DOCSLIB.ORG

Louisiana Oyster Landings, 2000-2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Updated November 23, 2016 LouisianaFishery OysterManagement Plan Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Office of Fisheries Authors: Patrick Banks, Steve Beck, Katie Chapiesky, and Jack Isaacs Editor/Point of Contact: Katie Chapiesky, kchapiesky@ wlf.la.gov 1 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 INTRODUCTION 8 Definition of Management Unit 8 Management Authority and Process 8 Management Goals and Objectives 8 DESCRIPTION OF THE STOCK 9 Biological Profile 9 Physical Description 9 Distribution 9 Habitat 10 Reproduction 10 Age and Growth 10 Predator-Prey Relationships 10 Stock Status and Assessment Methods 11 Stock Unit Definition 11 Current Stock Assessment 11 Reference Points 12 Harvest Control Rules 12 Oyster Monitoring and Assessment Methods 13 Stock Resilience 15 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY 17 Data Collection and Analyses 17 Commercial Fishery 18 Volume and Value of Landings 18 Landings by Season 20 Landings by Gear Type 20 Landings by Vessel Length 23 Landings by Area 24 Seed Harvest 25 Commercial Oystermen 27 2 Fishing Effort 27 Seafood Dealers 30 Fresh Products Licenseholders 31 Oyster Processors 31 Oyster Imports 33 Recreational Fishery 36 Economic Conditions 37 Interactions with Other Fisheries or User Groups 37 ECOSYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS 38 Ecosystem Considerations 38 Habitat 38 Bycatch and Discards 40 Lost or Abandoned Fishing Gear 40 Environmental Factors 41 Hydrological Conditions 41 Invasive Species 41 Predation 41 Competition from Other Species 42 Diseases and Parasites 42 Climate and Weather 42 Ocean Acidification 42 Other Fisheries and Aquaculture 42 Habitat Loss and Restoration 42 Freshwater Diversions 43 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill 43 FISHERY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 44 Management Framework 44 Authorities 45 Louisiana 45 Regional 47 Existing Management Measures 48 3 Table of Contents Plans 48 General Management Process 48 Statutes and Rules 50 Other 54 Compliance 56 Reporting Methods and Requirements 56 Recordkeeping Requirements 57 Enforcement 57 Penalties 57 Other States’ Oyster Rules and Regulations 57 CURRENT ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT OPTIONS 58 Degradation of Habitat on Public Oyster Areas 58 Decline in Oyster Abundance on Public Oyster Areas 59 Coastal Restoration, Flood Control, and Freshwater Diversion Projects 60 Water Quality 60 Strengthening and Supporting Enforcement Capabilities 61 FUTURE RESEARCH AND DATA NEEDS 62 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 65 LITERATURE CITED 66 APPENDICES 70 Appendix I. 2014 Oyster Stock Assessment Report 70 Appendix II. History of Cultch Plants on Louisiana’s Public Water Bottoms 173 Appendix III. Louisiana Revised Statutes 56:638.1-5. Fish Conservation, Management, and Sustainability: Intent, Findings, Purpose, Policy, and Fishery Standards 177 Appendix IV. Louisiana Legislative Process 179 Appendix V. Authorities of the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission 181 Appendix VI. Authorities of the Secretary, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries 183 Appendix VII. Louisiana’s Compliance with Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Oyster Fishery Management Recommendations 186 Appendix VIII. Federal Management Institutions 188 Appendix IX. Federal Laws, Regulations, and Policies 191 Appendix X. Commercial and Recreational Oyster Regulations—Detailed Text 194 Appendix XI. Chronology of Major Changes to Louisiana’s Oyster Regulations 208 Appendix XII. Penalties for Regulatory Violations 211 Appendix XIII. Summary of Other States’ Commercial Oyster Regulations 213 4 List of Tables and Figures Tables Table 1. Statewide quadrat sampling program summary for 2015. 13 Table 2. Statewide dredge sampling program summary for 2015. 14 Table 3: FAO proposed guideline for indices of productivity for exploited aquatic species. 16 Table 4. Volume and real value of oyster landings by region, 2000-2014. 19 Table 5. Volume and real value of Eastern oyster landings by region and Gulf state, 2000-2014. 21 Table 6. Average monthly volume and real value of Louisiana oyster landings, 2000-2014. 22 Table 7. Volume of Louisiana oyster landings by gear type, 2000-2014. 22 Table 8. Percentage of total volume of oysters landed by vessel category, 2000-2014. 23 Table 9. Volume, real value, and price per pound of Louisiana oyster landings, public vs. private oyster areas, 25 2000-2014. Table 10. Average volume, real value, and price per pound of Louisiana oyster landings by major estuarine basin, 25 2000-2014. Table 11. Volume of Louisiana oyster landings by major estuarine basin, 2000-2014. 26 Table 12. Volume of seed harvest by CSA, 2000-2014. 