DOCSLIB.ORG

MASSEY-April-2010.Pdf (7185

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MasseyThe magazine for alumni and friends of Massey University | Issue 27 | May 2010 fire down below living with volcanoes Choosing the right track Steven Joyce: from turntable to cabinet table Plus: saying when + the joy of sects + tiger country | MASSEY | April 2010 | 1 When we New Zealanders are trying to establish our credentials as a socially progressive nation, one of the ‘firsts’ we tend to mention (along with the introduction of votes for women in 1893) is the introduction of a state-funded old age pension in 1898, making us the first British country to bring in such a measure. There were, however, some buts when it came to that pension: to be eligible you had to be poor and deserving and you had to be old, remarkably old, by which I mean over 65. In 1898 the average life expectancy was in the mid-fifties, and a government could confidently vote in an old age pension knowing that few of its population would live to collect it. Contrast that with today. If someone now dies at the age of 65 it is not unusual for them to be described as dying young. In 2007 the average life expectancy stood at 78 for men and 82 for women. We are living longer and, by and large, we are living healthier. Why this vast leap in life expectancy? Partly one can thank advances in clinical medicine – many of us owe our lives to antibiotics. But equally, if not more, we owe the ‘years in our life’ and ‘the life in our years’ to measures that fall within the domain of public health: vaccination programmes, occupational and consumer safety measures, cleaner air and water, better nutrition, the promotion of healthy lifestyles, the success of anti-smoking legislation... the list goes on. Over the past two decades, Massey has amassed a distinguished record in public health research, with a number of independent centres working on particular areas of expertise. Now these centres, while retaining their autonomy, have been brought together under an overdue Massey School of Public Health, headed by Associate Professor Cindy Kiro, the former Commissioner for Children. Within their ambit falls research into such things as the critical role of sleep in health, the incidence and causes of asthma, cross cultural health service provision, changing patterns of illicit drug use, and our society’s vexed relationship with that licit drug, alcohol. It seems appropriate then that this issue of Massey begins with an interview with the School of Public Health’s Professor Sally Casswell, an internationally renowned expert on alcohol policy. With the alcohol debate in New Zealand about to enter a new phase, it is required reading. Steve Maharey Vice-Chancellor The Main Building in 1962 as featured on the cover of the New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 2 | MASSEY | April 2010 | CONTENTS >> FIRST PERSON Saying when New Zealand’s alcohol problem – and why we probably won’t do 2 enough to fix it. A conversation with Professor Sally Casswell. >> FEATURES Choosing the right track Steven Joyce’s path from Masskeradio to cabinet minister. 14 Massey is published twice yearly by Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, The joy of sects 19 New Zealand Dr Heather Kavan is fascinated by religious experience. www.massey.ac.nz Website: news.massey.ac.nz Tiger country Editor: Malcolm Wood Dr Brendan Moyle investigates the black market for tiger products. 22 [email protected] Writers: Kereama Beal, Lindsey Birnie, Kathryn Farrow, Fire down below James Gardiner, Bryan Gibson, Paul Mulrooney, 24 Jennifer Little, Lana Simmons Donaldson, Amanda Professor Shane Cronin and the volcanoes of the Pacific rim of fire. McAuliffe, Sonia Yoshioka-Braid Photographers : Graeme Brown, Doug Cole, Mark >> DEPARTMENTS Coote, David Wiltshire Design : Grant Bunyan Directions 5 For changes of address or to send in your news visit Findings 8 alumnionline.massey.ac.nz or e-mail [email protected]. Distinguished Alumni Awards 10 Copyright: You are generally welcome to reproduce material from Massey, provided you first gain Bookshelf 36 permission from the editor. Alumni Notes and News 39 Above: John Dawick as Richard III in a 1973 production outside the Main Building entrance. Plans are afoot to restore and renovate the Main Building and the Refectory. These two emblematic Manawatu campus buildings were designed in the 1920s by the then New Zealand-based American architect Roy Lippincott, New Zealand’s only direct link to the celebrated Chicago School architects Frank Lloyd Wright and Walter Burley Griffin. Left to right: Lord Bledisloe at the opening of the Main Science Building on 30 April 1931; the library in the Main Building; in the dressing room of the Drama Society’s 1979 production Love for Love, staged in the Grid Theatre; the Refectory in the 1950s; cartoon from Bleat, “World Workers Removing Hostel Steam Pudding to Dominion Museum.