Chitwan, Jutpani, Shatikhor, Rasauli
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne Mclean Charles Sturt University (Australia)
HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 19 Number 2 Himalayan Research Bulletin; Special Article 8 Topic: The Tharu 1999 Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne McLean Charles Sturt University (Australia) Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation McLean, Joanne (1999) "Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal," HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies: Vol. 19 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol19/iss2/8 This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conservation and the linpact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne McLean Charles Sturt University (Australia) Since the establishment of the first national park in the United States in the nineteenth century, indig enous peoples have been forced to move from regions designated as parks. Some of these people have been relocated to other areas by the government, more often they have been told to leave the area and are given no alternatives (Clay, 1985:2). Introduction (Guneratne 1994; Skar 1999). The Thant are often de scribed as one people. However, many subgroups exist: The relocation of indigenous people from national Kochjla Tharu in the eastern Tarai, Chitwaniya and Desauri parks has become standard practice in developing coun in the central Tarai, and Kathariya, Dangaura and Rana tries with little regard for the impacts it imposes on a Tharu in the western Tarai (Meyer & Deuel, 1999). -
A Yellow-Throated Marten Martes Flavigula Carrying a Small Indian Civet Viverricula Indica
A Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula carrying a Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica Babu Ram LAMICHHANE1*, Chiranjibi Prasad POKHERAL1, Ambika Prasad KHATIWADA1, Rama MISHRA2 and Naresh SUBEDI1 Abstract Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula has a wide geographic distribution, but little is known about its ecology and behaviour. A camera-trap survey in and around Chitwan National Park, Nepal, photographed a solitary Marten carrying a Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica. The animal was in a grassland patch amid Sal Shorea robusta forest. It is unclear whether the Marten killed the Civet. Recent camera-trap surveys suggest that Yellow-throated Marten is widespread in Chitwan NP with records from altitudes of 190–675 m; many records are from Sal forest. Keywords: camera-trap, Chitwan National Park, behaviour, distribution, intra-guild carnivore predation, locality records, Nepal, Sal forest मऱसाप्रोऱे सानो ननरबिराऱो आहाराको 셁पमा 쥍याईरहेको बौगोलरक वितयणऺेत्र ठू रो बएताऩनन भरसाप्रोको आननफानीको फायेभा थोयैभात्र जानाकायी यहेको छ। मसि셍ष (२०७० सारभा) 啍माभया ट्रमावऩङ प्रविधधको प्रमोग गयी गरयएको सिेऺणको क्रभभा सारिनरे घेरयएको घाॉसे भैदान ऺेत्रभा भरसाप्रोरेए啍रै एउटा िम�क ननयबफयारो 쥍माईयहेको पोटो खिचेको धथमो। पोटोको आधायभा भात्र उ啍त भरसाप्रोरे ननयबफयारो भायेको हो कक होईन एककन गनष सककएन। मसैगयी ऩनछ쥍रा केही ि셍षभा गरयएका 啍माभेया ट्रमावऩङ सिेऺणको क्रभभा धचतिनको धेयैजसो ऺत्रे भा भरसाप्रोरे विचयण गने गयेको य १९० देखि ६७५ लभटय स륍भको उचाईभा ऩाईएको धथमो। भरसाप्रोको पोटो खिधचएका धेयैजसो ठाउॉ सारिन ऺत्रे भा ऩदषछन।् Introduction riverine and mixed hardwood), 12% grassland, 5% exposed surface and 3% water bodies (Thapa 2011). -
Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future. -
2 Chitwan District: Asset Baseline
Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 44168-012 Capacity Development Technical Assistance (CDTA) October 2013 Nepal: Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development (Financed by the Strategic Climate Fund) District Baseline Reports: Department of Water Supply and Sewerage (DWSS) – Urban Watsan Chitwan, Dolakha, and Kathmandu Districts Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | WATSAN-Urban district baselines TA – 7984 NEP October, 2013 Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development 1 Main Consultancy Package (44768-012) CHITWAN DISTRICT BASELINE: DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE (DWSS) – URBAN WATSAN Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management METCON Consultants APTEC Consulting Prepared for Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Nepal Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Department, South Asia Department, Asian Development Bank Version B i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CHITWAN DISTRICT .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Chitwan Sector Master Plan ........................................................................................... -
CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: a RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal
Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Citation: WWF Nepal 2013. Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL): A Rapid Assessment, Nepal, August 2013 Cover photo: © Neyret & Benastar / WWF-Canon Gerald S. Cubitt / WWF-Canon Simon de TREY-WHITE / WWF-UK James W. Thorsell / WWF-Canon Michel Gunther / WWF-Canon WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program / Pallavi Dhakal Disclaimer This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Kathmandu Forestry College (KAFCOL) and do not necessarily reflect the views of WWF, USAID or the United States Government. © WWF Nepal. All rights reserved. WWF Nepal, PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Foreword With its diverse topographical, geographical and climatic variation, Nepal is rich in biodiversity and ecosystem services. It boasts a large diversity of flora and fauna at genetic, species and ecosystem levels. Nepal has several critical sites and wetlands including the fragile Churia ecosystem. These critical sites and biodiversity are subjected to various anthropogenic and climatic threats. Several bilateral partners and donors are working in partnership with the Government of Nepal to conserve Nepal’s rich natural heritage. USAID funded Hariyo Ban Program, implemented by a consortium of four partners with WWF Nepal leading alongside CARE Nepal, FECOFUN and NTNC, is working towards reducing the adverse impacts of climate change, threats to biodiversity and improving livelihoods of the people in Nepal. -
Chitwan District Vulnerability Assessment Report
TA – 7984 NEP April, 2014 Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development 1 Main Consultancy Package (44768-012) WATSAN – CHITWAN DISTRICT VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management METCON Consultants APTEC Consulting Prepared for Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Nepal Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Department, South Asia Department, Asian Development Bank Version B (Draft for Comment) MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | WATSAN - Chitwan District – VA Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DISTRICT ASSETS/SYSTEM PRIORITIES .............................................................................. 1 1.1 Chitwan District WATSAN Infrastructure ........................................................................ 1 1.2 Vulnerability Assessments .............................................................................................. 1 2 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHOD ............................................................................ 3 2.1 VA Method ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Suitability of VA Method to WATSAN Sector .................................................................. 5 2.3 Climate Change Threat Profiles ....................................................................................... 6 3 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT RESULTS ........................................................................... -
Comparitive Benefits of Beekeeping Enterprise in Chitwan, Nepal
The Journal of Agriculture and Environment Vol:10, Jun.2009 Technical Paper COMPARITIVE BENEFITS OF BEEKEEPING ENTERPRISE IN CHITWAN, NEPAL Suroj Pokhrel (PhD)1 ABSTRACT Based on the survey cunducted in 2004, beekeepers in Chitwan had small and fragmented land holdings with lower rate of return from subsistence crop farming. They are keeping Apis mellifera L.in Langstroth hive in Terai and A. cerana Fab. in improved, traditional-log and wall hives in hills, for honey production purpose. The honey productivity in Terai was 3.54 folds higher (28.7 vs 8.1 kg/yr/hive) than in hills with highest average annual income in Bharatpur area followed by East and West Chitwan. Moreover, the income of the beekeepers in Chitwan from honey production was 3.62 folds higher than crop farming (NRs 83,996.88 vs NRs 23,214.22 /house hold/year). It clearly showed that beekeeping with A. mellifera in the Terai is potential enterprise for higher income compared to crop production. Key words: annual income, apiculture, crop production, honey productivity, land holding. INTRODUCTION Bee Keeping Section (2004) reported 1,27,501 honeybee colonies including 1,01,684 traditional (log and wall hives) and 25,200 improved (A. cerana 17,744 and A. mellifera 7,456) hives kept in Nepal. The annual honey production is estimated 529.3 mt and it is one of the exporting, high value cash earning commodities in Nepal. Honey export in the year 2003 was equivalent to Rs 4,41,985 and was 4439.2 folds higher than that of 2002 (Bee Keeping Section, 2003). -
