Hamilton's Itinerarium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hamilton's Itinerarium Library of Congress Hamilton's Itinerarium HAMILTON'S ITINERARIUM A. D. 1744 IN ONE VOLUME HAMILTON'S ITINERARIUM BEING A NARRATIVE OF A JOURNEY FROM ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND THROUGH DELAWARE, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, CONNECTICUT, RHODE ISLAND, MASSACHUSETTS AND NEW HAMPSHIRE FROM MAY TO SEPTEMBER, 1744 BY DOCTOR ALEXANDER HAMILTON EDITED BY ALBERT BUSHNELL HART, LL.D. PROFESSOR OF HISTORY IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY LC PRINTED ONLY FOR PRIVATE DISTRIBUTION BY WILLIAM K. BIXBY SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI—MCMVII Copy 2 LIBRARY of CONGRESS Two Copies Received JAN 14 1908 Copyright Entry May 23, 1907 CLASS A XXc. No. 177571 COPY A. E 162 .H21 Copy 2 # 426 Copyrighted, 1907, By William K. Bixby All rights reserved THE DE VINNE PRESS v Hamilton's Itinerarium http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.02374 Library of Congress Amico suo honorando, divinitissimo domino Onorio Razolini, manuscriptum hocce Itinerarium, observantiae et amoris sui qualecumque symbolum, dat consecratque Alexander Hamilton. [ Translation: ] To his honourable and most Christian friend, Signor Onorio Razolini, this manuscript Itinerary is dedicated and consecrated as a slight token of his love and respect by Alexander Hamilton. vii The reader of the Itinerary of Doctor Alexander Hamilton will be interested in knowing something of the history of the manuscript. It was purchased by the present owner from Messrs. B. F. Stevens & Brown, of No. 4 Trafalgar Square, London. They purchased it from Frank T. Sabin, of No. 118 Shaftesbury Avenue, London, who states:— “The manuscript remained in the possession of the family of the Italian gentleman to whom it was dedicated, and to whom it was originally given, until within a few years. It then passed into the hands of an Italian bookseller, who sent it to a correspondent in London, from whom I purchased it. “Doubtless, owing to the rather obscure lettering on the back, it remained almost unnoticed for the last hundred years, or, on the other hand, it may have been preserved with reverent care by a generation or two of descendants, who finally, tempted by a good offer, parted with it. It will not do for me to indulge in too much fanciful conjecture. So far as facts are concerned, they are as stated above.” The present owner of the manuscript prints it for private distribution, believing that an unpublished manuscript of this period will be of interest to the parties to whom he sends it. Hamilton's Itinerarium http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.02374 Library of Congress W. K. B. Four hundred and eighty-seven copies of this work have been printed for private distribution only. The forms have been broken up and the type distributed. ix INTRODUCTION BY ALBERT BUSHNELL HART PROFESSOR OF HISTORY IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY Among the numerous journals and narratives of travel during the Colonial period, few are so lively and so full of good-humored comment on people and customs as the Itinerarium of Dr. Hamilton, which now for the first time has become known. The history both of the manuscript and of the writer is obscure. The original is a well-written and a remarkably well-spelled manuscript, covering both sides of sheets 6½ × 8½ inches, and making two hundred and seventy-eight pages. It is bound in vellum in a style unknown in America at that time, and therefore probably the work of an Italian book-binder. At the end is a statement that the manuscript was “Presented by Alexander Hamilton, Doctor of Medicine, to Onorio Razolini. Annapolis, Nov. 29, 1744.” This was two months after Hamilton returned to Annapolis, and it is probable that his Italian friend was a visitor there, and that he wrote a continuous manuscript from notes taken during his journey. It could hardly have been intended for publication at the time when written, for it is too free in comment on well known individuals. No reference is discoverable to the manuscript, either in the literature of the time or in later bibliographies; and it appears never to have been x consulted as a contribution to American history until acquired by Mr. Bixby. In preparing the manuscript for the press, the editor has had the efficient aid of two graduate students of Harvard University, Mr. Thomas N. Hoover has made a diligent search into the references to persons; and nearly all the important names have been placed in their proper setting, though some of the abbreviated names and obscure Hamilton's Itinerarium http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.02374 Library of Congress individuals resisted all effort to make them yield their identity. Mr. John Kennedy Lacock has followed the route of Hamilton throughout his journey, and has been