DOCSLIB.ORG

Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia MARTIN'S BENCH AND BAR OF PHILADELPHIA Together with other Lists of persons appointed to Administer the Laws in the City and County of Philadelphia, and the Province and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania BY , JOHN HILL MARTIN OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR OF C PHILADELPHIA KKKS WELSH & CO., PUBLISHERS No. 19 South Ninth Street 1883 Entered according to the Act of Congress, On the 12th day of March, in the year 1883, BY JOHN HILL MARTIN, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. W. H. PILE, PRINTER, No. 422 Walnut Street, Philadelphia. Stack Annex 5 PREFACE. IT has been no part of my intention in compiling these lists entitled "The Bench and Bar of Philadelphia," to give a history of the organization of the Courts, but merely names of Judges, with dates of their commissions; Lawyers and dates of their ad- mission, and lists of other persons connected with the administra- tion of the Laws in this City and County, and in the Province and Commonwealth. Some necessary information and notes have been added to a few of the lists. And in addition it may not be out of place here to state that Courts of Justice, in what is now the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, were first established by the Swedes, in 1642, at New Gottenburg, nowTinicum, by Governor John Printz, who was instructed to decide all controversies according to the laws, customs and usages of Sweden. What Courts he established and what the modes of procedure therein, can only be conjectur- ed by what subsequently occurred, and by the record of Upland Court. It is said that the English after the conquest of the lands on the Delaware, concluded not to make any violent change in the administration of justice as it then existed under the Dutch rule, following the good example of the Dutch, wh'o, on taking possession of the country in 1664, permitted the Swedish magis- trates to remain in office. So we find that there was sitting at Upland (Chester) on August 18, 1672, a Court with titles and powers unknown to the English law, its powers appearing to have been legislative as well as judicial. At what time the seat of justice was removed from New Gottenburg to Upland, is not definitely known. Stuyvesant met the Swedish Magistrates and Sheriff at Tinicum, in 1658, but the records of the Court there, as well as the records of the Upland Court prior to November 14, 1676, are lost. See Upland Record, 4.3. Under William Penh, 1681, a new order of things took place, and as Peter McCall, Esq., in his discourse before the Law Academy, on September 5, 1838, p. 7, says: IV PREFACE. "The first organization of the Courts was admirable for its simplicity and convenience. The County Court, in the days of Alfred and Egbert, a tribunal 'of great dignity and splendour.' was drawn from the obscurity into which it had sunk after the Norman invasion, and was made the ground-work of the edifice. It was composed of the Justices of the Peace of the several counties, with an appeal to the Provincial or Supreme Court. The Provincial Court originally consisted of five Judges. The number afterwards varied from five to three, who went their Circuits every fall and spring in each county. To it belonged the cognizance of the higher criminal offences, and all appeals from the County Courts, both in law and equity. To complete the structure were added the Quarter Sessions and Orphans' Court, and the Admiralty. Such was the plan of the Judicial system established at the settlement of the Colony; so simple, yet convenient in its arrangements, that though frequent alterations were made in its details by subsequent legislation, the general outline remains to the present day a standing proof of its endur- ing excellence." In addition to the regular County Court, a tribunal was estab- lished by Act of March 10, 1683-4, called the Peace-Makers, consisting of three persons, who held their appointment from the Court. Their duties seem to have been somewhat analogous to those of Arbitrators. Their judgment, however, when certified to the Court, was conclusive of its sentence. The County Courts were early (1685) made Courts of Equity as well as Law, but the Law and Equity sides were distinct, though held by the same Justices, except that when sitting in Equity they were called Commissioners, as will be seen by refer- ence to the minutes of the Courts of Chester County, (all the Records of the Common Pleas of Philadelphia, previous to 1789, are missing.) See Dr. Smith's History of Delaware Co., 161. The foot notes to Dallas' Laws, in the different Acts relative to the organization of the Courts, are interesting in this connec- tion, (see / Dallas, 172-74, &c.,) as