DOCSLIB.ORG

Ain Jalut a TURNING POINT in WORLD HISTORY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ain Jalut a TURNING POINT in WORLD HISTORY Ain Jalut A TURNING POINT IN WORLD HISTORY ¨ ¨ IERCE mounted warriors swept out of Hulegu, the Mongol general, demanded F Mongolia, laying waste every city that re- that Sultan al-Muzaffar Sayf al-Din Qutuz, fused to surrender. In February 1258, they the¨ Muslim¨ ruler of Egypt, also yield to them. unleashed their fury against Baghdad and Hulegu threatened that if he did not,¨ Egypt¨ breached its walls. They murdered and pil- would suffer dire consequences. Hulegu’s laged for a week. The whole Islamic world forces outnumbered the Egyptian army of trembled in fear of the Mongols. 20,000 by some 15 to 1. “The Muslim world In January 1260, as the Mongols moved stood face to face with extinction,” says Pro- westward, Aleppo, Syria, met the same fate fessor Nazeer Ahmed, a historian of Islam. as Baghdad. In March, Damascus opened its What was Sultan Qutuz to do? gates to the Mongols and surrendered. Short- Qutuz and the Mamluks ly afterward, the Mongols took the Palestin- Qutuz was a Mamluk, a slave of Turkish ian cities of Nablus (near the site of ancient origin. The Mamluks had served as soldier- Shechem) and Gaza. slaves for the Ayyubid sultans of Cairo, Egypt. In 1250, however, those slaves over- For more information on the Mongols and their con- quests, see the May 2008 issue of Awake! threw their masters and became the rulers of Damascus Site of the ancient city of Megiddo SYRIA Mt. Tabor Ain Jalut Plain of Esdraelon (near Megiddo) Nablus (Shechem) Jerusalem Gaza EGYPT Egypt. Qutuz, himself a former soldier-slave, tendom. From them, Qutuz sought safe pas- subsequently seized power and became sul- sage and the right to buy supplies in order to tanin1259.Hewasaskilledwarriorwho engage the Mongols in war in Palestine. The was not about to give up without a fight. His crusaders consented. Qutuz, after all, was the prospects for defeating the Mongols, how- only hope the crusaders had of ridding the ever, seemed bleak. But then began a series of area of the Mongols, who were as much of a events that would shape history. worry to them as they were to the Muslims. ¨ ¨ ¨ Word reached HuleguthatMongke, the As a result, the stage was set for a decisive Mongol great khan, had died in distant Mon- clash between the Mamluks and the Mongols. golia. Foreseeing a power struggle back ¨ ¨ home, Hulegu withdrew with most of his Ain Jalut in Palestine army. He left behind between 10,000 and 20,- ThearmiesoftheMamluksandtheMon- 000 troops—sufficient, he thought, to com- gols met in September 1260 at Ain Jalut on plete the conquest of Egypt. Qutuz now per- the Plain of Esdraelon. It is believed that Ain ceived that the tide had turned in his favor. He Jalut lay near the ancient city of Megiddo. determined that if he was to defeat the invad- Historian Rashid al-Din says that the ers, this was his opportunity to do so. MamluksdrewtheMongolsintoanambush Lying between Egypt and the Mongols, Because many decisive battles were fought in this area, the however, was another enemy of the Muslims word “Megiddo” became identified with the well-known bat- —the crusader forces that had come to Pal- tle called Armageddon—Hebrew Har–Magedon. The Bible asso- ciates Armageddon with “the battle of that great day of God estine to claim the “Holy Land” for Chris- Almighty.”—Revelation 16:14, 16, Authorized Version. ThearmiesoftheMamluksandtheMongolsmetin September 1260 at Ain Jalut, on the Plain of Esdraelon 13 ¨ ¨ at Megiddo. Qutuz hid most of his cavalry in again could they threaten Egypt. Hulegu’s de- the hills around the plain and ordered a small scendants settled in Persia, converted to Is- force forward in order to provoke a Mongol lam, and in time became patrons of Islamic attack. The Mongols believed that they had culture. Their territories came to be known the whole Mamluk army before them, so they as the Persian ilkhanate, that is, “subordinate charged. Qutuz then sprang his trap. He or- khanate.” dered reserve units to gallop out of their hid- Qutuz did not enjoy his victory for long. ing places and attack the Mongol flanks. The He was killed by his rivals shortly afterward. invaders were defeated. Among such rivals was Baybars I, the first This was the first Mongol defeat since they sultan of a reunited kingdom of Egypt and had launched their westward thrust out of Syria. Many considered him the ruler who Mongolia 43 years earlier. Though the num- was the real founder of the Mamluk regime. ber of troops involved was relatively small, His new state—well-run and wealthy—lasted Ain Jalut is considered to be one of history’s two and a half centuries, until 1517. most significant battles. It spared Muslims During that period of approximately 250 from annihilation, broke the perception of years, the Mamluks ousted the crusaders Mongol invincibility, and allowed the Mam- luk army to retake lost territories. from the Holy Land, encouraged trade and industry, patronized the arts, and built hospi- Ain Jalut’s Aftermath tals, mosques, and schools. Under their rule, The Mongols returned to the area of Syria Egypt became