The Basilica of San Domenico Maggiore in Naples

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Basilica of San Domenico Maggiore in Naples THE BASILICA OF SAN DOMENICO MAGGIORE IN NAPLES: THE ART, TRADITION, AND POWER OF A SACRED SPACE by Elizabeth Nogan Ranieri APPROVED BY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ___________________________________________ Dr. Mark Rosen, Chair ___________________________________________ Dr. Richard Brettell ___________________________________________ Dr. J. Michael Farmer ___________________________________________ Dr. Peter Park ___________________________________________ Dr. Scott Hendrix Copyright 2017 Elizabeth Nogan Ranieri All Rights Reserved To Mom and Dad THE BASILICA OF SAN DOMENICO MAGGIORE IN NAPLES: THE ART, TRADITION, AND POWER OF A SACRED SPACE by ELIZABETH NOGAN RANIERI, BA, MA DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The University of Texas at Dallas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AESTHETIC STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my Mother and Father for always believing in me. My husband, who has encouraged me and put up with me. My beautiful daughter, for the time she sacrificed with me as I was working. Mark Rosen, for being an excellent mentor. Rick Brettell, for helping me fund all my travel. Mike Farmer, for believing in me. Scott Hendrix, for being a great person and an amazing cheerleader. The city of Naples, for welcoming me and for being so easy to love. My friends and colleagues at UTD, especially Poe Johnson and Marina Jenkins. Sarah Kozlowski, for being a mentor and a friend. The many kind people who I met during my travels in Naples. My childcare providers. My extended family. Cat, Christi, and Lindsay. The University of Dallas. My mom (and dad) friends. May 2017 v THE BASILICA OF SAN DOMENICO MAGGIORE IN NAPLES: THE ART, TRADITION, AND POWER OF A SACRED SPACE Elizabeth Nogan Ranieri, PhD The University of Texas at Dallas, 2017 ABSTRACT Supervising Professor: Dr. Mark Rosen This dissertation examines the art, literature, and history of the Basilica of San Domenico Maggiore in Naples, Italy, and the way in which this sacred space has been imbued with meaning by the Order of Preachers. The dissertation establishes a framework of sacred space theory and historical context of medieval and early modern Naples. It argues that places are sacrilized through a combination of person, place, and text—all three of which are evident at San Domenico Maggiore. It examines the pertinent first-person writings about the sacred space from the archives and guidebooks by both lay and Dominican authors. The dissertation discusses the early history of the Dominicans and their medieval iconography, paying particularly close attention to Thomas Aquinas and his tenure in Naples, but also to the ways that the Dominicans and their donors used imagery derived from the history and legends surrounding Aquinas’ life— especially the years spent at San Domenico Maggiore—to decorate the space and to attract pilgrims. It explores the systems of early modern patronage of the sacred space by examining specific chapels and artworks. It examines the diffusion of the imagery of the Virgin of the Rosary in early modern Naples and the ways in which the Council of Trent influenced art- vi making in sacred spaces. It also provides a visual analysis of the Chapterhouse and Sacristy situated within the convent complex and demonstrate how the two spaces use Dominican and site-specific visual rhetoric to represent Dominican agency in these rooms. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................................................................................v ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS..................................................................................................ix INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1. WRITING SAN DOMENICO MAGGIORE..................................................19 CHAPTER 2. THE FOUNDERS AND THE LEGACY OF THOMAS AQUINAS.............42 CHAPTER 3. FRANCE, ARAGON, AND THE SEGGIO....................................................72 CHAPTER 4. THE COUNTER-REFORMATION AND THE ROSARY............................95 CHAPTER 5. THE CHAPTERHOUSE AND SACRISTY..................................................127 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................151 APPENDIX............................................................................................................................154 ILLUSTRATIONS.................................................................................................................156 BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................................................210 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.................................................................................................218 CURRICULUM VITAE viii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Modern Plan of San Domenico Maggiore. (Modified from the original version found in: Salerno, Luigi. La Basilica di S. Domenico Maggiore in Napoli. Napoli: Tip. Laurenziana, 1977. p. 99.).