DOCSLIB.ORG

Rethinking Boundaries in Cyberspace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rethinking Boundaries in Cyberspace Communications and Society Program Rethinking Boundaries in Cyberspace A Report of the Aspen Institute Internet Policy Project by Erez Kalir and Elliot E. Maxwell Rethinking Boundaries in Cyberspace A Report of the Aspen Institute Internet Policy Project by Erez Kalir and Elliot E. Maxwell Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, DC 2002 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Fulfillment Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5338 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Web address: www.aspeninstitute.org/c&s Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2002 by the Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2002 by the Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN #0-89843-336-3 02-007 1142/CSP/02-BK Contents FOREWORD, Elliot E. Maxwell ..........................................................................v RETHINKING BOUNDARIES IN CYBERSPACE, Erez Kalir and Elliot E. Maxwell ......................................................................1 Prologue: Why a Conference on Internet Governance? .............................3 Trends and Challenges: Where We Are Now ..............................................7 Guiding Principles .....................................................................................13 Roles of Different Actors (I): Traditional Governments ........................................................................21 Roles of Different Actors (II): Alternative Governance Organizations ..................................................26 Roles of Different Actors (III): Corporations, Traditional NGOs, and Users .........................................30 Coming Full Circle: Three Specific Governance Challenges ...................35 Conclusion..................................................................................................41 APPENDIX List of Conference Participants .................................................................49 About the Authors......................................................................................51 The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program..................53 Foreword The Aspen Institute’s Internet Policy Project has never lacked ambition. Under the leadership of David Johnson, one of the pioneers of cyberlaw, and then Andrew Shapiro, an influential commentator on Internet issues, the Project sponsored a series of small group meetings and workshops aimed at helping to create an intellectual framework for Internet policy. These meetings focused on the privatization of the domain name system, Internet privacy, the impact of the Internet on intellectual property rules, jurisdiction in cyberspace, the legal nature of e-commerce transactions, and the applicability of self-regulation and self-ordering to the resolution of Internet-related issues. It was an agenda fitting the fulsome ambitions for this new medium. The meetings resulted in significant contributions to the development of new approaches to Internet governance and policymaking. During the past year, the Project has focused on the next generation of Internet issues. In the early days of the Internet, many commentators saw it as a special place, “borderless” and free from government intervention, a locale run by and for its participants. Even in the first major Internet policy statement by the U.S. government in 1997—The Framework for Global Electronic Commerce—the emphasis was on private-sector leadership regarding Internet policy. But as the Internet has grown in visibility and importance—economically, socially, politically, and culturally— and as the number of international transactions utilizing the medium has exploded, it is no surprise that governments around the world have begun to give it greater scrutiny. In many cases governments have begun to pass laws and regulations seeking to control conduct and content on the Internet, within and beyond their borders. In the summer of 2001, 24 participants—leading entrepreneurs, technologists, academics, and policy advisors—took part in a three- day conference convened by the Project titled “Rethinking Boundaries in Cyberspace.” The conference agenda focused on the growth of government involvement in the Internet and, in particular, the implications of the exercise of extraterritorial reach by v vi RETHINKING BOUNDARIES IN CYBERSPACE governments in areas such as privacy, taxation, content regulation, and the sales of goods or services. A central question, given the global nature of the Internet, is who will make the rules governing these and other issues, and what values will underlie these rules. Will rules be made by local, national, or international authorities, by governmental bodies or by private-sector actors? Will the rules encourage or discourage the continued growth and development of the Internet? These questions have even greater resonance in the post–September 11th environment as governments focus on security issues and seek to extend their jurisdiction worldwide in order to battle terrorism. This question of who will make the rules is not new: It has been addressed in the context of the privatization of the domain name system. But the broad range of issues of interest to governments dramatically raises the stakes. The exercise of sovereignty by physically based states could result in new borders on the “borderless” Internet, policed using rapidly developing location- identifying technologies. Imposition of national policies, based on values that vary from country to country or locality to locality, raises the possibility of segmenting the global Internet into a series of regional, national, or