DOCSLIB.ORG

Celebrating the Age of the Earth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Celebrating the Age of the Earth Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Celebrating the age of the Earth SIMON J. KNELL 1 & CHERRY L. E. LEWIS 2 1 Department of Museum Studies, 105 Princess Road East, Leicester LE1 7LG, UK (email: sjk8 @leicester.ac.uk) 2History of Geology Group, 21 Fowler Street, Macclesfield, Cheshire SKIO 2AN, UK (email: [email protected]) Abstract: The age of the Earth has been a subject of intellectual interest for many centuries, even millennia. Of the early estimates, Archbishop Ussher's famous calculation of 4004 BC for the date of Creation represents one of the shortest time periods ever assigned to the Earth's age, but by the seventeenth century many naturalists were sceptical of such chronologies. In the eighteenth century it was Nature that provided the record for Hutton and others. But not all observers of geology enquired about time. Many, like William Smith, simply earned a living from their practical knowledge of it, although his nephew, John Phillips, was one of the first geologists to attempt a numerical age for the Earth from the depositional rates of sediments. For more than fifty years variations of that method prevailed as geology's main tool for dating the Earth, while the physicists constrained requirements for a long timescale with ever more rigorous, and declining, estimates of a cooling Sun and Earth. In 1896 the advent of radioactivity provided the means by which the Earth's age would at last be accurately documented, although it took another sixty years. Since that time ever more sophisticated chronological techniques have contributed to a search for the oldest rocks, the start of life, and human evolution. In the attempt to identify those landmarks, and others, we have greatly progressed our understanding about the processes that shape our planet and the Universe, although in doing so we discover that the now-accepted age of the Earth is but a 'geochemical accident' which remains a contentious issue. Establishing the Earth's age and chronology has combined with the wide adoption of uniformi- been something of an intellectual baton passed tarianism, gave the sacience new and seemingly from one academic creed to another as each rational ways to think about time. But the new seemed to offer new hope of solution or under- geologists were often reticent about discussing standing. In the seventeenth century the Earth's time in terms of years. By the 1860s, however, the age was subject to the strictures of religious and subject added the great evolutionary debate to its social orthodoxy. The product of Creation, intellectual baggage as T. H. Huxley defended theological study offered one logical path to its Darwin's billion-year estimate for natural selec- understanding, but also to its containment. This tion. Now both biologists and geologists joined pattern would repeat itself, as forces for an forces to demand a longer timescale which per- expanded timescale repeatedly did battle with mitted the playing out of those evolutionary and those who thought the Earth relatively young. uniformitarian processes necessary to explain the This was never simply a conflict between 'pro- condition of the Earth. gressive' science and a resistant society, but However, the age of the Earth had acquired a rather a reflection of the path travelled by an new interest group. Applying theoretical ideas idea through a complexity of beliefs, dogmas, developed in the arly years of the century, a theories, measurements and methodologies. number of respected physicists began to offer In the eighteenth century, Theories of the hope of at last calculating the Earth's age in Earth marshalled existing evidence, scientific years. But if their calculations were correct, then practice and analogy, to construct models for those great underpinning theories of the natural the origin and development of the planet. At the sciences could not be. With the discovery of beginning of the nineteenth century, modern radioactivity in 1896, the future of the Earth's geology emerged as a rigorous and empirical age was firmly in the court of that emerging inter- field of study then centred on stratigraphy with disciplinary subgroup, the geophysicists. In the its implied notions of relative age. This, when twentieth century these extended the timescale From: LEwis, C. L. E. & KNELL, S. J. (eds). The Age of the Earth: from 4004BC to aB 2002. Geolog- ical Society, London, Special Publications, 190, 1-14. 0305-8719/01/$15.00 © The Geological Society of London 2001. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 2 S. J. KNELL & C. L. E. LEWIS remarkably. With Einstein's general relativity also from arithmetic, geometry, and trigono- field equations, the topic was also returning to metry, both plain and spherical; and like- cosmology, to explanations of the Earth's age in wise from a studious and laboured application the context of the age of the universe, to the realm of various sources of information, supplied of astronomers. by the observation of eclipses, by the testi- What unifies these different approaches and monies of credible authors, and by ancient their practitioners is their extrapolation of time medals, coins, monuments and inscriptions from the study of process, whether that process (Anon. 1819). was observable or modelled by theory. Early chronologers rigorously applied contemporary Chronologies were constructed as an analytical historiographic methods to chart the 'progress' tool so as to distinguish 'cause' and realize a of history. Later geologists would extrapolate 'chain of events' (Anon. 1837, p. 131). To achieve the time necessary for shaping the surface of the this, their content was selective and thematic. Earth or for the deposition or erosion of observ- To discern the age of the Earth, the only 'cred- able strata. Biologists too envisaged a time- ible authors' were those relating creation stories. dependent process of evolution. Physicists made The Bible, or rather the texts from which it was predictions and measurements from the physics written, then became the primary historical of heat and radioactive decay, and astronomers texts, key sources for the interpretation of deduced process from planetary construction time. Historians generally point to Theophilus and arrangement. In the relative calm of the of Antioch, of the second century AD, as perhaps early twenty-first century, in a field which has the first to use the Biblical record as a source seen centuries of deep controversy, we should for the construction of a chronology. The art of perhaps reflect upon the confidence our pre- chronology, however, extended back long before decessors had in their age for the Earth. They the Christian era, often deriving 'fabulous ages' too thought they had 'got it right'. of hundreds of thousands of years for particular civilizations (Anon. 1819, 1833, 1849). In the sixth century BC Zoroaster, a religious teacher Chronologies and theories who lived in Persia (now Iran), believed that the world had been in existence for over 12000 In one of his popular articles, Stephen Jay years; the Roman writer Cicero relates that the Gould (1993, pp. 181-193) responded to James venerable priesthood of Chaldea in ancient Barr's (1985) definitive study of a great histor- Babylonia held the belief that the Earth emerged ical chronologer with a diatribe against previous from chaos two million years ago, while the old 'Whiggish' interpretations of this early form of Brahmins of India regarded Time and the Earth scholarship. The historiography of science had as eternal (Holmes 1913). long rejected the notion of 'progress', of the past By the sixteenth century the Bible formed a having been a succession of errors, but Gould core resource for the writing of histories in was here talking to scientists who necessarily Europe. Of particular significance was the remained wedded to, and driven by, this con- interpretation of the Second Letter of Simon cept of progress towards 'truth'. Though not Peter, which states 'One day is with the Lord as the first to do so, Barr saw chronologers not a thousand years, and a thousand years as one as religious dogmatists but as rigorous scholars day' (2 Peter 3:8) (see also Dean 1981a; Oldroyd working within the social and intellectual 1996a). It draws on Psalm 90 of the Old constraints of their time. They were partici- Testament, 'The human condition': 'Lord ... pating in the earliest of historiographic prac- To you, a thousand years are a single day'. tices- the construction of a linear timeline of Chronologers read this literally, and made events - which, in reconceived form, would later each of the six days of creation equivalent to underpin the great stratigraphic enterprise of the 1000 years. The Biblical motivation for discuss- nineteenth century. ing the Earth's limited age was to encourage the Rees's early-nineteenth-century Cyclopaedia living of 'saintly lives'. For here was not simply separated 'sacred chronology' from other histor- the birth but also the death of the Earth, the ical chronologies. Here chronology was 'one of Judgement Day, which will 'come like a thief, the eyes of history' and not simply the study and then with a roar the sky will vanish, the of ancient theological texts. Its potential sources elements catch fire and fall apart, and the Earth were many: and all it contains will be burnt up' (2 Peter As its use is extensive, the difficulty of acquir- 3:10). If this were not enough to encourage ing it is not inconsiderable. It derives necessary piety, Psalm 90 also pondered human mortality, assistance from astronomy and geography, 'over in a trice, and then we are gone.' Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 AGES OF THE EARTH 3 became very familiar to early-nineteenth-century British audiences, but he had predecessors and contemporaries across Europe (Anon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hutton, Kelvin, and the Great Earth Debates. • the Beginnings of Modern Geology “All Natural Processes That Affect the Earth’S Crust (Erosion, Deposition, • Ca
