<<

Course Outline | Spring Semester 2016

PHIL 633 | of

Optional Course for the concentration track Course Teacher: Dr. Mohamed Mesbahi Credit : 3 Pre-requisites: PHIL 631 Co-requisites: None Course Duration: 14 weeks; Semester 2 Total Student Study : 126 hours, including 42 contact hours (lectures and seminars).

AIMS

Throughout the course, students will learn to:

1. Think about the major changes to the of “self” over time, from Greek and medieval (Arabic and Latin) philosophy when the was synonymous with , up until its conceptions in which took the form of the “I think” concept, (the Cartesian cogito), and up until where the self is seen as an illusion or a fluid historical process of becoming.

2. Question whether the shift from the idea of the self as a reflection of the -world (Ibn Rushd) to the self as creator of the object (Kant and German , idealism), and then to the self that many philosophers and intellectuals have declared dead (Bourdieu, Foucault), was a result of philosophical ruptures or due to continual development of philosophical on the role of the human in .

3. Reflect on the position that sees subjectivity as the plague of modern philosophy, and which insists we must return to the old, ‘original’ position that gives precedence to existence over the self (Heidegger), or that gives precedence to the inter-subjective over subjectivity (Habermas).

INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES

This course will prepare students to carry out academic research with confidence and competence. It will equip them with knowledge of key philosophical and the ability to raise key questions and issues in philosophy and the history of . This forwards the key objectives of the philosophy program and the philosophy and history of ideas track through three specific skill sets in which students will gain:

1) -specific skills:

• Awareness of the changes to the concept of the self in the history of philosophy, starting with the examination of philosophical texts and reflection on their self-development in relationship with the development of philosophical knowledge • Knowledge of the means by which a change in the of philosophical terms becomes a change to the problems by means of inference, and how semantic change to one concept leads to change in the structure of similar or opposite concepts

• Ability to perceive the course of the history of philosophy on the basis of a single concept such as the concept of the self • Ability to distinguish different philosophical schools and trends on the basis of the kinds of meanings they impart to their terms and the kinds of questions that pose difficulties for them

2) Core academic skills:

• Distinguishing the fine differences in the meaning of a single concept as is expressed through different , and how the accumulation of partial changes in meaning results in radical change which becomes the basis of a new philosophy • Perceiving the strong relationship between meaning, problem, and the problematic • Instilling of a passion for following the bibliographical history for a single concept (the self)

3) Personal and key skills:

• This course allows students to grasp philosophy by following the conflict between concepts, meanings, and questions, and how the history of philosophy is an expression of the reconstruction of concepts by changing their meanings on the basis of the needs of the age • This course allows students to make fine distinctions in how philosophers (and speculative theologians) use a single concept • Methodological competency, allowing students to discover their own individual style in philosophical writing while observing the rules of academic research • Awareness of the historicity of concepts and the importance of the ideological consequences of semantic change to a single concept • Skills in collective research and enjoyment of team spirit, but without being remiss in intellectual boldness, critical , and the ability for logical argumentation and open debate.

LEARNING/TEACHING METHODS

Teaching is delivered through three main forms:

• Lectures presenting the central ideas in the context and theory of the development of the issue of the self, and its successors (subjectivity and contingency). Lectures are based on primary sources as well as secondary literature • Seminars that act as an extension of the lectures to illuminate obscure points and encourage students to raise difficulties and highlight new points to consider. Seminars also provide an opportunity to train students, encouraging them to uncover problems in thinking, to carry out direct criticisms, and present new facts related to the lecture • Textual analysis: some seminars may be devoted to the reading and analysis of selected philosophical texts or extracts. They may also be for an oral presentation on a chapter or chapters from a source or on a notable study or on the student’s own research • Individual tutorials allowing for specialized training for students in writing up their research and articles, and find references and cite them. Tutorials are also an opportunity for students to ask questions and raise general academic and cultural issues of interest to them.

2

ASSIGNMENTS

• Research paper (2,000-2,500 words) on one of the topics associated with the philosophy of self course. These pieces of work should be of good , original, and show due regard for accuracy and academic , as well as research effort • Class participation – all students should demonstrate and develop their communication skills by contributing to the seminars; adding new facts and constructive criticism and questions. They should also demonstrate their skills in running the seminar discussion in a manner that allows everyone to join in the discussion effectively and positively • Notecard preparation and annotated bibliographies–these are to be prepared on a philosopher, concept, or issue related to philosophy of self • A final written exam that will test the knowledge and critical skills acquired during the course • Student’s involvement and cooperation in raising questions and contributing new solutions to disputed issues will be observed.

