DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 5 Health, Safety & Environmental Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 5 Health, Safety & Environmental Management Volume l, Book 1, Section 5 Health, Safety & Environmental Management Section 5 Health, Safety & Environmental Management 5.1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 SERCO HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY....................................................................5-1 5.3 HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY STANDARD..................................................................................................5-2 5.4 HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.........................................................................................5-2 5.5 RISK ASSESSMENTS .................................................................................................................................................5-5 5.6 HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN...............................................................................................5-5 5.7 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REVIEW ......................................................................................................................5-6 5.8 ORGANISATION..........................................................................................................................................................5-8 5.8.1 CONTRACT MANAGER............................................................................................................................................................... 5-8 5.8.2 RAF COLLEGE CRANWELL CONTRACT SAFETY, RISK AND COMPLIANCE MANAGER ............................... 5-9 5.8.3 HEALTH AND SAFETY REPRESENTATIVES................................................................................................................... 5-11 5.8.4 FIRST AIDERS.............................................................................................................................................................................. 5-11 5.8.5 BUILDING CUSTODIAN.......................................................................................................................................................... 5-12 5.8.6 SAFETY, RISK AND COMPLIANCE ORGANISATION.................................................................................................. 5-12 5.9 CAPABILITY................................................................................................................................................................5-15 5.9.1 SERCO MARINE SERVICES..................................................................................................................................................... 5-16 5.9.2 ASCENSION AND FALKLAND ISLANDS .......................................................................................................................... 5-17 5.9.3 RNAS YEOVILTON, RNAS CULDROSE, RAF BRIZE NORTON, RAF LYNEHAM, AND RAF COSFORD .. 5-17 5.9.4 RAF HALTON................................................................................................................................................................................ 5-19 5.9.5 SCATSTA AIRPORT................................................................................................................................................................... 5-19 5.9.6 RAF SURFACE FINISHING CONTRACT............................................................................................................................ 5-20 5.9.7 DEFENCE ACADEMY................................................................................................................................................................. 5-20 Page 5-i Proposal No. DOD-2012-042 May 2012 COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE ©Serco Volume l, Book 1, Section 5 Health, Safety & Environmental Management 5.10 INTEGRATION WITH THE RAF COLLEGE CRANWELL HSE ORGANISATION ........................... 5-21 5.11 SUPPORT.................................................................................................................................................................... 5-22 5.11.1 AUTHORISING ENGINEERS GROUP................................................................................................................................. 5-22 5.11.2 SERCO TECHNICAL SERVICES (TS)................................................................................................................................... 5-22 5.11.3 SERCO SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY...........................................................................................5-23 5.12 HEALTH AND SAFETY TRAINING .................................................................................................................. 5-23 5.12.1 SERCO IN-HOUSE TRAINING .............................................................................................................................................. 5-24 5.12.2 STAFF INDUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................... 5-27 5.12.3 STAFF TRAINING ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5-28 5.12.4 TRAINING RECORDS AND PROGRAMME....................................................................................................................... 5-28 5.13 AUTHORISATIONS AND COMPETENCE RECORDS................................................................................ 5-29 5.14 ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTING ............................................................................................................... 5-29 5.15 AUDIT AND MONITORING................................................................................................................................. 5-30 5.15.1 HEALTH AND SAFETY AUDITS........................................................................................................................................... 