    Chapter 1 The Science of Geology An Introduction to Geology • Geology - the science that pursues an understanding of planet Earth • Physical geology - examines the materials composing Earth and seeks to understand the many processes that operate beneath and upon its surface • Historical geology - seeks an understanding of the origin of “If there is an interesting place you want to go, there is Earth and its development interesting geology that you can study there” through time Mersin ophiolite, (Cappadocia, Central Turkey). Turkey The Science of Geology The Science of Geology 1.3: satellite image of Mt. Vesuvius, Italy. • Some historical views • Geology, people, and the environment of the Earth • Many important relationships exist between • Aristotle, 300 BC; people and the natural environment • James Ussher, ca. 1600, ‘Earth was created in Problems and issues 4004 BC;’ addressed by • Catastrophism geology include • Earth’s features formed through • Natural hazards, sudden and violent resources, world changes. ‘The Dog population growth, of and environmental Pompeii’ issues Dwelling in Goreme, Cappadocia The Science of Geology Hutton, Kelvin, and the great Earth debates. • The beginnings of modern geology “All natural processes that affect the Earth’s crust (erosion, deposition, • ca. 1780, James Huton’s volcanic eruptions, faulting, glaciation Theory of the Earth; etc.) operate with the same intensity • Uniformitarianism: “the and under the same set of physical processes that operate constraints now as in the geologic past.” today have operated in “(as to the age of Earth) we see no the past.” vestige of a beginning, no prospect of • a uniformitarian view of an end.” Earth requires a vast These points are incorrect - why? amount of time….
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Graphic Innovations of Geologist Henry T
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Uncovering strata: an investigation into the graphic innovations of geologist Henry T. De la Beche Renee M. Clary Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Clary, Renee M., "Uncovering strata: an investigation into the graphic innovations of geologist Henry T. De la Beche" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 127. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/127 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. UNCOVERING STRATA: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE GRAPHIC INNOVATIONS OF GEOLOGIST HENRY T. DE LA BECHE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Curriculum and Instruction by Renee M. Clary B.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1983 M.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1997 M.Ed., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1998 May 2003 Copyright 2003 Renee M. Clary All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments Photographs of the archived documents held in the National Museum of Wales are provided by the museum, and are reproduced with permission. I send a sincere thank you to Mr. Tom Sharpe, Curator, who offered his time and assistance during the research trip to Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Case Study 25
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Brief Description of item(s) 294 manuscript notebooks of the geologist Sir Charles Lyell (1797-1875). In two series: 263 numbered notebooks, 1825-1874, on geology, natural history, social and political subjects; 31 additional notebooks, 1818-1871, with indices. Mostly octavo format. For details see Appendix 1. In good condition. 2. Context The nineteenth century saw public debate about how to conduct science reach new heights. Charles Lyell was a pivotal figure in the establishment of geology as a scientific discipline; he also transformed ideas about the relationship between human history and the history of the earth. Above all, he revealed the significance of ‘deep time’. At a time when the Anglican church dominated intellectual culture, geology was a controversial subject. Lyell played a significant part in separating the practice of science from that of religion. Through his major work, The Principles of Geology, he developed the method later adopted by Darwin for his studies into evolution. Lyell observed natural phenomena at first hand to infer their underlying causes, which he used to interpret the phenomena of the past. The method stressed not only a vast geological timescale, but also the ability of small changes to produce, eventually, large ones. The Principles combined natural history, theology, political economy, anthropology, travel, and geography. It was an immediate success, in Britain, Europe, North America and Australia. Scientists, theologians, leading authors, explorers, artists, and an increasingly educated public read and discussed it. Lyell’s inductive method strongly influenced the generation of naturalists after Darwin. Over the rest of his life, Lyell revised the Principles in the light of new research and his own changing ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Revolution: Deep Time and the Age of the Earth
    Lecture 6: The Geological Revolution: Deep Time and the Age of the Earth Astronomy 141 – Winter 2012 This lecture explores the geological revolution that revealed the antiquity of the Earth. Understanding the age of the Earth requires having a conception of a beginning for the Earth. Historical and Physical age estimates give different answers. Geological discoveries uncovered the deep history of the Earth, and developed techniques for reading that history. The Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 Billion Years old, measured by radiometric age dating of meteorites, the oldest Earth rocks, and Moon rocks. In order for “what is the age of the Earth?” to make sense, you must conceive of a beginning. Two ways people have conceived of time: Cyclical Time: Earth has no beginning or end, only repeated cycles of birth, death, and rebirth/renewal. Linear Time: Earth has a past beginning & will have a future end. On human scales, time appears to be cyclical Natural cycles around us: Cycle of day & night Monthly cycle of moon phases Yearly cycle of the seasons Generational cycle of birth, life, and death... Examples: Hinduism & Buddhism posit cyclical time Plato’s 72,000 year cycle: 36,000 Golden Age followed by a 36,000 age of disorder & chaos. Linear Time posits a definite beginning in the past, and an eventual ending in the future. Judaism provides an example of linear time: Past divine creation of the Earth (Genesis) Promised end of times. Christianity & Islam adopted this idea: See history as fulfillment, not growth. No change in the world, except decay from past perfection (“fall from grace”).