even local data networks. But control of the Internet by governments was not the only issue of control raised at the meeting. The conference also recognized the rise in “private governance.”As Larry Lessig and others have pointed out, more and more “policy” decisions are being made by private players and are being embodied in the hardware and software that allow access to the Internet and provide its myriad applications. These policies found in “code” are part of a larger trend whereby private actors make decisions that in the “physical world” would be the province of governments. In some cases, governments have delegated responsibilities to private firms (as in the most recent Council of Europe Treaty), deferred to industry self-regulation, or allowed firms to exercise control based on the firms’ own view of competitive advantage. If private firms are going to be the ones who make the rules for the Internet, it is important to understand the values and criteria they will employ. At the same time, there is a technological arms race between those who seek to expand control and those who seek to minimize or Foreword vii escape it. Technologies to provide anonymity or promote privacy continue to develop. They offer mixed blessings: protecting private information or shielding dissidents from oppressive regimes and at the same time allowing bad actors to escape their just rewards. The conference examined one of these technologies—peer-to-peer computing—which undermines control because of the absence of any central point of authority. These technologies, coupled with the rise of new communities such as those of the instant messaging world, are simultaneously being praised for their ability to support collaboration and resource sharing and condemned for facilitating massive violations of copyright law. The debates over of control will surely continue. They must, because the stakes are so high. They involve the central characteristics of the Internet: the ability to communicate and collaborate with anyone online; to access staggering amounts of information hosted around the world; and to choose content, services, and features on the Net free from constraints built into the network itself. The consequences of choosing the wrong path are a dramatic decline in the political, social, and economic innovation made possible by the Internet. The conversations at the meeting were exceedingly rich. The following report is not a simple summary but an attempt to extract the most salient themes, provide a useful context in which to view them, and identify issues worthy of future dialogue. The rules under which these Aspen meetings take place encourage wide-ranging dialogue that focuses on underlying values—in this case those of communications, collaboration, and community. The Internet has broadened our sense of the possibilities in all of these areas. This publication reflects the general sense of the meeting, though each participant may not agree with every statement. Further, the opinions expressed are those of the authors and not of any current or former employer. By this report’s dissemination, we seek to engage a wider group in discussing how to ensure that the medium grows and flourishes. Acknowledgments I am pleased to acknowledge and thank our sponsors for their generous contributions to the success of the conference. The viii RETHINKING BOUNDARIES IN CYBERSPACE following entities sponsored the 2001 conference: Catenas, Citigroup,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leaving Reality Behind Etoy Vs Etoys Com Other Battles to Control Cyberspace By: Adam Wishart Regula Bochsler ISBN: 0066210763 See Detail of This Book on Amazon.Com
    Leaving Reality Behind etoy vs eToys com other battles to control cyberspace By: Adam Wishart Regula Bochsler ISBN: 0066210763 See detail of this book on Amazon.com Book served by AMAZON NOIR (www.amazon-noir.com) project by: PAOLO CIRIO paolocirio.net UBERMORGEN.COM ubermorgen.com ALESSANDRO LUDOVICO neural.it Page 1 discovering a new toy "The new artist protests, he no longer paints." -Dadaist artist Tristan Tzara, Zh, 1916 On the balmy evening of June 1, 1990, fleets of expensive cars pulled up outside the Zurich Opera House. Stepping out and passing through the pillared porticoes was a Who's Who of Swiss society-the head of state, national sports icons, former ministers and army generals-all of whom had come to celebrate the sixty-fifth birthday of Werner Spross, the owner of a huge horticultural business empire. As one of Zurich's wealthiest and best-connected men, it was perhaps fitting that 650 of his "close friends" had been invited to attend the event, a lavish banquet followed by a performance of Romeo and Juliet. Defiantly greeting the guests were 200 demonstrators standing in the square in front of the opera house. Mostly young, wearing scruffy clothes and sporting punky haircuts, they whistled and booed, angry that the opera house had been sold out, allowing itself for the first time to be taken over by a rich patron. They were also chanting slogans about the inequity of Swiss society and the wealth of Spross's guests. The glittering horde did its very best to ignore the disturbance. The protest had the added significance of being held on the tenth anniversary of the first spark of the city's most explosive youth revolt of recent years, The Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Task Force Report