are also the sketch of the Court of Equity given by Henry William Rawle, Esq., in his discourse before the Law Academy, February n, 1868, and the address of the Hon. James T. Mitchell, one of the Judges of the late District Court, at its final adjournment on January 4, 1875. This introduction would hardly be perfect without reference PREFACE. V to the former lists of admissions to the Bar, and lists of our law- yers that have appeared in print, viz: The Members of the Philadelphia Bar. A complete catalogue from July, 1776, to July, 1855, by R. F. Williams, Philadelphia, 1855, pp. 50. A Catalogue of the Philadelphia Bar, admitted between June and 1861 i, 1855, January i, ; compiled from the records of the several Courts in the City of Philadelphia, by Horace L. Peter- son, Esq. Printed by King & Baird, 1861.- A List of Admissions to the Philadelphia Bar from 1855 to 1867, will be found in The Age newspaper of January i, 1867. The Philadelphia Bar, a complete catalogue of the Members from 1776 to 1868, by E. Cooper Shapley and David Paul Brownf Jr., Esquires; Philadelphia, 1868, pp. 53. The offering of the carrier of the Legal Gazette to its patrons, December 25, 1871, being a list of the practising lawyers of the Philadelphia Bar, arranged according to seniority of admission, with the dates to thereof, February 23, 1871 ; pp. 7. " List of the practicing Members of the Philadelphia Bar," with the dates of their admission. Printed by John Campbell & Sons, October 10, 1879; PP- I0 - Directory of the Members of the Philadelphia Bar, being a list the location their offices a of practising Attorneys, and the of ; C. 2n^ pocket edition, by Richard Winship, Esq., 1879; PP- 34 > edition, 1881; pp. 38; 3rd edition, 1883; pp. 48. The Philadelphia Legal Directory, for the use of the profession, giving a list of the practising Lawyers, with the location of their offices, &c. Compiled by E. C. Markley & Son, 1882; pp. 14. The Philadelphia Directories, from 1854 to 1868, published each year a list of the practising Lawyers, and similar lists have been continued in "The Philadelphia Business Directory" and " in Boyd's Business Directory," since 1868. Among the many customs imported from England, relative to the members of the legal profession, is the practice of carrying their briefs and papers to Court in what are termed "Lawyer bags." The profession generally, until after the Civil War of 1861-5, carried green bags, though a few of the older lawyers varied the custom by using those of a blue color, but red bags are a modern innovation, within the last ten years. In this connection the following article from Jeaffreson's book VI PREFACE. about lawyers may not be deemed inappropriate, but a fitting conclusion to the introduction of this work to the profession, wherein I have striven to rescue from oblivion the names of the good men and true who have labored on the Bench and at the Bar of Philadelphia. "On the stage of the Carolina theatres, the lawyer is found with a in his hand the is the case in the litera- green bag ; same ture of until a recent Queen Anne's reign ; and comparatively date, green bags were generally carried in Westminster Hall and in provincial Courts by the great body of legal practitioners. From Wycherley's 'Plain Dealer,' it appears that in the time of Charles II., angry clients were accustomed to revile their lawyers as 'green-bag carriers.' When the litigious widow Blackacre upbraids the barrister who declines to argue for her, she exolaims : ' Impertinent again, and ignorant to me ! Gad's boddikins ! You puny upstart in the law, to use me so; you green-bag carrier; you murderer of unfortunate causes, the clerk's ink is scarce off your fingers.' In the same drama making much play with the green bag Wycherley indicates the widow Blackacre's quarrelsome disposition by decorating her with an enormous green reticule, and makes her son, the law student, stagger about the stage in a gown and a heavy burden of green bags. So, also, in the time of Queen Anne, to say that a man intend- ed to carry a green bag, was the same as saying that he meant to adopt the law as a profession. In Dr. Arbuthnot's History of John Bull, the prevalence of ' the phrase is shown by the passage, I am told, cousin Diego, you are one of those that have undertaken to manage me, and that you have said you will carry a green bag yourself, rather than we shall make an end of our law suit. Til teach them and you, too, to manage.' It must, however, be borne in mind that in Queen Anne's time, green bags, like white bands, were generally adopted by solicitors and attorneys, as by members of the bar.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pennsylvania Assembly's Conflict with the Penns, 1754-1768
