“Toronto Has No History!”: Indigeneity, Settler Colonialism, and Historical Memory in Canada’S Largest City

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Toronto Has No History!”: Indigeneity, Settler Colonialism, and Historical Memory in Canada’S Largest City Document generated on 09/24/2021 7:42 a.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine “Toronto Has No History!” Indigeneity, Settler Colonialism, and Historical Memory in Canada’s Largest City Victoria Freeman Encounters, Contests, and Communities: New Histories of Race and Article abstract Ethnicity in the Canadian City In 1884, during a week-long commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of Volume 38, Number 2, printemps 2010 Toronto’s incorporation in 1834, tens of thousands celebrated Toronto’s history and its relation to British colonialism and imperialism. The author’s analysis of URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/039672ar the historical tableaux in the first day’s parade and speeches by Daniel Wilson, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/039672ar president of University College, and Chief Samson Green of the Tyendinaga Mohawks reveals divergent approaches to commemoration as “politics by other means”: on one hand, the erasure of the area’s Indigenous past and the See table of contents celebration of its European future, on the other, an idealized view of the past of Indigenous–settler partnership that ignores the role of local settlers in the dispossession of the Mississaugas. The 1884 commemoration marks the Publisher(s) transition from the founding of the settlement in 1793 to its incorporation in 1834 as the city’s “founding moment” and marker of the assumed “indigeneity” Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine of settler-immigrants. The deed acquired from the Mississaugas in the Toronto Purchase of 1787 is deemed irrelevant, while the 1834 Act of Incorporation ISSN becomes the symbolic deed to Toronto’s modernity. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Freeman, V. (2010). “Toronto Has No History!”: Indigeneity, Settler Colonialism, and Historical Memory in Canada’s Largest City. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 38(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.7202/039672ar Tous droits réservés © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 2010 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ “Toronto Has No History!” Indigeneity, Settler Colonialism, and Historical Memory in Canada’s Largest City Victoria Freeman In 1884, during a week-long commemoration of the fiftieth anniver- Pungent smoke rising from an abalone shell and fanned by an eagle sary of Toronto’s incorporation in 1834, tens of thousands celebrated feather marked the beginning of the official celebration of the 175th Toronto’s history and its relation to British colonialism and impe- anniversary of the incorporation of the City of Toronto on Friday, 6 rialism. The author’s analysis of the historical tableaux in the first March 2009. Before a sparse crowd at Nathan Phillips Square, Peter day’s parade and speeches by Daniel Wilson, president of University Schuler, an elder of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation, College, and Chief Samson Green of the Tyendinaga Mohawks reveals explained the meaning of the smudging ceremony as a ritual of purifica- divergent approaches to commemoration as “politics by other means”: tion and then offered “a history lesson.” He explained that according to on one hand, the erasure of the area’s Indigenous past and the celebra- tradition Toronto had been one of the stopping places of his ancestors tion of its European future, on the other, an idealized view of the past on the Great Migration of the Anishinaabeg from the east coast.1 “We of Indigenous–settler partnership that ignores the role of local settlers stayed quite a while,’ he added, but “in 1847 we were removed from in the dispossession of the Mississaugas. The 1884 commemoration this place.” He paused before continuing somewhat bemusedly: “I’m marks the transition from the founding of the settlement in 1793 to its asked to come and celebrate this city but the city itself kind of moved incorporation in 1834 as the city’s “ founding moment” and marker of us out.” the assumed “indigeneity” of settler-immigrants. The deed acquired This was an assertion of a history that remains unknown to most Toron- from the Mississaugas in the Toronto Purchase of 1787 is deemed irrel- tonians, who generally seem to reflect the attitude that Toronto has little evant, while the 1834 Act of Incorporation becomes the symbolic deed history worth remembering . and certainly very little Indigenous his- to Toronto’s modernity. tory worth remembering. History does not form a large part of the city’s urban mythology or tourism promotion, and there is no museum or En 1884, au cours d’une semaine complète d’événements commémo- large-scale institution devoted to the whole span of the city’s history or rant le 50e anniversaire de l’incorporation de Toronto en 1834, des that situates the history of Toronto in a larger context. While Indigenous dizaines de milliers de gens fêtent l’histoire de Toronto et sa relation people have lived in the Toronto region for at least eleven thousand avec le colonialisme et l’impérialisme britannique. Une analyse des years and the original peoples who have made this territory their home fresques historiques du défilé de la première journée des célébrations over the last several hundred years have included the Wendats (Hurons), et de discours prononcés par Daniel Wilson, président de l’University Tionnontati (Petuns), Senecas, and Mississaugas (Ojibwa, Chippewa, College, et par le chef de Samson Green des Mohawks de Tyendinaga Anishinaabeg), there is “little widespread awareness of the depth of this dévoile de divergentes approches relatives à la commémoration pre-contact settlement history, or general knowledge of the societies comme « politique par d’autres moyens » : d’une part, le camou- that inhabited Ontario prior to the onset of Euro-Canadian settlement,” flage du passé indigène de la région et la célébration de son avenir according to a report prepared for the city in 2004.2 Even rarer is the européen, de l’autre, une vision idéalisée du partenariat passé entre admission by non-Indigenous Torontonians that colonialism has shaped peuples autochtones et colons qui ignore la rôle de ces derniers dans la both the city’s history and public memory of the region’s past. dépossession des Indiens de Mississauga. La commémoration de 1884 Yet, as Jordan Stanger-Ross, Coll Thrush, Penelope Edmonds, and marque la transition entre la fondation du village en 1793 et l’incor- others have documented, urban or municipal colonialism has been a poration de la ville en 1834 comme « moment fondateur » et symbole key element of the settler colonial project.3 Indeed, the settler colonial de la supposée « autochtonie » des colons immigrants. Le titre de city has often been viewed by colonizers and colonized alike as the propriété acquis des Mississaugas lors de l’achat de Toronto en 1787 “consummation of empire.”4 Cities have been seen as the “ultimate est jugé sans importance, tandis que la Loi d’incorporation de 1834 avatars of . progress, representing the pinnacle of technology, com- devient l’acte symbolique de la modernité de Toronto. merce, and cultural sophistication,” at the same time as they have obliterated the Indigenous landscape of the past.5 Because cities have been hubs of broader networks of power, engines driving regional 21 Urban History Review / Revue d’histoire urbaine Vol. XXXViII, No. 2 (Spring 2010 printemps) “Toronto Has No History!” economies, and places where settler populations and resources were Cities, no less than nations, articulate founding moments in their concentrated, cities have been important sites where colonial relations efforts to define themselves. The vision of the past articulated through were enacted6 and have played a major role in the development and commemoration is guided by the needs of the present, as Harold diffusion of national, colonial, and imperial ideas and practices.7 In fact, Berubé’s contrast of the commemorative practices of Montreal and as Stanger-Ross and Edmonds have argued, the social, political, and Toronto illustrates; each city turned to the “first moments” that best cultural processes of urban development have themselves constituted articulated current sensibilities and aspirations.18 What is interesting a specific modality of colonialism.8 Recent studies of colonial processes about Toronto’s history of civic commemoration is that the “founding in Seattle, Edmonton, Victoria, Vancouver, and Melbourne have dem- moment” celebrated has generally not been the European founding of onstrated that different urban settings produced very different colonial the settlement in 1793 but the city’s incorporation in 1834. The shift in landscapes and spatial politics, which in some instances were distinct the “founding moment” from 1793 to 1834 appears to have occurred from larger regional or national dynamics.9 As Edmonds notes, “These at the 1884 semi-centennial, which was the first major commemora- varying colonial economic and discursive formations came to frame tive event in the city’s history. Civic leaders chose to commemorate particular Indigenous subjectivities and their representations.”10 All of Toronto’s status as the
