Sir Daniel Wilson and the Prehistoric Annals Of
DANIER SI L PREHISTORICE WILSOTH D NAN ANNALSF O SCOTLAND: A CENTENARY STUDY . DOUGLAbW y S SIMPSON, C.B.E., M.A., D.LITT., LL.D., F.S.A., F.S.A.SCOT. Read at the Annual General Meeting, 30th November, 1963 sciencey stude INth an always f i yo t i , srewardina g thing occasionall baco g ko yt d reaan d agai e greath n t classical treatises that have provide e foundatioth d n materia modere th r lfo n developmen subjecte th f o t . About such works there clings an indelible impression of youthful vigour and freshness, of the deployment of broad philosophical principles, in those happy days before our scientific disciplines becam boggeo es d dow technicalitiesn ni overweighteo s d an ,sheee th y rd b burde n of accumulated fact—t extene oth t thamodere th t n scientist, compelled inexorably to an ever-narrowing specialisation, is sometimes uncharitably described as knowing more and more about less and less. Moreover, the great nineteenth-century pioneers o ft disdaisciencno d writo t ndi e e literature marken i , d contras e moderth o t tn tendency to write jargon. Thus in archaeology, when we read about the cross- fertilisation and hybridisation of Beakers; when we find old and well-established terms such as Windmill Hill and Peterborough, Hallstatt and La Tene, superseded by letters of the alphabet, or even by letters and figures in a kind of pseudo-algebraical combination; when we are told that the Larnians were 'advanced enough in tech- nology croso t e Nort' th s h Channel—in other words, thed boats—wheyha e nw ladiesd ol fino , dtw though sacrificialle b o t t y burie prehistoria n di c hut, described, poor dears 'ideologicas a , l lubricants'—the begie nw wondeo nt r whethe writine rth g of book archaeologn so exercisn a ceases faie e yha b th r literatureo n edt n i o s i d an , road to becoming what a seventeenth-century critic described as 'the obfuscation of understanding'.
[Show full text]