26 Table 13. Number of commercial fishermen with resident and nonresident oyster harvester licenses and number 28 reporting oyster landings in Louisiana, 2000-2014. Table 14. Number of commercial oyster gear licenses issued by LDWF, 2000-2014. 29 Table 15. Number of commercial fishing trips reporting oyster landings in Louisiana, total and public vs. private 29 oyster areas, 2000-2014. Table 16. Length of commercial fishing trips reporting oyster landings in Louisiana, 2000-2014. 30 Table 17. Average volume of oysters landed per commercial oyster harvesting trip, total and public vs. private oyster 30 areas, 2000-2014. Table 18. Number of licensed Louisiana seafood dealers reporting oyster transactions, 2000-2014. 31 Table 19. Total volume and value of oysters purchased, by dealer license type, 2000-2014. 32 Table 20. Number of Louisiana fresh products licenseholders and their retail oyster sales by total volume and value, 2000-2014. 32 Table 21. Volume and real value of oyster products reported as processed in Louisiana, 2000-2013. 32 Table 22. Volume and real value of total U.S. oyster imports, 2000-2014. 34 Table 23. Number of resident and nonresident recreational oyster tong licenses issued by LDWF, 2000-2014. 36 Figures Figure 1. Map of Louisiana’s public and private oyster areas. 11 5 List of Tables and Figures Figure 2. Map of Louisiana’s CSAs. 13 Figure 3. Average volume of oyster landings by region, 2000-2014. 19 Figure 4. Real value of oyster landings by region, 2000-2014. 19 Figure 5. Volume of imported oyster products by product form, 2000-2014. 34 Figure 6. Real value of imported oyster products by product form, 2000-2014. 34 Figure 7. Top source countries for U.S. imports of farmed and wild live, fresh, frozen, dried, salted, or brine 35 oysters by volume, 2000-2014. Figure 8. Top source countries for U.S. imports of farmed and wild live, fresh, frozen, dried, salted, or brine 35 oysters by value, 2000-2014. Figure 9. Volume of oyster products imported into the United States by U.S. region, 2000-2014. 35 Figure 10. Real value of oyster products imported into the United States by U.S. region, 2000-2014. 36 6 Folio Executive Summary Oysters thrive in Louisiana’s estuaries and provide important socioeconomic and ecological value to the state. They have been harvested commercially in Louisiana since the mid 1800s and continue to be the foundation of one of the state’s most important seafood industries. Today, Louisiana’s oyster resource supports the fifth largest fishery (by volume) and fourth most valuable fishery in the state. Louisiana is the top harvester of oysters in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and has led the United States in oyster landings every year since 2000. Louisiana also benefits from the ecological services oysters provide, including habitat for a variety of fish and invertebrates, shoreline stabilization, and improved water quality. SHUCKED OYstERS AND SHELLS. In general, oysters in Louisiana are a productive and resilient natural resource, which is a result of the stock’s large spatial distribution, fast growth, and high fecundity. This fishery management plan creates a centralized document that summarizes current information about the biology and status of the oyster resource in Louisiana, Louisiana’s commercial and recreational fisheries for oyster, effects of Louisiana’s oyster fishery on the ecosystem, and environmental influences on Louisiana’s oyster resource. In addition, this plan describes management approaches within the state and regional framework, defines long-term management goals and objectives, identifies management issues, recommends options to address these issues, and outlines future research needs. CLOSEUP OF AN OYstER. 7 Introduction Definition of Management Unit 1. Develop and adopt reference points for fishing mortality and population abundance that incorporate The management unit consists of the Eastern (American) habitat maintenance, and determine the status of the oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and its fisheries on natural oyster stock and fishery according to these habitat- and artificially constructed hard-bottom habitat in the based reference points. nearshore estuarine environment along the coast of Louisiana. 2. Prevent overfishing and rebuild depleted populations. Management Authority and Process 3. Maintain an ecologically successful and reproductively stable population of oysters within The Louisiana State Legislature (Legislature), the each major estuarine basin of the state where oyster Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission resources currently exist. (Commission), and the Louisiana Department of Wildlife 4. Define and achieve a level of fishing capacity that and Fisheries (LDWF) are responsible for managing the provides for a sustainable harvest and allows for a oyster fishery in Louisiana’s state waters, which extend profitable fishery. seaward from the shoreline to 9 nautical miles. 5. Minimize conflicts among user groups, when Louisiana
Recommended publications
  • Shellfish Reefs at Risk