ROJ BAHADUR KC DHAPASI 2 Kamalapokhari Branch ABS EN
S. No. Branch Account Name Address 1 Kamalapokhari Branch MANAHARI K.C/ ROJ BAHADUR K.C DHAPASI 2 Kamalapokhari Branch A.B.S. ENTERPRISES MALIGAON 3 Kamalapokhari Branch A.M.TULADHAR AND SONS P. LTD. GYANESHWAR 4 Kamalapokhari Branch AAA INTERNATIONAL SUNDHARA TAHAGALLI 5 Kamalapokhari Branch AABHASH RAI/ KRISHNA MAYA RAI RAUT TOLE 6 Kamalapokhari Branch AASH BAHADUR GURUNG BAGESHWORI 7 Kamalapokhari Branch ABC PLACEMENTS (P) LTD DHAPASI 8 Kamalapokhari Branch ABHIBRIDDHI INVESTMENT PVT LTD NAXAL 9 Kamalapokhari Branch ABIN SINGH SUWAL/AJAY SINGH SUWAL LAMPATI 10 Kamalapokhari Branch ABINASH BOHARA DEVKOTA CHOWK 11 Kamalapokhari Branch ABINASH UPRETI GOTHATAR 12 Kamalapokhari Branch ABISHEK NEUPANE NANGIN 13 Kamalapokhari Branch ABISHEK SHRESTHA/ BISHNU SHRESTHA BALKHU 14 Kamalapokhari Branch ACHUT RAM KC CHABAHILL 15 Kamalapokhari Branch ACTION FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION TRUST GAHANA POKHARI 16 Kamalapokhari Branch ACTIV NEW ROAD 17 Kamalapokhari Branch ACTIVE SOFTWARE PVT.LTD. MAHARAJGUNJ 18 Kamalapokhari Branch ADHIRAJ RAI CHISAPANI, KHOTANG 19 Kamalapokhari Branch ADITYA KUMAR KHANAL/RAMESH PANDEY CHABAHIL 20 Kamalapokhari Branch AFJAL GARMENT NAYABAZAR 21 Kamalapokhari Branch AGNI YATAYAT PVT.LTD KALANKI 22 Kamalapokhari Branch AIR NEPAL INTERNATIONAL P. LTD. HATTISAR, KAMALPOKHARI 23 Kamalapokhari Branch AIR SHANGRI-LA LTD. Thamel 24 Kamalapokhari Branch AITA SARKI TERSE, GHYALCHOKA 25 Kamalapokhari Branch AJAY KUMAR GUPTA HOSPITAL ROAD 26 Kamalapokhari Branch AJAYA MAHARJAN/SHIVA RAM MAHARJAN JHOLE TOLE 27 Kamalapokhari Branch AKAL BAHADUR THING HANDIKHOLA 28 Kamalapokhari Branch AKASH YOGI/BIKASH NATH YOGI SARASWATI MARG 29 Kamalapokhari Branch ALISHA SHRESTHA GOPIKRISHNA NAGAR, CHABAHIL 30 Kamalapokhari Branch ALL NEPAL NATIONAL FREE STUDENT'S UNION CENTRAL OFFICE 31 Kamalapokhari Branch ALLIED BUSINESS CENTRE RUDRESHWAR MARGA 32 Kamalapokhari Branch ALLIED INVESTMENT COMPANY PVT. -
C E N T R a L W E S T E
Bhijer J u m l a Saldang N E P A L - W E S T E R N R E G I O N Patarasi Chhonhup f Zones, Districts and Village Development Committees, April 2015 Tinje Lo M anthang Kaingaon National boundary Zone boundary Village Development Comm ittee boundary Phoksundo Chhosar Region boundary District boundary Gothichour Charang Date Created: 28 Apr 2015 Contact: [email protected] Data sources: WFP, Survey Department of Nepal, SRTM Website: www.wfp.org 0 10 20 40 Rim i Prepared by: HQ, OSEP GIS The designations employed and the presentation of material in M I D - W E Dho S T E R N the map(s) do not imply the expression of any opinion on the Kilom eters part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any Map Reference: country, territory, city or sea, or concerning the delimitation of its ± frontiers or boundaries. Sarmi NPL_ADMIN_WesternRegion_A0L Pahada © World Food Programme 2015 Narku Chharka Liku Gham i Tripurakot Kalika K A R N A L I FAR-W ESTERN Lhan Raha MID-W ESTERN BJ a Hj a Er kRo It Surkhang Bhagawatitol Juphal D o l p a M u s t a n g W ESTERN Lawan Suhu Chhusang CENTRAL Gotam kot EASTERN Dunai Majhphal Mukot Kagbeni Sahartara Jhong Phu Nar Syalakhadhi Sisne Marpha Muktinath Jom som Tangkim anang Tukuche Ranm am aikot M a n a n g Baphikot Jang Pipal Pwang R u k u m Kowang Khangsar Ghyaru Mudi Pokhara M y a g d i Bhraka Sam agaun Gurja Ransi Hukam Syalpakha Kunjo Thoche W LeteE S T Manang E R N Chokhawang Kanda Narachyang Sankh Shova Chhekam par Kol Bagarchhap Pisang Kuinem angale Marwang Taksera Prok Dana Bihi Lulang Chim khola -
BIODIVERSITY, PEOPLE and CLIMATE CHANGE Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase
BIODIVERSITY, PEOPLE AND CLIMATE CHANGE Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase Volume Two Detailed Annexes HARIYO BAN PROGRAM This final technical report for Hariyo Ban Program Phase One is submitted to the United States Agency for International Development Nepal Mission by World Wildlife Fund Nepal in partnership with CARE, the Federation of Community Forest Users Nepal and the National Trust for Nature Conservation, under Cooperative Agreement Number AID-367-A-11-00003. © WWF Nepal 2017 All rights reserved Citation Please cite this report as: WWF Nepal. 2017. Biodiversity, People and Climate Change: Final Technical Report of the Hariyo Ban Program, First Phase. WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program, Kathmandu, Nepal. Cover photo credit © Karine Aigner/WWF-US Disclaimer: This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of WWF and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 7 April, 2017 Table of Contents ANNEX 5: HARIYO BAN PROGRAM WORKING AREAS ......................................................................... 1 ANNEX 6: COMMUNITY BASED ANTI-POACHING UNITS FORMED/REFORMED ................................. 4 ANNEX 7: SUPPORT FOR INTEGRATED SUB-WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANS ........................... 11 ANNEX 8: CHARACTERISTICS OF PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SCHEMES PILOTED ......... 12 ANNEX 9: COMMUNITY ADAPTATION PLANS OF ACTION PREPARED ............................................. -
LATEST and FINAL 26-06-19.Xlsx
CATUK List of Life Members (as at 26/06/2019) LM No Surname Name Address in Nepal 1 Gaire Pandit Prem Prasad Ratopul 2 Gurung (Thakali) Bhanu Pokhara Bajar 3 Gurung Amala Surya Nagar, Chitawan 4 Ghimire Budhhi Sagar Kathmandu 5 Gurung Pro. Chandra Bahadur Pokhara 6 Gurung Deepak (David Pokhara 7 Gurung Dambar Bharatpur 8 Joshi Hiranya Man Narayanghat 9 Gurung Hit Kaji Durlung, Parbat 10 Aryal Gyanu Patihani, Chitwan 11 Gurung Jit Tangting, Kaski 12 Gurung Lal Bahadur Durlung, Parbat 13 Gurung Kamal ChhetraPur, Chitawan 14 Sapkota Kamalapati Bharatpur, Chitwan 15 Gurung Kamal Bharatpur, Chitwan 16 Gurung Muchhetra Pokhara 17 Gurung Min Prasad Pokhara 18 Gurung Nanda Prasad Gitanagar, Chitawan 19 Kandel Narayan Prasad Gaidakot 20 Pandey Parsuram Gitanagar 21 Gurung Purna Parbatinagar 22 Gurung Prem Saradanagar 23 Gurung Ram Chandra (Surje) Pokhara 24 Subedi Bhagawati Koirala Bharatpur 25 Gurung Surya Pokhara 26 Lamichhane Shanta Binod Bharatpur 27 Gurung Shankar Shiva Nagar 28 Gaire Ravi Lal Japan Birendra Nagar , 29 Sapkota Khem NarayanGhat,Chitawan 30 Shrestha Kapil Chitawan 31 Bhattarai Hari YagyaPuri 1 of 5 32 Poudel Kamal Bharatpur 33 Gurung Lok Gunja Nagar 34 Ghale Shiva Kumar Surya Nagar 35 Gurung Himal Bharatpur 36 Sharma Subas Subas Sharma 37 Gurung Hima Rampur 38 Shreshtha Basanta Rampur 39 Subedi Tank Kawasati 40 Adhikari Prakash Bharatpur 41 Dhakal Shankar Bharatpur 42 Shreshtha Devendra Gita Nagar 43 Gurung Krishna Bharatpur 44 Gurung Abhisek Rampur 45 Sapkota Bhim Rampur 46 Shreshtha Madan Kumar Gita Nagar 47 Gurung Krishna -
Evaluation of Protected Areas – a Case Study of Chitwan National Park of Nepal
Co-financed by the European Union M.Sc. Programme “Management of Protected Areas” Evaluation of Protected Areas – a case study of Chitwan National Park of Nepal Author: Ganga Nakarmi Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Michael Getzner University of Klagenfurt A-9020 Klagenfurt Ph +43 (0) 463/27 00 4192 Email: [email protected]. Lect. Mag. Michael Jungmier ECO Institute for Ecology A-9020 Klagenfurt Ph +43 (0) 463/5041444 Email: [email protected] Carried out at: Department of Economics University of Klagenfurt Universitaetsstrasse 65-67 A 9020 Klagenfurt Ph +43 (0) 463/ 27 00 4192 e-mail: [email protected] Chitwan Nepal 2006/2007 Citation: G. Nakarmi (2007): EVALUATION OF THE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTECTED AREAS – A CASE STUDY OF CHITWAN NATIONAL PARK , NEPAL . MASTER THESIS , UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT , AUSTRIA GANGA NAKARMI INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background There is an increase trend of conserving the natural resources by designating an area as one where various types of resources are under protection. More than 100,000 designated protected areas have been listed in the World Database on Protected Areas which cover around 11.4 % of the Earth’s land surface along with marine protected areas (Dudley N. et. al. 2005). Since the IV th World Congress 1992 the prior paradigm focusing on the conservation of species and habitats has been gradually shifting to dynamic and participatory conservation. In the former days protection was somehow done on an ad hoc basis but today deliberate protection with laws, Acts, policies, regulations and management plans is being practiced so as to guide management needs and processes for better management.