“ Images supplied by Massey Archives. || MASSEYMASSEY | | AprilApril 2010 2010 | | 1 FIRST PERSON | ALCOHOL REGULATION n matters to do with the understanding up licensing laws, allowing the sale of first of alcohol and public health, Professor wine and then beer from supermarkets, and Sally Casswell has a reputation to be dropping the minimum age of purchase reckoned with. from 20 to 18. The consequences for public IIn a June 2009 issue given over to alcohol health? A growing consensus seems to be that Saying and public health, The Lancet – the world’s matters have gone too far. oldest and best known medical journal – ran In 1994 Casswell – who, incidentally, a laudatory profile of her subtitled “champion neither abstains from alcohol herself nor for communities tackling alcohol”. A few moralises about its use – was a coauthor of months later she was appearing in a New the book Alcohol and the Public Good, and, when Scientist editorial in connection with the in 2003, of Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity, drafting of the World Health Organisation’s republished early this year in a revised first global strategy on reducing health edition. damage from alcohol. Casswell was a member of the WHO’s And as well as being an eminent researcher, expert committee that reported on alcohol- Casswell is the director of the highly related harm in 2008 and has been working successful Centre for Social and Health towards the drafting and international Outcomes and Evaluation (SHORE) based adoption of global strategy to reduce the in central Auckland. harmful use of alcohol. Born in Britain, Casswell arrived in New The strategy will be useful, but Casswell Zealand in the early 1970s as a postgraduate hopes it will not take the place of her larger, student, first studying the effects of cannabis long-term goal (the subject of a paper for her PhD and then turning her attention coauthored by her in that same issue of to alcohol and public health. The Lancet): a legally-binding international Her interest was timely. The 1974 report Framework Convention on Alcohol Control, of a Royal Commission ushered in the much like the successful Framework liberalisation of licensing laws – soon there Convention on Tobacco Control. were thousands of licensed sports bars, On the eve of the Law Commission’s hundreds of BYO restaurants, and many more recommendations on the reform of licensed restaurants – and further rounds New Zealand’s liquor laws, she spoke to of liberalising reforms followed, freeing Malcolm Wood. According to legend, you began your career as them and the policy response. But alcohol has Talking of the comparison, I see the term ‘passive a researcher with a freezer full of marijuana. an enormous amount of harm associated with drinking’ is now cropping up in the alcohol I did. Cannabis was of great interest in the its use. It is a historical accident, if you like, that regulation debate. What exactly does it mean? ’70s. When I first arrived in New Zealand I it is a legal drug and widely used. In the work we do I always refer to ‘alcohol and other drugs’ For a long time we have looked at the health got some Medical Research Council funding of the drinker, but ignored the family, the and a licence from the Department of Health, as the topic we work on to reinforce the notion that alcohol is a drug. workmates, the other people around the as it was then, and for my PhD I measured the heavy drinker. These people, even if they don’t effect of cannabis on reaction time, cognitive In public health terms, how does alcohol drink themselves, are being affected by alcohol behaviour and psychomotor skills generally. compare with that other legal-and-damaging consumption. This is sometimes being called Why the shift to alcohol research? drug tobacco? ‘passive drinking’. I was interested in recreational drug use and Tobacco is responsible for a higher degree In one of our Health Research Council (HRC) I realised that alcohol was the big one: that of premature mortality. But if you look at funded projects we have found a relationship was where a lot of the public health issues lay. disability-adjusted life years – that is not just between having a heavy drinker in your the years of life lost but the impact on quality surroundings and overall life satisfaction similar So you don’t make much distinction between of life following things like injury from driving to that of looking after people with disabilities. alcohol and other recreational drugs? while alcohol-impaired or violence while under This is interesting research from a policy They all have different impacts, and that has to the influence of alcohol – then alcohol and perspective because those people who are stuck be taken into account when thinking about tobacco are very similar.
Recommended publications
  • Ministers' Interests 2016-2017