the unrivaled center of the and Palestine a number of times, but never Muslim world. The battle of Ain Jalut affect- ed more than the Middle East. The ruins of the ancient city of Shechem, It also set the course of Western with a portion of the modern city of Nablus in the background civilization. “Had the Mongols succeeded in conquering Egypt, they might have been able, fol- ¨ ¨ lowing the return of Hulegu, to carry on across North Africa to the Straits of Gibraltar,” says the magazine Saudi Aramco World. Since, in the meantime, the Mon- gols had also reached Poland, they would have held Europe in a giant pincer. “Under such circumstances, would the European Renaissance have occurred?” asks the same magazine. “The world today might have been a considerably different place.”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sultan, the Tyrant, and the Hero: Changing Medieval Perceptions of Al-Zahir Baybars (MSR IV, 2000)
    AMINA A. ELBENDARY AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO The Sultan, The Tyrant, and The Hero: Changing Medieval Perceptions of al-Z˛a≠hir Baybars* As the true founder of the Mamluk state, al-Z˛a≠hir Baybars is one of the most important sultans of Egypt and Syria. This has prompted many medieval writers and historians to write about his reign. Their perceptions obviously differed and their reconstructions of his reign draw different and often conflicting images. In this article I propose to examine and compare the various perceptions that different writers had of Baybars's life and character. Each of these writers had his own personal biases and his own purposes for writing about Baybars. The backgrounds against which they each lived and worked deeply influenced their writings. This led them to emphasize different aspects of his personality and legacy and to ignore others. Comparing these perceptions will demonstrate how the historiography of Baybars was used to make different political arguments concerning the sultan, the Mamluk regime, and rulership in general. I have used different representative examples of thirteenth- to fifteenth-century histories, chronicles, and biographical dictionaries in compiling this material. I have also compared these scholarly writings to the popular folk epic S|rat al-Z˛a≠hir Baybars. In his main official biography, written by Muh˛y| al-D|n ibn ‘Abd al-Z˛a≠hir, Baybars is presented as an ideal sultan. By contrast, works written after the sultan's day show more ambivalent attitudes towards him. Some fourteenth-century writers, like Sha≠fi‘ ibn ‘Al|, Baybars al-Mans˝u≠r|, and al-Nuwayr|, who were influenced by the regime of al-Na≠s˝ir Muh˛ammad, tend to place more emphasis on his despotic actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 04/10/2021 06:40:30
    Mamluk cavalry practices: Evolution and influence Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Nettles, Isolde Betty Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 06:40:30 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289748 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this roproduction is dependent upon the quaiity of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that tfie author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g.. maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal secttons with small overlaps. Photograpiis included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrattons appearing in this copy for an additk)nal charge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a Study of Their Relations, 1220-1335
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2012 The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a study of their relations, 1220-1335. Lauren Prezbindowski University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Prezbindowski, Lauren, "The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a study of their relations, 1220-1335." (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1152. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1152 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILKHANID MONGOLS, THE CHRISTIAN ARMENIANS, AND THE ISLAMIC MAMLUKS: A STUDY OF THEIR RELATIONS, 1220-1335 By Lauren Prezbindowski B.A., Hanover College, 2008 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Louisville December 2012 THE ILKHANID MONGOLS, THE CHRISTIAN ARMENIANS, AND THE ISLAMIC MAMLUKS: A STUDY OF THEIR RELATIONS, 1220-1335 By Lauren Prezbindowski B.A., Hanover College, 2008 A Thesis Approved on November 15,2012 By the following Thesis Committee: Dr. John McLeod, Thesis Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetics of Islamic Architecture & the Exuberance of Mamluk Design
    The Aesthetics of Islamic Architecture & The Exuberance of Mamluk Design Tarek A. El-Akkad Dipòsit Legal: B. 17657-2013 ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s’autoritza la presentació del s eu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tesisenred.net) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Mamluk Legitimacy and the Mongols: the Reign of Baybars and Qalawun