Recommended publications
  • The Scottish Roots of English Studies in Canada
    The Dream of Empire: The Scottish Roots of English Studies in Canada SARAH PHILLIPS CASTEEL T XHE LAST FIFTEEN years have seen the publication of a num• ber of histories of English Studies in Canada which depart from earlier discussions by focusing on disciplinary formation rather than on the history of a specific institution (Tayler; Johnson; Murray; Hubert). This new orientation has brought to light some of the social undercurrents that propelled the formation of the discipline of English in the emerging society of nine• teenth-century colonial Canada. Yet surprisingly, these disci• plinary histories largely neglect the significant links between the rise of English Studies and the history of British imperialism that have recently been identified by scholars such as Gauri Viswanathan and Robert Crawford. This limitation is best illustrated by the treatment of the Scot• tish legacy in the histories of the discipline. Most scholars of Canadian English Studies readily acknowledge the dispropor• tionate impact of Scottish immigrants on the formation of Canadian universities, and especially on the growth of rhetoric and of modern languages departments. Some have in fact made the Scottish contribution the focus of their studies (Masters; Tayler). Such scholars call attention to the deep-rooted divi• sions between English Anglican and Scottish Presbyterian edu• cators that patterned the Canadian educational system and determined the place of English Studies in that system, as the English emphasis on a classical curriculum came up against the more utilitarian Scottish approach. Yet these accounts fail to consider in any depth how a long and fraught history of Anglo- Scottish relations informed the Scottish immigrants' debate with English educators in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation of Professor Donald C. Ainslie
    Installation of Professor Donald C. Ainslie Sixteenth PrinciPal of UniverSity college Installation of the Principal The audience will rise when the procession enters East Hall, led by bedel Victoria Hurlihey, President of the University College Alumni Association. Welcoming Remarks Cheryl Misak Vice-President & Provost, University of Toronto President’s Remarks Thursday, David Naylor December 1, 2011 at 3:10 p.m. President, University of Toronto University College, East Hall Oath of Office University of Toronto David Naylor Donald C. Ainslie Robing of the Principal Shelley Cornack Registrar, University College Gillian Einstein Professor of Psychology, University College David Rayside Professor of Political Science, University College Philip Sohm cover image: University Professor of Art & Vice-Principal, University College A Not Unsightly Building: University College and Its History by Douglas Richardson (page 140). Photograph by James A. Chalmers. Presentation of Greetings The Principals of University College Judy G. Goldring University College was established in 1853. Until 1901, Presidents of Vice-Chair, Governing Council the University of Toronto were also Presidents of University College. Meric Gertler 1853 – 1880 John McCaul Dean, Faculty of Arts & Science 1880 – 1892 Sir Daniel Wilson Anne Lancashire 1892 – 1901 James Loudon Professor of English, University College 1901 – 1928 Maurice Hutton Rose Wolfe 1928 – 1944 Malcolm William Wallace University College Distinguished Alumna & Chancellor Emerita, 1944 – 1945 Sidney Earle Smith University of Toronto 1945 – 1951 William Robert Taylor 1951 – 1959 Francois Charles Achille Jeanneret Michael Galang President, University College Literary & Athletic Society 1959 – 1963 Moffatt St. Andrew Woodside 1964 – 1970 Douglas Valentine LePan Introduction of the Principal 1970 – 1977 Archibald Cameron Hollis Hallett Cheryl Misak 1977 – 1989 George Peter Richardson Installation Address 1989 – 1997 Lynd Wilks Forguson Donald C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Daniel Wilson and the Prehistoric Annals Of
