphology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1350-5 Geologist
    POSITION DESCRIPTION 1. Position Number 2. Explanation (show any positions replaced) 3. Reason for Submission New Redescription Reestablishment Standardized PD Other 4. Service 5. Subject to Identical Addition (IA) Action HQ Field Yes (multiple use) No (single incumbent) 6. Position Specifications 7. Financial Statement Required 10. Position Sensitivity and Risk Designation Subject to Random Drug Testing Yes No Executive Personnel-OGE-278 Non-Sensitive Employment and Financial Interest-OGE-450 Non-Sensitive: Low-Risk Subject to Medical Standards/Surveillance Yes No None required Public Trust Telework Suitable Yes No 8. Miscellaneous 9. Full Performance Level Non-Sensitive: Moderate-Risk Fire Position Yes No Functional Code: -- Pay Plan: Non-Sensitive: High-Risk Law Enforcement Position Yes No BUS: - - Grade: National Security 11. Position is 12. Position Status Noncritical-Sensitive: Moderate-Risk Competitive SES Noncritical-Sensitive: High-Risk 2-Supervisory Excepted (specify in remarks) SL/ST Critical-Sensitive: High-Risk 4-Supervisor (CSRA) 13. Duty Station Special Sensitive: High-Risk 5-Management Official 6-Leader: Type I 14. Employing Office Location 15. Fair Labor Standards Act Exempt Nonexempt 7-Leader: Type II 16. Cybersecurity Code 17. Competitive Area Code: 8-Non-Supervisory #1: #2: - - #3: - - Competitive Level Code: 18. Classified/Graded by Official Title of Position Pay Plan Occupational Code Grade Initial Date a. Department, Bureau, or Office b. Second Level Review -- -- 19. Organizational Title of Position (if different from, or in addition to, official title) 20. Name of Employee (if vacant, specify) 21. Department, Agency, or Establishment c. Third Subdivision U.S. Department of the Interior a. Bureau/First Subdivision d.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Geology
    FEBRUARY 2007 PRIMEFACT 563 (REPLACES MINFACT 60) History of geology Mineral Resources Early humans needed a knowledge of simple geology to enable them to select the most suitable rock types both for axe-heads and knives and for the ornamental stones they used in worship. In the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, about 5000 to 2500 BC, flint was mined in the areas which are now Belgium, Sweden, France, Portugal and Britain. While Stone Age cultures persisted in Britain until after 2000 BC, in the Middle East people began to mine useful minerals such as iron ore, tin, clay, gold and copper as early as 4000 BC. Smelting techniques were developed to make the manufacture of metal tools possible. Copper was probably the earliest metal to be smelted, that is, extracted from its ore by melting. Copper is obtained easily by reducing the green copper carbonate mineral malachite, itself regarded as a precious stone. From 4000 BC on, the use of clay for brick-making became widespread. The Reverend William Branwhite Clarke (1798-1878), smelting of iron ore for making of tools and the ‘father’ of geology in New South Wales weapons began in Asia Minor at about 1300 BC but did not become common in Western Europe until Aristotle believed volcanic eruptions and nearly 500 BC. earthquakes were caused by violent winds escaping from the interior of the earth. Since earlier writers had ascribed these phenomena to The classical period supernatural causes, Aristotle's belief was a By recognising important surface processes at marked step forward. Eratosthenes, a librarian at work, the Greek, Arabic and Roman civilisations Alexandria at about 200 BC, made surprisingly contributed to the growth of knowledge about the accurate measurements of the circumference of earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • William Morris Davis Brief Life of a Pioneering Geomorphologist: 1850-1934 by Philip S
    VITA William Morris Davis Brief life of a pioneering geomorphologist: 1850-1934 by PhiliP S. Koch Naught looks the same for long… Waters rush on, make valleys where once stood plains; hills wash away to the sea. Marshland dries to sand, while dry land becomes stagnant, marshy pool. From Nature, springs erupt or are sealed; from earthquakes, streams burst forth or vanish. n Metamorphoses, the Roman poet Ovid, echoing Pythagoras, al- ludes to geomorphology: the study of the forms taken by the Iearth’s surface, and what causes them. Almost 19 centuries later, William Morris Davis, S.B. 1869, devised a clear, concise, descrip- tive, and idealized model of landscape evolution that revolutionized and in many ways created this field of study. Born into a prominent Philadelphia Quaker family, Davis studied geology and geography at Harvard’s Lawrence Scientific School and then joined a Harvard-sponsored geographic-exploration party to the Colorado Territory, led by the inaugural Sturgis-Hooper profes- sor of geology, Josiah Dwight Whitney. Wild stories had circulated since soon after the Louisiana Purchase about Rocky Mountain peaks 18,000 feet or higher. The Harvard expedition set out to investigate, and found none, but they did find “’14ers” (14,000-plus feet). Among these, the expedition members surveyed, named, and made two first- river valleys locally decrease the growing recorded summitings in the “Collegiate Peaks,” designating the tall- elevation differences between “uplands” est in the group Mount Harvard (honoring their sponsor), and the and “base-level” caused by uplift. In “Ma- second tallest Mount Yale (honoring Whitney’s alma mater).