been able to verify every place that he passed or visited, except some of the taverns which have long since ceased to exist; and the map accompanying this volume is the result of his researches. The editorial foot-notes have purposely been made succinct, the object being to state the full names of persons and places, with no detail except so far as necessary for identification. Hamilton's accuracy as a writer is shown by the fact that in only two or three cases, which are duly pointed out in the foot-notes, has he been detected in any serious mistake. The subject of this volume is a journey which Dr. Hamilton undertook in 1744, leaving Annapolis May 30, and travelling overland northward through New Castle, Wilmington, and Chester to Philadelphia. Mr. Hasell, of Barbadoes, whom he had expected to travel with him from Annapolis, he found at Philadelphia, where he stayed a week. June 13, he resumed his journey and spent three days on the road to New York, crossing the Delaware near Bristol, and passing through Trenton xi and Princeton to Perth Amboy; and thence, via three ferries, to Staten Island, across the Narrows, and across the East River to New York, that being apparently the surest and most convenient route. After six days in New York, he started, June 21, in a sloop for Albany, together with Rev. John Miln, formerly a clergyman in Albany. The journey up occupied nearly five days; he stayed about a week in and around Albany, and spent three days on the return sloop journey. After five days' stay in New York, July 5 to 10, he started eastward with two Boston merchants, journeying through Long Island to the neighborhood of Montauk Point, thence across the Sound to New London, and thence through Stonington, Newport, Bristol, and Dedham to Boston, the whole journey occupying eight days. At Boston he stayed ten days, and then, July 28, started northward, stopping at Marblehead, Salem, Ipswich, and Newbury, to Portsmouth and New Castle, and back by the same route, a week's journey in all. After about two weeks in Boston, he started southward August 18, going through Providence and Bristol to Newport, where he stayed a week. He resumed his travels August 24, passing New Hamilton's Itinerarium http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.02374 Library of Congress London, Saybrook, New Haven, and Norwalk to New York, a week's journey. The second visit in New York occupied two weeks; he left September 13, and after five days' stay in Philadelphia, reached home again September 27, having travelled, as he records it, 1624 miles. As to the author, throughout the Itinerarium he modestly refrains from discussion of his own family or condition and mentions his first name only in the dedication to his friend Razolini; but it is almost xii certain, in view of the fact that the manuscript in one place alludes to Mr. Dulany of Annapolis, that he was the Doctor Alexander Hamilton who, on May 29, 1747, was married to Margaret Dulany, daughter of Hon. Daniel Dulany; and that this lady was the widowed Mrs. Hamilton who in 1757 married William Murdock. Dr. Alexander Hamilton had a brother of whom he speaks as practising medicine in Maryland in 1727, and apparently still in Annapolis in 1744. Hamilton seems to have been fond of discursive writings, for he was the Historian of a society called the Tuesday Club in Annapolis, and has left several folio volumes in manuscript of a serio-comic history of that organization, which from the few specimens printed seem somewhat inferior to the Itinerarium in literary skill. The Itinerarium by chance allusions makes it certain that Hamilton was born in Scotland, and “learnt pharmacy” of David Knox, an Edinburgh surgeon. Some time in his life he travelled in England, and visited London. He practised medicine in Annapolis, but suffered a severe illness in 1743, so that he calls himself in one place a “valetudinarian”; and he made the journey in 1744 chiefly to recover his health. Of Annapolis he seems not to have been very fond; although he wrote home while on his travels, he records that for three months he received no news; and he alludes to the place as “a desolate expensive town,” and “that wretched city.” He was well acquainted in Maryland, where he had many friends and was in the habit of meeting visitors from other Colonies, some of whom were hospitable to him on his travels. He had means to xiii travel like a gentleman, with two horses, one of which carried his negro slave man, Dromo; and to live comfortably Hamilton's Itinerarium http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.02374 Library of Congress wherever he went. Dr. Moffatt, of Newport, he calls “an old acquaintance and school fellow of mine.” He took in the Physical News, of Edinburgh, a medical journal. Hamilton could speak Latin and a little French, the latter language he could also write with some facility; and he was interested in current and classical literature.