    Shellfish Reefs at Risk

    SHELLFISH REEFS AT RISK A Global Analysis of Problems and Solutions Michael W. Beck, Robert D. Brumbaugh, Laura Airoldi, Alvar Carranza, Loren D. Coen, Christine Crawford, Omar Defeo, Graham J. Edgar, Boze Hancock, Matthew Kay, Hunter Lenihan, Mark W. Luckenbach, Caitlyn L. Toropova, Guofan Zhang CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 10 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Condition of Oyster Reefs Globally Across Bays and Ecoregions ............ 14 Regional Summaries of the Condition of Shellfish Reefs ............................ 15 Overview of Threats and Causes of Decline ................................................................ 28 Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration and Management ................ 30 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 36 References .............................................................................................................................
  • Early Ontogeny of Jurassic Bakevelliids and Their Bearing on Bivalve Evolution

    Early Ontogeny of Jurassic Bakevelliids and Their Bearing on Bivalve Evolution

    Early ontogeny of Jurassic bakevelliids and their bearing on bivalve evolution NIKOLAUS MALCHUS Malchus, N. 2004. Early ontogeny of Jurassic bakevelliids and their bearing on bivalve evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49 (1): 85–110. Larval and earliest postlarval shells of Jurassic Bakevelliidae are described for the first time and some complementary data are given concerning larval shells of oysters and pinnids. Two new larval shell characters, a posterodorsal outlet and shell septum are described. The outlet is homologous to the posterodorsal notch of oysters and posterodorsal ridge of arcoids. It probably reflects the presence of the soft anatomical character post−anal tuft, which, among Pteriomorphia, was only known from oysters. A shell septum was so far only known from Cassianellidae, Lithiotidae, and the bakevelliid Kobayashites. A review of early ontogenetic shell characters strongly suggests a basal dichotomy within the Pterio− morphia separating taxa with opisthogyrate larval shells, such as most (or all?) Praecardioida, Pinnoida, Pterioida (Bakevelliidae, Cassianellidae, all living Pterioidea), and Ostreoida from all other groups. The Pinnidae appear to be closely related to the Pterioida, and the Bakevelliidae belong to the stem line of the Cassianellidae, Lithiotidae, Pterioidea, and Ostreoidea. The latter two superfamilies comprise a well constrained clade. These interpretations are con− sistent with recent phylogenetic hypotheses based on palaeontological and genetic (18S and 28S mtDNA) data. A more detailed phylogeny is hampered by the fact that many larval shell characters are rather ancient plesiomorphies. Key words: Bivalvia, Pteriomorphia, Bakevelliidae, larval shell, ontogeny, phylogeny. Nikolaus Malchus [[email protected]], Departamento de Geologia/Unitat Paleontologia, Universitat Autòno− ma Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.
  • Chapter I Taxonomy

    Chapter I Taxonomy

    THE AMERICAN OYSTER CRASSOSTREA VIRGINICA GMELIN By PAUL S. GALTSOFF, Fishery Biologist BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES CHAPTER I TAXONOMY Page This broad characterization included a number Taxonomic characters _ 4 SheIL _ 4 of genera such as scallops, pen shells (Pinnidae), Anatomy _ 4 Sex and spawnlng _ limas (Limidae) and other mollusks which ob­ 4 Habitat _ 5 viously are not oysters. In the 10th edition of Larvll! shell (Prodlssoconch) _ 6 "Systema Naturae," Linnaeus (1758) wrote: The genera of living oysters _ 6 Genus 08trea _ 6 "Ostreae non orones, imprimis Pectines, ad Genus Cra8808trea _ 7 Genus Pycnodonte _ cardinem interne fulcis transversis numerosis 7 Bibliography _ 14 parallelis in utraque testa oppositis gaudentiquae probe distinguendae ab Areis polypleptoginglymis, The family Ostreidae consists of a large number cujus dentes numerosi alternatim intrant alterius of edibleand nonedible oysters. Their distribution sinus." Le., not all are oysters, in particular the is confined to a broad belt of coastal waters within scallops, which have many parallel ribs running the latitudes 64° N. and 44° S. With few excep­ crosswise inward toward the hinge on each shell tions oysters thrive in shallow water, their vertical on opposite sides; these should properly be dis­ distribution extending from a level approximately tinguished from Area polyleptoginglymis whose halfway between high and low tide levels to a many teeth alternately enter between the teeth depth of about 100 feet. Commercially exploited of the other side. oyster beds are rarely found below a depth of 40 In the same publication the European flat feet. oyster, Ostrea edulis, is described as follows: The· name "Ostrea" was given by Linnaeus "Vulgo Ostrea dictae edulis.
  • Spread of the Slipper Limpet Crepidula Fornicata (L. 1758) in Europe