5-30 5.15.2 SCOPE OF AUDITS..................................................................................................................................................................... 5-31 5.15.3 AUDITOR COMPETENCY........................................................................................................................................................ 5-32 5.15.4 TRACKING OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 5-33 5.15.5 ESCALATION PROCEDURE.................................................................................................................................................... 5-33 5.15.6 AUDIT RECORDS AND ACTION TRACKING.................................................................................................................. 5-34 5.16 FACILITY MANAGEMENT.................................................................................................................................... 5-36 5.16.1 CONTROL OF SITE FACILITY BUILDINGS....................................................................................................................... 5-36 5.17 COMPLIANCE WITH JSP 375............................................................................................................................ 5-37 5.18 DANGEROUS ARTICLES AND SUBSTANCES............................................................................................ 5-37 5.18.1 BREATHING AIR......................................................................................................................................................................... 5-38 5.19 HEALTH AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE AND AWARDS....................................................................... 5-38 5.20 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE............................................................................................................... 5-41 Page 5-ii Proposal No. DOD-2012-042 May 2012 COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE ©Serco Volume l, Book 1, Section 5 Health, Safety & Environmental Management 5.21 AVIATION SAFETY..................................................................................................................................................5-42 5.21.1 SERCO GROUP – GROUP RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (GRMC)............................................................. 5-43 5.21.2 SERCO AVIATION SAFETY GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE (ASGC)........................................................................ 5-44 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................................... 6-46 6.1.2 CARBON MANAGEMENT........................................................................................................................................................ 6-50 6.1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES......................................................................................................... 6-53 6.1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL KPI REPORTING – ASSURE........................................................................................................... 6-54 6.1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENT AND NEAR-MISS REPORTING – ASSURE....................................................... 6-55 6.1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ...................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7: Aviation and Telecommunications
    Viking Wind Farm Chapter 7 Section 36 Variation Application – EIA Report Aviation and Telecommunications 7. AVIATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS Executive Summary The ES and ES Addendum determined that the consented Viking Wind Farm would have no significant effects on existing telecommunications and microwave links following the application of mitigation measures. The same mitigation measures would be implemented for the proposed varied development, which will ensure no significant effects on existing telecommunications and microwave links. On this basis there is no difference in the effects associated with the consented Viking Wind Farm and the proposed varied development. The Applicant engaged in detailed consultation with Scatsta Airport owners, licensee and operators as part of the development of the consented Viking Wind Farm layout regarding mitigation for the potential significant effects on aviation operations at the airfield. Following consultation and through the determination of the relevant section 36 consent, turbines are no longer proposed for the Delting quadrant. As a result, the consented Viking Wind Farm, subject to the compliance with relevant conditions of the consent, would have no significant effect on operations at Scatsta Airport. The proposed varied development would introduce an additional requirement for aviation lighting. Current regulations1 requires ‘en-route obstacles’ taller than 150 m to be provided with aviation lighting scheme. The Applicant would seek to agree suitable lighting scheme with the planning authority in consultation with the Scatsta Airport Operator and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) as part of agreeing an Aviation Mitigation Scheme2. On the basis that the proposed varied development would also comply with the pre-commencement condition3, there would be no significant effects on aviation operations, and there would be no difference between the consented Viking Wind Farm and the proposed varied development.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Report a Publication of Saab Aircraft Leasing