    DANIER SI L PREHISTORICE WILSOTH D NAN ANNALSF O SCOTLAND: A CENTENARY STUDY . DOUGLAbW y S SIMPSON, C.B.E., M.A., D.LITT., LL.D., F.S.A., F.S.A.SCOT. Read at the Annual General Meeting, 30th November, 1963 sciencey stude INth an always f i yo t i , srewardina g thing occasionall baco g ko yt d reaan d agai e greath n t classical treatises that have provide e foundatioth d n materia modere th r lfo n developmen subjecte th f o t . About such works there clings an indelible impression of youthful vigour and freshness, of the deployment of broad philosophical principles, in those happy days before our scientific disciplines becam boggeo es d dow technicalitiesn ni overweighteo s d an ,sheee th y rd b burde n of accumulated fact—t extene oth t thamodere th t n scientist, compelled inexorably to an ever-narrowing specialisation, is sometimes uncharitably described as knowing more and more about less and less. Moreover, the great nineteenth-century pioneers o ft disdaisciencno d writo t ndi e e literature marken i , d contras e moderth o t tn tendency to write jargon. Thus in archaeology, when we read about the cross- fertilisation and hybridisation of Beakers; when we find old and well-established terms such as Windmill Hill and Peterborough, Hallstatt and La Tene, superseded by letters of the alphabet, or even by letters and figures in a kind of pseudo-algebraical combination; when we are told that the Larnians were 'advanced enough in tech- nology croso t e Nort' th s h Channel—in other words, thed boats—wheyha e nw ladiesd ol fino , dtw though sacrificialle b o t t y burie prehistoria n di c hut, described, poor dears 'ideologicas a , l lubricants'—the begie nw wondeo nt r whethe writine rth g of book archaeologn so exercisn a ceases faie e yha b th r literatureo n edt n i o s i d an , road to becoming what a seventeenth-century critic described as 'the obfuscation of understanding'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hiring of James Mark Baldwin and James Gibson Hume at Toronto in 1889
    History of Psychology Copyright 2004 by the Educational Publishing Foundation 2004, Vol. 7, No. 2, 130–153 1093-4510/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1093-4510.7.2.130 THE HIRING OF JAMES MARK BALDWIN AND JAMES GIBSON HUME AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IN 1889 Christopher D. Green York University In 1889, George Paxton Young, the University of Toronto’s philosophy professor, passed away suddenly while in the midst of a public debate over the merits of hiring Canadians in preference to American and British applicants for faculty positions. As a result, the process of replacing Young turned into a continuation of that argument, becoming quite vociferous and involving the popular press and the Ontario gov- ernment. This article examines the intellectual, political, and personal dynamics at work in the battle over Young’s replacement and its eventual resolution. The outcome would have an impact on both the Canadian intellectual scene and the development of experimental psychology in North America. In 1889 the University of Toronto was looking to hire a new professor of philosophy. The normally straightforward process of making a university appoint- ment, however, rapidly descended into an unseemly public battle involving not just university administrators, but also the highest levels of the Ontario govern- ment, the popular press, and the population of the city at large. The debate was not pitched solely, or even primarily, at the level of intellectual issues, but became intertwined with contentious popular questions of nationalism, religion, and the proper place of science in public education. The impact of the choice ultimately made would reverberate not only through the university and through Canada’s broader educational establishment for decades to come but, because it involved James Mark Baldwin—a man in the process of becoming one of the most prominent figures in the study of the mind—it also rippled through the nascent discipline of experimental psychology, just then gathering steam in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daniel Wilson Scrapbook
    The Daniel Wilson Scrapbook Illustrations of Edinburgh and other material collected by Sir Daniel Wilson, some of which he used in his Memorials of Edinburgh in the olden time (Edin., 1847). The following list gives possible sources for the items; some prints were published individually as well as appearing as part of larger works. References are also given to their use in Memorials. Quick-links within this list: Box I Box II Box III Abbreviations and notes Arnot: Hugo Arnot, The History of Edinburgh (1788). Bann. Club: Bannatyne Club. Beattie, Caledonia illustrated: W. Beattie, Caledonia illustrated in a series of views [ca. 1840]. Beauties of Scotland: R. Forsyth, The Beauties of Scotland (1805-8). Billings: R.W. Billings, The Baronial and ecclesiastical Antiquities of Scotland (1845-52). Black (1843): Black’s Picturesque tourist of Scotland (1843). Black (1859): Black’s Picturesque tourist of Scotland (1859). Edinburgh and Mid-Lothian (1838). Drawings by W.B. Scott, engraved by R. Scott. Some of the engravings are dated 1839. Edinburgh delineated (1832). Engravings by W.H. Lizars, mostly after drawings by J. Ewbank. They are in two series, each containing 25 numbered prints. See also Picturesque Views. Geikie, Etchings: Walter Geikie, Etchings illustrative of Scottish character and scenery, new edn [1842?]