    Spread of the Slipper Limpet Crepidula Fornicata (L. 1758) in Europe

    SCI. MAR., 61 (Sup 2): 109-118 SCIENTIA MARINA 1997 ECOLOGY OF MARINE MOLLUSCS. J.D. ROS and A. GUERRA (eds.) Spread of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L. 1758) in Europe. Current state and consequences* MICHEL BLANCHARD Laboratoire d'Écologie. Institut Français de Recherche et d'Exploitation de la Mer. BP 70-Plouzané-29280. France. SUMMARY: The present distribution of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in Europe is described in detail for each country, and an overview provided thanks to new information. Main observations of introduction and spread, obtained from the literature, are discussed. For most of them, we observe that both aspects are due to oyster harvesting and farming. In the most heavily infested areas (France, England, the Netherlands), activities of dredging, harvesting and oyster farming have been disrupted. In France, these activities are so much hampered that treatment methods are now developed. Key words: Slipper limpet, Crepidula fornicata, invasions, Europe. RESUMEN: EXPANSIÓN DE LA SEBA CREPIDULA FORNICATA (L., 1758) EN EUROPA. SITUACIÓN ACTUAL Y CONSECUENCIAS. – Se presenta la distribución actual de la seba (Crepidula fornicata) en Europa, para cada país, a través de las informaciones más recientes. Se discuten las principales observaciones sobre la introducción y proliferación de esta especie, obtenidas de la bibliografía. En la mayoría, la ostreicultura es responsable de ambas fases. En las áreas más afectadas (Francia, Inglaterra, Holanda), el dragado y la ostreicultura se han visto perturbadas. El impacto de esta especie introducida sobre las activida- des marisqueras es muy importante, por lo que se deberían desarollar medios de erradicación. Palabras clave: Seba, Crepidula fornicata, invasiones, Europa.
  • NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program And

    NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program And

    NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program and Abstracts of the 110th Annual Meeng March 18 – 22, 2018 Seale, Washington NSA 110th ANNUAL MEETING National Shellfisheries Association Renaissance Hotel, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON March 18 – March 22, 2018 SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 2018 6:30 PM STUDENT ORIENTATION (Foyer outside Courtyard Ballroom) 7:00 PM PRESIDENT’S RECEPTION Courtyard Ballroom MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30-8:00 AM STUDENT BREAKFAST (students only) South 8:00-8:50 AM PLENARY LECTURE: Suzanne Williams (Natural History Museum, London) Courtyard Ballroom Federal Superior Municipal James North SHELLFISH LEASING AND GENETICS, THE SHRIMP OLYMPIA PERMITTING WORKSHOP: 9:00-10:30 AM GENOMICS, AND EPIGENOME OYSTERS CASE STUDIES FOR OVERCOMING SCALLOPS BREEDING (SHRIMPENCODE) COMMON LEGAL BARRIERS PROJECT 10:30-11:00AM MORNING BREAK THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME 11:00-12:30PM GENOMICS, AND SCALLOPS OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) BREEDING PROJECT 12:30-1:30 PM LUNCH BREAK THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME 1:30-2:15 PM GENOMICS, AND SCALLOPS OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) BREEDING PROJECT THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME GENERAL 2:15-3:00 PM GENOMICS, AND OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) CONTRIBUTED I BREEDING PROJECT 3:00-3:30 PM AFTERNOON BREAK THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME GENERAL 3:30-6:00 PM GENOMICS, AND OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) CONTRIBUTED I BREEDING PROJECT TUESDAY,
  • Inventory, Monitoring and Impact Assessment of Marine Biodiversity in the Seri Indian Territory, Gulf of California, Mexico

    Inventory, Monitoring and Impact Assessment of Marine Biodiversity in the Seri Indian Territory, Gulf of California, Mexico