ASSESSMENT

Students’ knowledge and ability to understand, analyze, synthesize and write will be assessed in a number of ways:

1. The student’s knowledge and skills at analysis and synthesis will be identified by examining the articles and research papers they present in writing a. Essay 1 (1500-2000 words – 20%). This is due week 9 (i.e. immediately after the reading week). b. Essay 2 (3000 words – 40%). This is due week 12. 2. The student’s intellectual and research efforts will be assessed by a final exam of 3 hours, worth 40%.

SYLLABUS

The course centers on four themes:

I. The concept of “the self” as a synonym for essence in Greek philosophy and Arab-. This theme relies on three works with a crucial role in formulating the meaning of this concept: ’s De Anima, Analytica Posteriora, and Metaphysica (especially zeta and eta) and his commentators among the Arab and Muslim philosophers and speculative theologians

II. The idea of the shift in philosophy from an onto-teleological theory to a subjective theory as a result of the Cartesian revolution of the “I think” concept which was deepened by starting with Kant

III. Research into the currents that opposed the subjective tendency in contemporary philosophy that declared the death of the subject on the view that it was an illusion or a historical process in flux

IV. An examination of two calls to return either to the pre-Socratic idea () or the medieval idea open to divine inspiration (Leo Strauss).

3

Weekly Schedule

Week 1: The concept of the self Required Reading: اﳌﺼﺒﺎ�� ﻣﺤﻤﺪ: "ﺳﺆال اﻟﺬات".

ﻓﺘﺤﻴﺔ اﻟﺴﻌﻴﺪي، "ﺟﺪال اﻷﻧﺎ واﻵﺧﺮ- �� ﺳﺆال اﻟﺬاﺗﻴﺔ واﻟﻐ��ﻳﺔ"، ﺿﻤﻦ ﻣحجﻮب، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ: إﻋﺪاد، ﻓهﻢ اﻟﺬات، ﺗﻮ�ﺲ، دار �حﺮ، ٢٠٠٧.

Recommended Reading: ﻧﺼﺎر، ﻧﺎﺻﻴﻒ، اﻟﺬات وا�حﻀﻮر، ﺑ��وت، دار اﻟﻄﻠﻴﻌﺔ، ٢٠٠٨.

أو�ﻐﺮ، ﻻوﻟﻼﺗﻮﻣﺎ�ﻐﺎﺑ��ا، ﻳﻘﻈﺔ اﻟﺬات: ﺑﺮﻏﻤﺎﺗﻴﺔ ﺑﻼ ﺣﺪود، ت. إ��ﺎب ﻣﺤﻤﺪ،اﻟ�ﻮ�ﺖ، ﻋﺎﻟﻢ اﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ، ٢٠١٠.

ﻣحجﻮب، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ: إﻋﺪاد، ﻓهﻢ اﻟﺬات، ﺗﻮ�ﺲ، دار �حﺮ، ٢٠٠٧.

Kim Atkins, ed., (2005). Self and Subjectivity, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mansfield, Nick (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway. New York: New York University Press.

Désir d’identité, désir de l’autre, textes présentés par Mustapha Bencheikh, Meknès, Faculté des Lettres, 2002.

Week 2: Descartes’ I think – 1. Required Reading: دﻳ�ﺎرت، ر�نﻴﮫ، ﺗﺄﻣﻼت ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓ��ﻳﻘﻴﺔ �� اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ اﻷو��، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ا�حﺎج، ط٤، ﺑ��وت، دار ﻋﻮ�ﺪات، ١٩٨٨.

دﻳ�ﺎرت، ر�نﻴﮫ، ر�ﻨﮫ دﻳ�ﺎرت، ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ اﻟﻄﺮ�ﻘﺔ �حﺴﻦ ﻗﻴﺎدة اﻟﻌﻘﻞ وﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ا�حﻘﻴﻘﺔ �� اﻟﻌﻠﻮم، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺟﻤﻴﻞ ﺻﻠﻴﺒﺎ، ط٢، ﺑ��وت ١٩٧٠. Descartes, R., on First Philosophy. (J. Cottingham, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991).