    Liberty University “The Jaws of Proprietary Slavery”: The Pennsylvania Assembly’s Conflict With the Penns, 1754-1768 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the History Department in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in History by Steven Deyerle Lynchburg, Virginia March, 2013 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Liberty or Security: Outbreak of Conflict Between the Assembly and Proprietors ......9 Chapter 2: Bribes, Repeals, and Riots: Steps Toward a Petition for Royal Government ..............33 Chapter 3: Securing Privilege: The Debates and Election of 1764 ...............................................63 Chapter 4: The Greater Threat: Proprietors or Parliament? ...........................................................90 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................113 1 Introduction In late 1755, the vituperative Reverend William Smith reported to his proprietor Thomas Penn that there was “a most wicked Scheme on Foot to run things into Destruction and involve you in the ruins.” 1 The culprits were the members of the colony’s unicameral legislative body, the Pennsylvania Assembly (also called the House of Representatives). The representatives held a different opinion of the conflict, believing that the proprietors were the ones scheming, in order to “erect their desired Superstructure of despotic Power, and reduce to
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting the University of Pennsylvania's Connection to Slavery
    Documenting the University of Pennsylvania’s Connection to Slavery Clay Scott Graubard The University of Pennsylvania, Class of 2019 April 19, 2018 © 2018 CLAY SCOTT GRAUBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 OVERVIEW 3 LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION 4 PRIMER ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COLLEGE AND ACADEMY OF PHILADELPHIA 5 EBENEZER KINNERSLEY (1711 – 1778) 7 ROBERT SMITH (1722 – 1777) 9 THOMAS LEECH (1685 – 1762) 11 BENJAMIN LOXLEY (1720 – 1801) 13 JOHN COATS (FL. 1719) 13 OTHERS 13 LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION CONCLUSION 15 FINANCIAL ASPECTS 17 WEST INDIES FUNDRAISING 18 SOUTH CAROLINA FUNDRAISING 25 TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE AND ACADEMY OF PHILADELPHIA 31 WILLIAM ALLEN (1704 – 1780) AND JOSEPH TURNER (1701 – 1783): FOUNDERS AND TRUSTEES 31 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (1706 – 1790): FOUNDER, PRESIDENT, AND TRUSTEE 32 EDWARD SHIPPEN (1729 – 1806): TREASURER OF THE TRUSTEES AND TRUSTEE 33 BENJAMIN CHEW SR. (1722 – 1810): TRUSTEE 34 WILLIAM SHIPPEN (1712 – 1801): FOUNDER AND TRUSTEE 35 JAMES TILGHMAN (1716 – 1793): TRUSTEE 35 NOTE REGARDING THE TRUSTEES 36 FINANCIAL ASPECTS CONCLUSION 37 CONCLUSION 39 THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 40 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43 DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 2 INTRODUCTION DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 3 Overview The goal of this paper is to present the facts regarding the University of Pennsylvania’s (then the College and Academy of Philadelphia) significant connections to slavery and the slave trade. The first section of the paper will cover the construction and operation of the College and Academy in the early years. As slavery was integral to the economy of British North America, to fully understand the University’s connection to slavery the second section will cover the financial aspects of the College and Academy, its Trustees, and its fundraising.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAES Guide: the Historical Society of Pennsylvania
    PEAES Guide: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania http://www.librarycompany.org/Economics/PEAESguide/hsp.htm Keyword Search Entire Guide View Resources by Institution Search Guide Institutions Surveyed - Select One The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA 19107 215-732-6200 http://www.hsp.org Overview: The entries in this survey highlight some of the most important collections, as well as some of the smaller gems, that researchers will find valuable in their work on the early American economy. Together, they are a representative sampling of the range of manuscript collections at HSP, but scholars are urged to pursue fruitful lines of inquiry to locate and use the scores of additional materials in each area that is surveyed here. There are numerous helpful unprinted guides at HSP that index or describe large collections. Some of these are listed below, especially when they point in numerous directions for research. In addition, the HSP has a printed Guide to the Manuscript Collections of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania (HSP: Philadelphia, 1991), which includes an index of proper names; it is not especially helpful for searching specific topics, item names, of subject areas. In addition, entries in the Guide are frequently too brief to explain the richness of many collections. Finally, although the on-line guide to the manuscript collections is generally a reproduction of the Guide, it is at present being updated, corrected, and expanded. This survey does not contain a separate section on land acquisition, surveying, usage, conveyance, or disputes, but there is much information about these subjects in the individual collections reviewed below.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Philadelphia Election ^Iot 0/1742*