    INVENTORY, MONITORING AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF MARINE BIODIVERSITY IN THE SERI INDIAN TERRITORY, GULF OF CALIFORNIA, MEXICO by Jorge Torre Cosío ________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHYLOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES STUDIES In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 2 1 Sign defense sheet 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED:____________________________ 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) and the Wallace Research Foundation provided fellowships to the author. The Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (grant FB463/L179/97), World Wildlife Fund (WWF) México and Gulf of California Program (grants PM93 and QP68), and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (grant 2000-0351) funded this study.
  • The History of Oyster Farming in Australia

    The History of Oyster Farming in Australia

    The History of Oyster Farming in Australia JOHN A. NELL Introduction and Sydney rock oysters were collected 1981) and natural oyster beds (Malcolm, for consumption by Aborigines along the 1987). As Europeans increased in num­ Oyster production in Australia, in- coastal regions of eastern Australia; some bers, they depleted the natural oyster volves five species, namely the Sydney of the shell deposits in Aboriginal kitchen stocks. Government officials banned the rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, middens can be quite substantial, up to burning of oyster shells for lime in NSW formerly known as S. commercialis; 400 m long and 4 m high (Bailey, 1975). in 1868 (Malcolm, 1987), and soon after, Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas; flat Middens in northern New South Wales oyster farming began (Roughly, 1925; oyster, Ostrea angasi; and two tropical (NSW) (Bailey, 1975) and southern Smith, 1985). species, the coral rock or milky oyster, Queensland (Catterall and Poiner, 1987) Commercial production of oysters Saccostrea cucullata, and the black-lip consist largely of Sydney rock oysters in Australia began simultaneously with oyster, Striostrea (Parastriostrea) myti- and in central NSW, where flat oysters the farming of the Sydney rock oyster in loides, formerly known as Saccostrea are now rare, they consist of a mix of NSW and southern Queensland around echinata. The Sydney rock, Pacific, and flat and Sydney rock oysters. However in 1870 (Roughley, 1922; Smith, 1985). It flat oysters have been farmed. Before Eu- southern Australia, the middens consist began with the exploitation by dredging ropeans settled in Australia, flat oysters largely of flat oyster shells (Sullivan, of oyster beds (5–20 m deep) and har­ 1984).
  • Martin County Oyster Reef Restoration Project: a Compilation and Summary of Four Short-Term Biological Monitoring Studies

    Martin County Oyster Reef Restoration Project: a Compilation and Summary of Four Short-Term Biological Monitoring Studies

    MARTIN COUNTY OYSTER REEF RESTORATION PROJECT: A COMPILATION AND SUMMARY OF FOUR SHORT-TERM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING STUDIES June 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: CSA International, Inc. Melanie L. Parker and Stephen P. Geiger, Ph.D. 8502 SW Kansas Avenue Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Stuart, Florida 34997 100 Eighth Avenue SE Telephone: (772) 219-3000 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5020 Telephone: (727) 896-8626 C. Edward Proffitt, Ph.D. Hilde Zenil Zachary Jud Elizabeth Salewski Vincent Encomio, Ph.D. Craig Layman, Ph.D. Florida Atlantic University Florida Oceanographic Society Florida International University Ft. Pierce, Florida Stuart, Florida Miami, Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Short-term Biological Monitoring Studies ............................................................................................ 1 Oyster Density and Biology .................................................................................................................. 2 Oyster Reef Community Analyses ........................................................................................................ 2 Reef Structure ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary ..............................................................................................................................................
  • The Dynamic and Distribution of Food Supplies for the Sydney Rock Oyster in Southern NSW Estuaries

    The Dynamic and Distribution of Food Supplies for the Sydney Rock Oyster in Southern NSW Estuaries

    University of Wollongong Research Online Shoalhaven Marine & Freshwater Centre Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2008 The Dynamic and Distribution of Food Supplies for the Sydney rock oyster in southern NSW estuaries Ana M. Rubio University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/smfc Recommended Citation Rubio, Ana M., "The Dynamic and Distribution of Food Supplies for the Sydney rock oyster in southern NSW estuaries" (2008). Shoalhaven Marine & Freshwater Centre. 10. https://ro.uow.edu.au/smfc/10 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The Dynamic and Distribution of Food Supplies for the Sydney rock oyster in southern NSW estuaries Abstract The primary outcome of this study has been to increase the understanding of the environmental drivers that influence the southern NSW Sydney rock oyster (SRO) industry, in particular in the Clyde and Crookhaven/Shoalhaven estuaries and to identify some of the factors that limit the production of SRO. Increased amounts of nitrogen and organic carbon are delivered by increased river flows following ainr events and these were found to significantly enhance ystero growth in the two south NSW estuaries. During normal and/or dry conditions, the estuaries were nitrogen-limited suppressing primary production and, potentially, oyster growth. On the other hand, during heavy rain periods, large amounts of nitrogen entered the estuaries, which then became phosphorus-limited. Optimally an intermediate level of Nitrogen:Phosphorus ratio is desired for enhancing SRO production in the south coast of NSW so that neither nutrient is limiting.
  • Focus on Molluscan Shellfish Biology/Ecology/Restoration