................................................................................................................................156 Figure 2. List of chapels corresponding with Plan (Figure 1).....................................................157 Figure 3. Modern Plan of Convent Complex with labeled sites of interest. (Modified from the original version found in: Foglia, Orsola. “Il Complesso di San Domenico Maggiore.” Paparo Edizioni, 2002. PolisMusea: Catalogo Mostra.).........................................................................158 Figure 4. Roberto D’Oderisio, La Madonna dell’Umità (Mater Omnium). c. 1350. Naples, Museo di Capodimonte. (Photo courtesy of the Museo di Capodimonte.)..................................159 Figure 5. Artist Unknown, Miraculous Crucifix associated with Thomas Aquinas, seen in his cell. Early Duecento. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)............................................................................159 Figure 6. The Chapel of the Crucifix (Cappellone del Crocefisso) seen with copy of Miraculous Crucifix associated with Thomas Aquinas at the altar. (Photograph from: De Divitiis, Bianca. Architettura e comittenza nella Napoli del Quattrocento. Venice: Marsilio, 2007. p. 143.)......160 Figure 7. School of Tino da Camaino, Tombs of Tommaso and Cristofaro d’Aquino. Late Trecento. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.).................................................................................................161 Figure 8. School of Tino da Camaino, Tomb of Giovanna d’Aquino. c. 1350. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)......................................................................................................................................162 Figure 9. Pietro Cavallini, Crucifixion with Dominicans. 1308. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)...163 Figure 10. Cappella degli Affreschi (also Figure 1: 3). (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.).....................164 Figure 11. Unknown Artist, Saint Dominic. c.1290. Tempera on Wood. 63 by 190 cm. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)..............................................................................................................165 Figure 12. Cell of Thomas Aquinas. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)......................................................166 ix Figure 13. Corridor of cloister with cell of Thomas Aquinas to the right. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)......................................................................................................................................167 Figure 14. Composite of images from the interior of the cell of Thomas Aquinas. Miraculous Crucifix, Portrait by Solimena, Reliquary with humerus, Silver bust, prayer books. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)................................................................................................................................168 Figure 15. Giovanni da Taranto, Saint Dominic. 1305. (Photo courtesy of the Museo di Capodimonte.)..............................................................................................................................169 Figure 16. Att. Agnolo Agnello Fiore, Altar of San Girolamo de’ Ricci. Late 15th C. (Photograph taken by author. Used with permission from the Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo.)................................................................................................................................170 Figure 17. (left to right) Altar of San
Recommended publications
  • Shroud Spectrum International No. 9 Part 6
    25 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Q. What is the relation of stigmatics to the Shroud? The Shroud shows the nail wound in the back of the wrist whilst all stigmatics have wounds in their palms. Carmel Camilleri, Malta Pollard Cross: The Coesfeld Crucifix A. One thing at least is certain: The stigmata are not reproductions of historical reality. The wide variety of manifestations is proof enough, one instance being that some stigmatics have the "lance wound" on the right, some on the left. It would seem that the location of the stigmata might be determined by two factors: 1), the personality and mental images of the mystic. One good example: Praying before a Pollard cross, common in Germanic countries from early medieval times, Catherine Emmerich (d. 1924), evidently "taking up her cross", was marked on the shoulder with a Y. And 2), the general conceptions about crucifixions in the minds of the mystics' contemporaries. These general conceptions were certainly formed in contemplation of crucifixes, which have consistently shown nails in the palms of the corpus, according to Jesus' words, "See my hands ... " in a post-resurrection appearance. (Lk 24:39, Jo 20:20,24-28) But crucifixes are made by artists, none of whom ever witnessed a crucifixion. The great artists of the Renaissance hung corpses for models and were dismayed when their macabre subjects fell because the nails ripped the palms right through. Yet, faithful to artistic tradition, they continued to place nails in the palms when representing Christ crucified. Rubens and Van Eyck departed from tradition, placing nails in the wrists; but their correction is not followed even today.