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted Thesis (PDF, 12Mb)
    Victorian Egyptology and the Making of a Colonial Field Science, 1850 – 1906 by Meira Gold Wolfson College Department of History and Philosophy of Science This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date of Submission: December 2019 Declaration This thesis is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my thesis has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the History and Philosophy of Science Degree Committee. Abstract Victorian Egyptology and the Making of a Colonial Field Science, 1850-1906 Meira Gold This dissertation provides a new account of the origins of archaeological fieldwork in the Nile Delta. It considers how practitioners from diverse disciplinary backgrounds circulated knowledge about the built environment of pharaonic ruins: monuments, architecture, burials, and soil mounds that remained in situ. I trace the development of Egyptology from an activity that could be practiced long-distance through a network of informants to one that required first-hand field experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Catastrophism and Uniformitarianism: Logical Roots and Current Relevance in Geology
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Catastrophism and uniformitarianism" logical roots and current relevance in geology VICTOR R. BAKER Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0011, USA Abstract, Catastrophism in the Earth sciences is rooted in the view that Earth signifies its causative processes via landforms, structures and rock. Processes of types, rates and magnitudes not presently in evidence may well be signified this way. Uniformitarianism, in contrast, is a regulative stipulation motivated by the presumed necessity that science achieves logical validity in what can be said (hypothesized) about the Earth. Regulative principles, including simplicity, actualism and gradualism, are imposed a priori to insure valid inductive reasoning. This distinction lies at the heart of the catastrophist versus uniformitarian debates in the early nine- teenth century and it continues to influence portions of the current scientific program. Uniform- itarianism, as introduced by Charles Lyell in 1830, is specifically tied to an early nineteenth century view of inductive inference. Catastrophism involves a completely different form of inference in which hypotheses are generated retroductively. This latter form of logical inference remains relevant to modern science, while the outmoded notions of induction that warranted the doctrine of uniformitarianism were long ago shown to be overly restrictive in scientific practice. The latter should be relegated solely to historical interest in the progress of ideas. On 4 July 1997, the Mars Pathfinder spacecraft Antarctic ice, was interpreted as showing various made a highly successful landing in the Ares Vallis indicators of possible relic biogenic activity region of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Horner: a Portrait of an Inspector of Factories
    BERNICE MARTIN LEONARD HORNER: A PORTRAIT OF AN INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES Leonard Horner was the most impressive and influential of the first English factory inspectors. For 26 years from 1833 to 1859 he adminis- tered the Factory Act mainly in the textile district of Lancashire. His work and that of his colleagues in the Factory Department made a success of this major experiment in legislative intervention in industry and despite the gloomy predictions of their early opponents they did not ruin the British economy in the process. The first generation of Inspectors laid the foundation for successive extensions of the Factory Act so that by the end of the 19th century working conditions and hours of labour for women and children were under legal regulation in all the major branches of manufacturing industry. Horner was ac- knowledged by his contemporaries to be the major figure among the early Inspectors; he even had the singular honour of being praised by Marx in Capital. This short biography will concentrate on Horner's work as Inspector of Factories since this is undoubtedly his major achievement. However it will also be concerned with other aspects of his life and interests, both because these have some importance in their own right and also in order to examine the extent to which Horner's life and thought form a coherent whole. Finally, an assessment will be made of Horner's place in social reform and in the development of English economic and social policy in the 19th century. I HORNER'S EARLY LIFE AND CAREER1 Leonard Horner was born in Edinburgh in 1785.