Descartes, René : Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting one’s Reason and Seeking in the Sciences, tr. Richard Kennington, Focus Publishing, Newburyport, 2007.

Recommended Reading:

John Watling, “Dout, Knowledge and the Cogito in Descartes’” https://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/

Humber, James M. 1978. “Doubts About "descartes' Self-doubt"”. The Philosophical Review 87 (2). [Duke University Press, Philosophical Review]: 253–58. doi:10.2307/2184755.

4

Sievert, Donald. 1975. “Descartes's Self-doubt”. The Philosophical Review 84 (1). [Duke University Press, Philosophical Review]: 51–69. doi:10.2307/2184080

Week 3: Cogito – Descartes

Required and recommended reading: Same as above.

Week 4: Self legislation – Self Required Reading: �ﺎﻧﻂ، إﻳﻤﺎﻧﻮ�ﻞ: ﻧﻘﺪ اﻟﻌﻘﻞ ا�حﺾ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻏﺎﻧﻢ هﻨﺎ، ﺑ��وت، اﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ اﻟﻌﺮ�ﻴﺔ ﻟﻠ��ﺟﻤﺔ،

�ﺎﻧﻂ، ﻋﻤﺎﻧﻮ�ﻞ: ﻧﻘﺪ اﻟﻌﻘﻞ ا�حﺾ، ﻣﻮ�ىى وهﺒﺔ، ﺑ��وت، ﻣﺮﻛﺰ اﻹﻧﻤﺎء اﻟﻘﻮﻣﻲ، Kant, E. Critique of Pure Reason. (N. K. Smith, Trans.). London: St Martin’s., 1968.

Kant, E., Anthropologie d’un point de vue pragmatique. De la faculté d’imaginer, tr. Alexandra Makoziak, Paris, 1999.

Stine, William D.. 1975. “Self- in Kant's 'critique of Pure Reason'”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic 28 (3). Springer: 189– 97. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/4318974.

Chauvier, Stephane. 2001. “Kant et L'égologie”. Archives De Philosophie 64 (4). Centre Sèvres – Facultés jésuites de Paris: http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/43037946.

Recommended Reading: �ﺎﻧﻂ، ع.: اﳌﺒﺎدئ اﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓ��ﻗﺎ اﻷﺧﻼق، ت ﺣﻜﻤﺔ ﺣﻤ��ي، ﺣﻠﺐ، ب.ت.

أﺣﻤﺪ، ﻣﺤﻤﻮد ﺳﻴﺪ: دراﺳﺎت �� ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ �ﺎﻧﻂ اﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ، اﻟﻘﺎهﺮة ١٩٨٨.

اﳌﺼﺒﺎ��، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ (ﻣﺸﺮف): اﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ اﻟ�ﺎﻧﻄﻲ ﻟ�حﺪاﺛﺔ، اﻟﺮ�ﺎط، ﻣنﺸﻮرات �ﻠﻴﺔ اﻵداب واﻟﻌﻠﻮم اﻹ�ﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ، ٢٠٠٥.

�ﺎﻧﻂ: ا�حﺪاﺛﺔ ا�جﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ وا�حﺪاﺛﺔ اﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ، ﻗﺮﻃﺎج، ٢٠٠٥.

اﳌﺼﺒﺎ��، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ (ﻣﺸﺮف): ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ ا�حﻖ: �ﺎﻧﻂ واﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ اﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮة، اﻟﺮ�ﺎط، ﻣنﺸﻮرات �ﻠﻴﺔ اﻵداب واﻟﻌﻠﻮم اﻹ�ﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ، ٢٠٠٧.

ﻣﻨﺼﻒ، ﻋﺒﺪ ا�حﻖ، �ﺎﻧﻂ ورهﺎﻧﺎت اﻟﺘﻔﻜ�� اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻲ: ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ إ�� ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ اﻟﻨﻘﺪ، اﻟﺪار اﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎء، إﻓﺮ�ﻘﻴﺎ اﻟﺸﺮق، ٢٠٠٧.

أوراق ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻴﺔ: ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ اﻟﻌﻘﻞ إ�� أوﻧﻄﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ اﻟﻌﺼﺮ: �ﺎﻧﻂ �� اﻟﺬﻛﺮى اﳌﺌﻮ�ﺔ اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻮﻓﺎﺗﮫ، اﻟﻌﺪد ١١، ٢٠٠٤.