    [Show full text]
  • The COMICAL HISTORY of ALPHONSUS, KING of ARAGON
    ElizabethanDrama.org presents the Annotated Popular Edition of The COMICAL HISTORY of ALPHONSUS, KING OF ARAGON By Robert Greene Written c. 1588-1591 Earliest Extant Edition: 1599 Featuring complete and easy-to-read annotations. Annotations and notes © Copyright Peter Lukacs and ElizabethanDrama.org, 2021. This annotated play may be freely copied and distributed. The COMICAL HISTORY of ALPHONSUS, KING OF ARAGON by ROBERT GREENE Written c. 1588-1591 Earliest Extant Edition: 1599 DRAMATIS PERSONAE: European Characters: Carinus, the rightful heir to the crown of Aragon. Alphonsus, his son. Flaminius, King of Aragon. INTRODUCTION to the PLAY. Albinius, a Lord of Aragon Laelius, a Lord of Aragon There is no point in denying that Alphonsus, King of Miles, a Lord of Aragon Aragon, Robert Greene's first effort as a dramatist, is Belinus, King of Naples. clearly inferior to Christopher Marlowe's Tamburlaine, the Fabius, a Lord of Naples. play (or plays, really) that inspired it. Having said that, a Duke of Millain (Milan). modern reader can still enjoy Greene's tale of his own un- conquerable hero, and will appreciate the fact that, unlike Eastern Characters: the works of other lesser playwrights, Alphonsus does move briskly along, with armies swooping breathlessly on Amurack, the Great Turk. and off the stage. Throw in Elizabethan drama's first talking Fausta, wife to Amurack. brass head, and a lot of revenge and murder, and the reader Iphigina, their daughter. will be amply rewarded. Arcastus, King of the Moors. The language of Alphonsus is also comparatively easy Claramont, King of Barbary. to follow, making it an excellent starter-play for those who Crocon, King of Arabia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance
    •••••••• ••• •• • .. • ••••---• • • - • • ••••••• •• ••••••••• • •• ••• ••• •• • •••• .... ••• .. .. • .. •• • • .. ••••••••••••••• .. eo__,_.. _ ••,., .... • • •••••• ..... •••••• .. ••••• •-.• . PETER MlJRRAY . 0 • •-•• • • • •• • • • • • •• 0 ., • • • ...... ... • • , .,.._, • • , - _,._•- •• • •OH • • • u • o H ·o ,o ,.,,,. • . , ........,__ I- .,- --, - Bo&ton Public ~ BoeMft; MA 02111 The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance ... ... .. \ .- "' ~ - .· .., , #!ft . l . ,."- , .• ~ I' .; ... ..__ \ ... : ,. , ' l '~,, , . \ f I • ' L , , I ,, ~ ', • • L • '. • , I - I 11 •. -... \' I • ' j I • , • t l ' ·n I ' ' . • • \• \\i• _I >-. ' • - - . -, - •• ·- .J .. '- - ... ¥4 "- '"' I Pcrc1·'· , . The co11I 1~, bv, Glacou10 t l t.:• lla l'on.1 ,111d 1 ll01nc\ S t 1, XX \)O l)on1c111c. o Ponrnna. • The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance New Revised Edition Peter Murray 202 illustrations Schocken Books · New York • For M.D. H~ Teacher and Prie11d For the seamd edillo11 .I ltrwe f(!U,riucu cerurir, passtJgts-,wwbly thOS<' on St Ptter's awl 011 Pnlladfo~ clmrdses---mul I lr,rvl' takeu rhe t>pportrmil)' to itJcorporate m'1U)1 corrt·ctfons suggeSLed to nu.• byfriet1ds mu! re11iewers. T'he publishers lwvc allowed mr to ddd several nt•w illusrra,fons, and I slumld like 10 rltank .1\ Ir A,firlwd I Vlu,.e/trJOr h,'s /Jelp wft/J rhe~e. 711f 1,pporrrm,ty /t,,s 11/so bee,r ft1ke,; Jo rrv,se rhe Biblfogmpl,y. Fc>r t/Jis third edUfor, many r,l(lre s1m1II cluu~J!eS lwvi: been m"de a,,_d the Biblio,~raphy has (IJICt more hN!tl extet1si11ely revised dtul brought up to date berause there has l,een mt e,wrmc>uJ incretlJl' ;,, i111eres1 in lt.1lim, ,1rrhi1ea1JrP sittr<• 1963,. wlte-,r 11,is book was firs, publi$hed. It sh<>uld be 110/NI that I haw consistc11tl)' used t/1cj<>rm, 1./251JO and 1./25-30 to 111e,w,.firs1, 'at some poiHI betwt.·en 1-125 nnd 1430', .md, .stamd, 'begi,miug ilJ 1425 and rnding in 14.10'.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbol of Conquest, Alliance, and Hegemony