    Ministers' Interests 2016-2017

    Cabinet Office Proactive release of information about management of ministerial conflicts of interest 1 October 2016 – 30 September 2017 Explanatory note 1 The table below is a summary of actions taken by Ministers during the period 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2017 in order to manage actual or potential conflicts of interest. It includes transfers of responsibility to other Ministers and standing arrangements not to receive Cabinet papers. Other steps for managing conflicts of interest set out at paragraph 2.74 of the Cabinet Manual (such as declarations of interest, and ad hoc or short term arrangements not to receive papers) are not included. 2 The Office of the Ombudsman has reviewed this summary and confirmed that it is consistent with the more detailed record held by the Cabinet Office. 3 The actions listed in the table are standing arrangements, and may cover multiple instances when responsibility was exercised by another Minister or papers were not received. It is also possible that there have been no such instances, because the particular issue has not arisen in practice. The table only includes new arrangements put in place in the period 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2017, and is not a full summary of all transfers of responsibility and arrangements not to receive papers that have been made or are currently in place. 4 The nature of each actual or potential conflict of interest is described using the following categories: • Pecuniary: relating to a Minister’s personal financial interests such as assets, debts and gifts • Personal: relating to a Minister’s non-financial personal interests, such as family, whānau or close associates, former employment and business activities, and (in certain limited circumstances) current and past involvement with specific organisations • Portfolio: relating to different aspects of a Minister’s official responsibilities • Constituency: relating to a Minister’s role as a member of Parliament.
  • SAANZ-Conference-Booklet-2016.Pdf

    SAANZ-Conference-Booklet-2016.Pdf

    Conference of the Sociological Association of Aotearoa New Zealand conference 22 to 24 November 2016 Hosted by Massey University Venue: East Pier Hotel, Napier, New Zealand (Cover art work: Fiona Clark, Massey University student) Welcome Dear conference attendee Welcome to the 2016 conference of the Sociological Association of Aotearoa New Zealand (SAANZ), hosted by Massey University. We sincerely hope that you enjoy this conference, and all that the conference venue – this year in Ahuriri, Napier - has to offer. If this is your first time attending a SAANZ conference then we would like to extend a particularly warm welcome to you. The conference this year has a very heartening number of students in attendance, making up around one third of the numbers overall. We also have a number of individuals that are not based in tertiary institutions; it is great to see interest in this conference stretching beyond academia. It is great to see all the familiar faces as well. We hope that everyone’s time here is interesting, pleasurable, motivating and productive. Finally, we would like to thank our sponsors: The Royal Society of New Zealand, the Sociology Association of New Zealand, and the School of People, Environment and Planning at Massey University. Yours sincerely, Conference organising committee If you have any urgent queries, please contact Corrina on 0278488659. Conference Theme Imagined futures: sociology, science and the arts Utopian hopes and dystopian fears surrounding scientific and technological solutions to human problems run deep. These are not new impulses and neither is their critique, by either sociological or other activist communities.
  • Symposium on Retirement Income Policy

    Symposium on Retirement Income Policy

    Symposium on Retirement Income Policy Looking back and looking forward Wednesday, 16 April 2008 TASK FORCES IN THE 1990s AND THE POLITICAL ACCORD Task Force on Private Provision for Retirement Politics, not economics or demographics, was the key driver of the retirement policy debate of the nineties. The appointment of the Task Force on Private Provision for Retirement on 10 October 1991 by Prime Minister Jim Bolger was, for me, the first step on a fascinating journey of research, education, consultation and consensus which extended through the decade. During the 1990s New Zealand re-constructed and developed its simple two part system for providing income in retirement based on public provision of a basic pension (New Zealand Superannuation) and voluntary private savings. Retirement savings were tax-neutral compared with other forms of financial savings. The 1990s began with radical changes to national super announced in the 1991 budget that would have converted the pension into a welfare benefit. The government was forced to backtrack and was left wondering what to do. Announcing the formation of the 1991 Task Force, the New Zealand Herald’s Simon Collins, under the heading Task force to study compulsory super, reported that the eight-member task force “will consider requiring New Zealanders to contribute to compulsory private pension schemes. The eight-member task force will also consider tax incentives for retirement saving, regulation of superannuation schemes and compulsory retirement ages. The group would report to a joint cabinet-caucus committee chaired by the Prime Minister, Mr Bolger.” In fact, the Hon WF (Bill) Birch was our principal government contact.
  • Election Will Be Crush Vs Smile It Was Fashionable at One Point in the Last Generation and a Half for Some Men to Refer to Their Inner Feminism

    Election Will Be Crush Vs Smile It Was Fashionable at One Point in the Last Generation and a Half for Some Men to Refer to Their Inner Feminism