Recommended publications
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Philadelphia Election ^Iot 0/1742*
    The 'Philadelphia Election ^iot 0/1742* "^W "^T "TEE ARE thoroughly sensible of the Great Disadvantage \ /\/ Sir William Keith's management has been to our • • Interest/1 the Pennsylvania Proprietors wrote to James Logan, "but we hope now he is in England the People will Coole in their Zeal to his Party, so that we may get a good Assembly Chose."1 Their hope was already a reality. Keithian politics no longer had any significance; the old coalition which had gathered around the fiery and independent Governor ceased to exist almost with his departure for England in 1728. Only five of his supporters were returned to the legislature in 1729, and by the following year but three remained.2 The issues which created the controversies during the 1720's were already passe. The old leadership either died off, or gave up its positions of power, and in turn was supplanted during the next decade by a group of talented and younger men—Benjamin Franklin, Isaac Norris II, Israel Pemberton, Jr., William Allen, and James Hamilton.3 While party organization may have been more advanced in Penn- sylvania than in any other colony, it still depended upon personal relationships with control in the hands of a few wealthy families. The * This article, in somewhat different form, was read at a session devoted to early Pennsyl- vania history during the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Branch of the American Historical Association at Stanford University on Aug. 29, 1967. !The Proprietors to James Logan, Nov. 11, 1728, Pennsylvania Archives, Second Series, VII, 111-112.
    [Show full text]
  • Papéis Normativos E Práticas Sociais
    Agnes Ayres (1898-194): Rodolfo Valentino e Agnes Ayres em “The Sheik” (1921) The Donovan Affair (1929) The Affairs of Anatol (1921) The Rubaiyat of a Scotch Highball Broken Hearted (1929) Cappy Ricks (1921) (1918) Bye, Bye, Buddy (1929) Too Much Speed (1921) Their Godson (1918) Into the Night (1928) The Love Special (1921) Sweets of the Sour (1918) The Lady of Victories (1928) Forbidden Fruit (1921) Coals for the Fire (1918) Eve's Love Letters (1927) The Furnace (1920) Their Anniversary Feast (1918) The Son of the Sheik (1926) Held by the Enemy (1920) A Four Cornered Triangle (1918) Morals for Men (1925) Go and Get It (1920) Seeking an Oversoul (1918) The Awful Truth (1925) The Inner Voice (1920) A Little Ouija Work (1918) Her Market Value (1925) A Modern Salome (1920) The Purple Dress (1918) Tomorrow's Love (1925) The Ghost of a Chance (1919) His Wife's Hero (1917) Worldly Goods (1924) Sacred Silence (1919) His Wife Got All the Credit (1917) The Story Without a Name (1924) The Gamblers (1919) He Had to Camouflage (1917) Detained (1924) In Honor's Web (1919) Paging Page Two (1917) The Guilty One (1924) The Buried Treasure (1919) A Family Flivver (1917) Bluff (1924) The Guardian of the Accolade (1919) The Renaissance at Charleroi (1917) When a Girl Loves (1924) A Stitch in Time (1919) The Bottom of the Well (1917) Don't Call It Love (1923) Shocks of Doom (1919) The Furnished Room (1917) The Ten Commandments (1923) The Girl Problem (1919) The Defeat of the City (1917) The Marriage Maker (1923) Transients in Arcadia (1918) Richard the Brazen (1917) Racing Hearts (1923) A Bird of Bagdad (1918) The Dazzling Miss Davison (1917) The Heart Raider (1923) Springtime à la Carte (1918) The Mirror (1917) A Daughter of Luxury (1922) Mammon and the Archer (1918) Hedda Gabler (1917) Clarence (1922) One Thousand Dollars (1918) The Debt (1917) Borderland (1922) The Girl and the Graft (1918) Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Alida Livingston of New York
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 A Dutch Woman in an English World: The Legacy of Alida Livingston of New York Melinda M. Mohler West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Mohler, Melinda M., "A Dutch Woman in an English World: The Legacy of Alida Livingston of New York" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4755. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4755 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Dutch Woman in an English World: The Legacy of Alida Livingston of New York Melinda M. Mohler Dissertation submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Jack Hammersmith, Ph.D., Chair Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D. Elizabeth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Kenneth Fones-World, Ph.D. Martha Pallante, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of Dutchess