    [Show full text]
  • Process-Form Models
    11 Process-form Models The interaction of process and landform is central to geomorphic investigations and a series of concepts have been associated with the models of landscape development suggested over the last century. Process investigations were enhanced by considering the way in which specific landscape features are related to processes, as illustrated by grade, characteristic angles, drainage density and river channel capacity. Technique developments, especially of cos- mogenic dating, have revitalised some earlier models. The complex response concept affords the reconciliation of alternative landscape histories, and a panoply of models is now becoming available offering opportunities to realize the objectives of the original qualitative approaches. Exogenic processes Microclimate and Local climate Regional climate Climatic zones meteorological events Short-term climatic change Medium-term climatic Long-term climatic Animal and plant activities Local vegetation change change (e.g. glacial– change (e.g. icehouse interglacial cycles) and hothouse states) Regional vegtation change Biological evolution Microscale landforms Mesoscale landforms Macroscale landforms Megascale landforms Area: <0.25 km2 Area: 0.25–100 km2 Area: 100–1,000,000 km2 Area: >1,000,000 km2 Lifespan: 10 years Lifespan: 1,000 years Lifespan: 10 million years Lifespan: >10 million years Exogenic examples: Fluvial Pools and riffles Meanders Large river floodplains Major drainage basins Glacial Small cirques Valley glaciers Ice caps Ice sheets and inland Aeolian Ripples
    [Show full text]
  • Hutton, Kelvin, and the Great Earth Debates. • the Beginnings of Modern Geology “All Natural Processes That Affect the Earth’S Crust (Erosion, Deposition, • Ca
    Chapter 1 The Science of Geology An Introduction to Geology • Geology - the science that pursues an understanding of planet Earth • Physical geology - examines the materials composing Earth and seeks to understand the many processes that operate beneath and upon its surface • Historical geology - seeks an understanding of the origin of “If there is an interesting place you want to go, there is Earth and its development interesting geology that you can study there” through time Mersin ophiolite, (Cappadocia, Central Turkey). Turkey The Science of Geology The Science of Geology 1.3: satellite image of Mt. Vesuvius, Italy. • Some historical views • Geology, people, and the environment of the Earth • Many important relationships exist between • Aristotle, 300 BC; people and the natural environment • James Ussher, ca. 1600, ‘Earth was created in Problems and issues 4004 BC;’ addressed by • Catastrophism geology include • Earth’s features formed through • Natural hazards, sudden and violent resources, world changes. ‘The Dog population growth, of and environmental Pompeii’ issues Dwelling in Goreme, Cappadocia The Science of Geology Hutton, Kelvin, and the great Earth debates. • The beginnings of modern geology “All natural processes that affect the Earth’s crust (erosion, deposition, • ca. 1780, James Huton’s volcanic eruptions, faulting, glaciation Theory of the Earth; etc.) operate with the same intensity • Uniformitarianism: “the and under the same set of physical processes that operate constraints now as in the geologic past.” today have operated in “(as to the age of Earth) we see no the past.” vestige of a beginning, no prospect of • a uniformitarian view of an end.” Earth requires a vast These points are incorrect - why? amount of time….