    Issue 27 December 2011 MARKET REPORT A PUBLICATION OF SAAB AIRCRAFT LEASING DARWIN DEVELOPS EUROPEAN NETWORK PlottING A NEW COURSE GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL ADDS SAAB 340Bplus AIRCRAFT AND BECOMES SILVER AIRWAYS messaGE FROM CONTENTS Michael Magnusson Golden Air shines as niche Swedish carrier ......................... 3-5 Reflecting on 2011 activity and Darwin develops European network .................................... 6-9 readying for next year’s priorities Flying to the finish line. .................................................... 10-12 Pinnacle positions .................................................................13 As 2011 draws to a close, we can look back over a busy year during which Lakeshore luxury ..................................................................13 we transacted business on many Saab Plotting a new course 340Bplus aircraft. As we have taken Gulfstream International adds Saab 340Bplus aircraft aircraft back from Mesaba, we have found and becomes Silver Airways ........................................... 14-16 new homes for them with both old and new customers. The 30-seat turboprop Saab 340 operators in Thailand expand regional airline service ...........................................................17 continues to be a perfect regional aircraft choice on many regional routes. Saab Destination: Scatsta Airport, Shetland – Scotland. ......18 We are especially pleased that a revitalized Gulfstream International Airlines in Saab 340 Global Operators Conference set for 2012 ...........19 Florida, soon
    [Show full text]
  • Multi Cat 2712 Makes Three for Briggs Marine Clyde
    SEAWORK 2016 SPECIAL | SOUTHAMPTON, UK | 14 – 16 JUNE 2016 | BOOTH #PG100 DAMEN SHIPYARDS GROUP | PHONE +31 (0)183 63 99 11 | [email protected] | WWW.DAMEN.COM TIMES The team from Damen welcomes you to the bigger and better Seawork and to what we are sure will be another great show. Damen has been exhibiting at the event since it began in 1998 and with exhibitors and visitors coming from MULTI CAT 2712 MAKES THREE FOR BRIGGS MARINE across north west Europe we appreciate its importance in the annual events calendar. This year we have brought a variety of vessels Briggs Marine and Environmental Services is due to receive shortly delivery the Kingdom of Fife has been working on Briggs’ £100 million including the 27-metre Multi Cat 2712. After the show what will be its third vessel from Damen in recent years. The first contract to provide maintenance and mooring support for the UK’s it will be heading to its area of operations on the east two were the Forth Jouster, a Multi Cat 2611, and a 62m Anchor Royal Navy. coast of Scotland, but while it is here visitors can see Handling Tug Supplier 75 Kingdom of Fife. This latest addition will be for themselves its spacious deck area, comfortable a second Damen Multi Cat, this time the larger 2712. Designated the For Damen, this latest purchase by Briggs Marine represents an accommodation and the many features that make it one Forth Warrior, it is currently finishing fitting out at Damen Shipyards unequivocal vote of confidence in the Multi Cat class as a range of of the most versatile workboats on the market today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dominican Republic and the United Kingdom: a Relationship Beyond Tourism
    Dominican Republic and the United States: a relationship beyond tourism The Dominican Republic and the United Kingdom: a relationship beyond tourism Ministry of Tourism FITUR 2021 Dominican Republic 1 The Dominican Republic and the United Kingdom: A relationship beyond tourism The Dominican Republic is proud to present a brief summary that illustrates the long and strong relationship with the United Kingdom, seen from the tourism perspective, but encompassing the investment and partnership opportunities that have yet to be exploited. The figures that will be presented below reflect the main tourism statistics such as tourist arrivals from the United Kingdom, their average stay, main ports of departure from the United Kingdom, main reason for travel, characteristics of British tourists, and air traffic among our countries, as well as figures on trade and investment. We hope to continue strengthening our relationship in the future, a relationship beyond tourism. Ministry of Tourism FITUR 2021 2 Dominican Republic Tourist Arrivals From GBR to DOM Ministry of Tourism Dominican Republic FITUR 2021 Tourist GBR as % of total arrivals arrivals from 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% GBR to DOM 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 189.396 Passengers 179.330 172.307 166.384 160.924 140.575 143.625 127.817 109.639 99.727 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Ministry of Tourism FITUR 2021 4 Dominican Republic Tourist arrivals by airport from GBR to DOM British tourists as % of total arrivals 95% 87% 78% 79% 74% 76% 67% 60% 55%
    [Show full text]
  • Portsmouth Dockyard in the Twentieth Century1
    PART THREE PORTSMOUTH DOCKYARD IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY1 3.1 INTRODUCTION The twentieth century topography of Portsmouth Dockyard can be related first to the geology and geography of Portsea Island and secondly to the technological development of warships and their need for appropriately sized and furnished docks and basins. In 2013, Portsmouth Naval Base covered 300 acres of land, with 62 acres of basin, 17 dry docks and locks, 900 buildings and 3 miles of waterfront (Bannister, 10 June 2013a). The Portsmouth Naval Base Property Trust (Heritage Area) footprint is 11.25 acres (4.56 hectares) which equates to 4.23% of the land area of the Naval Base or 3.5% of the total Naval Base footprint including the Basins (Duncan, 2013). From 8 or 9 acres in 1520–40 (Oppenheim, 1988, pp. 88-9), the dockyard was increased to 10 acres in 1658, to 95 acres in 1790, and gained 20 acres in 1843 for the steam basin and 180 acres by 1865 for the 1867 extension (Colson, 1881, p. 118). Surveyor Sir Baldwin Wake Walker warned the Admiralty in 1855 and again in 1858 that the harbour mouth needed dredging, as those [ships] of the largest Class could not in the present state of its Channel go out of Harbour, even in the event of a Blockade, in a condition to meet the Enemy, inasmuch as the insufficiency of Water renders it impossible for them to go out of Harbour with all their Guns, Coals, Ammunition and Stores on board. He noted further in 1858 that the harbour itself “is so blocked up by mud that there is barely sufficient space to moor the comparatively small Force at present there,” urging annual dredging to allow the larger current ships to moor there.