    THE MARKLE FOUNDATION TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE INFORMATION AGE Chairmen John Gage Participating Experts Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Non-government) Zoë Baird Markle Foundation Slade Gorton Bruce Berkowitz Preston Gates & Ellis RAND Corporation James L. Barksdale The Barksdale Group Morton H. Halperin Robert Clerman Open Society Institute Mitretek Executive Director Margaret A. Hamburg Mary DeRosa Philip Zelikow Nuclear Threat Initiative Center for Strategic and International Miller Center of Public Affairs Studies University of Virginia John J. Hamre Center for Strategic and International Lauren Hall Members Studies Microsoft Alexander Aleinikoff Eric Holder James Lewis Georgetown University Law Center Covington & Burling Center for Strategic and International Studies Robert D. Atkinson Arnold Kanter Progressive Policy Institute The Scowcroft Group Gilman Louie In-Q-Tel Stewart A. Baker Robert Kimmitt Steptoe & Johnson AOL Time Warner, Inc. Douglas McDonald Abt Associates Eric Benhamou Michael O. Leavitt 3Com Corp. and Palm, Inc. Governor of Utah Daniel Ortiz University of Virginia Jerry Berman Tara Lemmey School of Law Center for Democracy and Project LENS Technology Michael Vatis Judith A. Miller Institute for Security and Technology Robert M. Bryant Williams & Connolly Studies National Insurance Crime Bureau Dartmouth College James H. Morris Ashton Carter Carnegie Mellon University Task Force Staff Harvard University Craig Mundie Mary McKinley Wesley Clark Microsoft Associate Director Stephens Group, Inc. Jeffrey H. Smith Ryan Coonerty Wayne Clough Arnold & Porter Government Affairs Counsel Georgia Institute of Technology Abraham D. Sofaer Peter Kerr William P. Crowell Hoover Institution Markle Foundation Cylink Corporation Stanford University Laura Rozen Sidney D. Drell James B. Steinberg Senior Associate Stanford University The Brookings Institution Tara Sonenshine Esther Dyson Paul Schott Stevens Advisor EDventure Holdings Dechert Stefaan Verhulst Amitai Etzioni Rick White Markle Foundation The George Washington University TechNet David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Trusted Information Network for Homeland Security Second Report of the Markle Foundation Task Force
    Creating a Trusted Network for Homeland Security Second Report of the Markle Foundation Task Force zoë baird, james barksdale chairmen michael a. vatis executive director Copyright © 2003 Markle Foundation All rights reserved. ISBN 0-9747809-0-1 markle foundation task force on national security in the information age Chairmen Slade Gorton James Dempsey Preston, Gates & Ellis Center for Democracy and Technology Zoë Baird Markle Foundation Morton H. Halperin Mary DeRosa Open Society Institute Center for Strategic and International James L. Barksdale Studies The Barksdale Group Margaret A. Hamburg Nuclear Threat Initiative Lara Flint Executive Director Center for Democracy and Technology John J. Hamre Michael A. Vatis Center for Strategic and International Lauren Hall Markle Foundation Studies Microsoft Members Eric Holder Jeff Jonas Covington & Burling Systems Research & Development Alexander Aleinikoff Georgetown University Law Center Arnold Kanter James Lewis The Scowcroft Group Center for Strategic and International Robert D. Atkinson Studies Progressive Policy Institute Michael O. Leavitt Governor of Utah Terrill D. Maynard Stewart Baker Steptoe & Johnson Tara Lemmey Mary McCarthy Project LENS Center for Strategic and International Eric Benhamou Studies 3Com Corporation Gilman Louie In-Q-Tel Patrick J. Sullivan, Jr. Jerry Berman Cherry Creek Schools Center for Democracy and Technology Judith A. Miller Williams & Connolly Winston Wiley Robert M. Bryant Booz Allen Hamilton National Insurance Crime Bureau James Morris Carnegie Mellon University Associate Director Ashton Carter Harvard University Craig Mundie Mary McKinley Microsoft Markle Foundation Wesley P. Clark Wesley P. Clark & Associates Jeffrey H. Smith Task Force Staff Arnold & Porter Wayne Clough Nancy Boursiquot Georgia Institute of Technology Abraham D.
    [Show full text]
  • Azer Bestavros Biographical Sketch
    Azer Bestavros Biographical Sketch Azer Bestavros is Warren Distinguished Professor of Computer Science and Founding Director of the Hariri Institute for Comput- ing at Boston University (BU), which was set up in 2011 as an incu- bator for high-risk, high-reward multidisciplinary collaborations. Notable efforts that he incubated at the Institute, which matured into multi-million-dollar projects, include the $25M+ Mass Open Cloud, $10M NSF Cloud Security Frontier project, $5M Red Hat Collaboratory for open-source innovation, and the $1M+ SCOPE cloud platform for smart-city applications. Under his leadership, the Institute served as an anchor for a number of university pro- grams, including the Data Science Initiative (DSI), the Digital Health Initiative, the Digital Learning Initiative (DLI), the AI Research Initiative (AIR), the Cyber Security, Law, and Society Alliance, the Software & Application Innovation Lab (SAIL), and BU Spark! for student-driven innovation. Prior to his inaugural role at the Hariri Institute, Professor Bestavros chaired the BU Computer Science Department from 2000 to 2007, having joined it in 1991 after completing his PhD in Computer Science at Harvard University. He holds affiliated appointments in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, the Division of Systems Engineering, and a number of research centers at BU. He held visiting professorships at Harvard University, Institut Eur´ecomin France, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, and the American University in Cairo. A distinguished educator and scholar, Professor Bestavros teaches and pursues research in networking, distributed computing, cybersecurity, and high-assurance systems. His semi- nal contributions include pioneering studies of web push caching through content distribution networks, self-similar Internet traffic characterization, game-theoretic cloud resource manage- ment, and safety certification of networked systems and software.