    [Show full text]
  • Related Skills, Values, and Qualities Common Interests of Geology
    Bachelor of Science: Geology Minor: Geology Geology is a broad interdisciplinary science that involves the study of Earth and its history. Geologists gather and interpret data about the Earth for the purpose of increasing our knowledge about natural resources and Earth processes. They provide basic information required for establishing policy for resource management and environmental protection. Geologists may explore for new mineral or oil resources, work on environmental problems, do research, or teach and often divide their time between work in the field, the laboratory, and the office. The Bachelor of Science in Geology program at KU was designed to prepare students with enough fundamental understanding of geology to succeed in graduate school, and to provide the practical field experience needed to succeed as career geologists. Course requirements parallel the subjects on the Professional Geologist licensing exam. Employers recommend one or more internships to be successful and competitive when entering this field. Career types associated with Geology Common interests of Geology majors (Is this a good fit for you? Are you…) • Visiting science museums, nature centers, or zoos Investigative - “Thinker” • Developing hobbies and collections related to soils, Realistic - “Doer” rocks, coins, or other artifacts Social - “Helper” • Hiking, mountain climbing, camping, backpacking and other outdoors activities • Exploring and traveling Related skills, values, and qualities • Playing games of strategy or putting together or • Proficiency in
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5.3 the Use of Erosion Pins in Geomorphology
    © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 4.0 License. ISSN 2047 - 0371 3.5.3 The use of erosion pins in geomorphology John Boardman1,2 and David Favis-Mortlock1 1Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford, UK ([email protected]) 2Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town, South Africa ABSTRACT: Erosion pins have been widely used in geomorphology since the 1950s to estimate rates of change (erosion and – less commonly – accumulation) in land surfaces. They may be used for short- and long-term surveys and are quick and easy to install and measure. Erosion pins are particularly suited to bare, undisturbed environments such as badlands and sand dunes. Our recommendations for their use follow those of Haigh (1977) and Lawler (1993) but we also discuss the need for researchers to be aware of issues which arise from of measurement error, particularly for short-term studies and analytical methods which rely on few pin measurements. There is also a not inconsiderable challenge involved in extrapolating results derived from erosion pin measurements to larger areas. KEYWORDS: badlands, erosion pins, erosion rates, measurement errors erosion pins is not necessary: useful data can Introduction be collected with occasional visits. The basic idea behind the use of erosion pins However, this simplicity is deceptive. to quantify land-surface change is very Considerations of pin siting, measurement straightforward. A rod is firmly fixed into the error, and interpretation of results rapidly ground (or other substrate), and a note made introduce additional complexity. Thus, any of the length of rod which remains exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    THEME: Americans at Work Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) SUBTHEME: " ence and Invention" UNITED STATES DEPART . .cNT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC William Morris Davis House AND/OR COMMON 17 Francis Street LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 17 Francis Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Cambridge VICINITY OF 8th STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Massachusetts 75 Middlesex 017 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT __PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM X_BUILDING(S) ^—PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL .^PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES. RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION X.NO —MILITARY —OTHER (OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Francis M. shea STREET & NUMBER 17 Francis Street CITY, TOWN STATE Cambridge _ VICINITY OF Massachusetts (LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. Middlesex Registry of Deeds Southern District REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC STREET & NUMBER 3rd and Ottis Streets CITY. TOWN STATE Cambridge Massachusetts REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None DATE — FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY __LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE x .^EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED ^.ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS _ALTERED _MOVED DATE- _FAIR (unrestored) _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The William Morris Davis House in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is a frame, 2h story gabled roof house with a gambreled roof wing. The exterior is sheathed in shingles. The main entrance is located on the side of the house and there is also a rear entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • 18Th Century Rural Architecture ROOTED in SWEDEN Guest Article