    JT col for July 18 2020 - Crush v smile Election will be crush vs smile It was fashionable at one point in the last generation and a half for some men to refer to their inner feminism. I was one. But past performance not withstanding, I must still be viewed as a male chauv…or worse, an old male chauv. There, I’ve said it. The risk in what follows seems less: I’m delighted the leadership of the country will be contested by two women, Jacinda Ardern versus Judith Collins. How appropriate, given we were the first to “allow” women to vote. Not- withstanding further accidents, we’re headed into an election in which a woman is guaranteed to be Prime Minister. I must have had an inkling about this, because last week I went along to see Collins for myself. A self-declared good mate of Johnathan Young’s, she turned up in Taranaki to speak at his election launch, visit around, promote her recently published memoirs, et cetera. I was one of 110 people keen enough to brave a freezing night to observe this politician with a long game; good sense told us she was probably positioning for a post-election leadership run after Todd Muller was sacrificed on the altar of Ardern. Even if Collins can't out-Ardern her opponent come September, she'll hold on. Her strategy is one based on people's short memories for her missteps since she got into parliament 18 years ago. The National Party also seems temporarily to have lost its appetite for the youngish and the novel.
  • Enemy Or Ally? Senior Officials’ Perceptions of Ministerial Advisers Before and After MMP

    Enemy Or Ally? Senior Officials’ Perceptions of Ministerial Advisers Before and After MMP

    Enemy or ally? Senior officials’ perceptions of ministerial advisers before and after MMP (Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. 2006. ‘Enemy of Ally? Senior Officials’ Perceptions of Ministerial Advisers before and after MMP’, Political Science, 58(1): 3-23. Abstract There is now a well-established literature on the various second-order effects of the adoption of proportional representation in New Zealand. One feature of the contemporary executive landscape, however, remains substantially under- researched. This article reports on research regarding ministerial advisers in New Zealand Cabinet ministers’ offices. More specifically, it compares senior public servants’ current attitudes towards ministerial advisers with pre-MMP speculation regarding the possible future influence of such advisers. The article concludes that, while there are concerns about the possible long-term influence of political advisers, for the majority of senior officials, working relationships with ministerial advisers are positive and productive. Keywords ministerial advisers, MMP, politicisation, Cabinet, public service. Dr Chris Eichbaum, School of Government, Victoria University, Wellington ([email protected]). Chris Eichbaum is a Senior Lecturer in Public Policy at Victoria University’s School of Government. He has worked as a union official, a policy analyst in Canberra and Wellington, and a ministerial adviser in two New Zealand governments, most recently as Senior Adviser to the Hon. Steve Maharey (1999-2002) and as a Senior Policy Adviser in the Prime Minister’s Office (2002-2003). His research interests include the institutions of central banking, public sector governance, the roles and responsibilities of ministerial advisers, and contemporary social democratic politics and theory. Dr Richard Shaw, School of Sociology and Social Policy, Massey University, Palmerston North ([email protected]).
  • Television Reform Ir Broadcasting Blues Nem Zealand

    Television Reform Ir Broadcasting Blues Nem Zealand

    Television Reform ir Nem Zealand - l The underlying dilemma is the small j size o f the New Zealand market, which, Broadcasting Blues or Blue Sky? I with a population o f four million, j limits the profitability o f multiple The New Zealand television industry has a charter which requires it to fulfil various | television operators, and means been the subject o f various reforms since cultural objectives. Questions remain about \ funding o f local content and public 1999 dealing with local content, diversity of how the new charter obligations will be funded \ service broadcasting is an ongoing and programming, digital broadcasting, the role over the long term and whether TVNZ will be i difficult issue. of the public broadcaster and funding. Marion successful in balancing a public service role \ Jacka examines these developments, remarking with a commercial imperative. The government broadcasting between two organisations - TVNZ on the distinctive features of the New Zealand has declined to introduce mandatory local and NZ On Air - which would pursue each market and the commitment to social and content quotas and has opted instead for a self- of these objectives independently (Spicer et cultural objectives. regulatory scheme similar to the approach being a I 1996, p. 15). The public funding previously taken to New Zealand music on commercial allocated to BCNZ and collected in the form of Overview radio. a public broadcasting fee was transferred to NZ Many New Zealanders have the While there has been some dissatisfaction with On Air. The role of this agency was to promote broadcasting blues. They want TV and radio the pace of reform from the film and television universal access, 'minority programming', and of a higher calibre (Christchurch Press, 2 production industry and various commentators, programs which reflect New Zealand identity February 2000, p.
  • 2017ANNUAL Report