    ANNE F. BROADBRIDGE THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Mamluk Legitimacy and the Mongols: The Reigns of Baybars and Qala≠wu≠n To date scholars have established that the early Mamluk sultans legitimized their rule through the conscious use of Islamic themes.1 As yet however, one crucial issue that has not been routinely addressed, but should be, is audience. Much of the scholarship on Mamluk legitimacy assumes that this legitimacy was asserted in relation to an internal audience, by which is meant either the military elite, the non-military populace, or both. But Mamluk legitimacy must also be examined in light of various external audiences. The most significant of these, and the one discussed here, was those Mongol sovereigns with whom the Mamluks were in the closest contact, namely, the rulers of the Golden Horde and the Ilkhanids. Mamluk assertions of legitimacy can be detected in the diplomatic letters and embassies Baybars and Qala≠wu≠n exchanged with each Mongol power. Furthermore, although scholars have already discussed the Islamic foundation on which Mamluk legitimacy rested, as yet no one has asked, "Why this particular Middle East Documentation Center. The University of Chicago 1Only Stefan Heidemann ventures into a discussion of the external Mongol audience; the remaining scholars (mentioned below) focus fairly exclusively on the internal audience. This focus itself is quite clear, but rarely made explicit. See Stefan Heidemann, Das allepiner Kalifat (A.D. 1261): Vom Ende des Kalifates in Baghdad über Aleppo zu den Restaurationen in Kairo, Islamic History and Civilization, 6 (Leiden, 1994); also P. M. Holt, "The Structure of Government in the Mamluk Sultanate" in The Eastern Mediterranean Lands in the Period of the Crusades, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mamluk Period Full Article Language: En
    _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien B2 voor dit chapter en nul 0 in hierna): 0 _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (oude _articletitle_deel, vul hierna in): Mamluk Period _full_article_language: en 244 Chapter 7 Chapter 7 Mamluk Period Following the death of al-Salih Ayyub and the murder of his son al-Mu‘azzam Turanshah in 1250, ‘Izz al-Din Aybak established Mamluk rule in Egypt. The ongoing intra-Muslim struggle for regional power continued, however, until Hulagu’s invasion of western Syria and Palestine in 1260.1 Qutuz, who had been the effective ruler of Mamluk Egypt since Aybak’s murder in 1257, halted the Mongol expansion when he defeated the forces left behind by Hulagu at ‘Ayn Jalut on 3 September 1260. Following this watershed event, Qutuz remained in power just long enough to extend Mamluk authority across most of western Syria before he too was murdered in October 1260. It was left to his successor, Baybars, to reveal the potential of Mamluk artillery.2 The ascendancy of Baybars marks the start of the final period of Frankish rule in the Levant, culminating in their expulsion from Acre in 1291. This period is documented in the continuations of William of Tyre’s chronicle and the An- nales de Terre Sainte, which remain important sources, while the so called Tem- plar of Tyre provides the most valuable eye-witness account of events from a Frankish perspective. Numerous later historians, including Marino Sanudo, used these works as the basis for their own accounts. Under Baybars, Egypt and western Syria were once more united under a strong and stable ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • Regicide and the „Law of the Turks“
    Sonderdrucke aus der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg ULRICH HAARMANN Regicide and the „Law of the Turks“ Originalbeitrag erschienen in: Michel M. Mazzaoui (Hrsg.): Intellectual studies on Islam: essays written in honor of Martin B. Dickson. Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah Press, 1990, S. [127]-135 ULRICH HAAR1VIANN Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat, Freiburg im Breisgau Federal Republic of Germany Regicide and the "Law of the Turks" WE OWE Martin Dickson important insights into the rules and dynamics of Turkish statecraft. In the in- troduction to his 1958 Princeton dissertation on "Shah Tahmasb and the Uzbeks" (which to our greatest regret was never published) as well as in his concise contribution to the 25th International Congress of Orientalists in Moscow' on "Uzbek Dynastic Theory in the Sixteenth Century," he studied the modes of distributing and legitimizing power in a post- Chingizid, specifically Turkish polity: the Uzbek confederacy that was to dominate Transoxania and Turkestan in the sixteenth century barred Safawid expansion to the northeast, and provided the framework for the silver age revival of orthodox Islam in Bukhara and Samarciand. In this connection it may not be inappropriate to turn one's attention to a so-called "law (or custom, in Arabic: asa[t] = Yasa) of the Turks" to be encountered in the very first phase of Mamluk history. This asat al-Turk entails the following norm: He who kills the king will be king himself. This "law" is mentioned within the context of the assassination of Sultan al-Malik al-Muzaffar Qutuz after his triumphal victory over the Mongol army led by Ketbogha Noyon at cAyn Jalut in October 1260.