    The 'Philadelphia Election ^iot 0/1742* "^W "^T "TEE ARE thoroughly sensible of the Great Disadvantage \ /\/ Sir William Keith's management has been to our • • Interest/1 the Pennsylvania Proprietors wrote to James Logan, "but we hope now he is in England the People will Coole in their Zeal to his Party, so that we may get a good Assembly Chose."1 Their hope was already a reality. Keithian politics no longer had any significance; the old coalition which had gathered around the fiery and independent Governor ceased to exist almost with his departure for England in 1728. Only five of his supporters were returned to the legislature in 1729, and by the following year but three remained.2 The issues which created the controversies during the 1720's were already passe. The old leadership either died off, or gave up its positions of power, and in turn was supplanted during the next decade by a group of talented and younger men—Benjamin Franklin, Isaac Norris II, Israel Pemberton, Jr., William Allen, and James Hamilton.3 While party organization may have been more advanced in Penn- sylvania than in any other colony, it still depended upon personal relationships with control in the hands of a few wealthy families. The * This article, in somewhat different form, was read at a session devoted to early Pennsyl- vania history during the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Branch of the American Historical Association at Stanford University on Aug. 29, 1967. !The Proprietors to James Logan, Nov. 11, 1728, Pennsylvania Archives, Second Series, VII, 111-112.
    [Show full text]
  • Coates and Reynell Family Papers
    Collection 140 Coates and Reynell family Papers 1677-1930 (bulk 1730-1850) 66 boxes, 147 vols., 40 lin. feet Contact: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Phone: (215) 732-6200 FAX: (215) 732-2680 http://www.hsp.org Processed by: Sarah Heim Processing Completed: May 2006 Sponsor: Processing made possible by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Restrictions: None. © 2006 The Historical Society of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved. Coates and Reynell Family Papers, 1677-1930 (bulk 1730-1850) 66 boxes, 147 vols., 40 lin. feet Collection 140 Abstract Mary Coates (1707-1773) and her husband John Reynell (1708-1784) presided over a successful dynasty of Quaker professionals and philanthropists, despite having no biological children who lived to adulthood. After the death of Mary’s brother Samuel in 1748, John Reynell took on responsibility for her three orphaned nephews, Thomas, Josiah, and Samuel Jr. Little Samuel (1711-1748) eventually succeeded his “Uncle Reynell” as the head of a prosperous international trade business, dealing in American lumber, Caribbean sugar, and European manufactured goods. A contemporary of Benjamin Franklin, Samuel was among the first shareholders of the Library Company of Philadelphia. His son, Benjamin H. Coates, was a poet and a physician, a founder of the North American Medical and Surgical Journal and an attending physician at several charitable institutions in Philadelphia. Josiah established his own shipping business with his friend Edward Randolph, and fathered a vigorous family. His son George Morrison Coates also became a merchant, specializing in hardware. George’s two unmarried daughters, Beulah and Mary, distinguished themselves as pillars of women’s charitable organizations in the mid-nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY John Swanwick: Spokesman for "Merchant-Republicanism ' In Philadelphia, 1790-179 8 HE literature on the era of Jeffersonian democracy is largely- dominated by the great triumvirate of Thomas Jefferson, TJames Madison, and Albert Gallatin.* During the last dec- ade, however, historians have been paying more attention to state and local political leaders who played significant roles in the Demo- cratic-Republican movement.1 Among the more notable second-rank * In a somewhat abbreviated form this article was presented as a paper at the annual meeting of the Pennsylvania Historical Association held at Williamsport, Pa., on Oct. 22-23, 1971. The author wishes to express his gratitude to his colleague, Bernard Sternsher, for his helpful editorial suggestions. 