    2017ANNUAL Report

    The New Zealand Initiative ANNUAL REport 2017 The New Zealand Initiative Annual Report 2017 © The New Zealand Initiative 2018 Published by The New Zealand Initiative PO Box 10147 Wellington 6143 New Zealand www.nzinitiative.org.nz Designed by Angela Whitney, www.angelawhitney.com Printed by True North New Zealand Ltd Cover photo: Aerial of Waewaetorea Passage, Bay of Islands, New Zealand ii THE NEW ZEALAND INITIATIVE CONTENTS Foreword 03 Future of Recreational Fishing Public Meetings 24 What We Stand For 04 Lecture – Andrew Rowland 25 Our Principles 05 Discussion – Fonterra and Switzerland 25 Our Research 08 Welfare, Work and Wellbeing Panel Discussion 26 Our Engagement 14 The Future Catch Panel Discussion 27 Engagement with Members 15 Media 29 Annual Members’ Retreat 16 Highlights of Our Year 30 Go Swiss: Business Delegation to Switzerland 19 What Others Say About Us 42 Fisheries Delegation to Western Australia 20 Our Team 44 5th Anniversary 21 Our Board 48 Amplifying Excellence Panel Discussion 22 Our Members 50 Next Generation Debates 23 THE NEW ZEALAND INITIATIVE 01 “To gain a full understanding of the political and economic environment in New Zealand, it is essential to be open to ideas from all commentators. I have always included the research and reports of the New Zealand Initiative, and its predecessor, in the reading I follow so I can be confident I am being exposed to a full range of well-researched opinion and ideas.” Greg O’Connor, MP for Ōhāriu FOREWORD For us at The New Zealand Initiative, 2017 was an extra special year. We are particularly delighted that in 2017, New Zealand decided to We celebrated our fifth anniversary by producing more high-quality compensate the loss of earnings of live organ donors – a policy we had research.
  • Constitutional Nonsense? the ‘Unenforceable’ Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994, the Financial Management Reform, and New Zealand’S Developing Constitution

    Constitutional Nonsense? the ‘Unenforceable’ Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994, the Financial Management Reform, and New Zealand’S Developing Constitution

    CONSTITUTIONAL NONSENSE? THE ‘UNENFORCEABLE’ FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT 994, THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REFORM, AND NEW ZEALAND’S DEVELOPING CONSTITUTION CHYE-CHING HUANG* ‘Once again, in promoting this legislation New Zealand leads the world. This is pioneering legislation. It is distinctly New Zealand – style.’ (22 June 1994) 541 NZPD 2010 (Ruth Richardson) ‘[It] is constitutional nonsense. The notion that this Parliament will somehow bind future Governments on fiscal policy…is constitutional stupidity.’ (26 May 1994) 540 NZPD 1143 (Michael Cullen) The Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994 (the ‘FRA’) was part of New Zealand’s Financial Manage- ment Reform, a reform said to have introduced new values – efficiency, economy, effectiveness and choice – into the law.1 The FRA is peculiar because the courts may not be able to enforce it. Despite this, the authors of the FRA expected it to impact profoundly on the thinking and behav- iour of the executive, Parliament, and the electorate.2 The debate about how the FRA has affected the executive, Parliament, and the electorate con- tinues.3 Yet no one has analyzed thoroughly how the FRA has affected – or might affect – judicial reasoning.4 This article attempts that analysis, and concludes that the FRA may have profound legal and even constitutional effects, despite being ‘unenforceable’. The finding that the FRA may have legal and constitutional effects could be useful for two reasons. First, the FRA’s constitutional effects suggest that judicial reform of the constitution may tend to privilege the neo-liberal values that the Financial Management Reform wrote into law. Parliamentary sovereignty could be said to encourage a free and contestable market place of ideas, but this supposed strength may be paradoxically used to legally entrench values.
  • Education Legislation Amendment Bill a Concern As Far As 1

    Education Legislation Amendment Bill a Concern As Far As 1

    TEACH earn Thorough Education Achieved in a Caring Home I Number 12 January 1998 submissions made to this review g Education Legislation panel came from home educating t5 individuals and organisations (1 1 Amendment Bill a Concern as far as 1 ascertain). That I ~emesentsa hi& level of mlitical This Bill, if passed into law, will child and the learning envimn- involvement ihea you consider have an impact on the future of ment (our private homes) be in- home educated children make up home education in New Zealand. spected as part of the review pro- barely 1% of the school-aged pop- As many readers as possible must cess to ensure they are safe and ulation. In italics below is the make submissions on this Bill to secure. This seemed to be outside fllmmary comments of the panel the Science and Education Select the parameters of the Act which regdg home education (from Committee who are at present re- simply says that the child must be Austin Panel's report "Achieving viewing it. Relevant pahs of this "taught at least as regularly and Excellence": Bill and the Education Act plus well as in a registered school". commentary were included in the ~tro"~submissions were made by "Stop Press" of the TEACH Bul- The ERO itself was the subject of home schoolers that the current letin, Number 11 of November a Government review between restriction on access to private 1997 (if you would like more July and October 1997, by an in- homes should be retained. This copies, free of charge, please con- dependent panel of experts headed has the disadvantage ofprevent- tact the editor, or just photocopy by the Hon.
  • Well Being for Whanau and Family