    SYMBOL OF CONQUEST, ALLIANCE, AND HEGEMONY: THE IMAGE OF THE CROSS IN COLONIAL MEXICO by ZACHARY WINGERD Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON August 2008 Copyright © by Zachary Wingerd 2008 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I offer thanks to Dr. Dennis Reinhartz, Dr. Kenneth Philp, Dr. Richard Francaviglia, and Dr. Joseph Bastien who agreed to sit on my dissertation committee and guide my research and writing. Special thanks are given to Dr. Douglas Richmond who encouraged my topic from the very beginning and as the committee chair actively supported my endeavor. May 1, 2008 iii DEDICATED TO MY LOVING WIFE AND SONS Lindsey, Josh, and Jamie iv ABSTRACT SYMBOL OF CONQUEST, ALLIANCE, AND HEGEMONY: THE IMAGE OF THE CROSS IN COLONIAL MEXICO Zachary Wingerd, PhD. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2008 Supervising Professor: Douglas Richmond The universality of the cross image within the transatlantic confrontation meant not only a hegemony of culture, but of symbolism. The symbol of the cross existed in both European and American societies hundreds of years before Columbus. In both cultures, the cross was integral in religious ceremony, priestly decoration, and cosmic maps. As a symbol of life and death, of human and divine suffering, of religious and political acquiescence, no other image in transatlantic history has held such a perennial, powerful message as the cross. For colonial Mexico, which felt the brunt of Spanish initiative, the symbol of the cross penetrated the autochthonous culture out of which the independent nation and indigenous church were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Giuseppe Porzio, Revue Du Louvre
    siècle e XVII La Sainte Agathe en prison du musée de Nevers et les débuts de Bernardo Cavallino par Giuseppe Porzio La toile représentant Sainte Agathe en prison miracu leu sement soignée par saint Pierre conservée au Musée municipal de Nevers1 (fig. 1) n’a pas obtenu à ce jour la considération Provenant de la collection du qu’elle mérite de la part des spécialistes de la peinture napo- e marquis Campana au XIXe siècle, litaine du XVII siècle ; en conséquence – et malgré sa grande qualité – la question de sa paternité n’a pas encore reçu de cette œuvre des collections du solution convaincante et définitive. À l’évidence, la modestie Louvre est conservée depuis des reproductions dont elle a toujours fait l’objet lorsqu’elle 1962 au musée de Nevers. a été publiée a dû, elle aussi, contribuer à sa sous-évaluation Rattachée précédemment à ainsi qu’à sa position marginale dans les études sur le sujet et e en interdire de fait une lecture correcte2. l’école napolitaine du XVII siècle et plus précisément à l’œuvre de Francesco Guarino, elle reviendrait Les différentes attributions à son contemporain Cavallino, qui l’aurait peinte au moment des Le débat sur la paternité de cette Sainte Agathe se réduit, contacts stylistiques les plus étroits en substance, à une hésitation entre le nom de Francesco Guarino (1611-1651) 3 – assurément la référence qui a eu entre les deux artistes. le plus de succès, y compris parce qu’il s’agit de la plus cré- Résumés en anglais p. 107 et en allemand p.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI Working Papers
    DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION EUI Working Papers HEC 2010/02 DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION Moving Elites: Women and Cultural Transfers in the European Court System Proceedings of an International Workshop (Florence, 12-13 December 2008) Giulia Calvi and Isabelle Chabot (eds) EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE , FLORENCE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION Moving Elites: Women and Cultural Transfers in the European Court System Proceedings of an International Workshop (Florence, 12-13 December 2008) Edited by Giulia Calvi and Isabelle Chabot EUI W orking Paper HEC 2010/02 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1725-6720 © 2010 Giulia Calvi and Isabelle