1 Historians have given most of their attention to secondary Federalists, but since i960 the number of modern scholarly biographies of less prominent Republicans has increased. We now have first-rate biographies on Robert R. Livingston, David Rittenhouse, Aaron Burr, Daniel D. Tompkins, John Breckinridge, Luther Martin, Benjamin Rush (2), Samuel Smith, and James Monroe. There are also a number of good unpublished doctoral dissertations. Among the more notable studies are those on Elkanah Watson, Simon Snyder, Mathew Carey, Samuel Latham Mitchell, Melancton Smith, Levi Woodbury, William Lowndes, William Duane, William Jones (2), Eleazer Oswald, Thomas McKean, Levi Lincoln, Ephraim Kirby, and John Nicholson. Major biographies of Tench Coxe by Jacob E. Cooke, of John Beckley by Edmund Berkeley, and of Thomas McKean by John M. Coleman and Gail Stuart Rowe are now in progress. 131 132 ROLAND M.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyages of Two Philadelphia Ships
    The William and Favorite: The "Post-Revolutionary "Voyages of Two Philadelphia Ships AFTER the Revolution, American merchants worked to replace /\ hazardous wartime ventures with more stable and profitable JL JL, trades. Parliament allowed United States vessels the same privileges as English vessels when trading in Great Britain, but it prohibited their entry into colonial ports, as did several other nations. Thus, American merchants accustomed to purchasing British goods with profits from West Indian markets before the war now faced new obstacles to their former trades. One Philadelphia mercantile house, Stewart, Nesbitt & Co., used two of their ships acquired in wartime to experiment with promising peacetime oppor- tunities. A brief examination of their experiences offers a good sampling of the ways Americans tried to adapt to the changing commercial patterns and trade restrictions of the post-Revolutionary decade.1 Stewart, Nesbitt & Co. was organized in 1782 by two Philadel- phians of Irish birth. Walter Stewart was a young handsome army colonel who had just married the daughter of the city's leading investor in privateers, Blair McClenachan. Stewart's energy and new financial resources helped him convince his close friend, Alex- ander Nesbitt, to accept him as a business partner. Nesbitt, who had established himself before the war, invested mostly in letters of marque bound for West Indian and French ports, but he was also 1 The papers of Stewart, Nesbitt & Co., hitherto unexamined, are located in the library of the Mariner's Museum in Newport News, Virginia. Consisting of more than 600 letters, plus thousands of receipts and accounts, the correspondence is limited to letters received by the company and many of the business papers are undated, leaving time gaps in all the financial records.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTORAL VOTES for PRESIDENT and VICE PRESIDENT Ø902¿ 69 77 50 69 34 132 132 Total Total 21 10 21 10 21 Va
    ¿901¿ ELECTORAL VOTES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT ELECTORAL VOTES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT 901 ELECTION FOR THE FIRST TERM, 1789±1793 GEORGE WASHINGTON, President; JOHN ADAMS, Vice President Name of candidate Conn. Del. Ga. Md. Mass. N.H. N.J. Pa. S.C. Va. Total George Washington, Esq ................................................................................................... 7 3 5 6 10 5 6 10 7 10 69 John Adams, Esq ............................................................................................................... 5 ............ ............ ............ 10 5 1 8 ............ 5 34 Samuel Huntington, Esq ................................................................................................... 2 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 2 1027 John Jay, Esq ..................................................................................................................... ............ 3 ............ ............ ............ ............ 5 ............ ............ 1 9 John Hancock, Esq ............................................................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 2 1 1 4 Robert H. Harrison, Esq ................................................................................................... ............ ............ ............ 6 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Franklin