    [Show full text]
  • Hutton's Uniformitarianism
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 4 1-1-1983 Hutton's Uniformitarianism Jess R. Bushman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Bushman, Jess R. (1983) "Hutton's Uniformitarianism," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol23/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Bushman: Hutton's Uniformitarianism huttonssuttonsHuttons uniformitarianism jess R bushman uniformitarianism or cause and effect is a very important and basic concept in geology the heart of the concept is that there is order and regularity in the operation or functioning of natural laws this consistency is what gives significance to cause and effect pat- terns what we see happening today helps us to identify the results of natural processes which were active millions of years ago we observe ripple marks being formed by wave action on beaches today when we see similar ripple marks in ancient sandstone we use cause and effect or uniformitarianism to suggest that the ripple marked sandstones were once part of an ancient beach the geologist as he studies natural processes at work and sees how long it takes to produce soil from solid rock or for a glacier to carve a U shaped valley is convinced
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Horner in Bonn and Liu Tungsheng in Beijing Tic
    Open Geosci. 2018; 10:925–931 Research Article Ian Smalley* and Slobodan B. Markovic An enthusiasm for loess: Leonard Horner in Bonn and Liu Tungsheng in Beijing https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0073 tic. Liu followed determinedly in these footsteps; a great Received Jan 10, 2018; accepted Dec 18, 2018 scholar, and a great enthusiast. Loess scholarship needs careful and precise investigation Abstract: Liu Tungsheng featured on the list of twelve no- and reporting but it also needs a broad sweep of enthusi- table loess investigators prepared for the great LoessFest asm, an appreciation of loess for the extraordinary mate- meeting, held in Heidelberg and Bonn in 1999. He fully de- rial that it is. served his position on this list of eminent loess scholars; in fact it might be argued that his was the major contri- Keywords: Loess, loess investigation, loess enthusiasm, bution. His contribution was a true paradigm shift in the Leonard Horner, Liu Tungsheng world of loess investigation. Obruchev and Richthofen had produced an earlier paradigm shift when they propagated the idea that loess deposits form by aeolian deposition- a “The thick silt sediment in North China deposited by the wind paradigm shift away from the earlier Lyellian idea of la- during the dry period of the Quaternary period is unique in many custrine or fluvial deposition. But that was a fairly simple aspects. Its great thickness, wide distribution, complex develop- ment history, rich fossil contents and the characteristic topogra- shift, a tweak of the sedimentological event structure. Liu, phy it shows make it unequalled as compared with the loess de- and his co-workers in China, produced a new vision, a new posits in other parts of the world.” way of looking at loess, not so much a paradigm shift as a Liu & Chang 1964 p.523 [12] paradigm enlargement.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin and John Herschel*
    432 South African Journal of Science 105, November/December 2009 Research Articles Charles Darwin and John Herschel* B. Warner The influence of John Herschel on the philosophical thoughts of Charles Darwin, both through the former’s book, Natural Philosophy, and through their meeting in 1836 at the Cape of Good Hope, is discussed. With Herschel having himself speculated on evolution just a few months before he met Darwin, it is probable that he stimulated at least the beginnings of the latter’s lifelong work on the subject. : evolution, Cape of Good Hope, Charles Darwin, John Herschel He never talked much, but every word which he uttered was worth listening to. Charles Darwin, about Sir John Herschel His Majesty’s Ship Beagle, commanded by Captain Robert Fitz- Roy and carrying Charles Robert Darwin as the naturalist on board, arrived in Simon’s Bay on 31 May 1836 on the final stage of a voyage around the world that had taken four and a half years and had still another six months to go. One of FitzRoy’s duties was to check the accuracy of 22 marine chronometers, destined for use by the Royal Navy; the presence of the Royal Observatory in Cape Town gave him the finest opportunity to carry this out, with the result that the Beagle stayed in port for Charles Darwin as a young man.Watercolour by George Richmond, after the return 18 days—longer than at any other port during the circumnaviga- of the Beagle. tion (they stayed for five weeks in the Galapagos, but island- hopped).