    no 8 2010-01 ROOTED IN SWEDEN Living in Swedeland USA 18th Century Rural Architecture Guest Article Emigration Conference | SwedGen Tour 2009 contents 18th Century Rural 3 Architecture - Skåne Emigration Conference - 7 “Letters to Sweden” Living in Swedeland USA 9 7 16 8 The Digital Race 13 Swedgen Tour 2009 14 Christmas as Celebrated 16 9 in my Childhood Swedish Genealogical 20 Society of Minnesota 3 firstly... …I would like to talk about the cur- rent status of genealogy. A while ago I spoke to a fellow genealogist who experiences problems in getting local government funding for genealogical societies and events. This person felt 20 that the cultural funding tended to fa- vour sports activities for the young, Along with genealogy comes inevita- ter at night long after the rest of the and that it might even be a question of bly a curiosity about how people lived family has gone to bed. At the same age discrimination since genealogy is and a general historical curiosity, not time it can be very social and also a regarded as an “old folks” activity. I about kings and queens and wars and team effort. You can save yourself a don’t know the full specifics or even revolutions, but about the little man. lot of work by connecting with other if this is the typical case, but I still To me, this history is equally excit- genealogists, by exchanging infor- felt like I had taken a blow to the sto- ing and more or less skipped during mation and tips of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Planning, and River Management in the United States: Some Historical Reflections
    Copyright © 2005 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Reuss, M. 2005. Ecology, planning, and river management in the United States: some historical reflections. Ecology and Society 10(1): 34. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art34/ Research, part of a Special Feature on Riverine Landscapes Ecology, Planning, and River Management in the United States: Some Historical Reflections Martin Reuss1 ABSTRACT. River ecologists are also river-basin planners. However, their role in planning has developed slowly over the decades since the beginning of the 20th century. Three major factors explain this phenomenon. First, ecologists focused on plant and animal communities rather than on broader policy issues related to land settlement and water development. Second, the federal government, and most state and local governments as well, used mainly economic criteria to justify projects. Intangible benefits, including the value of species or an aesthetically pleasing landscape, drew relatively little attention. Third, the public generally favored development, especially during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Only after World War II did the public's position shift in favor of more preservation, as ecologists developed the concept of the ecosystem, large dam projects forced basin inhabitants from their homes, and chemical and nuclear pollutants threatened the environment. Also, urbanization increased support for the preservation of recreation sites and of streams undisturbed by human intervention. Meanwhile, partly through important advances in geomorphology and hydrology, ecologists acquired new tools to understand the land-water relationship within river basins. Neverthless, benefit-cost analysis continued to dominate federal water- resources planning, and organizational culture and competing or overlapping bureaucracies hampered rational water resources administration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Revolution: Deep Time and the Age of the Earth
    Lecture 6: The Geological Revolution: Deep Time and the Age of the Earth Astronomy 141 – Winter 2012 This lecture explores the geological revolution that revealed the antiquity of the Earth. Understanding the age of the Earth requires having a conception of a beginning for the Earth. Historical and Physical age estimates give different answers. Geological discoveries uncovered the deep history of the Earth, and developed techniques for reading that history. The Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 Billion Years old, measured by radiometric age dating of meteorites, the oldest Earth rocks, and Moon rocks. In order for “what is the age of the Earth?” to make sense, you must conceive of a beginning. Two ways people have conceived of time: Cyclical Time: Earth has no beginning or end, only repeated cycles of birth, death, and rebirth/renewal. Linear Time: Earth has a past beginning & will have a future end. On human scales, time appears to be cyclical Natural cycles around us: Cycle of day & night Monthly cycle of moon phases Yearly cycle of the seasons Generational cycle of birth, life, and death... Examples: Hinduism & Buddhism posit cyclical time Plato’s 72,000 year cycle: 36,000 Golden Age followed by a 36,000 age of disorder & chaos. Linear Time posits a definite beginning in the past, and an eventual ending in the future. Judaism provides an example of linear time: Past divine creation of the Earth (Genesis) Promised end of times. Christianity & Islam adopted this idea: See history as fulfillment, not growth. No change in the world, except decay from past perfection (“fall from grace”).
    [Show full text]