    OF DUTCHESS /680 ,.,/807 Cover: DANIEL CROMMELIN VERPLANCK 1762-1834 Painted by John Singlecon Copley in 1771 CottrteJy of The Metropolitan J\f11Jeum of Art New York. Gift of Bayard Verplanck, 1949 (See page 42) OF DUTCHESS /680-/807 by S. Velma Pugsley Spo11sored by THE DUTCHESS COUNTY AMERICAN REVOLUTION BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION as a 1976 Project Printed by HAMILTON REPRODUCTIONS, Inc. Poughkeepsie, N. Y. FOREWORD The Bicentennial Project rirled "Portraits of Dutchess 1680-1807" began as a simple, personal arrempr ro catalog existing porrrairs of people whose lives were part of rhe county's history in rhe Colonial Period. As rhe work progressed ir became certain rhar relatively few were srill in the Durchess-Purnam area. As so many of rhem had become the property of Museums in other localities it seemed more important than ever ro lisr rhem and their present locations. When rhe Dutchess County American Revolution Bicentennial Commission with great generosity undertook rhe funding ir was possible ro illustrate rhe booklet with photographs from rhe many available sources. This document is nor ro be considered as a geneological or historic record even though much research in rhose directions became a necessity. The collection is meant ro be a pictorial record, only, hoping rhar irs readers may be made more aware rhar these paintings are indeed pictures of our ancestors. Ir is also hoped rhar all museum collections of Colonial Painting will be viewed wirh deeper and more personal interest. The portraits which are privately owned are used here by rhe gracious consent of the owners. Those works from public sources are so indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Indelible Ink – the Trial of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’S Free Press
    BOOK REVIEW By M. KELLY TILLERY Indelible Ink – The Trial of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press ichard Kluger won the Pulitzer in late 1733. Alexander and Morris RPrize for his masterful expose intended to use it as a vehicle to make of the cigarette industry in Cosby and his royal administration Ashes to Ashes in 1996, and his study accountable to the people. As the most of school desegregation, Simple Justice prominent and wealthy lawyer in New (1975), is a classic. His latest, equally York, Alexander had a lot to lose and excellent if less controversial should be thus concealed his involvement, lest he of interest to every Philadelphia Lawyer. be charged with seditious libel or worse. Indelible Ink is the most thoughtful, Zenger was a businessman without comprehensive and well-researched any particular political leanings, but study of the 1735 criminal trial in New he knew this was risky business. So York City of newspaper publisher John he made a deal. He would print, and Peter Zenger on charges of seditious Morris and Alexander would write, but libel. While you may know that Zenger Alexander would pay for everything and was acquitted, that he was defended by a defend him for free if he was charged. Philadelphia lawyer Andrew Hamilton, And Zenger would not betray his and that his victory was based upon the backer’s identity. defense of truth, Kluger sets forth so The newspaper was a hit as each much more. And, it is not all what you issue turned up the heat on Cosby.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia
    MARTIN'S BENCH AND BAR OF PHILADELPHIA Together with other Lists of persons appointed to Administer the Laws in the City and County of Philadelphia, and the Province and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania BY , JOHN HILL MARTIN OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR OF C PHILADELPHIA KKKS WELSH & CO., PUBLISHERS No. 19 South Ninth Street 1883 Entered according to the Act of Congress, On the 12th day of March, in the year 1883, BY JOHN HILL MARTIN, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. W. H. PILE, PRINTER, No. 422 Walnut Street, Philadelphia. Stack Annex 5 PREFACE. IT has been no part of my intention in compiling these lists entitled "The Bench and Bar of Philadelphia," to give a history of the organization of the Courts, but merely names of Judges, with dates of their commissions; Lawyers and dates of their ad- mission, and lists of other persons connected with the administra- tion of the Laws in this City and County, and in the Province and