Matthieu Giroux, « Kant : critique du cogito cartésien » ;

5

Week 5: Nietzsche’s perspective on Self Required Reading: Miller, J. Hillis. 1981. “The disarticulation of the self in Nietzsche”. The Monist 64 (2). Oxford University Press: 247–61. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/27902694.

Grimm, Ruediger Herman. 1979. “Circularity and self-reference in Nietzsche”. 10 (3/4). Wiley: 289–305. http://0- www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/24435387.

Recommended Reading:

اﻟﺸﻴﺦ، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ، ﻧﻘﺪ ا�حﺪاﺛﺔ �� ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻴتﺸﮫ، ٢٠٠٨.

ﻧﻴتﺸﮫ ﻧ�ي اﳌﺘﻔﻮق ، ﻳﻮﺣﻨﺎ ﻗﻤ��

ﺑﻴﺎر هﻴ��-ﺳﻮﻓﺮ�ﻦ: زرادﺷﺖ ﻧﻴتﺸﮫ ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ أﺳﺎﻣﺔ ا�حﺎج، ٢٠٠٠.

ﻓﺮدر�ﻚ ﻧﻴتﺸﮫ : ﻧ�ي ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ اﻟﻘﻮة / إﻋﺪاد �ﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻮ�ﻀﺔ ١٩٩٣.

ﻟﻮ�ﺎ�ﺶ، تﺣﻄﻴﻢ اﻟﻌﻘﻞ ٢ : ﺷﻮ���ﺎور ، ﻛ��ﻛﻐﺎرد ، ﻧﻴتﺸﮫ، Nietzsche, Ecce Homo, coll. Meditation, Paris, Gonthier, Paris, 1971.

Heidegger, Martin, Nietzsche II, tr. Pierre Klosowki, Paris, Gallimard, 1981.

Vincent Jean-Marie, “Le sujet et l’individu”, https://www.multitudes.net!Le-Sujet-et-l-individu

Week 6: Self in - 1 Required Reading:

ر��ﻮر، ﺑﻮل: اﻟﺬات ﻋﻴ��ﺎ �ﺂﺧﺮ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ وﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ و�ﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺟﻮرج ز�ﻨﺎ�ﻲ، ٢٠٠٥.

ر��ﻮر، ﺑﻮل: ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ اﻹرادة: اﻹ�ﺴﺎن ا�خﻄﺎء، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﺪﻧﺎن ﻧﺠﻴﺐ اﻟﺪﻳﻦ، ٢٠٠٨.

Sauer, James B., and Randall R. Lyle. 1997. “Narrative, Truth, and Self: The Hermeneutical Mistake of ”. The Personalist Forum 13 (2). University of Illinois Press: 195–222. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/20708755.

Anderson, Pamela Sue. 1994. “Agnosticism and Attestation: An Aporia Concerning the in Ricoeur's "oneself as Another"”. The Journal of Religion 74 (1). University of Chicago Press: 65– 76. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/1203615.

Recommended Reading: Henry Venema, "Oneself as another or another as oneself?", in Literature and Theology, Vol. 16, No. 4 (December 2002), pp. 410-426.

6

Hermeneutics Author(s): David Couzens Hoy, Social Research,Vol. 47, No. 4, Philosophy: An Assessment (WINTER 1980), pp. 649-671.

Narratie, "Truth, and Self: The Hermeneutical of Social Constructionism",The Personalist Forum, Vol. 13, No. 2 (all 1997), pp. 19-222 .

Week 7: Self in hermeneutics - 2 Required and recommended reading: Same as above.

Week 8: The Self in phenomenology Required Reading: هﻮﺳﺮل، ادﻣﻮن، ﻓﻜﺮة اﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻓﺘ�� اﻧﻘﺰو، ٢٠٠٧.

اﳌﺴﻜﻴ�ي، ﻓﺘ��: اﻟهﻮ�ﺔ واﻟﺰﻣﺎن، ﺗﺄو�ﻼت ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ’اﻟﻨﺤﻦ‘، ﺑ��وت، دار اﻟﻄﻠﻴﻌﺔ، ٢٠٠١.

Miller, Izchak. 1986. “Husserl and Sartre on the Self”. The Monist 69 (4). Oxford University Press: 534–45. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/27902997.