    [Show full text]
  • SHETLAND ISLANDS COUNCIL Hazardous Substances, Pipelines
    SHETLAND ISLANDS COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE Public Safety and Safeguarding Consultation Zones within Shetland Hazardous Substances, Pipelines, Explosives, Quarries & Airports Updated April 2014 Supplementary Planning Guidance Safeguarding Produced by: Shetland Islands Council Development Plans Planning Service 8 North Ness Business Park tel: 01595 744293 www.shetland.gov.uk You may contact the Development Plans Team at email: [email protected] 2 Development Plans October 2008 Supplementary Planning Guidance Safeguarding CONTENTS 1. Introduction Background 5 Legislation and Controls 5 Sites Within Shetland 5 Purpose of this Supplementary Planning Guidance 6 2. Development Plan Policies Existing Policy 7 Draft Recommended Policies 9 3. Control of Hazardous Sites Hazardous Substances Legislation and Advice 11 Hazardous Substances Consent 12 4. Hazard Consultation Zones in Shetland Hazardous Substances Sullom Voe Oil Terminal 13 North Ness Fuel Storage 14 Peterson SBS Base, Greenhead, Lerwick 14 Lerwick Power Station 14 Gas Storage, Industrial Estate, Lerwick 14 Pipelines Brent and Ninian 15 Explosives and Airfields Sumburgh Airport 16 Scasta Airport 17 Airstrips 17 Additional Safeguarding Requirements 17 Bird Strike Hazard 17 Other Aviation Uses 17 Wind Turbine Development 18 Quarries 18 Ministry of Defence 19 Geological Surveys 19 Addresses and Contacts 19 Appendix 1 Major Hazard Sites in Shetland and Consultation Distances 20 Appendix 2 HSE Design Matrix – Inner, Middle and Outer Zones 22 3 Development Plans
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Providers of the Hold Baggage NXCT
    Approved providers of the hold baggage NXCT Airport Management Services Terminal Building, Inverness Airport, Inverness, IV2 7JB 01667 461 533 or 01667 461 535 Gary Stoddart [email protected] ASTACC 77 New Abbey Road,Dumfries,DG2 7LA 01387 265232 Jeff Golightly [email protected] AviationSec 6 Mill Cottages, Grindley Brook, Whitchurch, SY13 4QH 07802 221365 Andrew Hudson [email protected] Avsec Global Ltd Business Incubation Centre,University of Chichester, Bognor Regis Campus, Upper Bognor Road, Bognor Regis,West Sussex, United Kingdom, PO21 1HR Chris Barratt [email protected] Sara Gladstone [email protected] Babcock International Group Mission Critical Services Offshore Aviation, Babcock International Group, Farburn Terrace, Aberdeen Airport East, Dyce, Aberdeen , Aberdeenshire , AB21 7DT Brenda Tait [email protected] Belfast City Airport Belfast, BT3 9JH, Northern Ireland 028 9093 9093 Ray Jeffries [email protected] Bournemouth Airport Christchurch, Dorset, BH 23 6SE 01446712621 Tony Brogden [email protected] Browns UK Training Services 72 Evelyn Crescent, Sunbury Middlesex,TW16 6LZ 07841 590787 Rodger Brown [email protected] Cardiff Airport Vale of Glamorgan, Wales, CF62 3BD +44 (0) 7342 949255 Clive Parsons [email protected] CargoTRACKER More House, 514 Finchley Road, London NW11 8DD 020 8458 7720 Ron Haviv [email protected] City of Derry Airport CODA(Operations) Ltd, Airport Road, Eglinton, County Derry, BT47 3GY 028 71 81 07 84 Tracy Duffy
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Baseline Report Shetland Inter-Island Transport Study