    [Show full text]
  • Markle Foundation
    Implementing a Trusted Information Sharing Environment Using Immutable Audit Logs to Increase Security, Trust, and Accountability A PAPER BY THE MARKLE TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE INFORMATION AGE zoë baird, james barksdale chairmen M A R K L E F O U N D A T I O N TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE INFORMATION AGE MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATES, 2006 Chairmen Eric H. Holder, Jr. Richard Falkenrath Covington & Burling The Brookings Institution Zoë Baird Markle Foundation Jeff Jonas David Gunter IBM Microsoft Corporation Jim Barksdale Barksdale Management Corporation Arnold Kanter Drew Ladner The Scowcroft Group JBoss, Inc. Members Tara Lemmey Randolph D. Moss Robert D. Atkinson LENS Ventures Wilmer Cutler Pickering LLP Progressive Policy Institute Gilman Louie Bill Neugent Eric Benhamou Alsop Louie Partners MITRE 3Com Corporation, Palm, Inc., Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC John O. Marsh, Jr. Daniel Prieto Marsh Institute for Government and Public Kennedy School of Government, Harvard Jerry Berman Policy, Shenandoah University University Center for Democracy & Technology Judith A. Miller Clay Shirky Robert M. Bryant Bechtel Group, Inc. Writer and Consultant National Insurance Crime Bureau James H. Morris Peter Swire Ashton B. Carter Carnegie Mellon University Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Craig Mundie Kim Taipale Microsoft Corporation Center for Advanced Studies in Science and Wesley Clark Technology Policy Wesley K. Clark & Associates Jeffrey H. Smith Arnold & Porter LLP Mel Taub William P. Crowell Independent Consultant Security and Intelligence Consultant Abraham D. Sofaer Hoover Institution, Stanford University Richard Wilhelm Bryan Cunningham Booz Allen Hamilton Morgan & Cunningham LLC James B.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Learning Futures Digital Media & Learning Conference
    DESIGNING LEARNING FUTURES DIGITAL MEDIA & LEARNING CONFERENCE MARCH 3-5, 2011 // LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPONSORS OVERVIEW About the Theme: Designing Learning Futures Conference Chair and Committee Keynotes and Plenary Session Panelists CONFERENCE SCHEDULE [9] Overview [10] March 3, 2011 [11] March 4, 2011 [11] March 5, 2011 CONFERENCE INFORMATION Wireless and Social Media at DML2011 Conference Receptions and Gatherings CONFERENCE PROGRAM ABSTRACTS [15] March 3, 2011 [28] March 4, 2011 [51] March 5, 2011 CONFERENCE PROGRAM DEMOS AND EXHIBITS March 3, 2011: Mozilla Science Fair March 4, 2011: Demos & Exhibits Sponsored by the Pearson Foundation MAPS Conference Venue Maps Map of Local Area GENERAL INFORMATION About Long Beach Travel and Accommodation Local Cuisine SUPPLEMENTS RoadTrip Nation DMLcentral DML Competition DESIGNING LEARNING FUTURES DIGITAL MEDIA & LEARNING CONFERENCE Hilton Conference & Meeting Center // Long Beach, CaliforniaMarch 3-5, 2011 CONFERENCE CHAIR Katie Salen CONFERENCE COMMITTEE Kimberly Austin Student Volunteers Chair danah boyd Emerging Platforms and Policies Chair Sheryl Grant DML Competition Liason Chair Heather A. Horst Local Organizing Committee Chair Trebor Scholz Social Media Chair Mark Surman New Collectives Chair S. Craig Watkins Youth, Digital Media and Empowerment Chair KEYNOTE PRESENTERS Alice Taylor Muki Hansteen-Izora The Digital Media and Learning Conference is an annual event supported by the MacArthur Foun- dation and organized by the Digital Media and Learning Research Hub at University of California, Irvine. The conference is meant to be an inclusive, international and annual gathering of scholars and practitioners in the field, focused on fostering interdisciplinary and participatory dialog and linking theory, empirical study, policy, and practice. SPONSORS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UC HUMANITIES RESEHRARCH INSTITUTEI DML hub CONFERENCE OVERVIEW The Digital Media and Learning Conference 2011 is the second annual event organized by the Digital Media and Learning Hub at the University of California, Irvine.