Recommended Reading:

إﻧﻘﺰو، ﻓﺘ��: هﻮﺳﺮل وﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮوﻩ : ﻣﻦ ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ اﻟﻠﻐﺔ إ�� ﺗﺄو�ﻠﻴﺔ اﻟﻔهﻢ ، ٢٠٠٨.

در�ﺪا، ﺟﺎك: اﻟﺼﻮت واﻟﻈﺎهﺮة : ﻣﺪﺧﻞ إ�� ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ اﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ �� ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ هﻮﺳﺮل ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ وﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻓﺘ�� إﻧﻘﺰو، ٢٠٠٥.

Lingis, Alphonso. 1986. “The Self in Itself”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 54 (3). [Oxford University Press, American Academy of Religion]: 529–34. http://0- www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/1464566.

Week 9: Self in : Sartre Required Reading:

ﺳﺎرﺗﺮ، ﺟﺎن ﺑﻮل: اﻟﻮﺟﻮد واﻟﻌﺪم، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ ﺑﺪوي، ﺑ��وت، دار اﻵداب، ١٩٥٣، اﻟﺒﺎب اﻟﺜﺎ�ﻲ، اﻟﻔﺼﻞ اﻷول.

ﺑﺪوي، ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ: دراﺳﺎت �� اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ اﻟﻮﺟﻮدﻳﺔ، ﺑ��وت، اﳌﺆﺳﺴﺔ اﻟﻌﺮ�ﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪراﺳﺎت واﻟنﺸﺮ: ١٩٨٠. Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, translated by , Hazel E. Barnes, Routledge

Pierre-Jean Renaudie, “Me, myself and I: Sartre and Husserl on elusiveness of the self”, ContPhilos Rev (2013) 46:99–113.

Desan, Wilfrid. 1984. “Beyond the Self in Sartre”. Review of Sartre and Marxist Existentialism. The Review of Politics 46 (4). [University of Notre Dame du lac on behalf of Review of Politics, Cambridge University Press]: 635–37. http://0- www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/1406716.

7

Elrod, John W.. 1973. “The Self in Kierkegaard's Pseudonyms”. International Journal for 4 (4). Springer: 218–40. http://0- www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/40021041.

Recommended Reading: ﺟﻮﻟﻴﭭﻴﮫ، ر�ﺠيﺲ: اﳌﺬاهﺐ اﻟﻮﺟﻮدﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛ��ﻛﻴﺠﻮر إ�� ﺳﺎرﺗﺮ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﻓﺆاد �ﺎﻣﻞ، دار اﻵداب، ١٩٨٨.

ﻓﻘﻴﮫ، أﺣﻤﺪ،:أﻧ��و�ﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺳﺎرﺗﺮ واﳌﺎرﻛﺴﻴﺔ : اﻟﻨﺪرة واﻟﻌﻨﻒ ، ٢٠١٠.

ﺣﺮب، ﺳﻌﺎد: اﻻﻧﺎ واﻻﺧﺮ وا�جﻤﺎﻋﺔ : دراﺳﺔ �� ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﺳﺎرﺗﺮ وﻣﺴﺮﺣﮫ، ١٩٩٤.

ﻋﻮ�ﻀﺔ، �ﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ (إﻋﺪاد): ﺟﺎن ﺑﻮل ﺳﺎرﺗﺮ : ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮف ا�حﺮ�ﺔ، ١٩٩٣.

Week 10: Heidegger and the critique of Self Required Reading: Haar, Michel, Heidegger et l'essence de l'homme, Groenoble, Jéeômz Million, 1990

Miller, Izchak. 1986. “Husserl and Sartre on the self”. The Monist 69 (4). Oxford University Press: 534–45. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/27902997.

Recommended Reading: اﳌﺴﻜﻴ�ي، ﻓﺘ��: اﻟﺘﻔﻜ�� �ﻌﺪ هﻴﺪﻏﺮ أو ﻛﻴﻒ ا�خﺮوج ﻣﻦ اﻟﻌﺼﺮ اﻟﺘﺄو��� ﻟﻠﻌﻘﻞ،٢٠١١.

ﻟﻜﺤﻞ ، ﻓﻴﺼﻞ: 35T إﺷ�ﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﺄﺳيﺲ اﻟﺪاز�ﻦ Dasein �� أوﻧﻄﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﻣﺎرﺗﻦ هﻴﺪﻏﺮ، ٢٠١١.