Commonwealth. Some necessary information and notes have been added to a few of the lists. And in addition it may not be out of place here to state that Courts of Justice, in what is now the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, were first established by the Swedes, in 1642, at New Gottenburg, nowTinicum, by Governor John Printz, who was instructed to decide all controversies according to the laws, customs and usages of Sweden. What Courts he established and what the modes of procedure therein, can only be conjectur- ed by what subsequently occurred, and by the record of Upland Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Profession in Colonial America Anton-Hermann Chroust
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 33 | Issue 3 Article 4 5-1-1958 Legal Profession in Colonial America Anton-Hermann Chroust Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anton-Hermann Chroust, Legal Profession in Colonial America, 33 Notre Dame L. Rev. 350 (1958). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol33/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN COLONIAL AMERICA* Anton-Hermann Chroustt VI. NEw YORK New York accepted the common law of England as the basis of its own law at a relatively early stage. This favorable attitude towards English law is to a large extent probably due to the fact that the colony was acquired by conquest rather than settlement. Soon after the English had taken over New Amsterdam from the Dutch in 1664 and had renamed it New York, a code of laws was promulgated under the title of the Duke's Laws. In 1673 the Dutch retook New York and re-introduced the old Dutch laws, but lost it again in 1674 to the British who restored the code of 1665. This code, which is mainly the work of Matthias Nicolls, a barrister from Lincoln's Inn (1649), drew alike from the com- mon law, the Dutch colonial laws and from some of the local laws in force in the New England colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Ad Hoc Committee Report
    Ad Hoc Committee Report Unanimously Adopted by the Board of Trustees July 21, 2016 Philadelphia Bar Foundation | 1101 Market Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107-2955 P. 215.238.6337 | F. 215-238-1559 | E. [email protected] | www.philabarfoundation.org Philadelphia Bar Foundation Ad Hoc Committee Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Report………………………………………………………………………………………………Pages 1 – 25 Ad Hoc Committee Members…………………………….………………………………Appendix A The Official Will of Andrew Hamilton…………………………………………………Appendix B I. Introduction A. The Ad Hoc Committee’s Formation and Charge The Philadelphia Bar Foundation supports Philadelphia’s highly-regarded network of non-profit legal organizations. According to its Mission Statement, the Foundation “is dedicated to promoting access to justice for all people in the community, particularly those struggling with poverty, abuse and discrimination.”1 It is the only charitable foundation in Philadelphia that is solely dedicated to providing the region’s legal services community with the resources to protect the rights of our community’s most vulnerable citizens.2 Consistent with this mission, the Foundation is also committed “to advancing diversity and inclusion in the profession, so that all members of the bar can fully participate in all aspects of the profession.”3 This Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees to determine whether the Andrew Hamilton Benefit, the Foundation’s signature fund-raising event, should be renamed. The Ad Hoc Committee was convened by Bar Foundation Vice President, Thomas Brophy. Its fifteen members represent a cross-section of the Bar, including Foundation Trustees, Former Chancellors, and other prominent practitioners and academics in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UNIVERSITY of CENTRAL OKLAHOMA JOE C. JACKSON COLLEGE of GRADUATE STUDIES & RESEARCH Edmond, Oklahoma HATCH a THESIS SUBMI