    Benjamin Franklin Benjamin Franklin FRS FRSA FRSE (January 17, 1706 [O.S. January 6, 1705][Note 1] – April 17, 1790) was a British American polymath and one of the Founding Fathers of the Benjamin Franklin United States. Franklin was a leading writer, printer, political philosopher, politician, FRS, FRSA, FRSE Freemason, postmaster, scientist, inventor, humorist, civic activist, statesman, and diplomat. As a scientist, he was a major figure in the American Enlightenment and the history of physics for his discoveries and theories regarding electricity. As an inventor, he is known for the lightning rod, bifocals, and the Franklin stove, among other inventions.[1] He founded many civic organizations, including the Library Company, Philadelphia's first fire department,[2] and the University of Pennsylvania.[3] Franklin earned the title of "The First American" for his early and indefatigable campaigning for colonial unity, initially as an author and spokesman in London for several colonies. As the first United States ambassador to France, he exemplified the emerging American nation.[4] Franklin was foundational in defining the American ethos as a marriage of the practical values of thrift, hard work, education, community spirit, self- governing institutions, and opposition to authoritarianism both political and religious, with the scientific and tolerant values of the Enlightenment. In the words of historian Henry Steele Commager, "In a Franklin could be merged the virtues of Puritanism without its Benjamin Franklin by Joseph defects, the illumination
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Indelible Ink – the Trial of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’S Free Press
    BOOK REVIEW By M. KELLY TILLERY Indelible Ink – The Trial of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press ichard Kluger won the Pulitzer in late 1733. Alexander and Morris RPrize for his masterful expose intended to use it as a vehicle to make of the cigarette industry in Cosby and his royal administration Ashes to Ashes in 1996, and his study accountable to the people. As the most of school desegregation, Simple Justice prominent and wealthy lawyer in New (1975), is a classic. His latest, equally York, Alexander had a lot to lose and excellent if less controversial should be thus concealed his involvement, lest he of interest to every Philadelphia Lawyer. be charged with seditious libel or worse. Indelible Ink is the most thoughtful, Zenger was a businessman without comprehensive and well-researched any particular political leanings, but study of the 1735 criminal trial in New he knew this was risky business. So York City of newspaper publisher John he made a deal. He would print, and Peter Zenger on charges of seditious Morris and Alexander would write, but libel. While you may know that Zenger Alexander would pay for everything and was acquitted, that he was defended by a defend him for free if he was charged. Philadelphia lawyer Andrew Hamilton, And Zenger would not betray his and that his victory was based upon the backer’s identity. defense of truth, Kluger sets forth so The newspaper was a hit as each much more. And, it is not all what you issue turned up the heat on Cosby.
    [Show full text]
  • Old St. James Church Yard / by William F
    Old St, James Church Yard The old historic graveyard adjoining St. James' Church contains much that is of interest to the antiquarian, the historian and the epitapher. Dating from the year 1744, its history reads like a romance and goes back to the early days, when Lancaster was but a townstead, and the surrounding coun- try was covered with vast forests in which the dusky savage roamed at will. During the early period the settlement was visited by strolling missionaries, who ministered to the Churchmen living here. The Venerable Society for the Prop- agation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts was the first missionary society organized in the Church of England after the Reformation. It was found- ed in 1701 for the purpose of carrying the Gospel, not only to the heathen in foreign lands, but also to those mem- bers of her communion who were without the regular ministrations of the Mother Church. One of the min- isters of this Venerable Society, the Reverend Robert Weyman, held ser- vices in the region now known as Lan- caster during the years 1717-1718. History has no record of the exact spot where the services were held. In the year 1728 the Reverend John Backhouse ministered to the people in this vicinity, according to the re- port which he sent to the S. P. G. Other services were conducted here from time to time during the years 1735, 1736, 1737,by the Reverend James Lindsay, another missionary sent out by the S. P. G. Thus it will be seen that those Churchmen living here had to be content with the occasional ser- vices afforded them from time to time, by the itinerant missionaries who strayed into the borough.
    [Show full text]