    [Show full text]
  • 298 a Note on Al-Maqr Z 'S Remarks Regarding The
    298 A NOTE ON AL-MAQR�Z�'S REMARKS REGARDING THE SILVER COINAGE OF BAYBARS In his discussion of the quality of the silver coinage of Baybars I, al-Maqrizi (1364-1422 A.D.), the chief authority of medieval Egyptian coinage, stated that: "Al-Malik al-Zdhir Rukn al-Din Baybars I, who was one of the greatest kings in Islamic history and whose biography should be known to every king, struck the Zdhirl dirhams, making each one hundred dirhams consist of 70 dirhams of pure silver and 30 dirhams of pure copper, and engraved his blason, the lion, on the dirhams. From then on the Kamili and the Zdhiri dirhams continued to circulate in Egypt and Syria until they deteriorated in A.H. 781 due to the introduction of the Hamawi dirhams, which caused much trouble for the population; this took place under Zahir Barquq before he became A. Ehrenkreutz, in his article "Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fiscal Administration of Egypt in the Middle Ages"2), also adduced al-Maqrizi's report regarding the standard of fineness of the early Mamluk dirhams. His conclusions were based, on the one hand, on exchange rate data and, on the other hand, on the information obtained from Sauvaire3). Likewise, modern numismatists and monetary historians including P. Balog4) and J. Bacharachl) have corroborated Ehrenkreutz's viewpoint in their investigations; thereby supporting al-Maqrizi's report. New numismatic evidence also supports al-Maqrizi's assertion. This new evidence is based on the results of the neutron activation analysis of the standard of fineness of a large number of early Mamluk silver coins from the Karak Hoard.
    [Show full text]
  • Mamluk Studies Review Vol. III (1999)
    MAMLU±K STUDIES REVIEW III 1999 MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENTATION CENTER (MEDOC) THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MAMLU±K STUDIES REVIEW Published by the MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENTATION CENTER (MEDOC) THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Mamlu≠k Studies Review is an annual refereed journal devoted to the study of the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and Syria (648-922/1250-1517). The goals of Mamlu≠k Studies Review are to take stock of scholarship devoted to the Mamluk era, nurture communication within the field, and promote further research by encouraging the critical discussion of all aspects of this important medieval Islamic polity. The journal will include both articles and reviews of recent books. Submissions of original work on any aspect of the field are welcome, although the editorial board will periodically issue volumes devoted to specific topics and themes. Mamlu≠k Studies Review also solicits edited texts and translations of shorter Arabic source materials (waqf deeds, letters, fata≠wá and the like), and encourages discussions of Mamluk era artifacts (pottery, coins, etc.) that place these resources in wider contexts. Transliterated Middle Eastern languages should conform to the system utilized by the Library of Congress. All questions regarding style should be resolved through reference to The Chicago Manual of Style, 14th edition. All submissions should be typed double-spaced. Submissions must be made on labeled computer disk together with a printed copy. Note: Readers of Mamlu≠k Studies Review who have access to the World Wide Web are referred to the MEDOC home page http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/LibInfo/SourcesBySubject/MiddleEast/ medoc.html. This site provides a link to the searchable Mamluk bibliography maintained by MEDOC and has information about subscribing to the Mamluk listserv.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Crusades. Episode 100 Baibars. Wait, Did I Just Say Episode
    History of the Crusades. Episode 100 Baibars. Wait, did I just say Episode 100? Woohoo! Wow, that seemed to go quickly. Even though there's clearly cause to celebrate, we have a lot to get through in this episode, so put the cork back in champagne bottles and we'd better press forward. So where am I? Here we go. Hello again. Last week we saw the Egyptian Mamluks defeat the Mongols in the Battle of Ain Jalut. Now it's hard to overstate the historical importance of this battle. The Egyptians were victorious, and their victory meant that the Mongol invasion was driven back, with its western borders now lying in Persia. Egypt then occupied all of Syria, and the Egyptian Mamluks went on to establish a power-base which would see them prevail as the dominant Muslim force in the Middle East until the rise of the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s. What would have happened if the Mongols won the Battle of Ain Jalut? Well, it's difficult to speculate, but Steven Runciman, in the third book of his trilogy on the Crusades, states that had the Mongols won the Battle of Ain Jalut, they no doubt would have pressed their advantage and gone on to conquer Egypt, meaning there would have been no great Muslim power remaining in the Middle East. The closest Muslim country would have been Morocco, far to the west in North Africa. Kitbuqa, the Mongol commander defeated at Ain Jalut, was a Nestorian Christian. Had he prevailed in battle, it's likely that the native Christians in the Middle East may have for the first time, risen to power under the Mongols.