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Charles Lyell, Bart., M.A., D.C.L., Ll.D., P.K.B., P.L.S., V.P
    142 Obituary—Sir Charles Lyell. OBITTTABT. SIR CHARLES LYELL, BART., M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., P.K.B., P.L.S., V.P. OEOL. SOC. LOND. ON Monday, 22nd February, at his residence in Harley Street, and in his seventy-eighth year, Sir Charles Lyell passed peacefully from amongst us, after a long life of scientific labour, to his honoured rest. To the outside world it may seem strange that the death of a man who was neither statesman, soldier, nor public orator, should arouse our sympathies so strongly, or that he should be so highly esteemed all over the world; but geologists know well what Lyell has done for them since he published the first volume of " The Principles of Geology " in 1830. It is in the character of historian and philosophical expo- nent of geological thought that Lyell has achieved so much for our science; nor can we fail to remember that those clear and advanced views, for which he became so justly celebrated, were advocated by him forty-five years ago, at a time when scientific thought was still greatly trammelled by a strong religious bias, and men did not dare to openly avow their belief in geological discoveries nor accept the only deductions which could be drawn from them. It was no small service which Lyell rendered to us when he publicly maintained that, in reasoning on geological data, it was impossible to restrict geologists to the limits of the Mosaic cosmogony, or to adopt for the past ages of geological time the chronology of Archdeacon Ussher.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    THE QUARTERLY OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDO5 EDITED BY THE ASSISTANT-SECRETARY OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME THE FOURTEENTH. 1858. PART THE FIRST. PROCEEDINGS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. LONDON LONGMAN, BKOWN, GREEN, LONGMANS, AND ROBERTS. PARIS :--FRIED. KLINCKSIECK, 11 RUE DE LILLE; BAUDRY, 9 RUE DU COQ, PRES LE LOUVRE ; LEIPZIG, T. O. 'WEIGEL. SOLD AL~O AT THE APARTMENTS OF THE SOCIETY. MDCCCLVIII. OF THE OFFICERS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. Elected February 19, 1858. Professor John Phillips, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S. i~fc~re~f~mt~. John J. Bigsby, M.D. Hugh Falconer, M.D., F.R.S. Leonard Horner, Esq., F.R.S.L. & E. Sir R. I. Murchison, G.C.St.S,, F.R.S. & L.S. ~r Thomas Davidson, Esq., F.R.S. Warington W. Smyth, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. ~oreign ~creta~. WiUiam John Hamilton, Esq., F.R.S. grea~urrr. Joseph Prestwieh, Esq., F.R.S. John J. Bigsby, M.D. Prof. N. S. Maskelyne, M.A. W. J. Broderip, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. & L.S. John C. Moore, Esq., M.A., F.R.S. Prof. Charles Daubeny, M.D., F.R.S. & L.S. Sir R. I. Murchison, G.C.St.S., F.R.S. & Thomas Davidson, Esq., F.R.S. L.S. Hugh Falconer, M.D., F.R.S. Robert W. Mylne, Esq. Thomas F. Gibson, Esq. Prof. John Phillips, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S. R. A. Godwin-Austen, Esq., B.A., F.R.S. Major-General Portlock, LL.D., F.R.S.
    [Show full text]