    Focus on Molluscan Shellfish Biology/Ecology/Restoration

    Focus on Molluscan Shellfish Biology/Ecology/Restoration, Especially for Oysters (Crassostrea virginica), Ecosystem Engineering and Related Services, Living Shorelines, Related Climate Change/Acidification, Remote Sensing, and Other Related Topics (Revision date 4/20/19) Table of Contents General Restoration Papers, Recent Shellfish Reviews and Related Subjects (relevant Taxonomy, focus Biogenic Molluscan Species, Oysters, Scale, Ecosystem Services, Climate Change, Stessors, Coral Reefs, etc.) ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Fisheries and Aquaculture Information, especially Reviews for Molluscs............................................... 25 General Climate, Physiology, and Ocean Acidification, Sedimentation, Stress Tolerance, Related Papers, Reviews, Websites ................................................................................................................................ 26 General Restoration Literature, Approaches, etc. ................................................................................... 28 Impacts and Site Selection for Aquaculture, Alternative Energy (wind turbines), etc. ............................. 31 Disturbance From Harvesting, Aquaculture Positive and Negative Effects, Non-Consumptive Human Impacts (Includes abandoned gear) ........................................................................................................ 32 Some Classic Works (and Reviews) ......................................................................................................
  • Population Genetics, Phylogeography and the Effects of Aquaculture on Genetic Diversity of the Silver-Lipped Pearl Oyster, Pinctada Maxima (Jameson)

    Population Genetics, Phylogeography and the Effects of Aquaculture on Genetic Diversity of the Silver-Lipped Pearl Oyster, Pinctada Maxima (Jameson)

    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Lind, Curtis E. (2009) Population genetics, phylogeography and the effects of aquaculture on genetic diversity of the silver-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima (Jameson) . PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/29608/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/29608/ Population genetics, phylogeography and the effects of aquaculture on genetic diversity of the silver-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima (Jameson) Thesis submitted by Curtis E. Lind, BSc (Hons) May 2009 For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, from the School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Statement of Access I, Curtis E Lind, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University Library and, via the Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and; I do not wish to place any further restriction on access to this work. ____________________________________ ____________________ Signature Date 2 Statement of Sources Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education.
  • Fish Bulletin 123. the California Oyster Industry

    Fish Bulletin 123. the California Oyster Industry

    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 123. The California Oyster Industry Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1870g57m Author Barrett, Elinore M Publication Date 1963-03-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 123 The California Oyster Industry By ELINORE M. BARRETT 1963 1 2 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge valuable help received in the form of interviews, letters, access to records, research assist- ance, and manuscript review from the following persons: Harold G. Orcutt and staff, California Department of Fish and Game, Menlo Park; F. M. Douglas and staff, Coast Oyster Co., Eureka; S. A. Sherriff, Rupert Fish Co., Inc., Burlingame; E. C. Greenhood and staff, California Department of Fish and Game, Terminal Island; Amasa C. Cornish, California Department of Public Health, Berkeley; Charles Johnson, Oscar Johansson, Henry F. Jensen, and Mrs. Agnes Leage, California oyster growers; Roy D. Graves, Marin County Historical Society, Inc.; Leo G. Hertlein, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco; Charles P. Hunt, Producers Trading Co., Inc., San Fran- cisco; J. B. Phillips, California Department of Fish and Game, Pacific Grove; Charles R. Pollock, Pacific Coast Oyster Growers Association, Seattle; Charles Robertson, Chicken-of-the-Sea, Inc., Long Beach; Lionel Shatz, A. Paladini, Inc., San Francisco; Ernest Salo, Humboldt State College, Arcata; and Mrs. Elizabeth R. Urquhart. Mrs. P. Patricia Powell set into proper style (for Fish Bulletins) my extensive list of references and Mrs. Loretta M. Morris typed the manuscript for submission to the printer.