    Shetland Inter-Island Transport Study Tasks 1a & 1b – Aviation Baseline On behalf of Shetland Islands Council Project Ref: 35580 | Rev: BO’F | Date: November 2015 Office Address: 3rd Floor, Exchange Place 3, 3 Semple Street, Edinburgh EH3 8BL T: +44 (0)131 297 7010 E: [email protected] Aviation Baseline Report Shetland Inter-Island Transport Study Document Control Sheet Project Name: Shetland Inter-Island Transport Study Project Ref: 35580 Report Title: Aviation Baseline Report Date: 25th October 2015 Name Position Signature Date Director, Northpoint Prepared by: Basil O’Fee 25/10/15 Aviation Stephen Associate – Reviewed by: 26/10/15 Canning Transport Planner Approved by: Dr Scott Leitham Senior Associate 27/10/15 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Second version from Northpoint v2.0 20/11/2016 Bo’F SC SL responding to SIC comments Third version from Northpoint v3.0 26/11/2015 Bo’F SC SL responding to SIC comments Fourth version from Northpoint v4.0 30/11/2015 Bo’F SC SL responding to SIC comments Fifth version from Northpoint v5.0 05/01/2016 responding to Direct Flight Bo’F SC SL comments Sixth version from Northpoint v6.0 03/02/2016 Bo’F SC SL responding to SIC comments Seventh version from Northpoint v7.0 15/02/2016 Bo’F SC SL responding to SIC comments Eighth version from Northpoint v8.0 18/02/2016 Bo’F SC SL responding to SIC comments Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications & Aviation
    VIKING WIND FARM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 1 8 . TELECOMMUNICATIONS & AVIATION 18.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents an assessment of the potential effects of the proposed wind farm development on telecommunication and aviation interests. Fixed radio links, scanning telemetry systems and radar are used by communication companies, the emergency services, utility companies, the National Air Traffic Service and the Ministry of Defence. The presence of a wind turbine can affect the signals from such systems by reflecting, refracting or masking the signals. Masking is when an obstacle, such as a wind turbine, prevents a transmitted signal reaching a receiver, resulting in the signal being blocked. Static objects such as large buildings or structures can reflect signals, causing multiple routes to the receiver; it is also possible that large structures refract the signal away from its intended path which can also result in a loss of reception. Moving objects such as wind turbine blades also do this, but the effect is not constant. In this situation dynamic affects such as Doppler shift of the signals cause additional issues. Wind turbines, as with any large structure, can potentially interfere with electromagnetic signals, particularly telecommunications and television. This study has been carried out by Airtricity on behalf of Viking Energy Partnership, to investigate and evaluate the extent to which the proposed Viking Wind Farm may cause electromagnetic interference to existing telecommunications facilities. In particular, the study considers the potential impacts of the proposed windfarm on: • Television broadcast; • radio communications; • air traffic control; • military radar; • civilian airspace; and • military airspace. 18.2 SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT The assessment has taken account of scoping responses from relevant bodies as well as existing policy relevant to telecommunications and aviation issues/infrastructure likely to be affected by the windfarm development.