. Gibson, Select Views: Patrick Gibson, Select Views in Edinburgh (1818). Grose, Antiquities: Francis Grose, The Antiquities of Scotland (1797). Hearne, Antiquities: T. Hearne, Antiquities of Great Britain illustrated in views of monasteries, castles and churches now existing (1807). Heriot’s Hospital: Historical and descriptive account of George Heriot’s Hospital. With engravings by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettertohongwros00wils.Pdf
    A LETTER THE HON. G. W. ROSS, LL.D. MINISTER OF EDUCATION, WITH RESOLUTIONS AiND LETTERS From the Board of Trustees, The Faculty, Heads of Universities, Graduates, &c, IN APPROVAL OF COLLEGE RESIDENCE. SIR DANIEL WILSON, LL.D., F.R.S.E PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. ROWSELL & HUTCHISON, PRINTERS, 1890. F%tt CANAt)IANA Chancellor COLLGCTiON Richardson mUiccvt'c?S Memorial V r*™ Fund UNivensiTy AT RiNQSTON ONTARIO CANADA The EDITH and LORNE PIERCE COLLECTION of CANADIANA Queen's University at Kingston A LETTER TO THE HON. G. W. ROSS, LL.D., MINISTER OF EDUCATION, WITH RESOLUTIONS AND LETTERS From the Board of Trustees, The Faculty, Heads of Universities, Graduates, &c, IN APPROVAL OF COLLEGE RESIDENCE. SIR DANIEL WILSON, LL.D., F.R.S.E., PPvESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. > ROWSELL & HUTCHISON, PRINTERS, 1890. — ; College Residence. University College, Toronto, 18th March, 1890. To the Hon. 0. W. Ross, LL.D., Minister of Education ; Dear Sir : I beg leave to ask your careful perusal of the accompanying documents : including resolutions embodying the opinion of the Board of Trustees ; of the subscribers for the restoration of the Library ; and of Graduates who have not been themselves in Residence. I also submit to you letters addressed to me by parents of Students who have boarded in the College Residence and by Graduates who have themselves resided there, and are able to give their matured judgment on the influence of residence on student life. The Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor are also strongly opposed to the idea of doing away with this important branch of the University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Institute and the Origins of the Ontario Archaeological Tradition 1851-1884
    KILLAN: THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE 3 THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE ONTARIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRADITION 1851-1884 Gerald Killan ABSTRACT Although David Boyle (1842-1911) is credited with fully developing the Classificatory- Descriptive Period of Ontario archaeology after 1884, his precursors at the Canadian Institute laid the foundation for a scientific archaeological tradition in Ontario. Between 1851 and 1884 Institute members tried to replace the purely speculative and antiquarian approach to archaeology by articulating a scientific rationale for the emerging discipline, by introducing advanced methods and procedures, and by opening the pages of the Canadian Journal to those influences giving rise to a scientific archaeology on both sides of the Atlantic. The first attempts to establish an Ontario archaeological museum and to undertake site inventory also occurred in this period. INTRODUCTION Ontario archaeologists are generally aware that during the second half of the nineteenth century, the Canadian Institute in Toronto played a noteworthy role in the development of their discipline. It was under the auspices of this organization, for instance, that David Boyle originally established his Ontario Archaeological Museum and launched what has been properly described as "the first archeological work in Ontario which may safely be called scientific" (Kidd 1952:71; Noble 1972:16). While Boyles invaluable contributions have been briefly acknowledged in the several short historical surveys of Canadian archaeological endeavour Jenness
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Wilson and the Scottish Enlightenment*