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SHAREOK repository UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA JOE C. JACKSON COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES & RESEARCH Edmond, Oklahoma HATCH A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH WITH CREATIVE WRITING EMPHASIS By MELONIE HAU Edmond, Oklahoma 2008 1 NAME: Melonie Hau TITLE OF THESIS: Hatch DIRECTOR OF THESIS: Dr. Constance Squires PAGES: 251 ABSTRACT: Hatch is a novel which examines the struggles of urbanization, drug addiction, alienation from community, and shame which threaten a rural Oklahoma family. The Metzers live on a farm in Hatch, a town formed in the 1890s from the enthusiasm and idealism of Land Run pioneers and German immigrants. The story juxtaposes traditional rural life with contemporary issues such as adultery, addiction, and race and illustrates how characters resist their insulated environment. Told alternately from the points of view of three characters, Gloria Metzer, Ben Metzer, and their son, Thomas Metzer, the work follows each character’s decisions as each is tested emotionally and spiritually. Gloria, Ben, and Thomas must learn to honor their own power in making choices for their lives. Issues of spirituality immerge as each character faces moral and ethical dilemmas based on their choices. Set in intense heat of a drought-ridden summer, the novel utilizes a sense of history and place in order to highlight the struggles of each character. 2 3 Introduction I set out to write a novel about Oklahoma that does not drip with homespun cliché and language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of John Peter Zenger
    THE TRIAL OF JOHN PETER ZENGER A Play in Five Scenes by Michael E. Tigar Copyright © 1986, Michael E. Tigar All Rights Reserved Written for Initial Performance at the Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association New York, New York, August 10, 1986 Cast of Characters, in Order of Appearance (With names of actors at initial performance) John Peter Zenger, a printer (Scott Armstrong) Chief Justice James Delancey (Tim Miller) James Alexander, a lawyer (David Keyser) Richard Bradley, Attorney General of New York (Mac Williams) John Chambers, a lawyer (Rick Froom) Andrew Hamilton, a lawyer (Michael E. Tigar) Margaret Hamilton, his daughter (Katherine Tigar) Peter Zenger, Zenger's son (Steve Cummins) Thomas Hunt, Foreman of the Jury (G. William Birrell) Scene I: Supreme Court, New York City, April 1735 Scene II: Andrew Hamilton's home in Philadelphia, August 1735 Scene III: The Black Horse Tavern, New York City, August 1735 Scene IV: Supreme Court, New York City, August 1735 Scene V: Supreme Court, New York City, August 1735 ZENGER.DOC Page 1 Program Notes The libel trial of John Peter Zenger was a celebrated event in American colonial history: It fueled the dispute over freedom of the press in New York for decades thereafter. Briefly, Zenger was arrested and charged with libelling the colonial Governor, William Cosby. The Chief Justice, James Delancey, who presided at the trial, was a wealthy adherent to Cosby's cause, and was only 32 years old at the time of the trial. Cosby appointed Delancey to be Chief Justice when the former Chief Justice ruled against Cosby in a celebrated suit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colonial Family: Kinship Nd Power Peter R
    The Colonial Family: Kinship nd Power Peter R. Christop New York State Library ruce C. Daniels in a 1985 book review wrote: “Each There is a good deal of evidence in the literature, year since the late 1960sone or two New England town therefore, that in fact the New England town model may studies by professional historians have been published; not at all be the ideal form to use in studying colonial lheir collective impact has exponentially increased our New York social structure. The real basis of society was knowledge of the day-to-day life of early America.“’ not the community at all, but the family. The late Alice One wonders why, if this is so useful an historical P. Kenney made the first step in the right direction with approach, we do not have similar town studies for New her study of the Gansevoort family.6 It is indeed the York. It is not for lack of recordsthat no attempt hasbeen family in colonial New York that historians should be made. Nor can one credit the idea that modern profes- studying, yet few historians have followed Kenney’s sional historians, armed with computers, should feel in lead. A recent exception of note is Clare Brandt’s study any way incapable of dealing with the complexity of a of the Livingston family through several generations.7 multinational, multiracial, multireligious community. However, we should note that Kenney and Brandt have restricted their attention to persons with one particular One very considerable problem for studying the surname, ignoring cousins, grandparents, and colonial period was the mobilily Qf New Yorkers, grandchildren with other family namesbut nonetheless especially the landed and merchant class.
    [Show full text]