    Well Being for Whanau and Family

    Monitoring the Impact of Social Policy, 1980–2001: Report on Significant Policy Events Occasional Paper Series Resource Report 1 Monitoring the Impact of Social Policy, 1980–2001: Report on Significant Policy Events Occasional Paper Series Resource Report 1 DECEMBER 2005 Stephen McTaggart1 Department of Sociology The University of Auckland 1 [email protected] Citation: McTaggart, S. 2005. Monitoring the Impact of Social Policy, 1980–2001: Report on Significant Policy Events. Wellington: SPEaR. Published in December 2005 by SPEaR PO Box 1556, Wellington, New Zealand ISBN 0-477-10012-0 (Book) ISBN 0-477-10013-9 (Internet) This document is available on the SPEaR website: Disclaimer The views expressed in this working paper are the personal views of the author and should not be taken to represent the views or policy of the Foundation of Research Science and Technology, the Ministry of Social Development, SPEaR, or the Government, past or present. Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information, no responsibility is accepted for the reliance by any person on any information contained in this working paper, nor for any error in or omission from the working paper. Acknowledgements The Family Whānau and Wellbeing Project was funded by the Foundation of Research, Science and Technology, New Zealand. Practical support from the Department of Statistics and the University of Auckland is also gratefully acknowledged. Thanks also to the members of the Family Whānau and Wellbeing Project team for their academic and technical support. The author would like to thank those who assisted with the report’s preparation.
  • New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual

    New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual

    IND 1 NEW ZEALAND HANSARD PRECEDENT MANUAL Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL The Precedent Manual shows how procedural events in the House appear in the Hansard report. It does not include events in Committee of the whole House on bills; they are covered by the Committee Manual. This manual is concerned with structure and layout rather than text - see the Style File for information on that. NB: The ways in which the House chooses to deal with procedural matters are many and varied. The Precedent Manual might not contain an exact illustration of what you are looking for; you might have to scan several examples and take parts from each of them. The wording within examples may not always apply. The contents of each section and, if applicable, its subsections, are included in CONTENTS at the front of the manual. At the front of each section the CONTENTS lists the examples in that section. Most sections also include box(es) containing background information; these boxes are situated at the front of the section and/or at the front of subsections. The examples appear in a column format. The left-hand column is an illustration of how the event should appear in Hansard; the right-hand column contains a description of it, and further explanation if necessary. At the end is an index. Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 3 INDEX Absence of Minister see Minister not present Amendment/s to motion Abstention/s ..........................................................VOT3-4 Address in reply ....................................................OP12 Acting Minister answers question.........................
  • Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd

    Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd

    DEPARTMENT 1-''N!wrnom: of the PRIME MINISTER .... ,,,., •J Economic and CABINET CROWN 0\\·0.:ERSHIP Development MONITORING UN IT Mallo / • Ohonga --------<-- Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd I Date: 17 May 2010 I Report No: I T201 0/784 Action Sought Action Sought Deadline Prime Minister Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon John Key) Minister of Finance Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon Bill English) Minister for Economic Development Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon Gerry Brownlee) Minister for State Owned Enterprises Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon Simon Power) Associate Minister of Finance Note contents of report None (Hon Steven Joyce) Contact for Telephone Discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone 1st Contact John Crawford General Manager, Crown [Withheld s9(2)(a)] ,/ Ownership and State Sector Performance I Chris White Advisor, Policy Advisory Group, [Withheld s9(2)(a)] DPMC I Peter Crabtree Director, Energy and [Withheld s9(2)(a)] Communications Branch, MED I Minister of Finance's Office Actions (if required) None. 7 May 2010 Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd Executive Summary Solid Energy have pitched an audacious (their language) vision for a majority state owned, diversified, natural resources company (Natural Resources Limited or NRL). They propose that the company should enjoy preferential rights of access to NZ’s hydrocarbon and mineral resources across all areas of its business, requiring significant changes to regulatory regimes. NRL would be built on top of Solid’s existing business and would retain all earnings to fund capex.