    Proc Soc Aniiq Scot, 122 (1992), 55-75 Daniel ScottisWilsoe th d nan h Enlightenment* Bruce G Triggerf ABSTRACT The career Danielof Wilson (1816-1892), English-speakingthe world's first scientific archaeologist, embraced continentstwo other drewhis and artist,on skills an as antiquarian, anthropologist, universityand teacher. While Wilson's approach archaeologyto basedthe was on Scandinavianworkthe of archaeologists Christian Thomsen Jensand Worsaae, understandinghis of human behaviour was shaped by the popular culture of early 19th-century Edinburgh, especially thinkingthe Scottishof primitivists Commonand Sense philosophers romanticismthe and Sir of Walter Scott. Like 18th-century Enlightenment philosophers, Wilson believed in cultural evolution but retained a creationist view of human origins and regarded human nature as unchanging. He reluctantly accepted biological evolution, but his refusal to adopt an evolutionary view of the origin of the human mind led him to reject the racism that was introduced into studies of cultural evolution Darwiniansby such Johnas Lubbock. advocatingBy integrationthe aboriginalof peoples into what hopedhe would become multiraciala society Northin America, Wilson continued championto concepts the Enlightenment the of timea at when such ideals becomehad unfashionable. INTRODUCTION Comparing Daniel Wilson's Prehistoric Man, publishe 1862n di , with John Lubbock's Pre- historic Times, which appeared three years later, one is struck by their contrasting views of aboriginal peoples. Lubbock portrayed such peoples as dirty, ignorant, and immoral savages, and lifs hi resee fo f considereth ro t d thebiologicalle b mo t y incapabl f adaptineo modero gt n wayd san hence doomed to extinction or permanent subordination as European civilization and settlement spread roun globee dth .
    [Show full text]
  • Langton (John) Family, Sir Daniel Wilson Diary (1853-1892)
    LETTERS AND JOURNALS OP SIR DANIEL WILSON Notes I. Way in which the style of the main building was evolved - Cumberland designed a Victorian Gothic building. Sir Edmund Hoad wanted a round-arched Italian building, probably Renaissance. Cumberland compromised on the present style, which Lord xXifferin called ’’Norman-Gothic". II. Sir Daniel V/ilson designed the large window on the front. This he told W.A.L. himself. III. Sir Daniel Wilson also added the four lumps at the top of the tower at the corners ( see original sketch of elevation without them). IV. Sir John A. .Macdonald’s mot was the advice "to put the University endowment into a building — even a Methodist can’t steal bricks and mortar." LETTERS Al© JOURl^ALS OF SIR DANIEL WILSON LETTERS December 29, 1851. To his wife: After chaffing her about the difficulty he finds in filling a large sheet in a letter to her, and reminding her of the long ones she used to write in the days of their engagement, which she probably could not do now any more than he himself, ho says: I do not conclude on that account that you loved me better than you do now, after a dozen years of wedded life. But you and I were then two distinct people. Our sympathies were not without their influence on each other, but after all they moved in very different circles, and so we communicated like the plenipotentiaries of two friendly powers — not without sundry jealousies and threats of war -- but upon the whole, with a very kindly regard to the recognized design of mutual alliance and projected league, offensive and defensive, against all the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scotsman and Education
    THE SCOTSMAN AND EDUCATION II7imylA grcidhg phgh 'ml7~hteaiRm dmu, Or filler of tfic hrrritrq sq OF jiniJling gold in G~eacrz' loon, Or Snd ~ui'herd or pit~~~rb'~rmk Or matfp rkrk in fur m~tnirig~ Or pmitrERirrtu: Inirtl: o' Linniadecr ,- l?~COFP~. Iotlr, W ingle ?IIL~X', The .'7cr~hmrr~1'wnmr, tcim'm $6 np5r, In no' ftrr /me his spw~'nmd bttkt-. Anon. T has been tmly said that perhaps the strongest I instinct of the Scotrisl~people is that wcl l-known intense craving which they have cver hacl for know- ledge and learning. This instinct is not limited to llle scholarly class alone, but is widely sharcrl by the whole people to a greater extent thnn is found in any other nation throughout the ~~orld. It is especially strong in the natures of the pat fin,mcial advcnturers in tlrc Old Sk'orld and ,the Colonies. This accounts for the fact that so many of them, like -4ndrew Camegie, Lord Strathcona, and Sir Will iarn Macdonald, have endo\ved learn- ing and lilerature so largely. It was no uncommon a65 thing to find among the necessarily limited personal effects of an early pioneer Scottish merchant of Quebec, Hurlson Day, or Virginia, of the cigl~tclcnth century, a number of well-chosen and well-thumbed volumes of the classics. Even such a writer as Horaec was not excluded. many of these men Icd livcs of hard, exacting, material, count ing-housc toil. They ~vercmen in whom, from all appcaranccs, literary inclinations wcrc rErc last thing to be ex- pectcd.