Chabot (eds) Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Abstract The overall evaluation of the formation of political decision-making processes in the early modern period is being transformed by enriching our understanding of political language. This broader picture of court politics and diplomatic networks – which also relied on familial and kin ties – provides a way of studying the political role of women in early modern Europe. This role has to be studied taking into account the overlapping of familial and political concerns, where the intersection of women as mediators and coordinators of extended networks is a central feature of European societies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latinist Poet-Viceroy of Peru and His Magnum Opus
    Faventia 21/1 119-137 16/3/99 12:52 Página 119 Faventia 21/1, 1999119-137 The latinist poet-viceroy of Peru and his magnum opus Bengt Löfstedt W. Michael Mathes University of California-Los Angeles Data de recepció: 30/11/1997 Summary Diego de Benavides A descendent of one of the sons of King Alfonso VII of Castile and León, Juan Alonso de Benavides, who took his family name from the Leonese city granted to him by his father, Diego de Benavides de la Cueva y Bazán was born in 1582 in Santisteban del Puerto (Jaén). Son of the count of Santisteban del Puerto, a title granted by King Enrique IV to Díaz Sánchez in Jaén in 1473, he studied in the Colegio Mayor of San Bartolomé in the University of Salamanca, and followed both careers in letters and arms. He was the eighth count of Santisteban del Puerto, commander of Monreal in the Order of Santiago, count of Cocentina, title granted to Ximén Pérez de Corella by King Alfonso V of Aragón in 1448; count of El Risco, title granted to Pedro Dávila y Bracamonte by the Catholic Monarchs in 1475; and marquis of Las Navas, title granted to Pedro Dávila y Zúñiga, count of El Risco in 1533. As a result of his heroic actions in the Italian wars, on 11 August 1637 Benavides was granted the title of marquis of Solera by Philip IV, and he was subsequently appointed governor of Galicia and viceroy of Navarra. A royal coun- selor of war, he was a minister plenipotentiary at the Peace of the Pyrenees in 1659, and arranged the marriage of Louis XIV with the Princess María Teresa of Austria as part of the terms of the teatry1.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Thomas Aquinas, Priest and Doctor of the Church
    Thomas Aquinas 1 Thomas Aquinas "Aquinas" redirects here. For other uses, see Aquinas (disambiguation). For the ship that sank in 2013, see MV St. Thomas Aquinas. Saint Thomas Aquinas, OP An altarpiece in Ascoli Piceno, Italy, by Carlo Crivelli (15th century) Religious, priest and Doctor of the Church Born 28 January 1225 Roccasecca, Kingdom of Sicily Died 7 March 1274 Fossanova, Papal States Honored in Roman Catholic Church Anglican Communion Lutheranism Canonized July 18, 1323, Avignon, Papal States, by Pope John XXII Major shrine Church of the Jacobins, Toulouse, France Feast 28 January (7 March, until 1969) Attributes The Summa theologiae, a model church, the sun on the chest of a Dominican friar Patronage Academics; against storms; against lightning; apologists; Aquino, Italy; Belcastro, Italy; book sellers; Catholic academies, schools, and universities; chastity; Falerna, Italy; learning; pencil makers; philosophers; publishers; scholars; students; [1] University of Sto. Tomas; Sto. Tomas, Batangas; theologians. Thomas Aquinas 2 Thomas Aquinas Detail from Valle Romita Polyptych by Gentile da Fabriano (circa 1400) Occupation Catholic priest, philosopher and theologian Education Abbey of Monte Cassino University of Naples Federico II Genre Scholasticism, Thomism Subject Metaphysics, Logic, Theology, Mind, Epistemology, Ethics, Politics Notable works • Summa Theologica • Summa contra Gentiles Relatives Landulf of Aquino and Theodora Rossi (parents) Thomas Aquinas, OP (/Help:IPA for English#Keyəˈkwaɪnəs/; 1225 – 7 March 1274), also Thomas of Aquin or Aquino, was an Italian Dominican friar and priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism, within which he is also known as the "Doctor Angelicus" and "Doctor Communis".[2] "Aquinas" is from the county of Aquino, an area his family held land in until 1137.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing 'Race': the Catholic Church and the Evolution of Racial Categories and Gender in Colonial Mexico, 1521-1700