    [Show full text]
  • STCW Personal Survival Techniques – MCA Approved Training Providers
    STCW Personal Survival Techniques – MCA Approved Training Providers Training Providers: If you are an approved MCA course provider and not on this list or if your details need updating please email: [email protected]. If you hold pilot approval you will need to wait until full approval is granted by an MCA surveyor before being listed below. Seafarers: If you have undertaken or are about to undertake MCA approved training and it is not listed below, please email [email protected] to ensure it is MCA approved. UK Approved Training Providers Training Provider Location Address Contact Details Website Advanced Industrial North Shields, Unit 3 & 4, Jupiter Court, Orion Tel: 08448 001810 www.aisgroup.co.uk Solutions (AIS) Tyne & Wear Business Park, Tyne Tunnel Industrial Email: [email protected] Estate, North Shields, NE29 7SE Anglo-Scottish Seafish & Northumberland Amble Marina, Northumberland, NE66 Tel: 01665 713823 Seafood Training OYP Email: [email protected] Association Blackpool and The Fylde Fleetwood, Fleetwood Nautical Campus, Tel: 01253 779123 www.blackpool.ac.uk/nau College Lancashire Broadwater, Fleetwood, Lancashire, Email: [email protected] tical FY7 8JZ Bristol Maritime Academy Bristol Underfall Yard, Cumberland Road, Tel: 01179 291153 www.bristolmaritimeacad Bristol, BS1 6XG Email: emy.co.uk [email protected] City of Glasgow College Glasgow, 21 Thistle Street, Glasgow, G5 9XB Tel: 04143 755572 http://www.cityofglasgow Scotland Email: college.ac.uk [email protected]. uk City Training
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Accident to AS332 L2 Super Puma Helicopter, G-WNSB on Approach to Sumburgh Airport on 23 August 2013
    AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 1/2016 AAir AccidentsA InvestigationIB Branch Report on the accident to AS332 L2 Super Puma helicopter, G-WNSB on approach to Sumburgh Airport on 23 August 2013 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 1/2016 Air Accidents Investigation Branch Report on the accident to AS332 L2 Super Puma helicopter, G-WNSB on approach to Sumburgh Airport on 23 August 2013 This investigation has been conducted in accordance with Annex 13 to the ICAO Convention on International Civil Aviation, EU Regulation No 996/2010 and The Civil Aviation (Investigation of Air Accidents and Incidents) Regulations 1996. The sole objective of the investigation of an accident or incident under these Regulations is the prevention of future accidents and incidents. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to apportion blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that AAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. © Crown Copyright 2016 This report contains facts which have been determined up to the time of publication. This information is published to inform the aviation industry and the public of the general circumstances of accidents and serious incidents. Extracts may be published without specific permission providing that the source is duly acknowledged, the material is reproduced accurately and it is not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Published 15 March 2016 Printed in the United Kingdom for the Air Accidents Investigation Branch ii Department for Transport Air Accidents Investigation Branch Farnborough House Berkshire Copse Road Aldershot Hampshire GU11 2HH February 2016 The Right Honourable Patrick McLoughlin Secretary of State for Transport Dear Secretary of State I have the honour to submit the report on the circumstances of the accident to AS332 L2 Super Puma helicopter, registration G-WNSB, on approach to Sumburgh Airport on 23 August 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Carbon Access Strategies for Inverness and Kirkwall Airports
    Low Carbon Surface Access Strategies Inverness and Kirkwall Airports PREPARED FOR: HITRANS HIAL Urban Foresight® is a multidisciplinary innovation practice that is dedicated to advancing the next generation of technologies, services and policy frameworks for cities. We work with ambitious organisations around the world on projects that improve lives, protect the environment and boost local economies. Highlands and Islands Transport Partnership (HITRANS) is the statutory regional transport partnership covering Eilean Siar (Western Isles), Orkney, Highland, Moray and most of the Argyll and Bute area. HITRANS work with Councils, the Scottish overnment, Transport Scotland, HIE, transport operators and other stakeholders to improve transport services and infrastructure in the north of Scotland and on routes to the Highlands and Islands. Highlands and Islands Airports Limited (HIAL) is the company that owns and operates 11 airports in the Scottish Highlands, the Northern Isles and the Western Isles. These airports include Inverness and Kirkwall. The Northern Periphery and Arctic (NPA) Programme , co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), forms a cooperation between 9 programme partner countries: the Member States of Finland, Ireland, Sweden and the UK (Scotland and Northern Ireland) in cooperation with the Faroe Islands, Iceland, Greenland and Norway. Version: 2.0 Project ref: 1815 Executive Summary This study has been prepared for Highlands and Islands Transport Partnership (HITRANS) and Highlands and Islands Airports Limited (HIAL), in support of the Smart Peripheral and Remote Airports (SPARA) project. This study has considered best practice in decarbonising surface access to and from remote and peripheral airports to inform the development of low carbon access strategies and subsequent delivery of priority programmes at Inverness airport and Kirkwall airport.
    [Show full text]