    [Show full text]
  • To View a PDF Copy of the Book 100 Years of Biochemistry at Uoft
    100 Years of Biochemistry at the University of Toronto 1908 - 2008 An Illustrated History by Marian A. Packham University Professor Emeritus ii 100 YEARS OF BIOCHEMISTRY AT U OF T 1908-2008 MARIAN A. PACKHAM arian Packham is one of the world's leading authorities on the biochem istry and Mphysiology of blood platelets, publishing close to 300 papers and is credited with major contriburions to the understanding of plarelets and their role in heart attacks and strokes. She received her B.A. in Biochemistry from the University of Toronto in 1949 and her Ph.D. in 1954 under the supervision of Gordon Butler. From 1955 to 1963 she was a Part-time Senior Fellow/Lecturer in the Department. Prof Packham re-joined the Department in 1966 as a Lecturer. She is a University Professor Emeritus and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Prof Packham is also the official historian of the Department of Biochemistry. Marian Packham with biography orRosalind Franklin • 100 YEARS OF BIOCHEMISTRY AT U OF T 1908-2008 Printed in Canada by University of Toronto Press 200S ISBN 97S-0-7727 -1700-9 Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Packham, Marian A. (Marian Aitchison), 1927- 100 years of biochemistry at the University of Toronto, 1905-200S : an illustrated history / by Marian A. Packham. ISBN 97S-0-7727-1700-9 1. University of Toronto. Dept. of Biochemistry--History. I. University of Toronto. Dept. of Biochemistry II. Title. III. Title: One hundred years of biochemistry at the University of Toronto, 1905-200S. QP511.5.C3P33200S 572'.0711713541
    [Show full text]
  • James Loudon Personal Records
    University of Toronto Archives and Records Management Services JAMES LOUDON PERSONAL RECORDS B1972-0031 Revised, May 2003 © University of Toronto Archives University of Toronto Archives B1972-0031 James Loudon Table of Contents 2 University of Toronto Archives B1972-0031 James Loudon Scope and Content Records, textual; 1885-1916; 3.66 m. This accession consists primarily of the professional records of James Loudon as professor and subsequently president of the University of Toronto (1892-1906) who died in 1916. Dr. Esther Loudon donated it to the University of Toronto Library in 1964. The accession has been arranged into fifteen record series, the largest contains administrative files of the Office of the President comprised mainly of correspondence. The following is a full listing of record series: Series 1: Office of the President. Administrative Files. Series 2: General Correspondence. Series 3: Correspondence Files. Series 4: Correspondence Files. Series 5: Office of the President. Administrative Files: Applications, Recommendations and Appointments. Series 6: Scholarships. Series 7: Addresses. Series 8: Lecture Notes, Papers and Manuscripts. Series 9: Orders in Council/ Government Legislation. Series 10: Personal Correspondence. Series 11: Appointment Books. Series 12: Diplomas. Series 13: Miscellaneous. Series 14: File Index. Series 15: Artifacts. A file index, Series 14, was created by James Loudon as an aid in preparing his memoirs. The number/letter scheme appearing in the lower right hand corner (e.g. [A.1]) was added by librarians as a further aid to the arrangement of the files after their donation to the university. These have been indicated in the following record series. Later attempts at arrangement were made and abandoned by University Archives staff.
    [Show full text]