    CONSTRUCTING ‘RACE’: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE EVOLUTION OF RACIAL CATEGORIES AND GENDER IN COLONIAL MEXICO, 1521-1700 _______________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _______________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________ By Alexandria E. Castillo August, 2017 i CONSTRUCTING ‘RACE’: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE EVOLUTION OF RACIAL CATEGORIES AND GENDER IN COLONIAL MEXICO, 1521-1700 _______________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _______________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________ By Alexandria E. Castillo August, 2017 ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the role of the Catholic Church in defining racial categories and construction of the social order during and after the Spanish conquest of Mexico, then New Spain. The Catholic Church, at both the institutional and local levels, was vital to Spanish colonization and exercised power equal to the colonial state within the Americas. Therefore, its interests, specifically in connection to internal and external “threats,” effected New Spain society considerably. The growth of Protestantism, the Crown’s attempts to suppress Church influence in the colonies, and the power struggle between the secular and regular orders put the Spanish Catholic Church on the defensive. Its traditional roles and influence in Spanish society not only needed protecting, but reinforcing. As per tradition, the Church acted as cultural center once established in New Spain. However, the complex demographic challenged traditional parameters of social inclusion and exclusion which caused clergymen to revisit and refine conceptions of race and gender.
    [Show full text]
  • 11.25.2018 Bulletinweb
    ST. STEPHEN CATHOLIC CHURCH Sunday, November 25, 2018 ❖ Feast of Christ the King “For this I was born and for this I came into the world, to testify for the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.” PARISH MINISTRIES ❖ A Catholic Community ❖ ❖ VISITATION OF THE SICK ❖ Homebound & Bereavement Diocese of Honolulu Priest and Homebound Ministers are Virginia Jordan & Helen Luke 2747 Pali Highway ~ Honolulu HI 96817 available to visit the infirm or hospitalized. 808.595.3105 ❖ Hospitality Email Address: [email protected] David Tom Please contact the Church Office. Website address: ssccpali.net ❖ Liturgical Music For sacramental emergency, Dr. Stanley Wong ~ Sat. 4:00 PM call 595.3105 and press #2. MISSION STATEMENT Sunday, 7:15 AM (TBA) “Inspired by the Holy Spirit, we the family Sunday, 9:30 AM (TBA) ❖ BAPTISM of St. Stephen Catholic Church nurture ❖ Lectors and sustain our faith through Love, Beverly Perry Sacramental preparation is required. If you Service and Unity.” ❖ Holy Communion At Mass are expecting or have a child to be baptized, please call the Church Office for PASTOR Jennifer Tamayo ❖ Rev. Fr. Mario Raquepo Sacristy more information at 808.595.3105, [Cell] 808.228.3053 Celine Asato & David Tom Monday thru Friday 9:00 AM to 12 Noon. ❖ Respect Life STAFF Juanita Ruis ❖ MARRIAGE Rev. Deacon Ronald Choo ❖ Holo Holo Ministry Sr. Marykutty Kottuppallil, MSMHC Stan Contrades The Diocese of Honolulu requires couples to Celine Asato marry in the Church and participate in the FAITH FORMATION Tina Welch, Secretary preparation for the Sacrament of eMAIL: [email protected] ❖ Confraternity of Christian Doctrine WEBSITE: ssccpali.net Children Matrimony.