    [Show full text]
  • 088. Hallam, 309-310
    THE LAST CRUSADES I The Catholic crusaders against the Hussites were and too weak to be able to protect their country properly; so equally critical of their opponents, as is clear from the they choose as sultan some slave emir who, by his intelli­ letter written by Cardinal HenryBeaufort, a leading gence, courage and self-control. has got on so well in the English ecclesiastic and politician, to the Hanse towns world, and acquired so much power and so many friends, in 1427. Cardinal Beaufort asks this wealthy during the reign of the previous sultan, that. on the death of mercantile association for support for a proposed the sultan. he himself becomes lord. The same things, power and vested interests, keep him in authority; nevertheless. he crusade against the Hussites, but when, in 1428-9, an cannot rest easy and is always in danger of being over­ army was gathered, it was diverted into the very thrown by some other emir who may usurp some of his English war with France which he here condemns. power. by betraying him or conspiring with other people. Even if a sultan has children, and gives orders during his My dear friends and illustrious colleagues: lifetime that one of the said children should become lord after Among the many disasters which Christendom has suf­ him, and even if the great emirs all agree to this, it rarely hap­ fered in our times, we know of no other which has proved so pens. Instead, the chosen heir is often taken prisoner and great a hindrance to the faith and the Church as their internal thrown into gaol for life or secretly strangled or poisoned by divisions and factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Civilization of Mamalic Dynasty and Its Contributions for the Islamic World
    Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica 635 2020, Vol. XXIX, N°3, 635-642 DOI: 10.24205/03276716.2020.766 Gold Civilization of Mamalic Dynasty and its Contributions for The Islamic World Muhammad Qoriba*, Dadang Hartantob Abstract Islam has a long history of forming a new civilization in the world. Through several dynasties that were born, Islam made a significant contribution to the existence of science and the world of academia in particular. One dynasty that made a significant contribution to world civilization was the Mamalik dynasty. For this reason, this research aims to find out how the Mamalik dynasty civilization and its contribution to the Muslim world. This research was conducted by following a systematic literature review approach. Researchers collected data from books and scientific articles relating to the civilization of the Mamalik dynasty. To achieve the objectives of this study, researchers analyzed data qualitatively with an interactive analysis model. This study's results indicate that the Mamalik dynasty was born from descendants of slave backgrounds taken when the Bani Abbasids came to power. However, when they became sultans, they were able to provide something equivalent to those not from a slave's past. The Mamalik dynasty introduced a new government system, namely the military oligarchy system, which undermined the tradition of lifting the Caliph based on heredity. Besides that, when this dynasty was in power, many scholars and scientists were born, such as Ibn Taimiyah, Jalaluddin al-Suyuthi, Ibn Qudamah, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalany, Ibn Qayyim al- Juziyah, and others. Keywords: Civilization, Mamalik, Islamic world 1. Introduction Many works and figures at this time became an The importance of human resource improvement inspiration in the development of science, Islamic civilization has experienced ups and downs evidenced by the existence of the Bayt al-Hikmah in history from the time of the Prophet Muhammad library as a scientific centre at that time (Fahruddin to the peak of the glory of Islam to its current M.
    [Show full text]