ﻣهﻨﺎﻧﺔ ، إﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ: ا ﻟ ﻮجود وا�حﺪاﺛﺔ : هﻴﺪﻏﺮ �� ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮة اﻟﻌﻘﻞ ا�حﺪﻳﺚ، ٢٠١٢.

Kim Atkins, ed., (2005). Self and Subjectivity, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Week 11: Self-absorption: Foucault 1 Required Reading: ﻣيﺸﻴﻞ ﻓﻮ�ﻮ، اﻻ��ﻤﺎم ﺑﺎﻟﺬات، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ، ﺑ��وت، ﻣﺮﻛﺰ اﻹﻧﻤﺎء اﻟﻘﻮﻣﻲ، ١٩٩٢.

ﻓﻮ�ﻮ ، ﻣيﺸﻴﻞ: ﺗﺄو�ﻞ اﻟﺬات : دروس أﻟﻘﻴﺖ �� "اﻟ�ﻮﻟﻴﺞ دوﻓﺮا�ﺲ" ﻟﺴﻨﺔ ١٩٨١-١٩٨٢ ، ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ اﻟﺰواوي �ﻐﻮرة، ٢٠١١. Stephanie M. Batters, Care of the Self and the Will to Freedom: Michel Foucault, Critique and Ethics, http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1241&context=srho norsprog

Florian Bratu, « discours et sujet chez Michel Foucault. quand dire c’est (le) pouvoir », R o c s i r, RevistaRomân_ de Studii Culturale (pe Internet), 1 / 2000 http://www.rocsir.usv.ro/archiv/2000_1/3CristianBratu.pdf

8

Week 12: Self-absorption: Foucault 2 Required and recommended reading: Same as above.

Week 13: Habermas: from subject to inter-subjectivity 1 Required Reading: Rasor, Paul. 2000. “Intersubjective communication and the self in Wieman and habermas”. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 21 (3). University of Illinois Press: 269– 87. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/27944127

Grady, Hugh H., and Susan Wells. 1985. “Toward a rhetoric of intersubjectivity: introducing jürgenhabermas”. Journal of Advanced Composition 6. JAC: 33–47. http://0- www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/20865585.

Recommended Reading: أﻓﺎﻳﺔ، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻮراﻟﺪﻳﻦ: ا�حﺪاﺛﺔ واﻟﺘﻮاﺻﻞ �� اﻟﻔﺴﻠﻔﺔ اﻟﻨﻘﺪﻳﺔ اﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮة :ﻧﻤﻮذج هﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎس،

ﺣﺴﻦ، أﺑﻮ اﻟﻨﻮر ﺣﻤﺪي: ﻳﻮرﺟ�ن هﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎس : ا ﻷﺧ ﻼق واﻟﺘﻮاﺻﻞ،

ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻼوي ، اﻟﻨﺎﺻﺮ: الهﻮ�ﺔ واﻟﺘﻮاﺻﻠﻴﺔ : �� ﺗ ﻔ ﻜ � � هﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎس، ٢٠١٢.

ﻣﺼﺪق، ﺣﺴﻦ: ﻳﻮرﻏﻦ هﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎس وﻣﺪرﺳﺔ ﻓﺮاﻧﻜﻔﻮرت: اﻟﻨﻈﺮ�ﺔ اﻟﻨﻘﺪﻳﺔ اﻟﺘﻮاﺻﻠﻴﺔ، اﻟﺪار اﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎء-ﺑ��وت، اﳌﺮﻛﺰ اﻟﺜﻘﺎ�� اﻟﻌﺮ�ﻲ، ٢٠٠٥.

Whitebook, Joel. 1989. “Intersubjectivity and the Monadic Core of the Psyche: Habermas and Castoriadis on the Unconscious”. Revue Européenne Des Sciences Sociales 27 (86). Librairie Droz: 225–44. http://0- www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/40369870.

Dews, Peter. 1995. “THE PARADIGM SHIFT TO COMMUNICATION AND THE QUESTION OF SUBJECTIVITY: REFLECTIONS ON HABERMAS, LACAN AND MEAD”. Revue Internationale De Philosophie 49 (194 (4)). Revue Internationale de Philosophie: 483– 519. http://0-www.jstor.org.library.qnl.qa/stable/23954538.

Week 14: Habermas: from subject to inter-subjectivity 2 Required and recommended reading: Same as above.

9