    [Show full text]
  • Venetian Painting in America; the Fifteenth Century
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE • _ „ SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND ; THE GIFT OF HenviS M. Sage 1891 B.3.wyife3 "IaH-o-. DATE DUE hjm^^^ MArfrmfi-Ki^ - t¥iC 9n?i)8g. ,fr 'i- GAYLORD INU.S.A. '"7 , Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924008640496 VENETIAN PAINTING IN AMERICA GiovAHKi Bellini: Madomna Collection or the late Mr. Theodore M. Davis VENETIAN PAINTING IN AMERICA THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY BY BERNARD BERENSON NEW YORK FREDERIC FAIRCHILD SHERMAN MCMXVI 5 Copyright, 1916, by Frederic Fairchild Sherman PREFACE "Now that we are on the subject of Venetian Paint- ing," that would be a more exact title for this book. For, in fact, I have made the stray pictures in our col- lections the pretext for saying what I wanted to say about their authors in general. In some ways this form suits me as it suited my master, Giovanni Morelli. Like him, I have a dis- taste for including in my own writing questions that do not vividly interest me at the moment, no matter how important in themselves ; and like him, I prefer to avoid such systematic treatment as entails dealing with ma- terials either at second hand, or out of dimmed and at- tenuated recollection. It goes against the grain to write about anything that does not fascinate and absorb me. For the last few years it has been the painters of Venice, and Giovanni Bellini in particular, that have preoccupied my leisure and occupied my working hours.
    [Show full text]
  • SANTA BARBARA.Pdf
    02 03 Santa Barbara Francesco Guarino e bottega, 1640 ca Olio su tela, 62x50,5 Napoli, Convento di Santa Teresa degli Scalzi Il dipinto, considerato una Sant’Agnese ed attribuito a Francesco Guarino nell’archivio fotografico della Soprintendenza per i B.A.S. di Napoli, raffigura in realtà Santa Barbara, come si osserva dalla torre collocata a destra sullo sfondo, ed è il pendant della Santa Apollonia, altro olio su tela dello stesso Guarino. Si tratta di una replica di bottega della Santa Barbara. Nella sua monografia “FRANCESCO GUARINO DA SOLOFRA nella Pittura napoletana del Seicento (1611 - 1651)”, Riccardo Lattuada scrive: «Sono giunto a conoscenza del dipinto nel febbraio 1999, quando era ancora attribuito ad un anonimo pittore napoletano della cerchia di Massimo Stanzione. Tale attribuzione è comprensibile alla luce della stretta affinità stilistica e compositiva dell’opera con i modi della maturità di Stanzione. Nel presente dipinto si colgono infatti assonanze nella posizione del volto e della mano al petto rispetto alla Sant’Agnese di Stanzione a Barcellona, Museo d’Arte Catalunya, datata dalla critica agli inizi degli anni Quaranta. Il riferimento primario dell’opera è, in ogni caso, istituibile rispetto alla Santa Barbara nel Convento di Santa Teresa agli Studi, qui attribuito a Guarino e bottega, che forma pendant con la Santa Apollonia. Ma il quadro di Santa Teresa appare una replica prevalentemente eseguita da aiuti di Guarino, mentre il presente dipinto costituisce sicuramente l’originale della composizione. Se il gusto per le preziose stoffe seriche bianche e oro, rese con una materia spessa e per una volta intatta, avvicina il presente dipinto alle migliori espressioni dell’arte di Stanzione e di Cavallino, è poi di Guarino la capacità di sensibilizzare questa straordinaria immagine femminile mediante una ardente espressione devota, che può essere fatta risalire all’interesse dell’ambiente napoletano verso i modelli di Reni.
    [Show full text]