    [Show full text]
  • “There Are Many Things to Love About Connecting for Health
    Nation At Risk: Policy Makers Need Better Information to Protect the Country The Markle Foundation Task Force on National Security in the Information Age March 2009 THE MARKLE FOUNDATION TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE INFORMATION AGE Zoë Baird, Co-Chair* Jim Barksdale, Co-Chair The Markle Foundation Barksdale Management Corporation MEMBERS: Robert D. Atkinson Jim Dempsey* Slade Gorton* Judith A. Miller* Information Technology and Center for Democracy & K&L Gates Bechtel Group, Inc. Innovation Foundation Technology Morton H. Halperin James H. Morris Rand Beers** Mary DeRosa** Open Society Institute Carnegie Mellon University National Security Network Senate Committee on the Judiciary Margaret A. Hamburg** Craig Mundie Eric Benhamou Nuclear Threat Initiative Microsoft Corporation 3Com Corporation, Palm, Inc., Sidney D. Drell Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC Stanford Linear John J. Hamre Jeffrey H. Smith* Accelerator Center, Center for Strategic and Arnold & Porter LLP Jerry Berman Stanford University International Studies Center for Democracy & Abraham D. Sofaer* Technology Esther Dyson Eric H. Holder, Jr.** Hoover Institution, CNET Networks Covington & Burling Stanford University Robert M. Bryant National Insurance Crime Bureau Amitai Etzioni Jeff Jonas* James B. Steinberg** The George Washington IBM Lyndon Johnson School of Public Ashton B. Carter** University Affairs, University of Texas at Kennedy School of Government, Arnold Kanter Austin Harvard University Richard Falkenrath The Scowcroft Group New York Police Department Kim Taipale Wesley Clark Tara Lemmey* Center for Advanced Studies in Wesley K. Clark & Associates David J. Farber LENS Ventures Science Carnegie Mellon University and Technology Policy William P. Crowell* Gilman Louie Security and Intelligence John Gage Alsop Louie Partners Rick White* Consultant Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers former Member of Congress John O.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Dilbert Paradox
    Solving the Dilbert Paradox Richard Adler Rapporteur Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, D.C. 2011 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2011 by The Aspen Institute This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2011 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-545-5 11-006 1816CSP/11-BK Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone ...............................................................v SOLVING THE DILBERT PARADOX, Richard Adler Defining the Dilbert Paradox ......................................................................... 3 Defining Talent ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilizing Information to Prevent Terrorism Accelerating Development of a Trusted Information Sharing Environment
    Mobilizing Information to Prevent Terrorism Accelerating Development of a Trusted Information Sharing Environment Third Report of the Markle Foundation Task Force ZOË BAIRD, JAMES BARKSDALE CHAIRMEN M ARKLE F OUNDATION TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE INFORMATION AGE MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATES, 2006 Chairmen John Gage Richard Wilhelm Sun Microsystems, Inc. Booz Allen Hamilton Zoë Baird Markle Foundation John Gordon Associates United States Air Force, Retired Jim Barksdale Bruce Berkowitz Barksdale Management Slade Gorton Hoover Institution, Stanford University Corporation Preston Gates & Ellis LLP Fred Cate Members Morton H. Halperin Indiana University School of Law Open Society Institute Bloomington Robert D. Atkinson Information Technology Margaret A. Hamburg Scott Charney and Innovation Foundation Nuclear Threat Initiative Microsoft Corporation Rand Beers John J. Hamre Bob Clerman Coalition for American Leadership Center for Strategic and International Mitretek Systems and Security Studies David Gunter Eric Benhamou Eric H. Holder, Jr. Microsoft Corporation 3Com Corporation, Palm, Inc., Benhamou Covington & Burling Global Ventures, LLC Drew Ladner Jeff Jonas JBoss, Inc. Jerry Berman IBM Center for Democracy & Technology Bill Neugent Arnold Kanter MITRE Robert M. Bryant The Scowcroft Group National Insurance Crime Bureau Daniel B. Prieto Tara Lemmey Reform Institute Ashton B. Carter LENS Ventures Kennedy School of Government, Clay Shirky Harvard University Gilman Louie Writer and Consultant Alsop Louie Partners Wesley Clark Peter Swire Wesley K. Clark & Associates John O. Marsh, Jr. Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State Marsh Institute for Government and University William P. Crowell Public Policy, Shenandoah University Security and Intelligence Consultant Mel Taub Judith A. Miller Independent Consultant Bryan Cunningham Bechtel Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20436 Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge
    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20436 Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN POINT-TO-POINT NETWORK Investigation No. 337-TA-892 COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME RESPONDENTS’ IDENTIFICATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES Pursuant to the Procedural Schedule, Respondents AmTRAN Logistics, Inc. and AmTRAN Technology Co., Ltd., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America, Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., and Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and VIZIO, Inc. (collectively “Respondents”) hereby identify the following expert witnesses, including their expertise and curriculum vitae, who may testify on behalf of one or more Respondents at the hearing in this investigation. Respondents will present the testimony of these expert witnesses live, through witness statements, or through depositions. This identification of experts is based on Respondents’ current understanding of the evidence produced thus far during discovery. In as much as discovery is ongoing, Respondents reserve the right to supplement this identification as warranted. 1. Donal O’Mahony Professor Donal E. O’Mahoney received a degree in Engineering and a Ph.D in Computer Science from Trinity College Dublin, where he is presently a professor of Computer Science. Professor O’Mahoney’s areas of expertise include network protocols, security applications, mobility, ad-hoc networking, and the software engineering of networked systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Visioning Justice and the American Jewish Community
    VISIONING JUSTICE and the American Jewish Community by Shifra Bronznick and Didi Goldenhar CREDITS Shifra Bronznick served as principal author and investigator for Visioning Justice and the American Jewish Community, the research and action project launched by the Jewish Life and Values Program of the Nathan Cummings Foundation. Didi Goldenhar, served as co-author of Visioning Justice and the American Jewish Community. Dr. Steven M. Cohen provided scholarly counsel on American Jewish life and social justice. Hillary Leone and Christopher Bugbee offered important intelligence about new technologies and social media. Rabbi Jennie Rosenn, Director of the Jewish Life and Values Program of the Nathan Cummings Foundation, launched this inquiry and served as a wise and insightful partner throughout the process. A complete listing of individuals who generously participated in interviews and conversations can be found in Appendix A. Design: Cabengo LLC We appreciate the support of FJC. To download copies of this report go to www.nathancummings.net/jewish/001081.html The Nathan Cummings Foundation 475 Tenth Avenue, Fourteenth Floor New York, NY 10018 1.212.787.7300 www.nathancummings.org Table of Contents A Letter from the Nathan Cummings Foundation ………………………………… 4 Overview and Key Findings ……………………………………………………………………… 7 The Nathan Cummings Foundation and Jewish Social Justice …………………… 8 Visioning Justice and the American Jewish Community …………………………… 10 What We Have Learned ………………………………………………………………………………… 11 Strategies ……………………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunity Rising: Empowering Americans to Flourish in a Global Networked Economy and Revitalizingvisual the Identity American Dream Manual
    ECONOMIC FUTURE INITIATIVE Opportunity Rising: Empowering Americans to Flourish in a Global Networked Economy and RevitalizingVisual the Identity American Dream Manual In recent years, globalization and technology limitless possibilities offered by online have changed our way of life more than platforms, the digital economy can make it anyone could have imagined. While enriching far easier for Americans and businesses of “The America we want us in many ways, these forces also have all sizes to offer skills and services to anyone, eliminated traditionally secure jobs and anywhere—here or abroad. our children to inherit—a eroded economic security for millions. Now country that is strong and we face a great national challenge: finding Through information sharing, online tools, new strategies that help all Americans and innovative forms of credit and finance, inspires opportunity for flourish in today’s economy. people can more easily expand or launch new businesses and hire more workers. all—is at risk. There is Americans can learn and train in innovative “What big gear could we find that ways that can better connect them to good- nothing more important paying jobs. we could grab and move one way than finding ways to or another and make all the little The Initiative is both a catalyst and an ones spin?” advocate for actions that help Americans use advance Americans – Michael Leavitt the transformative forces of technology and Chairman, Leavitt Partners globalization to their advantage in order to at all income levels to Former Governor, State of Utah Former Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency succeed in a world of constant change.
    [Show full text]